Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.
Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.No. | Citation | Case No. | Case Year | Parties | Bench Type | Order/Judgment | Order_Date | A.F.R | Head Notes/ Tag Line | Bench | Apex Court | Apex Status |
| 1 | Const. P. 8125/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Pakistan Minerals Developement Corporation (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-MAY-19 | Yes | Petitioner, Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd administrative control of the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources. In respect of an area of 3818.81 acres at Lakhra, District Jamshoro, for which a mining-lease was granted to the Petitioner for mining coal for a period of thirty[30] years. These renewal applications remained pending with the Respondent No.2, and though in the meantime both the mining-leases of the Petitioner expired in April 2015, the date of such expiry stood extended .Respondent No.2 had granted mining-permits to SLCMC without waiting for a decision on the Petitioner???s appeals pending under Rule 71 of the SMC Rules. Mr. Jawad Dero, the learned AAG Sindh, and Mr. Jaffar Raza, learned counsel for SLCMC had objected to the maintainability of these fresh petitions on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions for the same relief were still pending. we agree with Barrister Zameer Ghumro that these petitions cannot be held to be not-maintainable merely on the ground that the Hyderabad Petitions are also pending. Appellate Authority manifests that the refusal to renew the Petitioner mining-leases was only for the reason that the Petitioner was Federal Government entity and the Government of Sindh had already made up its mind to award a mining concession in the same area to the SLCMC, a company wholly owned by the Government of Sindh. Having found no reason to interfere in the discretion exercised by the Respondent No.2 The petitions succeed for prayer clause 3 in terms that the impugned Notifications dated 09-07-2018 granting mining permits to SLCMC (Respondent No.3) having been granted in contravention of Rule 68 of the SMC Rules, the same are without lawful authority and are therefore set-aside judgment shall be dispatched by the office to o be placed in C.P. No. D-7643/2018 pending before this Court at Karachi The petitions stand disposed off. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.2795/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others,C.P.443-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Energy Department, Govt. of Sindh and another v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation and another,C.A.1539/2019 M/s Sindh Lakhra Coal Mining Company (Pvt) Ltd v. Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation thr. its Project Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of | |
| 2 | Const. P. 601/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2017 | Kashif Hussain Gaad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 3 | Civil Revision 49/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Mumtaz Ali Hulio (Applicant) VS Azhar Ali and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 4 | Const. P. 905/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | M/s MCB (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.2612/2019 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others,C.A.533/2020 MCB Bank Ltd, Lahore v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Zulfiqar Hussain Awan, Director (Legal-II), Office of Consultant Legal Affairs to the President of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted.to be fixed after 4 weeks a/w C.As.1386/2018 etc,Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 16-Mar-22) at 1.00 pm before special bench | ||
| 5 | J.M 7/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Syeda Maryam. (Applicant) VS Mst. Rabia Bibi & Others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 6 | Suit 344/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | MUHAMMAD SHAHID AKRAM. (Plaintiff) VS GHULAM QADIR JUMANI & ORS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 7 | Cr.J.A 39/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Muhammad Mithal (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 8 | S.M.A 369/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Aziz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 13-FEB-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 9 | S.M.A 46/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Mohammad Abdul Bashir - DECEASED | 1998 | Mst. Jamila Naheed...........(Petitioner (Petitioner) VS Mrs. SaminaQasim (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 10 | Suit 1676/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Manzoor Ahmed Soomro.. (Plaintiff) VS Hameed Ahmed & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 13-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 11 | I. A 95/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | The Lake City Holdings (Pvt) Limited (Appellant) VS United Bank Limited and another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 12 | Suit 1762/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mrs. Zarina Iqbal (Plaintiff) VS Haji Jaffar & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 13 | Const. P. 64/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Syed Akbar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Mst Mehar-U-Nisa and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 29-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 14 | Cr.Bail 519/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ali Sher (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JUL-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 15 | Const. P. 3508/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Riasat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-DEC-19 | Yes | 1. Pursuant to Article 129 of the Constitution, the executive authority of the Provincial Government is to be exercised by the Provincial Cabinet as a collective entity albeit in the name of the Governor. When a Provincial statute, such as the Sindh Agriculture University Act, 1977, provides for the exercise of executive authority by the Provincial Government, that is to be done and the decision for that has to be taken by the Provincial Cabinet and not by the Chief Minister alone. Rel: Mustafa Impex v. Government of Pakistan (PLD 2016 SC 808); Karamat Ali v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2018 Sindh 8); Mirpurkhas Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Province of Sindh, C.P. No.D-8591/2018. 2. Having seen that the word ???Government??? in section 27(1) of the Sindh Agriculture University Act, 1977, as it stood amended at the relevant time by the Sindh Universities and Institutes Laws (Amendment) Act, 2014, could only mean the ???Provincial Cabinet???, the decision to extend the tenure of the Respondent No.5 as Vice Chancellor for another term, and the terms and conditions of such extension, had to be taken by the Provincial Cabinet and not by the Chief Minister in isolation of the Provincial Cabinet. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 16 | Const. P. 6554/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS PM & DC and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | (a) The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was by virtue of Article 89(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, i.e., by a resolution of the Senate disapproving the same and not by way of any repealing enactment. Therefore, the effect of repeal contained in sections 6, 6-A and section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which otherwise apply only when a repeal is by way of a repealing enactment, were neither triggered nor would those serve as an aid in construing the effect of repeal under a Constitutional provision such as Article 89. In other words, on the repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, nothing contained in the General Clauses Act, 1897 would come to save the Amending Admission Regulations that had been made under the repealed Ordinance. In view of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council v. Muhammad Fahad Malik (supra), Article 264 of the Constitution also did not have the effect of saving or giving permanency to the Amended Admission Regulations when the effect of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was only temporary as it was never accorded approval by the Parliament. Therefore, on 29-08-2019, when the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was repealed by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, the Amended Admission Regulations also stood repealed and the Original Admission Regulations were revived. (b) It will be seen that while the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 repeals all previous Regulations, but that is subject to sub-section (7) which provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process. The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 1962 by the PMC Ordinance, 2019, the former being a permanent statute under the 1973 Constitution, is not a repeal by virtue of Article 89 of the Constitution, but a repeal by a repealing statute, albeit a temporary one, and one which has been expressly made subject to section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which in turn provides that ???the repeal shall not revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal takes effect???. We have already discussed above that on 29-08-2019 the Amended Admission Regulations had ceased and the Original Admission Regulations had revived. Therefore, when sub-section (7) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process, those can only be the Original Admission Regulations. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.4221/2019 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others,C.A.610/2020 Pakistan Medical & Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Ms. Urooj Fatima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted,Pending | |
| 17 | Civil Revision 27/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2018 | Haji Ghano Khan Jatoi and others (Applicant) VS District Forest Officer a Forestation Division Larkana and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 18 | Suit 1646/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | Arshad Mahmood & Others (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-DEC-19 | Yes | Since the Hindu Gymkhana is a Government-owned protected heritage and the Subject Agreement is not with any private-owner of protected heritage under sections 7(3) to 7(5) or section 8 of the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Preservation) Act, 1994 [the Heritage Act], the role of the Advisory Committee envisaged under the said provisions is also not attracted. For the same reason the power of the Advisory Committee to pass a prohibitory order under section 10 of the Heritage Act, which is dependent on an agreement with the private owner under section 8 of the Act, is also not attracted. The record does not show that the Government sanctioned ???custodianship??? of the Hindu Gymkhana to the Advisory Committee under section 7(1) of the Heritage Act; nor does the criteria of section 13 of the Heritage Act seems to be met by the Hindu Gymkhana. Thus, having seen that the provisions of sections 7, 8, 10 and 13 of the Heritage Act are not attracted to the circumstances of the case, prima facie it cannot be said that construction of a theatre by NAPA on the land granted to it was prohibited by the Heritage Act, or that the said Act required NAPA to obtain the approval of the Advisory Committee before raising such construction. Impugned notice to remain suspended pending suit. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 19 | 2021 YLR 141 | J.M 45/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Al-Habib Coop: Housing Society Ltd (Applicant) VS Mrs. Shamim Barlas & another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-MAY-20 | Yes | Where the plaintiff/applicant establishes fraud, the defendant benefitting from the fraud and opposing the application of section 18, Limitation Act, must show that the plaintiff had clear and definite prior knowledge of the facts constituting the particular fraud and not merely clues or hints of the fraud, failing which limitation will run only from the date of actual knowledge of the fraud. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 20 | Cr.Bail 558/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O JAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-MAY-20 | Yes | Effect of the prohibition in section 51(1) of the CNS Act, 1997. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 21 | Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 22 | Const. P. 2619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Khawaja Izhar ul Hasan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 23 | Const. P. 200/1989 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 1989 | Wazir Ali Industries (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | No | applicant Muhammad Javed Khan, who is the son of late Abdul Wahid Khan/surety, has prayed that the surety documents submitted by his above named late father with the Nazir of this Court be returned to him. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 24 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 103/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | MUHAMMAD ASAD QURESHI S/O MASOOD AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 25-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 25 | Const. P. 2714/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Qamaruddin Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 26 | Const. P. 3449/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | M/s IFFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Hanif Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.731-K/2019 Haneef Ahmed Siddiqui v. Chief Executive/Factory Manager M/s IFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.,C.A.27-K/2020 Haneef Ahmed Siddiqui v. Chief Executive/Factory Manager M/s IFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted in all cases and appeals in the fixed for hearing with 3 wekks.,Pending Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 27 | Const. P. 2828/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Abu Bakar Kabir Suleman (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 28 | Suit 2576/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Karim Rathor & others (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Naeem & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-21 | No | When matter can be addressed by an injunction, no need to appoint Receiver. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 29 | Suit 633/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Sabre Travel Network Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & Ohers. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-NOV-20 | No | Suit against tax proceedings. Deposit required by Searle IV Solution v. Federation of Pakistan (2018 SCMR 1444) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 30 | Const. P. 8331/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mehboob Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-OCT-19 | Yes | Regularization Act 2013 does not suggest that all those contractual employees for whom the basic requirements of transparency is not fulfilled, are also entitled to be regularized. Regularization of Ad-hoc or contract employees under Act of 2013 is not open for all those contractual and ad-hoc employees for whom the codel formalities have not been fulfilled thus a competition should have been made available amongst all those who were interested in the appointments on subject posts. We would not approve the process involved in the appointment of petitioners, which could ultimately deprive the eligible and entitled persons of a fair competition and a precedent could be made to cater the system where the appointment of selected persons, can be legitimized. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.614-K/2019 Mehboob Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed | |
| 31 | Const. P. 3534/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-JUN-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 32 | Const. P. 2580/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Noman Ahmed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Board of Intermdiate Education and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 33 | Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 34 | Const. P. 2593/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Rao Talib Hussain & anothers (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 35 | Const. P. 640/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Gulji & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 36 | Const. P. 1761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Syed Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | CP No. D- 1761 of 2011 CP No. D- 1763 of 2011 CP No. D- 614 of 2012 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 37 | Const. P. 1393/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 38 | Const. P. 1931/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Vishandas (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 39 | Const. P. 770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Salman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.1712-K/2021 Salman Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 40 | Const. P. 51/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mst Shahnaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 41 | Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 42 | Civil Revision 107/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: RA. sec 92 CPC not applicable to waqf | 2000 | Misri @ Shamsuddin (Applicant) VS Tharparkar Dist Devolopment (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Civil Revision section 92 CPC not applicable to waqf | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 43 | Const. P. 1757/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Herlal and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 44 | Const. P. 1913/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Sindh High Court Employees C.Operative (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 45 | Const. P. 442/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 46 | Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 47 | Const. P. 692/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Bheerji (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 48 | Const. P. 632/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.918-K/2022 Faheem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh Chief Minister, through Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 49 | Const. P. 1564/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 50 | Const. P. 356/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Syed Sharafat Ali (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 51 | Suit 810/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mrs. Aroosa Iqbal Siddiqui. (Plaintiff) VS Yousuf Qamar Siddiqui & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-SEP-22 | No | Dismissal for want of evidence operates as res judicata. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 52 | Const. P. 4863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Zargul Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-SEP-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 53 | Suit 85/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | M/S TAHIR FOODS PRODUCTS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-FEB-22 | Yes | Power of DG I&I Customs re phytosanitory action under the Pakistan Plant Protection Rules, 2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 54 | Const. P. 382/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Atta Hussain Qadri (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 55 | Suit 2121/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No.126 of 2022 | 2021 | MUNIB ABDUL RAUF JANGDA (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-APR-22 | No | Audit notice under section 25 Sales Tax Act, 1990, un-lawful in absence of reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 56 | Suit 1717/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No. 2600 of 2015, Suit No.2439 of 2016, Suit No.2573 of 2016. | 2015 | The Searle Company Limited & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-APR-22 | No | Section 5A Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 declared unconstitutional. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 57 | Cr.Acq.A. 5/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2023 | Gulsher Lahbar (Appellant) VS Aqeel Ahmed & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 58 | Suit 1500/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Abdul Ghani & others. (Plaintiff) VS Waheeduddin Siddique & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-SEP-22 | No | Where main relief is time-barred, then the ancillary, dependent or consequential relief, even if attracting a larger period of limitation, has to go along with the main relief. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 59 | Const. P. 2622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Ghulam Fareed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 60 | Suit 320/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | K-electric (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-MAY-22 | No | Jurisdiction of DG I&I ??? IR to issue notice under section 176 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 61 | Spl. Cr. A. 47/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) VS AGHA MEHMOOD UL HASSAN HARAVI & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 19-OCT-22 | Yes | Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, overrides Prevention of Smuggling Act, 1977. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 62 | Const. P. 2/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Mohammad Bachal and another (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education and literacy dept: & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-MAR-23 | No | No regularization of contract employee. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 63 | R.A (Civil Revision) 6/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 1998 | Allah Warrayo and others (Applicant) VS Ratto Khan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 64 | Civil Revision 156/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Civil Revisin S-113/2022 | 2022 | Qadir Bux Soomro (Applicant) VS Moula Bux Soomro & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 65 | Cr.Rev 80/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2021 | Imran Ghous Shaikh (Applicant) VS Mohammad Gul Brohi & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 66 | Cr.Rev 15/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | Assadullah Chijjan (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ayoub & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 67 | Execution 58/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2004 | M/S. A.H. SERVICES (Petitioner) VS PROV. OF SINDH & ORS. (Decree Holder) | S.B. | Order | 10-JAN-20 | No | When the decree provides for an alternate mode for satisfaction of the decree, this is not a case that requires treating the Execution as a suit under section 47 CPC to determine a disputed question of fact. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 68 | S.M.A 17/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Syed Zain Abbas (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 28-FEB-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 69 | Const. P. 4190/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Askari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS President of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 70 | Suit 533/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Cdr. (Retd) Zahoor Ahmed & another (Plaintiff) VS C. Muhammad Abid & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 71 | Suit.B 58/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) VS Tuwairqi Steel Mills Ltd., & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 10-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 72 | Cr.Bail 391/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Habibullah Sharl (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 73 | Suit 1710/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Syed Shafaat Ali.(ISSUES) (Plaintiff) VS Syed Feroz Ali. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 26-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 74 | Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 103/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | IMRAN S/O AMEER BUX (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 75 | I. A 74/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Abu Bakar (Appellant) VS First Women Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.1120-K/2018 Abu Bakar v. First Women Bank Limited and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 76 | Suit -52/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Allahdino & Others.. (Plaintiff) VS H.H Shaikh Zaid Bin ultan Al-Nahyan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 77 | Suit 370/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2005 | MANZOOR AHMED SHAHZAD (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD SHAKIR SHAN (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 15-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 78 | Const. P. 587/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muneeb Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 79 | Const. P. 2375/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Muhammad Essa Bhutto and ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.722-K/2019 Ali Akbar Ujjan and others v. The Chairman Port Qasim Authority and others,C.P.723-K/2019 Akbar Adeeb Zubairi and another v. The Chairman Sindh Lobour Appellate and others,C.P.741-K/2019 Rasheed Ahmed Memon v. The Chairman Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed,Pending Dismissed,Pending Dismissed | ||
| 80 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 522 | Const. P. 5237/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Gautam Dawani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-DEC-20 | No | Reasons assigned to the short order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the MDCAT petitions viz. C.P. Nos.D-4953, 5036, 5158, 5237 of 2020 (challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020) by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||
| 81 | Suit 42/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Syed Zain Ul Abideen (Plaintiff) VS Federal Board of Revenue & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-APR-20 | Yes | Ouster of jurisdiction to try a civil suit in respect of matters arising under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 2017 and exceptions to such ouster. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 82 | Const. P. 4483/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Pakistan International Airline Corp Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 83 | Const. P. 838/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Imran Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-JAN-20 | Yes | 1. Since the Petitioner???s service was terminated under Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, which rule has since been declared un-constitutional by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Itrat Sajjad (2017 SCMR 2010), the only point left for our consideration is whether the effect of the declaration in Itrat Sajjad on the case of the Petitioner can be addressed by us in writ jurisdiction. 2. It had been settled by a 5 member Bench of the Supreme Court in DHA v. Jawaid Ahmed (2013 SCMR 1707) that applying the ???function test???, the DHA is a ???person??? to whom a writ can issue under Article 199(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution of Pakistan. But then, moving to a question distinct, viz. whether the employee of a statutory authority can invoke the writ jurisdiction of the High Court to enforce service rules of the statutory authority, it was held that where service rules were non-statutory, those cannot normally be enforced in writ jurisdiction for such rules attract the principle of ???master and servant???; but at the same time it was also held that where action of a statutory authority in a service matter is in violation of principles of natural justice, such action can be interfered with in writ jurisdiction. Itrat Sajjad reiterates the same principles, and while it was concluded that the DHA Service Rules are non-statutory and thus not enforceable ordinarily by way of a writ petition, the judgment went on to hold that since Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules violated the principle of natural justice, the case fell within the recognized exception that a writ can issue where the action of a statutory authority in a service matter is violative of the principle of natural justice. For the same reason, this petition, to the extent it assails termination issued under the same Rule 8(b)(1) of the DHA Service Rules, is also maintainable. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 84 | 2021 PCr.LJ Note 38 | Criminal Appeal 219/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | ANANTKUMAR PARSHOTAM (Appellant) VS MEM. OF MANAGING COMT. NARAYAN TEMPLE TRUST & ORS (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Under section 8-A of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, an order that is appealable to the High Court does not include an order dismissing the complaint. However, the appeal can be converted to a criminal revision. 2. In order to constitute an offence under the Illegal Dispossession Act, the complaint must disclose actus reas and mens rea, and if the facts that constitute an offence under section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act are not disclosed through the complaint or documents with it, then the Court can dismiss the complaint straight away. Rel: Waqar Ali v. The State (PLD 2011 SC 181). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 85 | Suit 1171/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mr. Mohammad Qasim (Plaintiff) VS Haroon Qasim Hussain & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-APR-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 86 | R.A (Civil Revision) 120/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2014 | Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Applicant) VS Shahnawaz and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.548-K/2021 Shabbir Ahmed & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 87 | Civil Revision 198/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Abdul Majeed Kalhoro (Applicant) VS Amjad Ali Arain (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 88 | Const. P. 2512/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abrar Ali Khichi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 89 | Suit 2206/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | M/s. Chhipa Corporation (Plaintiff) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-MAR-21 | Yes | Explanation clause to Order II Rule 2 CPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 90 | Const. P. 2518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS M/s Hub Domestic Products Pvt Ltd and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 91 | Suit 308/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/S. FOREL INTERNATIONAL TRADING & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS WAQAS AHMED JAT & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 25-MAY-21 | Yes | Suit barred for staying freezing order passed under section 5(5) of the FIA Act, 1974. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 92 | Const. P. 2686/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 93 | Const. P. 4035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 94 | Const. P. 1272/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Asralan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 95 | Suit 717/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | AGAH ASAD ABBAS (Plaintiff) VS MST.NASEEM IRFAN (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUL-21 | Yes | Limitation for an application for restoration of a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, is governed by Article 163 of the Limitation Act, not by Article 181. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 96 | Suit 316/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Khawaja Muhammad Arif & another. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Zeenat Begum & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 12-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 97 | Suit 1682/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Pakistan Petroleum Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-21 | Yes | Ouster clause in Section 227(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 ??? Suit against show cause notice ??? Plaint rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 98 | Cr.J.A 631/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | JAWAD ALI S/O DEEDAR ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 99 | Const. P. 4172/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Sami Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 100 | Suit 271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Asim (Plaintiff) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-JUN-21 | No | Audit notice issued by the Commissioner beyond jurisdiction, could not be remedied by transferring the same to the Commissioner having jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 101 | Const. P. 639/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Muhammad Ismail & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 102 | Const. P. 365/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Waqas & anothers (Petitioner) VS NAB & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 103 | Const. P. 1174/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Sikandar Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 104 | Const. P. 1491/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Akhlaue Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 105 | Const. P. 2648/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Neno (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 106 | Const. P. 1548/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mst Sajida &anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 107 | Const. P. 262/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 108 | Const. P. 217/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2001 | Agha Nisar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 109 | Const. P. 427/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Arsalan Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 110 | Const. P. 974/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Dr Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 111 | Const. P. 2155/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 112 | Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Out of turn promotion, deputation and OPS | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 113 | Const. P. 2358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 2358 & 2622 of 2019 | 2019 | Faisal Shah Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 114 | Const. P. 38/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) VS Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 115 | Const. P. 745/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Asma Hameed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 116 | Const. P. 441/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 117 | Const. P. 583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Lakhmir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 118 | Const. P. 2382/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Attaullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federal Secretary Ministry of Water and Power dev.... (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 119 | Const. P. 594/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 120 | Const. P. 3207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sardar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 121 | Const. P. 114/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: attached case ...... CP No. D- 1236 of 2014 | 2018 | Ghulam Mohammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 122 | Const. P. 842/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Zaheer Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 123 | Const. P. 1661/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Syed Zafar Ali Shah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 124 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 22/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with Constitution Petition No. D ??? 7423 of 2021 | 2022 | Collector of Customs (Enforcement) (Applicant) VS M/s. Ara Detergents & Chemicals FZE & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-APR-22 | Yes | Scope of Tribunal???s power under section 194A Customs Act, 1969. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 125 | Spl.Cr.Bail 8/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl. Cr. Bail Application No. 09 of 2022 | 2022 | MUKESH KUMAR S/O RADHOMAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-MAR-22 | No | Bail declined in offence under Section 156(1) (89) of the Customs Act, 1969 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 126 | Const. P. 5373/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Principal Links School and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-JAN-22 | No | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 127 | Const. P. 1103/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Mst Hameeda Nawaz Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 128 | R.A (Civil Revision) 161/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Haji Arbab & another (Applicant) VS Kheemchand thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-AUG-22 | No | revision application is dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 129 | Suit 1387/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No. 386 of 2019 | 2019 | Mrs. samina (Plaintiff) VS Faraz Tasneem & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-SEP-22 | No | Power to appoint receiver exists to meet the ends of justice. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 130 | Election Appeal 3/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Tayyeb Hussain Hashmi S/o Syed Iqbal Hussain (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-AUG-22 | No | Election Appeal NA-246 KARACHI, SOUTH-I. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 131 | Const. P. 816/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Imran Ali Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-23 | Yes | Employee engaged on adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 132 | Const. P. 7641/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Constitution Petition No. D ??? 7642 of 2019 | 2019 | Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Trustee of Port of Karachi and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-JUN-22 | No | Eviction under the Port Authorities Land and Building (Recovery of Possession) Ordinance, 1962. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.834-K/2022 Muhammad Usman v. Trustee of the Port of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 133 | Suit 1653/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | K-Electric Limited (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 02-DEC-22 | No | K-Electric. Consumer Service Manual. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 134 | Cr.J.A 40/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Adnan Khan Pathan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 135 | Conf.Case 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | The State (Appellant) VS Mohammad Paryal & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 136 | Const. P. 946/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: aa | 2013 | Astro Plastic (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-DEC-22 | Yes | ADR under Customs Act, 1969. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 137 | Execution 46/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORP. LTD (Decree Holder) VS FIRST DAWOOD INVESTMENT BANK (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 138 | Suit 983/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mrs. Hina Mumtaz Somroo (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Sami Soomro (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 03-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 139 | Const. P. 2847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sajjad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-JUL-19 | Yes | Declare that naming, renaming any street, road, government institute, town, or city after the name of any individual having no positive social, role, courage or exceptional dedication to service in ways that bring special credit to an area, city town is illegal, unlawful against the basic rights of citizens of particular areas, towns, cities and public at large. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 140 | Suit 2418/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Raza & others (Plaintiff) VS Nasir Khan (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 141 | S.M.A 241/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Barbara Helena Philomina through attorney Debbie (Petitioner) VS Marina Caroline Bond - Deceased (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 142 | I. A 15/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Pak Leather Crafts Limited & others (Appellant) VS Al-Barak Bank Limited (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 19-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.1422-K/2018 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited,C.A.24-K/2019 Pak Leather Crafts Limited and others v. Al-Baraka Bank Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted,Pending Dismissed | ||
| 143 | Const. P. 2102/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | M/s Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Meezan Bank Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 144 | Suit 1808/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | CPLC-Neighborhood Care & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 24-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 145 | S.M.A 354/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Zahid Rahim (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 146 | Suit 1264/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | MUHAMMAD AYUB GABOL (Plaintiff) VS THE PROV OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 147 | Cr.Bail 698/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Jawad Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 15-JUL-19 | No | Bail After Arrest | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 148 | Suit 2215/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Muhammad Kashif Vohra. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Ismail & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-NOV-19 | Yes | 1. A suit for specific performance of contract of immovable property brought by the vendee can be dismissed without going through a trial where the plaintiff, when put on terms to deposit the sale consideration in Court, fails to do so. That has been the consistent approach on the Original side of this Court. The wisdom behind that of course is that when called upon by the Court, if the plaintiff/vendee cannot demonstrate that he is ready and willing to make payment to perform his part of the contract, which is the primary test for grant of equitable discretionary relief in a suit for specific performance, then that is sufficient reason for the Court to decline the exercise of discretionary jurisdiction. Rel: Allah Ditta v. Bashir Ahmed (1997 SCMR 181); Abdul Hameed Khan v. Ghulam Rabbani (2003 SCMR 953); and Hamood Mehmood v. Shabana Ishaque (2017 SCMR 2022); 2. It is not in every case that the Court may require the plaintiff of a suit for specific performance of contract to deposit the sale consideration in Court. Rel: Bin Bak Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Friends Associates (2003 SCMR 238). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 149 | Suit 2319/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Zamir Ahmed Khan.. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Hassan Chaniyoon & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-SEP-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 150 | Cr.Bail 1507/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | FAHEEMUDDIN S/O ALEEMUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-NOV-19 | Yes | In section 395 PPC, while the alternative to life imprisonment is rigorous punishment ???which shall not be less than four years nor more than ten years???, that alternative punishment still provides for a maximum of 10 years, keeping the offence within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C. Thus, at the stage of bail when the Court looks at the alternate punishment provided under section 395 PPC, that is for the purposes of considering whether the case is one of further inquiry within the ambit of sub-section (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C., and it is not to say that the case does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 151 | Cr.Bail 829/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | ALLAH MUHAMMAD S/O KHUDA NOOR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUL-20 | Yes | (1) Direction by a superior Court to the trial court to conclude a trial within a specified period is an administrative direction, and non-compliance thereof does not ipso facto entitle an accused person to be admitted to bail. (2) Return of the stolen amount by the accused cannot be taken as a ground in itself to grant bail independent of the merits of the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 152 | Suit 2/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | MST. ANEELA ZEHRA (Plaintiff) VS FAHEEM HAIDER & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-MAY-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 153 | 2021 CLD 362 | Suit 94/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Jazaa Foods (Pvt.) Limited & another. (Plaintiff) VS Junaid Jamshed (Pvt.) Limited & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-APR-20 | Yes | 1. Effect of disclaimer made under section 21 of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001 from exclusive use of a name. 2. The principle that registration of a trade mark gives rise to a prima facie case, balance of convenience and likelihood of irreparable loss, that principle would be applicable where the trade mark was registered without a disclaimer. 3. In view of section 42(3) of the Trade Marks Ordinance, 2001, the use of the disclaimed feature of the mark in question would not constitute trade mark infringement. 4. An action for passing-off is essentially to protect ???property in goods??? based on the reputation of those goods, as distinct from an action to protect a trade mark which is a property in itself. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 154 | Civil Revision 109/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2017 | Shafi Muhammad Khan (Applicant) VS Abdul Rehman & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 155 | Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-OCT-19 | Yes | Though he was appointed in the year 1996 on ad-hoc and the appointment apparently was not regular one yet the petitioner has spent more than two decades with a hope that no later, the post would fallen vacant, he will be considered. The record reflects that he is still being considered as ad-hoc. This status throughout his career has not earned him anything except that he has faced certain charges which he defended and that he being deprived of further promotion on account of such status. The period of ad-hoc appointment should not have prevailed for such a long period. In case the authority had no complaints as far as the conduct and working of the petitioner is concerned, steps should have been taken by the authority to regularize the services of the petitioner. The authority remained indolent and petitioner continued as ad-hoc. The record shows that the only ground whereby he was deprived of any such promotion is that he was an ad-hoc employee. Thus, while we consider that his very appointment was not made on regular basis in BPS-18, we are also conscious of the fact that the petitioner has served more than two decades without any prospects of promotion | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 156 | Const. P. 6339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Habeen Fatani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-20 | Yes | ECL Matter. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 157 | R.A (Civil Revision) 55/1996 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 1996 | Muhammad through his legal heirs (Applicant) VS Muhammad Islam & other legal heirs of Gul Muhammad (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 158 | Suit 304/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Husein Industries Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Sui Southern Gas Company Limited & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. A bank guarantee is an independent contract between the surety (bank) and the creditor (beneficiary of the guarantee), and as such the bank guarantee is to be construed on its own terms independent of the underlying contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, and irrespective of claims pending interse the creditor and principal debtor. Rel: National Construction Ltd. v. Aiwan-e-Iqbal Authority (PLD 1994 SC 311); and Shipyard K. Damen International v. Karachi Shipyard & Engineering Works Ltd. (PLD 2003 SC 191). 2. Mobilization Guarantees are generally not subject to a restraining order even if there is a dispute between the parties to the underlying contract. However, in cases of guarantees other than Mobilization Guarantees, the Court have granted or refused injunction to restrain encashment depending upon the literal words used in the guarantee. Rel: National Grid Company v. Government of Pakistan (1999 SCMR 2367); and Shipyard K. Damen International ibid. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 159 | 2021 PLD Sindh Note 57 | Suit 1740/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Sadan General Trading LLC. (Plaintiff) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 25-JUN-20 | Yes | Measure of damages under section 73 of the Contract Act. Assessment of reasonable compensation under section 74 of the Contract Act. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 160 | M.A. 8/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2020 | Mazhar Ali Shaikh (Appellant) VS Public at Large and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-SEP-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 161 | Suit.B 15/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | NIB BANK LTD (Plaintiff) VS M/S.VENUS CHEMICALS PVT LTD. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUN-20 | Yes | Statement of account filed by the bank did not bear the name and official title of the persons certifying the same as required by section 9(2) of the FIO, 2001 read with section 2(8) of the Bankers??? Books Evidence Act, 1891. Such was not a ???certified copy??? and did not attract a presumption of correctness. The bank will have to prove the same as any other document. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 162 | Suit 1559/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: along with Suits No. 1560 of 2020 and Suit No. 264 of 2021. | 2020 | M/s. Matiari Sugar Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-OCT-21 | No | Selection of audit under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 requires giving of reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 163 | Suit 370/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Kohinoor Soap & Detergents Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-20 | No | Suit against tax proceedings. Deposit required by Searle IV Solution v. Federation of Pakistan (2018 SCMR 1444) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 164 | Const. P. 162/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Rashid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS IBA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.654-K/2019 Rashid Ali Khan v. Institute of Business Administration (IBA) and anotehr,C.A.45-K/2020 Rashid Ali Khan v. Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi thr. its Registrar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned | ||
| 165 | Suit 989/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Reliance Petrochemical Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff) VS F.B.R., & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-MAR-21 | Yes | After repeal of proviso to section 40B of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the posting order passed thereunder by the Commissioner is not saved under section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 166 | Suit 2249/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Saeed Ibrahim Veera . (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Iqbal & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 10-MAR-21 | No | Section 202 Contract Act, 1872. Power of Attorney coupled with a sale agreement. Effect of. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 167 | Const. P. 2410/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | Yes | promotion issue | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 168 | Const. P. 2728/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Bashiran Inayat Masih (Petitioner) VS Administrator DMC Korangi and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 169 | Const. P. 2573/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 170 | Criminal Miscelleneous 189/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | DR. EHSAN BARI & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 171 | Const. P. 2395/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS The Secretary SWWB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | Yes | The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 172 | Suit 1872/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Saleem Butt.. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Challenge to the vires of section 230(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on the ground of delegation of excessive legislative power ??? not successful. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. SRO 115(I)/2015 re the conferring of powers and functions on the DG I&I, was within the jurisdiction of the FBR. Effect of striking-down of same SRO by another High Court ??? discussed. The invoking of section 176 does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 173 | Const. P. 614/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Mst:Akbaro (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board Of Trustee E.O.B.I, & Or (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 174 | Const. P. 1102/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | MS Beenish Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 175 | Const. P. 1550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Jalauddin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 25-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 176 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 177 | Const. P. 1328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mehboob Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 178 | Criminal Miscelleneous 19/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) VS Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 179 | Const. P. 202/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2003 | Ghulam Mustafa Shah and anothers (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 180 | I. A 46/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Ali Rashid (Appellant) VS M/s. United Bank Ltd. & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-OCT-19 | Yes | Article 166 of the Limitation Act requires such application under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC as well as deposit thereunder to be made within 30 days from the date of sale. Such deposit is a condition precedent to entertain the application and the Court cannot extend the time for depositing the amount under section 148 CPC too. The date of sale in the ibid rules relates to situation on which the sale was knocked out to the highest bidder and not the date of confirmation. The date of confirmation of sale under Rule 92 CPC relates to the issuance of sale certificate. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 181 | Suit 175/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Iqbal Khamisani (Plaintiff) VS M/s Hotel Metropole (Pvt) Limited & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-APR-22 | No | Plaint rejected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 182 | Cr.Misc. 179/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Pervaiz Ahmed Chandio (Applicant) VS The State & 2 others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-JUN-18 | No | joining of accused | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 183 | Spl.Cr.Rev. 35/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl. Cr. Rev. 36, 37 and 38 of 2020 | 2020 | MUHAMMAD IDRESS S/O ABDUL MAJEED & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANTOHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-OCT-22 | No | Cognizance u/s 185A(1)(a) Customs Act is similar to that u/s 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 184 | Suit 1035/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ali Gohar (Plaintiff) VS Nisar Ahmed (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-SEP-22 | No | Cheque given as guarantee ??? effect. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 185 | Const. P. 240/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2017 | Mazhar Ali Langah (Petitioner) VS Asad Ali Khoso & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JAN-23 | Yes | Territorial jurisdiction of Family Court is governed by Rule 6 of the Family Court Rules 1965, not by provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 186 | R.A (Civil Revision) 139/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Govt: Of Sindh and Others (Applicant) VS Amjad Saeed and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 11-AUG-22 | No | Amenity Plot in private housing scheme. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 187 | Const. P. 646/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-AUG-22 | Yes | "Industrial Relations. Challenge to registration of trade union re trans-provincial establishment". | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 188 | Const. P. 550/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Mst. Kiran Yazdani D/o Syed Ather Yazdani (Petitioner) VS The XXth Civil Judge/JM, Khi South and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-22 | Yes | When an appeal lies against an order on temporary custody passed under section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 189 | Cr.Acq.A. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Sikandar Ali Shah (Appellant) VS Noor Ul Haque Abro & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 190 | Const. P. 1348/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Wahadat Siraj Afridi (Petitioner) VS Mst. Furqan Naseem And ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 27-JUN-22 | No | Distinction between fraud in legal proceedings and fraud by a party upon another. | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.1190-K/2022 Wahadat Siraj Afridi v. Mst. Furqan Nasreen & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 191 | R.A (Civil Revision) 113/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Qadir Bux Soomro (Applicant) VS Moula Bux Soomro (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 192 | Suit 2580/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No.2719 of 2021, Suit No.2720 of 2021, Suit No.2721 of 2021 & Suit No.2897 of 2021 | 2021 | AL-KARAM TOWEL INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-MAR-23 | Yes | Re: Concessionary Tariff of RLNG. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 193 | R.A (Civil Revision) 73/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2018 | Ghulam Safdar Brohi (Applicant) VS Mukhtiar Ali Chandio & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Suit for malicious prosecution where acquittal on benefit of doubt. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 194 | Suit 533/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Zain Khan. (Plaintiff) VS Taj Roshan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-APR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 195 | Suit 1808/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mst. Bilqis Bano & another. (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Defence Housing Authority & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 17-JUL-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 196 | H.C.A 219/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Karachi Metropolitan Corporationi & another (Appellant) VS M/s. Zafar Memorial Education Society (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 197 | H.C.A 171/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.4612/2018 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others,C.P.518-K/2019 Mst: Sajida Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.883/2020 Mst. Sajeda Mushtaq v. Federation of Pakistan thr. the Secretary M/o Interior, Islambad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Pending Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 198 | S.M.A 141/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Muhammad Iqbal S/o Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) VS Noor Muhammad Chutani - Deceased (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 199 | H.C.A 104/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Port Qasim Authority (Appellant) VS Industrial Management & Investment Co. Ltd. & ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.A.577/2019 Aromatic Foods Limited v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.578/2019 Industrial Management & investment Company Ltd. v. Port Qasim Authority & others,C.A.579/2019 Project Development Corporation LTD v. Port Qasim Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending ,Pending ,Pending | ||
| 200 | Const. P. 4047/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Ali Javed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-OCT-19 | Yes | The general principles of up-gradation that to our mind emerge from the enunciations of the Supreme Court can be elucidated as follows: (i) ???Up-gradation??? is not the same as ???promotion???, the latter being a term specifically defined in civil service statutes; (ii) Up-gradation is essentially an upgrade of the post to a higher ???pay-scale??? and not a promotion to a higher ???grade???. Thus, the incumbent of the upgraded post retains his substantive grade; (iii) Up-gradation is meant for isolated posts, where the service structure does not provide avenues for promotion to a higher pay-scale thus putting the incumbent at a disadvantage as compared to other employees, its purpose being to address the stagnation and frustration of the employee of such post so that he/she remains productive; (iv) To justify up-gradation, the Government will have to demonstrate that it is required for restructuring or reforming the department or to meet exigencies of service in the public interest. In other words, up-gradation should be pursuant to a scheme or a policy; (v) Up-gradation should not be to the prejudice of other employees and should not be used to by-pass prescribed rules of promotion. Rel. Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456); Regional Commissioner Income Tax v. Munawar Ali (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030); and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 201 | Civil Revision 3/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Dr. Rajkumar alias Gul (Applicant) VS Anand Ram and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 19-AUG-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 202 | Suit 1461/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Mohsin Abbas. (Plaintiff) VS Air Waves Media (Pvt) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 203 | Const. P. 451/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Ghulam Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-OCT-19 | Yes | Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.652-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari,C.A.7-K/2022 Province of Sindh thr. Senior Member Board of Revenue and others v. Ghulam Ali Leghari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned [ Repeat notice to Respondent Nos.2-7 ] | |
| 204 | 2021 CLD 194 | Suit.B 15/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | National Bank of Pakistan (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Textile City Limited & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-APR-20 | Yes | 1. Notwithstanding the failure of the defendant to comply with conditions of a leave application, the Court is still required to apply its mind to the case of the plaintiff before passing any order/judgment. Leave granted where statement of account incomplete. 2. Notwithstanding the creation of a mortgage, the mortgagor remains liable to the lessor for any breach or non-performance of the conditions of lease; and that if the lessor forfeits the lease, the remedy of the mortgagee is against the mortgagor for indemnification, and not against the lessor. The security of the mortgagee in the mortgaged property can be no better than the interest given to the mortgagor by the lease. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 205 | Cr.Bail 508/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | ABDUL RASHEED S/O GHULAM RASOOL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-JUL-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 206 | Civil Revision 170/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Raja Abdul Hameed,thr:L.Rs. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ahsan Nawaz & anor (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-SEP-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 207 | Criminal Appeal 506/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | ATTAULLAH S/O RIAZUDDIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 24-FEB-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 208 | Const. P. 5124/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s Farkhunda Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS Secretary, M/o Interior & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-20 | Yes | It is well-settled law that the service of temporary employees can be terminated on 14 days??? notice or pay in lieu thereof, whereas in the present case petitioner claims revival of the contract through reinstatement in service, which factum cannot be thrashed out in writ jurisdiction. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 209 | Const. P. 985/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Irfan S/o Muhammad Yousuf Nagori (Petitioner) VS Zahid Hussain and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-APR-21 | No | Rent: Default and personal need. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 210 | Const. P. 2448/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | Justice(R)Ibadatyar Khan(late)through Legal heirs (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 211 | Const. P. 4896/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muzaffar Hussain Katpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-APR-21 | Yes | suspension order | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 212 | Suit 3/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Amsons Textile Mills (Pvt) Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 05-MAY-21 | Yes | res judicata in suit after decision in constitution petition. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 213 | Const. P. 5232/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Danish Khan (Petitioner) VS NBP and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 214 | Const. P. 6462/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Najam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | Yes | deceased quota | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 215 | Suit 850/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with other connected Suits. | 2020 | Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 09-AUG-21 | Yes | Selection for audit under section 25 of the Sales Tax Act and section 46 of the Federal Excise Act requires the giving of reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 216 | Const. P. 4112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-21 | Yes | Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 217 | Const. P. 2167/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shahnawaz Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 218 | Const. P. 3786/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) VS Sajjad Ali And ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | The private respondents in these cases were gatekeepers and labours respectively and were terminated in terms of Section 12(3) of the Standing Order, 1968, thus it is not an ???industrial dispute??? which could empower the Commission to assume and exercise its jurisdiction in terms of Sections 54 and 57 of the IRA, 2012. Such provisions empowering the Commission in terms of Sections 54 and 57 of the IRA, 2012 were also in existence well before its promulgation and also while the provisions of IRO(xxiii) of1969 were in existence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.683-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Sajjad Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Disposed of | |
| 219 | Const. P. 3585/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-APR-21 | Yes | termination--Sindh Madressatul Islam University | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 220 | Const. P. 7700/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Husnain Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | Yes | Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 221 | Suit 1710/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mrs. Tahera Iqbal Kazi & another (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Naseem Abid Khan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 07-MAY-21 | No | Time of essence of contract. Judgment on admission. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 222 | Const. P. 96/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C. P. No. D- 06 of 2020 [Muhammad Asif & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C. P. No. D- 96 of 2020 [Abdul Rasheed & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-111 of 2020 [Muhammad Anwar vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-126 of 2020 [Nizamuddin & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-244 of 2020 [Wali Muhammad & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] | 2020 | Abdul Rasheed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 223 | Const. P. 526/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 224 | Const. P. 1028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 225 | Const. P. 3787/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | M/s Rajby Industries (Petitioner) VS Rahim Dad And ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.684-K/2019 M/s Rajby Industries v. Rahim Dad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Disposed of | ||
| 226 | Const. P. 1160/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Ghous Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 227 | Const. P. 3157/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Sh. Nenoo Bheel (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | we may observe that pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges; prima-facie there was/is no conviction in his credit, and pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on that score. In our view pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of any charges; and, is violative to the law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon (PLD 2007 SC 35) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 228 | Const. P. 182/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-198 of 2021 [Qurban & another Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-435 of 2021 [Khalil Ahmed & anothervs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-479 of 2021 [Mushtaque Ali & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-509 of 2021 [Noorullah Dehraj vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-534 of 2021 [Nazar Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-668 of 2021 [Gul Mir vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-769 of 2021 [Mst. Razia & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-845 of 2021 [Abdul Majeed vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-914 of 2021 [Pir Bux & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1027 of 2021 [Ali Ahmed & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1070 of 2021 [Ayaz Ali & others vs. SHO PS Punhan Khan Chandio & another] C.P No.D-1198 of 2021 [Ali Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1277 of 2021 [Mukhtiar Ali & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1543 of 2021 [Behram Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1556 of 2021 [Khurram Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] -:2:- C.P No.D-182/2021 a/w connected petitions C.P No.D-1689 of 2021 [Muhammad Waris @ Suneel vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] | 2021 | Mevo Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 229 | Criminal Appeal 437/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | ATHAR ELLAHI S/O AKHTAR ELLAHI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-NOV-21 | No | Safe custody of narcotic not proved. Accused acquitted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 230 | Const. P. 688/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Imran (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 231 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 1061 | Const. P. 1170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 232 | Const. P. 361/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2005 | Mehran Oils (Pvt) Limited (Petitioner) VS The Commissioner (Hyderabad) (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 233 | Const. P. 2134/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Abdul Wahid and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 234 | Const. P. 1416/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Zulfiqar Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 235 | Const. P. 63/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Amin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 236 | Const. P. 477/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Fareed Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 237 | Const. P. 1291/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-OCT-19 | Yes | we have straightaway enquired from the Counsel as to what reason was provided in support of the application for condonation of delay, he relied upon the affidavit in support of the application available at page-99. In para-2, para-12 of the memo of petition was adopted in support of the application for codonation of delay. He claimed to have fallen sick due to sudden shock of his removal from service and claimed to have remained in constant supervision of a doctor with effect from 02.2.2012 to 30.4.2012. In support of such contention he attached two certificates of doctors available on record. First certificate is of 29.4.2012 and the other is of 01.5.2012. Both these certificates only demonstrate that the petitioner remained under treatment of a doctor and not that he was bedridden or unable to engage in daily activities | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 238 | Cr.Misc. 187/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Pervaiz Ahmed Chandio (Applicant) VS Sardar Khan Chandio & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 29-JUN-18 | No | bail cancellation | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 239 | Suit 1468/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | ZAHEEN COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (Plaintiff) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 29-APR-22 | No | Dispute of boundaries of suit land ??? stay granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 240 | R.A (Civil Revision) 74/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Mushtaque alias Mushtaque Ahmed Shaikh (Applicant) VS Haji Sathi Shaikh and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 24-FEB-23 | No | Effect of Article 79 of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 241 | Suit -1267/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | TANWIR JAMSHED (Plaintiff) VS THE SINDH BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 18-AUG-22 | No | KBTPR, 2002. Dangerous building. Protected heritage. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 242 | R.A (Civil Revision) 37/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | P.O Sindh and another (Applicant) VS Raheemdad Mahar and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-JAN-23 | No | There was nothing to show that prior to the suit the Plaintiffs had made any claim for compensation to the Irrigation Department under section 31 of the Sindh Irrigation Act, 1879, or that they had ever intended to use the suit land for agricultural purpose. Therefore, the award of damages on the ground that the Plaintiffs were deprived of agricultural produce from the land was not supported by the evidence and was only conjecture. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 243 | Const. P. 1937/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | natasha Ali Lakhani & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-DEC-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 244 | Suit 1074/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Ever Shine Constructors (Plaintiff) VS Khairpur Special Economic Zone (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-MAY-22 | Yes | Court having jurisdiction under section 20 Arbitration Act, 1940. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 245 | Const. P. 1202/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Hameer Ali (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-23 | Yes | Employee on engaged adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 246 | Suit 1497/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-NOV-22 | Yes | Doctrine of indoor management. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 247 | Cr.J.A 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | Zahid Lashari (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 248 | Suit 1593/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | NAZAR GUL (Plaintiff) VS MAYMAR HOUSING SERVICE (PVT) LTD. & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-MAY-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 249 | Suit 553/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Party-1 (Plaintiff) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 250 | Cr.Bail 486/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Wahid Bux @ wahidoo Shaikh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 11-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 251 | Suit.B 58/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) VS Tuwairqi Steel Mills Ltd., & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 31-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 252 | Const. P. 536/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Jangi Mahar & another (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh (Appellant) | S.B. | Order | 22-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 253 | H.C.A 448/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Ahsanuddin (Appellant) VS Shahid Hussain Malik & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 254 | Suit 242/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Shiraz Sultan K. Moosa & another. (Plaintiff) VS Ibrahim Ali Bahi Chari table Trst & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 255 | Suit 702/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Shabbir Ismail & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Al-Rashid Co-Op. H.S. Ltd. & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-AUG-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 256 | S.M.A 252/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Hutoxy Cowasjee and others (Petitioner) VS Null (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-MAR-20 | No | A Probate is not a direction by the Court to any third-party to do, or to refrain from doing a certain act. A Probate, or Letters of Administration and a Succession Certificate are not a ???decree??? passed by a Court. Thus, where a person or authority to whom a Probate, or Letters of Administration or a Succession Certificate is presented to demonstrate authorization to act for the estate of a deceased, and such person/authority refuses to facilitate the Executor or Administrator, the Executor or Administrator can invoke remedies available at law. Contempt applications dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 257 | Const. P. 5570/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muneem Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Registrar Pakistan Nursing Council & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-NOV-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 258 | H.C.A 6/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Faiz Muhammad (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.286-K/2019 Shahid Hussain Malik v. Faiz Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Disposed of | ||
| 259 | Cr.Bail 1508/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | DILAWAR S/O MIR ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 260 | Civil Revision 51/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | Wilayat Ali Khaskheli and others (Applicant) VS Gul Hassan Khaskheli and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-SEP-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 261 | Const. P. 6439/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Javeria (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | (a) The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was by virtue of Article 89(2)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, i.e., by a resolution of the Senate disapproving the same and not by way of any repealing enactment. Therefore, the effect of repeal contained in sections 6, 6-A and section 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which otherwise apply only when a repeal is by way of a repealing enactment, were neither triggered nor would those serve as an aid in construing the effect of repeal under a Constitutional provision such as Article 89. In other words, on the repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, nothing contained in the General Clauses Act, 1897 would come to save the Amending Admission Regulations that had been made under the repealed Ordinance. In view of Pakistan Medical and Dental Council v. Muhammad Fahad Malik (supra), Article 264 of the Constitution also did not have the effect of saving or giving permanency to the Amended Admission Regulations when the effect of the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was only temporary as it was never accorded approval by the Parliament. Therefore, on 29-08-2019, when the PMDC Ordinance, 2019 was repealed by the effect of Article 89 of the Constitution, the Amended Admission Regulations also stood repealed and the Original Admission Regulations were revived. (b) It will be seen that while the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 repeals all previous Regulations, but that is subject to sub-section (7) which provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process. The repeal of the PMDC Ordinance, 1962 by the PMC Ordinance, 2019, the former being a permanent statute under the 1973 Constitution, is not a repeal by virtue of Article 89 of the Constitution, but a repeal by a repealing statute, albeit a temporary one, and one which has been expressly made subject to section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which in turn provides that ???the repeal shall not revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the repeal takes effect???. We have already discussed above that on 29-08-2019 the Amended Admission Regulations had ceased and the Original Admission Regulations had revived. Therefore, when sub-section (7) of section 50 of the PMC Ordinance, 2019 provides that the previous Regulations will continue to apply to the on-going admission process, those can only be the Original Admission Regulations. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.4396/2019 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others,C.A.611/2020 Pakistan Medical and Dental Council now Pakistan Medical Commission thr. its Secretary, Islamabad v. Javeria & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted,Pending | |
| 262 | 2021 CLC 54 | Suit 362/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Wakeel Akhtar (Plaintiff) VS Shahzad Alam (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 29-NOV-19 | Yes | While Article 84 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order provides a mode for proving execution of a document by comparison of signature or hand-writing, that is an additional mode and not a substitute of or an alternate to the mandatory provision of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order. The mode of proof by way of Article 84 is not the most desirable of modes in that, the signature and hand-writing of a person may vary with time and age; or a person called upon under sub-Article (2) of Article 84 to give a specimen of his signature or hand-writing may feign the same to defeat the comparison. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 263 | Cr.Bail 1197/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | AZIZULLAH MALIK S/O HAJAN KHAN MALIK (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 264 | Suit.B 4/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | National Bank of Pakistan. (Plaintiff) VS M/s. Amna Export (Pvt) Ltd. & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 265 | Suit 1479/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | M/S.ADAMJEE INSURANCE CO.LTD (Plaintiff) VS THE ASSISTANT COLLECTOR & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-NOV-20 | Yes | Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 266 | Const. P. 5036/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ramsha Haider and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-20 | No | Interim orders passed by Sindh High Court Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry for the MDCAT entry test in the petitions challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 267 | Suit.B 2/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Bankers Equity Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Galadari Cement (Gulf) Ltd., & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-JUN-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 268 | Const. P. 427/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Ghulam Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-APR-21 | Yes | In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 269 | R.A (Civil Revision) 23/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2003 | Mst. Bibi Shah Sultani (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & 05 others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 08-FEB-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 270 | Const. P. 1206/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Abdul Ghaffar Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 271 | Suit 348/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | The Sprint Express (Pvt) Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Karachi Metropolitan Corporation & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-MAR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 272 | Const. P. 2628/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Rashid Ejaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 273 | Suit 1560/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | M/S.ISLAMIC EDUCATIONAL INST. (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD SADIQ (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 19-MAR-21 | No | Bar to fresh suit under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 274 | Suit 2415/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Saleem Butt (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan and Others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-MAY-21 | Yes | Given the mechanism in-built in section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, which includes the providing of reasons in writing to the taxpayer, the power conferred on the Commissioner to call for record under section 177(1) of the Ordinance, does not by itself offend Article 25 of the Constitution. The question then, whether such power has been used unlawfully, is different, and one that may vary with the circumstances of each case. While making such challenge, the Plaintiff had also to demonstrate infringement of a Fundamental Right. The invoking of section 177(1) does not militate against the concept of deemed assessment under section 122 of the Ordinance. Malafides had to be pleaded with particulars. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 275 | Const. P. 6300/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Bashir Ahmed Abbasi Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-APR-21 | Yes | Prima facie under the Sindh Rules of Business, 1986, the Chief Minister is the Chief Executive of the Province; and, has no direct role whatsoever in the matter of a Junior School Teacher, about his appointment, posting, transfer, promotion, and disciplinary issues. On the aforesaid proposition, the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of The STATE v. ANWAR SAIF ULLAH KHAN (PLD 2016 Supreme Court 276) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 276 | Const. P. 1901/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Ikram Ali (Petitioner) VS M/s PTCL and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-NOV-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 277 | Suit 2019/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with other connected Suits. | 2015 | A&Z Agro Industries (Pvt) Limited. (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others.. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 13-SEP-21 | Yes | Search of premises under section 38 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, and section 175 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 278 | Const. P. 2665/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | No | To ascertain as to whether the respondent-Sindh Building Control Authority, has complied with the directions contained in the order dated 22.01.2019 passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid matter in its letter and spirit in respect of the issue of conversion of amenity plot for another use or otherwise. Let notice be issued to the respondents as well as to learned AAG for 04.05.2021 with direction to file comments. In view of the above position of the case; and, to ascertain the factual position of the subject premises, let at the first instance inspection of the subject premises be carried out by the Nazir of this Court strictly under law, after due notice to all concerned | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 279 | Const. P. 4658/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Muhammads Junaid Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | No | To appreciate as to whether the case of the petitioner falls within the ambit of Rule 11-A of 1974 or otherwise, let notice be issued to the respondents as well as to learned AAG for 27.05.2021with direction to file comments | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 280 | Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of ???Chairman-Board??? and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post-- | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 281 | Const. P. 6192/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | Yes | quo warranto | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 282 | Cr.Bail 919/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | TALHA S/O LIAQUAT ALI PARDAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-JUN-21 | No | Bail in ATA Case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 283 | Const. P. 673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 284 | Const. P. 366/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Muhammad Arsalan (Petitioner) VS NAB & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 285 | Const. P. 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Dr. Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 286 | Const. P. 1655/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Junaid Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 287 | Const. P. 2623/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 288 | Const. P. 1518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 289 | Const. P. 2608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Deepak (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 290 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 291 | Const. P. 1763/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 292 | Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abdul Razzaque (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 293 | Const. P. 2380/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Abdul Khaliq (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 294 | Const. P. 203/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2003 | Saifal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 295 | Suit 2970/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | SHUJABAD AGRO INDUSTRIES (PT.) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 04-MAR-22 | Yes | Policy-making by the CCI under Article 154(1) is in a different sphere than policy-making by the Federal Government in the exercise of its executive authority under Article 97. The Natural Gas Allocation & Management Policy, 2005 was within the legal competence of the Federal Government and not the CCI. Under the GSAs between the Plaintiffs and the SSGC, the Plaintiffs cannot assert a right to receive gas for industrial use during the months of December, January and February. Article 158 of the Constitution exists as a prerogative of a Provincial Government, and therefore it does not give actionable cause to a person other than the concerned Provincial Government to invoke the same. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 296 | Const. P. 1197/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Dr. Ali Murad Lajwani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 297 | Const. P. 1442/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muzaffar Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 298 | Const. P. 1167/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Jalaluddin Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 299 | Const. P. 1430/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mst Touqeer Fatima Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 300 | Family Appeal 1/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Naseer Ahmed Junejo (Applicant) VS Mst. Kainat Parveen Junejo (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-FEB-23 | No | No evidence of expenses of minors. No interference with judgment awarding maintenance | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 301 | Cr.Bail 1162/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | UBAIDULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 21-MAY-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 302 | Const. P. 614/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Adul Basit and others (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 303 | Const. P. 2760/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 06-MAY-22 | No | Test of public interest litigation. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 304 | Suit 1367/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shahryar (Plaintiff) VS Sheikh Muhammad Iqbal & other (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 16-MAY-22 | No | Enforcement of trademark under Customs Rules, 2001. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 305 | Spl.Cr.Rev. 85/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | DAWOOD UR REHMAN S/O HAFEEZ UR REHMAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-NOV-22 | No | Protection against retrospective punishment. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 306 | R.A (Civil Revision) 136/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2010 | Hyderabad Cantonment Board & Others (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-AUG-22 | No | Limitation not a measure technicality. Court bound to dismiss time-barred restoration application. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 307 | Const. P. 1835/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-22 | No | Encroachment in Katchi Abadis | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 308 | Const. P. 4941/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Syed Mureed Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 26-AUG-22 | No | No writ lies against contract by Bar council. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 309 | R.A (Civil Revision) 57/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Haji Mohammad Usman Memon (Applicant) VS Qurban Ali and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-FEB-23 | No | Section 21(e) Specific Relief Act, 1872. Section 36, Colonization & Disposal of Government Lands (Sindh) Act, 1912. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 310 | Suit 1529/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mohammad Ahmed Ansari (Plaintiff) VS Interglobe Commerce Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 13-JUN-22 | Yes | Lifting the veil of incorporation | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 311 | Cr.J.A 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | Assadullah Magsi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | ||||
| 312 | Const. P. 2789/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2011 | Mst. Hina Tunio and others (Petitioner) VS E.D.O Kamber and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-MAR-23 | No | Daily-wagers cannot be regularized. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 313 | R.A (Civil Revision) 137/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2019 | Muhammad Alam and Others. (Applicant) VS District officer community and others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 03-MAR-23 | Yes | Order XXI Rule 103 CPC | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 314 | Const. P. 1847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 315 | H.C.A 109/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Andaleeb Kamran (Appellant) VS Noreen Mughal and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-MAR-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 316 | Const. P. 190/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | A-One Laboratories and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 317 | Const. P. 4506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Mst. Shabana Noor (Petitioner) VS D.G Immigration & Passport & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 318 | H.C.A 285/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Mst. Nafeesa Siddiqui & others (Appellant) VS Danish Rafiq & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 16-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.1178-K/2018 Mst: Nafeesa Siddiqui and others v. Danish Rafique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed | ||
| 319 | Suit 1518/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | ANSAR ALI (Plaintiff) VS ALTAF AHMED MEMON & ANOTHER. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 320 | S.M.A 252/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Hutoxy Cowasjee and others (Petitioner) VS Null (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-MAY-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 321 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 66/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SHAKEEL S/O DODO KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 322 | Suit 1254/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mrs Naveen Irfan (Plaintiff) VS Mst Shama Parveen (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 03-SEP-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 323 | Civil Revision 20/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2018 | Assistant Manager NADRA and others (Applicant) VS Jumo (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-AUG-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 324 | Suit 905/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Aftab Hussain. (Plaintiff) VS Jay Kishan Phulwani. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 04-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 325 | Cr.Bail 1083/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | ARIF BALOCH S/O YAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-NOV-19 | Yes | Plea of alibi can be considered at the stage of bail. Rel: Zaigham Ashraf v. The State (2016 SCMR 18). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 326 | Civil Revision 30/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Mst. Hijab Akhtar (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 327 | Cr.Rev 201/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MST. NAGHMA IMJRAN WD/O IMRAN KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-DEC-19 | Yes | The Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C. entails that while the High Court can call for and examine the record of proceeding before a Magistrate, either suo moto or in Revision arising from an order of a Sessions Judge, a Revision ???application??? against the order of a Magistrate is to filed by the litigant to the Sessions Judge to whom the Magistrate is a Court ???inferior??? within the meaning of the Explanation clause of section 435 Cr.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 328 | Civil Revision 4/2005 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2005 | United Bank Limited (Applicant) VS Shoaib Ahmed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-AUG-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 329 | Criminal Miscelleneous 154/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MRS. FARHEEN W/O AURANGZEB MUHAMMAD KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-DEC-19 | Yes | 1. The ratio of the said judgments of the Supreme Court is that where the remedy under section 249-A Cr.P.C. is available before the trial Court, the High Court should not exercise inherent jurisdiction under section 561-A Cr.P.C except in extraordinary circumstances which warrant such an action. In other words, the question is not to the jurisdiction of the High Court, but the manner in which such jurisdiction is to be regulated by the High Court. Ref. Muhammad Farooq v. Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani (PLD 2016 SC 55); Maqbool Rehman v. State (2002 SCMR 1076); Bashir Ahmed v. Zafar-ul-Islam (PLD 2004 SC 298); Mian Munir Ahmad v. State (1985 SCMR 257). 2. It is a misconception to state that in all cases where it is being contended that a civil dispute has been converted into a criminal case, an applicant need not approach the trial Court under section 249-A Cr.P.C. or 265-K Cr.P.C. 3. The argument that section 249-A Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked until a formal charge is framed under section 242 Cr.P.C., is misconceived. Section 249-A Cr.P.C. categorically states that the power thereunder can be exercised ???at any stage of the case???. Rel. State v. Ashiq Ali Bhutto, 1993 SCMR 523. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 330 | Const. P. 178/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 331 | 2021 YLR Note 37 | Criminal Appeal 245/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | KARMAT HUSSAIN S/O MUBARAK HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 31-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Even in a case involving capital punishment, conviction can follow on circumstantial evidence, but that such circumstantial evidence should provide all links in an unbroken chain where one end of the chain touches the dead body and the other the neck of the accused. 2. Though evidence implicating an accused cannot be used to convict him if he was not confronted with it under section 342 Cr.P.C., but that does not mean to say that every inadequate examination under section 342 Cr.P.C. results in vitiating the trial, nor does it mean to say that the other independent evidence standing against the accused stands diminished. Rel. S.A.K. Rehmani v. The State (2005 SCMR 364). Even discarding the evidence not confronted to the accused under section 342 Cr.P.C., the chain of circumstantial evidence against him is complete and uninterrupted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||
| 332 | Cr.Bail 459/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | ASAD IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD ASHRAF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 29-APR-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 333 | J.M 49/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Iftikhar Ahmed Qureshi (Applicant) VS Mr. Muhammad Abrar Ahmed Qureshi & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Substituted service by way of publication is only presumed to be personal service by virtue of Rule 20(2) of Order V CPC. Such presumption is rebuttable. Therefore, where service by publication is challenged, the first test is to see whether the conditions of Order V Rule 20 CPC had been met, viz., that the publication was resorted to after the Court was satisfied that the defendant was avoiding service, or there was some other reason to believe that summons could not be served in the ordinary manner; in other words, whether the ordinary modes of service available had been exhausted. Rel: Muhammad Anwar v. Abdul Haq (1985 SCMR 1228); Haji Akbar v. Gul Baran (1996 SCMR 1703); and Nargis Latif v. Feroz Afaq Ahmed Khan (2001 SCMR 99). 2. While a courier???s receipt was filed to show that summons had been dispatched, there was no report of delivery by the courier to show that summons so dispatched were ???delivered??? or ???tendered??? within the meaning of Order V Rule 10 CPC. So far there is no statute that attaches a presumption of service to summons sent by a private courier service (as opposed to a public courier service). Rel: Inayatullah v. Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah (2014 SCMR 1477). Thus, it can be safely said that prior to publication neither the available modes of service were exhausted nor was there a verification that the modes of service so used had failed. In any case, the publication made was at best publication of the ???notice??? of the pending CMAs and there was no publication made of the ???summons??? of the suit. 3. Had it not been a case attracting section 12(2) CPC, the exparte judgment and decree could nonetheless be set-aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 334 | Const. P. 585/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Inayatullah & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 335 | Civil Revision 6/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2000 | Executive Engineer Highways and others (Applicant) VS Nazir Ahmed and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 27-AUG-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 336 | Const. P. 5036/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Ramsha Haider and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-DEC-20 | No | Reasons assigned to the short order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the MDCAT petitions viz. C.P. Nos.D-4953, 5036, 5158, 5237 of 2020 (challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020) by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 337 | Suit 1009/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Umair Shahab. (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 25-JUN-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 338 | Const. P. 5158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Dr. Waris Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-DEC-20 | No | Reasons assigned to the short order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the MDCAT petitions viz. C.P. Nos.D-4953, 5036, 5158, 5237 of 2020 (challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020) by Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.1302-K/2020 Dr.Waris Ali & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 339 | Const. P. 4953/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Peoples University of Medical & Health Sci (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-NOV-20 | No | Short order on MDCAT petitions decided by the Division Bench of Sindh High Court comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.1301-K/2020 Peoples University of Medical & Health Seiences for Womon & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 340 | 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 522 | Const. P. 4953/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Peoples University of Medical & Health Sci (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-DEC-20 | Yes | Reasons assigned to the short order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the MDCAT petitions viz. C.P. Nos.D-4953, 5036, 5158, 5237 of 2020 (challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020) by Division Bench of Sindh High Court comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.1301-K/2020 Peoples University of Medical & Health Seiences for Womon & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending |
| 341 | Const. P. 2743/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Mst. Alma Bibi Baran (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 342 | Const. P. 5025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 28-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 343 | Const. P. 2575/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Samiullah (Petitioner) VS Board of Trustees KPT and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 19-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 344 | Execution First Appeal 51/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | MENA ENERGY DMCC (Decree Holder) VS HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Judgment Debtor) | S.B. | Order | 12-OCT-21 | Yes | Execution of Foreign Decree. Judgment when conclusive under section 13 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 345 | Const. P. 1914/2020 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Along with other connected Petitions | 2020 | Amir Akbar Khan (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) | F.B. | Order | 26-APR-21 | Yes | Applicability of the regime of sections 204 and 91 Cr.P.C. to a Reference under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shamsuddin Abbasi | C.P.5188/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Amir Akbar Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded | |
| 346 | Suit 2581/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Mohsin Ahmad. (Plaintiff) VS Nasreen Irfan & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 01-JUL-21 | Yes | Stipulation in mortgage deed that mortgagee would become owner or vendee of the property if mortgage money is not paid, is a clog on the right/equity of redemption, repugnant to law and void. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 347 | Const. P. 2191/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Saeed Akhter (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-APR-21 | Yes | Primarily, this petition has served its purpose, which is disposed of in the terms, whereby the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to issue posting and transfer orders of the petitioner and the private respondent, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against them, strictly under the schedule of the establishment of law department KMC, with correct description/designation of their respective posts as per their entitlement under the law. The said exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks from the date of this order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 348 | Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 111/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl. Cr.A.T.A. No.112 of 2019 & Spl. Cr.A.T.A. No.113 of 2019 | 2019 | KAMRAN KHAN S/O DAWOOD KHAN & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 01-NOV-21 | No | Testimony of chance witness found unreliable. Recovery of firearms from accused also doubtful. Accused acquitted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 349 | Const. P. 907/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Nazim Taluka Municipal Administration Samaro & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 350 | Const. P. 503/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Vishandas (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 351 | Const. P. 446/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mst Irfana &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 352 | Const. P. 68/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2009 | Gulshan and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 353 | 2022 SBLR Sindh 505 | Const. P. 974/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Isra village Housing Scheme (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 354 | Const. P. 1478/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mst Hanifa Karim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 355 | Const. P. 944/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 21-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 356 | Const. P. 517/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Abid Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 357 | Const. P. 361/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 358 | Const. P. 1471/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Shahid Ahmed Khan Qaboolio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 359 | Const. P. 256/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 360 | Const. P. 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Asif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | "Shifting of SABZI MANDI - MARKET COMMITTEE" | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 361 | Const. P. 837/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Mir Munawar Ali Talpur (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 362 | Const. P. 1163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Altaf Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 363 | Const. P. 1523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 364 | Cr.Misc. 565/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Mst Badar Khatoon Sahito (Applicant) VS The State through AAG Sukkur & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 365 | Suit 1264/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | MUHAMMAD SHAKIR QURESHI (Plaintiff) VS AHMED ALI & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAR-22 | No | Receivership application dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 366 | Const. P. 996/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. P. No. D-755 of 2018 | 2018 | Zubair Ali Almani (Petitioner) VS The State through NAB & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 367 | Suit 1532/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Mrs. Umahani Fikree & another. (Plaintiff) VS Tewfiq Fikree. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-JAN-22 | No | Suit for possession without seeking declaration of title to immovable property is not maintainable, where the Defendant disputed such title. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 368 | Cr.J.A 92/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2013 | Mumraiz Khan Pathan & another (Appellant) VS The State. (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 369 | R.A (Civil Revision) 27/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Mumtaz Hussain & others (Applicant) VS Akhtar Hussain Abbasi & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 31-DEC-21 | No | Gift of mushaa | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 370 | Suit 474/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | All Pakistan Solvent Extractors Association & ors (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 11-MAY-22 | Yes | Quarantine pests. Pakistan Plant Quarantine Rules, 2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 371 | Const. P. 3461/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | M/s Quick Contractor & Traders (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-FEB-22 | No | Prime Movers. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 372 | II.A. 46/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Muhammad Amin (Appellant) VS Muhammad Nawaz (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 04-JUL-22 | No | Second Appeal Dismissed. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 373 | Suit -1500/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | ARY COMMUNICATIONS LTD (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 13-AUG-22 | No | ARY Communications versus PEMRA. Interim order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 374 | Suit 570/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Suit No. 1968 of 2021 | 2020 | Sadaquat Hussain (Plaintiff) VS Mrs. Shamim Ishaq (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 05-SEP-22 | No | Rent case cannot be stalled by a suit for specific performance by tenant. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 375 | Cr.Acq.A. 48/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2021 | Ali Akbar Mugheri (Appellant) VS Sadam Hussain Mugheri and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-23 | No | Courts generally do not interfere with double presumption of innocence unless find the reasoning in the impugned judgment to be perverse, arbitrary, foolish, artificial, speculative and ridiculous. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | |||
| 376 | Suit 1803/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Alongwith 181 connected suits. | 2020 | KARAM CERAMICS LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 21-FEB-23 | Yes | Challenge to the gas tariff issued under the OGRA Ordinance, the definition of Captive Power Plants and the Moratorium on the supply of gas to Captive Power Plants. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 377 | R.A (Civil Revision) 46/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2012 | EDO Roads Kashmore @ Kandhkot & others (Applicant) VS Abdul Hafeez Chachar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 30-JAN-23 | Yes | The courts can mould the relief within the scope of the provisions of Order VII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 ("C.P.C."), and are empowered to grant such relief as the justice may demand in the facts and circumstances of the case. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 378 | R.A (Civil Revision) 21/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2014 | Madadullah Alias Bakhshan Ahmadani (Applicant) VS Nisar Ahmed Ansari and Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-FEB-23 | No | Article 181 of the Limitation Act is applicable to application under section 12(2) C.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 379 | Conf.Case 15/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | The State (Appellant) VS Assadullah Magsi (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 14-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 380 | I. A 2/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2023 | Arsalan Ali @ Rameez Memon (Appellant) VS Zaheer Hussain Memon (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 381 | Criminal Miscelleneous 12/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Sajid Hussain and Another (Applicant) VS The State and Another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 15-MAR-23 | Yes | Transfer application under section 23 ATA, 1997. Jurisdiction of ATC under third schedule of the ATA, 1997 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 382 | R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2014 | Abdul Ghaffar Kakepoto (Applicant) VS Ahmed Ala Shah and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-FEB-23 | No | Effect of Aricle 79 of Qanun e Shahadat Order. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 383 | R.A (Civil Revision) 156/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Qadir Bux Soomro (Applicant) VS Moula Bux Soomro & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 384 | Criminal Appeal 68/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | MUHAMMAD IMRAN @ LAL S/O MUHAMMAD ALAM & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 28-MAR-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 385 | I. A 45/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Muhammad Ali Rashid (Appellant) VS M/S Unuted Bank Ltd & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-OCT-19 | Yes | The appellant cannot be made to suffer on these facts and circumstances when he had deposited the bid amount at the relevant time. The bid amount was in fact more than forced sale value evaluated by the consultant and declared in the sale proclamation to which no objections were raised. Thus there are enough material and reasons available to interfere with order passed by the Banking Court, which has no reason or logic. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 386 | S.M.A 247/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Mst.Faiza Muslim (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 387 | Suit 665/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2011 | M/S.VENUS PAKISTAN PVT LTD (Plaintiff) VS M/S.SUPREME FUEL GMBH CO & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-APR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 388 | H.C.A 185/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Dr. Obaid ur Rehman & Others (Appellant) VS Mrs. Neelofer Khalid & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.A.31-K/2019 Mrs. Neelofer Khalid and others v. Dr.Obaid-ur-Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Adjourned | ||
| 389 | Suit 1572/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2010 | Zahid Hussain (Plaintiff) VS United Bank Limited & another (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 390 | Const. P. 1702/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | Federation of Pakistan & another. (Petitioner) VS Official Assignee & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 17-JUN-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 391 | H.C.A 332/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Arshad Mahmud & another (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-OCT-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 392 | Const. P. 2304/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Meezan Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Textilers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 393 | S.M.A 199/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Nuzhat Jameela (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 01-MAR-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 394 | Suit -9/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muhammad Afzal (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 02-MAR-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 395 | Const. P. 354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-OCT-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.704-K/2019 Muneer Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed for Non-Prosecution | ||
| 396 | J.M 74/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2015 | Maula Bakhsh. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Abrar Ahmed & Others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 02-MAR-20 | Yes | 1. Substituted service by way of publication is only presumed to be personal service by virtue of Rule 20(2) of Order V CPC. Such presumption is rebuttable. Therefore, where service by publication is challenged, the first test is to see whether the conditions of Order V Rule 20 CPC had been met, viz., that the publication was resorted to after the Court was satisfied that the defendant was avoiding service, or there was some other reason to believe that summons could not be served in the ordinary manner; in other words, whether the ordinary modes of service available had been exhausted. Rel: Muhammad Anwar v. Abdul Haq (1985 SCMR 1228); Haji Akbar v. Gul Baran (1996 SCMR 1703); and Nargis Latif v. Feroz Afaq Ahmed Khan (2001 SCMR 99). 2. While a courier???s receipt was filed to show that summons had been dispatched, there was no report of delivery by the courier to show that summons so dispatched were ???delivered??? or ???tendered??? within the meaning of Order V Rule 10 CPC. So far there is no statute that attaches a presumption of service to summons sent by a private courier service (as opposed to a public courier service). Rel: Inayatullah v. Syed Khursheed Ahmed Shah (2014 SCMR 1477). Thus, it can be safely said that prior to publication neither the available modes of service were exhausted nor was there a verification that the modes of service so used had failed. In any case, the publication made was at best publication of the ???notice??? of the pending CMAs and there was no publication made of the ???summons??? of the suit. 3. Had it not been a case attracting section 12(2) CPC, the exparte judgment and decree could nonetheless be set-aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 397 | Criminal Appeal 486/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | MUHAMMAD KASHIF S/O SHER MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-FEB-20 | Yes | The test for weighing the evidence of identification proceedings is to first assess the ???system variables???, i.e. the precautions taken at the test identification parade, and then to assess the ???estimator variables??? i.e. the capacity and ability of the eye-witness to identify the accused in the circumstance of the case. Rel. Mian Sohail Ahmed v. The State (2019 SCMR 956) and The matter of Kanwar Anwaar Ali (PLD 2019 SC 488). | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 398 | Civil Revision 88/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2002 | Syed Shahan Shah @ Syed Nasrullah Shah (Applicant) VS Syed Amanullah Shah and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 399 | Const. P. 1158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Rehan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-NOV-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 400 | R.A (Civil Revision) 16/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2010 | Shahnawaz and another (Applicant) VS Shabbir Ahmed Memon and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 18-JAN-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 401 | Suit 547/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2007 | TRADING CORP. OF PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD. (Plaintiff) VS ADAM SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 12-MAY-20 | No | Objection to Arbitration Award was that where compensation was awarded on the basis of a sum stipulated in a clause of the contract, then further compensation on basis of similar clauses could not have been declined by arbitrators. Held: arbitrators had found that none of the parties committed breach of contract; thus amount awarded by arbitrators was not as compensation under section 74 of the Contract Act but on an equitable consideration of the matter to which the Defendant had not objected. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 402 | 2022 PLC CS 197 | H.C.A 163/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | National Refinery Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Syed Niaz Ahmed (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-NOV-19 | Yes | The terms of the service were ensured at the time of his (respondent's) transfer, which cannot be lifted unilaterally depriving an employee of his post-retirement benefits or any of the terms of transfer, to which he was entitled at the time when he was inducted/transferred. The transfer confirmation letter dated 08.03.1992 does suggest variance in Scheme for employees but the boards decision has prospective application as far as lifting of any beneficial arrangements are concerned. Wisdom should have prevailed at the time when employees were being transferred and not at the twilight of their career when they (employees) only hoped to get their retirement benefits.. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.711-K/2019 National Refinery Ltd another v. Syed Niaz Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed |
| 403 | Suit 1494/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2008 | M/S.CENTURY INSURANCE CO.LTD (Plaintiff) VS THE ASSITANT COLELCTOR (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 30-NOV-20 | Yes | Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. Maintainability of suit to challenge an action taken without issuing the prescribed show-cause notice. Rate of Federal Excise Duty applicable to insurance services under section 10 of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 and the effect of Rule 40 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 404 | Civil Revision 93/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2009 | Kehar son of Sanwal (Applicant) VS Changoo Mal son of Juman Dass and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 05-DEC-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 405 | Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-21 | Yes | Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`) | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 406 | Const. P. 2805/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Dr. Shamim Qureshi (Petitioner) VS J.S.M.U and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-APR-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 407 | Suit 618/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2012 | ABDULLAH RAFI (Plaintiff) VS DIRECTOR PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX & OTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 12-FEB-21 | Yes | Sindh Entertainment Duty Act, 1958 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 408 | Const. P. 3100/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 29-APR-21 | Yes | whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards? | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 409 | 2021 PLC (CS) Note 11 | Const. P. 756/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | S.M Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 28-OCT-19 | Yes | It is the general principle of jurisprudence that the law takes its effect from the date of promulgation and ???interpretation of the said law??? cannot be subjected to the doctrine of retrospective effects unless expressed specifically in the judgment, therefore, Mustafa Impex???s case is to be applied prospectively, in general. It is the existence of law at the relevant time that counts, which may have been interpreted at a later date. Since the deficiency in the appointment notification as far as Provincial Cabinet is concerned, is not questioned no challenge could be thrown. The principle we derive from the conclusion of the aforesaid three judgments is that Mustafa Impex only invalidates those actions retrospectively which were impugned in that lis and not all others, so by virtue of aforesaid principle the notification for the appointment of the petitioner is saved whereas it set a mechanism for future course i.e. issuance of impugned notification. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.724-K/2019 Province of Sindh and others v. S.M Kaleem Makki,C.P.41-K/2020 S.M Kaleem Makki v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed as Infructuous,Pending Dismissed as Not Pressed |
| 410 | Const. P. 984/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Saleem Nagori S/o Muhammad Yousuf Nagori (Petitioner) VS Zahid Hussain and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-APR-21 | No | Rent: Default and personal need. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 411 | Suit 2345/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | FAREED YOUNUS & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS MUHAMMAD NAEEM & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-21 | No | When matter can be addressed by an injunction, no need to appoint Receiver. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 412 | Const. P. 8126/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Riaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-SEP-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 413 | Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 414 | Const. P. 2094/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Zahida Quadri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 23-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 415 | Suit 1608/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Seamax Marine Services (Plaintiff) VS The Ministry of Maritime Affairs & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUL-21 | Yes | Rule 48 of Public Procurement Rules, 2004. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 416 | Cr.Bail 524/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | RAJA MUSHTAQ AHMED S/O RAJA JAN ALAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-JUL-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 417 | Const. P. 2210/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Syed Chuttal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Chairman Pakistan Railways and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 418 | Const. P. 1059/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2014 | Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-OCT-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.635-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Education & Literacy Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed | ||
| 419 | Const. P. 4003/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Learned / Hon (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | Yes | the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakistan International Airline Company to allow joining period to them till 13.06.2019. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 420 | Criminal Appeal 565/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | WAKEEL S/O ABDUL GHAFOOR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-SEP-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 421 | Const. P. 1644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Nawaz Murad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 27-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 422 | Const. P. 532/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Muhammad Arif & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 423 | Const. P. 894/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2011 | Muhammad Rafique and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 424 | Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 425 | Const. P. 1619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mst Shumaila & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 426 | Const. P. 1523/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 427 | Const. P. 2724/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2017 | Abdul Sattar Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 428 | Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 11-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 429 | Const. P. 3310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Imamdin and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 430 | Const. P. 254/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Mir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 24-NOV-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 431 | Const. P. 2296/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 432 | Civil Revision 116/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2002 | Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 02-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 433 | Const. P. 1133/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2015 | Muhammad [email protected] another (Petitioner) VS Learned Civil Judge & JM NolI-Matli (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-MAY-16 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 434 | Suit 298/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | M/s. Dalda Foods Ltd (Plaintiff) VS Federation of Pakistan & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 18-APR-22 | No | Audit notice under section 25 Sales Tax Act, 1990, un-lawful in absence of reasons. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 435 | Const. P. 7648/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Pakistan Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 17-FEB-22 | No | section 87(b) of the Cantonments Act, 1924 is not mandatory. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 436 | Const. P. 115/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | Syed Parvez Ali Shah Lakyari (Petitioner) VS Mst. Benazir & Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 09-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 437 | Const. P. 1666/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Nanjo Mal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 438 | Suit 891/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | MST. FEHMIDA BEGUM (Plaintiff) VS MATI-UR-RAHMAN & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-SEP-22 | Yes | Stranger to an arbitration award cannot file objections. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 439 | Cr.Rev 9/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2023 | Muhammad Yar Khoso and Another (Applicant) VS The State and Another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 06-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 440 | Criminal Appeal 39/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Ghulam Nabi @ Naboo @ Nabi Bux Machhi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-JAN-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 441 | Const. P. 764/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Inayatullah Lashari (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 08-FEB-23 | Yes | Employee engaged on adhoc or under a time-bound contract has no vested right to regularization | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||
| 442 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 4/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 5 of 2011, SCRA No. 6 of 2011 & SCRA No. 7 of 2011 | 2011 | Additional Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s K.S.Sulemanji Esmailji and Sons 9 (Pvt) Ltd (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-SEP-22 | No | Member Judicial sitting singly can decide a question of classification. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 443 | R.A (Civil Revision) 84/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2020 | Agha Altaf Nabi and an other. (Applicant) VS Agha Abdul Nabi and others. (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 12-JAN-23 | No | Scope of bar to fresh suit under Order 23 Rule 1 (3) C.P.C. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 444 | Const. P. 153/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Punhal Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst Parveen (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 27-FEB-23 | No | No evidence of expenses of minors. No interference with judgment awarding maintenance. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 445 | Const. P. 3525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 30-OCT-17 | Yes | Board of Trustees were required to convene a meeting and the petitioners agreed. The petition was disposed off accordingly. It perhaps on an interpretation of order dated 18.12.2017 that the Board of Trustees resolved to approve the upgradation of the petitioner as Executive Director as if it was an order of this Court, which Board of Trustees decision was subsequently withdrawn. The alleged contemnor may have stated that the upgradation was allowed but it was only the statement of the Counsel that was recorded. Neither the withdrawal nor review of earlier decision taken in 118th Meeting could constitute contempt as there was no straightaway direction for up-gradation of the post from Assistant Director to Executive Director. The issue was to be resolved by the Board of Trustees of EOBI | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Dismissed as Withdrawn | |
| 446 | Suit 195/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | MRS. SURIYA IQBAL CHISHTI (Plaintiff) VS MRS. RUBINA MAJIDULLA & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 27-SEP-21 | No | Revocation of Gift. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 447 | H.C.A 85/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS WALIA Steel Industries PLC & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 07-MAY-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.2407/2019 SAGA Shipping & Trading Corporation Ltd & others v. WALIA Steel Industries & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed | ||
| 448 | H.C.A 217/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS G-Force Communicaton & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 05-APR-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.385-K/2019 G.Force Communications and others v. Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and another,C.A.12-K/2020 G.Force Communications and others v. Dawlance Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned | ||
| 449 | S.M.A 68/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Dr.Mohammad Sharif (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 23-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 450 | Const. P. 858/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Irshad Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 15-FEB-19 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 451 | Cr.Bail 293/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2016 | Ali Murad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JUN-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 452 | H.C.A 404/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | MCB Bank Ltd. (Appellant) VS Sajida Naqi Riaz & others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 12-OCT-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 453 | Suit 203/2002 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2002 | ADVOCATE GENERAL SINDH (Plaintiff) VS ISLAMIC EDUCATION TRUST & ORS. (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 07-AUG-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 454 | S.M.A 312/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Sobia Jasim (Petitioner) VS Jasim Rasool - Deceased (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-FEB-18 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 455 | Civil Revision 64/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2003 | Muhammad Sulleman Mughal (Applicant) VS Niaz Ahmed Dahar and another (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-SEP-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | C.P.388-K/2014 Niaz Ahmed Dahar v. Muhammad Suleman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Disposed Dismissed | ||
| 456 | Cr.Bail 1649/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | KARIM GUL S/O FAQIR MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 25-NOV-19 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 457 | Suit 346/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Dr. Ayaz Hussain Khaskheli & Others. (Plaintiff) VS Ms. Shahila Perveen. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 17-FEB-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 458 | Civil Revision 23/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Syed Najamuddin Shah & others (Applicant) VS Divisional Forest Officer & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 459 | Suit 2256/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2018 | Humayun Sattar. (Plaintiff) VS Faizan Elahi & another. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-MAR-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 460 | Const. P. 51/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2019 | Muhammad Paryal & An Other (Petitioner) VS Atta Muhammad & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 14-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 461 | Suit 172/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Furqan & others. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Roshan Ara & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 09-JUN-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 462 | Const. P. 4953/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Peoples University of Medical & Health Sci (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 11-NOV-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.1301-K/2020 Peoples University of Medical & Health Seiences for Womon & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | ||
| 463 | Const. P. 4953/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Peoples University of Medical & Health Sci (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 16-OCT-20 | No | Interim orders passed by Sindh High Court Division Bench comprising Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry for the MDCAT entry test in the petitions challenging the vires of Pakistan Medical Commission Act, 2020 | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | C.P.1301-K/2020 Peoples University of Medical & Health Seiences for Womon & others v. Pakistan Ministry of Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan | Pending | |
| 464 | Civil Revision 22/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2012 | Ghulam Mustafa Malak (Applicant) VS Divisional Forest Officer & ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-OCT-20 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 465 | Const. P. 2556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Hafiz Syed Naveed Qamar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 12-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 466 | Const. P. 2757/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Dr. Yahya Khan Tunio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 467 | Const. P. 2625/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | Shell Pakistan Employees Union (Petitioner) VS NIRC & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 22-APR-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 468 | Const. P. 983/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Muhammad Iqbal Yousuf S/o Muhammad Yousuf Nagori (Petitioner) VS Zahid Hussain and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 26-APR-21 | No | Rent: Default and personal need. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 469 | Suit 1234/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2017 | Muhammad Naeed. (Plaintiff) VS Abdul Karim Rathor & Others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 21-JUN-21 | No | When matter can be addressed by an injunction, no need to appoint Receiver. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 470 | Const. P. 5430/2020 (F.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2020 | Imad Samad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) | F.B. | Judgement | 10-SEP-21 | Yes | - Import of vintage cars on the strength of SRO No.833(I)/2018 dated 03.07.2018 followed by a decision in the case of Moin Jamal Abbasi in CP No.D-4124 of 2019 reported as 2020 PTD 660. --Full Bench was constituted to consider the question arising out of litigation:- Whether the subject SRO No.833(I)/2018 issued in terms of Section 19 of Customs Act, 1969 can also be treated as SRO issued by the Ministry of Commerce in terms of Section 3 of the Import & Export Control Act, 1950, permitting import of vintage cars which are otherwise not importable as being old and used in terms of the Import Policy Order of both 2016 and 2020. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro | |||
| 471 | Const. P. 580/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2013 | Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 21-OCT-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 472 | Const. P. 201/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2003 | Nabi Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 473 | Conf.Case 23/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Hassan @ Ali Hassan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 02-DEC-21 | Yes | The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 474 | Const. P. 1769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 24-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 475 | Const. P. 943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2021 | S & Sons Contractor (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 09-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 476 | I. A 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Intra Court Appeal No.01 of 2019 [Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited versus Saleem Ahmed Memon] | 2019 | Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 30-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 477 | Const. P. 335/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2014 | Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 03-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 478 | Const. P. 437/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Mst. Hawa & Ors (Petitioner) VS National Highway Authority & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 26-OCT-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 479 | Const. P. 1216/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Martha Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 480 | Const. P. 1261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2020 | Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 14-DEC-21 | Yes | It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Hon???ble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 481 | Const. P. 1348/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2018 | Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 10-NOV-21 | Yes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 482 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 5/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Shahzad & another (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 23-FEB-22 | Yes | Confiscation of vehicle under Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, 1969. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 483 | Suit -3324/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2021 | M/S METRO INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL (PVT) LTD & OTHERS (Plaintiff) VS SINDH BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORIY(S.B.C.A) & ANOTHER (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 25-JAN-22 | No | Use of residential plot for school without conversion under KBTPR, 2002 is unlawful. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 484 | Suit 2041/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Haroon Abdullah (Plaintiff) VS Pakistan Airline Pilots (Defendant) | S.B. | Judgement | 16-FEB-22 | No | PALPA Elections. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 485 | Const. P. 1043/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2018 | Khadim Hussain Aradin & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 13-JUN-18 | No | water issue | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 486 | Suit 1731/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | M/s Kaim Khani & Brother (Plaintiff) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 31-JAN-22 | No | Return of Plaint. Scope of section 120 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 487 | Criminal Appeal 94/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2011 | Akbar @ Bangul (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 20-JUN-18 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 488 | Spl.Cr.Bail 15/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Spl. Criminal Bail Applications No. 16 of 2022 [Sanjay Kumar v. The State] | 2022 | HARESH KUMAR S/O GOBINDAR KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-APR-22 | No | Section 2(s) Customs Act, 1969 ??? Bail Granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 489 | Spl.Cr.Bail 4/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | MUHAMMAD WASIF S/O MUHAMMAD SADIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-APR-22 | No | Offence of Smuggling ??? Bail Granted. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 490 | Const. P. 369/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur | 2015 | Ahmed Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) VS P. O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 08-OCT-20 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 491 | Suit 1634/2009 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2009 | Mst. Humera Jabeen & Ors (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad Arshad & Ors (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 30-MAR-22 | Yes | Principles of recusals of a Judge. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 492 | Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 371/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2016 | Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Quick Contractors & Traders (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-FEB-22 | No | Prime Movers. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 493 | II.A. 77/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Shamsher Ali (Appellant) VS Abdul Jabbar & others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 22-AUG-22 | No | Only a single indivisible transaction is envisaged for enforcing part performance under section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 494 | R.A (Civil Revision) 303/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2016 | Muhammad Yamin & Ors (Applicant) VS Muhammad Saleh & Ors (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 01-SEP-22 | No | Title of predecessor never proved, hence mis-reading of evidence. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 495 | Suit 1256/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2019 | Eaton Phonenixtec MMPL Co., LTD (Plaintiff) VS Messrs. New Rabia Enterprises (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 22-NOV-22 | Yes | Plea of equitable set-off in defense to Order XII Rule 6 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 496 | Election Appeal 2/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Muhammad Jawed S/o Muhammad Anwer (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Judgement | 22-AUG-22 | No | Election Appeal NA-246 KARACHI, SOUTH-I | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 497 | Const. P. 7075/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Ghulam Ali Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-DEC-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 498 | Const. P. 1835/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2019 | Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 10-AUG-22 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | ||||
| 499 | II.A. 7/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Mohammad Rafique Aghani (Appellant) VS Mohammad Ali Aghani and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | The requirement of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is that if a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least have been called for the purpose of proving its execution, if there be two attesting witnesses alive, and subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. There is a proviso for a registered document, but that is not relevant for the present purposes | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | |||
| 500 | II.A. 7/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Mohammad Rafique Aghani (Appellant) VS Mohammad Ali Aghani and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 26-JAN-23 | Yes | The requirement of Article 79 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 is that if a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be used as evidence until two attesting witnesses at least have been called for the purpose of proving its execution, if there be two attesting witnesses alive, and subject to the process of the Court and capable of giving evidence. There is a proviso for a registered document, but that is not relevant for the present purposes. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 501 | II.A. 36/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad | 2012 | Qadir Bux Samoon (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 16-DEC-21 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry | ||||
| 502 | M.A. 53/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | Clover Pakistan Limited (Appellant) VS Executive Director, Onsite Deptt SECP Islamabad (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 28-JUN-22 | No | Order of Registrar of Appellate Bench SECP appealable before said bench. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 503 | Spl.Cr.Misc 652/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2022 | OMER DANIAL BAWEJA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 07-NOV-22 | No | Where two Courts have coextensive or concurrent jurisdiction, then in ordinary circumstances the rule of propriety demanded that the jurisdiction of the lower Court be invoked first; and that the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court should not be exercised as a routine but only in extraordinary circumstances. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 504 | Criminal Appeal 48/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2022 | Ali Gul Magsi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) | D.B. | Judgement | 22-FEB-23 | No | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) | ||||
| 505 | R.A (Civil Revision) 56/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Qurban Ali and another (Applicant) VS Ghulam Rasool and others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 20-FEB-23 | No | Section 21(e) Specific Relief Act, 1872. Section 36, Colonization & Disposal of Government Lands (Sindh) Act, 1912. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 506 | Succession Appeal 2/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2015 | Mst. Bibi Sakina (Appellant) VS Bibi Nawab Zadi and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 10-FEB-23 | No | Succession proceedings do not constitute declaration of status of legal heir. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 507 | R.A (Civil Revision) 31/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2016 | Hakim Ali Deepar and another (Applicant) VS Imtiaz Ali Deepar and Others (Respondent) | S.B. | Order | 17-MAR-23 | No | Presumption of correctness in old revenue entries. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 508 | Suit 360/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi | 2013 | GHULAM ALI ALLANA (Plaintiff) VS LOUIS DREYFUS COMMODITIES SUISSEE SA & OTHERS (Defendant) | S.B. | Order | 06-MAR-23 | Yes | Test for attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) | |||
| 509 | Const. P. 125/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana | 2023 | M/S United Cargo Good Transport Co. (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) | D.B. | Order | 01-MAR-23 | No | Customs. release of smuggled goods. | Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi | |||