Export
Report-002 AFR

Note: The figures in the following table only show the number of important Judgements/Orders uploaded on this site. It does not reflect total disposal of the Hon'ble Judges.

Apex Court: Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan, Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan:

Show Only Authored Judgements/Orders

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon

High Court of Sindh, Principal Seat Karachi, Bench at Sukkur, Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana
S.No. Citation Case No. Case Year Parties Bench Type Order/Judgment Order_Date A.F.R Head Notes/ Tag Line Bench Apex Court Apex Status
1 Const. P. 3598/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.254-K/2013 Muhammad Fareed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.202-K/2013 Muhammad Fareed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Allowed
2 2019 PLC (CS) 1483 Const. P. 2508/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Aftab Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3 Const. P. 557/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Salman Aziz (Petitioner) VS Federal Urdu Unviersity and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4 Cr.Bail 360/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 BABER JAMEEL S/O MUNSIF KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5 2018 PLD Sindh 657 Const. P. 1837/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Arif Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.852/2018 Muhammad Arif Akhtar & others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ
6 2018 PLC (CS) Note 129 Const. P. 4479/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.536-K/2017 Muhammad Imran Khan Chishti v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
7 2018 CLC Note 56 Const. P. 1784/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Indu (Petitioner) VS VIIth ADJ Karachi South & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.444-K/2017 Dr. Indu v. Additional District & Sessions Judge, No-7, South, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
8 2017 SBLR Sindh 1213 Const. P. 1435/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mehboob Shah Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1854/2017 Mehboob Shah Khan and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
9 Const. P. 5608/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mansoor ul Haq Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.859-K/2016 Pakistan Automobile Corporation Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Industries and Production and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
10 Const. P. 4716/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.612-K/2018 Asif Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
11 2018 YLR 503 Cr.Bail 918/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD AKRAM S/O MAQSOOD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.P.68-K/2017 Muhammad Akram v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
12 2019 PLC (CS) 1245 Const. P. 2598/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rashid Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
13 2018 MLD 1533 Cr.Rev 184/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 JAVED S/O SOFAN ARFANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
14 Const. P. 4348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
15 Const. P. 5600/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Wajid Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Provice of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
16 Const. P. 332/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
17 Const. P. 4666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Arif Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
18 Cr.Rev 174/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 KANWAR NAVEED JAMIL S/O KANWAR JAMIL AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
19 Const. P. 7782/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1783/2017 Mukhtiar Ahmed Chachar v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
20 Const. P. 1798/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Petitioner) VS D.G Ports & Shipping and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.526-K/2017 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Guarantee) Ltd. v. D.G. (Port & Shipping) and others,C.A.62-K/2019 Pakistan Stevedoring Conference (Guarantee) Ltd. v. D.G. (Port & Shipping) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
21 Const. P. 196/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nayab Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hameeda Bano & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.460-K/2017 Nayab Ali v. Mst: Hameeda Bano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
22 Const. P. 1746/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Fateh Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
23 Const. P. 1095/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
24 Const. P. 1098/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) VS Aamir Noor & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
25 Const. P. 2162/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hanif and another (Petitioner) VS Rahim Bux & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
26 Const. P. 393/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ameer Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
27 Const. P. 2342/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Feroz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.204-K/2013 Feroze Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.256-K/2013 Feroze Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed
28 Const. P. 862/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Jami (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Petitioner seeking relief that her husband was employee of Government of Sindh as Naib qasid died on 11-05-2012 during Service .Petitioner approached to concerned for pension &other benefits but no response and only Gratuity fund RS 38250/received. Respondent for the state appeared and argued that he was appointed on 20-08-1995 and he terminated from his job on 01-11-1995. However, he was reinstated on 21-03-2009,and he died on 11-05-2012 and not completed Service minimum required for pension & others therefore ,he is not entitled to pension. It was held that Rule 275 of Sindh Civil Service Regulations makes clear clear that he is entitled for family pension. He is also fully entitled for family pension and Salary of the intervening Period as provided under the Law rule 152 of Sindh Service rules. Respondent is directed to re calculated the family pension of intervening period and deposit the same in this court. Petition is disposed of with above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
29 Const. P. 730/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 M/s. Muhammadi Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
30 Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Raza Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Home Department, Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.382-K/2019 Salman Tahir and others v. Secy: Home Deptt: Govt.of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
31 Cr.Bail 1194/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jawaid Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
32 2020 PLC (CS) Note 17 Const. P. 2461/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Shahzadi Anam Fayaz Rajput (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
33 Const. P. 174/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
34 2021 PCr.LJ 242 Cr.Misc. 766/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Khalid Hussain & others (Applicant) VS Asif Iqbal & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
35 Const. P. 2209/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Khan Muhammad and another (Petitioner) VS Rasheed Khan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
36 Const. P. 3173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rafi Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
37 Const. P. 6090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) VS The Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.386-K/2020 Dr. Farrukh Mirza v. The Secretary Finance Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
38 Const. P. 3170/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Aliya Shabnam (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
39 Const. P. 291/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
40 Const. P. 325/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Munawar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
41 Const. P. 633/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Narsingh Das (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
42 Const. P. 2912/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zafar Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4404/2019 Zafar Akbar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Information, Government of Pakisan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
43 Const. P. 3245/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
44 Const. P. 3973/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Prof. Dr. Wahid Bux Soomro (Petitioner) VS Chansellor QAUEST and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
45 Const. P. 6313/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sohail Akhtar Alvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
46 Cr.Bail 1880/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 HASNAIN AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
47 2017 SBLR Sindh 443 Const. P. 5176/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Muhammad Shoaib (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.121-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Syed Muhammad Sohaib and others,C.P.599-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Shoaib and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
48 Const. P. 2289/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Raja Pervez Iqbal and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.588-K/2017 Raja Pervez Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
49 Const. P. 1820/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shahid Ali Bhutto & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.572-K/2018 Shahid Ali Bhutto and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
50 2018 SBLR Sindh 128, 2019 PLC (CS) 2013 Const. P. 1377/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Akmal Hussain (Petitioner) VS Secretary Establishment Government of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.14-K/2018 Akmal Hussain v. The Secy: Estabishment Div. Govt. of Pakistan, Islambad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
51 Const. P. 2323/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Sultan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
52 Const. P. 133/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Taj Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh through Secretary Live Stock & Fisheries (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
53 Const. P. 320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Aqil Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi & other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
54 Const. P. 1498/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ashfaque Ahmed Rajpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
55 Const. P. 1719/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zeeshan Ayoub Pathan, (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
56 Const. P. 4000/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Prof: Dr. Parveen (Petitioner) VS Chancellor University of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
57 Const. P. 5295/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Akhtar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Prof: Murtaza Hassan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
58 Const. P. 209/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Alman and others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
59 Const. P. 537/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aziz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
60 Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
61 Const. P. 4000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Javed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
62 Const. P. 188/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
63 Const. P. 446/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoub Afridi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.221-K/2019 Muhammad Ayoub Afridi v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: Water & Power and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
64 Cr.Appeal 181/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ashraf (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
65 Const. P. 2034/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mir Asghar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.413-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Mir Asghar Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
66 2018 SBLR Sindh 524 Const. P. 1547/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aamir Jamil (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.663-K/2017 Aamir Jamil v. University of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
67 Const. P. 4442/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Ehsan Ali Palari (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2781/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
68 Const. P. 333/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Zeeshan Ifthikar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
69 Const. P. 5818/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.298-K/2015 Noor Jahan Mangi v. National Accountability Bureau Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
70 Const. P. 137/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
71 Const. P. 141/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
72 Const. P. 307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
73 Const. P. 2237/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Aijaz Kazi (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
74 Const. P. 1547/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Naqash Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
75 2019 PLC (CS) 882 Const. P. 3408/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Zafar Iqbal Zahid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.554-K/2018,C.P.555-K/2018,C.P.559-K/2018,C.P.562-K/2018,C.P.560-K/2018,C.P.553-K/2018,C.P.557-K/2018,C.P.558-K/2018,C.P.556-K/2018,C.P.561-K/2018 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
76 Cr.Bail 704/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MST. IMTIAZ LATIF @ NIHA GUL NAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
77 2019 PLC (CS) 999 H.C.A 239/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Allah Dino Khaskheli (Appellant) VS Zakir Mehmood & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.14-K/2019 Allah Dino Khaskheli v. Zakir Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
78 Const. P. 8147/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
79 Const. P. 6803/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mian Dad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1102-K/2018 Mian Dad v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
80 Const. P. 714/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Msr Mehfooza Bano (Petitioner) VS M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1480-K/2018 Mehfooz Bano v. M/s Haji Ahmed Memorial Dispensary & Meternity Home and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
81 Const. P. 7035/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahnawaz Babar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
82 Const. P. 3467/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 Yes At this juncture, counsel for College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan (CPSP) contends that this is their complete prerogative and within the line of guidelines provided by the then PMDC (PMC) and they have to select examiners as per criterion from all universities. At this juncture, learned counsel for contemnors by one voice contends that Dr. Naveed Ahmed has not been recommended since 2011 by the JPMC. In view of the above, we are of the considered view that contempt application is not maintainable, hence, same is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
83 Const. P. 3316/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Indus Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3239/2018 Indus Dyeing & Maufacturing Co. Ltd v. Government of SIndh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Recource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.93-K/2019 Indus Dyeing & Maufacturing Co. Ltd v. Government of SIndh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Recource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
84 Const. P. 4620/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nisra Ahmed Shaikh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
85 Const. P. 887/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Fashion Knits Ind. (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
86 Const. P. 946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Lucky Knits Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3077/2018 M/s. Lucky Knits Private Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.83-K/2019 M/s. Lucky Knits Private Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
87 Const. P. 6870/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
88 Const. P. 6291/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Capt: Abrar Arif (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Maritime Ministry & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
89 Const. P. 6701/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
90 Const. P. 2722/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
91 Const. P. 8102/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Riaz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
92 Const. P. 803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Tanzeel-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.124-K/2019 Tanzeel-ur-Rehman Khan Niazi v. Govt. of Sindh thr.Secy: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
93 Const. P. 7087/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Fahad (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
94 Const. P. 1360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Adil Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
95 Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
96 H.C.A 348/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ayub Khan (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
97 Const. P. 6384/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Engr. Jehanzaib (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
98 Const. P. 5613/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1603/2017 Abdul Qayoom v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.P.3668/2017 Abdul Qayoom v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
99 Const. P. 2821/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Fida Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.213-K/2020 The Trustees of the Port of Karachi thr. its Chairman v. Fida Muhammad Khan and others,C.A.47-K/2022 The Trustees of the Port of Karachi thr. its Chairman v. Fida Muhammad Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
100 Const. P. 5424/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
101 Const. P. 5736/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
102 Const. P. 3411/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Civil Aviation Authority (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
103 2018 PLC CS 462 H.C.A 268/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Moula Bux Khatian (Appellant) VS SSGC Ltd. & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.699-K/2017 Moula Bux Khatain v. The Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
104 Const. P. 6357/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imdad Hussain Mirani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
105 Const. P. 3486/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Jawaid Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1435-K/2018 Javed Alam v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Inter Provincial Co-Ordanation Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
106 Const. P. 3482/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sher Muhammad Zafar & Others (Petitioner) VS PIAC & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
107 Const. P. 4859/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Khalil Ahmed Jalil and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.513-K/2018 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others,C.A.328/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chairman/CEO and another v. Khalil Ahmed Jalil and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 2 weeks a/w C.A.34-K/2019 etc,Pending Adjourned for December, 24.
108 2018 CLC 1221 H.C.A 137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s. Rahat & Company (Appellant) VS Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.649-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan,C.A.91-K/2017 M/s Rahat & Company thr. Syed Naveed Hussain Shah v. Trading Corporation of Pakistan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
109 Const. P. 4666/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Afaq A. Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
110 Const. P. 4058/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aijaz Ahmed Kalhoro & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
111 2019 PLC (CS) 1209 Const. P. 4132/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shahnawaz Khatri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
112 2018 CLC 443 II.A. 97/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Saleh Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst.Rahima Bai & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.84-K/2017 Mst: Rahima Bai and others v. Saleh Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
113 Const. P. 507/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nawaz Ali Jatt (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
114 Const. P. 2863/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Pir Kaleemullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.643-K/2018 Pir Kalimullah and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Cheif Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
115 Const. P. 2438/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 P.P.L Officers and Associates & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.681-K/2017 Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association thr. its Chairman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
116 Const. P. 1662/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Uris and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
117 Const. P. 8502/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Major (R) Muhammad Nawaz Gondal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
118 H.C.A 149/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. (Appellant) VS Inam Hafiz (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
119 Const. P. 3940/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Atlas Enterprises and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
120 Const. P. 6194/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Jaffer Brothers (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
121 Const. P. 7813/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Good Luck Industries (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
122 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
123 Const. P. 2076/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Abdul Hameed Pathan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.38-K/2018 Abdul Hameed Pathan v. Fedeation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
124 Const. P. 4507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nighat Munir (Petitioner) VS Madam Humera and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
125 Const. P. 6378/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
126 Const. P. 68/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sherbaz Khan Rind And ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.881-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Sherbaz Khan Rind and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
127 Const. P. 6611/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ismail & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.498/2019 Muhammad Ismail Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
128 Const. P. 114/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mst Dhayani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & 8 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
129 Cr.Bail 499/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2016 Qamaruddin S/o Haji Muhammad Suleman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
130 Cr.Bail 156/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Asghar Ali S/o Khambro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
131 Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
132 Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-19 Yes whether there is any violation of Statutory Law, compelling the Petitioner to invoke the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court? Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
133 Const. P. 5093/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asghar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
134 Const. P. 5470/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.443-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Muzaffae Jamil Mirza & others,C.P.376-K/2020 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.1839/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Muzaffar Jamil Mirza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
135 Const. P. 5496/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hassan Jan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
136 Const. P. 3687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
137 Const. P. 2681/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mazhar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
138 Const. P. 429/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Naushad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
139 Const. P. 280/2004 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Pervaiz (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
140 Const. P. 3508/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Riasat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
141 Const. P. 1524/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
142 Const. P. 2676/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Javed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
143 Const. P. 1768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Bilawal & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
144 Const. P. 2362/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Qurban Ali Khoso & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
145 Const. P. 2852/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Nawaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 No Contempt Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
146 Const. P. 370/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shahmeer (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
147 Const. P. 1237/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ismail Narejo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
148 Const. P. 2962/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sadique Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
149 Const. P. 643/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muazaffar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
150 Const. P. 1589/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ishaque & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
151 Const. P. 505/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Habibullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
152 Const. P. 87/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Fayyaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
153 Const. P. 738/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
154 Const. P. 131/1993 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1993 Muhammad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
155 Const. P. 300/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hyder Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
156 Const. P. 291/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
157 Const. P. 3221/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Akhlaq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
158 Const. P. 159/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Haji Mohammad Saleh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
159 Const. P. 2408/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Jalal Khan (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
160 Const. P. 3199/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Anees Raja (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
161 Const. P. 1840/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Zahida Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
162 Const. P. 2872/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
163 Const. P. 2879/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Noorul Amin Sipio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
164 Const. P. 3302/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Wajahat Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
165 Const. P. 3146/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Lala Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
166 2023 PLC CS Note 99 Const. P. 3218/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.739-K/2019 Zaheer Ahmed v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
167 Const. P. 3066/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
168 Const. P. 8579/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Abdul Basit and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.695-K/2019 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.24-K/2022 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
169 Const. P. 2933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dolat Khan (Petitioner) VS D.C. Tando Allahyar and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
170 Const. P. 3216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mir Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
171 Const. P. 1410/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sain Dino &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
172 Const. P. 3196/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
173 Civil Revision 247/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Abdul Rehman (Applicant) VS Shafi Muhammad and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
174 Const. P. 3306/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
175 Const. P. 3316/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
176 2021 PLC (CS) 109 Const. P. 4356/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mohammad Ismail (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-19 Yes the Respondent-Pakistan Steel Mills is/was competent to award minor penalty, if they find/found any employee to be guilty of the dereliction of duty, therefore, contention of the Petitioner that he was mistakenly demoted is not borne out of record. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.627-K/2019 Muhammad Ismail v. The Chairman Pakistan Steel, Bin Qasim, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
177 Const. P. 8267/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.693-K/2019 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.22-K/2022 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
178 2023 PLC Lab. Note 81 Const. P. 417/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zameer Hussain (Petitioner) VS Registrar & Campus Administrator & Security Advisor (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
179 Const. P. 492/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dildar Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
180 Const. P. 379/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
181 Const. P. 3742/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
182 Const. P. 2094/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mrs. Tanweer Baloch (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
183 Const. P. 1683/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Raju (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
184 Const. P. 990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Faqir Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
185 Const. P. 3280/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Asghar& others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
186 Const. P. 3300/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jamshed Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
187 Const. P. 7530/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shahana Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
188 Const. P. 8580/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Wasif and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.696-K/2019 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.25-K/2022 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
189 Const. P. 3800/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ayoob and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
190 Civil Revision 254/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Nabi Bux and Others (Applicant) VS Lutufullah and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
191 Const. P. 2423/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Syed Sadique Ali Masoomi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
192 Const. P. 3275/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
193 Const. P. 713/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Zafar Ali Shah. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4145/2019 Muhammad Hussain Ghumro & others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.P.4106/2019 Makhdoom Aqeeluz Zaman & another v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others,C.P.4433/2019 Shahzad Tahir Thaheem & others v. Syed Zafar Ali Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of
194 Const. P. 8578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Tariq and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.694-K/2019 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.23-K/2022 Muhammad Tariq v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
195 Const. P. 8581/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Trustees of Port of Karachi and ors (Petitioner) VS Adeel Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.697-K/2019 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.26-K/2022 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
196 Const. P. 857/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
197 Const. P. 3031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sajidullah (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.M.A.178-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon and others,C.P.1451-K/2020 Imdad Hussain v. Sajidullah Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
198 Const. P. 3020/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Manoj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
199 Const. P. 729/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Fakhur din (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
200 Const. P. 3696/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sheikh Nabi Bux Azad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
201 Const. P. 129/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sultan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
202 Const. P. 2708/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 MumtazAli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
203 Const. P. 3578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 KhudaBux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
204 Const. P. 3616/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Panhwer & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
205 Const. P. 2016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Pir Ali Dino Shah Jeelani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
206 Const. P. 2552/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulqarnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
207 Const. P. 2619/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
208 Const. P. 2999/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ramzan Solangi & others (Petitioner) VS Raza Muhammad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
209 Const. P. 1347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
210 Const. P. 158/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
211 2023 PLC CS Note 94 Const. P. 5859/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran Chandio (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Inquiry proceedings against employee of PDHA. Employee of PDHA cannot approach this court in Constitutional Jurisdiction, as they are regulated by the Pakistan Defence Housing Authority Service Rules 2008, which are non-statutory. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
212 Const. P. 7655/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Disciplinary proceedings against employee of PSO--We, thus, are of the view that it is for the Respondent-Company to place its employees in accordance with its Service Rules and Regulations, which is an internal matter of the Respondent-Company, thus devoid of any Constitutional interference, at this juncture. Our view is supported by the latest decision announced on 13.5.2019 by the Honorable Supreme Court in an unreported case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals (2019 SCMR 984)--we are not inclined to interfere in the terms and conditions of the service of the Petitioner, in Constitutional Jurisdiction, being non-statutory Rules of Service, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
213 Const. P. 1857/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
214 Const. P. 507/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohsin Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
215 Const. P. 1690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
216 Const. P. 2859/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Masood Aslam Jat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
217 Const. P. 3453/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Aachar& others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
218 Const. P. 10/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zafar Ali Khushk (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
219 Const. P. 2114/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
220 Const. P. 178/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
221 Const. P. 2057/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
222 Const. P. 791/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Qdir & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
223 Const. P. 1573/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
224 Const. P. 646/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Al-Kousar Drinking Water (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 Yes to direct the Karachi Water and Sewerage Board (KW&SB) to grant him license to continue his business for supplying Brackish water via Pipe Line from Subsoil/boring to National Refinery and other industries in Karachi--we are not inclined to subscribe to the request of the petitioner because no right of the petitioner to extract minerals/brackish water has been established and prima-facie under the garb of this petition he has attempted to continue such an activity illegally Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
225 Const. P. 486/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Jamilan Siyal & another (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
226 Const. P. 876/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shakir Ali (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-20 Yes Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.736/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Shakir Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
227 2022 PLC CS Note 26 Const. P. 2695/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Tarruf Ali (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-20 Yes Police Department--Petitioner has been reverted / demoted from the rank of Police Inspector to his substantive rank of Police Head Constable on account of earning out of turn promotion during his tenure of service---In view of the foregoing discussion, this petition is allowed whereby the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue retirement order of the petitioner to the rank of Police Inspector and is entitled to be paid his full pensionary benefits as admissible to Police Inspector under the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this judgment. Pending application stands disposed of accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.193-K/2020 Province of Sindh thr. I.G.Police and others v. Taaruf Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
228 Const. P. 550/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Amad Hussain Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
229 Cr.Bail 1423/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 BACHAL MALLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
230 Const. P. 405/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Dr. Nazia Iram & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
231 Const. P. 440/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mulla Idrees (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
232 Const. P. 3059/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Tanveer ali and others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of sindh and others. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
233 Const. P. 998/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 983,993,979/2020 2020 Jalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3636/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Jaleel Ahmed Lashari Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
234 Const. P. 455/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 HESCO (Petitioner) VS Qurban Ali & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
235 Const. P. 6387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Beenish Mobin & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1432-K/2020 Amjad Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
236 Const. P. 286/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Shahnaz & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
237 Const. P. 575/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1288-K/2020 Abdul Rehman Rajput v. The District Judge Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
238 Cr.Bail 2/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shafiq-ur-Rehman (Applicant) VS Directorate of Special Custom (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-21 No Special Criminal Bail Application Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
239 Cr.Acq.A. 17/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 The State (ANF) Hyd (Appellant) VS Mumtaz Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.154-K/2019 Mst: Fatima v. Rehmat Ali and another,Crl.P.162-K/2020 The State through Anti Narcotics Force v. Mumtaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
240 Const. P. 1060/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
241 Const. P. 855/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Waheed Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Nabi & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1278-K/2020 Waheed Ali & others v. Ghulam Nabi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
242 Const. P. 6431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Irshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-20 Yes Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. Respondents 4 and 5 are directed to submit before this Court on the next date hearing a list of all such employees of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh who were absorbed / appointed at any post and are still holding such post, and also the notification of repatriation of respondent No.7 to his parent department. Issue notice to all the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for compliance. To come up on 22.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when respondents 4 and 5 shall be in attendance. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.279-K/2020 Ghulam Ali v. Irshad Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
243 Const. P. 4932/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zakia Naz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes petitioner has impugned the Notice dated 04.09.2020 issued by the respondents for vacating the official accommodation i.e. Flat No. B-18, situated in Government Official Residence (GOR-II) Sindhi Muslim Co-operative Housing Society ---Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-4129 of 2020 and other connected petitions vide common Judgment dated 12.10.2020, therefore, the instant petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust her remedy, if any, as provided under the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1442-K/2020 Zakia Naz v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
244 Const. P. 2363/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.935/2020 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau Islamabad v. Nadeem Ahmed Siddiqui Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
245 Const. P. 4976/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Naseer Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-20 Yes Petitioner has called in question the rejection of his candidature for the post of District Public Prosecutor (BS-19) in Law Department, Government of Sindh vide letter dated 18.10.2019 issued by Sindh Public Service Commission Hyderabad (SPSC) on the analogy that he did not possess ten (10) years' experience as an Advocate of High Court ---In our view, the submission of respondents will be counterproductive and would prevent good Advocates from accepting appointments in civil service if this analogy persists. The second limb of the argument of the respondents is that once an Advocate is appointed as a Law Officer in any department of the Government of Sindh, he cannot be appointed to the post of District Public Prosecutor has to be ruled out for the understanding that it does not appeal to logic--We, therefore, hold that ten (10) years' service experience includes a period of serving as a law officer, which counts active practice at the bar which petitioner possesses and therefore is qualified to appear for the subject test for the position of District Public Prosecutor--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of SPSC is directed to allow the petitioner to appear in the subject interview and after conducting his interview announce the result accordingly within two (02) weeks from today. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
246 Const. P. 5907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.228/2021 Overseas Pakistanis Foundation thr. its authorized Office, Karachi v. National Industrial Relations Commission(Full Bench) , Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
247 Const. P. 1830/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amjad Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.87-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Amjad Hussain & others,C.P.750-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Amjad Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
248 Const. P. 4523/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
249 2022 PLC CS Note 24 Const. P. 8251/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Jamal Nasir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes STEVTA--promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA under Rule 7-A of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--a civil/government servant is entitled for proforma promotion, once during his service his promotion is approved by the Competent Authority and in the meanwhile if he superannuates, he is entitled for all benefits as admissible under the law--we deem it appropriate to send the matter of the petitioner for the promotion from Assistant Professor (BPS-18) to the post of Associate Professor (BPS-19) in STEVTA to the Competent Authority of Sindh Government for consideration in accordance with law. STEVTA Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
250 Const. P. 7155/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mujtaba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
251 Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-20 Yes Employees of KDA whose pension and other post-retirement benefits have been stopped or delayed by KDA--According to the report, public notice in terms of order dated 19.03.2020 was published in newspapers on 27.08.2020 ; a total amount of Rs.234,749,894.00 is payable by KDA to its retired employees ; and, an amount of Rs.23,741,450.00, being 10% amount of the pension and post-retirement benefits, has been paid by KDA to its 988 retired employees. Learned counsel for the petitioners have expressed some reservations with regard to the contents of the above compliance report and state that the orders of this Court have not been complied with by KDA in letter and spirit. The above named Director Finance & Accounts KDA is directed to produce before this Court on the next date of hearing the complete bank statement of the bank account opened by KDA for the above purpose in pursuance of the order dated 19.03.2020. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
252 Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-20 No The Director General and Member Finance are directed to publish a public notice on behalf of KDA in Urdu daily Jang and English daily Dawn within ten (10) days from today notifying the retired employees of KDA that their pension and other post-retirement benefits shall be settled by KDA by paying 10% thereof latest by 30.04.2020 and the remaining 90% latest by 31.10.2020. Director General and Member Finance are directed not to use / utilize / appropriate any of the amounts mentioned in the proposal submitted today, or any part thereof, for any other purpose. In order to ensure compliance of this direction, they shall open a new bank account and shall transfer / deposit therein all the amounts, received and/or to be received, as mentioned in the said proposal. They are further directed to submit compliance report to this Court along with proof of opening the said new bank account, the transfer / deposit of amounts therein, fate of the auction of unsold units in PHS to be held on 24 to 27 March 2020, fate of the auction of plots in different schemes / townships to be held on 07 to 09 April 2020, and proof of payment of 10% amount to all retired employees as at 30.04.2020. To come up on 05.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when the Director General KDA and Member Finance KDA shall be in attendance along with the compliance report in the above terms. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
253 Const. P. 1983/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Atta Muhammad Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
254 Cr.Bail 267/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Hamadullah Bhutto (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
255 Const. P. 6632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Fareed Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-20 Yes regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3640/2020 Abdul Haque Shaikh and others v. Province of Sindh thr. its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Sectt. Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
256 Civil Revision 28/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2008 Muhammad Naseer and others (Applicant) VS H.M.C. and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
257 Const. P. 5988/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Abdul Qayyum and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
258 Const. P. 804/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Siddique and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
259 Const. P. 4542/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners??? promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
260 Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes It is well-settled law that the period of adhoc appointment cannot be counted towards service, the seniority in grade is to be taken effect from the date of regular appointment to a post and it cannot be conferred retrospectively. Since the service of the petitioner was confirmed admittedly with effect from 22.11.2019 as such promotion cannot be claimed by him without the requisite length of service except from the date of regular appointment. This reduces to the dictum that an ad-hoc appointee would only be entitled to seniority from the date of his regularization and not from the date of initial appointment. The petitioner accordingly is neither entitled for retrospective seniority nor promotion. This view is cemented by the judgment delivered in the case of Province of Sindh and others vs. Ghulam Farid and others, 2014 SCMR 1189, and Secretary to Government of Punjab and others vs. Muhammad Khalid Usmani and others, 2016 SCMR 2125. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
261 Const. P. 5844/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Naeemullah Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-20 Yes Deceased quota latest Deceased quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
262 Const. P. 721/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Manan (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1279-K/2020 Abdul Mannan v. The District Judge, Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
263 Const. P. 5651/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shabnam Magsi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
264 Const. P. 1562/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
265 Const. P. 5853/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 National Engineering Servies Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-20 Yes reinstatement in service--we may observe that the learned Single Bench of NIRC vide order dated 08.10.2020 allowed the Grievance Application of respondent No.2 and passed ex-parte order, which issue is still subjudice before the learned Full Bench of NIRC, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioners. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct respondent No.5 to decide the case of the petitioners within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned order dated 08.10.2020 shall remain suspended. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
266 Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
267 Const. P. 5703/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amir Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
268 Const. P. 706/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
269 Const. P. 8308/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.T..E.T & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
270 Const. P. 1040/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Danish (Petitioner) VS Deputy General Hyderabad Development Authority & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
271 Const. P. 2115/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mansoor and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
272 Const. P. 6021/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Ahmed Maaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-20 No Petition was dismissed in the following terms and with the following direction to PMC : Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent No.3 as well as learned DAG have concluded their submissions. For the reasons to follow, the instant petition and listed application are dismissed, however, with the direction to respondent No.3 / PMC to ensure that all SOPs in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic prescribed by the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Ministry of Health Government of Pakistan, and the Ministry of Health of the Province concerned, are strictly followed in letter and spirit by the students, invigilators and all persons / staff present at the examination centres during the subject MDCAT examination. There will be no order as to costs. PMC is further directed to ensure that results of the subject tests held on 29.11.2020 and 13.12.2020 must be announced together and a single merit list is issued in respect of the tests held on both the above dates. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
273 Const. P. 994/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s. Guidance Schooling System Thr. M. Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Mst. Seema Mohsin and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JAN-21 Yes Rent matter-- In view of the above, no illegality is found to have been committed by both courts below. Writ of certiorari against the order passed in rent jurisdiction can be exercised only if the order is beyond the jurisdiction or patently illegal, which is not the present case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
274 Const. P. 933/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Progressive Educational Society Thr. Saima Khan (Petitioner) VS Kusum Education Society and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
275 Const. P. 1115/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Lt Col (R) Abdul Latif Dar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Ombudsman and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 No Petitioners have impugned decision dated 13.02.2020 by the learned Provincial Ombudsman Sindh, Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Work Place, whereby they have penalized under Section 4(4)(ii)(c&e) of the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Work Place Act, 2010--After making submissions at some length regarding maintainability of this petition in view of the above, learned counsel does not press this petition and states that the petitioners would be filing a representation / appeal before the worthy Governor of Sindh against the impugned decision. In view of his statement, the petition and listed applications are dismissed as not pressed leaving the petitioners at liberty to avail their remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
276 Const. P. 4529/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
277 Const. P. 6622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Javed Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Home Dept Sindh: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-20 Yes The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. The grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been rejected and they have been declared medically unfit on the basis of medical reports submitted by respondent No.5, wherein it was stated that they were suffering from Hepatitis B & C.--In view of the aforesaid position, the basic grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioners namely Abdul Sattar, Javed Iqbal and Sanullah, within a period of 02 (two) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. As far as petitioner No.3 Hafiz Muhammad Saleem is concerned, who was absent at the time of medical test, his medical test may be conducted in terms of order dated 26.02.2020, and if he clears the said test, he may be issued appointment order within two (02) weeks from the date of the result of his medical test. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.380-K/2020 The Province of Sindh & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others,C.A.1192/2020 The Province of Sindh thr. Secretary, Home Department & others v. Javed Iqbal Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Dismissed
278 Const. P. 5978/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mustafa Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
279 2022 SBLR Sindh 949 Const. P. 2647/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-20 Yes relieving him from the post of Director Anti-Quackery Sindh Health Care Commission (`SHCC`)--In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent- SHCC. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.104-K/2021 Dr.Muhammad Ayaz Mustafa v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
280 Const. P. 912/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes t is well-settled law that the advice of the Commission shall ordinarily be accepted by the department; and, if the advice of the Commission is not acceptable the case shall be submitted to the Government for orders as provided under Section 7 (1)(3) of Sindh Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules, 1990. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
281 Const. P. 521/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fauji Fertilizers Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Syed Jawad Ali Shah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.3151/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others v. M/s Sunny Floor Mill, through Attorney, Muhammad Hassan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
282 Const. P. 401/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zakir Hussain Larik (Petitioner) VS Provice of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
283 Const. P. 222/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Farhana (Petitioner) VS SSP Dadu and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
284 Const. P. 3168/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
285 Cr.Misc. 307/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Muhammad Hassan Narejo & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
286 Const. P. 585/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Inayatullah & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.1717-K/2021 Inayatullah & ohters v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
287 Const. P. 6075/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Merajuddin (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
288 Const. P. 704/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Rehman Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
289 Const. P. 7550/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS The Overseas Employment Corp & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.478-K/2021 Managing Director Overseas Employment Corporation & another v. Mir Abdul Majeed Dhillo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
290 Const. P. 2154/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
291 Const. P. 6200/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Mehdi Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-20 Yes Prima-facie his matter on the subject issue is still subjudice before the learned FST, which is presently not available at Karachi to adjudicate the matter of petitioner. This being the position of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct learned FST to decide the application under Rule 23-A of the Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules 1974 of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt of this order in accordance with the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
292 Const. P. 913/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Muhammad and another (Petitioner) VS Mukaram Khan and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-21 Yes Habeas Corpus--custody of minors--In view of the statement of the parties, the petitioners are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs. 200,000/- before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose and in the meanwhile petitioners shall not take away the custody of minors out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights in the intervening period subject to tentative payment of maintenance of the minors @ Rs.3000/- per month for each minor and maintenance at the rate of Rs.5000/- per month for petitioner-mother till final adjudication by the learned trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
293 Const. P. 2287/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
294 Const. P. 434/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ali Nawaz Umar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
295 Const. P. 650/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sikandar Ali Sial and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-FEB-21 No PSFL Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
296 Const. P. 2670/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
297 Const. P. 153/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Pervez Leghari (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naseema & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
298 Const. P. 1029/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1204/2023 Shah Nawaz (deceased) through his L.Rs and others v. Mst. Erum Saleem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
299 Const. P. 363/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Pir Muhammad Hassan Qadir (Petitioner) VS Muhammad S/O Amoon (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.890-K/2020 Muhammad Mallah v. Pir Muhammad Qadir & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
300 Const. P. 6052/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Musarrat Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Cabinet Division and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
301 Const. P. 4066/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zaheer Ahmed Hisbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
302 Const. P. 5423/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rizwan Ahmed Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 Yes This is the second contempt application arising out of order dated 24.05.2019 passed by this Court. This application is not maintainable on the ground that their earlier plea was discarded by this court in their earlier application, now they have again attempted to convince this Court by filling the second contempt application on the same grounds, which is not tenable under the law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. This is the second contempt application arising out of order dated 24.05.2019 passed by this Court. This application is not maintainable on the ground that their earlier plea was discarded by this court in their earlier application, now they have again attempted to convince this Court by filling the second contempt application on the same grounds, which is not tenable under the law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
303 Const. P. 533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khaleel Maseeh (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
304 2023 PLC CS Note 97 Const. P. 2293/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Noureen Naz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Primarily, the petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their services in Planning and Development Department, Government of Sindh-- It is an undisputed fact that the petitioners were project employees. Their letters of appointment clearly state that their posts were 'temporary project posts' which would be 'likely to continue till the completion of project and keeping in view the completion of project activities and finalization of scope of work relating to job assignment of the petitioners, the competent authority decided to closure of the project under policy decision, it is beyond the jurisdictional domain of this Court to delve into highly technical and purely policy issues which were better left to be dealt with by experts having relevant knowledge, training and expertise in their respective fields and the competent authorities authorized and empowered by law to do so--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petitions are hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.230-K/2020 Noureen Naz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
305 Const. P. 1439/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
306 Const. P. 620/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Prima facie, the subject matter of this petition is detection bill, which was issued by the Respondent-Company and the matter needs to be resolved by the Electric Inspector in accordance with sub-Section 6 of Section 26 of Electricity Act, 1910. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
307 Const. P. 174/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ameen Kharani (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1280-K/2020 Ameen Kharani v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
308 F.R.A 82/1985 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1985 Shahzaman (Appellant) VS Haji Ghulam Hyder & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
309 Cr.Misc. 131/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Waqar Hussain Kori (Applicant) VS The State & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
310 Const. P. 925/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ayaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
311 Const. P. 2634/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Islam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
312 Const. P. 426/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
313 Const. P. 2434/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khan Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
314 Const. P. 437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
315 Const. P. 3263/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No EOBI--Since the issue involved in these petitions is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-3026 of 2015 and other connected petitions vide common order dated 16.11.2020, therefore, these petitions being not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution are dismissed accordingly, leaving the petitioners to avail and exhaust their remedy, if any, as provided under the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
316 Cr.Misc. 255/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Fazul Hussain Shar (Applicant) VS The State & (09) Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
317 Suit 7/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nil (Plaintiff) VS Nil (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
318 2023 PLC CS Note 103 Const. P. 340/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M.Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-20 Yes We are of the view that the post cannot be upgraded / re-designated merely by passing the Resolution by defunct CDGK, the law has to take its own course and to be followed for the aforesaid purpose for which the petitioner has failed to justify his entitlement for proforma promotion with retrospective effect---It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others , PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. proforma promotion Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
319 2023 PLC Lab. Note 78 Const. P. 6863/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
320 Const. P. 4461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imtiaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-20 Yes Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceased???s first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Hon???ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. Petitioner is the second wife of deceased Saeeduddin Qureshi, who passed away on 22.12.2009, seeks twenty-eight (28) month family pension, granted to deceaseds first wife namely Mst. Bushra Saeed, who passed away on 25.11.2016--On the aforesaid proposition, we seek guidance from the order dated 21.02.2013 passed by Honble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.48 of 2013 (International Islamic University, Islamabad V/S Jahanzaib Khan and others), wherein it was held, inter alia, that all the Government departments, agencies and officers deployed to serve the general public within the limits prescribed by the Constitution and the law shall not cause unnecessary hurdle or delay in finalizing the payment of pensionary / retirement benefits, and any violation of such direction shall amount to criminal negligence and dereliction of the duty assigned to them--This petition stands allowed / disposed of with no order as to costs along with pending application(s) in the above terms. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 as well as to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, and the Accountant General, Sindh, for compliance. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
321 Const. P. 258/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
322 Const. P. 2805/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Shamim Qureshi (Petitioner) VS J.S.M.U and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
323 Const. P. 562/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Munawar & others (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
324 Const. P. 6319/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Naseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 Yes we are clear in our mind that the petitioner proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of actualization of up-gradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits. On the subject, we are guided by the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioner has been unable to make out a case for the actualization of upgradation of his post in BPS 17 and ancillary benefits with retrospective effect, based on the office order dated 31.8.2018. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1600-K/2021 Naseem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Ministry of Local Bodies & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
325 2022 PLC (CS) 1266 Const. P. 3854/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mst. Farah Naz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 Yes we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
326 Const. P. 385/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Zeeshan Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
327 Const. P. 2448/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Justice(R)Ibadatyar Khan(late)through Legal heirs (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
328 Const. P. 1955/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Naeem Shah (Petitioner) VS Clifton Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
329 Const. P. 57/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghulam Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
330 Const. P. 2028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Abid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.470-K/2021 Muhammad Abid v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
331 Const. P. 4635/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Raza Bhatti and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 Yes back benefits Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1262/2021 Javed Raza Bhatti and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
332 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 561/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
333 Const. P. 6628/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Mehboob Re-Rolling Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
334 Const. P. 3520/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zahid Hussain Shah Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Addl I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-JUN-21 Yes official accommodation Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
335 Const. P. 4484/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Johan Pvt Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
336 Const. P. 4485/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Prof. Javed Ahmed Badvi & another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 Yes Petitioner No.2 has impugned the recruitment process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the position of Vice-Chancellor, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University, Larkana, (SMBBMU)---We are of the view the ground of awarding marks to the shortlisted candidates by the Search Committee was not their mandate under reference set forth by the competent authority. On the subject, unreported order dated 21.12.2017 passed by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Civil Petition No.655-K of 2017 (Re-Prof. Abdul Razak Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others) and Professor Dr. Razia Sultana supra is clear in its terms Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
337 Const. P. 7127/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Ashiq Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.805-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & others v. Syed Ashiq Ali Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
338 Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
339 Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
340 Const. P. 4943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Lucky Landmark (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5959/2021 Aziz Tabba Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, through its Secretary, Labour and Human Resource Department, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
341 Const. P. 3736/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Noman Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
342 Const. P. 5412/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iftikhar Ahmed Lodhi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
343 Const. P. 3911/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khursheed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
344 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 564/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
345 Const. P. 6313/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asadullah Lashari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 Yes quo warranto --maintainability of this petition on the ground that private respondents were appointed in the year 2013 in Lyari Development Authority.alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in the year 2013 when the aforesaid appointments were made by the Lyari Development Authority and now he has approached this Court on 09.12.2020 after a delay of approximately 07 years from the date of the alleged cause of action. Thus his case falls within the ambit of the doctrine of laches. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
346 Const. P. 4816/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hubdar Ali Khaki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
347 Const. P. 657/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M. Masood Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
348 Const. P. 8002/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2936/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted
349 Const. P. 4848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Cresent Chemical Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
350 Const. P. 2082/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Zaman Textile Mils Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
351 Const. P. 5171/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Defence and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1534-K/2021 Shabbir Aslam v. The Secretary Defence Having office at Pakistan Secretariat Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
352 Const. P. 3869/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Ambreen (Petitioner) VS D.G Estate Management and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
353 Const. P. 494/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ms. Reshma Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No At this juncture, counsel for the petitioners has placed an application for maternity of Ms. Reshma Khan [petitioner in CP.NO.D-494 of 2017], which is past and closed transaction. We expect that university shall treat the professors with the due respect as well as the professors are expected that they will perform their duties with diligence within their code of conduct. Accordingly, petition No. D-3683 of 2016 stands disposed of in view of undertaking, made by learned counsel for respondents. With regard to promotions, if any, petitioners shall be heard by the respondents and in case any application/presentation is preferred that shall be decided within one month. CP.No.D-494 of 2017 is also disposed of in terms as mentioned above Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
354 Const. P. 4870/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tanveer Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No It is contended that CPEC program is in existence and continued. Safety of employees, foreign and/or local(s), is priority as CPEC is a sensitive project. Hence service of petitioners were taken on contract hence till further hearing they shall be considered as contract employees with same perks and privileges however competent authority shall examine each case in terms whether or not petitioners are eligible to continue their services on contract. Such exercise shall be completed within two months with report. Note: It is clarifi8ed that this order will not be considered to treat the petitioners as regular employees and matter will be heard on next date. Accordingly impugned notification is suspended in above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
355 Const. P. 1785/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
356 Const. P. 4516/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Sehrish Ishfaque & Ors (Petitioner) VS Proovince of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
357 Cr.Bail 322/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ashfaq Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
358 Const. P. 1718/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Aslam and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Education & Literacy Dept & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No we dispose of this petition with direction to the Secretary Education (Schools) that Grievance Redressal Committee shall examine the case of the petitioners after providing opportunity of hearing and in case they are qualified, having merits, they shall be accommodated/appointed in view of earlier advertisement made in 2018 and the policy Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
359 Const. P. 161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Karim Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
360 Cr.Bail 204/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Arz Muhammad Khosa (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 No Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
361 Cr.Bail 191/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Mujeeb Rehman @ Mujahid (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
362 Const. P. 6261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
363 Const. P. 1874/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ms. Shahid Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-21 Yes transfer and posting issue Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
364 Const. P. 4567/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Aqeel Pinger & Others (Petitioner) VS MCC (Appraisement) & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
365 Cr.Bail 316/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghazi Haleli Jatoi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
366 Const. P. 824/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abida Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
367 Const. P. 2167/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahnawaz Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
368 Const. P. 4658/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammads Junaid Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 No To appreciate as to whether the case of the petitioner falls within the ambit of Rule 11-A of 1974 or otherwise, let notice be issued to the respondents as well as to learned AAG for 27.05.2021with direction to file comments Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
369 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 570/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
370 Const. P. 6661/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shabana & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.968-K/2022 Mst.Shabana & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
371 Const. P. 3184/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-21 Yes In the light of the above discussion, in our view, a deputationist could not be treated as an aggrieved person, because she has no vested right to remain on a post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period and can be repatriated at any time to her parent department more particularly in the light of aforesaid decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court. Reference is also made to the case of Dr. Shafi-ur-Rehman Afridi V/s CDA, Islamabad through Chairman and others (2010 SCMR 378). Even otherwise she cannot continue to serve on deputation in Sindh Government after her removal from service by the parent department, as discussed supra. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
372 Const. P. 6676/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Attaullah Sirohi & Ors (Petitioner) VS G.M Human Resources SSGC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1379/2021,C.P.5122/2021,C.P.1071-K/2022,C.A.3984/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
373 Cr.Bail 127/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Sabir Ali Khoso (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes For the aforesaid reasons, the instant bail application merits no consideration is dismissed. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the case; dispose of the same preferably within two months from the date of this Order; and, it is made clear that the direction given by this Court in bail matters may not be taken lightly and valid reasons are to be assigned if the same direction is not complied with as now it is well-settled law that to have a speedy trial is the fundamental right of the accused being universally acknowledged. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, a smooth methodology and Scheme for a speedy trial are provided whether it is held by the Sessions Court or Magistrate, in recognition of the said right of an accused person. This principle shall apply more vigorously to the trials before Special Courts, constituted under the CNS Act, or any other special law so that unnecessary delay, a much less shocking one in its conclusion is avoided in all circumstances. Any unreasonable or shocking delay in the conclusion of the trial, before Special Courts, would amount to the denial of justice, or to say, denial of fundamental rights to the accused, of speedy trial. On the aforesaid proposition. In this context, I am fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Imtiaz Ahmed vs. The State (2017 SCMR 1194). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
374 2023 SBLR Sindh 1117 Const. P. 6192/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes quo warranto Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.562-K/2021 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
375 Const. P. 1412/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ameet Kumar (Petitioner) VS The Chief Secretary Government of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-21 Yes joining, seniority and qualification Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.438-K/2022 Tahir Hussain & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
376 Const. P. 1753/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syyed Jehangir Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
377 Const. P. 6110/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Murtaza and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5305/2021,C.P.1672-K/2021,C.A.351/2022,C.A.354/2022,C.A.350/2022,C.A.348/2022,C.P.6602/2021,C.P.6604/2021,C.A.356/2022,C.P.6599/2021,C.P.L.A.5223/2023,C.P.L.A.2919/2023 SCP Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
378 Civil Revision 153/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Amin (Applicant) VS Nazimul Haq (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
379 Cr.Misc. 445/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
380 Const. P. 2648/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Neno (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
381 Const. P. 760/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Anwar Pasha (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
382 Cr.Bail 840/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imdad Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.150-K/2021 Imdad Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
383 Cr.Misc. 717/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 MST.SHAHZADI (Applicant) VS MASHOOQ @ CHEEZ & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
384 Const. P. 1769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.282-K/2022 Dr.Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
385 R.A (Civil Revision) 135/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Zakir S/o Abdul Malik (Applicant) VS Muhammad Faisal and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes In principle, the applicant has lost his case; and, at the revision stage, he has agitated the grounds already exhausted by him and properly adjudicated by the competent forum including the plea that the suit filed by the respondent was time-barred on the premise that he made last payment to the applicant on 12.8.2015 whereas, he filed his suit No.497/2017 for declaration, specific performance of sale agreement, permanent injunction and consequential relief on 24.4.2017 means 01 year, 08 months and 12 days Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
386 Const. P. 722/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rabia Sultana (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
387 Const. P. 728/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Munir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
388 R.A (Civil Revision) 190/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: R.A 195/2006(Muhammad Ishaque V/S Photo and others) 2006 Misri (Applicant) VS Photo and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1704-K/2021 Misri v. Photo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
389 Const. P. 705/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zain Ul Abdin (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
390 Const. P. 1518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
391 Const. P. 2155/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
392 Cr.Bail 682/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Naqash and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
393 Cr.Bail 2435/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 KHAMISO S/O CHIBHAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
394 Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
395 Const. P. 1763/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
396 Civil Revision 122/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Haji Achar (Applicant) VS Qaisar Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
397 Cr.Bail 652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
398 Const. P. 1028/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
399 Const. P. 688/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
400 2022 MLD 1315 Cr.Bail 698/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD ALI SOOMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
401 Cr.Bail 895/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Saleem Khan Qaimkhani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.2-K/2022 Saleem Khan Qaimkhani v. Mst. Ghazala & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
402 Const. P. 743/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Khanzada Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
403 Const. P. 2708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nazir Ahmed and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
404 Const. P. 668/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Gul Mir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
405 First Appeal Against Order 66/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Umer Farooque (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shafique (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
406 Const. P. 1930/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
407 Const. P. 717/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Amad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
408 Const. P. 724/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
409 2022 MLD 1506 Const. P. 991/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Fatima Zehra D/o Zahid Abbas (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Sheroz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes The learned Civil & Family Judge shall fix any two days in a month for the meeting of father-respondent No.1 with the minor baby Dua, and in the meanwhile, petitioner-mother shall not take away the custody of minor out of the jurisdiction of the learned Guardian and Wards Court without intimation to the concerned Court. However, the respondent-father shall have visitation rights i.e. Birthdays, Eid occasions, and summer and winter vacations and arrangements shall be made by the learned Family Court upon filing appropriate application by the respondent-father and the learned Family Court would be at liberty to pass appropriate order on such application concerning the date, time and place of meeting of minor with respondent-father, however, that arrangement is subject to the observation made by this Court as discussed in the preceding paragraph and also subject to payment of maintenance of the minor, which has already been done by the learned Family Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
410 Const. P. 159/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-22 Yes whether the private respondents have the requisite length of service to claim promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (BS-18) in the PHED; and, whether the DPC considered the case of the petitioners along with private respondents for promotion under law and policy of the Government of Sindh as introduced in the year 1984 or otherwise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1709/2022 Fazal uddin Soomro and others v. Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi ad others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
411 Const. P. 1181/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ms. Allah Bachai Soomro (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
412 Civil Revision 15/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 The Islamic Republic Of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Rahim Bux & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
413 Cr.Bail 2170/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHID @ BURGER @ BOSS & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-21 Yes seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.427/2021 for offenses under Section 397/34 PPC registered at PS Gizri Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
414 Const. P. 693/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Faisal Kareem (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
415 Const. P. 709/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farhana Jan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
416 Const. P. 2508/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nil (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
417 R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 The Islamic Repubilec Of Pakistan (Applicant) VS Rahim Bux & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
418 Cr.Bail 683/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Bahadur (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
419 Const. P. 5681/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ziauddin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
420 Const. P. 3264/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mirza Moazam Zahoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
421 Const. P. 2651/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Nabi Khan Sanjirani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
422 Const. P. 2969/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khursheed Khalil Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1238-K/2023 Khursheed Khalil Khan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
423 Const. P. 6395/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Tauqeer (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
424 Const. P. 5666/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Farooq Legharii (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
425 Const. P. 255/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
426 Const. P. 296/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Taqseema (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
427 Const. P. 7330/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ahmed Tabba (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
428 Const. P. 3035/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
429 Const. P. 6779/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Salman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
430 Const. P. 814/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abid Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
431 Const. P. 7902/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
432 Const. P. 8567/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mahmood Zamir Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.544-K/2022 Mahmood Zamir Farooqui v. The Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
433 I. A 40/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Syed Zafar Ali & Another. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-22 No The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside with direction to the learned Banking Court to decide the Suit expeditiously. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
434 Const. P. 1314/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Khawaja Yasiruddin (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
435 Const. P. 6132/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Zubair & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.489-K/2022 Muhammad Yaqoob Sheikh v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Human Rights Department & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
436 Const. P. 1683/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Maqsood Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
437 Const. P. 1312/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-22 Yes back benefits Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1480/2022 The Chief Executive Officer, Pakistan Steel Mills,Karachi v. Waqar Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
438 M.A. 38/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Sahib & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
439 Const. P. 258/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Aijaz Ali Jamali and Others (Petitioner) VS The Chief Minister and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
440 Const. P. 1428/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Attaullah Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
441 Const. P. 5282/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Maqsood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Sect: College Education Dept: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
442 M.A. 46/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd (Appellant) VS The Court of District Judge, Khi East and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
443 Const. P. 7331/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ahmed Tabba (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
444 Const. P. 5120/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills (Petitioner) VS M/s Fakhra Jabeen and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
445 Const. P. 1263/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Waheed Memon (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.833/2022 Abdul Waheed Memon v. National Bank of Pakistan through its President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
446 Const. P. 5232/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Balochistan Tax Bar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
447 Const. P. 5450/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Dadex & Eternit Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
448 Const. P. 5450/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Dadex & Eternit Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-22 Yes NIRC jursidiction Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
449 Const. P. 5199/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sadullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
450 Const. P. 3825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Umer Textile and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
451 Const. P. 1867/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Subhan Ali Shoro & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
452 Const. P. 6187/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
453 Const. P. 1232/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ikhtiar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
454 Const. P. 3872/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
455 Const. P. 982/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Aijaz Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
456 Const. P. 797/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Khalid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
457 Const. P. 2121/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 K & N Poultry Farms (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
458 Const. P. 1072/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Prof: Dr. Aneela Atta ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
459 Const. P. 2120/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 U & I Garment(Units 1-3) & another (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
460 Const. P. 4967/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahsan Raza and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
461 Const. P. 4623/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 United Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.995/2022 M/s United Bank Limited Islamabad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Labour and Human Resources Development, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
462 Const. P. 6549/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Habibur Rehman Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.484-K/2022 The Director General Military Land & Cantonment & another v. Habib Rehman Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
463 Const. P. 5475/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yasir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
464 Const. P. 5475/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yasir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
465 Const. P. 2606/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/ Din Leather Pvt Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
466 Const. P. 5439/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Muhammad Afroz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
467 Const. P. 3849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khadija Kausar (Petitioner) VS Sect: Worker Welfare Board & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
468 Const. P. 172/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mst.Koonjan (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Muhammadpur Odho & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.312/2023 Mst. Dattul v. Province of Sindh, through Secretary Home Department, Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
469 Const. P. 320/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Qurart.ul ain & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
470 Const. P. 361/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Naseema & Another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
471 Const. P. 425/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Anam and another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
472 Const. P. 272/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
473 Criminal Appeal 85/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUMTAZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
474 Const. P. 111/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Afshan and another (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
475 Const. P. 558/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Bakhtawar & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
476 Const. P. 343/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Khamiso Khan Lashari (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
477 Const. P. 526/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Gulzaran (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
478 Cr.J.A 57/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Hassan @ Ali Hassan and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
479 Const. P. 531/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst.Areena & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
480 Const. P. 311/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Naveeda & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
481 Const. P. 432/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
482 Const. P. 479/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mir Muhammad Kumbhar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
483 Const. P. 458/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Santosh & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
484 Const. P. 721/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mehtab Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
485 Const. P. 335/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Saleem Qureshi & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
486 Const. P. 340/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Hussain Palijo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sidh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
487 Const. P. 438/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sejawal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
488 Criminal Appeal 20/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 MAJID ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
489 Const. P. 667/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Allauddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4267/2022 Allauddin v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
490 Const. P. 3366/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 DR.Khair Muhmmad and Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
491 Const. P. 488/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khairun-Nisa & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3820/2022 Muhammad Yaseen v. Mst. Khair un Nisa and others,C.P.3821/2022 Muhammad Jawaid Moten v. Mst. Khair un Nisa and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
492 Const. P. 752/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Jawaid Moten (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khair un Nisa & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
493 Criminal Miscelleneous 386/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ghulam Qadir Malana (Applicant) VS The State & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
494 Cr.Tran 47/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Gul Muhammad Buriro (Appellant) VS The State and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
495 Const. P. 4322/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Niaz Ahmed Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
496 Cr.Bail 256/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sain Bux Kolachi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
497 Const. P. 672/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Qamaruddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4271/2022 Qamaruddin through his attorney Kamran Ali v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
498 Const. P. 1786/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Nasir and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.263-K/2023 The Chief Executive Officer Pakistan Steel Mills & another v. Muhammad Nasir & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
499 Const. P. 3559/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Tariq and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
500 Const. P. 8013/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Salman Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
501 Const. P. 115/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Naila and another (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
502 Const. P. 303/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
503 II.A. 32/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Sachal thr LRs (Appellant) VS P.o Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 16-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
504 Const. P. 4199/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Gul Zareen Muniri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
505 Const. P. 694/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Farooq Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
506 Const. P. 8446/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Gul Faraz (Petitioner) VS Member S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
507 Const. P. 7080/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
508 Const. P. 2606/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Saiqa Imdad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.733-K/2023 Saiqa Imdad v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
509 Const. P. 1/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Iqra & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
510 R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 malook shah (Applicant) VS buxan & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
511 Const. P. 751/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Sehrish & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
512 Const. P. 791/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Ramzan & Others (Petitioner) VS Karamullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.23-K/2023 Muhammad Ramzan & others v. Karamullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
513 Criminal Miscelleneous 837/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 IQBAL AHMED TUNIO & OTHERS (Applicant) VS HUSSAIN IQBAL HUSSAIN KHAN & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
514 Const. P. 2206/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Iqbal Hussain Baloch & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
515 Const. P. 309/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
516 R.A (Civil Revision) 152/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nawab (Applicant) VS Chaudhary Hafeez Allah and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
517 Const. P. 315/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Kainat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
518 Const. P. 1494/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ashiq Ali Narejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
519 Const. P. 3355/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Nadeem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.523-K/2023 The Federation of Pakistan through Home Secretary Govt. of Pakistan Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Nadeem Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
520 Const. P. 3531/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Faisal Manzoor Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
521 Const. P. 137/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khalid Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
522 Const. P. 2722/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Majid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
523 Const. P. 2200/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hussain Bux Ujjan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.323-K/2023 Ali Asghar Brohi v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Karachi & others,C.P.322-K/2023 Hussain Bux Ujjan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others,C.P.324-K/2023 Zameer Hussain Ujjan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending ,Pending
524 Cr.Rev 1/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Murad @ Mann (Applicant) VS Manzoor Ahmed & Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
525 Cr.Bail 247/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Arbab Ali Leghari and Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JUL-22 No Post arrest bail And Applications Under Section 426 Cr.P.C Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
526 Const. P. 564/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Shareef (Petitioner) VS Salauddin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1465-K/2022 Muhammad Shareef v. Sallahuddin & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
527 Const. P. 497/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Kabal Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
528 Const. P. 686/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shabbir (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
529 Const. P. 358/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Commissioner Workas Man Hyd (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
530 Const. P. 448/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sh. Reena Devi (Petitioner) VS Chhagan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.2988/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ghulam Mustafa and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
531 Const. P. 452/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Zahid Khan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Saiqa (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
532 Const. P. 187/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Asghar Arain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
533 Const. P. 706/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
534 Const. P. 3239/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mehnaz Begum and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
535 Const. P. 1835/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
536 R.A (Civil Revision) 284/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 WAPDA & Other (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ashraf (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
537 Criminal Appeal 107/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
538 Const. P. 468/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
539 Const. P. 412/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mat. Rashida & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
540 Const. P. 802/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Farman Ali (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
541 Const. P. 691/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Miraz Nadeem Baig (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
542 Const. P. 334/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Abdul Latif Mooro and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2420/2023 Abdul Sattar Siyal and others v. Province of Sindh, through its Secretary Agricutlure Department, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
543 R.A (Civil Revision) 38/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Wali Muhammad (Applicant) VS Secretary Health Depatt:and other (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.114/2023 Wali Mohammad v. The Secretary, Health Department Govt of Sindh through Deputy Commissioner, Nawabshah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
544 Const. P. 556/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Sehar & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
545 Const. P. 532/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mirtul Haq Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
546 Const. P. 692/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shahbuddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4274/2022 Shahabuddin deceased through his L.Rs v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
547 Cr.Bail 346/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Rahim (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
548 Const. P. 1354/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Nadeem Alam (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
549 Const. P. 134/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Shakeela & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
550 Const. P. 1785/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Majid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
551 Const. P. 730/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS M.D Korangi Fisheries Harbour & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1192/2023 Managing Director, Korangi Fisheries Harbour Authority, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
552 Const. P. 595/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Khalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.905-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Home Department Government of Sindh & others v. Khalil Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
553 Const. P. 485/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Leelan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.80-K/2023 Amin Lakhani & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Division Ministry of Finance Government of Pakistan Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
554 2022 SBLR Sindh 2207 Const. P. 687/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Liaquat Ali Kamangar (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
555 Const. P. 720/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Ghani Mashori (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
556 Const. P. 85/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Wahid (Petitioner) VS DIG Hyderabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
557 Const. P. 5636/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS DMC West Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
558 Const. P. 718/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Nazeer Ahmed Mirbahar (Petitioner) VS Akhtar Hussain & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
559 Const. P. 661/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ghulam, Muhammad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
560 Const. P. 4784/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ahmed Junaid Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
561 Const. P. 5967/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ayub Alvi (Petitioner) VS Admin Incharge Pakistan Cotton and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
562 Const. P. 5663/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mir Karam Ali Magsi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes whether a person is legally qualified for appointment or promotion to a particular post and grade is relatable to the factum whether he possesses the requisite qualifications for consideration, whereas the question of fitness pertains to the competency of the person concerned, which is to be decided by the competent authority. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
563 Const. P. 5469/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nida Hayat (Petitioner) VS Trustees of the Karachi Port and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
564 Const. P. 636/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer of Union Council Jacobabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
565 Const. P. 7072/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mazhar Ali and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.529-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Mazhar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
566 Const. P. 501/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Samina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
567 II.A. 19/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Amin Hasham & Others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Nadeem & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
568 Cr.Bail 2268/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 NAWAB ALI S/O ABBASS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
569 Const. P. 484/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Kainat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
570 Const. P. 6118/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3162/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
571 Const. P. 6122/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3166/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
572 Const. P. 7366/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Ghaffar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
573 Const. P. 6120/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3164/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
574 Const. P. 515/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Omar Jibran Engineering (Petitioner) VS The NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
575 Const. P. 4106/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Inam and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
576 Const. P. 1656/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Arif (Applicant) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Contemnor) D.B. Order 26-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
577 Civil Tran 8/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Awais Ali. (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ilyas & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
578 Const. P. 762/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Armughanullah & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAY-23 Yes Courts cannot grant equivalence of degree qualification for a particular advertisement. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
579 Cr.Bail 113/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 ABDUL HAFEEZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
580 Criminal Miscelleneous 225/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 ABDUL GHAFOOR (Applicant) VS SP COMPLAINT CELL HYD & OTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
581 R.A (Civil Revision) 108/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Dr Allah Bux Th His LRs (Applicant) VS Ghulam Mustafa and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
582 Const. P. 3022/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Eric Ghori & another (Petitioner) VS Learned Consumer Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
583 Const. P. 613/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
584 Cr.Bail 1219/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL GHANI S/OMEER KHAN CHANG (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
585 Criminal Miscelleneous 524/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 JAMAL S//O MUHAMMAD RAHIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
586 Cr.Bail 790/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Raju Mal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
587 Const. P. 1109/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Zohra and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
588 Cr.Bail 2573/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RANA YASEEN S/O RANA ASHFAQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
589 Cr.Bail 1494/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ALI S/O JAN MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
590 Election Appeal 120/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Aftab Hussain Qureshi S/o Muhammad Muneer Qureshi (Appellant) VS RO PS-45 Mirpurkhas-I and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
591 Cr.Bail 1123/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HAIDER ALI S/O SHER ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
592 Cr.Bail 960/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JALIL S/O MUHAMMAD ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
593 Criminal Miscelleneous 225/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED MUHAMMAD ADNAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
594 Cr.Bail 1676/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SAJJAN JE S/O BHANORO JEE (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
595 Cr.Bail 1595/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 KHADIM MAGSI S/O KHUDA BUX & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
596 Const. P. 6034/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Kamran Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
597 Const. P. 1601/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Shareef (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
598 Cr.Bail 1622/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
599 Cr.Bail 1532/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAN SALEEM SALEEM MUSTAFA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.136-K/2023 Syeda Sheir Bano & others v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
600 Cr.Bail 1395/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 KHURRAM AHMED PIRZADA S/O MUKHTIAR AHMED PIRZADA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
601 Cr.Bail 1443/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 WAQAS S/O NISAR AHMED Q (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
602 Cr.Bail 651/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 WALI SHAH S/O GUL SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
603 Cr.Bail 823/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ALI MURTAZA S/O NAZAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
604 Cr.Rev 139/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD AKHTAR S/O BASHIR AHMED (Applicant) VS VTH ADJ KHI CENTRAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3744/2023 Agha Abid Majeed Khan v. Idrees Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
605 Const. P. 5670/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Salman Corporation (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
606 Criminal Miscelleneous 568/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYEDA MADIHA ABBASS ZAIDI (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
607 Const. P. 845/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Hanif and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
608 Const. P. 225/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.213-K/2024 Liaquat Ali v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Education and Literacy Dept. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
609 Cr.Bail 908/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASADULLAH MUGHAL & 02 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
610 Cr.Bail 1553/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 TARIQ S/O SAKHI JAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
611 Cr.Bail 1696/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD RAFIQ S/O NAIK MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
612 Cr.Bail 1007/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mehrab & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
613 Criminal Miscelleneous 777/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAKIR KHAN S/O PAIND KHAN & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS VTH ADJ / EX OFFICIO JOP MALIR & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
614 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 157/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyd. (Applicant) VS M/s. Ramzan Steel Traders, Multan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.199-K/2024 Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) v. M/s Ramzan Steel Traders and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
615 Cr.Bail 1739/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 PEER MUHAMMAD S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
616 Cr.Bail 1740/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AFAQ GUL S/O MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
617 Cr.Bail 2590/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HAMZA KHAN S/O MURAD KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
618 Criminal Miscelleneous 709/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AASHIQUE ALI QURESHI S/O GHULAM MUSTAFA (Applicant) VS IIND ADJ THATTA & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
619 Criminal Miscelleneous 803/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHEIKH MUHAMMAD IMRAN AHMED (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL KEEMARI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
620 Election Appeal 73/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Arif S/o Abdul Majeed (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
621 Election Appeal 110/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Noor Muhammad Nizamani and Another (Appellant) VS RO PS-58 Tando Allahyar-I and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
622 Election Appeal 62/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Anita W/o Shankar (Appellant) VS RO PS-108 Khi South-II and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
623 Election Appeal 217/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ghulam Muhammad Banglani S/o Ali Murad Khan (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
624 Const. P. 1140/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shahban Ali S/o Muhammad Sachal Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
625 Election Appeal 118/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Sher Khan S/o Zareem Khan (Appellant) VS The Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
626 Cr.Bail 1532/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SYED SHEIR BANO & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STASTE (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
627 Cr.Acq.A. 548/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED ZAFFAR HUSSAIN S/O SYED ABDUL QADIR (Appellant) VS SALMAN HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD HASIN KHAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
628 Cr.Acq.A. 388/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED JAWAD RAZA S/O SYED QAMAR HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS ZEESHAN SO ABDUL RAOOF & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
629 Election Appeal 253/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Anwar Ali S/o Mir Hazar Khan (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
630 Const. P. 378/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sher Ahmed Mubejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
631 Const. P. 5025/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khan Zadi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-24 No Digital records under Rule 22.79 of Police Rules, 1934 ensure accountability and help trace missing persons and unidentified bodies. Compliance measures aim to modernize investigation and facilitate recovery efficiently. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
632 Const. P. 852/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shoukat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
633 Const. P. 780/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali Nawaz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
634 Const. P. 732/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Javed Hussain Leghari & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
635 Cr.Bail 119/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Saifullah & another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
636 Const. P. 348/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Nasir Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
637 Const. P. 352/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Imam Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
638 Const. P. 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes The learned counsel(s) for the private respondents and learned A.P.G with one voice state that neither they caused harassment to the petitioner nor they intend to do so in the future. Learned A.P.G further states that protection will be provided to the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with the direction that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and police shall be neutral in private affairs; however, if any cognizable offense is committed police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
639 Const. P. 5736/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s Meezan Tea Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-24 Yes The Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Sarwar Zardari vs. Piyar Ali alias Piyaro and another (2010 SCMR 624) has laid down that the High Court can intervene under Article 199 of the Constitution to correct mala fide or beyond-jurisdiction investigations by authorities. As such this Court can quash an FIR but not necessarily an investigation at its preliminary stage. Let the investigation be carried out and the result whereof shall be submitted to the competent court for appropriate orders within one month. 8. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, no case for interference in the investigation, under article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is made at this stage. This petition is dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
640 Const. P. 1257/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Hakim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
641 Const. P. 12/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Kainat (Petitioner) VS Suhail Asghar & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
642 Const. P. 1716/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sahib Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
643 Criminal Miscelleneous 523/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. NIyamat (Applicant) VS SSP Thrparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes In view of the above, alleged detainee Mst. Hawa cannot be claimed in illegal detention, as portrayed by the applicant; however, if the grievance of applicant still subsists, he is at liberty to appear in C.P.No.S-437 of 2024 to assist the court, if the lis is pending. 5. The very purpose of filling this application under section 491 Cr. P.C. has been served as the alleged detainee is no more in illegal detention in terms of the order dated 17-04-2024 passed by this Court; therefore, the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application stands disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
644 Criminal Miscelleneous 532/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Sadia (Applicant) VS IG Police Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-OCT-24 Yes alleged detainee Mst. Noshaba has been produced by her mother Mst. Farzana. On query, she states that she has been detained without her wish and will and torture has been inflicted upon her and now she wants to live with applicant Mst. Sadia, who is present before this Court. She also seeks protection. Since alleged detainee Mst. Noshaba is a sui juris lady, hence she is at liberty to go wherever she wants. However, the allegations of Mst. Noshaba shall be looked into by the SHO concerned and due protection shall be provided to her to the effect that no harassment shall be caused to the applicant as well to Mst. Noshaba. 3. The private respondents are warned to be careful while dealing with Mst. Noshaba and if any sort of harassment is caused to her and the applicant, they shall be dealt with under the law. 4. In view of the above, the instant application is disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
645 Const. P. 541/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali Hassan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
646 Const. P. 751/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. Ps. No. D-782, 792, 798, 865, 961, 1029, 1042, 1043, 1074, 1079, 1080, 1086 & 1087/2024 2024 Wahdat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
647 Criminal Miscelleneous 478/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Nasreen (Applicant) VS SSP Mirpurkhas & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
648 Const. P. 3439/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Laiba and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-24 No The police are responsible for protecting citizens and responding to their complaints. However, they often delay or avoid registering FIRs, especially in cases against influential individuals. To address this issue, the Supreme Court has outlined a mechanism for FIR registration, as detailed in the Haider Ali case reported in 2015 SCMR 1724. This mechanism aims to ensure prompt and impartial FIR registration. 10. Primarily, Courts play a crucial role in dispensing justice. When an FIR is lodged, the police are responsible for investigating the crime. However, often due to poor investigation, real culprits are acquitted along with innocent individuals. This failure of the police contributes to the persistence of crime in society at large. The principles outlined in the Muhammad Bashir case reported in PLD 2007 SC 539, should be strictly followed. No one should be arrested without sufficient/concrete evidence. Unjust arrests can lead to compensation claims against the responsible police officers. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
649 Const. P. 5967/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s S.M & A. Associates & Ors (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
650 Cr.Bail 2017/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SYED ZIA HUSSAIN SHAH S/O SYED MEHRBAN SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-24 Yes About the statement of co-accused and subsequent arrest of the applicant leading to the recovery of incriminating material in terms of seizer memo as discussed supra, no doubt, as per Article 43 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 when more persons than one are being jointly tried for the same offense and a confession made by one of such persons admitting that the offense was committed by them jointly, is proved, the court may take into consideration the confessional statement of that co-accused as circumstantial evidence against the other co-accused (s). However, the statement of one accused can be relied upon if there is some other independent evidence corroborating such a confessional statement. The principle ingrained in Article 43 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat is also applied at the bail stage and the confessional statement of an accused can lead the court to form a tentative view about prima facie involvement of his co-accused in the commission of the alleged offence. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Sarfraz Ansari vs. The State and others (PLD 2021 SC 738 ). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
651 Const. P. 748/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Allah Bachayo Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
652 Criminal Miscelleneous 639/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 KARIM BUX JOKHIO @ JAVED & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-24 Yes We have noticed that the Judicial Magistrate has been conferred with wide powers to take cognizance of an offense not only when he receives information about the commission of offense from a third person but also when he has knowledge or even suspicion that the offense has been committed. The Magistrate has the power to independently review a police report, even if it concludes that no offense was committed. They can disagree with the police's opinion and take cognizance of the offense, ordering further investigation or issuing process to the accused. The Magistrate's decision is based on their assessment of the facts, not solely on the police's opinion. The terms "charge sheet" and "final report" are not formally defined in the Code. However, they are commonly used in police rules to refer to reports filed under Section 170 Cr.P.C. Reports filed under Section 169, where there's insufficient evidence, are often termed "referred charge," "final report," or "summary." 16. In view of the above we, therefore, dispose of these Criminal Miscellaneous Applications along with the pending application(s), with direction to the trial court to proceed with the matter, frame the charge, and culminate the Criminal proceedings in its logical conclusion within a reasonable time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
653 Const. P. 1902/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Waqar Ahmed Jagirani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
654 Const. P. 1214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Ashique Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
655 Const. P. 462/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sahib Dino Tanwari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
656 Const. P. 1379/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Afaq Ahmed Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
657 Const. P. 272/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Haseena (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
658 Const. P. 629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Javed Ali Balouch (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-24 Yes 7. For the reasons given in the aforesaid judgments, in my view, there can hardly be any doubt that Respondent-Company is also a ???person??? within the meaning of Article 199(1) (a) (ii) read with clause (5) thereof. The learned five Member Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Pakistan Defence Officers' Housing Authority and others v. Lt. Col. Syed Jawaid Ahmed and other connected appeals supra has answered the question about the maintainability of the petition against the government-owned and controlled companies. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
659 Const. P. 3592/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Shaista Shahid & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
660 Const. P. 384/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Fayaz Ali Banbhan & Others (Petitioner) VS Director Food Department & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
661 Criminal Miscelleneous 66/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Nauman Tarique (Appellant) VS The State & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
662 Const. P. 533/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Niaz Husain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
663 Const. P. 1609/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Sarfraz Ali Jalbani & another (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
664 Const. P. 424/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Sattar & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
665 Const. P. 36/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Abdul Razaque Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
666 Const. P. 517/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Lal Dino Jakhro & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
667 Const. P. 357/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mst Seema (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
668 Const. P. 1826/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Shoaib Ahmed Mangi (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
669 Criminal Miscelleneous 987/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 DR. FATEH ALI S/O YAMEEN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JUL-24 Yes Minute examination of a case and conducting a fact-finding exercise are not included in the functions of a Justice of Peace but he is saddled with a sense of duty to redress the grievance of the complainant who is aggrieved by the refusal of a Police Officer to register his report. The offenses have been categorized by the Cr.P.C. into two classes i.e., cognizable and non-cognizable. Section 154 of the Cr.P.C. lays down a procedure for conveying information to an S.H.O. to the commission of a cognizable offense, while the provisions of Section 155 (1) of the Cr.P.C. articulates the procedure vis-??-vis a non-cognizable offense. 5. At whatever time, an Officer in charge of a Police Station receives some information about the commission of an offense, he is expected first to find out whether the offense disclosed fell into the category of cognizable offenses or non-cognizable offenses. There is no provision in any law, including Section 154 or 155 of the Cr.P.C., which authorizes an Officer Incharge of a Police Station to hold any inquiry to assess the correctness or falsity of the information before complying with the command of the said provisions. He is obligated to reduce the same into writing, notwithstanding the fact whether such information is true or otherwise. 6. The condition precedent for recording an FIR is that it should convey the information of an offense and that too a cognizable one. The remedy of filing a direct complaint cannot measure or match up to the mechanism provided under section 154, Cr.P.C., in which the Officer Incharge of a Police Station is duty-bound to record the statement and register the FIR if a cognizable offence is made out. If in every case it is presumed or assumed that instead of insisting or emphasizing the lodgment of an FIR, the party may file a direct complaint, then the purpose of recording an FIR, as envisaged under section 154, Cr.P.C., will become redundant and futile and it would be very easy for the police to refuse the registration of an FIR with the advice to file a direct complaint. However, in some exceptional circumstances, the alternate remedy in the shape of a direct complaint may be availed but not in every case. 7. The statutory duty casts upon the officer of a police station to enter information regarding the cognizable offense first and then the investigation comes later to gather evidence and other relevant material to prosecute the identified culprits. No doubt, an Investigating Officer plays a crucial role in the administration of the criminal justice system and the constituent of the investigation report and its worth keeps hold of plenteous value and repercussions on the outcome of any criminal case, but tainted investigations can become an acute obstacle in the administration of justice. In the case of Sughra Bibi vs. State [PLD 2018 SC 595], it was held that during the investigation, the Investigating Officer is obliged to investigate the matter from all possible angles while keeping in view all the versions of the incident brought to his notice and as required by Rule 25.2(3) of the Police Rules, 1934. An Investigating Officer has to find out the truth of the matter under investigation. His object shall be to discover the facts of the case and to arrest the real offender or offenders. He shall not commit himself prematurely to any view of the facts for or against any person. Whereas in the case of Babubhai v. State of Gujrat and others [(2010) 12 SCC 254], the Supreme Court of India held that investigation must be fair, transparent, and judicious as it is the minimum requirement of the rule of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
670 Cr.Bail 180/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Saleem Bheeri & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
671 Cr.Bail 942/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 ISMAIL S/O MOMIN KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-24 Yes On the point of the defense version, as pleaded by the accused, is concerned, he submitted that this Court is not to make a probe into the defense version to advance a plea of bail, rather it has to assess tentatively the material produced before it and to see if reasonable ground exists to believe, prima facie involvement of accused in the commission of the offense and if the accused found connected with the commission of the offense, he will not be released on bail based on further inquiry. Per learned counsel, the applicants/Accused has failed to demonstrate mala fide or ulterior motive on the part of the complainant or police to falsely implicate him in this case. He next argued that so far as the plea of the applicant/accused Ismail that his extra-judicial confession was recorded in police custody, thus not admissible under Articles 38 & 39 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, is concerned, the legal position in such a case is that if any incriminatory material related to the case is recovered or any fact is discovered in consequence of the information conveyed by the accused person, then the information so received would be admissible in evidence within the purview of Article 40 of the Qanun-e- Shahadat Order, 1984 because then the presumption would be towards its truthfulness. Since the disclosure of the accused Ismail has been followed by the recovery of some stolen property as well as the discovery of new facts of selling the gold ornaments including the present applicant/accused Habibullah, which earlier was not known. He argued that Article 40, of Qanoon-e-Shahadat, provides that when any fact is revealed in consequence of information received from any accused in the custody of a police officer, such information whether it amounts to a confession or not as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. The information supplied by the applicant Ismail under Article 40 ibid relating to incriminating articles is admissible. In support of his contention, he relied upon the case of Muhammad Akbar v The State 1995 SCMR 693, Murad Khan v Fazl-e-Subhan PLD 1983 SC 82, and copy of the charge-sheet, statements of ASI Shahbaz Ali and PC Humayoon Baig recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
672 Const. P. 819/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
673 Const. P. 585/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Muhammad Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
674 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 187/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AZEEM S/O BILAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-24 No Quantum of punishment is not only discretion of the Court, which has to be exercised while considering the circumstances of the case, but also is an independent aspect of Criminal Administration of Justice which, too, requires to be done keeping the concept of punishment in view. Conceptually, punishment to an accused is awarded on the concept of retribution, deterrence or reformation so as to bring peace which could only be achieved either by keeping evils away (criminals inside jail) or strengthening the society by reforming the guilty. There are certain offences, the punishment whereof is with phrase ???not less than??? while there are other which are with phrase ???may extend up to???. Thus, it is quite obvious and clear that the law itself has categorized the offences in two categories regarding quantum of punishment. For one category the Courts are empowered to award any sentence while in other category the discretion has been limited by use of the phrase ???not less than???. Such difference itself is indicative that the Courts have to appreciate certain circumstances before setting quantum of punishment in first category which appear to be dealing with those offences, the guilty whereof may be given an opportunity of ???reformation??? by awarding less punishment which how low-so-ever, may be, will be legal. The concept of reformation should be given much weight because conviction normally does not punish the guilty only but whole of his family/dependents too. A reformed person will not only be a better brick for society but may also be helpful for future by properly raising his dependents. Sentence reduced to seven years, with fine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
675 Const. P. 528/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Jabbar & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
676 Const. P. 947/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Muhammad Punah Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
677 Const. P. 1037/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Abdul Razzaque Hakro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
678 Const. P. 755/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shakeel Ahmed Chijjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
679 Const. P. 401/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mujeeb Rehman Ansari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
680 Const. P. 1273/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Syed Ayaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
681 Cr.Bail 172/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Yousif (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
682 Const. P. 389/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Dr Imamuddin & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
683 Const. P. 848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Asadullah Shar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
684 Const. P. 1361/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Muhammad Rahib Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
685 Const. P. 38/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mohammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
686 Const. P. 1678/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sajida Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
687 Criminal Miscelleneous 513/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sabhago (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes So far as the question raised by the learned counsel for the application that under The Sindh Child Marriage Restraint Act 2014, the purported marriage of Ms. Asha with Naseer Ahmed is illegal on the plea that she has not attained the age of 18 years, suffice it to say that the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939 recognizes such age as sixteen years (which earlier was 15 years but was substituted as sixteen years by the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (VIII of 1961), which finds a place as Section 13 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 and reads as under:- (13. Amendment of the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939).In the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939) in section 2:- 1. After clause (ii) the following new clause (ii-a) shall be inserted, namely:- ???(ii-a) that the husband has taken any additional wife??? (b) In clause (vii), for the word ???fifteen??? the word ???sixteen??? shall be substituted) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
688 Const. P. 6120/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Saresh Kumar Manglani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-24 Yes Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
689 Const. P. 2178/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mst.Naziran Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
690 Const. P. 661/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shahid Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
691 Criminal Miscelleneous 502/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Paru (Applicant) VS Sagram & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes After perusing the material available on record, it appears that the offense was allegedly committed on 25.7.2024 and reported on 6.8.2024 delay of twelve (12) days, hence the deliberation and consultation for implicating the accused cannot be ruled out. It further appears that injuries except for one falling u/s 337-F(vi) PPC (Ghair Jaifah Daimah), are bailable under the schedule of offenses while Section 337- F(vi) PPC, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr. P.C. is punishable with imprisonment for 07 years. So far the application of Section 506(ii), PPC is concerned, it is yet to be seen at trial after recording pro and contra evidence of the parties by the trial Court if the same attract at all in the facts of the case. There is no complaint of misusing the concession of pre-arrest bail granted to the respondents by the trial Court. 7. There is no denial to the fact that the Supreme Court since long has issued guidelines wherein the details of the considerations for the grant of bail and cancellation whereof are highlighted. This Court while handing down a judgment reported as Shahid Arshad Vs. Muhammad Naqi Butt (1976 SCMR 360) although found that the bail-granting order passed by the High Court is not sustainable in the eyes of the law and yet restrained to interfere in such order on the ground that there was nothing to show that the accused had misused the concession of bail. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
692 Cr.Bail 183/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Kalsoom & another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No that the second part of Section 497(1) CrPC provides that an accused shall not be released on bail if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that he/she has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. This part of Section 497(1) CrPC which prohibits the grant of bail in certain offences is popularly known as the prohibitory clause of Section 497(1) CrPC. It is further held that the first proviso to Section 497(1) CrPC provides that the Court may direct that any person under the age of sixteen years or any woman or any sick or infirm person accused of such an offense be released on bail. The Supreme Court further dilated upon the subject issue with the observation that the expression ???such an offense??? used in this proviso refers to the offense mentioned in the second part (prohibitory clause) of Section 497(1) CrPC, as for all other non-bailable offenses the Court is already empowered to release the accused on bail under the first part of Section 497(1) CrPC. The first proviso has thus made equal the power of the Court to grant bail in the offenses of prohibitory clause alleged against an accused under the age of sixteen years, a woman accused, and a sick or infirm accused, to its power under the first part of Section 497(1) CrPC. This means that in cases of women, etc., as mentioned in the first proviso to Section 497(1), irrespective of the category of the offense, bail is to be granted as a rule and refusal as an exception in the same manner as it is granted or refused in offenses that do not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497(1) CrPC. These exceptions are well settled by several judgments of the Supreme Court. They are the likelihood that the accused: (a) abscond to escape trial; (b) tamper with the prosecution evidence or influence the prosecution witnesses to obstruct the course of justice; or (c) repeat the offense keeping in view his previous criminal record, nature of the offense or the desperate manner in which he has prima facie acted in the commission of the offense. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
693 Criminal Miscelleneous 461/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mohib (Applicant) VS DIG Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
694 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 182/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 YASEEN S/O GORA MIAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-24 No Quantum of punishment is an independent aspect of Criminal Administration of Justice which, too, requires to be done keeping the concept of punishment in view. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
695 Const. P. 1180/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Marvi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
696 Const. P. 487/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zaheer Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
697 Const. P. 486/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Niaz Hussain Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
698 Const. P. 572/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hamz Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
699 Cr.Bail 162/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhib and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes Keeping in view of the severity of the offense, bail is denied to the applicants at this stage, with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial within two months. However, it is made clear that in case of failure on the part of the trial Court to comply with the directions as contained in the order dated 07.08.2024 passed by this court in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.387 of 2024, the matter will be referred to the MIT-II of this Court for placing the matter before the competent authority for appropriate Orders on the administrative side. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
700 Const. P. 269/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mst Rabia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
701 Const. P. 221/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Baz mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
702 Const. P. 285/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Qurban Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
703 Cr.Bail 1260/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Kamran @ Wago S/o Fareed Gul (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes The offense under section 353, P.P.C. is bailable and punishable for 2 years or a fine. As far as section 324 PPC is concerned, in an attempt to murder case falling within the ambit of section 324, P.P.C., the nature of the act done, the intention of the offender and the circumstances leading to the occurrence are the essential ingredients, which need to be probed into determine the guilt or otherwise of an accused as the police officials have not sustained any injury on their body. As such the subject offenses do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 (1) Cr.P.C. However to ascertain the offense for an attempt to murder the police officials, and bullet injuries sustained by the accused on the lower part of his leg requires serious consideration and further probe as none of the police personnel sustained any injury, and it is for the learned trial Court to thresh out the truth after recording the evidence being adduced by the prosecution and defense during trial. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
704 Const. P. 669/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Waheed Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
705 Criminal Miscelleneous 432/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 M. Sarfraz & others (Applicant) VS SHO PS Kot Ghulam Muhammad & ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
706 Const. P. 1197/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
707 Const. P. 5309/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Sidra & Another (Petitioner) VS The State and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-24 Yes In view of the statement of the parties, coupled with the report of the Investigation officer to the effect that the case has been recommended for C Class, therefore, the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 536 of 2024 registered for offenses under section 365-B, PPC needs to be quashed. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to, however, such order shall be passed by the Magistrate on the report submitted under section 173 Cr. P.C. within one week. 6. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
708 Const. P. 4745/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Tufail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-DEC-24 Yes The Supreme Court's judgment, being in rem, applies to all and can be referenced even if the petitioner was not directly involved in the case. However, the Sindh government incorrectly repatriated the petitioner to a non-existent organization at the relevant time. They should have sent him to the Establishment Division as per the Supreme Court's order. But at the same time, we are cognizant of the fact that a non-civil servant does not fall under the category of individuals covered by Section 11-A of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. This section specifically applies to civil servants who are rendered surplus due to the reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not subject to the provisions of the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the employing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not apply to non-civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
709 Const. P. 646/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ameer Ali Rajper (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
710 Const. P. 186/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Saleem Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
711 Const. P. 1682/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Zaheer Ahmed Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
712 Const. P. 938/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Rashid Ali Pitafi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
713 Cr.Bail 16/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hamayoon Shahzad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
714 Const. P. 193/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
715 Const. P. 963/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Anwar Ali Chang & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
716 Const. P. 1025/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Murk Zehra (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
717 Const. P. 1671/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mumtaz Ali Jalbani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
718 Const. P. 331/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Hassnain Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
719 Criminal Miscelleneous 529/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Hantho @ Hansraj (Applicant) VS Learned Session Judge Tharparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-OCT-24 Yes Section 22-A of Cr.P.C. limits a Justice of Peace's role to ensuring whether a cognizable offense is apparent from a complaint. If so, he can order police to record the statement under section 154 Cr.P.C. His function is to assist the Criminal Justice System, not to investigate or prosecute. The prompt registration of a First Information Report (FIR) is a crucial aspect of criminal justice systems. An Officer In-Charge of a Police Station is obligated to record an FIR when a cognizable offense is reported, regardless of the truthfulness of the information. This duty is separate from the subsequent investigation process. The failure to register an FIR can have serious consequences for victims and can hinder justice. Investigating officers must conduct impartial and honest investigations. They should follow the law and aim to bring the truth to light. If an FIR is not registered or a statement is not recorded, the aggrieved person can file an application under Section 22-A of the Cr.P.C. The Justice of Peace will then examine the application and pass an appropriate order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
720 Const. P. 987/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mir Hassan Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
721 Const. P. 364/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mujahid Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
722 Const. P. 5887/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Sajjad Ahmed Sunny and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-24 Yes We do not agree with the findings of the IGP Sindh and other members of the Committee for the simple reason that transferring the investigation wing to the Executive branch is not justified by the Police Act or the Police Rules 1934, citing para 56 of the Gul Hassan Jatoi judgment. The transfer of investigation officers to the Executive branch contradicts the Supreme Court's judgment as their appointment letters as Inspector Investigations limit their transfer and posting to the Executive Branch, is a matter of their terms and conditions of service and is outside the jurisdiction of the court under Article 212 of the Constitution. Therefore, the petitioners cannot be allowed to be transferred from the Investigation wing to perform their service in the Executive Branch of the Police Department. The petition is dismissed as it lacks merit as well. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
723 Const. P. 818/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Jamshed (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
724 Criminal Miscelleneous 370/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Somji Mal (Applicant) VS SSP Umerkot & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-24 No Disposed of as not pressed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
725 Const. P. 600/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
726 Const. P. 693/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Malik Irfanullah Aman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
727 Const. P. 4561/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Nighat Nasreen Zaidi & another (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
728 Const. P. 7077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahbaz Garment (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2873/2018,C.M.A.8722/2018,C.M.A.8723/2018,C.M.A.8724/2018,C.M.A.8725/2018,C.P.461-K/2019,C.P.462-K/2019,C.P.463-K/2019,C.P.464-K/2019,C.P.465-K/2019,C.P.466-K/2019,C.P.467-K/2019,C.P.468-K/2019,C.A.98-K/2019,C.A.99-K/2019,C.A.100-K/2019,C.A.101-K/2019,C.A.65-K/2019,C.A.102-K/2019,C.A.103-K/2019,C.A.104-K/2019,C.A.105-K/2019,C.A.106-K/2019,C.A.107-K/2019,C.A.108-K/2019,C.A.109-K/2019,C.A.110-K/2019,C.A.111-K/2019,C.A.112-K/2019,C.A.113-K/2019,C.A.114-K/2019,C.A.115-K/2019,C.A.117-K/2019,C.A.116-K/2019,C.P.469-K/2019,C.P.470-K/2019,C.P.471-K/2019,C.P.472-K/2019,C.P.473-K/2019,C.P.474-K/2019,C.P.475-K/2019,C.P.476-K/2019,C.P.477-K/2019,C.P.478-K/2019,C.P.479-K/2019,C.P.480-K/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
729 Const. P. 2187/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) VS Chairman KPT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
730 Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-20 Yes Under Article 199 of Constitution In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the Judgment dated 23.01.2018 passed by this Court affirmed by the Honble Supreme Court vide order dated 09.07.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.322-K / 2018 has not been complied with in its letter and spirit. Therefore, at this juncture, prima facie, Petitioner No.2 has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 read with Article 204 of the Constitution, as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the Judgment. The listed application bearing (CMA No. 7200 of 2019), is adjourned to be taken up in the second week of January 2021. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
731 Const. P. 448/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Khalid Inayat & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.57-K/2018 Munawar Ali and others v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.49-K/2018 Bilal Rasool and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
732 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-21 Yes recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
733 Const. P. 1940/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Prof: Jan Muhammad Memon (Petitioner) VS Governor of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2715/2018 Professor Jan Muhammad Memon v. The Governor of Sindh/Chancellor thr. the Principal Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
734 2018 PLC CS 535 Const. P. 7348/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Suleman Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
735 Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Habib Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Safeer Ahmed & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
736 Cr.Bail 1624/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 MUHAMMAD SALEEM S/O ALI AKBAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
737 2018 PLC (CS) Note 109 Const. P. 407/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Mr. Ghulam Akbar Allana (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
738 2018 SCMR 2116 Const. P. 4428/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ahmed Ali Bhambro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.80-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others,C.P.440-K/2017 National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Ahmed Ali Bhambro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
739 2019 PLC (CS) Note 14 Const. P. 4053/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Maqbool Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
740 2018 MLD 832 Cr.Bail 977/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD YOUNUS S/O SHAMSUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
741 Const. P. 4542/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rehman (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Police & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
742 Const. P. 729/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Sher Muhammad Zafar (Petitioner) VS Chairman PIA (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
743 Const. P. 684/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
744 Const. P. 1526/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.441-K/2022 Lyari Development Authority & another v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
745 Const. P. 5542/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Noorullah Abro & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3657/2017,C.A.1599/2017,C.P.3664/2017,C.P.4780/2017,C.P.3708/2017,C.P.3658/2017,C.A.1606/2017,C.A.1596/2017,C.A.1595/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Disposed of as not pressed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
746 Const. P. 3607/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 abc (Petitioner) VS xyz (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
747 I. A 13/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Muhammad Yousif & others (Appellant) VS Land Acquisition Officer/ Assistant Commissioner and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
748 Const. P. 1047/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Vice Chancellor, Peoples University of Medical (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
749 2023 SBLR Sindh 1493 Const. P. 1375/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.410-K/2019 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy/Irrigation Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
750 Const. P. 357/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Irshad Ali &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 No Seeking direction to hold inquiry in respect of funds released to union council taluka Ghulam Muhammad. in support only two applications attached. petition dismissed on the ground that he may approach the authority concerned for relief being sought. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
751 Const. P. 1092/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Misri and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
752 Const. P. 771/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Amanullah.. (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.168-K/2012 Amanullah v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Education & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
753 Const. P. 2343/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Muhammad Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.205-K/2013 Muhammad Sarwar v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.257-K/2013 Muhammad Sarwar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed
754 II.A. 43/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Saba and others (Appellant) VS Mst. Fatima and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
755 Const. P. 1159/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Allah Dino (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
756 Const. P. 357/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ishrat (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
757 Const. P. 2487/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Faheem (Petitioner) VS P.O. SIndh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
758 Const. P. 77/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
759 Const. P. 1952/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Ali Ammar Jafry and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.424-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited and another v. Syed Ali Ammaar Jafrey and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
760 Const. P. 1185/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Sher (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
761 Const. P. 3172/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Husan Nayab (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
762 Const. P. 1836/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shoukat Hayat Awan (Petitioner) VS A.I.G and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
763 Const. P. 7998/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zain ul Abideen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
764 Const. P. 384/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
765 Const. P. 2912/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zafar Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes PTV---since the representation of the petitioner has already been decided and prima-facie there is findings against him and the said findings are not impugned before this court, thus cannot be dilated upon. In view of such state of affairs, we without touching the merits of the case on the issue of his promotion in the next Rank, hold that, basically the purpose of filling of this lis is over, thus cannot be stretched further, on the premise that once the Respondent-Pakistan Television Corporation has decided the representation of the Petitioner which provides him fresh cause of action if he at all feels himself aggrieved of such order on his representation, he can file fresh petition if he is so advised, subject to all just exceptions. Disposed of. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4404/2019 Zafar Akbar v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Information, Government of Pakisan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
766 Const. P. 2250/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Rizwan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
767 Const. P. 5758/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ambreen Naz (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
768 Const. P. 2289/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Raja Pervez Iqbal and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.588-K/2017 Raja Pervez Iqbal and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
769 Cr.Rev 165/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 PERVAIZ S/O ISMAIL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
770 Const. P. 968/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
771 Const. P. 368/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Silk Bank Limited & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.278-K/2019 Muhammad Siddique v. Silk Bank Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
772 Const. P. 338/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Iqbal @ Kallo & Others (Petitioner) VS Mst Eidi Begum & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
773 Const. P. 1097/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Bakhu Khan (Petitioner) VS Aamir Noor & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
774 Const. P. 422/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Arshad (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
775 Const. P. 2230/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Agha Asghar Ali Babar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
776 Const. P. 160/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qadeer and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
777 Const. P. 372/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Kifayatullah (Petitioner) VS Manager Airport Security and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
778 Const. P. 1804/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Naseebullah and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
779 Const. P. 1415/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 KPT Democratic Workers Union (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
780 Const. P. 580/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 K.P.T Democratic Workers Union & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
781 Const. P. 2254/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Gulsher (Petitioner) VS Provinve Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
782 Const. P. 189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
783 Cr.Misc. 156/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mst. Sukhan Khatoon Jatoi (Applicant) VS The State & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
784 Cr.Bail 4/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MOHISIN ABBAS & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
785 Cr.Misc. 402/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Abdul Wahab (Applicant) VS The State and 12 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
786 2020 SBLR Sindh 943 Cr.Bail 944/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shadu & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
787 Const. P. 284/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mian Tahir Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
788 Const. P. 6352/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faheem Ahmed Attari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
789 Const. P. 698/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
790 Const. P. 3390/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Sukhio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
791 Cr.Bail 1860/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 SHARIQ ALI SIDDIQUI S/O MMUHAMMAD TAUFIQ & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
792 Const. P. 1498/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Ali Akbar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.M.Appeal.12/2019 Ali Akbar v. Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
793 Const. P. 2689/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Huzoor Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
794 Const. P. 1035/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Sabir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
795 Const. P. 48/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Hashim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS D.C Mirpurkhas (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
796 Const. P. 1502/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Masood Akhtar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.331-K/2019 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. and others v. Masood Akhtar and others,C.A.1-K/2020 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. and others v. Masood Akhtar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned for December, 24.
797 Const. P. 3330/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Kishore Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
798 Const. P. 1983/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rafique Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
799 Const. P. 1396/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Mujeeb Alam (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
800 Cr.Bail 326/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Javeed Iqbal Qureshi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
801 Const. P. 6381/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Barkat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
802 Const. P. 1281/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Ishrat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
803 Const. P. 6848/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Human Help Welfar Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
804 Const. P. 6933/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shahmir Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
805 Const. P. 8518/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Munner Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3793/2018 Muneer Ahmed & another v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
806 Const. P. 1887/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Altaf Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
807 Const. P. 467/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Ali Bahar Jafferi (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Garhi Yasin & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
808 Const. P. 1412/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rao Khalid and Ors (Petitioner) VS D.G SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
809 2020 PLC (CS) Note 3 Const. P. 5083/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS THe Chairman P.N.S.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
810 Const. P. 855/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Hantex (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
811 Const. P. 1741/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ali Murad Brohi (Petitioner) VS Zarai Tarqiati Bank and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.126-K/2019 Ali Murad Brohi v. Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
812 Const. P. 786/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amanullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
813 Const. P. 4224/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
814 2019 PLC (CS) Note 53 Const. P. 688/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Rehmatullah and others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
815 Const. P. 3638/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Saad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.114-K/2019 Barkat Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
816 Const. P. 251/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Javed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
817 Const. P. 423/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amanullah Khoso (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4379/2017 Amanullah Khoso v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another,C.A.1608/2017 Amanullah Khoso v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
818 Const. P. 2082/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Brigadier (R) Kamran Jalil (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.490-K/2021 Brig (R) Kamran Jalil v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
819 Const. P. 499/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Inam Hafiz Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
820 Const. P. 598/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Al-Hadi Textile Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
821 Const. P. 482/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2972/2018 M/s The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.75-K/2019 M/s The Agha Khan Hospital & Medical Foundation, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.P.256-K/2020 Mst. Sabra v. Muhammad Jamil & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
822 Const. P. 2263/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2977/2018 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.80-K/2019 M/s Descon Engineering Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
823 Const. P. 5586/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohsin Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1605/2017,C.P.3666/2017,C.P.3674/2017,C.P.3665/2017,C.A.1600/2017,C.A.1601/2017 SCP Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed
824 Cr.Rev 173/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 KANWAR NAVEED JAMIL S/O KANWAR JAMIL AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
825 Const. P. 5960/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Raja Shoaib and Ors (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh Police and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
826 Const. P. 417/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mujtaba Hassan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
827 2019 PLC (CS) 1050 Const. P. 4257/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ahsan Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
828 Const. P. 846/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed.
829 2019 PLD SC 710, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 118 Const. P. 4177/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Parveen Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.664-K/2017 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.130-K/2019 Parveen Shoukat v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
830 Const. P. 6198/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
831 2020 PLC (CS) 24 Const. P. 562/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nabeela Ashfaq (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
832 2018 YLR 672 Cr.Bail 330/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 IFTIKHAR GADAR S/O ABDUL RAZZAQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
833 Const. P. 7118/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Muhammad Yousuf Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
834 2019 PTD 1765 Const. P. 544/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ali Zahir Jafri (Petitioner) VS Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.638-K/2018 Ali Zahir Jafri v. The Chairman Federal Board of Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
835 Const. P. 4506/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.267-K/2019 Mushtaque Ahmed v. Member Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
836 Const. P. 8374/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Majeed Memon (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
837 Const. P. 950/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Qurban ali (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S Airport Larkana and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
838 Cr.Bail 226/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Abdul Hameed Shaikh & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
839 Const. P. 4533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nova Leather (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
840 Const. P. 897/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s International Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
841 Const. P. 1272/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Aga Khan Maternal & Child Care Health Centre (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2974/2018 M/s The Agha Khan Maternal & Child Care Centre Hyderabad, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.77-K/2019 M/s The Agha Khan Maternal & Child Care Centre Hyderabad, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
842 Const. P. 1740/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ismail Ind Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
843 Const. P. 2873/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Lotte Kolson (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3101/2018 M/s Lottee Kolson Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.91-K/2019 M/s Lottee Kolson Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
844 Const. P. 1766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s A.F.K Fashion (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
845 Cr.Bail 324/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Allahwasayo son of Shaif Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
846 Cr.Bail 156/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Asghar Ali S/o Khambro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
847 Cr.Bail 316/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Ghulam Mujtaba son of Imam Din by caste Lakho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
848 Cr.J.A 81/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2011 Abdul Fattah @ Fattoo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-JUL-19 Yes Criminal Whether every member of an unlawful assembly, in respect of an offence committed in prosecution of common object/intention, is guilty of that offence? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
849 Const. P. 2071/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
850 Const. P. 1406/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nehal Chang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
851 Const. P. 199/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Talib Hussain (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
852 Const. P. 332/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mir Peer Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
853 Const. P. 2195/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Danish (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
854 Const. P. 2770/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulqarnain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
855 Const. P. 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Jabbar& another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
856 Const. P. 229/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Roubi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
857 Const. P. 1168/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shoukat Ali Uner and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
858 Const. P. 2449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Bawani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
859 Const. P. 1133/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
860 Const. P. 1497/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
861 Const. P. 1623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Faisal Ahmed Talpur & others (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Irrigation and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
862 Const. P. 1749/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 HuzoorBux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
863 Const. P. 2058/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
864 Const. P. 2339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Baqa Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
865 Const. P. 1500/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
866 Const. P. 1540/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Noor Ahmed &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
867 Const. P. 1822/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Peer Bux Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
868 Civil Revision 179/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Azeema Khatoon and others (Applicant) VS Hakim zadi and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
869 Const. P. 3360/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
870 Const. P. 399/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Salman Hussain Zubairi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
871 Const. P. 102/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Zulekhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
872 2020 SBLR Sindh 365 Const. P. 1589/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 1589 of 2013,CP No. D- 1803 of 2015,CP No D- 2423 of 2015,CP No. D- 2834 of 2015,CP No. D- 847 of 2016, CP No. D- 958 of 2016, CP No. D- 1071 of 2016, CP No. D- 1173 of 2016, CP No. D- 1826 of 2016, CP No. D- 2179 of 2016, CP No. D- 2539 of 2016, CP No. D- 2656 of 2016, CP No. D- 2776 of 2016, CP No. D- 2941 of 2016, CP No. D- 3078 of 2016, CP No. D- 3148 of 2016, CP No. D- 3212 of 2016, CP No. D- 3391 of 2016, CP No. D- 3445 of 2016, CP No. D- 02 of 2017, CP No. D- 43 of 2017, CP No. D- 201 of 2017, CP No. D- 291 of 2017, CP No. D- 301 of 2017, CP No. D- 314 of 2017, CP No. D- 322 of 2017, CP No. D- 379 of 2017, CP No. D- 478 of 2017, CP No. D- 547 of 2017, CP No. D- 639 of 2017, CP No. D- 733 of 2017, CP No. D- 729 of 2017, CP No. D- 917 of 2017, CP No. D- 1000 of 2017, CP No. D- 1054 of 2017, CP No. D- 1067 of 2017, CP No. D- 1084 of 2017, CP No. D- 1085 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1086 of 2017, CP No. D- 1168 of 2017, CP No. D- 1174 of 2017, CP No. D- 1237 of 2017, CP No. D- 1359 of 2017, CP No. D- 1446 of 2017, CP No. D- 1344 of 2017, CP No. D- 1533 of 2017, CP No. D- 1576 of 2017, CP No. D- 1727 of 2017, CP No. D- 2071 of 2017, CP No. D- 2137 of 2017, CP No. D- 2403 of 2017, CP No. D- 2452 of 2017, CP No. D- 2608 of 2017, CP No. D- 2634 of 2017, CP No. D- 2835 of 2017, CP No. D- 2879 of 2017, CP No. D- 3018 of 2017, CP No. D- 3130 of 2017, CP No. D- 3273 of 2017, CP No. D- 3341 of 2017, CP No. D- 3345 of 2017, CP No. D- 3369 of 2017, CP No. D- 3696 of 2017, CP No. D- 3742 of 2017, CP No. D- 3808 of 2017, CP No. D- 129 of 2018, CP No. D- 163 of 2018, CP No. D- 332 of 2018, CP No. D- 413 of 2018, CP No. D- 505 of 2018, CP No. D- 736 of 2018, CP No. D- 1066 of 2018, CP No. D- 1526 of 2018, CP No. D- 2094 of 2018, CP No. D- 2194 of 2018, CP No. D- 2195 of 2018, CP No. D- 2334 of 2018, CP No. D- 2366 of 2018, CP No. D- 2451 of 2018, CP No. D- 2469 of 2018, CP No. D- 2683 of 2018, CP No. D- 3069 of 2018, CP No. D- 3215 of 2018, CP No. D- 3218 of 2018, CP No. D- 3221 of 2018, CP No. D- 3302 of 2018, CP No. D- 84 of 2019, CP No. D- 108 of 2019, CP No. D- 369 of 2019, CP No. D- 436 of 2019, CP No. D- 544 of 2019, CP No. D- 696 of 2019, CP No. D- 1137 of 2019, CP No. D- 1609 of 2019, CP No. D- 1683 of 2019, CP No. D- 1827 of 2019, CP No. D- 1836 of 2019, CP No. D- 1904 of 2019, CP No. D- 1929 of 2019 2013 Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
873 Const. P. 2715/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yameen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.740-K/2019 Muhammad Yameen v. Chairman Sindh Irrigation & Drainage Authority (SDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
874 Const. P. 511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Farooque (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
875 Const. P. 5866/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Faisal Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-19 Yes The basic grievance of the Petitioner is with regard to his surrendering of look after charge for the post of Regional Director BPS-19 in Sindh Katchi Abbadis Authority (SKAA) --Dismissed Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
876 2020 PLC (CS) 1359 H.C.A 15/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Karachi International container Terminal Ltd. (Appellant) VS Brig (Retd.) Arif Mahmud Malik (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
877 Const. P. 2557/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Samad Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
878 Const. P. 1173/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Usman Siddique & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
879 Const. P. 1054/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Hakeem Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Ministry of Water & Power and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
880 Const. P. 1344/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Mangial Shah @ Shaman Sain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
881 Const. P. 1576/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
882 Const. P. 2201/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zafar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
883 Const. P. 1882/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
884 Const. P. 655/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
885 Const. P. 523/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
886 Const. P. 1080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
887 Const. P. 314/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
888 Const. P. 2634/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
889 Const. P. 872/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
890 Const. P. 6070/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Niaz Hussain Awan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.513-K/2019 Niaz Hussain Awan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
891 Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes Contempt--Prima-facie the question of downgrading some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved persons to avail their respective remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
892 2022 PLC (CS) 454 Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-20 No Contempt--SSGC--We are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met if the respondent-company is granted last opportunity to comply with the direction of this Court as well as the Honorable Supreme Court in the instant matter without fail within two (02) weeks and to submit compliance report to this Court on the next date of hearing, failing which show cause notice shall be issued to alleged contemnors on the next date of hearing--To be listed on 09.11.2020 at 11:00 a.m., when alleged contemnors must be present in Court along with their compliance report. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
893 Const. P. 5649/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rao Muhammad Gulzar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-SEP-19 No In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases, the instant Petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the Petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3977/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd, Karachi v. Rao Muhammad Gulzar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
894 Const. P. 298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
895 Const. P. 3693/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Devjee (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
896 Const. P. 8186/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Kashif (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.692-K/2019 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.21-K/2022 Muhammad Kashif v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
897 Const. P. 2510/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst.Razia Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
898 Const. P. 1609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Inam Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
899 Const. P. 1827/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalid Javed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
900 Const. P. 950/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Director Nara Canal Irrigation Department and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
901 Const. P. 2060/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Murtaza & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
902 Const. P. 942/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sikandar Hayat & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
903 Const. P. 1596/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Umar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
904 Const. P. 6051/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sohrab Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
905 Const. P. 633/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Israr ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Sindh Educational Foundation & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.533-K/2019 Israr-ul-Haq v. Ms Naheed Shah Durrani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
906 Const. P. 6816/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
907 Const. P. 5162/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Raees Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-19 Yes Pakistan-Steel Mill--whether the instant petition is suffering from laches or otherwise--petitioner is not entitled for relief which he is asking for through the instant proceedings on the premise that this Court cannot entertain the grievance of the Petitioner under Article 199 of the Constitution, in view of the bar contained under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution, which ousts the jurisdiction of this Court. The ouster clause under Article 212 (3) and Article 185 of the Constitution is a Constitutional command, which restricts the jurisdiction of this Court on the subject, which squarely falls within the exclusive domain of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, being an Appellate Court in respect of the decisions of this Court and Service Tribunals. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.594-K/2019 Raees Ahmed Ansari v. Pakistan Steel Mills thr. Chairman and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
908 Const. P. 231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Associate Professor Saeeda Parveen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
909 Const. P. 1140/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Awais (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
910 Const. P. 3319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Suresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
911 Const. P. 1708/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
912 Const. P. 3387/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
913 Const. P. 2177/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Intezar Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
914 Const. P. 83/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
915 Const. P. 2854/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Bakhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
916 Const. P. 2129/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raza Khan Sawati and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
917 Const. P. 1533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
918 Const. P. 3018/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nafees Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
919 Const. P. 2444/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faisal Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
920 Const. P. 2216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Noumanullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
921 Const. P. 2232/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Saifullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
922 Const. P. 317/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
923 Const. P. 224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Gul Bahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
924 Const. P. 3274/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
925 Const. P. 8330/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shabana Rizvi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
926 Const. P. 3082/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Fida Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 No Contempt Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
927 Const. P. 2776/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Miss Nasreen Qadri (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
928 Const. P. 3600/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Atique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
929 Const. P. 2574/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Nabi & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
930 Const. P. 495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
931 Const. P. 634/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Abdul Wahid & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
932 Const. P. 504/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Syed Noor Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS The Learned Election Tribunal Ps 52 Umarkot (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
933 Cr.J.A 90/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ahsan @ Keso (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
934 Const. P. 1270/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jhando Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
935 Const. P. 6529/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shahzad Aslam (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
936 Const. P. 6531/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
937 Const. P. 6538/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Miandad Unar (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
938 Const. P. 617/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Boota and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
939 Const. P. 450/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Shafi Throgh His LRS (Petitioner) VS Raja Muhammad Bashir Khan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
940 M.A. 1/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 (HESCO) Hyderabad (Applicant) VS Muhammad Tanveer & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
941 Const. P. 1301/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-20 Yes contempt applications in the case of Sindh Textbook Board contempt applications in the case of Sindh Textbook Board Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1290/2020 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
942 Civil Revision 187/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) VS Maqsood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
943 Const. P. 3766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Kishwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1801/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Kishwar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
944 Const. P. 597/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Mohammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
945 Const. P. 317/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.569-K/2020 Muhammad Irfan v. Mst.Saima & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
946 Const. P. 3385/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Assadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
947 Const. P. 246/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sht. Kiran & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
948 Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-20 No Before parting with this case, we are constrained to observe that the conduct of respondent No.2 does not appear to be proper and reasonable as notifications of postings have been issued by him one after the other in an indiscriminate manner by giving acting and or additional charge as stop gap arrangement to junior officers in utter disregard and violation of the law laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court and this Court. We were about to call respondent No.2 before this Court in person in order to explain his conduct, but in view of the assurance given on his behalf by learned AAG that he shall not repeat the above mistakes in future, we have decided to not call respondent No.2 for the time being. However, he is warned to be careful in future. Chief Secretary Sindh is directed to ensure that all the transfers, postings, etc. in his department are done by respondent No.2 strictly in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon???ble Supreme Court and this Court. Before parting with this case, we are constrained to observe that the conduct of respondent No.2 does not appear to be proper and reasonable as notifications of postings have been issued by him one after the other in an indiscriminate manner by giving acting and or additional charge as stop gap arrangement to junior officers in utter disregard and violation of the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court and this Court. We were about to call respondent No.2 before this Court in person in order to explain his conduct, but in view of the assurance given on his behalf by learned AAG that he shall not repeat the above mistakes in future, we have decided to not call respondent No.2 for the time being. However, he is warned to be careful in future. Chief Secretary Sindh is directed to ensure that all the transfers, postings, etc. in his department are done by respondent No.2 strictly in accordance with the law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court and this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
949 Const. P. 5603/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hassan Azhar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills Corp and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
950 Const. P. 570/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
951 Const. P. 218/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Miss Shanaz Anwar (Petitioner) VS D.I.G. Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
952 Const. P. 626/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Manzoor Ahmed Laghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
953 I. A 31/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Government of Sindh & others (Appellant) VS M/S United Bank Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-19 Yes Appeal was allowed with costs and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
954 Const. P. 447/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nazeer Ahmed & others. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
955 Const. P. 7359/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nazar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
956 Const. P. 3376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zafar Azeem & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.85-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Zafar Azeem & others,C.P.748-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Zafar Azeem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
957 Const. P. 2080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hafizullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.86-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Hafeezullah Mashoori & others,C.P.749-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Hafeezullah Mashoori & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
958 Const. P. 3978/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
959 Criminal Appeal 13/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Fahad. (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
960 Const. P. 825/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes release his monthly salary--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
961 Const. P. 4528/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Ghafoor (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
962 Const. P. 4105/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-20 Yes this petition is allowed in the terms whereby the competent authority of CAA is directed to consider the case of petitioner for his proforma promotion in PG-10, Works and Development Directorate, CAA for the purpose of pensionery benefits within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order strictly in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
963 Const. P. 738/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Qadir Kaloi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
964 Cr.Misc. 356/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Syed Touqeer Shah (Applicant) VS The State & (04) Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
965 Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-20 Yes transfer and posting transfer and posting Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
966 Const. P. 664/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Momina & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
967 Const. P. 5650/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Reshma (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
968 Const. P. 2157/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kashmir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
969 Const. P. 2445/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mubin Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sinior Director, HR Management KMC & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No Service matter. Notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 20.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned order shall remain suspended. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
970 Const. P. 1457/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aqeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
971 Const. P. 347/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr M.H Mughal (Khi To Hyd) (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
972 Const. P. 788/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sher and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
973 2023 PLC CS 48 Const. P. 2406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khairullah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.633-K/2020 Khairullah Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary of Universilies Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
974 Const. P. 245/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Faiza Bibi & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
975 Cr.Bail 341/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Abdul Hameed Seelro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
976 Const. P. 664/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Iqbal & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
977 Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
978 Civil Revision 157/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Nazeer (Applicant) VS PO SINDH (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
979 Const. P. 4527/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
980 Criminal Appeal 126/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Taimoor Badshah and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
981 Const. P. 5931/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imtiaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-20 Yes Actualization of promotion in BPS-19 and posting--The transfer and posting of a civil/government servant is prerogative of the Government, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, petitioner is under obligation to serve anywhere in the province, he has no vested right to remain at particular post for indefinite period, therefore the petitioner cannot ask for posting at particular place. Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
982 Cr.J.A 96/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Ashraf @ Ashoo Channo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
983 Const. P. 1648/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Yaseen & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
984 Const. P. 5682/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-20 Yes Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. Appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota---In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of son quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
985 Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
986 Const. P. 5337/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Alsons Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Alsons Ind Peoples Empl: Union and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
987 Const. P. 1748/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Allah Jurio (Petitioner) VS Commandant/Principal Cadet College Sanghar (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
988 Const. P. 663/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Danish Sanober (Petitioner) VS KPT and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes KPT-Termination--Besides respondents have leveled serious allegations against the petitioner about his appointment at the back door, and subsequent involvement in criminal activities, his absence from duty due to certain political/ criminal activities as discussed supra. Keeping in view the above-mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
989 Const. P. 3479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Irfanullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years??? service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Meter Reader, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits--In view of the above discussion, this petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority of respondents to include nine (09) years service of daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular and recalculate his service / retiring dues and other allied benefits and the same be paid to him in accordance with law. Respondents are further directed to process and complete the entire service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of receiving this judgment. No order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1662/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Irfan Ullah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
990 Const. P. 7090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Atam Parkash Chanani & Another (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
991 Const. P. 2860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-20 Yes chowkidar in the office of District & Sessions Judge, Karachi East based on son quota--Therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings as it would fall within mischief of constructive res-judicata. Reliance is placed on the case of State Bank of Pakistan through Governor and others vs. Imtiaz Ali Khan and others (2012 SCMR 280). 5. In our view, once the stance of the petitioner on the aforesaid analogy has been set at rest by the Administrative Committee, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution as writ does not lie against such decision of the Administrative Committee. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
992 Cr.J.A 202/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Manzoor Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
993 Const. P. 34/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sitara (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
994 Const. P. 724/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Aslam Rana & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.739-K/2022 Syed Hassan Haider & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session -- Before 3 HJJ ]
995 Const. P. 4535/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Wahab (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
996 Const. P. 331/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqas Behlum (Petitioner) VS KPT and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 Yes KPT-fresh show cause notice--allegations of misconduct--It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During arguments, we have been informed that the petitioners service has not yet been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings, however, they are at liberty to conclude the disciplinary proceedings (if not earlier concluded) within a reasonable time under law after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
997 Const. P. 2332/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Aftab Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1321-K/2022 Khalid Hussain v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
998 Const. P. 2126/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
999 Const. P. 2092/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1000 Const. P. 2644/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mir Imadad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst Sajida & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1001 Const. P. 528/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ashraf Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1002 Const. P. 1616/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1003 Cr.J.A 222/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saleem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.364/2020 Saleem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1004 Criminal Appeal 51/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 ASGHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1005 Const. P. 763/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayub Khan (Petitioner) VS The Dist & Session Judge West and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-FEB-21 Yes the appointment of sons of deceased/retired and serving employees of the District and subordinate Courts--whether the Petitioners son is entitled to be appointed on the son quota basis in view of policy decision /directives of the Honble Chief Justice of this Court vide letters dated 03.03.2010, 23.7.2012 & 4.3.2013--In the light of the above rule position, no further action is required on our part in exercising the power under Article 199 of the Constitution on the premise that petitioner failed to point out any administrative decision of the member of the subordinate judiciary; and, merely agitating the claim that his son was not accommodated in the Judicial District was/is no ground to direct the respondent No.1 to appoint his son. However, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for the post on merit as and when the vacancy occurs in the office of District & Sessions, Judge Karachi West. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.544-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The District & Sessions Judge Karachi (West) & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1006 Const. P. 1952/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syeda Anjum Ali Sehar Sehrish (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1007 Const. P. 400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mir Qadir Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1008 Const. P. 7112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Ahmed Butt (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shaheen Afroz and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 Yes Family Pension Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1009 Const. P. 550/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Hakim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1010 Const. P. 9013/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raja Naved Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-20 Yes fake appointment--Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Hon???ble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. Petitioner claims to have been appointed on 22.11.2011 as Police Constable in Sindh Police department and has been performing his duties at different police stations and due to involvement of his uncle in departmental proceedings, he has been deprived of his salary which has not been paid to him since September, 2018---Reverting to the claim of the petitioner that he was legally appointed and the Honble Supreme Court has not given any observation against him, therefore the Respondents cannot stop his salary as he is still working on his post, suffice to say that the petitioner is Civil Servant therefore, the forum chosen by him by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law in view of the bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution. Since the expression terms and conditions includes salary and the Sindh Services Tribunal has jurisdiction to decide such issue and the validity of the impugned action, this petition is not maintainable. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1011 Const. P. 432/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shaheen Airport Services Hanrd Worker Union (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1012 Const. P. 1926/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1013 Const. P. 7604/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Shoaib Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-20 Yes petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. petitioner has assailed order dated 12.9.2018, passed by respondent-Karachi Electric (K.E) whereby he was dismissed from service on the charge of misconduct--assailed the same before NIRC--There is no cavil to what the respondent-K.E says to the extent that case of the petitioner should be decided by the appellate forum i.e. Full Bench of NIRC, if petitioner approaches them with an application for condoning the delay in filing of the case before the NIRC. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision dated 11.06.2019 rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2019--We, in the circumstances, dispose of this petition with no order as to costs with the observation that if petitioner approaches the competent / appellate forum against the impugned orders passed by the respondents, the same shall be decided in accordance with law and the question of limitation, if any, shall also be dealt with in accordance with law and keeping in view the grounds to be urged by the petitioner for condoning the delay. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1014 Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-APR-22 Yes A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of service are protected under the constitutional protection. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1015 Const. P. 6563/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mazahar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Senior Director Culture & Sports and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-20 Yes Contempt--This petition was disposed of vide order dated 11.12.2018 with direction to the respondent No.4 to process the case of petitioner in accordance with law and if he qualifies to be appointed / promoted subject to availability of the post, his case may be recommended to Metropolitan Commissioner Karachi for promotion strictly in accordance with the relevant rules and regulations--Therefore, at this juncture, no case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors is made out. Resultantly, CMA No. 7446/2019 is dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1016 Cr.Bail 279/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Abdul Ghaffar Maitlo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1017 Const. P. 1827/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Qasim Soomro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1018 Const. P. 234/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Hidayat Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1019 Const. P. 3315/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-20 Yes We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1020 Const. P. 1069/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Asad Ali (Petitioner) VS NBP and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 No Removal from Service--It is stated that the said order is bad in law as the petitioner was not allowed to participate in the enquiry proceedings as he was in jail---The grievance of the petitioner is that the appeal is not being decided by the appellate authority despite passage of considerable time--Without touching the merits or demerits of the case, the appellate authority of the respondent-bank is directed to decide the petitioner???s appeal within thirty (30) days from today strictly in accordance with law--Disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1021 Const. P. 719/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Ali & another (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1022 Const. P. 178/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1282-K/2020 Muhammad Ali v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1023 Const. P. 882/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Ahmer Hameed S/o Syed Abdul Hameed @ Babar (Petitioner) VS Mst. Iqbal-un-Nisa Begum and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JAN-21 Yes civil dispute between the parties--I am not in agreement with the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner for the simple reason that the petitioner being a Head Constable in the Police Department is/was not required to indulge in such kind of disputes and take advantage of police uniform. Moreover, Petitioners prayer to direct the police officials not to entertain the complaint of the private respondent, prima facie is not maintainable as no ostensible evidence pertaining to any harassment being caused by the police officials to the petitioner has been substantiated to justify interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as the matter of a civil dispute between the parties is being tried by the competent civil Court.--Abdullah Memon, Superintendent of Police Madadgar 15 present in Court states that he will look into the matter and conduct an impartial inquiry. He is directed to hold an inquiry into the matter and if the petitioner is found involved in usurping the private property, he may proceed against him in accordance with law. The parties are at liberty to avail their remedy before the competent forum under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1024 Const. P. 7530/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mir Nusrat Ali Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 No Respondent No.3 KMC is directed to submit a complete list on the next date before this Court of all such retired employees to whom post-retirement benefits have not been paid. The list shall mention their names, dates of their retirement and the amounts payable to them. Adjourned. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1025 Const. P. 733/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Barkat Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1026 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 726 Civil Revision 219/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ayoob, (Applicant) VS PO Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1027 Const. P. 1162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Shabbir Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 No Second Capacity Legal Assistant appointed in BoR Sindh--Notice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1028 Const. P. 807/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Jagdesh R. Mullani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1029 Const. P. 2518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS M/s Hub Domestic Products Pvt Ltd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1030 2023 PLC CS 194 Const. P. 4462/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-21 Yes appointment for the post of Naib Qasid in respondent-School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Sindh--Rule 16 of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1974--The matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondents for afresh decision on the issue of appointment of Naib Qasid under law, and consider the case of the petitioner for the subject post within two months, from the date of receipt of the order of this Court and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1031 Const. P. 1757/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M/s Rashid Silk Mills (Petitioner) VS Board of Trustees of EOBI (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No registration as demanded by the EOBI is against the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1032 Const. P. 1836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s E- Square (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1033 Const. P. 1578/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Saqib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-21 Yes departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated against him and the final order for dismissal from service served upon him, which action of the respondent-department ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal (SST) at Karachi. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1034 Const. P. 5304/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Silver Textile Factory and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1035 Const. P. 5025/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imdad Ali Abro & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 Yes the petitioners are seeking the up-gradation of the post of Computer Operator/Assistant Computer Programmer BS-16 to 17--we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of the Government of Pakistan M/o. Railways v. Jamshed Hussain Cheema and others, 2016 SCMR 442, Regional Commissioner Income Tax, Northern Region, Islamabad, and another Vs. Syed Munawar Ali and others (2017 PLC (C.S.) 1030) and Federal Public Service Commission v. Anwar-ul-Haq (2017 SCMR 890). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts in BPS-17 with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1036 Const. P. 3310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Asad ul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-21 Yes the petitioners are seeking regularization of their services against the quota reserved for deceased civil servants as provided under the Prime Ministers Assistance Package for the Families of Government Employees, on the premise that their parents were serving in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on different posts, who passed away during their service. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1037 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 574/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1038 Const. P. 3550/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arsalan Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes we are clear in our minds that no civil/public Servant of a non-cadre post can be posted, out of cadre. Reliance is placed on the cases of Muhammad Bachal Memon and others vs. Syed Tan veer Hussain Shah and others (2014 SCMR 1539), Contempt proceedings against the Chief Secretary Sindh and others (2013 SCMR 1752), Ali Azhar Khan Baloch v. Province of Sindh (2015 SCMR 456), and Ajmal Hassan Khan and another Versus Government of Sindh and others, 2012 P L C (C.S.) 1153 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1677-K/2021 Arsalan Hassan v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1039 Const. P. 4596/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Employers Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 Yes Title Minimum Wages under the Sindh Minimum Wages Act 2015 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5863/2021,C.P.5800/2021,C.P.64/2022,C.P.1370/2022,C.P.6605/2021,C.P.6606/2021 SCP Pending Adjourned. Club with CA 952/18 etc,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
1040 Const. P. 8706/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tabassum Jafri and Ors (Petitioner) VS NBP and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1041 Const. P. 8006/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2940/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.481/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
1042 Const. P. 7129/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Jawed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.807-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Javed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1043 Const. P. 8065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-21 Yes we asked the learned counsel for respondent-Institution under what law and authority they attempted to nullify the effect of the judgment passed by this Court, maintained by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4384/2021 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI) & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.10973/21 for impleadment is Dismissed as not pressed.
1044 Const. P. 2575/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Samiullah (Petitioner) VS Board of Trustees KPT and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1045 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 552/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1046 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 575/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1047 Const. P. 3657/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Icon Constultants (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No 3. Since matter is pending before the adjudicating authority therefore in writ jurisdiction this court cannot examine the factual aspect with regard to quantum of amount to be paid to the EOBI and adjudicating authority is required to decide the same hence petition being not maintainable is hereby dismissed. Adjudicating AuthorityI shall decide the case of the petitioner as referred above within one month. Office shall communicate this order to the concerned quarter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1048 Const. P. 3028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Umair Jam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 Yes The questions in the context are whether the petitioner has any enforceable right to seek direction to respondents to allow him to join 49th Common Training Program 2021, commencing in the ensuing month. And whether the respondents are required to act fairly, in a manner which is not arbitrary and in accordance with the established practice followed by it over a long period in making such deferments to other candidates namely Hamood-ur-Rehman, Taveer Shahoor Rana, Abraiz Ali Abbasi, Ahmed Saeed Manj and Ateeq-Ullah under the prevailing occupational groups and services (Probation, Training, and Seniority) Rules, 1990. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1049 Const. P. 6114/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Wahid Khoso (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1050 Const. P. 6909/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asadullah Shaikh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3521/2021 Asadullah Shaikh and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1920/2023 Asadullah Shaikh and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed in 3 months,Pending
1051 Const. P. 7213/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khurram Faizan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.836-K/2022 Khurram Faizan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1052 Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes alteration in date of Birth Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1053 Const. P. 1734/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Irum & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1054 Cr.Bail 2013/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Abdul Latif Kodrani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1055 Const. P. 221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 ABC (Petitioner) VS ABC (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1056 Const. P. 8756/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Jawed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes the petitioner has assailed the vires of the office order No.42/2018 issued by respondent-Employees Old-age Benefits Institution (`EOBI`), whereby he was declared as Dead wood, consequently, he was forcibly sent on Early Retirement from the service of EOBI on the ground that his further retention in service would be of no benefit for the institution. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.4249/2021 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another,C.A.49/2024 The Chairman Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI), Karachi v. Jawed Qureshi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed
1057 Const. P. 1613/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Laique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1058 Const. P. 688/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Faiz Aslam (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1059 Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 Yes At this juncture, learned AAG contends that there is another judgment i.e. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Punjab Lahore etc. v. Ms. Shamim Usman (Civil Petition No.1097-L of 2020) and extends his no objection that if the matter is referred to the Competent Authority, who shall examine the case of the petitioners alongwith their batch-mates as well seniors within the guidelines of dicta laid down by the apex Court and rules in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 03 months. Needless to mention that any findings of that Committee can be challenged by the petitioners or by any aggrieved person through independent proceedings and not under the contempt proceedings. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners, contends that in another inquiry competent officers opined that the case of Gul Hassan Jatoi (supra) is not applicable to them with regard to promotion, suffice to say that Police Rules are binding upon authorities, however, interpretation of the apex Court and guidelines provided in judgment, particularly paragraphs 56 and 71, shall be examined as afresh and earlier opinion shall not come in the way of promotion. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1060 Cr.J.A 87/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Zamir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUL-21 Yes For the foregoing facts and reasons, we have not found any misreading or non-appreciation of evidence and any illegality or legal or factual infirmity in the impugned judgment so as to justify interference by this Court in recording sentence and conviction to appellant by the trial Court. Hence, instant criminal appeal is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.P.118-K/2021 Zamir v. The State,Crl.A.33-K/2022 Zamir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
1061 Const. P. 4035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Bashir Ahmed Kalwar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-21 Yes Declare the supersession of the petitioner made by the Respondent No.02 / CSB and the competent authority through impugned order dated 06.06.2018 as illegal--Direct the respondents to consider the case of promotion of petitioner in BPS-20, in terms of original reference of December, 2016--when a civil/public servant is recommended for supersession by the Central Selection Board (CSB) and the recommendation of the CSB is approved by the competent authority, what is its effect, and whether supersession is punishment? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.3921/2021 The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and another v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.757-K/2021 The Chairman (FBR) v. Bashir Ahmed Kalwar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1062 Const. P. 8948/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes Member of the Armed Forces--review petition pending before respondent No.1 may be ordered to be decided under the law. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1063 Const. P. 1272/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Asralan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1064 Const. P. 6244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-21 Yes Whether the Petitioner is qualified for the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh? ii) Whether the post of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 in Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh is to be filled by 80% by initial appointment through Sindh Public Service Commission (except contract employees) and 20% by promotion amongst the various categories of teachers having 7 years service in BPS-16? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4278/2021 Aziz ullah v. The Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1065 Const. P. 471/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Nasir Ali Zangejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 Yes Deceased Quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1066 Const. P. 5842/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1067 Const. P. 2966/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Raees Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS The Karachi Dock Labor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-21 Yes enforcement of Board Resolution of Karachi Dock Labor Board Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.541-K/2021 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another,C.A.97-K/2023 Raees Ahmed & others v. Karachi Dock Labour Board through its Chairman Port Trust & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Appeal within 3 months ],Pending
1068 2022 PLD Sindh 131 Const. P. 166/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Fayaz Ali Mastoi (Petitioner) VS Assistant XEN Irrigation Shahdadkot & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 Yes Irrigation Water Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1069 Cr.Bail 150/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ali Murad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1070 Const. P. 6365/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Siraj Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mairajuddin and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Judicial propriety demands verification of such statement as apart from province of Sindh, local councils are also providing education in public sector. Reference can be made to the suo moto case - Miserable condition of schools (2014 SCMR 396). Accordingly, District and Sessions Judges of all Districts of Karachi division shall depute their respective Magistrate(s) to visit all schools under the DMC(s) and submit report with regard to number of students and status of school buildings. Deputy Commissioner(s) shall also join visits. That report shall include video clips and photographs of buildings as well. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1071 Cr.Bail 631/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Noor Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1072 Cr.Bail 25/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Sultan Ahmed Rind and Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-21 Yes PROTECTIVE BAIL Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1073 Const. P. 5860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1074 Const. P. 6903/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ishaq Lashari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.201-K/2022 Muhammad Ishaque Lashari & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1075 Criminal Appeal 45/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2020 Allahdad Waswano (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-JUL-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court(Narcotics Upto 7 Years) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1076 Const. P. 5063/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Gul Ahmed Energy Ltd (Petitioner) VS Court of Commission for Worksmen Comp. & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-21 Yes we decide this petition with direction to the Commission /Authority to frame legal issue with regard to jurisdiction, as stated above, particularly in paragraph-8 of the impugned order, and allow the parties to submit documents, including additional documents if not already filed, or lead evidence and thereafter finally decide the jurisdictional question Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1077 Const. P. 3463/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khalid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1078 Const. P. 3463/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khalid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1079 Const. P. 3463/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khalid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1080 2022 SBLR Sindh 50 Const. P. 830/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sohail and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1112-K/2021 Muhammad Junaid v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Ports & Shipping & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1081 Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-21 Yes the petitioner is an educationist and has been serving in the Public Education Sector in Sindh since 1987. Per learned counsel the Universities and Boards Department, the Government of Sindh, Karachi invited application for the position of Chairman-Board and petitioner was one of the candidates for the aforesaid post-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1082 Const. P. 6192/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.562-K/2021 Roshan Ali Kanasro v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1083 Const. P. 2281/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Juman Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1084 Const. P. 2363/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imtiaz Ali Isani (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1085 Const. P. 4003/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Learned / Hon (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakistan International Airline Company to allow joining period to them till 13.06.2019. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1086 Cr.Bail 212/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Nabi @ Shuti Bhayo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1087 Cr.Bail 237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghazi Katohar and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1088 Const. P. 1042/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 Yes regularization Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.429-K/2021 Muhammad Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1089 Const. P. 3668/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dadan Khan Pirzado and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-22 No contempt Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1090 Cr.Misc. 660/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imran Ali (Applicant) VS SP Jamshoro (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1091 Civil Revision 115/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Ismail & Ors (Applicant) VS Allahdino & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1092 Cr.Bail 2365/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 BASHEER AHMED S/O ABDUL WADOOD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes seeking post-arrest bail in FIR No.665/2021 of PS Ittehad Town, Karachi registered under Section 23(i) A of the Sindh Arms Act, 2013 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1093 Const. P. 964/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Maudood Ahmed Ansari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1094 Criminal Miscelleneous 769/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NOMAN MARWAT S/O KAISAF KHAN (Applicant) VS IVTH ADJ KHI MALIR & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes In principle, the offense under section 489-F PPC is punishable with imprisonment of three years, thus, does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr. P.C; and, the grounds for cancellation of bail are altogether different from the grant of bail; and once pre-arrest bail is confirmed, the exceptional and extraordinary grounds, as well as strong reasons, are required to recall the bail order granted earlier to the accused. The principles enunciated, governing for grant of bail and cancellation whereof has been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme court in the case of Sharif Khan V/S The State and another, 2021 SCMR 87 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1095 Const. P. 723/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sohail Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1096 Const. P. 217/2001 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Agha Nisar Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1097 Const. P. 687/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farina Shahab (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1098 Const. P. 757/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farina Shahab (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1099 Const. P. 2608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Deepak (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1100 Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Out of turn promotion, deputation and OPS Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1101 Civil Revision 165/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Suleman (Applicant) VS Murad Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1102 Const. P. 38/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Administrator Evacuee Trust property & Others (Petitioner) VS Pardeep Kumar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1103 Const. P. 1913/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sindh High Court Employees C.Operative (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1104 Const. P. 3157/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sh. Nenoo Bheel (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes we may observe that pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges; prima-facie there was/is no conviction in his credit, and pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on that score. In our view pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of any charges; and, is violative to the law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon (PLD 2007 SC 35) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1105 R.A (Civil Revision) 267/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Arab & Ors (Applicant) VS Hakeem & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1106 Const. P. 386/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ahmed Nadeem Chohan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ishaque Khan & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1107 M.A. 88/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Iqbal Javed & Others (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1108 Const. P. 1523/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1109 Const. P. 6/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Asif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes "Shifting of SABZI MANDI - MARKET COMMITTEE" Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1110 Cr.Bail 725/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 WAJID ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Bail Before Arrest Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1111 Const. P. 689/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mir Asad Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1112 Const. P. 740/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farina Shahab (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1113 Const. P. 756/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ishaque Khan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1114 Const. P. 114/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: attached case ...... CP No. D- 1236 of 2014 2018 Ghulam Mohammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1115 Const. P. 691/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farah Safdar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1116 Const. P. 750/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Odhu Mal Urf Dileep Kumar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1117 Const. P. 727/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ambreen Zahid (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1118 Const. P. 147/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Manzoor Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-22 No Health Department Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1119 Const. P. 3310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imamdin and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1120 Const. P. 6464/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Bahria Foundation (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1121 Const. P. 1523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Haq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1122 Const. P. 732/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rashid Aman Khan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1123 Const. P. 2150/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalil-ur-Rehman and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1124 Cr.Bail 1357/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD HUMAYUN QADRI S/O GHULAM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes Applicant Muhammad Humayun Qadri has earlier been admitted to ad-interim pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order dated 14.7.2021. Now the matter is fixed for confirmation of pre-arrest bail or otherwise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1125 Const. P. 742/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Izaharul Haq (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1126 Const. P. 1564/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1127 Const. P. 1995/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP NO.D-1995/2016 CP NO.D-2084/2016 CP NO.D-2085/2016 CP NO.D-2120/2016 CP NO.D-2121/2016 CP NO.D-2122/2016 CP NO.D-2345/2016 CP NO.D-2146/2016 CP NO.D-2148/2016 CP NO.D-2157/2016 CP NO.D-2269/2016 CP NO.D-2270/2016 CP NO.D-2302/2016 CP NO.D-2316/2016 CP NO.D-2355/2016 CP NO.D-2440/2016 CP NO.D-2606/2016 CP NO.D-2690/2016 CP NO.D-2729/2016 CP NO.D-2774/2016 CP NO.D-2803/2016 CP NO.D-2834/2016 CP NO.D-2835/2016 CP NO.D-2836/2016 CP NO.D-2837/2016 CP NO.D-2853/2016 CP NO.D-2909/2016 CP NO.D-3327/2016 CP NO.D-3521/2016 CP NO.D-3527/2016 CP NO.D-3791/2016 CP NO.D-3825/2016 CP NO.D-3870/2016 CP NO.D-4060/2016 CP NO.D-4219/2016 CP NO.D-5096/2016 CP NO.D-5121/2016 CP NO.D-5637/2016 CP NO.D-6680/2016 CP NO.D-6681/2016 CP NO.D-6996/2016 CP NO.D-803/2017 CP NO.D-2329/2016 CP NO.D-2337/2016 CP NO.D-2649/2016 CP NO.D-2792/2016 CP NO.D-4311/2016 CP NO.D-4369/2016 CP NO.D-4587/2016 CP NO.D-5636/2021 CP NO.D-7212/2016 CP NO.D-994/2017 2016 M/s Dairy Land (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes It is also, prima facie, evident that vires of the Act 2016 has not been challenged, but the notification, so issued under such Act, impugned. A challenge to application of notification only without assailing the vires of the Act under which the notification has been issued, legally, cant be made, particularly where things notified are with reference to the Act itself. On this count, too, the instant petition (s) are not tenable in law. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed with no order as to cost. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1128 Const. P. 202/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Imran and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1129 Const. P. 914/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Shahzad ali & Another (Petitioner) VS NAB & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1130 Const. P. 1413/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Hussain Bux and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1131 Const. P. 1487/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Hussain Shahani and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1132 Const. P. 2269/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Gadoon Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.154/2022 M/s Gadoon Textile Mills Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan, through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development , Govt of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1133 Const. P. 7322/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1134 Const. P. 4279/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muzaffar Ali Talpur and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.640-K/2022 The Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Ministry of Climate Change. v. Muzaffar Ali Talpur & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1135 Const. P. 323/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Khawaja Yasir Uddin (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1136 Const. P. 742/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Adeel Haider and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1137 Const. P. 917/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Hameed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1138 Const. P. 6750/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Huzaifa Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.717-K/2022 Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Huzaifa Hanif Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1139 Const. P. 5062/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Engr: Muharram Khan and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-22 Yes whether the private respondents are undertaking the work of professional engineers in terms of the Pakistan Engineering Council Act, 1975, being Diploma Holders. And whether their case falls within the ambit of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maula Bux Shaikh supra or otherwise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1140 M.A. 32/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Hajab & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1141 Const. P. 1312/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1142 Const. P. 146/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Zafar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1143 Const. P. 2085/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Employees Federation of Pakistan and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.345-K/2020 Partab Rai v. Federation of Pakistan,C.P.L.A.35/2022 Phoenix Armour (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Employers Federation of Pakistan, Karachi and others,C.P.76/2022 Employers Federation of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Pending ,Pending
1144 M.A. 44/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS mavji & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1145 Const. P. 7433/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rubina Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1146 Const. P. 5229/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Karachi Tax Bar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes whether a probationer has the capability and potential to make a satisfactory career in the organization, and whether or not the organization/employer will have any benefit of his services. We are of the view that the period of probation provides equal opportunity to the employer and employee to decide whether they would like to continue with the engagement or not. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1147 Const. P. 659/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Pervez Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1148 M.A. 40/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Punhoon & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1149 Const. P. 5675/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Tasleem Mehmood and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1150 Const. P. 5672/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Waseem Siddiqui and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1151 Const. P. 806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1152 Const. P. 5636/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Asad Apparel (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1153 Const. P. 2148/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s OMI Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1154 Const. P. 3521/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 ENI Pakistan Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1155 Const. P. 6583/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Azhar Ali Farooqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain C.P.2368/2022 The Secretary, Establishment/Cabinet Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad v. Azhar Ali Farooqi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1156 Const. P. 980/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Urs and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1157 M.A. 37/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Taro & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1158 Const. P. 325/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1159 Const. P. 5500/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Waris khaki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1160 Const. P. 4291/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Younus and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.542-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Muhammad Younis & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1161 Const. P. 214/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mateen-ud-din Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1162 Const. P. 3024/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Qarora Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.403-K/2022 Dr. Qararo Shah v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of National Health Services & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1163 Const. P. 912/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Zahid Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1164 Const. P. 6788/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Zafar Iqbal Shams (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1165 Const. P. 7272/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Union Properites (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1166 Const. P. 6571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Masood Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1167 Const. P. 610/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Ameena (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1168 Criminal Miscelleneous 137/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Meer Hassan Jakhrani (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Muhammadpur Odho and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1169 Const. P. 398/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Imran Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1170 Const. P. 737/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hakim Ali (Petitioner) VS D.J Dadu & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1171 Const. P. 641/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Amreen Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Badin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1172 Const. P. 376/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zulekhan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1173 Const. P. 100/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Din Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1174 Const. P. 592/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 M.Yousif & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1175 Const. P. 395/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Wazeer Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1176 Const. P. 332/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1177 Const. P. 565/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1178 Const. P. 393/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Kamran Ali (Petitioner) VS A.D.J Sehwan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1179 Const. P. 492/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Jabbar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1180 Const. P. 2/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Syeda & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1181 Const. P. 489/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khairun-Nisa & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1182 Const. P. 272/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Latif and Others (Petitioner) VS NBP and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1183 Const. P. 622/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Sonia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1184 Const. P. 420/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Rasheeda & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1185 Const. P. 339/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Ghulam Kubra another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1186 Const. P. 579/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Faheemuddin Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.524-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Faheemuddin & others,C.P.2033/2023 Noor Ahmed Khuharo and others v. Faheemuddin Memon and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1187 Const. P. 1373/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Khalid Rasheed (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.942/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Khalid Rasheed and another,C.A.14/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Khalid Rasheed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1188 Const. P. 6397/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mohsin Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1189 Const. P. 156/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ajeet Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1190 Const. P. 3707/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Shereen Javed (Petitioner) VS The State Thru Governor and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1191 Const. P. 658/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Khalil Ahmed Khooharo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
1192 Const. P. 7082/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ahmed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.539-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Zeeshan Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1193 II.A. 33/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Akhtar & Ors. (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1194 Const. P. 7952/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Rizwan Rajab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1195 Const. P. 196/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mst Balqees Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Qubo Saeed Khan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1196 R.A (Civil Revision) 60/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Irfan (Applicant) VS Qadeer Muhammad (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1197 II.A. 3/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ramzan (Appellant) VS Town Committee Khipro (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.424-K/2020 Sartaj Ahmed Malgani & another v. Ali Hassan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1198 Const. P. 540/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shamsuddin Channa (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4136/2022 General Manager (HR-A), Utility Stores Corporation Pvt Ltd Islamabad and others v. Shamsuddin Channa and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1199 Const. P. 6164/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Afaq Ahmed Qureshie (Petitioner) VS The Chief Secretariat, Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.518-K/2023 Afaq Ahmed Qureshi v. The Chief Secretary, Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1200 Const. P. 4598/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NBP Officers Welfare Association and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.790/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President Karachi and another v. NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through Senior Vice President others,C.P.L.A.1177/2023 NBP Officers Welfare Association, Karachi through its Vice President and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1201 Const. P. 576/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Nazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1202 Const. P. 659/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Aijaz Hussain Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
1203 Const. P. 141/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Yasmeen Nagori (Petitioner) VS Dy.Director (RCMHC) & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1204 Const. P. 6781/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azher Saeed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Administrator of Abandones Properties & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1205 Const. P. 319/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Rozina & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1206 Criminal Miscelleneous 597/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SIKANDAR ALI (Applicant) VS A.D.J II JUSTICE OF PEACE JAMSHORO & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1207 Criminal Miscelleneous 656/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dost Muhammad (Applicant) VS C.J and J.M-III Sanghar and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1208 Const. P. 691/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sharafuddin Junejo (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1209 Const. P. 252/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Najma & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1210 Const. P. 13/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Chatro (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.640/2021 Muhammad Nawaz v. Station House Officer, Police Station Section-A Kandhkot, City (Sindh), etc Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1211 Cr.Acq.A. 174/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Noman Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1212 Const. P. 2379/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Karam Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1213 R.A (Civil Revision) 61/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Nabi Bux and another (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ahmed Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1214 Const. P. 2747/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1215 Const. P. 1171/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Muhammad Javaid Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1216 Criminal Appeal 123/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mumtaz Hussain (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1217 Const. P. 771/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Mayam & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1218 Cr.Acq.A. 3/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 SYED HAJI NIAZ MUHAMMAD SHAH (Appellant) VS ABDUL QADIR & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1219 Const. P. 2514/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Qutabuddin (Petitioner) VS College of Physician & Surgeons and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1220 R.A (Civil Revision) 32/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muharam Khan (Applicant) VS Luqman & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1221 Const. P. 1837/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CPD 3062 of 2022, CPD 3063 of 2022, CPD 3261 of 2022 and CPD 3317 of 2022 2022 Dr. Allauddin Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1222 Const. P. 3946/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Moosa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1223 Const. P. 594/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Laiba (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1224 M.A. 29/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dildar. (Appellant) VS Faizan Hanif Soomro & Another. (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1225 Const. P. 554/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Faiza (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1226 Const. P. 486/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Imam Bux & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.69-K/2023 Abdul Aziz Lakhani v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Revenue Division Government of Pakistan Islamabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 04-Jun-24)
1227 Const. P. 654/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dr. Syed Abid Iaman Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Shoukat Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1228 R.A (Civil Revision) 72/2001 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2001 Medical Superintendent P.M.C. (Applicant) VS Baksh Ali Jamali (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.4081/2022 Baksh Ali v. Medical Superintendent, Peoples Medical College, Nawabshah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1229 Const. P. 3191/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Shaista Shoukat Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1230 Const. P. 3652/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sabir Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1231 Const. P. 462/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Mutafa (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1232 Const. P. 5466/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Hujjan Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1233 Const. P. 4263/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mala Kumari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1234 Const. P. 687/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Rizwan Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4273/2022 Rizwan Khan v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1235 Const. P. 1901/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Qalandar Bux & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.454-K/2023 Ghulam Mustaffa & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ]
1236 Const. P. 716/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Asif Ali Qambrani (Petitioner) VS Abdul Latif & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1237 Const. P. 1364/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Yasmeen & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1238 Const. P. 680/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Khalid Hussain Agro (Petitioner) VS Mumtaz Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
1239 Const. P. 59/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Noor Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1240 Const. P. 7069/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Manthar Ali and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.526-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Manthar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1241 Const. P. 4395/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s IFFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS The Registrar Trade Union and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1242 Const. P. 330/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Maryam & Another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1243 Const. P. 377/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Rabia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1244 Const. P. 559/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Shahbana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1245 Const. P. 651/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zareena (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Jamshoro & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1246 Const. P. 1140/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ghulam Sakina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1247 Const. P. 5703/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ali Haider and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1248 Const. P. 2218/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Zeba Shahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1249 Const. P. 3072/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Qadir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1250 Const. P. 2569/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mahmood ul Hassan (Petitioner) VS FBR & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1251 Const. P. 3161/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mir Manzoor Hussain Talpur (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1252 Cr.Rev 32/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 NARESH KUMAR (Applicant) VS GUL HASSAN & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1253 Criminal Miscelleneous 201/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 QAMAR ZAMAN SAMEJO (Applicant) VS S.S.P DADU & OTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1254 Criminal Appeal 158/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A S 157 of 2022 2022 IRFAN ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-APR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1255 2023 SBLR Sindh 2039 Cr.Bail 214/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Qasim (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1256 Const. P. 97/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Naseeban & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1257 Const. P. 1271/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Naimatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others\ (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1013-K/2023 Naimatullah v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1258 Cr.Rev 281/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MST. RUBINA W/O ABDUL WAHID (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD SALAHUDDIN & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1259 Criminal Miscelleneous 648/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD NOMAN S/O M. FEROZE (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL MALIR KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1260 Cr.Rev 230/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD JAVED RAJPUT & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS PARVEZ HAROON MADRASWALA (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1261 Cr.Tran 89/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE KHAN S/O SHER KHAN (Appellant) VS SHEIKH AHMED S/O ABDUL SATTAR (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1262 Const. P. 6365/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Naimatullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 Yes It is a settled proposition of law that the Government is entitled to make rules in the interest of expediency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee that has to determine the eligibility criteria for promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision-making of the Government the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted and no vested right of a Government employee is involved in the matter of promotion or the rules determining his/her eligibility or fitness. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1263 Const. P. 5270/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Ejaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-FEB-24 Yes The perusal of Article 199 (b)(ii) of the Constitution shows that a person performing duties in connection with affairs of the Province could be required to show under what authority he is holding a particular public office and for that purpose, the petitioner therein may not be required to be an aggrieved person, however, in the instant matter the directions sought by the petitioner were not merely confined to the afore-referred aspect of the matter rather the same include the issuance of directions like the Writ of Mandamus and prohibition against the respondent No.5 requiring him to show his fitness to hold the promotion post in BS-21 without fulfilling the criteria as outlined in the recruitment rules as the matter of appointment of the post of Inspector General of Prison Sindh (BPS-21) is governed under the Recruitment Rules Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1264 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1355/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 1356 to 1447 of 2023, 1546 to 1557 of 2023 2023 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. JW SEZ (Pvt) Ltd., Lahore (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-24 Yes Transactional value; identical goods method; Section 25(5) read with Rule 107 of Customs Rules 2001; at or about the same time; 90 days period Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1265 Cr.Acq.A. 73/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ YAHYA (Appellant) VS XXIITH CJ & JM KARACHI EAST & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1266 Criminal Miscelleneous 325/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL AZIZ S/O ISLAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1267 Cr.Bail 1376/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 DIN MUHAMMAD S/O PARWAR DINO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1268 Cr.Rev 212/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MST. FARAH NEELOFAR (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ALI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1269 Cr.Rev 74/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 J.S BANK LTD TH MOIZUDDIN KHAN (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD MALIK & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1270 Election Appeal 232/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Aftab uddin Baqai S/o Muhammad Aminuddin (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1271 Cr.Bail 1666/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RAHEEMDUDDIN S/O ATTA MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1272 Cr.Bail 2440/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED MUHAMMAD MEHDI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1273 Election Appeal 176/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mohsin Nisar S/o Nisar Ahmed (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1274 Election Appeal 148/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arshad Abdullah Vohra S/o Abdullah (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1275 Cr.Bail 1576/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SIDDIQ S/O AHMEDULLAH & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1276 Cr.Bail 1263/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHID ALI S/O GHULAM SHABEER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1277 Cr.Bail 680/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD AMIN CHAPAL & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1278 Const. P. 2749/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P Nos. D-4747, 4998, 4999, 5433, 5452, 6427 & 6518 of 2021 2021 Karam Ceamics Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1279 Cr.Bail 1720/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JUMMA KHAN @ GOONGA S/O ABDUL GHANI (Applicant) VS THE STAE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1280 Cr.Bail 961/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JALIL S/O MUHAMMAD ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1281 Cr.Bail 734/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ATEEQ AHMED KHAN S/O SHAMIM AHMED KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1282 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1581/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 1582 to 1591 of 2023 2023 Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Kar. (Applicant) VS M/s. Haroon Brothers and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1283 Cr.Bail 1529/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 NOOR DAD S/O SABZ ALI KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1284 Cr.Bail 1582/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ARIF ALI S/O ABDUL MAJEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1285 Cr.Rev 119/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MUHAMMAD NAVEED S/O NASEEMUDDIN (Applicant) VS KAMRAN SHAMIM & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.28-K/2021 Ali Sher & others v. Dhani Bux & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1286 Criminal Miscelleneous 214/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAUKAT ALI SOOMRO & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1287 Const. P. 6222/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-24 Yes firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion & Transfer) Rules, 1973 provides appointment of deputation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1288 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 47/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Driector, Dirc. Gen. Intell. & Invt. (Cus) Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Internatioal Impex, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 Yes Penalty on Custom Agent; cannot be sustained in undervaluation by Importer in absence of any material to that effect. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1289 Criminal Miscelleneous 441/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD OWAIS ALAM (Applicant) VS IQBAL RASHEED & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1290 Cr.Bail 2024/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 NASIR DURRANI S/O WAHID DURRANI (Applicant) VS VIITH ADJ KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1291 Cr.Bail 2583/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHID HUSSAIN S/O IRSHAD HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1292 Const. P. 1062/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Asma Sultana Kamran Wd/o Syed Kamran Maqbool (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ambreen Maqbool and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1293 Cr.Bail 2807/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 FIDA HUSSAIN S/O GHULAM QADIR KATHIO & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1294 Cr.Bail 1727/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD AYUB S/O JEHAN KHAN & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-AUG-23 No Once the Supreme Court has held in categorical terms that grant of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of Section 497 Cr.P.C. shall be a rule and refusal shall be an exception then, the subordinate Courts should follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by the Supreme Court under Article 189 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 has binding effect on all subordinate Courts. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1295 Election Appeal 258/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Advocate Syed Arsalan Hussain (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1296 Const. P. 938/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Erum D/o Jawaid Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS The Province of SIndh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1297 Cr.Bail 475/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD IRFAN S/O MUHAMMAD IDREES (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1298 Cr.Rev 95/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ABBASS RAZA S/O M. TASLEEM ZAMAN (Applicant) VS AMBREEN ZEHRA D/O MUHAMMAD ZAFAR & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1032-K/2023 Muhammad Yousuf Bhindi v. M/s. A.G.E. & Sons (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1299 Criminal Miscelleneous 555/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED ANIS HYDER (Applicant) VS SSP KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1300 Election Appeal 242/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Kausar Fatima Zaid Advocate (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1301 Cr.Bail 1298/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MAHESH KUMAR S/O SARWANAND (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1302 Election Appeal 117/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Inayatullah Marfani (Appellant) VS The RO PS-98 Khi East and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1303 Cr.Bail 1810/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RAZIKA W/O IZZAT KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1304 Criminal Miscelleneous 762/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMAMD HAFEEZ S/O MUHAMAMD ASLAM KHAN (Applicant) VS SSP MALIR KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1305 Cr.Bail 1755/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MATLOOB AHMED S/O ABDUL SAMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1306 R.A (Civil Revision) 132/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Faisal Lakhani Thr. Shafqat Ahmed (Applicant) VS The Learned XIIth ADJ, Karachi East & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1307 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1747/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS Muhammad Nabi Jan S/o Abdul Jan & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1308 Const. P. 5569/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Zahid Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1309 Cr.Bail 1735/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAHZAIB UMER S/O MUHAMMAD UMER & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1310 Cr.Bail 1749/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 IRFAN S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1311 Cr.Bail 1657/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 YOUSUF KHAN S/O KHUDAIDAD KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1312 Cr.Bail 1291/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD AZAM S/O DILAWAR KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1313 Criminal Miscelleneous 483/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sht.Heer BAI (Applicant) VS SSP Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1314 Const. P. 746/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Salik & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1315 Cr.Bail 422/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shaman alias Shamoo Phulpoto (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-JUL-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1316 Const. P. 4713/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1317 Cr.Bail 155/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Qazafi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-AUG-24 No there appeared a remarkable difference between the gross weight i.e. 2200, and the net weight of charas which weighs 2194 grams; the applicant has been shown to have been arrested from a car alongwith shopper bag containing purported chars; whereas the car movement record/tracker report with the narration that the car does not show presence of car at the alleged place of incident; in all cases about Narcotics, modern device is required to be used in future cases without fail in terms of the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Zahid Sarfaraz Gill. Bail granted Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1318 Const. P. 623/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali Sher and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1319 Const. P. 1784/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Nadeem Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1320 Const. P. 682/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Manmohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1321 Const. P. 769/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Rashid Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1322 Const. P. 703/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Neemchand (Petitioner) VS Nangodhar @ Loung & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1323 Const. P. 1060/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Jagesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1324 Criminal Miscelleneous 472/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Yar (Applicant) VS The state & anothe (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1325 Const. P. 183/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Marvi (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1326 Cr.Bail 173/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Narain @ Narain Das & others (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1327 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 151/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Bawany Metals Ltd. (Applicant) VS Additional Collector of Customs (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-24 Yes Exemption on import of copper cathode and Aluminium Ingots under SRO 565(I)/2006 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1328 Const. P. 174/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Bashir Ahmed Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1329 Const. P. 491/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Imtiaz Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 Yes It appears from the record that petitioners are calling in question the Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by the Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachment Taluka Hussain Bux Mari on the premise that the petitioners have titled documents in their favor issued by the Revenue authorities through registered sale deed and such Khatas are mutated in their names. If this is a position of the case, the issue involved in the proceedings can be resolved by the Anti Encroachment and/or competent Court of law as both the parties claim and counterclaim on the subject property. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1330 Const. P. 458/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Liaquat Ali Arain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1331 Cr.Rev 269/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/S MAPLE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD & ORS (Applicant) VS LEARNED CHAIRMAIN DRUG COURT KHI (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-24 Yes It is well settled that the report of an expert cannot be used as evidence without taking it on record and exhibiting it to provide an opportunity for cross-examination. The Cr.P.C. allows certain expert reports to be admitted in evidence without calling the expert as a witness. This is to save time and speed up trials. However, the court may still summon and examine the expert if necessary. The admissibility of test reports has been questioned. However, the Qanun-e Shahadat Order (QSO) and Cr.P.C. should be interpreted progressively to give more space to modern forensic science. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1332 Cr.Bail 118/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Khalique Sahito & another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-24 No the Supreme Court is clear and held in the case of Rana Abdul Khaliq Vs. State (2019 SCMR 1129), that the accused seeking judicial protection is required to reasonably demonstrate that his/her intended arrest is calculated to humiliate him with taints of mala fide. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1333 Const. P. 6194/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Anwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-24 Yes Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the August court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the August Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1334 Const. P. 380/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali Hassan Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
1335 Const. P. 873/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Muhammad Yousif Joyo & Ors (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1336 Const. P. 354/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes There is no cavil to the proposition that this court has no jurisdiction to take suo moto action under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court of Pakistan held in the case of Divisional Superintendent, Postal Services, Gujranwala and another vs. Muhammad Arif Butt (2021 SCMR 1033) that any government servant who misappropriates public money, regardless of the amount, has breached the trust and confidence placed in them. This is considered dishonesty and misconduct, and such an employee has no place in government service. It is well-settled that based on sheer technicalities, the persons cannot be exonerated from serious charges of misappropriation and fraud, if any, and that needs proper inquiry and investigation by the investigating agency to unearth the truth for placing the same before the competent Court of law. Therefore the titled Constitution Petitions are maintainable on various accounts, Articles 9 (security of person), 14 (inviolability of dignity of man), 24 (protection of property rights), and 25 (equality of citizens) of the Constitution and affecting the public at large because unlawful diversion of State resources from public development projects to private use leads to poverty, declining quality of life and injustice, as such these petitions can be heard and decided on merits. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1337 Cr.Bail 775/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 HARIS MAQSOOD S/O MAQSOOD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-24 Yes In a more recent case; namely, Criminal Bail Application No.1010/2014 (Muhammad Shafique V/S The State) decided on 11.07.2014, it has been observed that the terms ???arms??? and ???firearms??? have been separately and distinctly defined in Clauses (c) and (d), respectively, of Section 2 of the Act; amongst many other articles designed as weapons of offense or defense, ???pistols??? are included in the definition of ???arms??? in Clause (c) ibid and not in the definition of ???firearms??? defined in Clause (d) ibid ; the punishment and penalty for acquiring, possessing, carrying, or controlling any ???firearm??? or ammunition in infringement of Section 3 of the Act, is provided in Section 23(1)(a) of the Act, which is imprisonment for a term that may extend to 14 years and with fine; and, whereas, the punishment for possessing ???arms??? or ammunition, licensed or unlicensed, with the aim to use them for any unlawful purpose etc., is provided in Section 24 of the Act, which is imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years and with a fine. This court held in the aforementioned case that the above clearly shows the intention of the legislature that not only are the offenses to ???arms??? and those relating to ???firearms??? to be dealt with separately as provided in the Act; but since punishments having different terms in respect of ???arms??? and ???firearms??? have been specified separately in the Act, punishment under Section 23(1)(a) of the Act cannot be awarded for an offense committed under Section 24 of the Act, and vice versa. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1338 Const. P. 1490/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Haque Nawaz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1339 Const. P. 4971/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Sara & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-24 Yes We are not in agreement with him on the premise that the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act of 1939 recognizes the age of 16 as the legal age for marriage. Section 13 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 reads as under:- (13. Amendment of the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939).In the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939) in section 2:- 1. After clause (ii) the following new clause (ii-a) shall be inserted, namely:- ???(ii-a) that the husband has taken any additional wife??? (b) In clause (vii), for the word ???fifteen??? the word ???sixteen??? shall be substituted). 8. According to Mulla's Principles of Muhammadan Law, a marriage of a minor performed by her father or grandfather is valid unless she repudiates it before 18. Even a marriage arranged by other guardians is valid unless the minor repudiates it on attaining puberty. At this juncture, it would be significant to refer to the case of Mauj Ali v. Syed Safder Hussain (1970 SCMR 437), wherein the Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929 was an issue while deciding such controversy by the Supreme Court. 9. The competent court of law is required to see the validity of the marriage carefully, considering the family's honor. If the information is found to be false, the family should not be unnecessarily harmed. However, as petitioner No.1 has made a statement before the court, no further action is required against the couple, and they should be protected, for the simple reason that adults have the right to marry whomever they choose, regardless of caste or religion. Parents may disapprove but cannot resort to threats or violence. Police authorities must protect such couples and prosecute those who harass or threaten them. However, this does not affect the legal rights of the couple or any underage issue before the court, if any, is pending. 10. The police official present in court must submit a summary report to the magistrate, who will decide the case based on the petitioner's statement. The police should protect the couple if they seek help. No further action should be taken against the couple, and their family should not harass them. 11. In view of the statement of the parties, the private respondents are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs.500,000/- each before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose 12. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1340 Const. P. 519/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khadim Hussain Bhanbhro & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1341 Const. P. 543/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Wajahat Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1342 Criminal Miscelleneous 216/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Syed Shahzad Ali Shah (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1343 Criminal Miscelleneous 1157/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 THE STATE / ANF (Applicant) VS IBRAHIM S/O ABDUL AZEEM (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1344 Const. P. 470/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hidayatullah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1345 Cr.Bail 2574/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ARSHAN S/O MUHAMMAD NASIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUL-24 Yes It is a well-settled principle that in a rape case, the solitary statement of the survivor victim is sufficient to form a tentative opinion. Upon a tentative assessment, and by looking into the ordeal of the victim and her family I am not inclined to endorse the viewpoint of the applicant at this stage for the simple reason that bail before arrest is meant to protect innocent citizens who have been involved in heinous offenses with mala fide and ulterior motives, however in the present case no such ground existed in favor of the applicant to show that there was a malafide intention or ulterior motive on the part of the complainant/victim to book the applicant in the rape case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1346 Const. P. 721/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Yaqoob Anjum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1347 Const. P. 258/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muhammad Sajid ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1348 Const. P. 1004/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1349 Criminal Appeal 194/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ashfaque & others (Appellant) VS Wali Muhammad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-24 No The criminal complaint is governed by the scheme of the Criminal Procedure Code; and section 345 Cr.P.C. is applicable and this is the reason that offense related to the property, which being of civil nature, is compoundable; therefore, offenses in terms of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 are compoundable and High Court can entertain the request of the complainant to compromise the matter with the appellants, at the appellate stage, as section 9 of the Act, 2005 provides that unless provided in the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 the provisions contained under the scheme of Criminal Procedure Code shall apply to all the proceedings under the Act. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1350 Const. P. 91/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Hyder (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1351 Const. P. 1420/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mst Shabana kharal & Others (Petitioner) VS Akhtar Hussain & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
1352 Const. P. 1073/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mohammad Kamil (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1353 Const. P. 473/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Naeem Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1354 Const. P. 521/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mushtaque Ali Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1355 Const. P. 106/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Yaseen Ahmed Khaki (Petitioner) VS Fed Of Pak & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1356 Cr.Bail 1376/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 IMTIAZ S/O MEHBOOB ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes Primarily, to constitute an offense under the aforesaid Section, the prosecution is not only required to prove the possession but also to establish the knowledge about the property to be stolen. In the present case, the prosecution has presented the case to the extent that the subject vehicles were stolen and involved in the subject FIRs under Section 381-A PPC and came into possession of the applicants, which were later on recovered from their possession, be that as it may, if the aforesaid section is supposed to be applied, the maximum punishment provided under the statute for the offense is seven years however under Section 411 PPC is three years, which provides dishonestly receiving stolen property and the same does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. It is settled law that grant of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory clause is a rule and refusal is an exception. The liberty of a person is a precious right which cannot be taken away without exceptional foundations. So far as the applicability of sections 381-A PPC and 411 PPC, the trial Court has to determine, if the prosecution brings any cogent material to connect the applicant with the alleged crime, as the issue of confession before police and subsequent recovery has already been discussed in the preceding paragraph. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1357 Const. P. 886/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mumtaz Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1358 Const. P. 6009/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jamil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-24 Yes The main issue involved in the present proceedings is about encashing LPR after retirement. The rules state that LPR must be applied for before retirement. The petitioner retired on 26 October 2016 and applied for LPR encashment later in the year 2002 after 8 years. The petitioner cited cases of his colleagues where the department allowed LPR enchament post-retirement, after a considerable period, when confronted with this position to the respondents, however, this fat was admitted by the department???s representative present I court and sought remittance of this case to the competent authority of the department concerned. 7. Both parties after arguing the matter at some length agreed to dispose of the case, directing the Chief Secretary Sindh who shall constitute a committee headed by him and co-opted by Secretary Finance, Secretary School Education Department, government of Sindh assisted by Regulation wing S&GAD to address the disparity issue and decide the matter, including the petitioner???s requests as made in the memo of the petition within one month after providing meaningful hearing to the parties. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1359 Const. P. 484/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Amjad Ali Gabol & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1360 Cr.Rev 271/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 BASHEER AHMED SODHAR S/O BAKSHAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-24 Yes Coming to the main issue, the offenses under the Sindh Public Property (Removal of Encroachment) Act, 2010, are cognizable. This means that the police have the authority to arrest the accused without a warrant and investigate the case further, which provision of the law ought to have been invoked by the Police, however, they rather preferred to invoke the jurisdiction of ATC on the purported plea that revenue officials were deterred from their duties with terror charges, but it is yet to be determined by the court whether sections 6, 7, and 8 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 were/are attracted or otherwise as the contents of F.I.R, prima facie show the allegations of general nature as such these offenses of PPC could be tried by the ordinary/regular court rather than the special court, in terms of the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Hussain case, just on the plea of Mukhtiarkar and Police to the effect that injury was caused to them; however, the police report lacks a medical certificate required to charge the accused under section 337-A (i) PPC. Besides it is unclear whether the official intended to remove encroachment from public or private land. A regular court should determine this aspect of the case after framing the charge, and transfer the case if necessary under the law for the reason that Section 23 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 allows for the transfer of a case from an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) to an ordinary court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1361 Const. P. 736/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Saeed Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1362 Const. P. 203/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ayaz Ali Mughal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1363 Criminal Appeal 176/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Irshad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 23-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1364 Const. P. 1052/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sandhi Kumari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1365 Const. P. 667/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ubedullah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1366 Const. P. 48/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Asadullah jamro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1367 Const. P. 428/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Illahi Bux Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1368 Const. P. 554/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Halar Atteque-ur-Rehman Bullo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1369 Const. P. 835/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Manzoor Ahmed Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 No Whether a Cooperative Society is subject to a High Courts Constitutional Jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
1370 Const. P. 497/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hafeezullah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1371 Const. P. 712/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sameer Raheel (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1372 Const. P. 567/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Nawaz & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1373 Const. P. 587/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Syed Sikandar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1374 Const. P. 588/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Shah Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1375 M.A. 11/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Farhan Yasir Danwar (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1376 Cr.Bail 164/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Zeeshan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-OCT-24 Yes The law on bail is now well settled. In cases where the offense falls outside the non-prohibitory clause of section 497(1) of Cr.P.C., bail is to be granted as a matter of course, and rejection of the same is an exception. Where, however, an offense falls within the prohibitory clause, bail can only be granted if the court concludes that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offense or where an accused makes out a case of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused or in case the accused is under the age of 16 years or is sick or infirm. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1377 Const. P. 1336/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Adil Miskeen larik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1378 Const. P. 381/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad hayat & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1379 Const. P. 522/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali BUx & Others (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1380 Cr.Bail 890/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 HABIBULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes There is another aspect of the case the applicant claims to be a juvenile born on 01.01.2009 and is about 15 years old as per his birth certificate duly issued by the NADRA, such certificate is available in the police file/ file of this Court (page 39) in such a scenario, again the Supreme Court in the case of Khawar Kayani Vs. The State (PLD 2022 SC 551) has come to rescue the person incarcerated in jail by interpreting Section 6(5) of the Juvenile Justice System Act, 2018. The question of whether the case of the applicant, being a child as disclosed by the investigating officer in the charge sheet, falls within the exception contained in section 83 P.P.C., for ease of reference, is hereby reproduced infra:- ???Act of a child above [ten] and under [fourteen] of immature understanding.- Nothing is an offense which is done by a child above [ten] years of age and under [fourteen], who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion.??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1381 Cr.Bail 646/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 TALHA SAMOO S/O GHULAM NABI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-24 Yes In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception, then, the subordinate Courts should follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by this Court under Article 203 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is binding on all subordinate Courts. My view is supported by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of The State v. Syed Qaim Ali Shah (1992 SCMR 2192) and the famous case of Khan Asfandyar Wali and others v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC 607). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1382 Const. P. 398/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1383 Const. P. 539/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali Madad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1384 Const. P. 563/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zikram Rizvi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1385 Const. P. 550/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Yasin Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1386 Const. P. 1494/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Piyaral maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1387 Criminal Miscelleneous 520/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Fida Hussain (Applicant) VS SSP Tharparkar & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-24 Yes Before parting with this order it is directed that the Police officials shall protect Mst. Sain and ensure no harm is caused to her by either party and if any harassment is caused to her by any of the parties the police shall act swiftly. 5. In view of the statement of the alleged detenee, no case of illegal detention is made out and the purpose of filing the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 491 Cr. P.C. has been served; therefore, the same stands disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1388 Const. P. 802/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1389 Const. P. 4667/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-24 Yes Primarily, the police force is a disciplined force; it shoulders the great responsibility of maintaining law and order and public order in the society; that people repose great faith and confidence in it; that it must be worthy of that confidence; that in recent times, the image of the police force is tarnished and instances of police personnel behaving in a wayward manner by misusing power are in Public domain and are a matter of concern. This factual position is also a cause of great concern these days in our Country as well. On numerous occasions, we come across the involvement of Police personnel in routine as well as heinous crimes, and even if they are apprehended, are let off by the Courts due to faulty and supportive investigation by their brethren by extending the benefit of the doubt. Taking guidance from these observations, it is observed that this must stop and Courts are also required to play their part and let this issue be decided by the Executive / Appointing Authority which in all fairness is in a much better position to ascertain facts and the relevant ground realities. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1390 Const. P. 315/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Sadaf Naz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1391 Const. P. 1420/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Imran Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1392 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 65/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHEHZAD ALI S/O SYED ABBASS ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-24 No Quantum of punishment is an independent aspect of Criminal Administration of Justice which, too, requires to be done keeping the concept of punishment in view. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1393 Const. P. 654/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Raza Arain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1394 Const. P. 452/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Naeemuddin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes The overlap between the jurisdiction of this Court on its Original Civil Side and under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 and the manner in which a Court should act in terms of the judicial propriety as clarified by the Supreme Court of Pakistan where both jurisdictions are invoked. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
1395 Const. P. 3550/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS NAB & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1396 Const. P. 88/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ishaque Ahmed Jagirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1397 Const. P. 813/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shoukat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Secretary Food Dept & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1398 Const. P. 2105/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Jamil Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1399 Const. P. 674/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muzafar Ali Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1400 Const. P. 475/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Qayoom & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1401 Const. P. 44/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mustaqeem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1402 Const. P. 375/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abdul Qadir Gabol (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1403 Cr.Bail 111/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ghulam Nabi @ Gullam (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1404 Const. P. 479/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shahnawaz Khand & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1405 Const. P. 1691/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Ali Jan Panhwar (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1406 Const. P. 645/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Sarwar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1407 Const. P. 2415/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 IDBP Retired Officers Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1386/2021 IDBP retired Officer, Welfare Association (Regd.) through its General Secretary, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Finance Division (Internal Finance Wing) Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
1408 Const. P. 3249/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1409 Const. P. 1608/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Nizamuddin Kolachi V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Petitioner) VS V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-AUG-19 Yes whether the Petitioner can challenge his show cause notice, non- inclusion of his name in Upper School Course in a Constitution Petition Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1410 Const. P. 77/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.675-K/2018 M/s Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Abdul Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1411 Const. P. 4806/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Wasim Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and 03 others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-APR-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1412 2018 SBLR Sindh 682 Const. P. 2991/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ali Asghar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.441-K/2017 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others,C.A.62-K/2018 Sindh Madaressatul Islam University (SMIU) v. Ali Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1413 2019 PLC Lab. 121 Const. P. 1885/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s CIM Shipping Inc (Petitioner) VS Tousif Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1414 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-21 No recruitment process of Head Master/Head Mistress in BPS-17 and their participation in SPSC. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1415 2019 PLC (CS) 791 Const. P. 2377/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Atif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sect: Ministry of Textile Ind. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1416 2019 PLC (CS) 1145 Const. P. 6911/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imtiaz Ahmed Barakzai (Petitioner) VS Federal Tax Ombudsman and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1417 2018 SCMR 1272 Const. P. 4291/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syeda Sakina Riaz (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.1189/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.P.343-K/2017 Syeda Sakina Riaz v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted. Relist after 3 months
1418 Const. P. 5835/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ali Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.6-K/2018 Muhammad Ali Kamal v. Province of Sindh and anothers Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1419 2018 YLR Note 82 Cr.Bail 888/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD AHSAN S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1420 Const. P. 8412/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muttahida Workers Front (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1421 Cr.Bail 845/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 LUTUFULLAH S/O MARAZ KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 27-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1422 Const. P. 7368/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Sindh Club (Petitioner) VS Asif Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1423 Const. P. 662/1997 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1997 Zulfiqar Ali Nizamani & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1424 Const. P. 4306/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sher Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1425 Const. P. 6202/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Firdous (Petitioner) VS Sect: Educaiton and Literacy and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1426 Const. P. 4301/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1427 2018 PLC (CS) Note 55 Const. P. 4323/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Shahid Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.534-K/2017 Syed Shahid Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1428 Const. P. 920/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1429 Const. P. 4441/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1430 2017 PLC (CS) 1255 Const. P. 2543/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mansur-ul-Haque (Petitioner) VS Government of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.313-K/2017 Mansoor-ul-Haque v. Govt. of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Defence and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1431 2017 SBLR Sindh 1101 Const. P. 3979/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.186-K/2017 Muhammad Asif v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1432 Suit 614/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Muhammad Amin through LRs. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shamim Begum alias Lala (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1433 Const. P. 1526/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.441-K/2022 Lyari Development Authority & another v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1434 Const. P. 190/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Aqsa Mastoi (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1435 Const. P. 1091/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shamim and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1436 Const. P. 284/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2008 Jawaid Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Divisional Engineer NTC Hyderabad (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1437 Const. P. 291/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Wasim (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1438 Const. P. 973/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1439 Const. P. 114/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Khan Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1440 Const. P. 366/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Altaf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1441 Cr.Misc. 133/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS Deputy Inspector General of Police Shaheed Benazirabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1442 Const. P. 7173/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shaikh Shahbaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1443 Const. P. 2487/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1444 Const. P. 7088/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Wazir Gul & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1445 Const. P. 5453/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Kamran Baig (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1446 Const. P. 218/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Elbert son of Faredo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1447 Const. P. 75/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Amjad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Arif & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1448 Const. P. 366/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Allah Obhayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1449 Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Muzaffar Ali Jaffro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1450 Const. P. 1094/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Irshad Begum (Petitioner) VS Mst. Shamim & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1451 Cr.Misc. 182/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ch. Azeem Ahmed (Applicant) VS S.H.O P.S Sanjar Chang District Tando Allahyar & 17 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1452 Cr.Acq.A. 28/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Erum Abdul Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Hayat & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1453 Cr.Bail 330/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mehrab Khan Shar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1454 I. A 15/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Haq Nawaz (Appellant) VS M/S ZTBL and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1455 Const. P. 2705/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1456 Conf.Case 3/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Hassan alias Ali Hassan and others. (Appellant) VS Mst. Halima Chandio (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1457 Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1458 Cr.Bail 29/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1459 2018 PLC (CS) Note 61 Const. P. 69/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Muhammad Arif & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-17 Yes Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.541-K/2017 Syed Muhammad Arif v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.4581/2018 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad v. Jameel Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of
1460 Const. P. 319/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mahadev (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1461 Const. P. 542/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Salman Siddiqui & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.592-K/2018 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Salman Siddiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1462 Const. P. 1017/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Rashid and 93 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-17 Yes Petitioners have impugned the Notification whereby they have been relieved / repatriated to their parent department that is Karachi Development Authority. The reason assigned by the competent authority in the said impugned Notification is that the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan passed directives vide order dated 01.08.2016 on CMA No. 243/2016 in C.P No.108-K of 2014 to repatriate the officers/officials absorbed in Malir Development Authority to their parent department .In our view, once the Honble Supreme Court has passed order the terms that any official working on deputation or otherwise absorbed in the MDA shall immediately report back to his parent department this Court has no justification to take contrary view of the same. We are of the view that the only remedy available to the Petitioners is to approach the Honble Apex Court in Review and not this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. Consequently ,both the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.402-K/2017 Shahid Ali Khan v. Province of Sindh and others,C.P.560-K/2017 Muhammad Zahid Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1463 Const. P. 2826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1464 Const. P. 2688/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 M.Achar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1465 Const. P. 94/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1897/2019 Munawar Ahmed Narejo & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary School Education & Litracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1466 Const. P. 678/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Haji Dhani Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1467 Cr.Tran 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ismail Dahri (Appellant) VS Learned Specail Judge ATC SBA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1468 2021 PLC (CS) 329 Const. P. 1559/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Wahid Bux Chadhar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1469 Cr.Bail 277/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Badal Waryah through (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1470 Cr.Bail 470/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2014 Abdul Sattar Ujjan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1471 Cr.Bail 335/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Gada Hussain Shaikh (Applicant) VS the State (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1472 Const. P. 1174/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.384-K/2019 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1473 Const. P. 6899/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s S. Zia-ul-Haq & Sons (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1474 Const. P. 2700/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1475 Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1476 Const. P. 4389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Lutfullah Kalhoro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1477 2020 NLR Note 202020, 2020 PLC (CS) 268 Const. P. 333/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mian Syed Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1116-K/2018 Mian Syed Hussain v. Province of Sindh thr. Food Deptt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1478 Const. P. 6990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nawal Kishore and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1479 Const. P. 4250/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Jameela (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-20 No Review Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1454-K/2018 Mst. Jameela v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1480 Const. P. 916/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sub-Engineer / Staff Welfare Association (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1481 Const. P. 6745/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sikandar Khan Laghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1482 Const. P. 5619/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pir Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1483 Const. P. 5808/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Riaz Hussain Kanasoro and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1484 Const. P. 2415/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Raja Muhammad Asad Khan (Petitioner) VS D.E.O Sanghar and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1485 Const. P. 8152/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1486 Const. P. 1643/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Mirza Hassan Ali (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills Corp. & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1487 Const. P. 2117/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1995 Ansarul Hayue & Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Broadcasting Corp. & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1488 Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes Prima-facie, the question of downgrading the petitioner in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the petitioner to avail his remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondent-company, if any. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1489 Const. P. 1740/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Ghafoor Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1490 Const. P. 6063/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2965/2018 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.68-K/2019 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1491 Const. P. 6063/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2965/2018 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.68-K/2019 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1492 Const. P. 4637/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Quetta Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3311/2018 M/s Qutta Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secy. Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.95-K/2019 M/s Qutta Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secy. Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1493 Const. P. 5680/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Hyder Ali Liskani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4402/2017 Hyder Ali Liskani & others v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1610/2017 Hyder Ali Liskani & others v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1494 Const. P. 783/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govr. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2967/2018 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.70-K/2019 M/s Kassim Textile (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1495 Const. P. 5779/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s S. Zia ul Haq & Sons (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1496 Const. P. 479/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Phoenix Security Services (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2970/2018 M/s Phoenix Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.73-K/2019 M/s Phoenix Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
1497 Const. P. 539/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Younus Textile Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1498 Const. P. 6439/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qudoos Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1499 Const. P. 2659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khalid Hameed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1500 Const. P. 875/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mirza Ashfaque Ahmed Baig (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1501 Cr.Bail 606/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Niazal Brohi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1502 Const. P. 5776/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1503 Const. P. 1279/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Nikhat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1504 2018 SBLR Sindh 1641 Const. P. 4236/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Bashir Ahmed lanjwani (Petitioner) VS Provvince of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1505 2018 PLC (CS) Note 121 Const. P. 2798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Arham Aziz Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1506 2018 PLC (CS) Note 177 Const. P. 6940/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1507 2019 PLC (CS) 1258 Const. P. 3472/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M. Afzal Kausar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.544-K/2018 Muhammad Afzal Kausar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1508 2019 PLC (CS) 1231 Const. P. 3491/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Lal Badshah And Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman K.P.T And Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.211-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.P.212-K/2020 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another,C.A.46-K/2022 The Chairman Karachi Port Trust (KPT) and another v. Lal Badshah and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Session),Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
1509 2019 SCMR 984 Const. P. 6555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maj (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.514-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.26-K/2018 Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed
1510 Const. P. 3292/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Asif Abbasi V/S NED University & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Asif Abbasi (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.632-K/2018 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi,C.A.135-K/2019 NED University of Engineering & Technology Karachi and others v. Asif Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
1511 Const. P. 5140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Loads Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3075/2018,C.P.3076/2018,C.A.81-K/2019,C.A.82-K/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1512 Const. P. 7119/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Multinational Export Bureau (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1513 Const. P. 2811/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Capt. Saifuddin (Petitioner) VS P.I.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1514 Const. P. 7964/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ashiq Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.623-K/2018 Ashiq Ali Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1515 2020 PLC (CS) 50 Const. P. 3387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1516 Const. P. 422/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Hafizullah & ors (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4655/2018,C.P.574/2019,C.A.1125/2019,C.A.1127/2019 SCP Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Leave Granted , stay,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.
1517 Const. P. 4422/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.2976/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Petroleum & Natural Resources Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1518 Const. P. 1282/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Haji Rafiudduin Waliuddin (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1519 Const. P. 2913/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Hi-Tech Packages (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1520 Const. P. 523/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Muhammad Jurial Chandio (Petitioner) VS MPA Aziz Ahmed Jatoi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1521 Const. P. 569/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Rasoom Bhagat (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1522 Const. P. 6016/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Buyer Pakitstan (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1523 Const. P. 624/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/S Good Luck Industries (Petitioner) VS Government oF Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1524 Const. P. 3525/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ghulam Rasool Saand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1525 Cr.Misc. 1218/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Mst. Zuriat W/o Sheeral Khan (Applicant) VS Kouro Khan @ Kouro and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1526 Cr.Bail 345/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Hazaro Khan son of Gul Hassan Gopang (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1527 Const. P. 138/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Qasim Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & 7 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1898/2019 Shabbir Ahmed Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary School Education & Litracy Department, Karachi & others,C.P.481-K/2020 Wazir Hussain Rajpar v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Interior, Govt. of Pakistan Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of
1528 Const. P. 125/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Hussain Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1529 Const. P. 1151/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr Fozia Akmal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-AUG-19 Yes whether the services of the petitioner as Consultant Gynecologist in SESSI can be regularized Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1530 Const. P. 5387/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-AUG-19 Yes as to how the promotion of the Petitioner can be considered, when no Departmental Promotion Committee has been convened by the competent authority, besides that he is at the verge of retirement i.e. in the Month of September 2019 Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1531 Const. P. 3687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1532 Const. P. 1352/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Niaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 No Contempt Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1533 Const. P. 3629/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst.Mumtaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1534 Const. P. 3078/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Aftab Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1535 Const. P. 1027/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mir Muhammad &others (Petitioner) VS S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1536 Const. P. 3150/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sajad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1537 Const. P. 2739/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shabbir Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1538 Const. P. 2765/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Darya Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1539 Const. P. 2731/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mustaqeem Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1540 Const. P. 5632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Mohsin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 Yes Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1541 Const. P. 5714/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Qurban Ali (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Regularization of their service under Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--instant Petition clearly falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in the month of October 2016 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to them in the month of September 2013, i.e. approximately 3 years prior to the filing of the instant Petition. Those who slept over there cannot be given premium. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is guiding principle on the issue of laches-- Dismissed. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1542 Const. P. 2378/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Nazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1543 Const. P. 3130/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Faisal Mughal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.827/2020 Faisal Mughal v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Water and Power, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1544 Const. P. 126/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imran Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1545 Const. P. 1537/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Ghani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1546 Const. P. 1893/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Basit & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1547 Const. P. 1774/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Mir Mohammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1548 Const. P. 310/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Hai (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1075-K/2022 Nizamuddin Mansoori thr.L.Rs. v. Abdul Lateef Rajput & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
1549 Const. P. 2671/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1550 Const. P. 8185/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.691-K/2019 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.20-K/2022 Abdul Basit v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1551 Const. P. 2833/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1552 Const. P. 6817/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1553 Const. P. 4329/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-19 No post of ASI/Computer operator whether they have wear uniform or otherwise is yet to be determined Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.240-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio and others,C.A.928/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Tahir Khan Chandio and others,C.P.877-K/2021 Muhammad Faisal & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1554 Const. P. 3391/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Faisal Rajar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1555 Const. P. 1639/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Shafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.M.A.2348/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others,C.P.3787/2020 Tando Allayyar Press Club through Muhammad Sajid Khan v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Govt. Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered and also notice be issued,Disposed Disposed of
1556 Const. P. 721/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Irrigation matter Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1557 Const. P. 2399/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Nusrat Phulphoto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1558 Const. P. 2374/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1559 Const. P. 676/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Abdul Salam and others (Petitioner) VS Jan Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1560 Const. P. 2452/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1561 Const. P. 2608/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1562 Const. P. 2965/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1563 Const. P. 370/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1564 Const. P. 1952/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Samani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1565 2020 SBLR Sindh 715 Const. P. 5924/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Baluchistan Wheel Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Industries - wise Trade NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-SEP-19 Yes To appreciate the aforesaid proposition, reference is made to Article 199(1) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, reproduced as under: - ???A High Court may if it is satisfied that no other adequate remedy is provided by law:- (a) on the application of any aggrieved party make an order??? (i) Directing??????. (ii) Declaring??????..??? 9. The above referred Article lays condition of satisfaction of this Court as to absence of any adequate remedy available under the law to the person/party invoking constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, Petitioner-establishment besides being aggrieved should have locus standi to approach this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. We have noticed that the certificate of registration issued by the Respondent No.1 is still in existence. The objection, which has now been raised by the petitioner-establishment, through the instant writ petition on the aforesaid pleas can hardly been looked into by this Court in presence of remedy provided to the Petitioner-Establishment under section 12 of Industrial Relations Act. Besides that the learned Counsel could not advance any convincing reason to establish that the Petitioner-establishment is an aggrieved party which can impugn registration of the Respondent No.2???s-Union by the Respondent No. 01 vide Order dated 25.7.2017 in constitutional jurisdiction of this court. Hence, the instant petition is a futile exercise. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1566 Const. P. 2784/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Huzoor Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1567 Const. P. 3535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1568 Const. P. 1627/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Meenhal & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1569 Civil Revision 41/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Usman and others (Applicant) VS Shoaib (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1570 Const. P. 5783/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nazir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-19 Yes Adverse remarks ???Not Yet Fit??? Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1571 2021 PLC (CS) 415 Const. P. 948/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Umer Yamin (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of Junior Clerk on the basis of Son/ quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974. The appointment in Sindh Police can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.621-K/2019 Umar Yameen v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt: and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1572 Const. P. 639/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Arshad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1573 Const. P. 2043/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Farman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1574 Const. P. 2370/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1575 Const. P. 961/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 ShabbirHasan&another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1576 Const. P. 1134/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sindh Growers Alliance (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1577 Suit 1153/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 DR.HABIBUR REHMAN SOOMRO (Plaintiff) VS FED.OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 23-NOV-20 No Learned counsel for defendant No.3 has submitted that his grievance is only to the extent of removal of the word ' consent' from the aforesaid order---, I am not persuaded by the contention of the learned counsel for defendant No.3 that any case of Review is made out. This review application, therefore, merits dismissal as, in my view, the order dated 01.10.2019 was based on correct factual as well as the legal position of the case and I do not find any inherent flaw floating on the surface of the record requiring my interference, therefore, the question of calling in question the order by invoking the review jurisdiction is misconceived--dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1578 Const. P. 8184/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Adeel Khan (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes we do not concur with findings of the learned Appellate Tribunal, Sindh, as the private respondents/workers were inducted in service without completing the codal formalities and entire evidence supports the case/contention of the KPT. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.690-K/2019 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi,C.A.19-K/2022 Adeel Khan v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sindh Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1579 Const. P. 898/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1580 Const. P. 2939/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nasir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1581 Const. P. 1185/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1582 Const. P. 1318/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Naimuddin Advocate (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Contempt Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1583 Const. P. 733/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1584 Const. P. 3768/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Yakoob (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1585 Const. P. 2963/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS THE State (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1586 Const. P. 2389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zahid (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1587 Const. P. 3009/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ayoub Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1588 Const. P. 3269/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Allah Jurrio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1589 Const. P. 3707/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1590 Const. P. 2340/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Noor Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1591 Const. P. 3127/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Faiz Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1592 Const. P. 221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1593 Const. P. 3089/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jahangir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1594 Const. P. 1578/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1595 Const. P. 521/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rights Now Pakistan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1596 Const. P. 2928/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1597 Const. P. 2656/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ali Nawaz Bagrani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1598 Const. P. 2/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Pokarlal and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1599 Const. P. 3551/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Nabi Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1600 Const. P. 2176/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pakistan Intellectual Property Rights Association (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-20 No After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as learned DAG, we are of the view that there is no legal impediment in accepting their request for disposal of the instant petition in the above terms. Accordingly, by consent the petition and listed application stand disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1601 Const. P. 1652/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Qudos Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. quo warranto--Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of quo warranto against respondents 9 to 11 to vacate the office presently they are holding, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not qualified to hold the office and their appointments are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973--The above discussions lead us to an irresistible conclusion that the instant petition being incompetent is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no orders as to cost. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1602 Const. P. 38/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Aijaz Ali Narejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
1603 Const. P. 12/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Afzal Khan S/o Muhammad Hanif Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1604 Const. P. 7506/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Razzaque & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Directorate of Human Rights, Government of Sindh. They have alleged that their cases were put up before the Selection Committee on 20.03.2018 wherein minutes in this regard were prepared and the Committee, without assigning valid and cogent reasons and in a scanty and vague manner, did not consider their cases for regularization which action is impugned through the captioned petitions before this Court--Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1605 Const. P. 1566/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Syed Asghar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed C.P.455-K/2020 Syed Asghar Ali Shah v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1606 Const. P. 456/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Khalil-Ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS PEPCO Wapda &ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1607 I. A 12/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Ghaffar (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aalam & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes The encroachment of amenity plot cannot be allowed to sustain under the law, which aspect, the official respondents have to look into and restore its position in accordance with law. The encroachment of an amenity plot to another use is treated as an abuse of discretion and therefore is unlawful for the simple reason that the paramount object of modern city planning is to ensure maximum comforts for the residents of the city by providing maximum facilities and that a public functionary entrusted with the work to achieve the above object cannot act in a manner, which may defeat the above objective and deviation from the planned scheme will naturally result in discomfort and inconvenience to others. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1608 Const. P. 2113/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Maryam Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1609 Criminal Appeal 212/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: 1200 grams of charas 2019 Parvaiz (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-AUG-20 Yes 1200 grams of charas appeal allowed 1200 grams of charas appeal allowed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1610 Const. P. 813/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Koonj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1611 Const. P. 518/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Furqan Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.734-K/2022 Syed Furqan Ali & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session -- Before 3 HJJ ]
1612 R.A (Civil Revision) 122/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Mola Bux & Ors (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1613 Const. P. 723/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Farooqu-e-Azam & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1614 Const. P. 1257/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Syed Anwar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed C.P.2466/2020 M/s Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited thr. its President, Islamabad and others v. Syed Anwar Ali Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
1615 Cr.Misc. 359/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Hussain Bux Rajper (Applicant) VS The State & 7 Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1616 Const. P. 824/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1617 Const. P. 4327/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1618 Const. P. 2692/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahnawaz and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-20 Yes Seniority matter--SRP--Police Constables--Adverting to the point raised by learned counsel for the petitioners that they were appointed in SRP Karachi and posted in RRF Karachi since 2009, thus their seniority is liable to be maintained in Karachi range, suffice it to say that prima-facie, the RRF was / is not part of the Karachi range, but is a combination of different regions/units of the Sindh police, merely their appointment in SRP Karachi and posting in RRF Karachi does not support their case to the effect that they belonged to Karachi Range Police, for the reason that they never remained posted in the Karachi range police, therefore, their seniority cannot be ordered to be mixed with Karachi range police. The record further reflects that their recommendations for initial appointments by their regional head were made based on their respective place of domicile. Petitioners have failed to point out that their appointment was / is based on Karachi domicile, therefore they are precluded to claim vested right for seniority and promotion at Karachi Range on the aforesaid analogy--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1438-K/2020 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others,C.A.57-K/2021 Shah Nawaz & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned
1619 Cr.J.A 58/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Subhan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1620 Const. P. 683/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr Muhammad Khan Shar & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1621 Criminal Appeal 89/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Paryal @ Haji (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1622 Const. P. 6868/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Arsalan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-20 Yes the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. the petitioners have prayed that the respondents may be directed to recall / cancel the result for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (BPS-09), for Karachi range and reschedule test / interview for the aforesaid posts---Petitioners have emphasized that in the final result the respondents-commission declared them failed without disclosing the reason--In our view, the written test does not gauge the personality of the candidate or his communication skills or his leadership or decision making abilities which are left to be examined at the time of interview. For this proposition, our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri vs. Federation of Pakistan and others, 2014 S C M R 157--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.369-K/2020 Muhammad Saleem v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1623 Const. P. 613/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Asim Gul (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Corpt. Of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1624 Const. P. 2044/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1625 Const. P. 2882/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1626 Const. P. 1403/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Ali Dindo Channa (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1627 Const. P. 538/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-19 No The aforesaid order was merged in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, however, the findings of learned Rent Controller that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and disposed of Rent Application being infructuous. Prima-facie, the aforesaid findings explicitly suggest that he has taken the decision in the light of order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court; therefore, the applicant ought to have availed the remedy as provided under Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 and not before this Court, in a disposed of matter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1628 Const. P. 2536/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Raza Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1629 Const. P. 424/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Farman Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1630 Const. P. 7359/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nazar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1631 Const. P. 4533/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1632 Const. P. 3203/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Naeem ul Haq and Ors (Petitioner) VS CEO, Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1633 Const. P. 1741/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Sadia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1634 Const. P. 4905/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 Yes The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1635 Const. P. 7994/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Majeed Shar (Petitioner) VS NED Univeristy and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-20 No We are of the view that final order is yet to be passed by the respondents pursuant to the inquiry, and as far as the present petition is concerned, the same has become infructuous as the impugned show cause notice has merged into the inquiry report. We are of the view that final order is yet to be passed by the respondents pursuant to the inquiry, and as far as the present petition is concerned, the same has become infructuous as the impugned show cause notice has merged into the inquiry report. Regarding the petitioners contention that allegation contained in the impugned show cause notice was false and/or malafide, suffice it to say if any adverse order is passed against him by the respondents, he will be at liberty to challenge the same before the competent forum in accordance with law and to urge such ground, or as many grounds as he wants, in his said appeal. With this observation, the petition is disposed of along with listed application with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1636 2022 CLC 442 Const. P. 569/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Syed Asghar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Secretary Local Govt & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed C.P.456-K/2020 Syed Asghar Ali Shah v. Secretary Local Government and Housing Town Planning Govt. of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1637 I. A 18/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 National Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) VS Abdul Sattar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1638 Criminal Appeal 33/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ayaz alias Cottan Shah. (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1639 Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-20 No To appreciate the aforesaid contentions of the petitioner, let notice be issued to respondents 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 as well as to the learned Attorney General of Pakistan and learned Advocate General of Sindh under Order XXVII(A) of CPC. The Chief Secretary Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1640 Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-20 No For further hearing and compliance of our above directions, adjourned to 06.07.2020. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1641 Cr.Bail 377/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Paryal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1642 Const. P. 4526/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aziz Ullah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1643 Const. P. 2497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Kifayat Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No Service matter. Notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 29.05.2020 at 10:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1644 Const. P. 448/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Nadeem Iqbal & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1645 Civil Revision 131/1986 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1986 Khanzada Siddi Yakoob and others (Applicant) VS Abdul Ghafoor and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1646 Const. P. 3376/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1647 Const. P. 2690/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Wakeel (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1648 Const. P. 2051/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1649 Const. P. 1856/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1650 2023 PLC Lab. 41 Const. P. 3026/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1651 Const. P. 856/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ameer Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1652 Const. P. 319/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Nisha & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1653 Const. P. 1400/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Lt. Commander (R) Engr: Abdul Aziz Narejo (Petitioner) VS K.P.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-20 No We have heard the learned counsel on the subject issue and have gone through the order dated 16.11.2020 passed by this Court. In our view, accidental errors can be corrected if such error being apparent on the face of the record. Our view is supported by the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Tufail and 3 others v. Ghulam Farid and 4 others (2000 SCMR 1035)-- In view of the above factual position of the case, the listed application is allowed as prayed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1654 Const. P. 5652/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1655 Civil Revision 185/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Yousuf (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1656 Const. P. 4890/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Garibdas (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-20 Yes It is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, competent authority and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. With the above observations and direction, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs. Let notice be issued for compliance to the Chief Secretary Sindh and the Secretaries of all the departments of the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1657 Const. P. 6032/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Waqarullah Korejo Advocate (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1658 Const. P. 215/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1659 Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
1660 Const. P. 5577/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Amjad Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 Yes K-Electric-NIRC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1661 Const. P. 3597/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Mohammad Ashfaq Khan Lodhi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1662 Const. P. 828/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shaukat Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1663 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 309 Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1664 Const. P. 4534/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Waheed (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1665 Const. P. 200/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahida Hameed and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1666 Const. P. 648/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Unar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 Yes seeking direction to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, for transferring Chairman and Controller of Examination, Sindh Public Service Commission--Since the issue is confined to the transfer and posting of respondents 3 & 4 who are civil servants and the petitioner cannot seek direction for posting of a civil servant of his choice and it is for respondents 1&2 to look into their conduct and affairs of SPSC. Reference may be made to the case of Peer Muhammad v. Government of Balochistan and others, 2007 SCMR 54. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1667 Const. P. 315/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Sheroz Kamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 Yes Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no appointment order had been issued, thus no vested right has accrued in favour of the petitioner. It is well-settled law that even a successful candidate does not acquire an indefeasible right to be appointed and that it could be legitimately denied. The notification inviting application for the appointment has been held only to be an invitation to the qualified candidates to apply for the recruitment. On his mere applying or offer/selection, he does not acquire any right to the post. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1668 Const. P. 8779/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Mumtaz Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.83-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Syed Mukhtiar Hussain & others,C.P.746-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Syed Mukhtiar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1669 Const. P. 8056/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saddam Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.82-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others,C.P.745-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1670 Const. P. 8056/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saddam Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.82-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others,C.P.745-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1671 Const. P. 6528/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Imran Sultan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.84-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Muhammad Imran Sultan & others,C.P.747-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Muhammad Imran Sultan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1672 Const. P. 702/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Kamaluddin and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-20 No NIRC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1673 Const. P. 173/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1289-K/2020 Ishaque Ahmed v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1674 2022 PLC (CS) 307 Const. P. 6948/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Anis Haroon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes i) Whether the post of Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the United Nations is to be filled amongst the career foreign service officers or eminent personalities from business, media, law, and other areas on a contract basis ; ii) Whether the Prime Minister of Pakistan is the competent authority under Rule 15(1)(g)(h) of the Rules of Business, 1973 or the Federal Cabinet under Article 90 of the Constitution of Pakistan to make such appointment ; and, iii) Whether appointments on a contract basis are prohibited under or contrary to Section 14 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, and the Policy unless the conditions specified therein are satisfied? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1675 Const. P. 1526/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mirza Mukarram Hayat Baig & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Prov. Of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.736-K/2022 Mirza Mukarram Hayat Baig & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session -- Before 3 HJJ ]
1676 Const. P. 1/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Allah Obhayo & Other (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1677 Const. P. 4524/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mushtaq Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1678 Const. P. 3170/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1679 Const. P. 3815/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Maqsood Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1680 Const. P. 1411/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Matloob Ahmed Shafiqui and Ors (Petitioner) VS The President ZTBL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 No Commutation--Before dilating upon the merits of the case; and, since the issue of pensionary and allied benefits and its calculation and recalculation is involved in the present proceedings; and, even before taking cognizance of the matter for enforcing the judgments of the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, we at the first instance deem it appropriate to direct the competent authority of respondent-bank to undertake the exercise of recalculation of the pensionary benefits of the petitioners including commutation of pension and interest accrued thereon as directed by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid judgments, under rules and regulations as well as office memorandums as discussed supra. The comprehensive report has to be submitted by the respondent-bank within one (01) month from the receipt of the order of this Court. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.4579/2021 The President, Zarai Taraqiati Bank Ltd, Islamabad v. Matloob Ahmed Shafiqui and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1681 Const. P. 6666/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mohsin Furqan (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-21 Yes proforma promotion in the rank of SEVP--NBP--Thus in our opinion, the impugned action taken by the competent authority of the respondent-bank was proper and based on reasonable grounds as well as in the terms of the promotion policy in vogue--it is a well-established principle in service jurisprudence that promotion from the backdate to the retired Public Servant cannot be granted until and unless he meets the criteria prescribed under the law; and, after his retirement from the respondent-bank in the light of the decision of Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the case of Government of Pakistan and others v. Hameed Akhter Niazi and others (PLD 2003 SC 110) Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.434-K/2021 Mohsin Furqan v. National Bank of Pakistan & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1682 Const. P. 327/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Nasir Shahzad (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1683 Const. P. 297/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Madam (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1684 Const. P. 3363/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1685 Const. P. 3652/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ali Murad Sipio (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1686 Const. P. 89/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Humera and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1687 Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-20 No By consent, this petition and the applications pending therein are disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Office is directed to communicate this order immediately to learned Official Assignee, and Additional Registrars of this Court at the Sukkur Bench and Circuit Courts at Hyderabad and Larkana. Issue notice to Chief Secretary Sindh and Chairman Sindh Service Public Commission for compliance. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1688 Const. P. 268/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shah Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-21 No appointment of Chairman Federal Public Service Commission Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1689 Const. P. 730/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Shakeela (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Arif Abbasi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1690 Const. P. 636/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahid Jamil and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-21 No Differently abled person quota Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1691 Const. P. 1982/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1692 Const. P. 88/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1693 Const. P. 5645/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rubeena Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1694 Const. P. 339/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-21 No laches--dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1695 Const. P. 2884/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sikandar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.381-K/2020 Sikandar Ali & others v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1696 Const. P. 6256/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rizwan Farooq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 No Since respondent No.3 admittedly retired from service in the year 2002 i.e. 18 years ago, he is liable to vacate the subject quarter and the Estate Office is liable to take over possession thereof from him. Accordingly, respondents 1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to take over possession of the subject quarter strictly in accordance with law and the directions of the Hon???ble Supreme Court. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Since respondent No.3 admittedly retired from service in the year 2002 i.e. 18 years ago, he is liable to vacate the subject quarter and the Estate Office is liable to take over possession thereof from him. Accordingly, respondents 1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to take over possession of the subject quarter strictly in accordance with law and the directions of the Honble Supreme Court. The petition stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.259-K/2020 Fazal-e-Rabbi v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Housing & Works & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1697 Const. P. 741/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Rustam Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1698 2023 PLC Lab. Note 66 Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Zahid Hassan Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. DMC--the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for up-gradation of his post i.e Compounder in BPS-16--The grounds agitated by the petitioner in the instant petition that his up-gradation is permissible as per notification dated 13.05.2006, are not tenable for the reasons alluded in the preceding paragraph--we are not convinced with the assertion of petitioner that he is entitled for up-gradation in BS-16--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1699 Const. P. 119/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Naila & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1700 Const. P. 32/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Bashir Ahmed Phulpoto & others (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
1701 Const. P. 394/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Jaggan Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
1702 Const. P. 948/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Jhenwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1703 Criminal Appeal 173/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asad Ali Khaskheli (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1704 Const. P. 3399/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imtiaz Ali Sheikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1705 Const. P. 3029/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Fakeer Manthar (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1706 Const. P. 176/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Akber Kharani (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1286-K/2020 Akber Kharani v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1707 Const. P. 27/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Achar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1708 Const. P. 3383/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Atif and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1709 Const. P. 436/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Sultan Shah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1710 Const. P. 530/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Naseem (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1711 Cr.Bail 171/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Afroze @ Lamboo Ansari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1712 Const. P. 5653/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shakeela Bano (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1713 Const. P. 837/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Faraz Rehan S/o Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S. Sir Syed (Central) Khi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JAN-21 Yes Habeas Corpus directing the respondent-police officials to produce his minor son namely Master Zohan Faraz aged about 02 years to enable him to take his custody--I am of the view that the purpose of filing this petition is served as the minor has been produced before this Court; and, prima-facie the minor is no more in illegal custody as discussed in the preceding paragraph. Primarily, in the cases, concerning the custody of a child, this Court is not required to go into the intricacies/technicalities of the matter in constitutional jurisdiction and should confine its findings to the extent of the welfare of the child/minor which is a paramount consideration and it is for the learned Guardian and Wards Court to take appropriate measures in this regard. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1714 Const. P. 597/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Government of sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
1715 Const. P. 239/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Shazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1716 Const. P. 5909/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sajid Jalil (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-20 Yes It is a well-settled proposition of law that the Competent Authority is entitled to make rules in the interest of exigency of service and to remove anomalies in Service Rules. It is the Service Rules Committee which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion and it is essentially an administrative matter falling within the exclusive domain and policy decision making of the Respondent-Bank and the interference with such matters by the Courts is not warranted as no vested right of a Bank employee is involved in the matter of promotion, or the rules determining their eligibility or fitness, and in Bank Cases, the High Court has no jurisdiction through Writ to strike it down, except in the cases in which policy framed is against the public interest. This proposition of law has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in a plethora of judgments. Moreover, petitioner has not been able to point out any case where other employee(s), having rating equivalent to or lower than him, was / were promoted by the respondent-bank. Thus, prima facie it appears that the policy of the respondent is uniform and without any discrimination at least to the extent of the instant case. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.269/2021 Sajid Jalil v. National Bank of Pakistan through President, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1717 Const. P. 53/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Post Master General Khi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 Yes Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. Record reflects that petitioner has attained the age of superannuation in the year 2019, therefore, no further recovery can be initiated from his pensionery benefits. The respondents are directed to adjust the deducted amount in the pensionery benefits of the petitioner accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1222/2020 Director General, Pakistan Post, Islamabad & others v. Muhammad Ibrahim Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1718 Const. P. 3606/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1719 Const. P. 5193/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Fed. of Pakistan Chamber of Commerce & Ind & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5620/2021 The Federation of Pakistan Chamber of Commerce, Karachi and others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Labour and Human Resources Department Govt. of Sindh, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
1720 Const. P. 5098/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imtiaz Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1721 Const. P. 4925/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nazir Ahmed Palijo (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1722 Const. P. 645/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Abbas Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-21 No prayed for referring the matter to the Honble Chief Justice for formation of Larger Bench in terms of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Multiline Associates v. Ardeshir Cowasjee and 2 others (PLD 1995 SC 423) Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5054/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd thr. its M.D. Karachi v. Mohammad Abbas Khan and others,C.A.1482/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd thr. its M.D. Karachi v. Mohammad Abbas Khan and others,C.A.3045/2022 Chairman, National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Aijaz Ahmed Magsi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.also status quo,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed
1723 Const. P. 7382/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Akhtar Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-21 Yes issuance of offer/appointment orders to the post of Gavi Vaccinators (BPS-6) in the Health Department on the plea that they have already been declared successful candidates based on marks they obtained in the competitive process --i) Whether the recruitment process for the post of vaccinator (BPS-6) was flawed under the law? ii) Whether the Selection Committee was lawfully constituted; and, the Provincial Minister was competent to reduce the passing marks and facilitate private respondents/beneficiaries for appointment to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)? iii) Whether some of the private respondents/beneficiaries on the recommendation of the two-member Selection Committee were lawfully appointed as vaccinators in BPS-6? iv) Whether the petitioners can claim a right to be appointed through the two-member Selection Committee to the posts of vaccinators (BPS-6)?-- Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3111/2021 Ghayasuddin Shahani and others v. Akhtar Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1724 Const. P. 3590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Water & Power Development & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.559-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi & others,C.P.656-K/2021 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi v. Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
1725 Const. P. 1040/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Jawad Peeran (Petitioner) VS Athar Aftab and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1726 Const. P. 2707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1727 Const. P. 6449/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Iftikhar Hussain Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1728 Const. P. 6368/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ishtiaq & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1058-K/2021 Mohammad Ishtiaq & others v. Federation of Pakistan & anotherabdi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1729 Const. P. 3623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Air Marshal Arshad Malik and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.5882/2021 Pakistan International Airlines through Chief Executive PIA, Karachi v. Javed Iqbal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1730 Const. P. 391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Fayyaz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4118/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others,C.A.1563/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi v. Fayyaz Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of
1731 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 571/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1732 Const. P. 4535/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Jamil Khan (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 Yes Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2745/2022 Muhammad Jamil Khan v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1733 Const. P. 875/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ........... We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1376/2021,C.P.5119/2021,C.P.1092-K/2022,C.P.3914/2022,C.A.3991/2022,C.A.4009/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
1734 Const. P. 3001/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1735 Const. P. 5868/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Salman & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes In view of the above discussion, we are clear that petitioners proceeded on erroneous premises. On the issue of up-gradation, we seek guidance from the decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court rendered in the cases of GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore, and others Vs. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS and 29 others and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, NORTHERN REGION, ISLAMABAD, and another Vs. Syed MUNAWAR ALI and others (2017 P L C (C.S.) 1030). Therefore, in our view, the petitioners have been unable to make out a case for the up-gradation/re-designation of their posts as Inland Revenue Audit Officer (BPS-18) with retrospective effect, based on discrimination under Article 25 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3520/2021 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others,C.A.1919/2023 Muhammad Salman and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Pending
1736 Const. P. 7125/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Inayatullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.803-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Inayatullah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1737 Const. P. 3373/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abrar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 Yes proforma promotion Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1738 Const. P. 8001/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2935/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.476/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
1739 Const. P. 2790/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abu Bakar Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1740 Const. P. 2686/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1741 Const. P. 2686/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1742 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 562/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1743 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Collector & another (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1744 Const. P. 5073/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sartaj Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1393/2021,C.P.5136/2021,C.P.1096-K/2022,C.P.3920/2022,C.A.3995/2022,C.A.4015/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
1745 Const. P. 4848/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Tanveer Hyder Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes Prim facie, the petitioner has a qualifying length of service to his credit and he gave various reasons to claim the interest on the delayed payments. It is well-settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder---Thus, the competent authority of Pakistan-Railways is liable to release the withheld amount with profit and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 5.6.2017 to date. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1746 II.A. 25/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Pakistan International Airline (Appellant) VS Suresh Kumar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.166-K/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v. Suresh Kumar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1747 Const. P. 5927/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Gazetted Officers Association (School Admin Cadre) (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1748 Const. P. 7126/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Tehseen Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.804-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & others v. Tehseen Shahzad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1749 Const. P. 7678/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 HBL (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAR-21 Yes HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (NIRC-FB) in Appeal No.12(18)/2015-K, whereby order dated 05.01.2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Commission, at Karachi (NIRC-SB), in Grievance Petition No.4B (187)/2012-K, filed by the private respondent, was allowed with the compensatory cost of Rs.100,000/- while granting salary and all admissible back benefits to him by treating him to be in service from the date of his dismissal from service i.e. 09.09.2003, till reaching the age of superannuation i.e. 12.12.2012; and, he was also declared to be entitled to have pensionary benefits with effect from 12.12.2012 in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by this Court in C.P. No.D-886 of 2011. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3062/2021 Habib Bank Limited, Karachi v. Full Bench, National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1750 Const. P. 1846/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 S.M Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 Yes Here the case of the petitioner is quite different, as he stood retired from service of KW&SB in the year 2020, and the DPC for promotion to BS-20 could not take place to consider his case. Besides he remained silent for the intervening period, except by moving two applications to the competent authority, the reason is obvious that he was enjoying the post in BPS 20 in violation of dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of the Province of Sindh Vs Ghulam Fareed and others 2014 SCMR 1189 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1751 Const. P. 5030/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rafique Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes the petitioner has prayed that official respondents be directed to take over possession of the subject official accommodation i.e House No. Annexe No.2 situated at GOR-1 Bath Island Karachi from respondent No. 3 and to hand over the same to him as it has been allotted to him vide allotment order dated 16.11.2017 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1605-K/2021 Dr.Zeba Hussain Soomro v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1752 Const. P. 399/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Mustafa Bugti (Petitioner) VS S.E Operation Circle SEPCO Larkana & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUL-21 Yes Transfer and Posting Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1753 Const. P. 580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Mansoob Ahmed Khatri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2285/2022 Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority through Director General, Karachi v. Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1754 Const. P. 3386/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehreen Fatima and Others (Petitioner) VS Learned / Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 Yes It is pertinent to mention that services of the petitioners fall within the ambit of master and servant hence servant cannot compel the master with regard to his posting on the plea of wedlock policy as in field but that alone shall not be a reason and terms and conditions are to be followed. Without prejudice to the issue pending before the NIRC which presently is not available, at present we are not inclined to grant relief and stay transfer of the petitioners hence petition is dismissed. However petitioners will be at liberty to agitate their issue before NIRC as and when bench is available and this order shall not be used against them. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1755 Const. P. 1735/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Amjad Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No The above provision, prima facie, vests jurisdiction and competence in Government to constitute a committee for purpose, as may be prescribed. This provision, prima facie, is aimed to deal with any situation which cant be confined to safety but shall always be deemed to include all steps, as necessary to ensure complete protection to rights and interests of the workers. Accordingly, Federation and Province shall submit complete measures taken by them with regard to establishing any institute or mining committee of the independent persons to safeguard the interest of workers of mines. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1756 Cr.J.A 29/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Azmat Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-JUL-21 Yes Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1757 Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1758 Const. P. 6162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 Yes reinstatement in service as Staff SDO (B&R)--immoral activities--Article 199(3) of the Constitution--Dismissed. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1759 Const. P. 5657/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi (Petitioner) VS N.B.P (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-21 Yes NBP--Dismissal from service Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.467-K/2021 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi,C.A.17/2024 National Bank of Pakistan v. Ghulam Murtaza Abbasi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
1760 Const. P. 1555/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5467/2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio v. Federation o Pakistan the Secretary, Establishment Division Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1761 Const. P. 3985/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aurangzaib (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-21 Yes the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1762 Const. P. 7622/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zulfiqar Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5304/2021,C.P.1671-K/2021,C.P.6600/2021,C.A.352/2022,C.A.349/2022,C.A.347/2022,C.A.355/2022,C.P.6603/2021,C.P.2799/2023,C.P.L.A.5222/2023,C.M.A.8564/2023,C.P.L.A.3323/2023,C.P.L.A.5224/2023 SCP Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed Leave Granted.all connected CMAs are allowed.CPs be numbered and also leave is Granted,Disposed ,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Pending ,Pending Adjourned,Disposed Allowed,Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
1763 Const. P. 4789/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nudrat Buland Iqbal (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1764 Const. P. 341/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Tarique Ali (Petitioner) VS SDO Irrigation Taluka Mehar (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1765 Const. P. 7638/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Waseemullah (Petitioner) VS The SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1766 Const. P. 2209/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Muhammad Umar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Govt. of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1767 Const. P. 2209/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Muhammad Umar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Govt. of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1768 Const. P. 2209/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Muhammad Umar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Govt. of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1769 Const. P. 2094/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zahida Quadri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1770 Const. P. 3603/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shanaz Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1771 Const. P. 3730/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mohsin Jameel & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1772 Const. P. 2573/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1773 Const. P. 2828/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Abu Bakar Kabir Suleman (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1774 Const. P. 6261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-AUG-21 Yes M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.4450/2019 (M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. Karachi v. The Registrar Trade Unions, C/o National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad, and others), to the Registrar, National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), for conducting the referendum with respect of determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC as provided under the Industrial Relations Act, 2012--we direct the Deputy Registrar NIRC to announce the result of the referendum for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent (CBA) for the workmen employed in Petitioner-SSGC. However, it is made clear that, if any of the parties in the proceedings is aggrieved by the outcome of the result of the referendum, they are at liberty to avail and exhaust their respective remedies in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1775 Const. P. 5878/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khalid Mansoor (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 Yes reinstatement along with back benefits Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1776 Const. P. 2388/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arifa Khatoon (Petitioner) VS The Governor of Sindh / Chancellor & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1777 Const. P. 2926/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sajjasd Haider Jhin Jhin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No The petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned transfer order and non-consideration of his case for promotion in BPS-20 has approached this Court on 16.3.2019.To see as to whether the transfer and posting order of the petitioner is based on extraneous consideration or otherwise during the pendency of this lis, just to deprive the petitioner for considering his case for promotion in BPS-20, let notice be repeated upon the respondents for 10.9.2021. In the meanwhile, if the petitioner is not relieved from his present posting, his posting may not be disturbed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1778 Const. P. 5860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1779 Const. P. 8038/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zafar Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.202-K/2022 Zafar Ahmed & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1780 Const. P. 4112/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 Yes Petitioner seeks appointment in the Karachi University as Adhoc Teacher, based on differently-abled quota on the premise that he was/is a qualified and fit person to be considered for the subject post. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1781 Const. P. 2580/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noman Ahmed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Board of Intermdiate Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1782 Const. P. 5398/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Safdar Husain Mangi and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5609/2021 Safdar Hussain Mangi and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 09-Dec-21) at 11:30 a.m.
1783 Const. P. 1461/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Deceased Abdul Karim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1784 Const. P. 5144/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dr. Iltaf Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 Yes they have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments/services be regularized in respondent-Water and Power Development Authority (`WAPDA`) without discrimination, with a further assertion that they have already served in WAPDA for a considerable period and they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis rather than joining fresh process with other candidates-- Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1519-K/2021 WAPDA through its Director Legal & others v. Dr.Haresh Kumar & others,C.P.1580/2022 Water and Power Development Authority thr. its Chairman, Lahore & others v. Dr. Altaf Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Pending
1785 Const. P. 3578/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jamil Farooqui (Petitioner) VS KMC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 No In the given circumstances, respondents are ordered to provide whatever material is available with them against the petitioner to the Petitioner, who to be confronted in accordance with law and let the proceedings take place as such against the petitioner after having given due opportunity of hearing and let a speaking order be passed no later than three (03) weeks from the date hereof, failing which appropriate orders will be passed by this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1786 Cr.Bail 319/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Majid Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes For the above reasons, the applicant Majid Ali has made out a case for post-arrest bail in FIR No.42 of 2021, registered with Police Station Darri, District Larkana, for offenses punishable under sections 452, 376, and 511 P.P.C. Accordingly, the applicant is admited to post arrest bail; he shall be released in the aforesaid crime subject to furnishing his bail bond in the sum of Rs.50, 000/- (Fifty Thousand Ruprees) and P.R bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1787 Const. P. 7700/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Husnain Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes Health Department, Government of Sindh, whereby the petitioners may be allowed to pursue their academic medical career subject to extraordinary leave (without pay) for the required period--At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners in substance has pleaded discrimination as they were not sent for training within time, however, he has seriously submitted that their other batch mates on the same consideration were considered and were sent for training and the petitioners were left out except petitioners No.6, 9, 10, and 14. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1788 Const. P. 1038/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Usama Qadir and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1789 Const. P. 645/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Imran & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1380/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Imran and others,C.P.5123/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Imran and others,C.P.1208-K/2022 Imran & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Federal Secretary Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources Government of Pakistan Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
1790 Const. P. 343/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Akhtar Peer Sarhandi (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer Provincial Highways Dadu (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1791 Const. P. 1041/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 Yes regularization Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1792 Const. P. 2191/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saeed Akhter (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-21 Yes Primarily, this petition has served its purpose, which is disposed of in the terms, whereby the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to issue posting and transfer orders of the petitioner and the private respondent, if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against them, strictly under the schedule of the establishment of law department KMC, with correct description/designation of their respective posts as per their entitlement under the law. The said exercise shall be undertaken within two weeks from the date of this order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1793 Const. P. 4485/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ashfaq Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-21 Yes the major penalty of removal from service--we are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the final decision against the Petitioners has yet to be taken by the respondents afresh, and the petitioners will have an opportunity of hearing before impugned final action, if any, is taken against them by the Competent Authority of respondent-Pakistan Railways Karachi. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1794 Const. P. 7999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2933/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.474/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
1795 Const. P. 3803/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Suhaila Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAY-21 Yes whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of her previous service rendered with effect from 1971 till her reinstatement/re-employment in the year 1990 or not? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4282/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another,C.A.1423/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation thr. its Chief Human Resource Officer, Karachi and others v. Sohaila Hussain and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed
1796 Const. P. 882/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Hameed & others (Petitioner) VS IV Addl DJ Hyd and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1797 Const. P. 1644/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Nawaz Murad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1798 Const. P. 907/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Roshan Ali (Petitioner) VS Nazim Taluka Municipal Administration Samaro & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1799 Cr.Misc. 606/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD RIAZ (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL TANDO ALLAHYAR & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1800 Const. P. 365/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Waqas & anothers (Petitioner) VS NAB & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1801 Cr.Bail 517/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Sharif (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1802 Const. P. 1174/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sikandar Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1803 Const. P. 1706/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1804 Criminal Appeal 123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: conf:Case No D 23 of 2019 2019 Hassan Alias Ali HASSAN (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-21 Yes The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1805 Const. P. 1393/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Asif Raza &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1806 Const. P. 1478/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst Hanifa Karim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.158-K/2022 Mst. Hanifa Karim & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1807 Cr.Bail 2447/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAIKH FAREED S/O SHAIKH YOUSUF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1808 Const. P. 694/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mohammad Junaid (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1809 Const. P. 698/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1810 Const. P. 707/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1811 I. A 3/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Mir Kashif Ali and others (Appellant) VS Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah and another (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1812 M.A. 35/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Hassan Shah (Appellant) VS Deputy Commissioner Matiari & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1813 Civil Revision 13/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (Applicant) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1814 Const. P. 427/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Arsalan Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1815 Const. P. 96/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C. P. No. D- 06 of 2020 [Muhammad Asif & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C. P. No. D- 96 of 2020 [Abdul Rasheed & another vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-111 of 2020 [Muhammad Anwar vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-126 of 2020 [Nizamuddin & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] C.P. No. D-244 of 2020 [Wali Muhammad & others vs. Province of Sindh & others] 2020 Abdul Rasheed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.4725/2021 Shahi Khan Jagirani v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Health Department, Larkana and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1816 Cr.Bail 2424/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Daro Khan S/o Naseer Ahmed Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes The proposal seems to be plausible and exceeded to, therefore, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed. Resultantly, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within four (4) months. In case the trial is not concluded, within the stipulated period, the Applicant will be at liberty to move fresh Bail Application before the learned Trial Court on fresh ground if any and the learned trial Court shall decide the same on merit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1817 Cr.Bail 2221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 REHAN NADIR ALI S/O NADIR ALI BAIG (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in F.I.R No.1401/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1818 Const. P. 1757/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Herlal and others (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1819 Civil Revision 249/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Hassan & Ors (Applicant) VS Yousuf & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1820 M.A. 46/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Idress Rajput (Appellant) VS Learned 8th Addl: District Judge Hyderabad & other (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1821 Const. P. 762/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Riaz Ahmed Rajput (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1822 Const. P. 2382/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Attaullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federal Secretary Ministry of Water and Power dev.... (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1823 R.A (Civil Revision) 221/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Imamuddin (Applicant) VS Abdul Jabbar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1824 Criminal Miscelleneous 793/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ABDUL GHANI S/O SOOBAL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes the learned judge directed the police to register a case against the applicant-son under the Protection of Parents Ordinance 2021 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.688/2022 Ahmad Jahanzaib & others v. Mian Arshad Ali Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1825 Const. P. 2724/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Sattar Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1826 Const. P. 730/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Aadil (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1827 Const. P. 793/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rafsan Jani (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1828 Const. P. 696/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Jan-e-Alam (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1829 Const. P. 746/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Dawar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1830 Const. P. 198/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Qurban & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1831 Const. P. 845/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1832 Const. P. 1167/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Jalaluddin Khawaja (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1833 Const. P. 914/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Pir Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1834 Const. P. 437/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Hawa & Ors (Petitioner) VS National Highway Authority & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1835 Const. P. 710/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1836 Const. P. 361/2005 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2005 Mehran Oils (Pvt) Limited (Petitioner) VS The Commissioner (Hyderabad) (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1837 Const. P. 1163/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Altaf Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1838 Const. P. 692/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Bheerji (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1839 Const. P. 254/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1840 Const. P. 726/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Azhar Ali (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1841 Const. P. 1857/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Kulsoom (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 Yes official accommodation Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.68-K/2022 Mst.Kulsoom v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Railways & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1842 Cr.Bail 807/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 RIAZ HUSSAIN @ MORE (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1843 Const. P. 1261/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shamshad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 Yes It is well-settled that conversion of an amenity plot into any other purpose is illegal and encroachment thereon cannot be allowed under any circumstances. This view is fortified by the following authorities of Honble Supreme Court and cases decided by learned Division Benches of this Court, laying down the principles regarding illegal conversion and use of amenity plots/public properties for other purposes, rights of public in respect of amenity plots/public properties and duties of authorities concerned for maintaining the status of amenity plots/public properties Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
1844 Const. P. 63/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Amin & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
1845 Const. P. 764/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1846 Const. P. 629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Amanullah Brohi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1847 Const. P. 1227/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Imran Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1848 Const. P. 1780/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.398/2022 Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood Iraqi v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri and others,C.P.394-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
1849 Const. P. 1052/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arshad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1850 Const. P. 2994/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS M/s Younus Silk and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1851 Const. P. 6752/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mukhtar Ahmed Mangia (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1852 Const. P. 1466/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Asghar Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1853 Const. P. 2796/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1717/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1854 Const. P. 4329/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ullab Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1855 Const. P. 2423/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Munawar Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1856 Const. P. 2161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kamal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.568-K/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Government of Pakistan & others v. Kamal Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
1857 Const. P. 5504/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zuhaib Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Sindh Serices Tribunal (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 Yes we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.832-K/2022 Zuhaib Hussain Soomro v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Disposed of [ Remanded to SST ]
1858 Const. P. 1906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pasban Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-OCT-21 No Quota system Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1859 Const. P. 8804/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Karim Mombani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1860 M.A. 43/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Dahu Mal & ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1861 Const. P. 86/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Rasool Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1862 Const. P. 5450/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Dadex & Eternit Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1863 Const. P. 6645/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Matloob Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1724/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. Matloob Tahir & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1864 Const. P. 2850/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahabuddin and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1302/2022 Shahabuddin Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1865 Const. P. 795/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1866 Const. P. 898/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Nawab Hussain Ali Leghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1867 Const. P. 2122/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Artistic Millinners Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1868 M.A. 42/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Ramesh Kumar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1869 Const. P. 128/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asad Ali Laghari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1870 Const. P. 3982/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Qadeer Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1328/2022 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited through its President, Islamabad and others v. Syed Qadeer Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1871 M.A. 47/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Dhevji Mal & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1872 Const. P. 2084/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Agility Logistics Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.69/2022 Agility Logistics Private Limited Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1873 Const. P. 3314/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1722/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1874 Const. P. 6114/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sohail Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1875 Const. P. 7321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Hyder (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.552-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Ali Hyder Mallah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1876 Const. P. 4275/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Latif and ORs (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
1877 Const. P. 3153/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yasir Ali Baloch and Others (Petitioner) VS Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.931-K/2022 The Managing Director, Sindh Technical Education & Vocational Training Authority (STEVTA) v. Yasir Ali Baloch & another,C.P.1281-K/2022 Yasir Ali Baloch & another v. The Administrative Secretary STEVTA & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
1878 Const. P. 1721/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Qadir Otho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.327/2022 Ghulam Qadir Otho v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1879 Const. P. 7663/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shafqat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1880 Const. P. 3395/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amin ur Rasheed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1881 Const. P. 7212/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Union Textile Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1882 Const. P. 3525/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Rida Ashraf and Others (Petitioner) VS KMC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1883 Const. P. 4212/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Gulzar Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1884 Const. P. 1629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Channesar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1885 Const. P. 427/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Samreen & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1886 Const. P. 580/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zahidan @ Zehran & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1887 Const. P. 270/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Khalidan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1888 Const. P. 450/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Reena & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1889 Const. P. 770/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sht. Jaimala @ Divya & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1890 Const. P. 806/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Qudoos & others (Petitioner) VS Sikandar Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1891 Const. P. 512/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1892 Const. P. 553/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 MST Benazir (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1893 Const. P. 421/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Moomal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1894 Const. P. 479/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Murtaza Mallah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1895 Const. P. 387/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr. Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1896 Const. P. 807/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Balo Kolhi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1897 Const. P. 277/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Javed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1898 Const. P. 136/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mahesh Kumar & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1899 Criminal Appeal 4/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Majeed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1900 Const. P. 582/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Iqra & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1901 Criminal Appeal 70/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Nawaz @ Nawaz (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1902 Const. P. 593/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.93-K/2022 The State through Prosecutor General Sindh v. Hameed Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1903 R.A (Civil Revision) 130/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Anwar (Applicant) VS Mst. kalsoom Kausar & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1904 Const. P. 669/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Qamaruddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4269/2022 Qamaruddin through attorney Kamran Ali v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1905 Const. P. 1287/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1906 Const. P. 106/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Nusrat and another (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1907 Const. P. 329/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Ashfaque Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Sindh Samal Industies Copration & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3726/2022 Mohammad Ashfaq Qureshi v. Sindh Small Industries Corporation , Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1908 Const. P. 498/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1909 Const. P. 6587/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Zahoori (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1910 Const. P. 39/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Complain Cell Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1911 Const. P. 364/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Zaibu (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1912 Const. P. 614/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1913 Const. P. 2995/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ghulam Asghar Brohi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2269/2022 Ghulam Asghar Brohi v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1914 Const. P. 261/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sharimati Janki (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1915 Cr.Misc. 204/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Nil (Applicant) VS Nil (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1916 Const. P. 241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Abdul Hafeez (Petitioner) VS District Education Officer District Larkana (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1917 Cr.Rev 19/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Jabbar (Applicant) VS Mukhtikar Taluka Jando (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1918 Const. P. 771/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1919 Cr.Bail 2/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Niaz Hussain Jeho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1920 Const. P. 730/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muhammad Umar Buriro (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1921 R.A (Civil Revision) 30/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Syed Miran Muhammad Shah (Applicant) VS Syed Maqsood ul Bari & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1922 Const. P. 502/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Asma (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.28-K/2023 Asif Ali v. Mst. Asma & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
1923 R.A (Civil Revision) 202/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dilawar & Another. (Applicant) VS Mst. Tahira Bibi & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1924 I. A 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Umair (Appellant) VS Zulfiqar Ail Shaikh & another. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-AUG-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1925 Const. P. 790/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Faiza & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1926 Const. P. 4354/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Nadeem Alam (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1927 Const. P. 166/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Irfana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1928 Const. P. 606/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Nazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1929 Const. P. 90/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Kausar Adeel & another (Petitioner) VS D.I.G Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1930 Const. P. 150/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Hamna Mujahid & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1931 Const. P. 523/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Malik Ishtiaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1932 Const. P. 203/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rasool Bux & another (Petitioner) VS Ashique & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1933 Criminal Miscelleneous 386/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Qadir and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1934 Const. P. 113/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Zainab @ Preemi & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1935 Const. P. 971/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS V.C QUEST& Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3267/2022 The Vice Chancellor, Quaid-e-Awam University, Nawabshah and others v. Ali Asghar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
1936 I. A 50/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Akber Zaman Shah (Appellant) VS Anwar Ali Khaskheli (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1937 Const. P. 591/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Nazia (Petitioner) VS Asad Ali & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1471-K/2022 Asad Ali v. Mst.Nazia & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
1938 Const. P. 715/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Saiqa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1939 Criminal Miscelleneous 604/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Arif (Applicant) VS Riaz Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1940 Const. P. 327/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Kanwal & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1941 R.A (Civil Revision) 176/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Ghulam Sabir and other (Applicant) VS Govt of Pakistan and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1942 Const. P. 5634/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 Yes The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2147/2023 Trustees of the Karachi Port, through its Board of Trustees, KPT, Karachi v. Habib ur Rehman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned.to be fixed before 3 member bench
1943 Const. P. 3541/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ali Sher and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1944 Const. P. 7976/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 HRDO (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1945 Const. P. 4979/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hadi Bux Zardari (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1946 Const. P. 445/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Jameela & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1947 II.A. 16/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Pir Shahab Ghous Shah (Appellant) VS M/S Matiari Sugar Mills Ltd (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1948 Const. P. 229/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Tehreem & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1949 II.A. 29/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Farah Naz & another (Appellant) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1950 Const. P. 6061/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Azra Parveen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes up-gradation and promotion issue in NICH Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1951 Cr.Acq.A. 104/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Bilawal (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1952 Const. P. 565/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Misbah & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1953 Const. P. 684/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Hassan and others (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
1954 Const. P. 2337/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Telenor Microfinance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1955 Const. P. 154/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Atteque Rehman Khuharo (Petitioner) VS The Chairman Sindh Higher Education Com. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1956 Const. P. 783/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Abbas Unar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & other (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4317/2022 M/s Hashoo (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Culture, Tourism and Antiquities, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1957 Const. P. 753/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Jawaid Moten (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khair un Nisa & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1958 Const. P. 273/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Inspector Rukhsana Leghari and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1959 Const. P. 472/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Aijaz Hussain Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1960 Const. P. 559/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dost Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1961 Const. P. 18/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Deen Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS SSP S.B.A and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1962 Const. P. 540/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Najma & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1963 H.C.A 337/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Raza Elahi & Others (Appellant) VS Mrs. Mariam Kamran & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1179/2023 Raza Elahi and others v. Marium Kamran and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
1964 Const. P. 2846/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Munawar Khurshid (Petitioner) VS G.M (Phs) PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1965 Const. P. 5043/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Allah Bux Soomro (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1229/2023 General Manager, MCB Bank Ltd Sukkur v. Allah Bux Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
1966 Cr.Bail 7/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muhammad Akbar Arain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
1967 Const. P. 6939/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1968 Const. P. 6871/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Misbah ul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1969 Const. P. 114/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Aroba (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1970 Criminal Miscelleneous 184/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 PHELAJ & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1971 Const. P. 1238/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SESSI Staff Union Sindh (Petitioner) VS Registrar Trade Union and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1972 R.A (Civil Revision) 9/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Irfan Ali and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Tasleem and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 20-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1973 Const. P. 828/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Abdul Qadir Khoso & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-23 Yes No benefit can be claimed of a consent order in respect of another party even passed by the Supreme Court. The same is not covered by the dicta laid down in the case of Hameed Akhtar Niazi (1996 SCMR 1185) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1974 Cr.Bail 1913/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1975 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1213/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 1214 of 2023 2023 The Collector of Customs, Karachi (Applicant) VS M/s. Taj Gasoline (Pvt) Ltd., Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-JAN-24 Yes Finding of fact recorded by Tribunal cannot be interfered with under Section 196 of the Customs Act Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1976 Cr.Rev 115/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED ALY MUHAMMAD ZAIDI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1977 Cr.Rev 149/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 IRFAN MUSTAFA S/O IRSHAD (Applicant) VS ABDUL QAYYUM & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1978 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 650/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA NO. 651 TO 680 / 2022 2022 The D. G. Customs Valuation, Karachi & another (Applicant) VS M/s. Seven Star Tyre, Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
1979 Const. P. 410/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Rehana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1980 Const. P. 676/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s Karachi Shipyard & Engineering (Petitioner) VS SLAT & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-24 Yes In principle cases in Courts are decided on the preponderance of evidence led in the case by the parties, and to reach a just and proper conclusion, the oral as well as the documentary evidence needs to be taken into consideration. But at the same time, when the matter comes to this Court in Constitutional Jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, it is not the domain of this Court to re-weigh or interpret the evidence and /or material produced before the forums below as this Court is not Appellate Court and under the Constitutional jurisdiction, this Court has limited jurisdiction until and unless the findings are shown to be perverse with jurisdictional defect. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1981 Criminal Miscelleneous 8/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MAJOR (R) SANWAL KHAN SOLANGI (Applicant) VS PERVAIZ ARSHAD CHAUDHRY (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1982 Cr.Bail 2779/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL WAHID S/O HATIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1983 Const. P. 4216/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Habib Nasir Siddiqui and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAR-24 Yes Touching to the last proposition, it is well-settled law that a legislative act to nullify a judgment, without taking away its basis, is an impermissible exercise. Whereas in the present case, this Court in the case of Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and 28 others as discussed supra, directed the Competent Authority for inclusion of Orderly Allowance in pensionable; emoluments of the petitioners under law and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan, in the above-referred matter, as well as the observation made in the preceding paragraphs, however the respondent CAA without taking away the basis of the order omitted sub-regulation 10 of Regulation 46, which exercise amounts to nullify the effect of the order, which is not permissible under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1984 Cr.Bail 2069/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD SOHAIL KHAN @ ADNAN @ SHINA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1985 Election Appeal 39/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Rauf Ahmed S/o Muhammad Ismail (Appellant) VS The Returning Officer PS-108 Khi South III and Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1986 Cr.Acq.A. 606/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MALIK FURQAN AHMED (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOHTER (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1987 Cr.Bail 1141/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 TALHA @ JAHANGIR S/O DAD MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1988 Cr.Bail 1713/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AMIR S/O ABDUL HAMEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1989 Criminal Miscelleneous 654/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 NAQIBULLAH S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1990 Criminal Miscelleneous 764/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASADULLAH KHAN S/O ALLAH YAR KHAN &ANOHTER (Applicant) VS REHMATULLAH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1991 Cr.Bail 2155/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 PIR BUX S/O JHANDO KHAN & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1992 Cr.Bail 1490/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASADULLAH S/O TAQI MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1993 Const. P. 3358/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ms. Sidra Rehmat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1994 Election Appeal 229/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Faizan Hussain S/o Muhammad Hussain (Appellant) VS The RO PS-117 Khi West and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1995 Election Appeal 237/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Imtiaz Ahmed S/o Muhammad Rafiq Jokhio (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1996 Election Appeal 155/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Anwar Khan Tareen (Appellant) VS RO NA-242 Keamari and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1997 Election Appeal 195/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Waqar Ahmed S/o Syed Khursheed Ali (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1998 Cr.Bail 2258/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHAIKH GHULAM MURTAZA ADV (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1999 Cr.Bail 2017/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL MAJEED S/O ABDUL GHANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2000 Cr.Bail 1838/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAMSULLAH S/O GHULAM QADIR SHAIKH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2001 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 450/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 451 OF 2022 2022 Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Kar. (Applicant) VS Saleem of M/s. Rana Ishtiaq Goods,Karachi & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2002 Const. P. 4372/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Adil Ishrat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2003 Cr.Bail 1455/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MST. MUMLIKAT W/O SIDDIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2004 Cr.Acq.A. 586/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MUHAMMAD ZOHAIB QAYYUM S/O ABDUL QAYYUM (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH (P.G SINDH) & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2005 I. A 66/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Umer Farooque. (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shafique. (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2006 Criminal Miscelleneous 401/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MANOJ KUMAR AHUJA THR ATTORNEY JOTI SARUP AHUJA (Applicant) VS IIND JM KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2007 Cr.Bail 1638/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAMRAIZ S/O ALLAH WASAYA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2008 Const. P. 5975/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Raees (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2009 Const. P. 1139/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Paras D/o Basheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2010 Const. P. 8480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Hayat Kimya Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-24 Yes Fire Fighting Equipment is equipment as defined in SRO SRO 41(I)/2009 and SRO 1097(1)/2012: entitled for exemption Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2011 Cr.Bail 1732/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BASHEER S/O MUHAMMAD YAMEEN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2012 Cr.Bail 1239/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAH MEER S/O SHAHID KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2013 Criminal Miscelleneous 124/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MST. SAKINA D/O GHULAM ABBAS (Applicant) VS SSP MALIR KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2014 Election Appeal 97/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ms. Rafia Ahsan W/o Ahsan Alvi (Appellant) VS RO PS-126 Khi Central and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2015 Cr.Bail 2393/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ESSA S/O IBRAHIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2016 Cr.Bail 2808/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED FARJAD ALI S/O SYED ANWAR ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2017 Election Appeal 162/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Mumtaz Ali Shah S/o Syed Qurban Ali Shah (Appellant) VS RO NA-212 Mirpurkhas-II and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2018 Election Appeal 69/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arbab Muhammad Din Memon S/o Shamsuddin Memon (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan and Anothe (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2019 Election Appeal 247/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Farooq S/o Muhammad Ashraf (Appellant) VS RO PS-96 Korangi VIII and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2020 Criminal Miscelleneous 23/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Applicant) VS ASIF ALI MEMON (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2021 Election Appeal 256/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Abdul Hakeem S/o Agha Khan (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2022 Election Appeal 219/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Alif Zar S/o Dilbar (Appellant) VS The RO PS-116 Khi West-I and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2023 Cr.Bail 1279/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JAVED @ QADIR BUX S/O MUHAMMAD MURAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2024 Cr.Tran 75/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AZIZULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2025 Cr.Bail 1892/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Farhan Khan S/o Abdul Haq & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2026 Cr.Bail 607/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HAFIZ MUDDASSAR JAWAID (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.1093/2023 Hafiz Mudassar Javaid v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2027 Cr.Bail 1312/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABID ALI S/O ORANGZEB & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2028 Cr.Acq.A. 491/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Faisal Lakhani Thr. Shafqat Ahmed (Appellant) VS The Learned XIIth ADJ, Karachi East & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2029 Cr.Bail 1690/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED MAZHAR ALI SHAH GILLANI & ANTOHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2030 Cr.Bail 1581/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAHRYAR @ RAZA S/O DEEN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2031 Criminal Miscelleneous 427/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ARSHAD ALI S/O MOUJ ALI (Applicant) VS THE XITH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2032 Cr.Bail 1756/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAHZAIB S/O GHULAM NABI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2033 Criminal Miscelleneous 621/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MST. FARINA MOID W/O OWAISUDDIN AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2034 Cr.Acq.A. 130/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Khamoon (Appellant) VS Zahid and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2035 Const. P. 1299/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mujahid Ali Lund (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-24 Yes Perusal of the substituted Rule 10-A reflects that with widening its scope, certain conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died during service whereas the substituted rule included the children of the civil servant who were declared invalidated or incapacitated for further service and the post against which such category of persons could be appointed, was curtailed to BS-16-17 only instead of BS 11-20. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2036 Const. P. 1211/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Shrimati Seeta & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2037 Const. P. 1034/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Siddique Ujjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2038 Const. P. 133/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Jabbar @ Papu (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2039 Const. P. 650/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Nasir Khan & others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2040 Criminal Miscelleneous 331/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst. Bibi Farzana Shah (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2041 Criminal Miscelleneous 138/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Shamshad Ali (Applicant) VS SHO PS Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2042 Const. P. 824/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Shagan Lal (Petitioner) VS Ex. Engr. HESCO & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2043 Spl. Cr. A. 34/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mumtaz Ali Bapar (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
2044 Cr.Acq.A. 59/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Habibullah (Appellant) VS Mst. Zareena & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-24 No The scope of interference in an appeal against acquittal is very narrow and limited. This is because the presumption of innocence is strengthened in acquittal cases, meaning the accused is considered innocent until proven guilty. Courts are hesitant to interfere with acquittal judgments unless they are wrong, violate the law, or are based on serious errors in interpreting or understanding the evidence. Such judgments should not be overturned lightly, and the prosecution has a heavy burden to prove that the accused is guilty despite the acquittal. Interference in an acquittal judgment is rare, and the prosecution must demonstrate that the court made glaring errors of law or fact that led to a grave miscarriage of justice. The acquittal judgment must be perfunctory, artificial, or based on a shocking conclusion. The appellate court should not interfere simply because it could reach a different conclusion by re-evaluating the evidence. Factual conclusions should only be overturned if they are wrong or suffer from serious factual flaws. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2045 Criminal Miscelleneous 422/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Chehno (Applicant) VS The state & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2046 Const. P. 699/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Meer Khan mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2047 Const. P. 1168/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2048 Const. P. 109/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Agha Irfan Ali & others (Petitioner) VS POS & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2049 Const. P. 456/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Wahab & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2050 Const. P. 1285/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Sarfaraz Ahmed Kolachi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 No We have noticed that there are so many petitions coming up on the subject issue, therefore, it would be appropriate to dilate upon such issue once for all. It appears that the Government of Sindh while exercising power conferred under section 26 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, amended Rules 10 and 11 of the Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the appointment rules, 1974') which provided for initial appointments to the posts in Grade 16 to 22 through Public Service Commission and Grade 3 to 15 on the recommendations of Departmental Selection Committee by introducing Rules 10-A and 11-A respectively. To go ahead further, initially, the Supreme Court has interpreted the law on the subject issue and held that Rule 10-A was inserted in the appointment Rules, 1974 on 2.9.2002, and thereafter it was substituted and amended thrice; firstly on 15.10.2008, second on 30.7.2011, and finally on 16th of September, 2014. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2051 Const. P. 1001/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes Learned Assistant A.G Sindh has resisted these petitions on the premise that there are disputed questions of facts involved in the matters, as such these petitions cannot be entertained. At this stage, we confronted him with the proposition that the issue of the salary of the petitioners, if any needs to be resolved at the end of the respondents' departments and this Court cannot decide the subject issue under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. However, at the same time, if the petitioners are working with the Government Departments, their salary issue must be resolved within a reasonable time, as this issue cannot be left unattended for an indefinite period. Learned A.A.G without filing comments, though notices have been issued to the respondents to put their defense, they failed to do so for the reason best known to him, submit that these matters are required to be resolved by the competent authority of the respondents if the cause of the petitioners still subsists. The proposal seems to be reasonable. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2052 Criminal Miscelleneous 512/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Khan & others (Applicant) VS SSP Tharparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-OCT-24 Yes Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 561-A Cr.P.C assailing order dated 30-08-2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II/ Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, Tharparkar @ Mithi, in Criminal Miscellaneous application No.493/2024, whereby application under section 22-A & B Cr.P.C filed by the respondent No.3 was allowed with direction to the S.H.O concerned to record statement of the respondent/complainant and same be incorporated in 154 Cr.P.C book, if it constitutes a cognizable offence. 2. Learned counsel submits that F.I.R No.28/2024 under sections 393, 506(2), 504, 114, 34 P.P.C has already been registered at PS Kaloi District Tharparkar on 31-08-2024 against the applicants; therefore, the purpose of filing this Crl. Misc. Application has become infructuous. However, he insists that he will pursue his remedy as per law. 3. In view of above interim order passed by this court vide order dated 04-09-2024 is hereby re-called and this Crl. Miscellaneous Application is disposed of as FIR No. 28/2024 of PS Kaloi District Tharparkar has already been registered. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2053 Const. P. 1053/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2054 Const. P. 817/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Nisar Ahmed malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2055 Criminal Miscelleneous 640/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 KARIM BUX JOKHIO @ JAVED & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-24 Yes We have noticed that the Judicial Magistrate has been conferred with wide powers to take cognizance of an offense not only when he receives information about the commission of offense from a third person but also when he has knowledge or even suspicion that the offense has been committed. The Magistrate has the power to independently review a police report, even if it concludes that no offense was committed. They can disagree with the police's opinion and take cognizance of the offense, ordering further investigation or issuing process to the accused. The Magistrate's decision is based on their assessment of the facts, not solely on the police's opinion. The terms "charge sheet" and "final report" are not formally defined in the Code. However, they are commonly used in police rules to refer to reports filed under Section 170 Cr.P.C. Reports filed under Section 169, where there's insufficient evidence, are often termed "referred charge," "final report," or "summary." 16. In view of the above we, therefore, dispose of these Criminal Miscellaneous Applications along with the pending application(s), with direction to the trial court to proceed with the matter, frame the charge, and culminate the Criminal proceedings in its logical conclusion within a reasonable time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2056 Const. P. 1760/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Hunain Raz Ansari (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2057 Const. P. 1556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Gulshan Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2058 Const. P. 1382/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mureed Abbas Mirjat (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2059 Spl. Cr. A. 63/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Nabi Bux @ Bijli Zardari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
2060 Const. P. 1807/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Taimoor Ali Khoso (Petitioner) VS M/S Continental Biscuit Ltd Sukkur & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 No At the outset, we note that both section 2(ix) of the SIRA and section 2(x) of the Industrial Relation Act,2012 (IRA) define an ???establishment??? to mean any office, firm, factory, society, undertaking, company, shop, or enterprise which employees workmen ???directly or through a contractor??? to carry on business or industry. Again, section 2(xxxii) of the SIRA and section 2(xxxiii) of the IRA define ???worker??? and ???workman??? as a person who is employed in an establishment or industry ???either directly or through a contractor ??????. Further, section 2(xxxii) IRA defines ???trans-provincial??? to mean ???any establishment, group of establishments, industry, having its branches in more than one province???. In Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. v. Member NIRC (2014 SCMR 535), the Supreme Court held that once it was established through any means that the employer was a trans-provincial establishment, then the IRA, being Federal law, would become applicable to such establishment, and under Article 143 of the Constitution, the provincial industrial relations law would be overridden. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2061 Const. P. 508/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Nadir Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2062 Const. P. 555/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Kashif Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2063 Const. P. 202/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Raza Rabbani @ Sarang Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2064 Const. P. 1206/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Muhammad Azeem Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2065 Const. P. 369/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Babar Ali Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Chairman FPSC & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
2066 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 83/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 PARVEZ S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2067 Const. P. 616/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Tahir & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2068 Const. P. 2040/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Hafeez Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2069 Const. P. 403/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Gul Sher Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes This Court reemphasizes the importance of the structured exercise of discretionary powers in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. The discretion given through the policy is not structured one and, therefore, is not being exercised transparently. The equality clause is being offended; because the price, higher than the market price, to purchase wheat crop is a privilege offered, yet several equally placed farmers/growers are not given a single bag. Notwithstanding the facts, that the policy is not only capable of being applied discriminately and discretionary powers are being used in a non-transparent manner; this Court is constrained not to strike down the policy, in the presence of the fact that the crop is lying under sky in open field and the delay in its collection shall cause loss of crop, which is national asset, but the grower shall also suffer as they shall be left on the mercy of investors who shall at liberty to determine forced sale price under compelling circumstances. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2070 Const. P. 403/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Gul Sher Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2071 Const. P. 415/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zafarullah Bullo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2072 Const. P. 535/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2073 Const. P. 142/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Azizullah Memon & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2074 Const. P. 1725/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Wahab Ansari (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2075 Const. P. 515/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Imdad Ali Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2076 Criminal Miscelleneous 198/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Asadullah Almani (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2077 Cr.Bail 2483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD FAROOQ S/O ADUL WAHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-24 Yes Bail can be denied in cases involving fraud, forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy if the prosecution can establish a strong prima facie case against the accused. In the present case, the learned counsel for the applicant has been unable to explain why the applicant has been a beneficiary of Rs. 2200,000/- credited into his account No. 1286-0221929371001739 from the account of his brother Abdul Latif Sheikh (co-accused). The learned counsel although submitted the said payment was the internal transaction between two brothers i.e. Abdul Latif and the applicant, yet remained unable to explain the nature of the said transaction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2078 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 35/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 WASEEM ABBASS & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2079 Const. P. 665/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Iqbal Hussain Otho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2080 Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-24 Yes Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority. The regularization of the petitioners shall be considered from the date of their regularization. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Deputy Director Food Faisalabad Division, Faisalabad, etc. vs Muhammad Tauqir Shah and others vide order dated 10.03.2021passed in C.P.43-L/2021 to C.P.58-L/2021. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2081 Const. P. 1056/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Adnan Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2082 Const. P. 119/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Anwaruddin Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2083 Const. P. 268/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Rajib Ali Jogi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2084 Const. P. 995/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Kiran & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JUL-24 No Further, per Section 271 and 272 of Mulla???s Principles of Muhammadan Law a marriage of a minor (who has not attained puberty) is not invalid for the simple reason that it was brought about by the father or grand-father and continues to be valid unless same is repudiated by that girl before attaining the age of 18 years. Therefore, such act of the father and grandfather is protected by Muslim Laws unless the same is established or proved to be in manifest disadvantage of the minor. Besides, Section 273 of the Mulla???s Principles of Muhammadan Law, provides that the marriage brought about by other guardians is also not invalid unless she, resorted to her operation to repudiate the marriage on attaining puberty. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2085 Const. P. 1395/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Asim Sami Khan Pathan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2086 Const. P. 513/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Amjad Ali Bhatii (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2087 Const. P. 1690/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muhammad yousuf Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Learned District Judge Sukkur & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
2088 Const. P. 514/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Jabir Ali Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2089 Const. P. 1674/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Raza laghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2090 Const. P. 233/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Munawar Hussain Mangrio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2091 Const. P. 749/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Nirmal John (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2092 Const. P. 739/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Bagh s/o Allahwassayo (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2093 Criminal Miscelleneous 15/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mushtaque Ali Khoso (Appellant) VS The State & (04) Ors (Opponent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2094 Const. P. 8/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Ghulam Mustafa Mallah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
2095 Const. P. 614/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2096 Const. P. 321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Shafique Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2097 Cr.Bail 2633/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD SALEEM S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-DEC-24 Yes It appears from the record that the applicant is not nominated in the FIR and no recovery has been effected from his possession. The only allegation against the applicant that facilitated the co-accused who had named him in the present crime, this factum was recorded by the trial court in the order. The alleged extra-judicial confession of co-accused made before police, if any, is not admissible under Articles 38 and 39 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, that no confession made to a police officer shall be proved as against a person accused of any offence, while Article 39 emphasizes that, subject to Article 40, no confession made by any person whilst he is in the custody of a police officer, unless it be made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, shall be proved as against such person. Seemingly, a confession made before the police is not made admissible by dint of the aforesaid provisions of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order 1984 in order to preserve and safeguard the philosophy of safe administration of criminal justice and is also based on public policy. In the aforesaid backdrop, I am sanguine that the case of applicant requires further inquiry to prove his guilt which can only be thrashed out after recording of evidence in the trial Court. On the aforesaid proposition I am guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ikram-ul-Haq v Raja Naveed Sabir & others (2012 SCMR 1273). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2098 Const. P. 538/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Douro Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2099 Cr.Bail 104/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Hayat & another (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2100 Const. P. 454/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Amjad Arain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2101 Const. P. 1125/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Nabi Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes In principle, salary and arrears including reinstatement/regularization of service of the petitioners if any, be determined by departmental heads as discussed supra and if the petitioners are working for longer periods then the issue of their regularization of service be taken care of, if the law permits; however, the services of petitioners have already been dispensed with, such factum must be disclosed in the findings after hearing the parties. 10. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court seeks guidance from a Supreme Court judgment in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], regarding departmental determinations. The judgment states that departments should fairly determine employees' eligibility and take appropriate action, including the issue of the salary if they are validly appointed to the subject posts as pointed out by the petitioners in their pleadings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2102 Const. P. 1157/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Ghulam Sarwar Chang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2103 Const. P. 1070/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Arif Masood Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-24 No Whether a Claim for Statutory Group Life Insurance would be treated as a pension Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
2104 Const. P. 4690/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Advocate Ashfaque Ali Panhwar & another (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2105 Const. P. 570/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Alam Shar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2106 Const. P. 1822/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sadaruddin Mirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2107 Const. P. 737/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Samano (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2108 Const. P. 1417/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Abdul Samad Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2109 Const. P. 1737/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mst Tehmina (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2110 Const. P. 383/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Azam Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2111 Cr.Bail 871/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHAHZAD JUNAID S/O ROSHAN ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-24 Yes Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years , broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: - (b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2112 Cr.Bail 1304/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 AYAZULLAH S/O SYED UMER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-24 Yes A bare perusal of the aforementioned provisions of law demonstrates that the same is applicable in the class of persons, who trade in such stolen articles known as receivers as the complainant has failed to recognize the applicant. Primarily, a person, immediately, after theft found to be in possession of the stolen property, the presumption would be that either he is a thief or in possession of goods with knowledge that those are stolen. Mere possession of the stolen property is not sufficient to constitute an offense under the aforementioned provisions rather in addition it has to be established that the person in possession of the stolen property had dishonestly received or retained the property knowing or having the reasons to believe the same to be stolen. The onus is always on the part of the prosecution to prove the essential elements of the offense. In case of failure on the part of the prosecution to prove the basic ingredients i.e. receipt or retention of property belonging to someone else, the property being stolen, the existence of knowledge or belief on the part of the person found in possession, and the receipt and retention as dishonest, no bail can be refused as in such circumstances it is well settled that no conviction can be awarded on such analogy. The prosecution to establish an offense under the aforesaid section, must not only prove that the property is stolen, but it must also be established that the person charged with having stolen property either knows the property to be stolen or has reasonable grounds for believing the same to be stolen. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2113 Criminal Appeal 815/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 THE STATE / ANF (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD JAVEED (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-24 Yes The prosecution wanted to summon PW HC Muhammad Naeem Moharrar of Malkhana In-charge to re-examine him about handing over the sample parcel to the parcel witness. The trial court denied the request, on the premise that he was already examined on oath and his cross-examination had been conducted and now the prosecution wants to fill the lacuna. The reasoning of the learned trial court is justiciable for the simple reason that PW 4 Muhammad Naeem had already been examined by the trial court on 14.11.2024, in which he deposed clearly and produced certain documents and he was cross-examined by the defense. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2114 Const. P. 421/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2115 Criminal Miscelleneous 934/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Lal Khan Shar (Appellant) VS Baroch son of Ghulam Mahar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2116 Const. P. 566/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Ghani Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2117 Const. P. 1571/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Mahakamuddin Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2118 Cr.Bail 264/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khalid Hussain & Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2119 Criminal Miscelleneous 58/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Nadeem Jat (Applicant) VS Manager HBL Chandi Chock (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-OCT-24 Yes It appears from the cross examination of complainant that he had made certain admissions, like he admitted that he did not produce the ownership documents of alleged plot. He also admitted that the respondent was/is his real brother and civil proceedings is pending on subject issue. He admitted that there was mobile tower installed on the disputed land and such agreement was executed between the company and the respondent. The witness of the complainant admitted that there was/is civil dispute between the parties over the plot. Such admissions on the part of complainant and his witnesses leads to believe that there were strained relations between two real brothers and registration of subject case appears to be result of such dispute. The complainant has also admitted that place of incident is located in populated area, but none from the locality came forward to corroborate the version of complainant. The complainant also admitted that previously, the respondent had lodged ???NC??? against him and such fact could not be overlooked. The Medicolegal Officer Doctor Kanwar Lal admitted in the deposition that there was/is correction in the OPD slip. He admitted that there was/is no injury upon the body and head of the complainant. He admitted that there is possibility that the present injured might have received injury by falling on tile or marble. He also admitted that on the same day, injured Jhaman appeared with the police letter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2120 Const. P. 5293/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Rabia and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-24 Yes In view of the statement of the parties, coupled with the report of the Investigation officer to the effect that the case has been recommended for C Class, therefore, the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 536 of 2024 registered for offenses under section 365-B, PPC needs to be quashed. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to, however, such order shall be passed by the Magistrate on the report submitted under section 173 Cr. P.C. within one week. 6. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2121 Criminal Miscelleneous 441/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mushtaque Hussain & another (Applicant) VS SSP Mirpurkhas & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2122 Const. P. 1210/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shahab Usto (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2123 Const. P. 407/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Allah Bachayo Mari & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes This Court reemphasizes the importance of the structured exercise of discretionary powers in terms of law laid down by the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. The discretion given through the policy is not structured one and, therefore, is not being exercised transparently. The equality clause is being offended; because the price, higher than the market price, to purchase wheat crop is a privilege offered, yet several equally placed farmers/growers are not given a single bag. Notwithstanding the facts, that the policy is not only capable of being applied discriminately and discretionary powers are being used in a non-transparent manner; this Court is constrained not to strike down the policy, in the presence of the fact that the crop is lying under sky in open field and the delay in its collection shall cause loss of crop, which is national asset, but the grower shall also suffer as they shall be left on the mercy of investors who shall at liberty to determine forced sale price under compelling circumstances. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2124 Const. P. 32/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Umair Qazi & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2125 Const. P. 1823/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Khan Muhammad Meerani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2126 Cr.Bail 1049/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 ALI HAIDER S/O JAVAID AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-24 Yes Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. for the simple reason that the complainant does not wish to prosecute the accused and makes a categorical statement through his affidavit. As such, this Court Court has left no option but to see the version of the complainant, which is a paramount consideration at the bail stage, though the offense is not compoundable, however, the version of the complainant cannot be brushed aside at this stage. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal as no record has been produced to the aforesaid effect. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lacs) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2127 Cr.Bail 201/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Akber @Akber Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-OCT-24 Yes Primarily, this is a landed dispute between two real brothers. The case has been challaned and the applicant is no more required for further investigation, but no progress has been made before the trial Court. The applicant attends the trial Court regularly. The learned counsel for the applicant claimed that the witnesses are not attending the court. The learned counsel for the complainant has failed to plead that after granting pre-arrest bail, the applicant has made any attempt to tamper with the prosecution evidence or misuse the concession of bail. In the case of Nadeem v. The State (2016 SCMR 1619); wherein the Supreme Court of Pakistan has held that: ??????3 In the absence of any evidence that the petitioner had tried to misuse the concession of bail or attempted to tamper with the prosecution evidence, it was not open for the learned High Court to recall the bail already granted to the petitioner. The learned Additional Prosecutor General has also confirmed that challan has already been submitted in the trial Court.??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2128 Const. P. 5113/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Hamid uz Zafar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-24 Yes Section 119 of the Sindh Local Government Act, 2013, primarily deals with the establishment and composition of the Provincial Local Government Commission. It outlines that the Commission shall consist of the Minister for Local Government, who serves as the Chairman, and two members of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh, nominated by the Leader of the House and the Leader of the Opposition. However, it does not explicitly address the tenure of members or the implications of the dissolution of the Provincial Assembly on their positions. Besides, Rule of the Provincial Local Government Commission (Conduct of Business) Rules, 2017, do not directly address the issue of a member's tenure or the impact of the Provincial Assembly's dissolution. It primarily outlines serving of notice and hearing before removing members. The Commission's rules do not address the salary issue for former MPAs on the Commission. As MPAs are already public servants with salaries. The court cannot decide if the former MPA can claim additional salary for their role on the Commission as the rules do not provide clear guidance on this matter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2129 Criminal Appeal 81/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Ghulam Akbar Buriro (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2130 Const. P. 647/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Lal Muhammad Magsi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2131 Cr.Bail 1043/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 RIAZ KHAN S/O MUSHAD GUL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes Since the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court directed to record or take photographs at the time of search of the accused when search, seizure, or arrest is made as the law permits the use of modern devices or techniques but the police failed and neglected to adhere the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court, which is a constitutional command under Article 199 of the Constitution, therefore, appreciating whether the applicant was arrested with charas from his trousers requires deeper appreciation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2132 Cr.Bail 1367/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD NAVEED ZAMEER S/O ZAMEERUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-24 Yes The questions involved in the present proceedings is whether the cheques in question given for surety purpose could be dishonoured, entailing the punishment under Section 489-F P.P.C. and whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2133 Const. P. 787/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 AIjaz Ali Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2134 Const. P. 6123/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Waqas Javed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-24 Yes Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2135 Cr.Bail 628/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SANIYAL ALI S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-24 Yes Coming to the proposition bail in an offense punishable up to seven years, broadly speaking a person accused of a bailable offense has a right of admission to bail and an arrested person can be refused bail if it appears to the Court concerned that "reasonable grounds" exist for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for ten years. Allegations against him are that he cheated the complainant and deprived him of his legitimate amount on the pretext that he would return the plot. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 (Act V of 1898) {Code} for bail the offenses are divided into two categories termed ???Bailable offence??? and ???Non-bailable offence???. These are defined under Section 4(b) as under: - (b) "Bail able offense, "non-bail able offence": "Bailable offence" means an offence shown as bail able in the Second Schedule or which is made bail able by any other law for the time being in force; and "non-bailable offence means any other offence??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2136 Cr.Bail 1064/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SAMEEULLAH S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS (Applicant) VS THE SATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes This Court vide order dated 05.09.2023 directed the trial Court to examine the eye witness Hammad within one month and as per record his examination in chief has been recorded and his further examination in chief needs to be recorded. Prima facie partial compliance has been made, therefore, this bail application is disposed of by directing the learned trial Court to examine the remaining witnesses within one month. In case of failure, MIT shall refer the matter to the competent authority for passing appropriate orders on the administrative side. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2137 Const. P. 816/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Shamshad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2138 Const. P. 5911/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Nasir Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-24 Yes This petition seeking reconsideration of Rules framed by the respondent department vide notification dated 23.9.2024 cannot be entertained as this Court lacks the jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution for the reasons that it lacks the expertise to dictate policy decisions/framing the rules and that such decisions are required to be made by experts in the field. 6. This petition is found to be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2139 Criminal Miscelleneous 166/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Azizullah Nangrach (Appellant) VS SHO P.S Mithiani & others (Defendant) S.B. Order 06-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2140 Cr.Bail 106/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Imtiaz and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2141 Const. P. 468/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Asif Ali Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2142 Cr.Rev 33/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mujeeb Rehman & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2143 Criminal Miscelleneous 447/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Yar Muhammad & another (Applicant) VS SSP Umerkot & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2144 Const. P. 611/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 Muhammad Islam &Ors. (Petitioner) VS The General Manager Petroman &Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2145 Const. P. 3127/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Check & Watch (Petitioner) VS V/S SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.6390/2021 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others,C.A.647/2022 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. M/s Check and Watch Environment (NGO) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
2146 2018 PLC (CS) Note 169 Const. P. 447/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Ilyas & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.45-K/2018 Muhammad Ilyas and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2147 2018 PLC Lab. Note 29 Const. P. 7339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Independent Media Corp (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Raja Tariq Mehmood and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.66-K/2018 M/s Independent Media Corporation (Pvt) Ltd and another v. Raja Tariq Mehmood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2148 2019 PLC (CS) Note 2 Const. P. 2288/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Azra Muqeem (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.322-K/2018 Khursheed Mukaram v. Ms. Azra Muqeem and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2149 Const. P. 2108/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Asim Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2150 Const. P. 1819/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2151 Const. P. 6202/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Abbas Imran Jafry (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.530-K/2017 Syed Abbas Imran Jafry v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan In Transit Dismissed
2152 2018 CLC 50 Const. P. 1456/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Zia Abbas (Petitioner) VS Mst.Mahiya and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2153 Cr.Bail 1581/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 MOHAMMAD FAROOQUE S/O HAJI FAZAL MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2154 Cr.Bail 1840/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 AGHA JAWAD S/O GHULAM JILLANI & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2155 Const. P. 1503/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Tariq Mustafa (Petitioner) VS National Insurance Corporation Limited (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2156 Const. P. 1415/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghulam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt.of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.571-K/2018 Umerdin Saand and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2157 Const. P. 902/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Ghazanfar Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2158 Const. P. 86/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Mst. Hani through LRs (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2159 Const. P. 6629/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2160 Const. P. 6629/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Khan Sahito (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2008/2019 Ahmed Nawaz Jagirani v. Imran Khan Sahito & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2161 Const. P. 3171/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Azra Parveen Butt (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2162 Const. P. 3161/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2163 Const. P. 5250/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ziauddin Sabir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2164 I. A 9/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2165 Const. P. 3355/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Taaruf Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.376-K/2019 Taaruf Hussain and others v. Province of Sindh thr.Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2166 Const. P. 561/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kazim Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2167 Const. P. 3012/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mushtaque Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2168 Const. P. 30/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Shahzia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2169 Const. P. 384/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Qazi Nazimuddin & others (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.288-K/2019 Qazi Nasimuddin v. Syed Sabit Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2170 Const. P. 861/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zulfiqar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2171 Const. P. 810/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Nek Muhammad Jakhrani & another (Petitioner) VS Chairman WAPDA & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2172 Const. P. 2216/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Khalique (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2173 Const. P. 3651/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saleem Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2174 Cr.Bail 1844/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 SHAHUL S/O PEERAL & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2175 Const. P. 3880/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mariyum Urooj (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2176 Const. P. 503/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2177 Cr.Acq.A. 63/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Muhammad Idrees Thebo (Appellant) VS Ramz Ali & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2178 Const. P. 1415/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Haji Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2179 Const. P. 244/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Peer Bux (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2180 Const. P. 803/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Metatex (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2181 Const. P. 3293/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Haji Abdul Raziq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.461-K/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: and others v. Haji Abdul Razik Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2182 Const. P. 2914/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Isra Town Housing (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2183 Const. P. 1677/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2184 Const. P. 3713/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2185 Const. P. 1250/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2186 Const. P. 3263/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst, Zarka Bano (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2187 Const. P. 1865/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst. Sadia & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes Petitioner in Pursuance advertisement applied for the post of Oriental Teacher and Drawing Teacher .They claimed that on conducting the written test were declared Successful candidate. They approached for obtaining offer order but could not. State council informed that Since irregularities were found in the test no result of test was announced. However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and appointed .pursuant to an advertisement did not confer any right to be appointed to the posts in question to entitle the selectees to a writ of mandamus or any other writ compelling the authority to make the appointment, for the simple reason that the whole process has been scrapped and nothing is left to be filled up. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents Since the Government also has the right to cancel the recruitment process. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh & others (supra), Civil petition No 186k /2013 consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.281-K/2019 Miss Sadia and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2188 2017 PLC Lab. 122 Const. P. 1486/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Messrs Pakistan Petroleum Limited (Petitioner) VS Arif Aziz & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2189 Const. P. 75/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Huma Jokhio & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2980/2017 Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDCL) and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
2190 Const. P. 2980/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Dhano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2191 Const. P. 5079/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Farhat Iqbal and 11 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.411-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Syed Farhat Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2192 Const. P. 1096/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst: Abida & others (Petitioner) VS H.M.C Hyderabad & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 No Petitioner seeking Pension ,financial assistance ,back benefit. Respondent`s Council filed a Statement with cheque in the name of Petitioner with undertaken that remaining dues paid with in two month. Petition disposed off. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2193 Const. P. 1708/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Yousif Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2194 Const. P. 233/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Rizwan Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.282-K/2019 Rizwan Ahmed and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2195 Const. P. 36/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2196 Const. P. 905/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Miss. Erum & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-19 Yes Petitioner in pursuance advertisement applied for drawing teacher & Orientale teacher. They claimed on conducting the written test they declared successful candidate. they approached obtaining offer letter but could not. State council informed that since irregularities were found in the test no result of written test was announced .However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and not appointed. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents had found something fishy in the matter and recommended for scrapping of the whole recruitment process. The material placed on record before this Court clearly shows that a policy decision was taken by the Government to have the recruitment undertaken for the posts by way of fresh advertisement. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Civil petition no 186K/2013 Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh &others(supra), consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.283-K/2019 Miss Erum and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Department Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2197 Const. P. 4689/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sheikh Muhammad Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2198 Const. P. 2428/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Hussain Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Project Director, S.M.B.B Town and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2199 Const. P. 5577/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3440/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1592/2017 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2200 Const. P. 8356/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Qamar Shahid Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2201 2019 PLC (CS) 751 Const. P. 2520/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Faisal Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2202 Const. P. 1174/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.384-K/2019 Muhammad Abdul Moeti Atif v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Education & Literacy Deptt: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2203 Const. P. 3400/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sarfraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2204 Const. P. 1920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ishtiaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2205 Const. P. 6971/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2966/2018 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.69-K/2019 M/s ISIS Pharmaceuticals & Chemical Works, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2206 Const. P. 791/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Aijaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1126/2019 Rana Ghulam Shabbir v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Interior, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed.CMAs are also Disposed of.
2207 2018 YLR 376 Cr.Bail 591/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Abdul Bari Banglani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.P.73-K/2017 Abdul Bari v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2208 Cr.Bail 614/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O KHALIL AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2209 Const. P. 522/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Alam Khan Bugti (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Risaldar K.Kot & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2210 2021 PLC (CS) 430 Const. P. 5026/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2211 2020 PLC (CS) Note 13 Const. P. 7941/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Sabiha Ilyas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2212 Const. P. 5408/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sultan Zareen and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.119-K/2019 Sultan Zareen v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others,C.P.120-K/2019 Niaz Mohammad v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending Adjourned
2213 Const. P. 5326/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Nazeer Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2214 Const. P. 143/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mujib ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1154-K/2018 Mujib-ul-Islam v. Province of Sindh thr.Chief Secy: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2215 Const. P. 6643/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shiraz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2216 2018 CLC 443 II.A. 98/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Saleh Muhammad (Appellant) VS Mst.Rahima Bai & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.85-K/2017 Mst: Rahima Bai and others v. Saleh Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2217 Const. P. 6006/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Manthar Ali Zardari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3524/2017 Manthar Ali v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi & another,C.A.1594/2017 Manthar Ali v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2218 Const. P. 2075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mujeeb ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2219 Const. P. 6131/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Moomal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman SPSC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2220 Const. P. 6818/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Tahira Tauseef and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commisison and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2221 Const. P. 4947/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Askari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.24-K/2019 Askari Bank Limited v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Labour & Human Resource Department and another,C.A.97-K/2019 Askari Bank Limited v. Govt. of Sindh thr. Secy: Labour & Human Resource Department and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2222 Const. P. 4810/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2223 Const. P. 336/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2224 Const. P. 2040/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Agha Steel Ind (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2225 Const. P. 3127/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Al-Karam Textile Mills Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2226 Const. P. 5918/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Ahsanullah Khan Nazir (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1104-K/2018 Dr. Ahsanullah Khan Wazir v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2227 Const. P. 8282/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Sarwar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2228 Const. P. 2439/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mian Mushtaq Ahmed Sajid (Petitioner) VS DGE and CE GHQ and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.176-K/2019 Mian Mushtaq Ahmed Sajid v. Director General Welfare and Chief Engineer (Army) Rawalpindi Cant. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2229 2018 PLC CS 1015 Const. P. 3555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4307/2017,C.M.A.8212/2017,C.P.1247/2018,C.A.170/2018,C.A.171/2018,C.P.4865/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered & fixed in Next Week.,Disposed Dismissed(Bench=HJ(12)+HJ(16),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
2230 2018 MLD 1085 Const. P. 510/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Moinuddin (Petitioner) VS Rashid Khan and 3 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.490-K/2016 The Province of Sindh and others v. Dost Muhammad Chandio Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2231 2019 PLC (CS) Note 5 Const. P. 6221/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Rab Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.675-K/2017 Rab Nawaz v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2232 2019 PLC (CS) 839 Const. P. 631/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shah Abul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2233 2021 SBLR Note 654 Const. P. 1068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Riffat Humayun (Petitioner) VS P.T.V and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.637-K/2018 Riffat Humayun v. Pakistan Television Corporation Ltd. thr. its Managing Director and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2234 Const. P. 4581/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ali Gohar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Provinvce of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2235 Const. P. 2281/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Anwar Textie Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3305/2018,C.A.94-K/2019,C.P.5413/2021,C.A.2867/2022 SCP Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
2236 Const. P. 3570/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Younus Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3589/2018 M/s Younas Textile Mills Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted
2237 2018 PLC (CS) Note 59 Const. P. 140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4923/2017 Syed Zahid Hussain v. Federation Of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Commerece and others,C.A.2106/2019 Syed Zahid Hussain v. Federation Of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Ministry of Commerece and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed exoeditiously preferably after 3 month,Pending
2238 2018 MLD 1389 Cr.Bail 667/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 FARHAN HASSAN S/O SAGHEER HASSAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2239 Const. P. 5048/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Sabir Raza (Petitioner) VS HIGH COURT OF SINDH AND ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2240 2019 PLC (CS) Note 46 Const. P. 4652/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Salman Sabir (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.46-K/2019 Salman Sabir v. M/s Pakistan Steel thr. its Chief Executive Office and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2241 2020 SCMR 98 Const. P. 5773/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Irfan Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1444-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others,C.A.86-K/2018 House Building Finance Company Ltd. and others v. Muhammad Irfan Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
2242 Const. P. 480/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Phoenix Armour (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2971/2018 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.74-K/2019 M/s Phoenix Armour Pvt, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2243 Const. P. 1104/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mazhar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2244 Const. P. 6498/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Shafi Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qayyum Solangi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2245 Const. P. 3019/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Hayat Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2246 Const. P. 2774/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Khushnood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2247 Const. P. 3082/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 EPLA Laboratories Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2963/2018 M/s ELPA Laboratories Pvt Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.66-K/2019 M/s ELPA Laboratories Pvt Ltd. v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
2248 Const. P. 1764/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Apna Micro Finance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2249 Const. P. 2755/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Artistic Milliners (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1970/2019 Abdul Azeem Khan Pathan v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2250 Const. P. 3337/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2251 Const. P. 131/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Allahabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2252 Cr.Bail 546/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Haresh Kumar Hindu (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2253 Const. P. 1259/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Kazim Uddin Pasha (Petitioner) VS Prime Minister of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2254 Const. P. 2001/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2255 H.C.A 42/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Rani (Appellant) VS Pakistan Internationial Airline Corporation & anor (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2256 Const. P. 1274/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s J & P Coats Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2257 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2258 Const. P. 5483/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Papoo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1158-K/2018 Papoo Khan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2259 2019 PLC (CS) Note 51 Const. P. 1001/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ahsanullah Lakho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2260 Const. P. 521/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muzzafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-SEP-19 Yes Review--The grounds taken by the Petitioner in the review application were considered at the time of hearing of main petition and the request of the Petitioner regarding the factum of non-statutory rules of service of the Respondent-corporation, which is basically a non-statutory Corporation and claiming that Respondent-corporation has statutory rules of service is not the correct legal position of the case for the simple reason that merely publishing the service rules of a non-statutory body in the official gazette does not make the rules statutory ipso facto which even otherwise requires approval of the Government-- We are not in agreement with the contention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner for the simple reason that this Court considered the aforesaid submissions of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner at paragraph Nos.16 to 18 and gave finding on the issue which he is now raising in the Review Application. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2606/2018 Printing Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Secretary, Islamabad & another v. Muzaffar Ali & another,C.P.4190/2019 Muzafar Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Cabinet Division, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2261 2020 PLC Lab. 125 Const. P. 910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Sami Memon & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-AUG-19 Yes Issue of promotion of PSE-IV in Pakistan Steel Mill Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.551-K/2019 Abdul Sami Memon and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2262 2020 PLC (CS) 326 Const. P. 7114/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asifa Jawed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2263 2022 PLC (CS) 833 Const. P. 2307/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-21 Yes commutation--recalculation--subject to all just exceptions as provided under the law, if the parties are so aggrieved against the calculation of the Nazir, they may take resort of the Court of plenary jurisdiction. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2264 Const. P. 3756/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Anis-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.538-K/2019 Anis-ur-Rehman v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2265 Const. P. 3217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Muhammad Osama Shafiq (Petitioner) VS PEMRA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2266 Const. P. 964/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2267 Cr.Bail 1729/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 ARIF ALI S/O GHULAM SIKANDAR & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2268 Const. P. 795/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2269 Const. P. 2068/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Bishar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2270 Const. P. 2186/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Faqeer Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2271 Const. P. 2360/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muharram Ali Khaskheli & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2272 Const. P. 2863/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Qasim & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2273 Const. P. 271/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-SEP-19 Yes In the light of above discussion, it is crystal clear that Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of police constable on the basis of Son/Shaheed quota by issuing Standing Orders or by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014. The appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed along with pending application(s) Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2274 Const. P. 5561/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ghulam Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2275 Const. P. 5561/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ghulam Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-19 No Employment issue in ENI Company--we have to see as to whether the directions of the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid matter has been complied with in its letter and spirit or otherwise--The respondents are directed to take steps pursuant to the aforesaid directions issued by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matter and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2276 Const. P. 3097/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 AzamKhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2277 Const. P. 1561/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Humayoon Mubarak (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2278 Const. P. 2040/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2279 Const. P. 2199/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2280 Const. P. 1141/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Umar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2281 Const. P. 1404/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2282 2021 MLD 304 Const. P. 2385/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Qamar Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2283 Const. P. 7596/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Fouzia Munir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.555-K/2019 Fouzia Munir v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2284 Const. P. 6001/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Anees Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.512-K/2019 Syed Anees Ali v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2285 Const. P. 2898/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dad Rahim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-19 Yes The service of the petitioners, employees of the Fishermen???s Cooperative Society Ltd., were terminated vide letter dated 31.12.2018 issued by the Administration Department of Fishermen???s Cooperative Society. Prima-facie, the society is purely a private corporate body with no public duty; hence, a writ of mandamus would not lie against the Respondent-Society. The Respondent-Society is a co-operative society constituted under the agreement between members thereof, who are to abide by the provisions of the Co-operative Societies Act, and the rules and bye-laws framed thereunder by the Society. The society is undisputedly not a department of the State and is also not a creature of any statute but merely governed by a statute. We may observe here that this Court can only interfere in the matter, if it is established that a mandatory Provision of a statute has been violated. The dispute so noted by this Court essentially related to the claims and counter claims of the private parties relating to the service matter, which in our view is an internal matter between them and rights of the petitioners are purely of a private character, not open to be dealt with in a writ petition; therefore, writ of mandamus cannot be issued under the Article 199 of the Constitution, 1973 for petitioners??? reinstatement in service. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2286 Civil Revision 270/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad (Applicant) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2287 Const. P. 1860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2288 Const. P. 1534/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zakir HUssain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2289 Const. P. 348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2290 Const. P. 637/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Manzoor Alam and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2291 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 266 Const. P. 2054/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Natho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2292 Const. P. 2550/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mohsin Ali & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2293 Const. P. 2299/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Hawa Jarwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2294 Const. P. 455/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Farhan Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2295 Const. P. 3689/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Francis Khokhar (Petitioner) VS S.L.AT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2296 Const. P. 3691/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2297 2020 PLC Lab. 145 Const. P. 3926/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 M/S Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Petitioner) VS Member, Sindh Labour appellate Tribunal & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.748-K/2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation v. Member Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2298 Const. P. 1195/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Asmatullah (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2299 Const. P. 3504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2300 Const. P. 1885/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2301 Const. P. 3445/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 M. Fayaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2302 Const. P. 1000/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Raza Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2303 Const. P. 413/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sajjad Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2304 Const. P. 2683/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hamayoon Mubarak (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2305 Const. P. 3791/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2306 Const. P. 377/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2307 Const. P. 1588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Riffat Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2308 Const. P. 6813/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2309 Const. P. 6815/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2310 2021 SBLR Sindh Note 261 Const. P. 144/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Leemon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2311 Const. P. 1923/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Jam & others (Petitioner) VS Abbas & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.546-K/2019 Muhammad Saleem and others. v. Muhammad Jam and others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2312 Const. P. 502/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst .Rani Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes whether Constable Mushtaque Khaskheli embraced Shahadat on 04.3.2015 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014. Shahadat Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2313 Const. P. 136/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Amjad Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2314 Const. P. 454/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mansoor A. Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.541-K/2019 Mansoor Ahmed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2315 Const. P. 2403/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Parvaiz Jamal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2316 Const. P. 1137/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2317 Const. P. 2747/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jameela Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2318 Const. P. 1121/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2319 Const. P. 2551/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2320 Const. P. 6110/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Abid Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.539-K/2019 Muhammad Abid Shahzad v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.43-K/2020 Muhammad Abid Shahzad v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned for larger Bench.
2321 Const. P. 4935/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asad Akram and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2322 I. A 26/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 M/S Quaraquram Cotton Ginners Factory & Oil Mills& (Appellant) VS NBP and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2323 Const. P. 1343/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Nek Muhammad (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.60-K/2020 Nek Muhammad v. The Water & Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2324 Const. P. 1406/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Ilamzadi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2325 Const. P. 931/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samreen & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2326 Const. P. 2467/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Boota Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2327 Const. P. 2680/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sachal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2328 2021 PCr.LJ 394 Cr.Bail 1489/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 WAKEEL KHAN S/O FATEH KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-DEC-19 No Reasons of Post arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2329 Const. P. 2366/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Danish Kaimkhani (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2330 Const. P. 2469/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dileep Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2331 Const. P. 93/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Rabani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2332 Const. P. 1826/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2333 Const. P. 5330/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mujahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-SEP-19 Yes i) Whether the petitioner was non-suited by this Court vide judgment dated 30.3.2018 in earlier round of litigation and the same view was affirmed by the Honorable Supreme Court in Civil Petition No457-k of 2018, vide order dated 19.4.2018, therefore, similar relief cannot be claimed by filing subsequent legal proceedings? ii) Whether Rule 12 of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1974 was amended vide Notification dated 14.9.2018 issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh, whereby relaxation up to maximum of fifteen (15) Years in the upper age limit to all the applicants applying for the vacancies in all the Departments of Government of Sindh were done away against the posts to be filled through Combined Competitive Examination by the Sindh Public Service Commission? Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2334 Const. P. 1997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2335 Const. P. 400/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2336 Const. P. 3556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst: Shareefan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2337 Const. P. 1112/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Ghulam Nabi Shah & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2338 Const. P. 2075/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aijaz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.146-K/2021 The Commissioner Inland Revenue v. M/s. Engro Foods Limited Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2339 Const. P. 2993/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Liaquat Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh Andothers (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2340 Const. P. 3147/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Javed Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2341 II.A. 5/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.729-K/2019 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others,C.A.88-K/2022 Ali Bux v. Mst: Asghari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2342 Const. P. 1544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dilshad Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2343 Const. P. 1763/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2344 Const. P. 2021/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Tahir Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.437-K/2020 Tahir Muhammad v. Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2345 Const. P. 1085/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2346 Const. P. 369/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr. Santosh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2347 Const. P. 3498/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2348 Const. P. 3063/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Jam Memon (Petitioner) VS Abdul Shakoorand others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2349 Const. P. 1256/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Abdul Razzaq and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2350 Const. P. 207/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Achar Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2351 Const. P. 2011/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Anwar and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2352 Const. P. 5410/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. Petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent-Sindh Government to annul the probationary period of two (02) years for confirmation of Government jobs--we do not see violation of any fundamental right of the petitioners in relation to fixation of probationary period by the Government. Accordingly, the instant petition, being misconceived, is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2353 Const. P. 1721/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Aijaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.726-K/2020 Aijaz Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2354 Const. P. 6051/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahid Saleem (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Cabinet Division and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2355 Const. P. 3006/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Nayyar Qayum (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1798/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Nayyar Qayyum and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2356 Const. P. 640/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Saba Hameed Ujjan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2357 Criminal Appeal 281/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalil-ur-Rehman alias Bholoo (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.166-K/2020 Sher Muhammad v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2358 Const. P. 918/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2359 Cr.Bail 229/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Kashif Ayaz (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2360 Const. P. 2194/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Anwer and others (Petitioner) VS Fouji Foundation Model School & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2361 Const. P. 667/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ashok Kumar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2362 Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2363 Const. P. 6549/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Welfare Association of Field & another (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2364 Const. P. 3400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Subhan (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-20 Yes NBP--demotion of the petitioner from the post of Vice President/Ex-Manager to next lower grade--Adverting to the claim of the petitioner with regard to his promotion in the next rank under NBP Staff Service Rules, 1973. It is well settled proposition of law that it is the Service Rules Committee of the respondent-bank which has to determine the eligibility criteria of promotion of the petitioner for which they have to take decision in accordance with law--In view of the foregoing facts concluded in para 07 supra, the action taken by the respondent Bank is/was too harsh, therefore we set aside the impugned orders dated 26.11.2014 regarding demotion of the petitioner and order dated 03.03.2017 regarding demotion in pay. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.197-K/2020 National Bank of Pakistan NBP and others v. Abdul Subhan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2365 Const. P. 9015/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Qari Muhammad Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-20 No Contempt--In our view, the compliance report submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor is not in line with the order dated 26.09.2019 passed by this Court in letter and spirit. Resultantly, the compliance report is rejected. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2366 I. A 26/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rahim Dino & another (Appellant) VS Learned Asst: Commissioner/ LAO Islamkot @ Mithi (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1287-K/2022 Muhammad Rizwan v. Saleem Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2367 Const. P. 5336/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Alsons Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Alsons Ind Peoples Empl: Union and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2368 Const. P. 1999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2369 Const. P. 678/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Akhlaque Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2370 Const. P. 655/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Qazi Zubair Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2371 Const. P. 593/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhamamd Janib Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Chairman and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2372 Const. P. 197/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sht. Marvi (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2373 Const. P. 265/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Aqeela and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2374 I. A 6/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Rana Imran Mehmood (Appellant) VS M/S NIB Bank Ltd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2375 Const. P. 390/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP D 467,468,804,1304/2012 2012 Sardar Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2376 Const. P. 1753/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mazhar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2377 Const. P. 1865/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Younis & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2378 Civil Revision 115/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Hashim (Applicant) VS Daim thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2379 Const. P. 153/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Kamal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Ayoub Qureshi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-19 No The aforesaid order was merged in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, however, the findings of learned Rent Controller that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and disposed of Rent Application being infructuous. Prima-facie, the aforesaid findings explicitly suggest that he has taken the decision in the light of order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court; therefore, the applicant ought to have availed the remedy as provided under Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 and not before this Court, in a disposed of matter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.47-K/2020 Kamal Ahmed v. Ayoub Qureshi and others,C.A.19-K/2021 Kamal Ahmed v. Ayoub Qureshi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted ,Pending
2380 Const. P. 2429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2381 Civil Revision 129/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Hans lal @ Hans lo and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail and an others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2382 Const. P. 468/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Qurban Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2383 Const. P. 5273/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Noor Muhammad Daudpota and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-OCT-20 No regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. regularization in MDA--In our view, every post is required to be filled through the method prescribed by law not otherwise. In the present case, the petitioners are admittedly Adhoc and contractual employees of the respondent-authority and thus have no vested right for regular appointment. So far as contract employment is concerned, In our view, a contract employee, whose period of contract employment expires by efflux of time, carries no vested right to remain in employment and this Court cannot force the respondent-authority to regularize or extend the contract period of the petitioners in writ jurisdiction. Prima-facie we do not see any illegality in advertising the subject posts to be filled through a competitive process, which is the requirement of law--It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2384 Const. P. 7450/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-20 Yes I. Whether respondent No.4 can hold the charge for the post of Director I.T. in BPS-18 under the law? II. Whether respondent No.4s case falls within the ambit of Section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2385 Const. P. 864/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Matloob Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3873/2023 Province of Sindh, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Arif Hasnan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2386 Const. P. 7731/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Javed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-DEC-20 Yes promotion in PSO Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2387 Const. P. 610/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Zakir & Others (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2388 Const. P. 441/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sirajuddin (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2389 Const. P. 3454/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Attaullah Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-20 Yes We are not impressed with the analogy as put forward by him for the reasons that departmental action against the petitioner having been initiated during his service independently of a criminal case registered against him. Merely obtaining an acquittal order in a criminal case would not nullify the departmental proceedings at this stage after his retirement. Since PSB-I did not consider his case for promotion and in the meanwhile, he stood retired from service, no benefit of Rule 7-A of The Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974, could be given to him after he retired from service in the year 2017--Dismissed Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.307-K/2021 Attaullah Bhutto v. Province of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2390 Const. P. 918/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hamid Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2391 Const. P. 7261/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Wazir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2392 Const. P. 3376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zafar Azeem & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.85-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Zafar Azeem & others,C.P.748-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Zafar Azeem & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2393 Const. P. 242/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zarnaz Wahid Usman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-20 No relieving from the post of Pro-Vice Chancellor of Dow University of Health Sciences Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2394 Const. P. 3267/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2395 Const. P. 2427/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Controller Naval Accounts and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2396 Const. P. 2237/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2397 Const. P. 1194/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.442-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary & another v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi & others,C.P.1840/2020 Aijaz Ali Sahto thr. University & Board Department of the Province fo Sindh and others v. Mushtaq Ahmed Sangrasi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2398 Const. P. 1795/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Kenhar Khan Narejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2399 Const. P. 823/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS P.O SINDH and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2400 Const. P. 442/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Sughran (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2401 Const. P. 974/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2402 Const. P. 724/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Sachal Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2403 Const. P. 5814/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-22 Yes recruitment rules Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2404 Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-20 Yes Basically, the petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in BPS-05 on 02.12.1980 and his grade was enhanced and placed in BPS-06 vide office order dated 27.10.1985. Prima-facie, his juniors have been promoted in various grades whereas the petitioner has been ignored without disclosing his ineligibility or otherwise. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2405 Const. P. 558/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Younus (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 Yes Perusal of above reflects that the word consider within adjudication made by this Court amounts approval to be promoted, hence, concerned Authority has already recommended the case for approval, therefore, the petitioners case shall be approved as per recommendations within 15 days with compliance report. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2406 Const. P. 6241/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Anjum Badar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 Yes petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employees appointed on contract in BS 16 and above can be deemed to have been validly appointed on regular basis, without going through the competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, merely in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the mandatory requirement of competitive process of selection only through the Sindh Public Service Commission for appointments in BS 16 and above, which is the command of the Constitution and specific direction to the Government of Sindh by the Honble Supreme Court, can be waived, relaxed, done away with, exempted and or bypassed in view of Section 3 of the Act of 2013 ?--Whether the petitioners have any vested right for regular appointment, or to claim regularization, or to approach this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction to seek redressal of their grievance relating to regularization ; and, is there any corresponding legal duty cast on the Government of Sindh to appoint them on regular basis ? If no, then can a writ of mandamus to this effect be issued against the Government of Sindh ? --Whether Section 3 of the Act of 2013, to the extent of regularization / appointment in BS 16, 17 and 18 without the mandatory competitive process of selection through the Sindh Public Service Commission, is ultra vires the Constitution and against the law laid down and the direction given by the Honble Supreme Court to the Government of Sindh in Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and others V/S Province of Sindh and others, 2015 SCMR 456. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.735-K/2021,C.A.28-K/2021,C.A.27-K/2021,C.M.A.589-K/2021,C.P.1727-K/2021,C.P.1728-K/2021 SCP Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed [ C.P. be numbered & leave granted & C.A. be fixed after three months ],Pending ,Pending
2407 Const. P. 443/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Shabbir (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2408 Const. P. 6152/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Saleemuddin (Petitioner) VS M/s Printing Corp of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2409 Const. P. 702/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Ishfaque Ahmed Bhurt (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2410 Const. P. 244/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Lateefan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2411 Const. P. 4530/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2412 Const. P. 6539/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2413 Const. P. 7122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zamir Hussain Ujjan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Without touching the merits of the cases and by consent the competent authority of the respondent-department is directed to place the cases of petitioners for consideration of their regularization under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, before the relevant Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2414 Const. P. 2298/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-20 Yes EOBI--pension of the petitioner was stopped by the respondent/institution without disclosing any reasonable cause--We are of the firm view that the petitioner did not qualify the minimum years of service as laid down under Section 22(b) of the Act, whereby the qualifying service for being entitled to pensionary benefits is 15 years, whereas, it is an admitted fact that the petitioner was an employee of the private company and had served it only for a period of 13 years. Petitioner does not meet the requisite criteria stipulated in the said Section to claim old age pension--Adverting to the next contention that the Labor Policy-2010 was fully applicable in the case of parties, in our view, Circular No.3 of 2010 (Policy) cannot override the Act, 1976, therefore, no benefit can be obtained arising out of it--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition, being devoid of any legal standing, is hereby dismissed along with pending application with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.206-K/2020 Syed Shah Mumtaz Alam v. Government of Pakistan through Secretary, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2415 Cr.J.A 36/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Noor Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2416 Const. P. 6070/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sana Jabeen Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman SPSC (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-20 No Before parting with this case, it may be observed that in order to avoid unnecessary complications and litigation as well as hardship and embracement to the applicants, such applicants should not be allowed by SPSC to participate in any competitive process who do not fulfill the eligibility criteria specified in the advertisement. The application forms of such candidates should be rejected in the first instance so that the question of their written test etc. does not arise at all. Such vigilance on the part of SPSC shall ensure participation of only eligible candidates in the competitive process. Let notice be issued to the Chairman SPSC for compliance. The petition stands disposed of in terms of the above observations and direction with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1106-K/2023 Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC) Hyderabad v. Miss Sana Jabeen Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2417 Const. P. 3913/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-20 Yes i) Whether the petitioner possesses the required qualifications for the post of police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police as per recruitment Rules-2016 ? And ii) Whether police Constable (BS-05) in Sindh Police can be recruited on a contract basis and subsequently be regularized in service under the law? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1725-K/2021 PC.77 Jan Muahmmad & others v. Province of Sindh thorugh Secretary, Home Department Govt, of Sindh & others,C.P.5160/2021 Abdul Ghafar and others v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2418 Const. P. 7077/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Amanullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2419 Const. P. 3997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Liaquat Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-20 Yes i) whether the respondent namely Mrs. Abida Parveen was appointed in accordance with the law and had requisite qualifications and experience for the position of Registrar (BPS-19) in Environmental, Climate Change, and Coastal Development Department, Sindh Government to claim the post under the recruitment rules; ii) whether this Court can overrule the SPSCs recommendation under Article 199 of the Constitution or otherwise? And iii) whether the private respondent was awarded punishment in her previous employment and in view of such punishment, whether she could seek government employment in any other department or office. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.150-K/2021 Dr.Liaquat Ali Abro v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2420 Const. P. 4508/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.269-K/2021 Dr.Dilshad Ahmed v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2421 Const. P. 615/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam Shah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2422 Const. P. 175/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ishaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1269-K/2020 Ishaque Ahmed v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2423 Const. P. 3551/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khan Habib Afridi & 2070 Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Pakistan Steel Mills employees matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2424 Const. P. 5891/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Akram Khan Ghori and Ors (Petitioner) VS Printing Corp of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2425 Const. P. 885/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqar Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1668-K/2021 Abdul Rehman @ Rehman v. Fazl-e-Haq Khan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2426 Const. P. 2012/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Faheem (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1231-K/2020 Abdul Faheem v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2427 Const. P. 531/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Naseer Farooqi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2428 Const. P. 848/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Gerry (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 Yes M/s. Gerry's Dnata (Pvt.) Ltd.--Adverting to the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner-company that the NIRC was not competent to summon the Vice President for his appearance in Court, prima facie this assertion is misconceived for the simple reason that the learned Bench of NIRC is competent under section 54 & 55(1)(iii)(a)(b)(c)(d) and 57(a) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 . Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2429 Cr.Misc. 357/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Tehsin Ahmed Memon (Applicant) VS The State & 3 Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2430 Const. P. 780/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Tehseen Ahmed H. Qureshi & others (Petitioner) VS Ld. Distt: & Session Judge MirpurKhas & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1201-K/2020 Tahseen Ahmed H.Qureshi & others v. Learned District & Sessions Juge Mirpurkhas & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2431 Const. P. 8033/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ayoub Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1439-K/2020 Muhammad Ayub Panhwar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2432 Const. P. 811/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hanif Lalani (Petitioner) VS The State Through DG NAB, Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2433 Const. P. 348/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Jannat Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2434 Const. P. 4067/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Masood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2435 Const. P. 872/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Hassan Rajar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2436 Const. P. 432/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shaheen Airport Services Hanrd Worker Union (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2437 Const. P. 1875/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2438 Cr.Tran 15/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Ilyas (Appellant) VS Ld. Additional Sessions Judge Shahdadpur & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2439 Cr.Misc. 427/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hamid Ali (Applicant) VS 1st Adj. S.J/Ex.Officio J.P Tharparkar & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2440 Const. P. 4932/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Haleem Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the statement dated 20.10.2020 filed on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, and submission of learned AAG, this Court is left with no option but to direct the Respondents to place Petitioners' promotion case before the Provincial Selection Board-II in its next Meeting within one month positively from the receipt of a copy of this order. The Provincial Selection Board-II shall consider the Petitioner's case fairly and justly under law, rules and regulations and the result thereof be conveyed to the MIT-II of this Court. Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2441 Const. P. 535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shabbir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2442 Const. P. 2626/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khairullah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2443 Const. P. 4579/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Qasim Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 No The petitioner ought to have approached the proper forum instead of invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. It is an admitted position that the petitioner is a civil servant and since the above order was passed on his representation on 10.04.2019 in compliance of the learned Tribunals order, he ought to have approached the proper forum instead of invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. In view of the above, the petition and listed application are dismissed in limine with no order as to costs, leaving the petitioner at liberty to avail his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2444 Const. P. 7576/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Badaruddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-20 Yes the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. the petitioner stood retired from service of respondent-Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited on 18.02.2008 as a Lineman (BPS-8) under Voluntary Separation Scheme (VSS) and was drawing monthly pension up-till July, 2015, but the respondent No.2 illegally and unlawfully stopped and withheld his pension---In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed, Anis Hyder and Muhammad Shoukat Qadri in C.P No.D-5734/2018, C.P No.D-6225/2018, and C.P No.D-6766/2019 respectively. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2445 Const. P. 694/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst. Sadori (Petitioner) VS Government of sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
2446 2022 PLC (CS) 1289 Const. P. 4077/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-20 Yes Repatriation, from the appointment as Assistant Commissioner (BPS-17) in Ex-PCS Cadre by way of nomination, to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue, Sindh---we are not impressed with the grounds urged by the petitioner in his petition for the simple reason that the appointment of the petitioner in Ex-PCS cadre (BS-17) had already been declared as illegal by the Honorable Supreme Court and ordered his repatriation to his parent department i.e. Board of Revenue--In our view, since the directions of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters are still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2447 Const. P. 3605/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2448 Const. P. 1782/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2449 Const. P. 562/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Munawar & others (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2450 Const. P. 4461/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Majeed Awan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2451 Const. P. 4039/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mansoor Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-21 No prayed for referring the matter to the Honble Chief Justice for formation of Larger Bench in terms of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Multiline Associates v. Ardeshir Cowasjee and 2 others (PLD 1995 SC 423) Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4275/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd Karachi v. Mansoor Ahmed and others,C.A.1480/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd Karachi v. Mansoor Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.also status quo,Disposed Disposed of
2452 Const. P. 6229/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Yasir Iqbal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.29-K/2021 Yasir Iqbal & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh,C.P.737-K/2021 Yasir Iqbal & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ]
2453 Const. P. 1087/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Qaiser Alam and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1381/2021,C.P.5124/2021,C.P.3764/2022,C.A.4008/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
2454 Const. P. 2849/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahabuddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-22 Yes quo warranto Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.892-K/2020 Jam Abdul Fatah v. Federation of Pakistan & others,C.P.1333/2022 Shahabuddin Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2455 Const. P. 2339/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 m/s Shafi Gluccochem (Petitioner) VS government of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2456 Const. P. 6712/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Telenor Microfinance Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-OCT-21 Yes Social Security for workers Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2457 Const. P. 5229/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 HRSG SSP (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2458 Const. P. 2619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khawaja Izhar ul Hasan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2459 Const. P. 200/1989 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1989 Wazir Ali Industries (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 No applicant Muhammad Javed Khan, who is the son of late Abdul Wahid Khan/surety, has prayed that the surety documents submitted by his above named late father with the Nazir of this Court be returned to him. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2460 Const. P. 5343/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Nawab Zadi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2461 Const. P. 1869/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Talat Mehmood and Others (Petitioner) VS Bahria Univeristy and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes Bahria university Karachi--release order Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2462 Const. P. 7128/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.806-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & others v. Manzoor Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2463 Const. P. 6112/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Salah Uddin Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2464 Const. P. 6117/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Yashpal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2465 Const. P. 5098/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Yusuf Sheikh (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2466 Const. P. 6267/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Al-Hadi Textile & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2467 Const. P. 2683/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Asmat Zahra (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2468 Const. P. 1678/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rajwani Apparel Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2469 Const. P. 2790/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abu Bakar Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2470 Const. P. 1743/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shafiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2471 Const. P. 5831/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Khalique Sanjrani (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2472 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 567/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2473 Const. P. 2209/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Feroze 1888 Mills and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2474 Const. P. 22/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M. Ameenuddin Ahmed Siddiqi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2475 2022 SBLR Sindh 1129 Const. P. 4826/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-21 Yes appointment in PQA Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.535-K/2021 Muhammad Usman Ghani Qureshi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2476 Const. P. 6640/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tahir Abbas & Ors (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2477 Const. P. 5472/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2478 Const. P. 5112/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Habibullah (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2479 Const. P. 5794/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Hilal Foods (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2480 Const. P. 4434/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Manzoor Shah (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2481 Const. P. 2116/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Razzaque Steel Pvt Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2482 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 548/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2483 Const. P. 5199/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Siddique Unar and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2484 Const. P. 3930/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 Yes The pivotal question involved in the listed application is whether Civil / Government / public servant is entitled to have the protection of the previous service rendered as Adhoc temporary/contingent basis in the organization for fixation and counting of the previous service for pension. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.77/2022 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another,C.P.5919/2021 Karachi Port Trust through its Manager Legal, Karachi v. Mohammad Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2485 Const. P. 7998/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2932/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.473/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
2486 Const. P. 4536/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Naved (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2746/2022 Muhammad Naveed v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2487 Cr.Bail 259/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Mandost Malik (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2488 Const. P. 1289/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Zeba Unisa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-21 No where family heads are missing and families are suffering due to financial crises in maintaining minimum standard of life; they would also examine as to whether financial aid / assistance can be made through Zakat / Social Welfare Department and Bait-ul-Maal. They shall also assist this Court with regard to services of the missing persons whose salaries are stopped by their departments because of their absence (missing) that whether their families are entitled to receive the same or otherwise?, as per applicable service laws Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2489 Const. P. 3788/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wazir Rehman (Petitioner) VS Trustees of the Port of Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1114-K/2021 Wazir Rehman v. Trustees of the Port of Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2490 Const. P. 1116/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Paul Francis (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-21 No prayed for referring the matter to the Honble Chief Justice for formation of Larger Bench in terms of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Multiline Associates v. Ardeshir Cowasjee and 2 others (PLD 1995 SC 423) Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5053/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd thr. its M.D. Karachi v. Paul Francis and another,C.A.1481/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd thr. its M.D. Karachi v. Paul Francis and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.also status quo,Disposed Disposed of
2491 Const. P. 2511/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inspector Syed Saeed Akhtar Naqvi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2492 Const. P. 3553/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aamir Rasheed (Petitioner) VS C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2493 Const. P. 4609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asadullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-21 Yes Regularization Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2494 Const. P. 4361/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Samar Abbas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1390/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Syed Samar Abbas and others,C.P.5133/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Syed Samar Abbas and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months
2495 Const. P. 1555/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5467/2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio v. Federation o Pakistan the Secretary, Establishment Division Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2496 Const. P. 1555/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5467/2021 Muhammad Rashid Bohio v. Federation o Pakistan the Secretary, Establishment Division Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2497 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 568/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2498 Const. P. 5020/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Irfan Mukhtar Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 Yes deferment of the Petitioners promotion on grounds of the pending disciplinary proceedings Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2499 Const. P. 5099/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rahim (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2500 Const. P. 1435/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Qaiser Iqbal and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2501 Const. P. 2463/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khalid Abdul Maroof & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2502 Cr.Bail 274/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Shamshad Ali Jakhrani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2503 Const. P. 2844/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Health Department (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2504 Const. P. 5172/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imran Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shafique and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-21 No At this juncture, it would be conducive to refer order dated 31.8.2021 passed in Writ Petition No.3061 of 2021 (Pearl Continental Hotels Staff Union Pakistan Versus Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission and others). Candidly instant petition is on same and identical footings, that issue has already been adjudicated by the learned Judges of Lahore High Court and Islamabad High Court, hence petitioner has no objection if instant petition is disposed of in above terms subject to right of appeal. On that proposition, learned counsel for respondents extend no objection. Accordingly, petition is disposed of in above terms along with listed applications. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2505 Const. P. 6903/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ishaq Lashari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.201-K/2022 Muhammad Ishaque Lashari & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2506 Cr.Rev 52/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Wali Muhammad @ Hajan and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-21 Yes Against Order of Trial Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2507 Const. P. 4450/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mehtab Singh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2508 Const. P. 2210/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Chuttal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Chairman Pakistan Railways and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2509 Const. P. 2216/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Jawad Altaf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2510 Const. P. 1662/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.266-K and 1074 of 2016, resultantly the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA is directed to comply with the ratio of the aforesaid judgments in its letter and spirit and allow them joining from the date of their repatriation by the Sindh Government vide notification dated 5.7.2018 and the issue of their salary, for the intervening period, shall be decided by the competent authority of respondent-WAPDA accordingly within one month Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.542-K/2021 Muhammad Nawaz Soomro v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.P.558-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2511 Const. P. 7753/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mushtaque Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2512 Const. P. 2513/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Unar and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-21 Yes posting and transfer of District Food Controllers (DFCs) and Assistant District Food Controllers (ADFCs) in Food Department, Government of Sindh--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the transfer and posting is the prerogative of the respondent department as provided under Section 10 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973. However, the petitioners have raised the hue and cry in the matter with the assertion that their transfer and posting is based on malafide intention to accommodate the beneficiaries to usurp the huge amount or kickbacks in the disbursement of wheat in their respective area. If this is the factual position of the case, the Chief Secretary, Sindh, and Secretary Food Department, Government of Sindh, are directed to look into the affairs of disbursement of wheat in the Province of Sindh personally and ensure that the wheat is disbursed strictly under the law. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2513 Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2514 Const. P. 416/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Majid Hussain Khokhar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 Yes PCSIR Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.801-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Majid Hussain Khokhar,C.P.810-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & another v. Tariq Mateen Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2515 Const. P. 8003/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2937/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.478/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
2516 Const. P. 2217/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zeeshan Anjum and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-APR-21 Yes The main grievance of the petitioners is that their candidature for the post of Police Constable (BPS-05) has been declined without announcing the final merit list i.e. written test and interview--Prima-facie, this petition is not maintainable for the simple reason that no offer of appointment order had been issued in their favor, thus no vested right had/has accrued in favor of the petitioners. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2517 Const. P. 1425/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Momin Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Chief Collector & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.604-K/2021 The Model Collectorate of Custom v. Syed Momin Hussain Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2518 Const. P. 5196/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 SESSI United Staff Union sindh (CBA) & ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-FEB-21 Yes Sindh Employees Social Security Institution--vacant posts in SESSI were required to be filled through the competitive process--Before parting with this order, we may observe that the appointment in the public office can only be made through the competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise as discussed supra. It is well-settled law that appointments in public office are to be made strictly under applicable rules and regulations without any discrimination and in a transparent manner. Thus, all appointments in the public institution must be based on a process that is substantially and tangibly fair and within the parameters of its applicable rules, regulations, and bylaws. However, if the candidate has applied based on such admissible quota under the law he can be accommodated subject to his qualification for the post under the dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan on the subject issue-- Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2519 Const. P. 2395/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS The Secretary SWWB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 Yes The aforesaid petition is virtually against the transfer and posting order of the private respondent on Own Pay Scale basis. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2520 Const. P. 2643/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Nabi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAR-21 Yes appointment as Police-commandos (BPS-05) in SSU--whether a waiting list candidate, not declared successful, can be recommended for appointment against any vacancy occurring due to non-joining of any successful candidate. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.469-K/2021 Muhammad Nabi & others v. Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2521 Const. P. 4292/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Gul Hassan Qutrio and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.749-K/2021 Dr.Gul Hassan Qutrio & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others,C.A.33-K/2021 Dr.Gul Hassan Qutrio & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ]
2522 Cr.Bail 7/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ghulam Mustafa (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 Yes In view of the above, the role of applicants with regard to commission of alleged offence requires further enquiry as envisaged under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr. P.C. We; therefore, admit the applicants to bail subject to their furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) each and P.R. Bond in like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2523 Const. P. 6694/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Abdul Alim Zafar (Petitioner) VS The Education Sect: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2524 Const. P. 916/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Azra Khousar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2525 Cr.Bail 875/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.151-K/2021 Ghulam Qadir v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2526 Cr.Misc. 444/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Ghaffar (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2527 Const. P. 446/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Irfana &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2528 Const. P. 68/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Gulshan and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2529 Const. P. 894/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Rafique and Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2530 Cr.Bail 663/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SYED QURBAN ALI SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2531 Const. P. 719/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sumaira Umair (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2532 Cr.Bail 729/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD UMER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2533 Const. P. 2623/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Gul Hassan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2534 2022 SBLR Sindh 1826 Cr.Bail 2327/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 RIAZ AHMED DAHIRI S/O HAJI NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes From the above discourse, primarily, the pre-arrest bail is extraordinary relief and can be granted only in exceptional circumstances, if there is mala fide of the complainant and police in lodging the FIR. Prima facie, there is no mala fide of the complainant to lodge the FIR of the incident against the applicant. Previous conviction of the applicant in a criminal case as discussed supra, disentitle him for extraordinary relief as provided under Section 498 Cr.P.C. Also, there is nothing placed on record by the applicant, which could show that the applicant has been acquitted from the aforesaid case by the learned appellate Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.6-K/2022 Riaz Ahmed Dahri v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2535 Const. P. 718/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rafeeque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2536 Const. P. 736/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2537 Const. P. 751/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Jamshed Ahmed Khanzada (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2538 Const. P. 974/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2539 Cr.Bail 1035/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 ASGHAR S/O BAKHT KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in F.I.R No.199/2020, registered under Sections 393/302/34 PPC at PS Peerabad, Karachi-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2540 Const. P. 517/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abid Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.103/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Abid Hussain Yousafzai and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2541 Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2542 Const. P. 344/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2543 Const. P. 1619/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Shumaila & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2544 Cr.Bail 863/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 NANND LAL & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No In view of the above, the instant bail application stands dismissed. Consequently, the interim bail granted to them vide order dated 30.09.2021 is hereby recalled. Resultantly, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within four months. In case the trial is not concluded, within the stipulated period, then at least the complainant must be examined. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.9-K/2022 Muhammad Ali v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2545 Const. P. 745/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Asma Hameed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2546 Const. P. 442/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2547 Cr.Bail 2347/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. ZULEEKHAN ABDULLAH & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes , through the captioned bail application, has called in question, the rejection of their post-arrest Bail Application by the learned 1st Additional District Judge/Model Criminal Trial Court Malir, Karachi, vide order dated 21.10.2021, with the observations that quantity of 1400 and 1300 grams of charas is above the borderline, as settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2548 Const. P. 1160/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghous Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2549 R.A (Civil Revision) 115/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Ismail & Ors (Applicant) VS Allahdino & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2550 Const. P. 3207/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sardar Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.65-K/2022 Syed Sardar Ali Shah & others v. Government of Sindh through chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
2551 Const. P. 203/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Saifal Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2552 Const. P. 752/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Afser Sultana Chandio (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2553 Const. P. 1197/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dr. Ali Murad Lajwani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2554 Const. P. 23/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ziauddin Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.152-K/2022 The Chief Executive Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) v. Ziauddin Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2555 Const. P. 239/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nil (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2556 Const. P. 335/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2557 Const. P. 511/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sanullah (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ashraf alias Lala and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2558 Const. P. 2507/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor Shaikhson (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 Yes the Sindh Consumer Protection Act, 2014 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2559 2022 SBLR Sindh 1061 Const. P. 1170/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Haroon Sohail (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2560 Const. P. 44/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Economic Engineering Co. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS KPT (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2561 Const. P. 159/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1709/2022 Fazal uddin Soomro and others v. Province of Sindh through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi ad others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2562 Cr.Bail 827/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SHAHID ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2563 Const. P. 686/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farrukh Pasha (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2564 Const. P. 697/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Rifat Wajid (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2565 Const. P. 749/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2566 Civil Revision 267/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Arab & Ors (Applicant) VS Hakeem & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2567 Cr.Bail 1827/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 AMAN S/O MUHAMMAD HANIF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2568 Const. P. 1165/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Haque and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Special Engineering Allowance of Rs.10,000/- as admissible to the graduate engineers i.e. B.E degree holders Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2569 Const. P. 1416/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zulfiqar Ali Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.153-K/2022 Zulfiqar Ali Solangi v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2570 Criminal Miscelleneous 19/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Nabi (Applicant) VS Senior Superintendent of Police (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
2571 Const. P. 99/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2572 Const. P. 202/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Ghulam Mustafa Shah and anothers (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2573 Const. P. 1251/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mrs. Nazia Tauseef (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2574 Const. P. 413/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ms. Baby Hawa and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2575 2022 PLC (CS) 1304 Const. P. 5143/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Tariq Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.639-K/2022 Dr.Tariq Ahmed Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2576 Const. P. 1841/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Faizan Usman (Petitioner) VS D.G MDA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2577 Const. P. 1164/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Qadir and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2578 Const. P. 3380/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mumtaz Ali Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-22 Yes proforma promotion Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2579 Const. P. 742/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Adeel Haider and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2580 Const. P. 671/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Zakir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2581 I. A 39/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Syed Ameer Ali & Ors. (Appellant) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Another. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-22 Yes The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, and the impugned judgment and decree were set aside with direction to the learned Banking Court to decide the Suit expeditiously. Needless to say the Suit shall proceed ex-parte against appellants 2 and 3 as they did not file any application for leave to defend. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2582 Const. P. 3961/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Abbas Sangi & anoher (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-22 Yes In principle, the Courts cannot play the role of assessing body and sit in judgment over subjective evaluation; however, can examine whether the required objective criterion for promotion was followed or otherwise in a suitable case subject to grave illegality and perversity in the action of the authority having domain to the affairs Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.292-K/2022 Ghulam Abbas Sangi & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Finance Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2583 Const. P. 7583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nisar Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2584 Const. P. 4146/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Rizwan Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
2585 Const. P. 8341/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Rasool Bux Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2586 Const. P. 33/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Parvez Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-22 Yes the petitioner has called in question the vires of his posting order dated 01.01.2022 of respondent No.4 as Chairman Sindh Text Book Board (STBB), issued by the Chief Secretary Sindh. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.527-K/2022 Agha Sohail Ahmed Pathan v. Pervez Ahmed Baloch & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2587 Const. P. 2093/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Jamil Hasan Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.395-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Syed Jamil Hassan Kazmi & others,C.P.2191/2022 Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood Iraqi v. Syed Jamil Hassan Kazmi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
2588 Const. P. 7058/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Aslam Awan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.494/2022 Asadullah Khan v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others,C.P.284-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Aslam Awan & another,C.P.491/2022 Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (KW&SB), Karachi through its Chairman v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
2589 Const. P. 3791/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Shezan International Ltd. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.70/2022 M/s Shezan International Ltd, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2590 Const. P. 1408/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 syed Madad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2591 Const. P. 8334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Qasim (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Govt. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2592 Const. P. 2525/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Wahid Bakhsh Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2593 Const. P. 2954/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.715-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Usman Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2594 Const. P. 2123/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Lal Muhammad Rajar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2595 M.A. 5/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Asma & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2596 Const. P. 2275/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Farooq Almas (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1209-K/2022 Muhammad Farooq Almas v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Govt. of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2597 Const. P. 6644/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 ARY Communication (Pvt) Ltd & another (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1723/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2598 Const. P. 5505/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faheem Ali (Petitioner) VS The Chairman SIndh Service Tribunal (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-22 Yes we do not find that this Court has jurisdiction under Article 199(1) (ii) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as well as in terms of the ratio of the decisions rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Khalilullah Kakar v. Provincial Police Officer, 2021 SCMR 1171, and Chief Secretary Government of Punjab Lahore, etc v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390, to take into consideration all the grounds raised by learned counsel for the petitioners in the memo of petitions which wholly pertain to matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of the petitioners against which Article 212(3) of the Constitution imposes a specific bar. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.833-K/2022 Faheem Ali v. The Chairman Sindh Service Tribunal Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
2599 Const. P. 1219/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2600 Const. P. 4800/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain Crl.A.8-K/2023 Muhammad Akram v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2601 Const. P. 4919/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2602 Const. P. 733/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Tameena & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2603 Const. P. 397/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Owais Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2604 Criminal Appeal 41/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SYED RIAZUL HASSAN ALIAS RAJU PAPA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2605 Const. P. 41/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Rasti @ Pori (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2606 Const. P. 732/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Sumaira & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2607 Const. P. 420/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5398/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Bakhat Ali Vighio,C.A.2857/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Bakhat Ali Vighio Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
2608 Const. P. 403/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Jamila (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2609 Const. P. 533/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shrimati Sangeeta & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2610 Const. P. 183/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Danish Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2611 Const. P. 549/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Faiz Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2612 Const. P. 37/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Javed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2613 Const. P. 545/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Rabia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2614 Const. P. 2782/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sajjad Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-22 Yes the petitioners have assailed the suspension from service order, inquiry proceedings initiated by respondent No. 8, and subsequent issuance of show-cause notices to them by the Director-General (DG) SBCA without hearing them is illegal, unlawful, malafide, without jurisdiction and ultra-vires to the Articles 4,5,6,9,14,10-A of the Constitution and the provisions of Sindh Building Control Authority (Recruitment) Regulations 2017 read with Rule 5,6,7,8,9 and 12 of the Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2615 Const. P. 657/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Rehana & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2616 R.A (Civil Revision) 33/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muharam Khan (Applicant) VS Abuzar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2617 Const. P. 683/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Riazuddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2618 Const. P. 7077/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Naseeb Ullah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.534-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Naseebullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2619 Cr.Tran 43/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Gul Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2620 Const. P. 450/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Asif @ Atif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2621 R.A (Civil Revision) 31/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muharam Khan (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2622 Cr.Bail 347/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muhammad Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2623 Const. P. 1666/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nanjo Mal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2624 Const. P. 513/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Benish & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2625 Const. P. 712/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Leela Kalpna Devi (Petitioner) VS Secretary Minority Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 Yes Hindu Panchayat, is not a 'person' in terms of Article 199(5), therefore no writ of Certiorari or Mandamus can be issued against its office holders, in terms of Article 199(1) (a) supra. Hindu Panchayat, has no status of a public body; therefore, Hindu Panchayat is not a person exercising functions in connection with the affairs of Federation / Province and Local Authority in terms of Article 199(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
2626 I. A 81/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Province of Sindh and Others (Appellant) VS Khairuddin and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.13-K/2023 Khairuddin& another v. Government of Sindh through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2627 Const. P. 10/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mehmood Ali (Petitioner) VS Fedration of Pakisran & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2628 Criminal Appeal 75/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2019 Hamidullah Brohi (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
2629 Const. P. 72/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Naroo Thakur (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2630 Const. P. 443/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Jamila & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2631 Const. P. 269/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Nazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.254-K/2023 Govind Ram v. Federation of Pakistan & another. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2632 Const. P. 469/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Hajran & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2633 Cr.Bail 44/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASSAD ALI DAWACH S/O MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2634 Const. P. 7074/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Harrison and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.531-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Harrison & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2635 Const. P. 772/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shahzad Ali Kazak (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2636 I. A 36/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ashraf Ali Qureshi (Appellant) VS Qamaruddin Shaikh (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3954/2022 Qamaruddin Sheikh v. Ashraf Ali Qureshi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2637 Const. P. 667/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2638 Criminal Miscelleneous 341/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Sarwar (Applicant) VS Ld. ADJ Sehwan & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2639 Const. P. 719/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Altaf Hussain Solangi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Rehman & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
2640 Const. P. 1088/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2641 Const. P. 356/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Nabi @ Babo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2642 Const. P. 191/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Mutalib (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2643 Const. P. 1019/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Anjuman-e-Imamia Sindh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2644 Const. P. 236/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Salamat Ali Lakho (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2645 Const. P. 794/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Shafique (Petitioner) VS Mst. Aisha & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2646 Const. P. 665/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Shabeeran & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2647 Const. P. 286/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Asharaf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2648 R.A (Civil Revision) 39/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Sharif Jatt (Applicant) VS Rao Muhammad Hanif & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2649 Const. P. 2833/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sohail Shehzad & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2267/2022 Sohail Shehzad and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2650 Const. P. 5638/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Farhana Zulfiqar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.561-K/2023 Dr. Farhana Zulfiqar v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary National Health Services Regulations & Coordination Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2651 Const. P. 3402/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Fazal Karim Mahar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.714-K/2023 Fazal Karim Mehar v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Government of Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2652 Const. P. 181/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Nuzhat and another (Petitioner) VS SSP Hyderabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2653 Const. P. 281/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mukhtiar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2654 Const. P. 754/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Jawaid Moten (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khair un Nisa & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2655 Const. P. 787/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Shabana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2656 R.A (Civil Revision) 132/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sht. Ratani Bai (Applicant) VS Rajesh Kumar and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2657 Cr.Tran 31/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sikandar Ali (Applicant) VS Nadir Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2658 Const. P. 6211/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asad Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2659 R.A (Civil Revision) 157/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Hamzo Khan (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2660 Const. P. 2622/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Fareed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
2661 Cr.Bail 300/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Nawaz Buriro and Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2662 Const. P. 2898/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2268/2022 Muhammad Yaseen v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2663 Const. P. 752/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Atta Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 Yes The plea taken by the parties could not be agitated in Constitution petition, as this court is not in a position to look into the allegations and counterallegation in an election matter, in terms of section 60 of the Election Act, 2017, which is also covered by Article 63 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
2664 Const. P. 694/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Gul Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Mst. Rizwana & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2665 Const. P. 682/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Chander (Petitioner) VS Shrimati Hemi & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2666 Const. P. 509/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Tasleem & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2667 Const. P. 670/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Qamaruddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4270/2022 Qamaruddin through his attorney Kamran Ali v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2668 Cr.Bail 226/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Alman Jakhrani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2669 Criminal Miscelleneous 590/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 MUZAMIL SHAH (Applicant) VS SSP SANGHAR & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2670 R.A (Civil Revision) 2/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) VS Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2671 Const. P. 3585/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Kanwar Naveed Jameel and Others (Petitioner) VS The Chief Election Commissioner & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2672 Const. P. 519/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Gulshan & another (Petitioner) VS Nawaz & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2673 Const. P. 3105/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Aadill Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.573-K/2023 M. Asghar Janjua & others v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2674 Const. P. 2832/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Rasheed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2675 Const. P. 861/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Aziz Ahmed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2676 Const. P. 1374/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sohail Kamran (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.943/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Sohail Kamran and another,C.A.15/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Sohail Kamran and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2677 Const. P. 772/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ihsan Ali Lakhiar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2678 Const. P. 692/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Khalil Ahmed Arain (Petitioner) VS Election Tribunal (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2679 Const. P. 448/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2680 Const. P. 7075/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Abdul Razza and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.532-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Abdul Razzak & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2681 Const. P. 7078/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Umar Hayat and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.535-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Umar Hayat & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2682 H.C.A 317/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 USUF Pakistan Private Limited (Appellant) VS M/s. Muhammad Sabir Chippa & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.316-K/2023 USUF Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. M/s. Muhammad Sabir Chippa & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2683 Cr.Bail 440/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED AHMED IQBAL ASHRAF (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2684 Const. P. 1691/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Ursoosa Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2685 Const. P. 7084/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ahmed Gul & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2686 Const. P. 160/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Riaz Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) VS Auditor General of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2687 Const. P. 2090/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Molua Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2688 Const. P. 80/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-23 No Encroachment Matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2689 Const. P. 288/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Sui Southran Gas Co Ltd (Petitioner) VS Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-23 Yes Consumer Court has no jurisdiction in matters of alleged excessive billing by a Gas Utility Company, it lies with the GAS Utility Court under the 2016 ACT. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2690 Criminal Miscelleneous 226/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Amna (Applicant) VS S.S.P Hyderabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2691 Const. P. 7111/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ahmed Habib ul Islam (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2692 Const. P. 130/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mst. Shahbana & another (Petitioner) VS S.S. P Jamshoro & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2693 Cr.Acq.A. 245/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Saleem (Appellant) VS Naimat Ali @ Namat Ali and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2694 Cr.Bail 412/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Imran Magsi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2695 Criminal Appeal 157/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.A S 158 of 2022 2022 IRFAN ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-APR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2696 R.A (Civil Revision) 123/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Shahid Khan & another (Applicant) VS Mst. Sofia Bano & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2697 II.A. 44/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Riaz-ul-Din @ Rajab Ali. (Appellant) VS P.O.Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1017-K/2023 Riaz-ul-Deen Rajab v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Revenue Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2698 R.A (Civil Revision) 236/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Muhammad Luqman (Applicant) VS Muhammmad Usman (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2699 Criminal Miscelleneous 328/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH (Applicant) VS BANK MANAGER SIL BANK LTD CLIFTON BR (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2700 Cr.Misc. 604/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AKHTIAR HUSSAIN SOOMRO S/O ALLAH BAKSH (Applicant) VS SADAQAT ALI SOOMRO & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2701 Cr.Bail 692/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SANAULLAH @ SUNNY S/O M GUL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2702 Const. P. 1232/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Abida W/o Nazeer Raza (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2703 Cr.Acq.A. 33/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ASIF ZAMEER S/O MUHAMMAD ZAMEER (Appellant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2704 Const. P. 4153/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/s Pakistan Beverages Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAR-24 Yes Section 12 of the Ordinance 1968 provides that no temporary workmen whether monthly rated, weekly rated daily rated or piece rated and no probational or badali shall be entitled to any notice if his services were terminated by the employer, nor shall any such workman be required to give any notice or pay wages in lieu thereof to the employer if he leaves the employment of his own accord. However, the situation is quite different than the permanent workman under Section 12(3) of the Ordinance 1968. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2705 Const. P. 2027/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P No. D- 2028 of 2022 2022 Mehran Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Imran and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2706 Const. P. 689/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Rizwan Ahmed S/o Ashfaq Ahmed (Late) (Petitioner) VS The Province of SIndh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2707 Election Appeal 68/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arbab Muhammad Din Memon S/o Shamsuddin Memon (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan and Anothe (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2708 Cr.Bail 510/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2709 Criminal Miscelleneous 582/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MST. SANA NOOR SOHAIL (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD SOHAIL & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2710 Criminal Miscelleneous 708/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 M/S SAAKH PHARMA PVT LTD (Applicant) VS THE SHO P.S SAAHIL & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2711 Election Appeal 51/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Umer Nahiyo S/o Muhammad Hajan (Appellant) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2712 Election Appeal 216/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nawab Ali Brohi S/o Ghulam Ali Brohi (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2713 Criminal Appeal 4/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Barkat Ali & Others (Appellant) VS The State & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2714 Cr.Rev 38/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 WAQAR ISMAIL S/O MUHAMMAD ISMAIL (Applicant) VS ZULFIQAR ALI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2715 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 119/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Director, Directorat Gen., Int.& Inv (Custom) Kar. (Applicant) VS M/s. Chase Up, Karachi & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-24 Yes Time barred Order in Original. Collector cannot extend the time period under Section 179(3) of the Customs Act, 1969. In section 2(s) cases, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2716 Const. P. 387/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP S. 411 & 416/2023 2023 Mst. Samina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2717 Criminal Miscelleneous 525/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AMAN GUL S/O GUL ZAMAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2718 Cr.Bail 1474/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ALI S/O FAKHAR JAHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2719 Cr.Bail 1648/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JIBRAN SALEEM S/O SALEEM JAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2720 Cr.Bail 964/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr Bail.A S.983/2023 2023 Sabhago (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2721 Const. P. 400/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Omer Khalid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No In principle, the writ of quo warranto can be instituted by a person, though he may not come within the meaning of words aggrieved person. To maintain a writ of quo warranto there is no requirement for an aggrieved person, and a whistle-blower need not be personally aggrieved in the strict sense and may relay the information to the court to inquire from the person holding public office as held by the Supreme Court in the case of Jawad Ahmed Mir v Professor Dr. Imtiaz Ali Khan 2023 SCMR 162. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.526/2024 Omer Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through President of Pakistan Aiwan-e-Sadr, Islamabad through Principal Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2722 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 456/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Collector of Customs MCC (Applicant) VS M/s. S.M. Traders (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-APR-24 Yes Import into Export Processing Zones; Section 79 & 32 read with Section 156(1) of the Customs Act, 1969 are applicable Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2723 Criminal Miscelleneous 525/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD USMAN S/O KHAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2724 Criminal Miscelleneous 757/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ASAD ARIF S/O MUHAMMAD ARIF (Applicant) VS VITH ADJ KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2725 Election Appeal 178/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Irfan S/o Abdul Karim (Appellant) VS RO PS-98 Khi East-II and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2726 Criminal Miscelleneous 273/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BILAL HABIB S/O HABIBULLAH SHAIKH & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE XIVTHE CJ/JM KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2727 Election Appeal 158/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nisar Ahmed S/o Muhammad Safar (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2728 Cr.Bail 2319/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED JAMSHED S/O ABDUL REHMAN SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2729 Election Appeal 257/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muharram Khan S/o Khuda-e-Dad Khan (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2730 Election Appeal 240/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Khalid S/o Latif (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2731 Election Appeal 121/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Abdul Haque S/o Abdul Sattar (Appellant) VS RO NA-211 Mirpurkhas-I and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2732 Const. P. 1140/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shahban Ali S/o Muhammad Sachal Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2733 Election Appeal 149/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Ashraf S/o Muhammad Siddique (Appellant) VS Ali Khan Jamali and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2734 Cr.Bail 982/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 WAQAR @ WAKKO S/O ASLAM & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2735 Cr.Bail 1468/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL REHMAN @ SIKANDAR S/O AMANULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2736 Criminal Appeal 77/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD SALEEM S/O ISLAMUDDIN (Appellant) VS MST. KHALIDA SAQLAIN & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2737 Cr.Bail 1462/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MAZHAR HATAT (MUHAMMAD MAZHAR HAYAT) (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2738 Cr.Bail 1121/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB & ANR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2739 Cr.Bail 1798/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD IQBAL S/O M. HANIF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2740 Cr.Bail 2781/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ANEEL GHANI S/O NASEERUL GHANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2741 Const. P. 8137/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2742 Const. P. 4830/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Owais Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1016-K/2023 Muhammad Qwais Khan v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2743 Const. P. 447/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Haji Abdullah & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2744 Cr.Tran 9/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Wali Ahad Khan (Appellant) VS Mumtaz Ali Mallah & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-SEP-24 Yes Prima facie the ground raised by the learned counsel for the applicant is tenable based on the reason that he has life threats from the accused party to kill him if he/complainant attends the court at Khipro, in such circumstances, he intends to seek a fair and speedy trial in the criminal case pending adjudication before another court at Sanghar or otherwise, but not at Khipro, which is only possible if the trial court proceeds with the matter. However, in the best interest of justice, coupled with the instance taken by the learned counsel for the parties, it would be appropriate for a speedy trial of the case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2745 Const. P. 844/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Yaseen & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2746 Criminal Miscelleneous 126/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Qadir (Applicant) VS Learned Sessions Judge, Umerkot and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2747 Cr.Bail 135/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sarfraz @ Gujar (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2748 Cr.Bail 215/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Inayatullah & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-24 Yes Bail before arrest is an extraordinary relief granted only in exceptional cases to protect innocent people from abuse of the law. It is not a substitute for post-arrest bail. The accused must show that their arrest is being sought for ulterior motives by the police to cause them irreparable harm. They must also establish that they have not done anything that would disqualify them from receiving this discretionary relief. The aforesaid ingredients of principles are missing in the present case as the facts obtained in the present case, are tentatively assessed which prima facie show that the alleged offense occurred on June 25, 2024, and was reported the same day. Police recorded witness statements, visited the scene, prepared injury reports, and collected medical evidence as well as empty shells of the crime weapon from the place of the incident. Charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and wrongful restraint were filed against them. A medical examination confirmed injuries consistent with charges of Section 337-F (III) of the Pakistan Penal Code as Ghyr-i-Jaifah Mutalahimah. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2749 Const. P. 5893/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Zahid Hamid (Petitioner) VS Court of VIIth J.M South Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2750 Const. P. 345/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ibrahim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2751 Const. P. 1163/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mahar Chand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2752 Const. P. 1107/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Aqeel Hyder Junejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2753 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 217/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Noor Ali S/o Muhammad Umer (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-DEC-24 No Quantum of punishment is an independent aspect of Criminal Administration of Justice which, too, requires to be done keeping the concept of punishment in view. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2754 Const. P. 540/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hussain Bux (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2755 Const. P. 771/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Teerath (Petitioner) VS Beena D/o Somji (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 Yes The learned trial Court was duly empowered to appreciate the evidence and no case has been set forth to apprehend that the same was not done. Just because the view of one party did not prevail does not vitiate the process. The entire matter was open to the appellate Court, but not approached at the first instance for deliberation whether to differ with the judgment rendered by the learned trial Court or otherwise. The counsel remained unable to demonstrate any apparent infirmity about the appreciation of evidence that does not merit any consideration by this Court. Even otherwise such an exercise is not amenable for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. On the aforesaid proposition we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court reported as 2011 SCMR 1990; 2001 SCMR 574 and PLD 2001 Supreme Court 415. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2756 Const. P. 671/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Waseem Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2757 Const. P. 2628/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP No.D-3301/2022 2022 Mumtaz Ali Panhwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-24 Yes No regularisation of project employees can be ordered by the Court in absence of any law, rules or policy to that effect Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2758 Criminal Miscelleneous 122/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst. Rizwana Hakro (Appellant) VS The State & 7 others (Opponent) S.B. Order 29-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2759 Const. P. 542/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Saboo Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2760 Const. P. 1423/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Rashid Ahmed Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2761 Const. P. 491/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Akbar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2762 Const. P. 608/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hussain BUx Dashti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2763 Const. P. 1013/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Shazia & another (Petitioner) VS SHO Ps Thrushah & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JUL-24 Yes Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, that if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action will be taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, if any, pending before the competent Court of law; so far as the issue of marriage over marriage if any is concerned the same shall be taken care of by the competent forum under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2764 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 82/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD NOMAN @ MOTA S/O LIAQUAT ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2765 Const. P. 1676/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Aqib Ali Mirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
2766 Const. P. 456/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abdul Razzak & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2767 Const. P. 591/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Dr Ahmed Naeem Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2768 Cr.Bail 2426/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD AUQIB AKBAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-24 Yes Hence, because of what has been discussed above, in our tentative opinion, the trial Court has to see whether Sections 409 and 477-A PPC are attractive or otherwise and the application of the same would be resolved by the Trial Court after recording the evidence. 14. The question is whether bail can be granted during investigation, primarily, post-arrest bail can be granted during an investigation if there are no reasonable grounds to believe the accused committed the crime, or if the trial is delayed beyond the prescribed period. 15. For the forgoing reasons, applicant Muhammad Aquib Akbar son of Abdul Shakoor is admitted on post-arrest bail in Crime No.60 of 2024, under Section 409/420/468/471/477-A/109/34 PPC registered at PS FIA Crime Circle, Hyderabad, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- [Rupees two lac only] and PR Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2769 Const. P. 883/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mir Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2770 Const. P. 524/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Daud Channa & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2771 Const. P. 617/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Kashif & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2772 Const. P. 149/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sabit Ali Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
2773 Const. P. 406/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Zubaida (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2774 Cr.Bail 1154/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 AAMIR ALI S/O MUHAMMAD SOOMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JUL-24 Yes Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case, who challaned the present applicant along with others, these two versions require thorough probe by the trial Court. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant as recorded above, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail in crime No. 145 of 2024 of PS Steel Town subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2775 Const. P. 419/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Kashmir Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2776 Const. P. 426/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mehrab (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2777 Const. P. 1984/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Nisar Ahmed Solangi & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 No In the light of dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Government of the Punjab supra, we direct the Chief Secretary, Sindh to constitute a Committee headed by the administrative heads of the concerned Departments, conduct an inquiry into the extent as to why the salary of the petitioners/ arrears if any, have been withheld, after providing ample opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners and fix responsibility in the matter and take action against the delinquent officials strictly under law and the observations made by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case and submit a report to this Court through Additional Registrar of this Court, within three weeks, from the date of receipt of this order. However, if the appointment of the petitioners is found genuine their salary must be released forthwith after proper proceedings. It is made clear that if the administrative head of the department concerned who is Competent Authority shall also determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims of the parties and if he finds appointments of the petitioners made without observing codal formalities, etc. in violation of rules and regulations, he shall conduct a separate inquiry in this respect and submit such comprehensive report before this Court through Additional Registrar. However, it is made clear that after submission of the compliance report, if their cause still subsists the aggrieved party may approach this court for redressal of his/her grievances separately by filling proper application which shall be decided on merits. In the intervening period, Additional Advocate General Sindh Sukkur shall provide complete information to the competent authority about the issue of salary/arrears of the petitioners, after consultation with administrative heads of the departments concerned. He shall also submit his report accordingly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2778 Const. P. 5828/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shiraz Mazhar (Petitioner) VS D.H.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-24 Yes Article 199 of the Constitution allows this Court intervention only when: All other legal remedies have been exhausted, or, no alternative legal remedies exist. To invoke the jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner must demonstrate a vested/legal right or interest that has been violated, which the petitioners failed to demonstrate by producing cogent material on record, merely saying that reclassifying Plot No. 12-B for commercial use is not sufficient until and unless it is proved in evidence that it is illegal as the Board of DHA has no power and authority to do so under the relevant regulations, which involve zoning approvals and environmental impact assessments, depending on the proposed commercial use. Besides it is yet to be determined that Plot No. 12-B, a corner plot on Commercial Avenue, was always shown as an open plot for residential purposes, however, respondents had shown the plot's purpose as a "Sewerage Pump" station on older maps and now relocated it somewhere else. These all facts require evidence and this court at this stage cannot give concrete findings on the subject issue. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2779 Const. P. 1332/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Hussain Bux Kalwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2780 Const. P. 754/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shahrukh Dayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2781 Cr.Bail 928/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 UBEDULLAH S/O GUL MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUL-24 Yes Now, I may take up the ground of statutory delay a bare perusal of the above quoted third proviso would show that the Court is obliged to release a person on bail, who, being accused of an offense not punishable with death if he has been detained for such an offense for a continuous period exceeding one year and whose trial for such offense has not been concluded. Similarly, under clause (b) of the above proviso, the Court is obliged to release a person, who, being accused of an offense punishable with death, has been detained for such offense for a continuous period exceeding two years and whose trial for such offense has not been concluded. However, this is subject to the condition provided in the above third proviso, i.e., the delay in the trial of the accused should not have occasioned by any act or omission of the accused or any other person acting on his behalf, while, the fourth proviso provides a further rider on the above statutory right of an accused person to bail on the above ground of statutory delay by laying down that the third proviso to above subsection shall not apply to a previously convicted offender for an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or a person who in the opinion of the Court is a hardened, desperate or dangerous criminal or involved in terrorism. In principle the right of an accused to be enlarged on bail under the proviso, referred to ibid, is a statutory right that cannot be denied under the discretionary power of the Court to grant bail, however, if the case falls under the fourth proviso, bail can be refused by the Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2782 Cr.Bail 176/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Shaikh Muhammad Bilal (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation. In that newly inserted Section 489-F of P.P.C., the maximum relief for the complainant of the case is the conviction of the responsible person and punishment as a result thereof, which may extend up to 3 years or with a fine or both. The cheque amount involved in the offense under such a section is never considered stolen property. Had this been treated as stolen property, the Investigating Agency would certainly have been equipped with the power to recover the amount also as is provided in Chapter XVII of P.P.C. relating to offenses against property. The offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. is not made part of the said Chapter providing the offenses and punishments of offenses against property, rather in fact the same has been inserted in Chapter XVIII of P.P.C., regarding offenses relating to documents and to trade of property marks. Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2783 Const. P. 30/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Zaheer Ahmed Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No The Supreme Court held that Article 164 of the QSO allows for the admission of evidence obtained through modern devices or techniques. This includes oral evidence of a witness that becomes available through video conferencing. The court emphasized the importance of adapting the law to modern technology to improve the efficiency and accessibility of justice. By allowing video conferencing, the courts can enhance access to justice, promote fair trials, and ensure more efficient and expeditious justice. This interpretation of the law advances the fundamental rights under Articles 9 and 10A and the principle of policy under Article 37(d) of the Constitution. 8. The Supreme Court emphasized that the courts have discretionary powers under Section 151 of the CPC and Article 164 of the QSO to allow virtual attendance of witnesses. However, this discretion must be exercised judiciously and based on valid reasons. The courts should consider whether the witness's evidence is essential for a just decision and whether requiring physical attendance would cause unreasonable delay, expense, or inconvenience. The standard for "unreasonable delay, expense, or inconvenience" is provided in various articles of the QSO and the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2784 Const. P. 920/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Ajmal (Petitioner) VS SSP MPK & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2785 Const. P. 701/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Haresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2786 Const. P. 1363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Ghulam Hyder Deho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2787 Const. P. 702/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Changez Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2788 Const. P. 634/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Asad Habib and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2789 R.A (Civil Revision) 86/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2023 Azam khan and others (Applicant) VS Siddique and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2790 Cr.Bail 320/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shahzaib Gul Wassan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-24 Yes Additionally the case against the applicant, in the absence of any independent witness of the alleged incident, requires further inquiry as contemplated under sub-section (2) to Section 497, Cr.P.C. In the case of Muhammad Tanveer v. The State (PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733) the Supreme Court while extending the grace, granted bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2791 Const. P. 75/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mohammad Shahid & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2792 Const. P. 218/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-OCT-24 Yes The controversy as raised by the parties about the custody of the minor needs to be looked into by the learned Guardian and Wards Court concerned, if approached and the decision thereof shall be made within a reasonable time, keeping in view the welfare of the minor strictly under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557 and Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain Vs. Station House Officer, Police Station Saddar Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat (2024 SCMR 484). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2793 Const. P. 536/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Dhani BUx (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2794 Const. P. 1258/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Asma Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2795 Const. P. 213/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Rani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes Without touching the aforesaid crucial issue, which is not feasible at this stage to dilate upon and same shall be taken up in other proceedings. 8. In view of the above instant petition is disposed of with the direction that petitioners shall not be harassed by police officials or any other person and to protect the petitioners under law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2796 Const. P. 581/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Rehmatullah Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2797 Const. P. 1337/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Humera & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2798 Const. P. 128/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Raza Burdi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2799 Const. P. 1049/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hawa & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2800 Const. P. 586/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Hussain mashori (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2801 Const. P. 457/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Ghaffar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2802 Const. P. 1192/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Dilmurad Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2803 Const. P. 607/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Faqeer Mumtaz Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2804 Const. P. 1591/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Siraj Ahmed Dharejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2805 Const. P. 1544/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Shabir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2806 Const. P. 748/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mrs. Musarrat Seema D/o Haji Fazal Elahi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-24 No It is a well-settled law that the paramount consideration while deciding the question of custody of the minor is the welfare of the minor which has to be seen in view the age, sex, and religion. Welfare includes his/her moral, spiritual, and material well-being. While considering what is the welfare of the minor the court shall have regard to the age, sex, and religion of the minor, the character and capacity of the proposed guardian, his/her nearness of kin to the minor, and the preference of the minor if he or she is intelligent enough to make it. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2807 Const. P. 824/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arif Ali (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2808 Const. P. 74/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Tarique Mubeen Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2809 Const. P. 571/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abid Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2810 Const. P. 656/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Allahdad & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2811 Const. P. 6122/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Tehseen Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-24 Yes Moreover, in a chain of judgments, the Supreme Court has pronounced that the revenue authorities can only resort to variation/correction of old standing entries in the revenue record if those which crept in due to some omission, inadvertence or clerical mistake. In this context, reference can conveniently be made to the cases of Waris Khan and 18 others v. Col. Humayun Shah and 41 others (PLD 1994 SC 336) and Muhammad Yousaf and 3 others v. Khan Bahadur through L.R.s. (1992 SCMR 2334). In the case of Muhammad Yousaf (Supra), the Supreme Court has drawn a line of distinction between the matters wherein the revenue authorities have the jurisdiction to effect any correction and those which are to be determined by the Civil Courts on the move of the aggrieved party Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2812 Const. P. 411/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sohbat Ali Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2813 Cr.Rev 61/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ameer Ali Shahani (Applicant) VS Ghulam Sarwar Shahani & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2814 Const. P. 534/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Awal Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2815 Const. P. 157/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Bushra Bibi Syed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2816 Const. P. 1710/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Javed Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2817 Const. P. 5634/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Tehmina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-24 No In view of judgment in case of Nadia Parveen vs. Almas Noreen reported in PLD 2012 SC 758 since minors being aged about 7, 8 and 9 years, are not of tender age hence mother is entitled to approach Guardian and Wards Court in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2818 Const. P. 1800/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mashooq Ali Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2819 Const. P. 813/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Saleem Khan (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2820 Const. P. 2739/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Haji Muhammad Ashraf Memon (Petitioner) VS Ministry of Housing & Works & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-24 Yes The High Court's constitutional jurisdiction is extraordinary and should only be used when other remedies are unavailable. The Supreme Court's judgment in Dr. Abdul Nabi's case (2023 SCMR 1267) supports this view. ???The extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is envisioned predominantly for affording an express remedy where the unlawfulness and impropriety of the action of an executive or other governmental authority could be substantiated without any convoluted inquiry. The expression "adequate remedy" signifies an effectual, accessible, advantageous, and expeditious remedy that should also be remedium juris, i.e. more convenient, beneficial, and effective. To effectively bar the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, the remedy available under the law must be able to accomplish the same purpose which is sought to be achieved through a writ petition. This extraordinary jurisdiction is provided as a remedy to cure illegality which can be established without any elaborate inquiry into disputed facts??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2821 Const. P. 600/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Asif Ali Bambhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2822 Cr.Bail 1042/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 NIAZ HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD SHAHBAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-24 No From the perusal of the FIR, it appears that the same has been lodged against the unknown accused persons who committed the alleged offence, however, there is no description of the accused persons mentioned in the FIR. The record does not show that any implicating material has been recovered from the applicant/accused. 7. From the record, it also transpires that the applicant/accused was involved in the case upon his statement in police custody on the premise he was arrested on 26.04.2024, who disclosed that he purchased the mobile phone, whereby he inserted the sim that phone, thus his action falls within the ambit of Section 411 PPC, however at the same time his case was forwarded for identification parade but the application of the police was rejected as the complainant and his witnesses did not turn up. 8. If this the position of the case, in such a scenario the Supreme Court in the case of The State through Director Anti-Narcotic Force, Karachi v. Syed Abdul Qayum [2001 SCMR 14], while dilating upon the evidentiary value of statement made before the police in the light of mandates of Article 38 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, inter alia, held that statements recorded by police during investigation are inadmissible in the evidence and cannot be relied upon. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2823 Const. P. 849/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Eidan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2824 Const. P. 1527/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Ghulam Shabbir Deho (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2825 Const. P. 1114/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Director General Agricultural Resaerch (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes The details of F.R. 54 elucidate that in the situation where a dismissed government servant is reinstated, the revising or appellate authority may grant his pay to him for the period of his absence from duty. Seemingly, the letter in question refers to F.R. 54 (a), which emphasizes that if such a government servant is honorably acquitted, he shall be granted the full pay to which he would have been entitled if he had not been dismissed or removed, and, by an order to be separately recorded, any allowance of which he was in receipt before his dismissal or removal. In a case falling under clause (a), the period of absence from duty will be treated as a period spent on duty. According to the explanation attached to this Rule, the "revising authority" means the "authority" or "authorized Officer" as defined in the Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, who passes the final order on the case and not the authority who passes an order on appeal. 7. Even otherwise, the details of F.R. 54 clarify that in the case of reinstatement of a dismissed or removed employee, only the revising or appellate authority may grant him his pay for the period of his absence from duty, and if he is honorably acquitted then, the full pay to which he would have been entitled to, and his period of absence from duty will be treated as a period spent on duty. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2826 Const. P. 1553/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Kashif Masih (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2827 Const. P. 495/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zain Ali Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2828 Cr.Bail 9/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Shahnawaz & others (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2829 Const. P. 835/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Darhoon & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2830 Const. P. 165/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2831 Const. P. 178/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Khalid Ahmed Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
2832 Const. P. 1146/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mazharuddin Koondhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2833 Const. P. 173/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Shaheen Mukhtiar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2834 Cr.Bail 127/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sooran Singh @ Soorio (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2835 Spl.Anti.Ter.J.A. 21/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 IRFAN @ LAL S/O MUHAMMAD YAQOOB (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-DEC-24 No Quantum of punishment is not only discretion of the Court, which has to be exercised while considering the circumstances of the case, but also is an independent aspect of Criminal Administration of Justice which, too, requires to be done keeping the concept of punishment in view. 5. Since, appellant is not pressing captioned appeal on merits but seeking reduction of sentences, therefore, we would examine the legality of such plea. Conceptually, punishment to an accused is awarded on the concept of retribution, deterrence or reformation so as to bring peace which could only be achieved either by keeping evils away (criminals inside jail) or strengthening the society by reforming the guilty. There are certain offences, the punishment whereof is with phrase ???not less than??? while there are other which are with phrase ???may extend up to???. Thus, it is quite obvious and clear that the law itself has categorized the offences in two categories regarding quantum of punishment. For one category the Courts are empowered to award any sentence while in other category the discretion has been limited by use of the phrase ???not less than???. Such difference itself is indicative that the Courts have to appreciate certain circumstances before setting quantum of punishment in first category which appear to be dealing with those offences, the guilty whereof may be given an opportunity of ???reformation??? by awarding less punishment which how low-so-ever, may be, will be legal. The concept of reformation should be given much weight because conviction normally does not punish the guilty only but whole of his family/dependents too. A reformed person will not only be a better brick for society but may also be helpful for future by properly raising his dependents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2836 Const. P. 120/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Aijaz Ali Rajper & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2837 Const. P. 817/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Sajid Shamshad (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2838 Const. P. 3873/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2839 Const. P. 6387/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhib Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-20 No Contempt Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2840 Const. P. 6171/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Shah Wajid Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.867-K/2016 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2017 Generation School (Pvt) Ltd. and another v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
2841 Const. P. 5235/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mohammad Mithal Jokhio and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-20 No Contempt---This Petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 17.08.2016 with direction to the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for promotion of the petitioners in BPS-11--Perusal of the order dated 17.08.2016 passed by this Court in the aforesaid matter is clear in its terms; and, that the post of Secretary Union Council was placed in Basic Pay Scale 08 with effect from 01.07.2016 and all posts of Secretaries of Union Committees belonging to Sindh Councils Unified Grades Service have been placed in BPS-11, with effect from 01.07.2016--Dismissed Contempt---This Petition was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 17.08.2016 with direction to the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for promotion of the petitioners in BPS-11--Perusal of the order dated 17.08.2016 passed by this Court in the aforesaid matter is clear in its terms; and, that the post of Secretary Union Council was placed in Basic Pay Scale 08 with effect from 01.07.2016 and all posts of Secretaries of Union Committees belonging to Sindh Councils Unified Grades Service have been placed in BPS-11, with effect from 01.07.2016--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2842 Const. P. 5312/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.516-K/2018 Abdullah Khan v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2843 Cr.Bail 406/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ZARDULLAH KHAN S/O SHUJA ALAM KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2844 Const. P. 8533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Toufiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2845 2019 SBLR Sindh 1861 Const. P. 4377/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Dr. Itrat Malik (Petitioner) VS State Life Insurance Co-opration & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2849/2018 State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Dr. Itrat Malik Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2846 Const. P. 825/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amir Bashir (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nosheen Fatima & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2847 2019 PLC (CS) 1324 Const. P. 608/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sajjad Hussain And ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.610-K/2018 The Chairman Port Qasim Authority Bin Qasim and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Ports and Shipping and others,C.A.74-K/2018 The Chairman Port Qasim Authority Bin Qasim and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: M/o Ports and Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2848 2019 PLC (CS) Note 25 Const. P. 634/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M. Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2849 2018 PLC (CS) Note 175 Const. P. 697/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sobia Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2850 2017 SBLR Sindh 1787 Const. P. 324/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Ali Hyder Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.295-K/2020 Syed Ali Haider Shah v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2851 Const. P. 3525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.431/2018 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution thr. its Chairman, Karachi & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
2852 Const. P. 571/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Mateen Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.653-K/2018 Muhammad Mateen Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2853 Cr.Appeal 315/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 ALI SHER S/O URIS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2854 Const. P. 4348/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Dileep Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.73-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others,C.P.426-K/2017 Govt. of Sindh and others v. Dr. Dileep Kumar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
2855 Const. P. 5541/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Tanveer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.705-K/2018 Tanveer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2856 Const. P. 5747/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Zeenat and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2857 Const. P. 1227/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Asadullah Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Govts Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2858 Const. P. 6519/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muzafar Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2859 Const. P. 52/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zafar Adil (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Javed Iqbal and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2860 Const. P. 3232/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muzaffar Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2945/2018 Secretary Ministry of National Food, Security & Research Department, Islamabad and others v. Muzaffar Iqbal Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2861 Const. P. 6471/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sikandar Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS D.G Accountant (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2862 Const. P. 2008/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2863 Const. P. 4340/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Salal Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2864 Const. P. 1415/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghulam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt.of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.571-K/2018 Umerdin Saand and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2865 Const. P. 1415/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghulam Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt.of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.571-K/2018 Umerdin Saand and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
2866 Cr.Bail 1731/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS the State (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2867 Const. P. 6300/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst Shahnaz Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-DEC-16 No SHO PS New Town, respondent No.6, has filed comments through Additional SHO, in which it is stated that alleged detenue Muhammad Yousuf is confined in Central Prison, Karachi, in Crime No.275/16 lodged under section 6/9-C CNS Act of PS Tipu Sultan. He has also attached Certificate duly signed by Senior Superintendent, Central Prison, Karachi. On this report, question of missing person is over as alleged detenue is confined in Central Prison, Karachi, in some crime though learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been falsely implicated in the case, for which, the petitioner has to avail appropriate remedy in the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2868 Const. P. 371/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes In view of the above, it is crystal clear that the respondents cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment against son quota by issuing Standing Order for recruitment in Sindh Police against Shaheed Quota, Son Quota without approval of the Provincial Government Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2869 Const. P. 2226/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Wahid Bux Aajiz Leghari (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2870 Const. P. 301/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalique Zaman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2871 Const. P. 229/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2872 Const. P. 1093/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Hari Ram (Petitioner) VS Misri and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2873 Const. P. 6654/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Capt. S. Kamal A. Mahmoodi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.375-K/2019 Capt: S. Kamal A. Mehmoodi v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2874 Const. P. 2477/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jawaid Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.563-K/2022 Javed Ahmed v. Atta-ur-Rehman and others. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2875 Const. P. 2837/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mitho and others (Petitioner) VS Ashique Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1634/2019 Ashique Ali & others v. Mitho (decd) thr LRs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
2876 Const. P. 2161/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hanif and another (Petitioner) VS Rahim Bux and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2877 Const. P. 3189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Captain (R) Javed Afzal & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.I.A.C.L & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.442-K/2019 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd.,C.A.22-K/2020 Capt: (Retd) Javed Afzal and others v. Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Corporation Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
2878 Const. P. 475/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-APR-22 No single Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2879 Const. P. 475/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2880 Const. P. 3500/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Hijab Qazi (Petitioner) VS Chairman/CEO PIAC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2881 Const. P. 3105/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2882 Const. P. 357/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Banking Court No.II, Hyd and an Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2883 Const. P. 302/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Gulsher Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2339/2019 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman v. Mumtaz Ali Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2884 Const. P. 4515/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Wahid Khursheed Kunwar (Petitioner) VS EOBI & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1165-K/2018 Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue v. Wahid Khursheed Kanwar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2885 I. A 12/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh through Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Islamuddin & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2886 Const. P. 31/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2887 Const. P. 441/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Samiuddin son of Babouddin (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2888 Const. P. 2231/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Muhammad Dawood Wagan (Petitioner) VS The province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-19 Yes In the light of foregoing, we have reached the conclusion that the amenity plots cannot be converted into either commercial or residential purposes and no encroachment can be allowed on the amenity plot as discussed supra. The report of learned Commissioner is very clear in its terms that no any amenity plot was found in existence in the housing scheme during the inspection, except one open plot of about 1200 sq.ft and a mosque about 2400 sq. ft. in Kehkashan Housing Scheme and Midland Bungalow adjacent with plot No.38 and 39, therefore, the objections raised by the learned counsel for the Respondents 8 & 9 on the site inspection report are of no consequence in view of the orders passed by this Court and Honble Supreme Court Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2889 Const. P. 4460/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Marvi Aslam & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2890 Const. P. 3623/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Syed Deedar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2891 Criminal Miscelleneous 106/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Arshad Mehmood and other (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2892 Const. P. 3641/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Aghar Ali And Ors. (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan And Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2893 Const. P. 1069/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ikramullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2894 Const. P. 61/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bibi Muzammil (Petitioner) VS Accountant District Court MPS & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2895 Const. P. 191/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Noor Muhammad Soomro & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2896 Const. P. 364/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2897 Const. P. 3445/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sheeraz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2898 2019 PLC (CS) Note 40 Const. P. 6666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Majid Anwar Seehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2899 Const. P. 3625/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sania & another (Petitioner) VS SSP Matiari & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2900 2018 CLC 1632 Const. P. 3580/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Humair Altaf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2901 Const. P. 4465/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Shafiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2782/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
2902 Const. P. 102/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Noor Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2903 Cr.J.A 4/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Younis (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2904 2018 PLC (CS) Note 71 Const. P. 7383/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pakistan Medical Association (Centre) (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-17 Yes Professor Dr. Masood Hameed Khan/Respondent No.3 filed listed application for initiation of contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnors on account of their willful, and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court. The learned law officer after consultation with the official present in Court, Additional Secretary (HE),Governor House informed that the Summary on the issue of 8appointment of Vice Chancellor is in process before the Governor Sindh/Chancellor and an order will be passed on the said summary within a week. This undertaking has also been given by the above named official . we are of the view that the same is pending in Suit No.893/2017, as such we would refrain to pass any order in this regard, because the same may prejudice the case of either party in the said Suit. assignment of the Additional Charge of Vice Chancellor of DUHS to Professor Dr. Khawar Saeed Jamali is concerned the same has already been taken care of in order dated19.04.2017 passed in Suit No.893/2017 .In view of the above discussion, at this juncture, we are of the view that no contempt of this Court's order dated 26.04.2016 is made out. Therefore, the listed applications accordingly dismissed in the above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2905 Const. P. 4335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
2906 Const. P. 255/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abu Bakar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.346-K/2019 Abu Bakar v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2907 Cr.Misc. 36/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MUHAMMAD YAQOOB (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE S.B.A & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2908 Const. P. 2230/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Kashif Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2909 Const. P. 138/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2910 Const. P. 811/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Bushra & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2911 Const. P. 3577/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Rizwan Ali Kazmi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2912 Const. P. 2446/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ms Noor Ul Ain (Petitioner) VS V/C University Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2913 Const. P. 543/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ashique Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2914 Cr.Bail 6/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MUNEER AHMED LASHARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2915 Const. P. 387/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Jawaid (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2916 Const. P. 7319/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Shamim Naqvi (Petitioner) VS P.D.O.H.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.401-K/2019 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others,C.A.21-K/2020 Ms. Shamim Naqvi v. Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority thr. Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned
2917 Const. P. 776/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Qadratullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2918 Const. P. 6766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Fazal-e-Rabbi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2919 2019 CLC 1670 H.C.A 317/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mussawar Ali (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2920 Const. P. 4849/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Kausar Iqbal Malik (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.609/2019 Kausar Iqbal Malik v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Finance, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2921 Const. P. 1155/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Kashif Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS M/s Alternative Energy And ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2922 Const. P. 897/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Insaaf Labour Union (Petitioner) VS C.E.O Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2923 2019 PLC (CS) Note 41 Const. P. 3759/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kamran Ahmed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.67-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2924 2020 PLC (CS) Note 9 Const. P. 5861/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Latif Mughal (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2925 Const. P. 4022/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 (Engr) Muhammad Hashim Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman(SUPARCO) & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2926 Const. P. 1323/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Mst. Nikhat Yasmin (Petitioner) VS Pakistan International Air Lines & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2927 Const. P. 525/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Naseer Ahmed Bangwar (Petitioner) VS Wali Muhammad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2928 Const. P. 4002/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ms Sahar Gul Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2929 Const. P. 3362/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1431-K/2018 Shabbir Aslam v. Province of Sindh thr. Home Secy: Govt. of Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2930 Const. P. 7995/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Razia Sultana Tahir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakista and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.204/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & another v. Razia Sultana Tahir,C.A.1294/2019 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad & another v. Razia Sultana Tahir Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending Adjourned (Next Hearing: Week commencing 11-Mar-24)
2931 Const. P. 6733/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Senior Suprintendent Of Police And ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2932 Const. P. 71/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Manzoor Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.18-K/2019 Karachi Port Trust and others v. Manzoor Muhammad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2933 Const. P. 6893/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Rasheed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4685/2017 Abdul Rasheed and others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1612/2017 Abdul Rasheed and others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
2934 Const. P. 5537/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2935 Const. P. 6629/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Touseef Nazeer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.19-K/2019 Touseef Nazeer v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2936 H.C.A 376/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. & another (Appellant) VS Bheru Lal (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2937 Const. P. 5547/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr Aftab Haider Deeshak & Ors (Petitioner) VS SPSC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2938 Const. P. 3000/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayum Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2939 Const. P. 1769/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ms. Lamika Zuberi (Petitioner) VS M/s Logo Guru (Pvt) Ltd and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2940 Const. P. 5776/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes University of Karachi--we deem it appropriate to set aside the findings of the Selection Board dated 28.06.2018 to the extent of petitioners and private respondents. Consequently, the matter is remanded to the competent authority of respondent-University to determine afresh as to whether the candidates i.e. petitioners and private respondents were having requisite academic qualifications duly recognized under the law for the subject posts in respondent-University, at the time of the cutoff date provided in the public notice dated 26.12.2014. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.582-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Imran Ali Hashmi & others,C.P.733-K/2021 Dr.Masooda Qadri v. The University of Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
2941 Const. P. 2378/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2942 Const. P. 1254/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syeda Anis Sughra Jafri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2943 2019 PLC (CS) 1157 Const. P. 2268/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Attaullah Khan Chandio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2944 Const. P. 2442/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Shaikh Aadil Jamil (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2945 2019 PLC (CS) 917 Const. P. 4942/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Ayub Alvi (Petitioner) VS Admin Incharge P.C.S.I & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-MAR-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2946 2019 PLC (CS) Note 20 Const. P. 8306/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1001/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary, Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Mushtaq Ahmed Shaikh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
2947 Const. P. 1899/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Muneer & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.297/2018 Muhammed Muneer & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2948 2019 PLC Lab. 63 Const. P. 635/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/S Gerry (Petitioner) VS Learned Member NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.86-K/2018,C.P.84-K/2018,C.P.88-K/2018,C.P.83-K/2018,C.P.87-K/2018,C.P.85-K/2018 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
2949 Const. P. 6548/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bibi Hajra (Petitioner) VS The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1501-K/2021 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. Bibi Hajra & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
2950 Const. P. 6825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Kanwal Gul (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2951 Const. P. 1452/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mirza Muhammad Umar Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2952 Const. P. 1656/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Arham Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS M.D KW & SB and Oters (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2953 Const. P. 4579/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Qasim Ali (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2954 Const. P. 4305/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Musarat Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2955 2019 PLC (CS) Note 44 Const. P. 994/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS D.G CHO, Rawalpindi and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.370-K/2017 Arshad Ali v. The Director General (Services) G.H.Q and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
2956 Const. P. 3083/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 MIMA KNIT PVT LTD (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2957 Const. P. 4068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Fluid Technology International (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2958 Const. P. 462/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Mst. Ume Kalsoom (Petitioner) VS Tarique Khoso & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2959 Const. P. 5147/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Yasmeen Akhtar and ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2960 Const. P. 8357/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Premier Towels (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2961 Const. P. 335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s HRSG Outsourcing (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2962 Const. P. 2113/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 . (Petitioner) VS . (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2963 Cr.Bail 340/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Allahwasayo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2964 Cr.Misc. 398/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Nawab Ali (Applicant) VS Yawar Abbas & 3 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2965 2020 SBLR Sindh 913 Const. P. 628/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Rasool Bux Shar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-JAN-19 Yes Whether the Petitioner is entitled to payment of pensionary benefits of his 14 years??? service in PQA in addition to Contributory Provident Fund received by the Petitioner from KoFHA upon his retirement in the year 2008? pensionary benefits Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2966 Const. P. 376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2967 2022 PLC (CS) Note 1 Const. P. 3123/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rubina Bano and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2968 Const. P. 3365/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zubair Ahmed. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2969 Const. P. 2834/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2970 Const. P. 1260/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Attique Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2971 Const. P. 3205/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shafqat Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2972 Const. P. 3241/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoob Lanjwani (Petitioner) VS Director Left Bank Canal area (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2973 Const. P. 2566/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Waseem Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Waseem Sadiq (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2974 Const. P. 5632/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Mohsin Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2975 H.C.A 449/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Waseem Ahmed (Appellant) VS Muhammad Shahnawaz & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.712-K/2019 K-Elecric Ltd. v. Muhammad Shahnawaz and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
2976 Const. P. 674/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Latif &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2977 Const. P. 1619/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2978 Const. P. 1635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Shabana & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2979 Const. P. 250/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 SawanKhan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2980 Const. P. 528/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Aijaz Ali &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2981 Const. P. 681/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sher Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2982 Const. P. 1781/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Moazam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2983 Const. P. 794/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2984 Const. P. 2628/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Wahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2985 Const. P. 898/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahbaz Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Mola Bux and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2986 Const. P. 1142/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Naveed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2987 Const. P. 761/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ihsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2988 Const. P. 2123/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2989 Const. P. 1376/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Soofi Ali Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2990 Const. P. 3005/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hamal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2991 Const. P. 3177/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 WaliMuhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2992 Const. P. 2171/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shaman Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2993 Const. P. 3193/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muneer Ahmed Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2994 Const. P. 3119/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ahmed Amin Brohi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.526-K/2019 Ahmed Amin Brohi v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
2995 Const. P. 3692/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Irfan Jamil (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2996 Const. P. 8252/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sajida Parveen and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2997 I. A 27/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 M/S Quaraquram Cotton Ginners Factory &Oil Mills (Appellant) VS NBP Br,At Sanghar (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
2998 Const. P. 538/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arif and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
2999 Const. P. 2539/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Imran Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3000 Const. P. 1086/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 ( Master Abdul Jabbar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3001 Const. P. 3345/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Nangar Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3002 Const. P. 84/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imdad Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3003 I. A 49/2000 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Mashooq Ali Bhutto (Appellant) VS ADBP Hyd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3004 Const. P. 5278/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Waqar Haider and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3005 Const. P. 696/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Altaf Hussain Khowaja (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3006 Const. P. 2310/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Qadir Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3007 Const. P. 2071/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mithal Khan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3008 Const. P. 245/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Muhammad Younus & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal C.P.244-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Muhammad Younis and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3009 Const. P. 5784/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Salam Khatri (Petitioner) VS D.G MC & C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes Non prosecution--Since the issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others supra, this petition is not maintainable. The issue of transfer and posting from one Cantonment Board to another Cantonment Board has already been settled by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Tariq Iqbal and others. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3010 Const. P. 547/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Razia Rizwan (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3011 Const. P. 1446/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Rehman Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3012 Const. P. 2137/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3013 Const. P. 1587/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3014 Const. P. 2063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Achar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3015 2023 PLC Lab. Note 68 Const. P. 3065/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Rehan Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3016 Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-19 Yes Therefore, the review application merits dismissal, which is accordingly dismissed as, in our view, the judgment dated 06.09.2019 passed by this court was based on correct factual as well as legal position of the case and we do not find any inherent flaw floating on the surface of the record requiring our interference. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4105/2019,C.P.4144/2019,C.P.622-K/2019,C.P.4410/2019 SCP Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
3017 Const. P. 358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Noorunisa @ Fatima and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3018 Const. P. 78/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sharoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3019 Const. P. 1067/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Hassan Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3020 Const. P. 2087/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Shazia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3021 Const. P. 5479/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Kaleemullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3022 Const. P. 6955/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Sidra Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-19 Yes whether in the appointment of Respondent No.3, the discretion was rightly observed or not by the Competent Authority. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3023 Const. P. 4677/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Dr. Naeem Memon (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-SEP-19 Yes Whether supersession is punishment---in promotion matters to such post could not be made in a mechanical manner and a variety of factors, such as examination of service records, evaluation reports of training institutions, record of disciplinary proceedings, reputation of integrity and efficiency, suitability for handling particular assignment, etc. had to be taken into consideration--- NCA Employees Service Rules 2011, on the aforesaid proposition, the matter has been set at rest by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafique Ahmed Khan and others v. NESCOM through Chairman Islamabad and others (PLD 2016 SC 377)] therefore, question of declaring the Chapter II of the NCA Employees Service Rules 2011 as ultra vires of Section 9, 11 of the National Command Authority Act 2010 and Articles 4,9,10-A of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973 are not apropos at this stage for the reason discussed in the preceding paragraphs. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3024 Const. P. 3341/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Shabeer (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3025 Const. P. 1708/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3026 Const. P. 2276/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sadique Ali Sohani & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3027 Const. P. 2536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Yousuf Abrar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3028 Const. P. 899/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hameedullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3029 Const. P. 2221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rasool Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3030 Const. P. 917/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Jabbar Abid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3031 Const. P. 436/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Karim (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3032 Const. P. 2424/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Rehman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3033 Const. P. 635/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Akram & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3034 Const. P. 616/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) VS Raees Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-20 Yes private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi against unfair labour practice--From perusal of the above provisions of law, it is clear that the provisions of IRA-2012 are applicable where the establishment has trans-provincial character / position--Thus we maintain the common order dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Full Bench of NIRC--Dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3035 Const. P. 2576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes In view of the above discussion, the petitions are not maintainable either on facts or in law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for redressal of his grievance, whether such grievance is against a private party or a public functionary. Article 199 of the Constitution restricts such right only to an aggrieved person, as contemplated in the said Article, who is aggrieved by any action or order of a public functionary or department or the Provincial or Federal Government. A person coming to Court must be fully aware of his right i.e. whether he is entitled to such right or not. We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of the plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-CAA. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.449-K/2021 Javed Iqbal v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3036 Const. P. 2584/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Farzana Iqbal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1796/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Farzana Iqbal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3037 Const. P. 2729/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1797/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Urooj Fatima and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3038 Const. P. 153/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3039 Civil Revision 124/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khair Muhammad Brohi & others (Applicant) VS District Judge Matiari & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3040 Const. P. 4906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 Yes The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3041 Criminal Appeal 185/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3042 Criminal Miscelleneous 427/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hamid Ali (Applicant) VS 1st Adj. S.J/Ex.Officio J.P Tharparkar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3043 Const. P. 824/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 HAMZO HAN ZARDARAND OTHER (Petitioner) VS P.O SNDH AND OTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3044 Const. P. 6499/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Mashhood-uz-Zafar Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3045 Const. P. 408/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Mithal Lohach (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-20 Yes No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to assist this Court. This petition was filed in the month of January 2016, praying for initiation of an inquiry against the then Secretary, Education Department, Government of Sindh--In the above circumstances, this petition, being not maintainable and having become infructuous, is dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3046 Const. P. 2428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3047 Const. P. 115/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Ghulam Shabir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No In our view, a habeas corpus writ is to be issued only when the person concerning whose liberty, the petition has been filed, is illegally detained by respondents in the petition. On the basis of a habeas corpus petition the power under Article 199 of the constitution is not to be exercised for tracing a missing person engaging an investigating agency empowered to investigate a case under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The investigation, if in progress, is to be overseen by the criminal court. Here the petitioner is asking this court to direct the police to track down his missing wife and daughter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3048 Const. P. 2518/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Huma (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1795/2020 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills thr. its CEO/Chairman, Karachi v. Huma and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3049 Const. P. 7067/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Samreen Mazari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1800/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Samreen Mazari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3050 Cr.Misc. 147/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst. Waziran Khatoon (Applicant) VS The State & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3051 Const. P. 80/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Jalil & anothers (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3052 Const. P. 2112/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mst Haneefa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3053 Const. P. 6066/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Shahzad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3054 Const. P. 3478/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. the petitioner is seeking addition of the period, served with Civil Aviation Authority (`CAA`) on daily wages, against the substantive post of Storekeeper, with the period served as a regular employee, for the purpose of pensionary benefits---In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the respondents are directed to include daily wages employment of petitioner as his substantive service in regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. Respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and settle the service dues of the petitioner within sixty (60) days from the date of this judgment. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1661/2020 Civil Aviation Authority thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others v. Bashir Ahmed and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3055 I. A 34/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Hyder (Appellant) VS Asif Ali Khyber (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3056 R.A (Civil Revision) 56/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Wahid (Applicant) VS Punhoon (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3057 Const. P. 2687/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Santosh Kumar & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3058 Const. P. 4327/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mehtab Tahir Niazi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3059 Const. P. 630/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Mattul (Petitioner) VS Khair Muhammad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3060 Const. P. 557/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Ashfaque Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Government of sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3061 M.A. 10/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Fatima (Appellant) VS Umar Hayat & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3062 Const. P. 4521/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3063 Const. P. 6527/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Jalil (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3064 Const. P. 3764/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3065 2022 SBLR Sindh 1070 Const. P. 1480/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Maryam Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Chancellor Fed. Urdu University & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as ???University???), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. the petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court while calling in question the termination letter dated 26.02.2019 issued by the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology (hereinafter referred to as University), relieving her from the services of University with retrospective effect i.e. 20.10.2018, which according to the petitioner is without lawful authority and of no legal effect.---We are not satisfied with the assertion of the respondent-university on the aforesaid analogy, for the reason that Fundamental Rule 54, is clear in its terms, dealing with the reinstatement of the employee consequent to setting aside of his dismissal/removal from service, the entitlement of the employee, to have the period of his absence from his service treated as "on duty" is a statutory consequence of his being reinstated on the merits--This being the legal position of the case, the instant petition is allowed with no order as to costs by holding that the impugned termination order dated 26.02.2019 issued by respondent-university is without legal consequence. Thus, the service of the petitioner is reinstated with effect from termination of her service i.e. 14.02.2019. The respondents are directed to grant her service benefits for the intervening period in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3066 Const. P. 2546/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar (Petitioner) VS The Speaker Provincial Assembly and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-20 Yes Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. Petitioner has questioned his repatriation from the Secretariat of the Provincial Assembly of Sindh to his parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Sindh --In view of the above, petitioner is liable to return the entire amount received by him during the entire said period towards differential in the pay scale of BPS-9 to BPS-19 and respondents are duty-bound to recover such amount from him and deposit the same in the Government exchequer. The Secretary Education & Literacy Department, Government of Sindh, respondent No.2 / Secretary Provincial Assembly of Sindh and Accountant General Sindh, are jointly and severally directed to calculate the differential amount recoverable from the petitioner and to submit a statement in this behalf through MIT-II of this Court, without fail within eight (08) weeks from today. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1879/2020 Aftab Ahmed Mahar v. Speaker Provincial Assembly of Sindh, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3067 Const. P. 5851/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst. Saima Ather (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.937/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others,C.P.1755/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Mst. Saima Athar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.
3068 Const. P. 2520/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3069 Const. P. 636/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) VS The State & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3070 Const. P. 649/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3071 Criminal Appeal 12/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 JAVED & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3072 Const. P. 6389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Ansar Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3073 Const. P. 6209/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Asghar Babar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3074 Const. P. 1304/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Arbab Zakaullah and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3075 Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3076 Const. P. 7103/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-20 Yes release his monthly salary--whether the salary of the petitioner can be withheld without providing an opportunity of hearing? --In our view, he, who seeks equity, must do equity and approach the Court with clean hands, ill-gotten gains cannot be protected. It is argued by the learned AAG that the petitioner had got his appointment through the backdoor, thus cannot agitate any grievance on the pretext of denial of due opportunity of hearing to him--we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and since the Competent Authority has already determined the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims on the issue of appointment of non-teaching staff in the Directorate of School Education (Elementary/ Secondary / Higher Secondary Karachi), vide order dated 11.01.2019 on the subject as discussed supra, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained. On the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, we are guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3077 Const. P. 2334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Azam and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1794/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Muhammad Azam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3078 Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3079 2021 YLR 867 Const. P. 6168/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sardar Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3080 Const. P. 1702/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Hameedullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-21 Yes Enquiries and Anti-corruption Establishment Sindh (`E&ACE`) for issuance of his retirement notification and releasing his salaries up to 21.7.2013, wherein he has served for 10 years--In the light of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the competent authority of respondents/Home Secretary, Government of Sindh is directed to issue his retirement notification within two weeks and release his pensionary benefits under the law within a month from the date of receipt of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this court Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3081 Const. P. 6766/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Shoukat Qadri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 Yes pensionery benefits--Prim facie, the petitioner has qualifying length of service to his credit as per VSS calculation work sheet available at page-11 of the memo of petition. It is well settled law that no pension granted or continued to the pensioner is liable to seizure by the department under Pension Act, 1871, and the rules framed thereunder--In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to look into the matter of the petitioner and provide similar treatment to him as given by this Court to his colleagues Shakeel Ahmed and Anis Hyder in C.P No.D-5734/2018 and C.P No.D-6225/2018, respectively. pensionery benefits Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3082 2023 PLC Lab. Note 10 Const. P. 2341/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in the Federal Service Tribunal (FST) but their appeals were abated and thereafter they filed these petitions before this Court---In the light of judgment passed by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed supra which was implemented by the respondents in letter and spirit, we are not convinced with the argument of learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioners are not entitled to the financial benefits with effect from the date of their demotion in year 2003, rather from year 2012---In the light of findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan vide orders dated 24.3.2010 and 20.5.2010 in the aforesaid proceedings, these petitions are allowed with no order as to costs by directing the competent authority of respondents to re-calculate the pensionery benefits of the petitioners and other benefits as admissible under the law with effect from their demotion and reduction in increment. Such amount must be deposited with the Nazir of this Court within a period of one (01) month which shall be paid to the petitioners on proper verification and confirmation. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3083 Const. P. 8984/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Farzana Shafiq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner??? late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner??? late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Having failed to seek family pension on the basis of the family assistance package, the petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court seeking directions to the management of PTVC to grant her family pension--In view of the above discussion, this petition is allowed with no order as to costs and the competent authority of respondents is directed to include temporary employment of petitioner late husband as his substantive service as regular for the purpose of service dues and other allied pensionary benefits. The competent authority of respondents are further directed to complete the entire exercise and recalculate and settle the pensionary / service dues of the petitioner late husband within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1756/2020 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another,C.A.4164/2022 Managing Director, Pakistan Television Corp. Ltd(PTVC), Islamabad and another v. Farzana Shafique and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3084 Const. P. 714/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Qabil Rind & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3085 Const. P. 1008/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3086 Criminal Appeal 108/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Hanif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3087 Const. P. 343/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Mateen Shopping Galaxy (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3088 Const. P. 7562/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dhani Baksh Baloch (Petitioner) VS N.B.P and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3089 Const. P. 6530/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Jabbar Lashari (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3090 Const. P. 4646/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Z.A Quraishi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. Prima facie, the calculation made by the respondent No.2 is not correct for the reason that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan directed to determine the pension from the date of restoration of their commuted pension at the rate at which they were drawing 50% remaining pension which means that the petitioner at the time of his retirement commuted his 50% pension and that portion of pension is to be increased after a period of 15 years (commuted period). As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, As per record, the increases made on commuted pension have already been drawn by him, therefore, his claim that at the time of restoration of his commuted portion he was drawing Rs.28211.03 and increases to be made in that amount is misconceived. The calculation prepared by respondent as well as Accountant General Sindh is in accord with the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, therefore, we are satisfied with the same. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3091 Const. P. 2268/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Akbar Leghari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.383-K/2020 Ali Akber v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3092 Criminal Appeal 109/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arshad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3093 I. A 9/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mushtaque Ali (Appellant) VS UBL (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3094 Const. P. 5344/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shafique Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS The Administrator KMC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 No The Chief Secretary Sindh is directed to ensure that in future postings should not be denied or delayed by the department concerned, and in any such event if an application / representation / complaint seeking posting is filed by the appointee before the Secretary / Head of the department concerned, the same must be decided by the said Secretary / Head within fifteen (15) days strictly in accordance with law. The above direction shall also be followed in case of applications / representations / complaints by an employee against his transfer. Let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary Sindh, the Secretaries of all the departments in the Government of Sindh, and the Heads of KMC, KDA, MDA and SBCA for compliance. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3095 Const. P. 797/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Gulzar Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3096 Const. P. 5647/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghazala Mughal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3097 Const. P. 5391/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes In view of the statement of learned AAG, let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who are facing disciplinary proceedings or criminal cases, and enjoying the posting even those who entered into plea bargaining and Voluntary Return (VR) under the NAB law. To be listed on 21.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3098 Const. P. 5503/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Ahad Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.793-K/2022 Abdul Ahad Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3099 Civil Revision 186/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ashraf (Applicant) VS Maqsood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3100 Const. P. 6275/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS D.J South Khi (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-20 Yes ACR--Admittedly, the Petitioner is a Civil Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal which has the exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of Civil Servants working in Sindh Subordinate Judiciary under the law and the petitioner has a right to file an appeal against the impugned order adversely affecting the terms and condition of his service before the Tribunal subject to the qualification provided therein. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3101 Const. P. 483/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Bakhmina (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-20 Yes In view of the above, this petition is allowed with the direction to the competent authority of the respondent-police department to take the decision afresh as to whether Constable Amjad Ali embraced Shahadat on 26.12.2012 or his case does not fall under the criteria for Shaheed as per The Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act-2014.The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within two (2) months from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3102 Const. P. 5639/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Karim and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-21 Yes promotion case Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3103 Const. P. 1296/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3104 Const. P. 5850/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zeeshan Usman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. The case of the petitioners, in nutshell, is that they were appointed in Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. (SSGC) as Executive in Information Technology and Medical Services Department in Grade-I respectively, on contract basis vide office letter dated 14.11.2012. They continued to serve them till 31.12.2017, but their services were not regularized---In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby the competent authority of respondent-company is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without any discrimination for regularization of their service in accordance with law, and dicta laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court vide unreported order dated 12.03.2018 passed in Civil Petitions No.67-K and 68-K of 2018, as discussed in the preceding paragraph, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment--Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1754/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others,C.A.936/2020 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited thr. its attorney S.M. Hassan Meerza v. Zeeshan Usmani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.status quo be maintained.,Disposed Allowed
3105 Const. P. 2735/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Ravi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-20 Yes In view of the above, the competent authority of respondents is directed to consider the case of the petitioner-widow for her family pension if her deceased husband had a requisite length of service to claim pensionary benefits on account of family pension. The aforesaid exercise shall be completed by a speaking order within one month from the date of receipt of this order after hearing the petitioner. By consent, this petition is disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3106 Const. P. 6536/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3107 Const. P. 5579/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Shah Muhammad Khan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3108 Const. P. 6541/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rashid Rafi (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3109 Const. P. 940/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haroon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3110 Const. P. 382/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Pir Abdul Malik (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Zakriya & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3111 Const. P. 566/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr Raza Khalique (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3112 Const. P. 292/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Ume-e-Rubab & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3113 Const. P. 978/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3114 2022 PLC (CS) 150 Const. P. 1679/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mazhar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3115 Const. P. 6532/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Gul Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3116 Const. P. 735/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3117 Const. P. 758/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rafiq and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3118 Const. P. 827/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Irfan Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 Yes The petition thus does not require any consideration and indulgence and is accordingly dismissed along with listed applications. However, the petitioners are at liberty to seek appointment on differently-abled quota as and when the public notice is issued in the newspapers. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3119 Const. P. 2969/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3120 Cr.Bail 322/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Riaz and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3121 Const. P. 1633/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Munhadar Raza Shah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3122 Const. P. 16/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 General Secretary Fayaz Education Society Hyd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Javed Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.768-K/2020 General Secretary Fayaz Education Society Latifabad Hyderabad. v. Muhammad Javed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
3123 Const. P. 3784/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mst. Sakina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and 06 others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 Yes pension matter Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3124 Const. P. 253/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Azma & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3125 Const. P. 140/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Engr: Munir Ahmed Unar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3126 2023 PLC (CS) 1133 Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed
3127 2021 PLD Sindh Note 103 Const. P. 139/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nadeem Zuberi (Petitioner) VS C.A.A (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-20 No It is the case of the petitioner that it was specifically stated by him in his above application for withdrawal of the petition that the same was being filed by him as the respondent had assured him that his post-retirement benefits will be disbursed in his favour immediately upon withdrawal of the petition---In view of the above admitted position, we are of the view that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner stood abated, and resultantly his status, for the time being, is that of a retired employee of the respondent for all legal intent and purposes--Such an absurd situation cannot be allowed to happen as ; firstly, it is a well-settled and consistent view of the Superior Courts that matters should be decided on merits rather than depriving a party on technical grounds ; secondly, it is the duty of the Court to ensure dispensation of justice by setting the controversy before it at rest ; and lastly, this Court, under its inherent powers, can allow restoration of the petition so that the petitioner may get a fair opportunity of decision of his case on merits. It may be observed that the question of restoration of a case or application, as the case may be, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case--Our above view is fortified by the following cases. In H. M. Saya & Co. Karachi V/S Wazir Ali Industries Ltd., Karachi and another, PLD 1969 SC 65--In view of the above discussion, the listed application is allowed with no order as to costs, and resultantly the petition is restored to its original position. Needless to say the observations made herein shall not affect the merits or demerits of the case of either of the parties to the petition, which shall be decided on merits in accordance with law. It is the case of the petitioner that it was specifically stated by him in his above application for withdrawal of the petition that the same was being filed by him as the respondent had assured him that his post-retirement benefits will be disbursed in his favour immediately upon withdrawal of the petition---In view of the above admitted position, we are of the view that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner stood abated, and resultantly his status, for the time being, is that of a retired employee of the respondent for all legal intent and purposes--Such an absurd situation cannot be allowed to happen as ; firstly, it is a well-settled and consistent view of the Superior Courts that matters should be decided on merits rather than depriving a party on technical grounds ; secondly, it is the duty of the Court to ensure dispensation of justice by setting the controversy before it at rest ; and lastly, this Court, under its inherent powers, can allow restoration of the petition so that the petitioner may get a fair opportunity of decision of his case on merits. It may be observed that the question of restoration of a case or application, as the case may be, would depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case--Our above view is fortified by the following cases. In H. M. Saya & Co. Karachi V/S Wazir Ali Industries Ltd., Karachi and another, PLD 1969 SC 65--In view of the above discussion, the listed application is allowed with no order as to costs, and resultantly the petition is restored to its original position. Needless to say the observations made herein shall not affect the merits or demerits of the case of either of the parties to the petition, which shall be decided on merits in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1156/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi,C.A.445/2021 Civil Aviation Authority, Karachi v. Nadeem Zuberi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Dismissed
3128 Const. P. 6999/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shabbir Aslam (Petitioner) VS The Adjutant General & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-20 Yes He assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon???ble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed He assailed the aforesaid order before the Honble Supreme Court in C.P No.428-K of 2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.08.2019 with the observation that the petitioner, if he has any other subsisting grievance against the respondents, may avail his remedy in accordance with law.--Petitioner, who is present in person, states that his cause of action against the respondents still subsists, therefore, he has approached this Court. We are not satisfied with the aforesaid assertion of the petitioner for the simple reason that Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan restricts this Court for making an order on application made by or in relation to a person who is a member of armed forces of Pakistan or who is for the time being subject to any law relating to any of those Forces in respect of his terms and conditions of service or in respect of any matter arising out of his service, or in respect of any action taken in relation to him as a member of the Armed Forces or as a person subject to such law.--dismissed Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.195-K/2020 Shabbir Aslam v. The Adjutant General and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3129 Const. P. 747/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Khanan through his legal heirs (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Tando Allahyar & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3130 Const. P. 3247/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Prof: Syed Farhat Ali Jaffery (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. By means of this petition, the petitioner has impugned office order dated 30.05.2016 whereby his extra assignment of the post of Principal, Karachi Medical & Dental College, KMC, in addition to his own duties, was cancelled / withdrawn--Admittedly, the petitioner is Government Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the terms and conditions of his service. In our view, a Government Servant has no vested right to claim a particular assignment in addition to his own duties forever or for a stipulated period as a matter of right. The respondents have already cancelled / withdrawn the aforesaid assignment vide Office Order dated 30.05.2016, which does not call for any interference-Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3131 Const. P. 1826/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ayaz Hussain Khichi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3132 Const. P. 699/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Katoo and others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3133 Const. P. 298/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ali Gohar & another (Petitioner) VS Abdullah Mallah & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.727-K/2020 Ali Gohar & another v. Abdullah Mallah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3134 Criminal Appeal 186/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3135 Const. P. 574/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Rehman Rajput (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1287-K/2020 Abdul Rehman Rajput v. The District Judge Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3136 Const. P. 2271/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Shama Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners were initially appointed by Pakistan Steel Mills and presently performing their duties as teaching and non-teaching staff in the Education Department of Pakistan Steel in terms of letters of contracts issued by Hadeed Welfare Trust for the last many years and are seeking regularization of their contractual services on the strength of order dated 21.03.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition Nos.121-K and 122-K of 2017---Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of in terms of orders dated 21.03.2017 and 03.06.2019 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid matters, with no order as costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1793/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Ms. Shama Hassan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3137 Const. P. 285/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Mustafa Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3138 Const. P. 3107/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ahsan H Khuwaja (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3139 Const. P. 8261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Attaullah Arbab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-20 Yes Repatriation from the post of Additional Deputy Commissioner-I, Hyderabad to his parent department i.e. Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. vide Notification dated 12.2.2016 issued by Chief Secretary--whether the petitioner was qualified to be inducted from Sui Southern Gas Company in Sindh Government on deputation for three years' And, whether the Chief Minister, Sindh was competent to nominate the petitioner as Assistant Commissioner in Ex-PCS cadre under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964? and, whether his repatriation to his parent department is in accord with the direction given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court?--It is well-settled law that a deputationist does not have any vested right to remain on the post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period. He can be repatriated to his parent department at any time. The Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Shafiur Rehman Afridi v. CDA, 2010 SCMR 378, has settled the issue on the aforesaid proposition. Therefore, no further deliberation is required by us--In our view, since the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid matters is still in the field, we are bound to follow it under the Constitution. Besides the respondents have issued the impugned notification in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid proceedings, therefore, no indulgence of this Court is required in the present matter--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3140 I. A 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 National Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) VS Abdul Sattar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3141 2022 YLR 450 Const. P. 28/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Arsalan Aijaz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sanober & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3142 Const. P. 177/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Jithendra & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1281-K/2020 Barkat Ali v. Jithendra & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3143 Const. P. 6845/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Juanid Ahmed Sarki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 Yes Deceased quota-- Petitioner???s case if not approved by the competent authority may seek his remedy, if any, before the competent forum in accordance with law. Deceased quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3144 Const. P. 644/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Aneeta & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3145 Const. P. 1975/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Pir Ashfaq Ahmed Sarhandi & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3146 Const. P. 925/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Jamal Khan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3147 Const. P. 865/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst. Nazia & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3148 Civil Revision 178/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ghulam Hyder and 10 others (Applicant) VS Zulfiqar Ali and 13 others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3149 Suit 23/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 GUL AHMED TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED (Plaintiff) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-JAN-21 No KCR and Pakistan Railway dispute on land matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3150 Const. P. 7530/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mir Nusrat Ali Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3151 Const. P. 1895/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Faiza Gul (Petitioner) VS Zubaid Gul and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Since the question of law has been answered accordingly; therefore, the above observation on the other points is tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the either party in their other family matter if any pending before the court of law which shall be decided independently in accordance with law. Disposed of. Since the question of law has been answered accordingly; therefore, the above observation on the other points is tentative in nature which shall not prejudice the either party in their other family matter if any pending before the court of law which shall be decided independently in accordance with law. Disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4816/2019 Mst. Faiza Gul v. Zubaid Gul & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3152 Const. P. 1688/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mehrumal (Petitioner) VS D.O, Water Management NPIW, Mirpurkhas and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3153 Const. P. 537/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Said Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3154 Const. P. 1162/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Shabbir Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3155 Const. P. 6328/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Rashid and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Case of the petitioners is that they were appointed purely on temporary contract basis in the ADP schemes / projects viz. Youth Health Awareness Program (YHAP), Establishment of Mobile Skill Development Unit for Underprivileged Youth (EMSDUUY) and Benazir Bhutto Shaheeed Youth Development Porgramme (BBSYDP), in the years 2009, 2012 and 2013 till completion of the projects. After completion of the projects, their services stood discontinued as per terms of their appointment orders--The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3156 Const. P. 2512/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abrar Ali Khichi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3157 Const. P. 2835/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Immaduddin Langah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3158 Const. P. 5273/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asia Kausar Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1394/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Asia Kausar Ali and others,C.P.5137/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Asia Kausar Ali and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months
3159 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 547/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3160 Const. P. 2556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hafiz Syed Naveed Qamar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3161 Const. P. 1355/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Yasir Shabbir and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1383/2021,C.P.5126/2021,C.P.3992/2022,C.A.4018/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3162 Const. P. 2707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shah Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-APR-21 Yes the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to award him incentive of timescale i.e. BPS-17 to BPS-19, from the date of his entitlement; and, other ancillary benefits, to bring him at par with the employees of other departments of Government of Sindh--whether the petitioner is entitled to the incentive of the timescale from BPS-17 to BPS-19 under the law or otherwise. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3163 Const. P. 3935/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Al-Zarina Glass Bangle and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3164 Const. P. 169/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Fajjar Din (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-21 Yes This Constitutional Petition has been filed under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, praying this Court to issue a writ of certiorari/ mandamus to call for the records relating to the Compulsory Retirement Order dated 01.11.2012 and Appellate Order dated 30.10.2017 passed by the respondent-Airport Security Force (hereinafter referred to as `ASF'), and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to reinstate services of the petitioner as an Inspector (ASF). Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.760-K/2021 Mr. Fajjar Din v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3165 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 556/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3166 Const. P. 5332/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Fahad Arshad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1377/2021,C.P.5120/2021,C.P.1094-K/2022,C.A.3993/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3167 Const. P. 4262/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Sun Textile Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3168 Const. P. 128/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s. Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5639/2021 M/s Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3169 Const. P. 1242/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Shakoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 Yes termination from service--Baqai Cadet College, Karachi--It is a well-settled principle of law that the appointment on contract and its subsequent expiration on the aforesaid charges cannot be threshed out through these proceedings and the petitioner cannot be ordered to be reinstated in service in absence of statutory rules of service. Resultantly, this Petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3170 Const. P. 7131/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Naveed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.809-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & others v. Naseer Ahmed Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3171 Const. P. 3013/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mactor International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3172 Const. P. 2208/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/S STI Ind and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3173 Const. P. 6113/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Sajid Ali Shah Jeelani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3174 Const. P. 3100/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-21 Yes whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.3922/2021 Managing Director Pakistan Bait ul Mal, Islamabad v. Surriya Kanwal and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3175 Const. P. 4603/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Ind (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2-K/2022 Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
3176 Const. P. 6047/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Asif Mehmood & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1084-K/2022 Asif Mehmood & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Petroleum and Natural Resources Islamabad & others,C.A.3988/2022 Asif Mehmood & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Petroleum and Natural Resources Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3177 Const. P. 3969/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zain Suhail (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3178 Const. P. 8065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Latif Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4384/2021 Employees Old Age Benefits Institution (EOBI) & others v. Abdul Latif Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.10973/21 for impleadment is Dismissed as not pressed.
3179 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 551/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3180 Const. P. 4767/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Hanif and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3181 Const. P. 3271/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bilqees (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1164/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others,C.A.1349/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed after 3 months,Pending
3182 M.A. 44/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd (Appellant) VS The Court of District Judge, Khi (East) & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.813-K/2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Limited v. The Court of District & Sessions Judge East at Karachi. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
3183 Const. P. 1156/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Tapal Energy (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3184 Const. P. 855/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Anwar Ahmed & 34 Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3185 Const. P. 219/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Asim Sualeh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-21 Yes Petitioner has assailed the vires of show cause notice dated 30.12.2016 issued by respondent-Port Qasim Authority (PQA), whereby he has been called upon to explain his position concerning his initial appointment as Deputy General Manager / Director in BPS-20 in PQA-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3186 Const. P. 6115/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3187 Const. P. 6847/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Wazeer Ali Khushk and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3188 2023 PLC CS 700 Const. P. 63/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Iqbal Naseem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-21 Yes Shaheed quota Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3189 Const. P. 1700/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sindh Technical Education (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3190 Const. P. 4431/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zaheeruddin Babar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3191 Const. P. 1734/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Irum & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3192 Cr.Bail 258/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Raheem Bux (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3193 Const. P. 3881/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 K.U.E.C.H.S (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3194 Const. P. 1202/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aftab Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-MAR-21 Yes SESSI Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.586-K/2021 Sindh Employees Social Security Institution v. Aftab Alam & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3195 Const. P. 161/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Karim Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3196 Const. P. 7132/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Tariq Mateen (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3197 Const. P. 6309/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Naeem Akhtar Khan (Petitioner) VS NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAR-21 Yes we queried from the learned counsel for the Petitioner as to how this Petition is maintainable in its form against the National Command Authority (NCA) under the National Command Authority (Amendment) Act, 2016; besides that SUPARCO, comes under the definition of NCA as provided under clause (A) of Section 2 of the NCA Act, 2010. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3198 Const. P. 4989/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Imdad Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 Yes Needless to mention that mere allegation that respondent No.2 is biased is not sufficient to avoid least delay of conclusion of the inquiry. Needless to add that inquiry officer is bound to conduct to impartial inquiry and submit report to the competent authority; hence at this premature stage we are not inclined to interfere with the inquiry proceedings merely on uttering of word biasness when there has been placed nothing on record to substantiate such allegation. Accordingly, petition is dismissed in limine along with listed applications. However, with directions to respondent No.2 that he shall conduct inquiry by providing all rights of hearing and complete the same preferably within one monthbeing SSP, is enjoying his position as SSP Sujawal and inquiry is pending since 2018, yet same has not been completed which is shocking, particularly when it relates to irregular appointment under directives of Honourable Apex Court. The competent officer(s), surprisingly, yet failed to conduct inquiry within stipulated period---Without prejudice to this denovo inquiry has been notified, hence, petitioner cannot chose a particular officer and manner of inquiry other than provided under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3199 Const. P. 535/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M. Qasim Jakhar (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes Enforcement of decision of SST---Besides above, the point of laches is also involved in this matter on the ground that the petitioner has approached this court in the year 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007 when he was purportedly terminated from his service, the reasoning assigned by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has approached this court based on decision passed by the learned SST in the year 2010; that a constitutional petition involving violation and infringement of fundamental rights of the citizens could not be thrown out on the ground of delay in filing the same. We do not concur with this assertion of the learned counsel for the Petitioner with his explanation of laches as rights of the petitioner were not dependent upon other petitioners in the referred petition. We are of the considered view that the instant Petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the Petitioner filed the instant Petition in January 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in the year 2007, i.e. approximately 08 years before the filing of the instant Petition. It is well-settled law that those who slept over their rights cannot be given a premium of their own fault because such conduct does trigger the principle of waiver. The observations of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) is a guiding principle on the issue of laches. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3200 Cr.Bail 185/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Pathan Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-JUL-21 Yes For the aforesaid reasons, the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant vide order dated 30.4.2021 is hereby confirmed. However, the applicant is required to furnish further solvent surety in the sum of Rs.50000/- (Fifty Thousand Rupees) and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court within one week from today. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3201 Const. P. 4417/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-21 Yes that the petitioner has been placed on as an Officer on Special Duty (OSD) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5297/2021 Trustees of the Karachi Port thr. its Board of Trustees, Karachi & others v. Dr. Mazhar Ali Jatoi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3202 Const. P. 357/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Sijawal (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3203 Const. P. 1892/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Akhtar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1402/2021,C.P.5145/2021,C.P.1205-K/2022,C.A.4004/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3204 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 559/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3205 Const. P. 4486/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mian Mushtaq A. Sajid (Petitioner) VS Dr. Shireen Narejo and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3206 Const. P. 4668/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: CP D-1917/2017 attached 2015 Lucky Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes Petitioner employers sought declaration that demand of contributions by the Federal EOBI under EOBI Act 1976 is illegal as EOBI became federal subject after 18th Amendment and subsequent Sindh EOBI Act 2014; Sindh Province did enact the Act 2014 but could not establish the Institution; CCI resolved EOBI shall remain with Federal Government. Held petitioners cant take benefit of dispute between the Federation and Province; priority must be given to the employees as the Old Age Benefit law is a beneficial law, aimed for the benefit of the employees therefore in case contribution amount is not received by the EOBI ultimately it is the employees who will suffer. Hence these petitions are disposed of in terms that petitioners shall deposit the contributions and other dues according to EOBI Act 1976; all amount deposited with the Nazir shall be returned in favour of the EOBI established under the EOBI Act 1976. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3207 Const. P. 4452/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-APR-21 Yes Son Quota Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3208 Const. P. 5172/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imran Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shafique and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3209 Const. P. 6903/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ishaq Lashari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.201-K/2022 Muhammad Ishaque Lashari & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3210 Const. P. 1604/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Qayyum and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1103-K/2022 Abdul Rahim & others. v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Resources Islamabad & others,C.A.3997/2022 Abdul Rahim & others. v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Resources Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3211 Const. P. 824/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abida Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3212 Const. P. 4450/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mehtab Singh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3213 Cr.Misc. 194/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Shahbaz Ali Seelro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3214 Const. P. 2665/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 No To ascertain as to whether the respondent-Sindh Building Control Authority, has complied with the directions contained in the order dated 22.01.2019 passed by the Honble Supreme Court in the aforesaid matter in its letter and spirit in respect of the issue of conversion of amenity plot for another use or otherwise. Let notice be issued to the respondents as well as to learned AAG for 04.05.2021 with direction to file comments. In view of the above position of the case; and, to ascertain the factual position of the subject premises, let at the first instance inspection of the subject premises be carried out by the Nazir of this Court strictly under law, after due notice to all concerned Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3215 Const. P. 3463/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Khalid & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3216 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 572/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3217 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 307/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 The Collector MCC & another (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3218 Cr.Bail 273/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Muhammad Ali Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3219 Const. P. 6604/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nasim Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3220 Const. P. 3585/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Misri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 Yes termination--Sindh Madressatul Islam University Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3221 Const. P. 5467/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jamal Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 Yes Admittedly the petitioner is/was a civil servant and the question of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him ought to have been assailed before the learned Sindh Service Tribunal under section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974, however, he remained silent for the considerable time and purportedly preferred mercy appeal for reinstatement in service in the year 2008 followed by another application in the year 2020. Besides that, the disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question under Article 199 of the Constitution to set aside the dismissal from service order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3222 Cr.J.A 13/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Turab Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3223 Cr.Misc. 193/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Manzoor Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3224 Const. P. 8004/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2938/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.479/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
3225 Const. P. 2201/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif Ansari and Ors (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Televison Corp. and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-JUN-21 Yes the foremost questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the re-designation / induction of the private respondents as Producer Programs (G-5) was/is suffering from inherent disqualification under the PTVC rules, and whether the private respondents are holders of the public office, therefore, fall within the purview of sub-clause 1(b) (ii) of Article 199 of the Constitution and this Court has jurisdiction to entertain this petition? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1075-K/2021 Muhammad Asif Ansari & another v. Pakistan Television Corporation through its Managing Director & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3226 Const. P. 5755/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Qadir Bux & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3112/2021 Abdul Ghani and others v. Qadir Bux and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3227 Const. P. 3668/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dadan Khan Pirzado and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3228 Const. P. 1862/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rao Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 Yes disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Police Department--Rule 3(a) (b) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rule, 1988--disciplinary proceedings initiated against him which falls within the ambit of Section 3(2) of the Sindh Service Tribunal Act, 1974 which provides that the tribunal shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants including the disciplinary matters. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3229 2023 SBLR Sindh 1193 Cr.Bail 279/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Badal Bariro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3230 Const. P. 6344/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3231 Const. P. 580/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3232 Cr.Bail 580/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Aslam Muhammad Bakhsh and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3233 Cr.Bail 770/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mashooque Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3234 Cr.Bail 926/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sajan Laghari (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3235 Const. P. 201/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Nabi Bux and Others (Petitioner) VS Land Acquisition Officer (B&R) and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3236 Const. P. 503/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Vishandas (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3237 Cr.Bail 2350/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED MUHAMMAD FARHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.473/2021, registered under Section 6/9-C of the CNS Act, 1997 ---The guilt or innocence of the applicant is yet to be established as it would depend on the strength and quality of the evidence produced / to be produced by the prosecution and the defense before the trial Court. Therefore, it is clarified that the observations made herein are tentative which shall not prejudice the case of either party or shall influence the trial Court in any manner in deciding the case strictly on merits under law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3238 Const. P. 666/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ghulam Murshid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3239 Const. P. 917/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Mukhtaran (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3240 Const. P. 366/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Arsalan (Petitioner) VS NAB & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3241 Const. P. 1931/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Vishandas (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3242 Const. P. 683/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Fawad Fatah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3243 Const. P. 735/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Arsh (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3244 Const. P. 770/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Salman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.L.A.1712-K/2021 Salman Qureshi v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3245 Const. P. 1655/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Junaid Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.6282/2021 Junaid Ahmed v. Province of Sindh, through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Sindh Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3246 Criminal Miscelleneous 283/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHOSO S/O MUHAMMAD HASHIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes Obviously, criminal cases are decided based on the material so collected by the prosecution during the investigation, and the evidence recorded in the trial Court, and that too, after appraisal of evidence by it under the law applicable thereto. This Court cannot assume the role of an investigation agency or of a trial Court to deliberate upon the factual controversies involved in the present case in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. This view has been consistently enunciated by the Honorable Supreme Court that High Court ought to refrain from exercising inherent jurisdiction, during the investigation of a criminal case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3247 Const. P. 721/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mohammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3248 Const. P. 734/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farhana Jan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3249 Const. P. 748/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Agha Shahi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3250 Civil Revision 224/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 P.O Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Ahmed Nawaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3251 Const. P. 944/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Bano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3252 Civil Revision 240/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sarwar Ali (Applicant) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3253 Cr.Bail 860/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 AMEER MAVIYA @ MAVIYA & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.146-K/2021 Ameer Maviya @ Maviya & others v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3254 Civil Revision 260/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Hameed (Applicant) VS Mst Irshat Begum (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3255 Civil Revision 154/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Province Of Sindh and Ors (Applicant) VS Jalil Ahmed and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3256 Const. P. 943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 S & Sons Contractor (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3257 Cr.Bail 923/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rajab Ali & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.152-K/2021 Rajab Ali Shah & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh,Crl.A.17-K/2021 Rajab Ali Shah & another v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3258 Const. P. 361/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Rasheed (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3259 Const. P. 256/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Sajid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3260 Criminal Miscelleneous 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 NAZAKAT ABBAS (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE HYD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3261 Civil Revision 317/2010 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Esso (Applicant) VS Zahid Hussain (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3262 Const. P. 701/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Agha Shahi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3263 Const. P. 703/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farah Safdar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3264 Const. P. 729/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3265 Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3266 Const. P. 759/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Athar Ali (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3267 Const. P. 764/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mir Behram Talpur (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3268 Const. P. 765/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3269 Const. P. 792/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sagar Ladhani (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3270 Const. P. 753/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Agha Shahi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3271 Const. P. 962/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Syed Ashraf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3272 Const. P. 842/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zaheer Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3273 Civil Revision 159/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Manu and others (Applicant) VS Haji Sardar Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3274 Const. P. 1198/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3275 Const. P. 688/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imran (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3276 Civil Revision 116/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1998 Yousuf (Applicant) VS Muhammad Anwar (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3277 Cr.Misc. 652/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 ZULFIQAR ALI (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL DADU & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3278 Const. P. 720/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Awais Anwar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3279 Const. P. 692/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Farah Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3280 Const. P. 731/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Amad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3281 Const. P. 744/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3282 Const. P. 1848/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asif Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3283 Const. P. 1569/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mst. Hamida Begum (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3284 Cr.Rev 42/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imran Ali (Applicant) VS Mst Shahina Irfan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3285 Const. P. 1348/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3286 Const. P. 1184/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Siddique Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3287 Const. P. 3542/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s UBL (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Afzal Solangi and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3288 Const. P. 7271/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Urban Properties (Petitioner) VS Pakistan C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3289 M.A. 41/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Khan Muhammad & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3290 Const. P. 6259/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Syeda Anisa Bano (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3291 Const. P. 567/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.2990/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Ahsan Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3292 Const. P. 3308/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Apna TV Channels (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1719/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. M/s Apna Tv Channel (Pvt). Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3293 Const. P. 896/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3294 Const. P. 3698/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nadeemuddin Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes The short question is whether compulsory retirement of the petitioner on the aforesaid grounds would be a valid exercise of the powers; and, whether such a purpose could be termed to be in the public interest? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3295 Const. P. 5819/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Kareem (Petitioner) VS M/s Trading Co. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3296 M.A. 31/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Kirshan & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3297 Const. P. 5391/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sajid Akbar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-22 Yes We, therefore, in absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case-law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Pakistan Armed Forces in service-related matters according to their applicable laws. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3298 Const. P. 773/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ayaz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3299 Const. P. 849/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Azra Mehmood (Petitioner) VS Principal Secretary to Chief Minister & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3300 Const. P. 5975/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Toufiq Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Atomic Energy and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1726/2023 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) through its Secretary Islamabad v. Mohammad Taufique Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3301 Const. P. 1906/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pasban Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAR-22 No Political interest cannot be enforced through the process of Court under Article 199 of the Constitution under the garb of a Public Interest Litigation. It is the duty of Court to discourage such petitions and to ensure that the course of justice is not obstructed or polluted by unscrupulous litigants by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court for personal matters under the garb of the public interest litigation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3302 Const. P. 5494/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Fawwad Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3303 Const. P. 1482/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Ishaque and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3304 Const. P. 2966/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Urban Properties (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3305 Const. P. 2853/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s B.P Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3306 Const. P. 5121/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s CSM Pakistan (Guarantee) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3307 Const. P. 5862/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Aslam Awan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.492/2022 Karachi Water & Sewerage Board (KW&SB), Karachi through its Chairman v. Muhammad Aslam Awan and others,C.P.285-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Aslam Awan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed
3308 Const. P. 6009/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sajid Ali Shahani and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.474-K/2022 Sajid Ali Shahni Baloch & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3309 Const. P. 2909/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Universal Cables Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3310 Const. P. 3769/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muneer and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3311 Const. P. 429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mushtaque Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3312 Const. P. 936/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Murad Ali Abro and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3313 Const. P. 556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shahnawaz Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3314 Const. P. 4497/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muntazir Mehdi & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 Yes The petitioners who are serving as Deputy Prosecutor Generals in the prosecution department Government of Sindh contend that they are holding the LLM Degree and have claimed LLM degree allowance through this petition based on equality. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.501-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Muntazir Mehdi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3315 Const. P. 2146/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3316 Const. P. 2649/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Daniyal Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3317 Const. P. 3751/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naz Parveen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3318 Const. P. 3312/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1720/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3319 Const. P. 951/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Shah Jamali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3320 Const. P. 322/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sher Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3321 Const. P. 7229/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Capt. Rizwan Saif Khan Ghouri (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.768-K/2022 Port Qasim Authority through its Chairman & another v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3322 Const. P. 2145/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Hasnain Tanweer Associates (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3323 Const. P. 2729/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Patel Foundation and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3324 Const. P. 128/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asad Ali Laghari & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3325 Const. P. 2160/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Ali Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.567-K/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Maritime Affairs Government of Pakistan & others v. Syed Ali Zafar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3326 Const. P. 1436/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/S Irfan Noman Bernas (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3327 Const. P. 5282/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Rashida Syed (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 Yes It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3328 Const. P. 5500/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Waris khaki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3329 Const. P. 1859/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Hassan Naseer and Others (Petitioner) VS KM & DC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3330 Const. P. 1028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Jabbar and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3331 Const. P. 1330/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Asad Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3332 Const. P. 629/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Allah Bux & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3333 Const. P. 683/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muneer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
3334 Const. P. 366/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Rukhana & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3335 Const. P. 545/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ismail Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3336 Cr.J.A 190/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nazeer (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.A.222/2022 Zia ur Rehman v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh,J.P.499/2022 Nazeer v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Pending
3337 Const. P. 373/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3338 Const. P. 494/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Nosheela Rani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3339 Const. P. 647/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Masood Aslam Jat (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3340 Const. P. 681/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Rais Qambar Ali Khan Leghari (Petitioner) VS Munawar Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
3341 Const. P. 636/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Younis (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3342 Const. P. 305/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Maqbool Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3343 Const. P. 516/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Bhori & another (Petitioner) VS SSP Mirpurkhas & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3344 Const. P. 516/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Kausar & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3345 Const. P. 62/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Akber & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3346 Const. P. 62/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Akber & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3347 Const. P. 809/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Allahditta (Petitioner) VS Mst. Mariyam & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.302-K/2023 Umair Afzal v. Muhammad Murad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3348 Criminal Appeal 44/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 GHULAM RASOOL (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3349 Const. P. 640/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3350 Const. P. 7068/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.525-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3351 Const. P. 507/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Nadiya & antoher (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3352 Const. P. 673/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4272/2022 Abdul Aziz deceased through his LRs v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3353 Const. P. 1165/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Muhammad Akbar & Others (Petitioner) VS Riaz Hussain & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3354 Const. P. 132/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Taj Bibi (Petitioner) VS I. G Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3355 Const. P. 1825/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naseem us Sami and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3356 II.A. 55/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.135-K/2022 Fayyaz Ahmed & another v. Abdul Samad deceased through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3357 Const. P. 619/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Qaz Bano & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3358 II.A. 47/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Housing and Land Development (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Noor Muhammad Qureshi thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1314-K/2022 M/s. Housing and Land Development Pvt. Ltd. v. Noor Muhammad Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3359 II.A. 48/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 M/S Housing and Land Development (Pvt) Ltd. (Appellant) VS Noor Muhammad Qureshi thr: L.Rs & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1315-K/2022 M/s. Housing and Land Development Pvt. Ltd. v. Noor Muhammad Qureshi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3360 Const. P. 778/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Parha Shah & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3361 Const. P. 1558/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 M/S Super Coal Mines Lakhra (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3362 R.A (Civil Revision) 215/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Munawar Ali Shah. (Applicant) VS DFO, Sanghar @ Khipro & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3363 2023 SBLR Sindh 633 Const. P. 3236/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mehrun Nisa Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3364 Const. P. 431/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Sahibazadi & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3365 Const. P. 489/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Soonh and another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3366 Const. P. 137/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muhammad Usman Aheer (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
3367 Const. P. 568/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Nimra & another (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Saleem & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3368 R.A (Civil Revision) 195/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Muhammad Ishaque (Applicant) VS Photo and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1705-K/2021 Ishaque & others v. Photo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3369 R.A (Civil Revision) 40/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Mir Muhammad and Others (Applicant) VS Abdul Qadir and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3370 Const. P. 2949/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Wamiq Abrar Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3371 Const. P. 466/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Shahida (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3372 Const. P. 1607/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani (Petitioner) VS President N.B.P & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-MAY-22 Yes The legal position of the case is that dispensing with the regular inquiry and awarding two punishments i.e. downgrading and major penalty of dismissal from service, ought not to have been imposed upon the Petitioner at the same time when the charges were denied by the Petitioner. The principle of natural justice demands that the petitioner ought to have been heard on the allegations leveled against him; however, the respondent had chosen not to conduct the regular inquiry and simply relied upon the purported admission of the petitioner which was not called for in the above circumstances. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1926/2022 The President, National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi and others v. Sardar Imdad Hussain Gorchani Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3373 Const. P. 200/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Soonh & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3374 Const. P. 656/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Afsena & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3375 Criminal Miscelleneous 651/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Faheem Haider (Applicant) VS S.P Complaint Cell SBA and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3376 Const. P. 916/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Sakeena (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3377 Const. P. 118/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Jannat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3378 Const. P. 517/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Savera & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3379 Const. P. 265/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3380 Const. P. 440/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Nasim Zahra & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3381 Const. P. 1835/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-AUG-22 No Encroachment in Katchi Abadis Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3382 Const. P. 579/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Aneela & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3383 Const. P. 774/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Saeed Mian Qadri (Petitioner) VS Nadir Khan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3384 Const. P. 567/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3385 Const. P. 1879/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dr Arshad Ali Lodhi (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1417-K/2022 Dr. Khalid Iqbal Talpur v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3386 Const. P. 366/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-23 Yes Be that as it may, it is admitted position that the petitioner is not enrolled as an advocate under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, and/ or a practicing lawyer and has no standing at the bar at all. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3387 R.A (Civil Revision) 64/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Sattar Kashmiri (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3388 Const. P. 666/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Madad Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Imtiaz Ali Buriro & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author) C.P.490-K/2023 Syed Hussam v. Mst. Sehrish Mujtaba & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3389 Const. P. 228/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zahid Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Dadu & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3390 Const. P. 671/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 z.A Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3391 Cr.Bail 231/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Crl. Bail Appln. No.S-237 of 2022 2022 Manthar Ali Sario @ Mumtaz Ali @ Mirchoo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3392 Const. P. 724/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Niaz Ali Buriro & others (Petitioner) VS DRO & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
3393 Const. P. 593/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) VS Lal Jan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3394 R.A (Civil Revision) 70/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Karam & Others (Applicant) VS Mano & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3395 R.A (Civil Revision) 113/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yaseen (Applicant) VS Folad Khan (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3396 Const. P. 681/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Jahangir & another (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3397 Const. P. 3209/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3398 Cr.Bail 47/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ramesh Kumar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3399 Const. P. 673/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Niaz Ali Buriro (Petitioner) VS Amjad Hussain & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
3400 Const. P. 663/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mansoor Ali Buriro (Petitioner) VS Amjad Hussain Balhro & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
3401 Const. P. 1649/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Asim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3402 Const. P. 4499/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Adil Khan & Ors (Vide Order dt: 01.01.2021) (Petitioner) VS NBP and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3403 Const. P. 617/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sajjad Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes It is well-settled law that the Courts and Tribunals are constituted to decide the matters between the parties within the confines of statutory limitations and undue emphasis on technicalities or enlarging their scope would cramp their powers, diminish their effectiveness and defeat the very purpose for which they are constituted. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
3404 Const. P. 118/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 kaloo Khan Laghari (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3405 II.A. 19/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Amin Hasham & Others (Appellant) VS Muhammad Nadeem & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3406 Const. P. 310/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nizamuddin Mansoori (Petitioner) VS Abdul Latif & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.16-K/2023 Nizamuddin Mansoori thr.L.Rs. v. Abdul Lateef Rajput & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3407 Const. P. 542/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Bekho Mal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3408 Const. P. 6311/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sheikh Nusrat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3409 Const. P. 588/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Kamla & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Free Will Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3410 Const. P. 796/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3411 Cr.Bail 517/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SALEEM BUTT S/O AHMED DIN BUTT (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3412 Const. P. 1993/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Abdul Majeed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3413 Const. P. 2109/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Mehran Nirsa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3414 Const. P. 2217/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Nusrat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3415 Const. P. 2389/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Rasul Flour Mills Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3416 Const. P. 3844/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pir Ghulam Akbar Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3417 Const. P. 528/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Naeem (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3418 Const. P. 6119/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3163/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another,C.P.L.A.3219/2023 Makhdoom Shakil uz Zaman v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
3419 Const. P. 7385/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Faheem Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3420 Const. P. 1025/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Akram Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3421 Const. P. 5779/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nizamuddin Larik & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3422 Criminal Miscelleneous 221/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 WALI MUHAMMAD & OTHERS (Applicant) VS SP COMPLAINT CELL JAMSHORO & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3423 Const. P. 95/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Asad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3424 Cr.Acq.A. 40/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Saddaruddin (Appellant) VS Peeral and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3425 Criminal Miscelleneous 608/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 ALLAH BUX (Applicant) VS D.J S.B.A & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3426 Criminal Miscelleneous 569/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 MST.MEHRUNSA (Applicant) VS SESSIONS JUDGE /EX OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE TANDO (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3427 Cr.Bail 1647/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD NAQASH S/O MUHAMMAD ZAHID (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3428 Cr.Bail 1848/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SANA SAEED WD/O LATE SAEED MAZHAR ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3429 Const. P. 1005/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Fazal Akbar Khatri S/o Ali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Mst. Roshan Ara and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3430 Election Appeal 13/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Arsalan Khalid S/o Khalid Yaseen (Appellant) VS Election Commissioner of Pakistan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3431 Cr.J.A 114/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Appeal S.120/2022 2022 HAKIM ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3432 Criminal Miscelleneous 297/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 MST. MOAZZAMA SARFRAZ & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3433 Cr.Rev 155/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 AFTAB AHMED ANSARI S/O ABDUL WAHEED (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD SHAHID & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3434 Cr.Bail 1939/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AIJAZ KHAN S/O AWAL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3435 Cr.Bail 2768/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 DUR MUHAMMAD S/O YAR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3436 Cr.Bail 997/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD MOHSIN S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3437 Criminal Miscelleneous 857/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ALI AHMED TARIQ S/O AHMED ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3438 Cr.Bail 2441/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3439 Criminal Miscelleneous 460/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL RAUF S/O MUHAMMAD KALEEM (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD KHALID & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3440 Cr.Acq.A. 451/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASADULLAH KHAN S/O ALLAHYAR KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATEE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3441 Cr.J.A 96/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MEHRAB KHAN @ BABAR S/O FAYYAZ HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3442 Election Appeal 116/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Deedar Ali S/o Sheral Abro (Appellant) VS The RO PS-98 Khi East and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3443 Cr.Bail 1090/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BABUL ALI S/O IQBAL & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3444 Cr.Rev 228/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ZAKI S/O MUHAMMAD AFZAL (Applicant) VS LEARNED SPL JUDGE ANTI CORRUPTION KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3445 Criminal Miscelleneous 774/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. FATIMA W/O QUDOOS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3446 Cr.Bail 541/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD RIZWAN @ RUSTAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3447 Cr.Bail 2623/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RIAZ AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3448 Const. P. 3139/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Farooq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3711/2022 Abdul Haseeb v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretry, Karachi and others,C.P.L.A.1014-K/2023 Farooq Hussain v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Disposed Dismissed
3449 Const. P. 3664/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Zafar Khan Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3450 Election Appeal 196/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nawab Ali Brohi S/o Ghulam Ali Brohi (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner and others. (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3451 Cr.Bail 325/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SIRAJ S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3452 Const. P. 5469/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3453 Cr.Bail 1762/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RAO TANVEER AHMED S/O SHABBIR AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3454 Cr.Bail 1701/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAIKH MUHAMMAD KALAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.135-K/2023 Shaikh Muhammad Kalam v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
3455 Cr.Bail 526/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 FAHIM S/O RIAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3456 Const. P. 1600/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Afzal Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3457 Cr.Bail 1821/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL REHMAN S/O AKBAR KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3458 Const. P. 1144/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P Nos. D- 1450 of 2001, C.P No. D-531 of 2005 and C.P No. D- 637 of 2009 2002 Baqai Medical University (Petitioner) VS Employes Old Age Benefits Institution (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3459 Cr.Bail 2810/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HAJI YAQOOB S/O HAJI QASIM & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3460 Cr.Bail 702/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 GHULAM MURTAZA S/O MUHAMMAD ASLAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3461 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 644/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P No. D-3061 of 2022 2020 C.O.C, MCC Hyderabad (Applicant) VS Abdul Khan (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3462 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 70/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 71 to 108 of 2013 2013 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Care Impex (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3463 Const. P. 877/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Darwais Hameed (Petitioner) VS M/s South Asia Pakistan Terminal Pvt Ltd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-24 Yes It is well settled that certiorari is available to quash a decision for an error of law. It will also be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction when an inferior Court or a tribunal acts without jurisdiction or over its jurisdiction or fails to exercise its jurisdiction or where the Court or a tribunal acts illegally in the exercise of its undoubted jurisdiction and it decides a matter in violation of the principle of natural justice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3464 Cr.Bail 1422/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 OWAIS S/O ABDULLAH KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3465 Const. P. 3764/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-APR-24 Yes Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3466 Const. P. 1091/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Salma Bano W/o Sikander Ali (Petitioner) VS Shahzad and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3467 Cr.Tran 15/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHEER AHMED S/O MUNIR AHMED (Appellant) VS MEHDI ALI KAZMI & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3468 Cr.Rev 217/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 TAJ MUHAMMAD S/O NOOR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS SHO SHAH LATIF TOWN & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3469 Cr.Rev 133/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 YAAR MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE IIND ADJ THATTA & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3470 Criminal Miscelleneous 742/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 TALHA YOUSUF S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF (Applicant) VS SSP COMPLAINT CELL KHI SOUTH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3471 Cr.Bail 1730/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 IMRAN @ RAJU S/O SHAHZAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3472 Election Appeal 95/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Hasnain Ali Chohan S/o Mumtaz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3473 Election Appeal 153/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Ali Khan S/o Abdullah Khan (Appellant) VS Election Commssioner of Pakistan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3474 R.A (Civil Revision) 139/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Agha Abid Majeed Khan Thr. Ghous Bakhsh Sahqani (Applicant) VS Idrees Ahmed and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3475 Election Appeal 206/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Manzar ul Haq Thanvi S/o Intizar ul Haq THanvi (Appellant) VS The RO PS-101 Khi East V and ANother (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3476 Cr.Bail 1088/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 FARRUKH NASEEM S/O MUHAMMAD NASEEM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.157-K/2023 Farrukh Naseem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3477 Criminal Miscelleneous 257/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 GULZAR AHMED S/O JAN MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3478 Election Appeal 123/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Rashid Nawaz S/o M. Afzal Khan (Appellant) VS The RO PS-86 Khi Malir and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3479 Election Appeal 157/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Rehan Qaiser S/o Qaiser Ahmed Shaikh (Appellant) VS The RO NA-237 Khi East-II and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3480 Election Appeal 226/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Laraib Waqar S/o Shaikh Waqar Ahmed (Appellant) VS The RO PS-128 KhI Central-VII and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3481 Election Appeal 255/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Anwar Ali S/o Mir Hazar Khan (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3482 Cr.Bail 851/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 GHULAM RASOOL @ RASOOLI S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STASE (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3483 Cr.Bail 706/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD MEHBOOB S/O HABIB AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3484 Cr.Bail 1456/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 UMER S/O SHAHID (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3485 Cr.Bail 1498/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 DANISH ALI S/O AMJAD ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3486 Cr.Bail 1419/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 FARHAN YASEEN S/O M. AFZALUL QADEER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3487 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 21/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Ghulam Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3488 Cr.Bail 1686/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SAJJAD ALI S/O SHER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE SATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3489 Cr.Bail 1400/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 GUL BAHAR SHAH S/O BACHAL SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.140-K/2023 The State v. Gul Bahar Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan In Transit
3490 Criminal Miscelleneous 790/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MISS WAJIHA AMAN (ADVOCATE) (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3491 Criminal Miscelleneous 319/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MEHMOOD BAQI MOULVI (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3492 Cr.Bail 1489/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SALEH SHAH S/O GHULAM NABI & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3493 Cr.Bail 1587/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAHZAIB S/O ABDUL KHALIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3494 Cr.Bail 1709/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL REHMAN S/O SALAMAT RANA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3495 Cr.Tran 54/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ISMAIL S/O BAHRAM KHAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3496 Const. P. 1115/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Darakhshan D/o Muhammad Tahir (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3497 Cr.Rev 171/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 FAISAL KHAN S/O ABDUL MUGHIB KHAN & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS MST. SABRA & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3498 Criminal Miscelleneous 427/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Umar Kunbhar (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-24 Yes This Court vide order dated 28-09-2024 disposed of the instant application with a direction to DIG Mirpurkhas to conduct the inquiry to ascertain the factual position of the case by hearing the parties; however, no compliance report was submitted and again another order dated 02-10-2024 was passed with direction to DIGP Mirpurkhas to submit a compliance report. Today, DIGP Mirpurkhas has submitted a compliance report. At this stage, both the parties agreed to the disposal of the contempt application in the term that SHO shall take a personal bond from the private respondents in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (PKR. one million) from each respondent to the effect that no harassment shall be caused to the applicant. If they fail to furnish the bond for the aforesaid purpose, DIGP shall take immediate action in terms of paragraph 05 of the compliance report. 3. This contempt/listed application is disposed of in the above terms. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3499 Const. P. 708/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Seengar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3500 Const. P. 821/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3501 Const. P. 977/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Syed Abbas Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3502 Const. P. 2072/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Abdul Ghafoor Jagirani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3503 Cr.Bail 259/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Allah Dino Shaikh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3504 Const. P. 658/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Zaheer Abbas Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3505 Const. P. 1485/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ali Gul (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-24 Yes Section 491 of the Cr.P.C. empowers the High Court to issue writs of habeas corpus, which are used to challenge the legality of a person's detention. It provides a remedy for those who believe they are being unlawfully detained, whether by the government or private individuals. The primary purpose of Section 491 Cr.P.C is to ensure that the person is detained under due process of law. And the detention is not based on whim or caprice. Before parting with this order it is directed that the Police officials shall endeavor to contact with detenue and allows her to meet with her father/petitioner and ensure no harm is caused to her by either party and if any harassment is caused to her by any of the parties the police shall act swiftly. In view of the statement of the Investigating officer, no case of illegal detention is made out and the purpose of filing the instant petition under Article 199 read with section 491 Cr. P.C. has been served; therefore, the same stands disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3506 Const. P. 504/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Siddique Khaskheli & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3507 Const. P. 506/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Misri Khan Samo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3508 Const. P. 1056/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sht. Kousar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3509 Const. P. 1244/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Abdul Rauf Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3510 Const. P. 460/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sagheer Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3511 Criminal Miscelleneous 550/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Gulsher Chachar (Applicant) VS The State & (04) Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3512 Const. P. 911/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Musrat (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes The subject issue involves the intricacies of marriages of the parties, which is governed by the Christian Marriage Act 1872, The Divorce Act 1869, and the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance. The court underscored in [2003 YLR 400 Lahore-High-Court-Lahore] that Christian marriages in Pakistan are monogamous unions, setting them apart from Muslim marriages, which are seen as civil contracts. The Christian Marriage Act stringently prohibits polygamy, making any second marriage conducted without dissolving the first one void and punishable. At the same time, the legal validity of a marriage is largely determined by the religious backgrounds of the individuals involved, as is the second marriage of Mst. Sughran after converting to Islam. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3513 Const. P. 1246/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Dolat & others (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 Yes The petitioner was appointed on a contract basis, and his satisfactory performance has not been disputed by the respondent. The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 was enacted to regularize the services of certain categories of employees appointed on adhoc and contract basis in Sindh. The Act defines "employee" as a person appointed to a post on adhoc and contract basis, excluding daily wages and work-charge employees. Section 3 of the Act outlines the specific categories of employees eligible for regularization. The law states that contract and adhoc employees working in government departments and projects in the province before the 2013 Act became effective should be considered as regular employees. However, despite this clear provision, the service of the petitioner has not been regularized, which is apathy. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3514 Criminal Miscelleneous 454/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Aziz (Applicant) VS SSP Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3515 Const. P. 5370/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Abid Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-24 Yes The Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Khalid v. National Accountability Bureau (2017 SCMR 1340) has provided certain guidelines which need to be adhered to by the F.I.A. while probing the cases against the Housing Societies. 6. This Court, while exercising discretionary power under Article 199, of the Constitution is not an appellate court. Especially when alternative remedies exist under specific statutes and rules, and when the Court???s discretionary powers remain unaffected. However, in the present case question is whether F.I.A. has jurisdiction in Provincial employee cases in terms of the ratio of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of F.I.A. Vs Syed Hamid Ali Shah Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3516 Const. P. 343/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Shahnawaz Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3517 Cr.Bail 445/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Baqir Manghanhar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-24 Yes It is a settled principle of law that the bail plea is to be decided based on material available on record tentatively and the deeper appreciation of evidence is not permissible under the law. However, the allegations against the applicant are serious and there could be no redemption or compensation for the victim because he would have to live with the worst scars that one could imagine. However, as per the version, during the investigation medical examination of the victim Ali Abbas was conducted but such a report is negative even though a DNA report is negative, therefore, when the exact language of the definition of the offense is placed in juxtaposition, a ground of further inquiry in terms of sub-clause 2 of section 497 Cr.P.C. is made out. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3518 R.A (Civil Revision) 181/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ghulam Hyder (Applicant) VS Chhagan & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No In principle, the provision of Order XVII, Rule 3 CPC, is penal and as per the settled law such provisions should be strictly construed and applied, therefore, once the case of delinquent litigant squarely falls within the purview and mischief of the law, then neither any concession should be shown to such litigant nor a lenient favoring him should be resorted to; this should not be permissible done on the touchstone of exercise of the discretionary power of the court and/or on the approach that technicalities of procedure should not be allowed to impede the interest of justice; and/or that litigants should not be knocked out on technical grounds and that adversarial lis should be settled on merits. If such an approach is liberally followed and resorted to there shall be no discipline in the adjudication of civil litigation and the delinquent whose case though is squarely hit and covered by penal provisions of Order XVII Rule 3 CPC would be given a chance to his advantage and the disadvantage of his opposite side. This is not the spirit of the law at all. It may not be out of place to mention here that to apply and to adhere to the law is not a mere technicality, rather it is a duty cast upon the court as per Article 4 of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 to do so. Thus, where the order XVII rule 3, CPC is duly attracted, the court has no option except to take action under it. It is settled law that where the last opportunity to produce evidence is granted and the party has been warned of the consequences, the court must enforce its order unfailingly and unscrupulously without exception. Such order in my opinion not only put the system back on track and reaffirm the majesty of the law, but also put a check on the trend of seeking multiple adjournments on frivolous grounds to prolong and delay proceedings without any valid or legitimate rhyme or reason. Similarly, where the court has passed an order granting the last opportunity, it has not only passed a judicial order but also made a promise to the lis that no further adjournments will be granted for any reason, and in such eventuality, the court must enforce its order and honor its promise. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3519 Cr.Bail 123/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Haque (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3520 Const. P. 1429/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mohsin Ahmed Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3521 Const. P. 1419/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Riaz Hussain Thebo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3522 Criminal Appeal 471/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 The State/ANF through Assistant Director (Law) (Appellant) VS Sheikh Kaiser Waheed & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-DEC-24 Yes Coming to the rule position of the case, Rule 22.16 of the Police Rules, 1934, outlines the procedures for handling case property, Police must seize relevant items and mark them with details of the case and the person from whom they were seized. Seized items must be stored securely until further legal action. Items connected with cases sent for trial or suspicious/unclaimed items ordered by a Magistrate must be submitted to headquarters or outposts. Detained material must be presented to a Magistrate for early disposal or release on security. The Police Rules require that case property be stored in the Malkhana and recorded in Register No. XIX. The police and prosecution are responsible for ensuring the safe custody of the property, including its secure transportation to laboratories for analysis. This procedure guarantees the integrity of the case property until it is presented in court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3523 Const. P. 104/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Sagar Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3524 Const. P. 1595/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ghulam Sarwar Zardari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3525 Const. P. 1592/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Nooruddin Baloch (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3526 Const. P. 518/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Tarique Hussain Kubar & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3527 Const. P. 544/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Rasool Rajper (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3528 Const. P. 299/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sajid Hussain Bhutto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3529 Const. P. 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Firdos Noor Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3530 Const. P. 1689/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Zeeshan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3531 Const. P. 1447/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Shafqat Ali Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3532 Const. P. 520/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khadim Hussain Channa & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3533 Cr.Bail 1050/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 QASIM ANWAR S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-24 Yes This Court ordinarily does not interfere with the progression of the trial to avoid discussion and remarks on the merits of the case as held in the case of Ehsan Akbar v. The State and 2 others (2007 SCMR 482). It has been long settled by the Supreme Court that when the trial is likely to commence or begin, bail application should not be decided on merits, and the matter be left to the trial Court because it may prejudice the case of either party. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Muhammad Sadik & others vs The State 1980 SCMR 203, Muhammad Ismail vs Muhammad Rafiq PLD 1989 SC 585, Mian Dad vs The State 1992 SCMR 1418, Gohar Rehman vs Muhammad Tahir 2011 SCMR 815. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3534 Const. P. 1545/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Manzoor Ahmed Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3535 Const. P. 1270/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Sohail Aziz Mughal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3536 Const. P. 815/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3537 Cr.Bail 340/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Ali Gadani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-24 Yes Additionally the case against the applicant, in the absence of any independent witness of the alleged incident, requires further inquiry as contemplated under sub-section (2) to Section 497, Cr.P.C. In the case of Muhammad Tanveer v. The State (PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3538 Const. P. 461/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Gul Hassan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3539 Const. P. 481/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Yar Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3540 Const. P. 507/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khan Muhammad Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3541 Const. P. 174/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Raheel Ali (Petitioner) VS POS & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3542 Criminal Appeal 185/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Pretam @ Vinod & another (Appellant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3543 Const. P. 937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Zain-ul-Abdin (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3544 Const. P. 980/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Jawed Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS Superintendent of police Ghotki & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JUL-24 No We, in the above circumstances of the case, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, that if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action will be taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, if any, pending before the competent Court of law; so far as the issues raised by the parties in this constitution petition, the same shall be taken care of by the competent forum under the law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3545 Const. P. 710/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No It is a settled principle of law that merely qualifying for the test/interview does not create any vested right for appointment to a specific post in favor of the candidate. In principle, an interview is inherently a subjective evaluation, and a Court of law does not have jurisdiction to substitute its opinion with that of the testing/selection Board to provide relief to anyone. The role of the testing/selection Board is to evaluate candidates based on a variety of subjective criteria, which may include interpersonal skills, presentation, and other intangible qualities that are difficult to measure objectively. These assessments are inherently qualitative and depend on the opinion of interviewers, who are appointed for their expertise and ability to make such evaluations. However, this does not mean that the decisions of the Selection Board are beyond scrutiny. If there were any indications of malafides, bias, or significant errors in opinion that are apparent from the record, the Court would certainly be compelled to intervene. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3546 Const. P. 430/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Rahib Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3547 Const. P. 552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mst Najma Khokhar & another (Petitioner) VS The District & Session Judge Ghotki & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3548 R.A (Civil Revision) 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst, Salma Parveen and Others (Applicant) VS Mohammad Aslam and Othrs (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3549 Const. P. 317/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Sadaf Naz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3550 Const. P. 1725/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Imran Ali Shah & Another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3551 Const. P. 325/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Kamil (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3552 Const. P. 1717/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Naseer Ahmed Muchi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3553 Const. P. 699/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ahsan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3554 Cr.Tran 54/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 ADNAN S/O MUHAMMAD ALI (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-24 Yes Primarily, Justice can be achieved only when the court deals in the presence of both parties and the court has the power to move cases from one court to another. But the rights of the parties cannot be curtailed, controlled, or interfered with subject to exceptions provided under the law. It is well-settled law that the transfer of a matter from one court to another could only be granted in exceptional circumstances, where it was shown that the same would be in the interest of justice. Reliance is placed upon the judgment in the case of All Pakistan Newspapers Society & Others vs. Federation of Pakistan & Others PLD 2012 Supreme Court 1. 5. Prima facie the ground raised by the learned counsel for the applicant is tenable based on the reason the trial court is lying vacant since long as such there is no progress in the trial of the applicant in that Court which amounts to keeping the accused behind the bar for indefinite period without trial; in such circumstances, he intends to seek a fair and speedy trial in the criminal case pending adjudication, which is only possible if he the trial court proceeds with the matter. However, in the best interest of justice, coupled with the instance taken by the learned special prosecutor, it would be appropriate for a speedy trial of the case. In such circumstances, judicial proprietary demand that Special Case No. 79 of 2022 arising out of FIR 26/2022 pending adjudication before the Court of CNS-II Clifton Karachi needs to be transferred to the Court of CNS-III for the smooth and speedy trial of the applicant. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3555 Const. P. 1265/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Sonia (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3556 Cr.Bail 157/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Asad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3557 Const. P. 455/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sarfraz Qureshi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3558 Const. P. 1191/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muhammad Ayob Gopang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3559 Const. P. 210/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ashique Ali (Petitioner) VS Manzoor Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes The courts below have consistently found against the applicants??? claims, and these decisions should not be overturned in a revision proceedings unless extraordinary circumstances exist. A revision court does not re-examine evidence like an appellate court. 8. Based on the foregoing, the findings of the courts below are not jurisdictionally flawed and do not show any misreading or non-reading of evidence that could have led to a miscarriage of justice. Therefore, the revision application is without merit and is dismissed. Each party will bear their costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3560 Const. P. 513/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shahryar Bhirajo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3561 Cr.Bail 321/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Kamran Ali Makwal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-24 Yes The Supreme Court in the recent case has held that the law of bail under Section 497 Cr. P.C, wherein it is provided that a person shall not be released on bail if there appear to be reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment of 10 years, though all the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497 Cr. P.C, however in pre-arrest bail this Court is only required to see the ulterior motives and malafide of the complainant and police and will also tentatively assess the material and can also touch the merits of the case so far as the allegations contained in the F.I.R, and statement of PWs and other material points available on the police file. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3562 Const. P. 561/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Iqbal Gopang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3563 Const. P. 1598/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Riaz Hussain Panhyar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3564 Const. P. 613/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Maqsood Ahmed Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3565 Const. P. 529/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Abid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-24 Yes The registration of an FIR does not guarantee conviction. If the investigation reveals insufficient evidence, the accused may be released on bail. The police officer is empowered to take cognizance of an offense and try the accused or send them for trial. After completing the investigation, the officer must submit a police report to a Magistrate. The report should include details of the parties, the nature of the information, and the names of witnesses. The report should also indicate whether the accused was arrested or released on bail. The police report can be classified as "A," "B," or "C." An "A" report indicates that the FIR is true but the accused is untraced or there is no evidence to justify trial. A "B" report indicates that the FIR is false or frivolous and no case is made out. A "C" report indicates that the criminal case was filed due to a mistake of fact or is of a civil nature. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3566 Criminal Miscelleneous 358/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Arbab Ibrahim Rahimoon (Applicant) VS SSP Umerkot & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel states that the applicant may be permitted to file a private complaint in terms of section 200 Cr.P.C before the learned Magistrate concerned so far as the allegation of the applicant is concerned, which shall be dealt with by learned Magistrate after recording his statement on oath. If this is the position of the case, let the Magistrate concerned entertain the private complaint of the applicant and the same shall be decided within reasonable time in accordance with law. 6. In view of the above, instant Criminal Miscellaneous application stands disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3567 Const. P. 437/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Riaz Bhanbhro & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3568 Const. P. 556/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mian Assadullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3569 Cr.Bail 1377/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 IMTIAZ S/O MEHBOOB ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes Keeping in view the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the applicants have been involved in the cases by throwing a wider net by the Police under the garb of the pretext that the applicants are professional car snatchers. Mere allegations are no grounds to decline bail for an accused. It is now established that while granting post and pre-arrest bail, the merits of the case can be touched upon by the Court. Reliance is placed on Miran Bux Vs. The State (PLD 1989 SC 347), Sajid Hussain @ Joji Vs. The State (PLD 2021 SC 898), Javed Iqbal Vs. The State (PLD 2022 SCMR 1424) & Muhammad Ijaz Vs. The State (2022 SCMR 1271). Even otherwise the offense does not attract the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. Thus the case calls for further probe, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Tanveer v. The State and another (PLD 2017 SC 733), the case against the applicants requires further inquiry within the meaning of sub-section 2 to Section 497 Cr.P.C. Consequently, these bail applications are allowed and the applicants are allowed post-arrest bail in F.I.R No.182 and 183 of 2024, registered under Section 381-A PPC at Police Station Joharabad, Karachi, subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.200,000 (Rupees two hundred thousand only) each in both cases and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3570 Const. P. 826/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Fatah Solangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3571 Const. P. 916/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Khadija Nazeer Dayo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3572 Cr.Rev 38/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Muzaffar Ali Soomro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3573 Const. P. 445/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Irshad Ali Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
3574 Service Appeal 7/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Asif Ali Bhatti (Appellant) VS Hon (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3575 Criminal Miscelleneous 387/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Ghani (Applicant) VS Abdul Wahid @ Wahidu & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3576 Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Waheed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-24 Yes The petition regarding the upgraded post and pay fixation are not entertainable for the reasons that such matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient as such this petition is dismissed, which involves disputed claims and counterclaims on the subject post, therefore this court is not in a position to dilate upon such disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3577 Const. P. 622/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Syed Mureed Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3578 Cr.Bail 1026/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 NAQEEBULLAH S/O GUL RAIZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-24 Yes 7. The prosecution has applied in FIR Section 397 PPC. Whereas Section 393 PPC pertains to an attempt to commit robbery which is punishable with RI for a term that shall be extended up to seven years, whereas Section 397 PPC provides the punishment for an attempt to commit robbery or dacoity when armed with deadly weapons for which the accused shall be punished not less than seven years, however, the prosecution was only bothered to invoke Section 397 PPC without corresponding offense. It is well settled that while examining the question of bail, the Court has to consider the minimum aspect of the sentence provided for the alleged offense. It is also the case of the prosecution that the applicant was not arrested on the spot but somewhere else after a couple of months and after his arrest on 4.4.2024, holding of test identification parade was necessary in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Farman Ali v. The State [1997 SCMR 971], which factum is missing in the present case, the reasons best known to the investigation officer, who allegedly narrated that applicant disclosed his identity when he was interrogated at the time of snap checking, if this is the stance of the investigating officer let this aspect be taken care of by the trial Court after examining him. Admittedly, the name of the Applicant is not mentioned in the F.I.R. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3579 Criminal Miscelleneous 671/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SALMAN SHAH S/O HAROON SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-24 Yes The statutory duty casts upon the officer of a police station to enter information regarding the cognizable offense first and then the investigation comes later to gather evidence and other relevant material to prosecute the identified culprits. No doubt, an Investigating Officer plays a crucial role in the administration of the criminal justice system and the constituent of the investigation report and its worth keeps hold of plenteous value and repercussions on the outcome of any criminal case, but tainted investigations can become an acute obstacle in the administration of justice. In the case of Sughra Bibi vs. State [PLD 2018 SC 595], it was held that during the investigation, the Investigating Officer is obliged to investigate the matter from all possible angles while keeping in view all the versions of the incident brought to his notice and as required by Rule 25.2(3) of the Police Rules, 1934. An Investigating Officer has to find out the truth of the matter under investigation. His object shall be to discover the facts of the case and to arrest the real offender or offenders. He shall not commit himself prematurely to any view of the facts for or against any person. Whereas in the case of Babubhai v. State of Gujrat and others [(2010) 12 SCC 254], the Supreme Court of India held that investigation must be fair, transparent, and judicious as it is the minimum requirement of the rule of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3580 Const. P. 526/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Mustafa & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3581 Cr.Bail 923/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Bilal Ghori (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3582 Cr.Bail 161/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Khalique Gabol & Another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3583 Const. P. 802/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes Admittedly, these are the cases of harassment at the hands of police in connivance with private respondents. The meaning of the word "harass" has been explained as "Injure and injury???; these words have numerous and comprehensive popular meanings, as well as having a legal import. A line may be drawn between these words and the word "harass" excluding the latter from being comprehended within the word "injure" or "injury". The synonyms of "harass" are: Weary, tire, perplex, distress tease, vex, molest, trouble, and disturb. They all have relation to mental annoyance." In the Oxford Dictionary of New Words, the meaning of the word "harassment" has been explained, which reads as "The subjection of a person to aggressive pressure or intimidation. ???Harassment" should be interpreted as potentially producing some unreasonably adverse impact on the victim. The conduct should produce more than "worry", "trouble", "discomfort" or "unease" unless perhaps these are experienced to an extreme degree." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3584 Const. P. 584/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Rafique Chijjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3585 Criminal Miscelleneous 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Dedar Ali Khoso (Appellant) VS The State and others (Opponent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3586 Const. P. 218/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Manzoor Ahmed Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3587 Const. P. 827/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes The right to life, as guaranteed by Article 9 of the Constitution, extends to the right to livelihood. This means that the petitioner has the right to earn a living. However, a respondent department can terminate the services of the petitioner if he fails in all respects, but only if it is done under the law, and the termination of service if any must follow established legal procedures and cannot be arbitrary or unfair. We are also equally conscious of the legal position that illegally gotten things cannot operate as a bar nor lapse of time could be made a reason to declare an ???illegality??? as ???legality??? but a suspicion alone shall not be sufficient to escape the requirement of ???due process??? because it is not whims or fancy of an executive functionary to deprive one of his right due process alone. Therefore, the respondents were/are not legally justified to withhold the posting order/joining letter of petitioner except after due process particularly when the respondents do not dispute or deny his appointment letter. A departure from ???due process??? resulting in taking away or infringing a fundamental right will be sufficient to entertain such a petition. Reference may be made to the case of Pir Imran Sajid & Ors v. MD /GM & Ors 2015 SCMR 1257. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3588 Const. P. 858/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Zahid Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes If this is a position of case and keeping in view the order dated 12-01-2023 passed by this Court, this matter needs to be transmitted to the Chief Secretary Sindh, who in co-ordination with Secretary Education and Literacy Department, is directed to look into the matter of the petitioners at his end, if the grievances of the petitioners are found to be genuine, the same shall be redressed under policy and law within three weeks, after hearing the parties concerned. However, the Chief Secretary shall also look into the factual position of the case and if he finds any candidate obtained lesser marks than the petitioners and subsequently appointed, then appropriate directions shall be issued to the competent authority for the relief so claimed, which shall be in line with Articles 25 and 27 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3589 Cr.Bail 784/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD TAUQEER S/O NAZIM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-OCT-24 Yes It is by now well settled that an accused can maintain a subsequent bail application, at the post-arrest stage, only on the strength of fresh ground, accrued after dismissal of his first plea. In the case reported by The State through Advocate General N.W.F.P. vs. Zubair Ahmed and others (PLD 1986 SC 173) the Supreme Court has held that second or the subsequent bail application to the same Court shall lie only on a fresh ground, which did not exist at the time when the first bail application was made, however in the present case learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out fresh grounds which were not available to the applicant at the time of filing of his first bail application. He nevertheless emphasized that directions given by this Court while disposing of the bail application of the applicant have not been complied with, as such, the applicant is entitled to bail on this ground alone. I am unable to subscribe to such submission of the learned counsel for the applicant. Non-compliance with the directions issued to the trial Court to examine witnesses within some specified time cannot be fatal in terms of the ratio of the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Nisar Ahmed vs. The State and others (PLD 2016 SC 11). However, in the present case, the applicant has shown multiple fresh grounds for consideration of his request for grant of the bail bail application. The case against the applicant prima facie is based on two versions due to the complainant's negation of the story put forward by the police and the affidavit of no objection beside the PW Abdul Ghaffar has narrated a different story including the statement of PC Warid Ali and SIP Muzzafar Ali. The accused's previous bail was denied, but new evidence now warrants reconsideration of his bail plea. Therefore, under such circumstances, this court has left with no option but to release the applicant on post-arrest bail in the subject crime the trial court is still in chaos and the reasons assigned are not sufficient to keep the applicant behind the bar for an indefinite period for the simple reason that the Supreme Court has ruled that delays in trials violate the constitutional rights of the accused to liberty, fair trial, and dignity. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3590 Cr.Bail 187/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Nehal (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3591 Const. P. 493/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Gulzar Ahmed Mahesar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3592 Const. P. 1518/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Majida Parveen solangi through Attorney (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3593 Const. P. 788/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Tahir Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3594 Const. P. 3257/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.59-K/2011 Hafiz Muhammad Tariq v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed
3595 Const. P. 792/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Party-1 (Appellant) VS Party-2 (Appellant) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 Yes contract employees Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3596 Const. P. 6640/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: Nil 2014 Rehan Hussain Ghouri and ors (Petitioner) VS S.B.C.A and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.720-K/2017 Muhammad Zubair and others v. Sindh Building Control Authority thr. D.G. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3597 Const. P. 7004/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3598 Const. P. 415/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Benish Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-OCT-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3599 2022 SBLR Sindh 1794, 2018 PLC (CS) Note 123 Const. P. 954/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Rehana Parveen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.354-K/2017 Ms. Rehana Parveen v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3600 Const. P. 1847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3601 2020 PLC (CS) 360 Const. P. 5839/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Arshad Noor Khan (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3602 Const. P. 411/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Akhtar Hussain (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3603 Const. P. 2949/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdullah Mushtaq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.830-K/2018 Karachi Metropolitan Corporation v. Abdullah Mushtaq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3604 Const. P. 802/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Noman (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3605 2019 PLC (CS) 1084 Const. P. 253/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Faraz Sherwani and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.70-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Asif and another,C.A.1000/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others,C.P.2215/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarter, Islamabad v. Faraz Sherwani and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be heard a/w C.A.816/2020 out of C.P.1771/20 after 3 months.
3606 2017 SBLR Sindh 1046 Const. P. 608/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Aijaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Director Bank Controller State Bank of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3607 Const. P. 2357/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Adial Shah & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-17 No An appointment / job cannot be given in lieu of a piece of land which amounts to sale of job, thus, is against the public policy. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3608 2019 SBLR Sindh 1817 Const. P. 4268/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Rabbani (Petitioner) VS Governor, State Bank of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3609 Const. P. 4330/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Muhammad Ali Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.905-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Ali Raza v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
3610 Const. P. 2896/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sohail & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3611 Const. P. 502/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pirah Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3612 2018 PLC CS 398 Const. P. 411/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dr. Amir Bux and others (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1772/2017 Dr. Amir Bux and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3613 Const. P. 499/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-FEB-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3614 Const. P. 5068/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Saleem & another (Petitioner) VS NAB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3615 Const. P. 390/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Shakoor Keerio (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3616 Const. P. 3652/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Waleed Saad (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-19 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3617 Const. P. 2413/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shaheena Nasreen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3618 Const. P. 160/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Hussain Tariq (Petitioner) VS P.O.Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3619 Const. P. 3012/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mangal (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3620 Cr.Rev 138/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Abdul Sattar (Applicant) VS Muhammad Azeem (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3621 Const. P. 3169/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Fouzia Khan (Petitioner) VS Chairman / CEO PIA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3622 Const. P. 6792/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mamoon Moazam Khuhawar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.100/2018 Federal Board of Revenue, through the Chairman/Secretary Revenue Division FBR, Islambad v. Mamoon Moazam Khuhawar and others,C.P.L.A.515/2022 Mamoon Moazam Khuhawar and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3623 Const. P. 4605/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Amanullah Tamimy (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.410-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Amanullah Tamimy and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3624 Const. P. 2833/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Muhammad Waseem and 4 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3625 Cr.Bail 7/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haroon alias Shaman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3626 Const. P. 1380/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst.Munawara Khatoon and (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3627 Const. P. 5250/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ziauddin Sabir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3628 Const. P. 2805/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aftab Ahmed Sariyo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3629 Const. P. 4260/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Irshad Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3630 I. A 10/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Muhammad Younis & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3631 Const. P. 321/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faiz Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh through Secretary Local Government Department Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3632 Const. P. 973/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ayaz Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3633 Const. P. 2219/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 HESCO (Petitioner) VS Secretary Energy Dept, and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3634 Const. P. 3929/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Naeem (Petitioner) VS General Tyre & Rubber Company of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3635 Const. P. 100/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Nafees Fatima (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.357-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. and another v. Nafees Fatima and others,C.P.L.A.365-K/2019 Pakistan Telecommunication Employees Trust and another v. Nafees Fatima and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
3636 Const. P. 101/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Hasnain Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.426-K/2019 Syed Hasnain Raza v. Federation of Pakistan thr. its Secy: I.T & Telecom M/o Information Technology and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3637 Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Raja Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.293-K/2019 Raja Mushtaq Ahmed v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deptt:Govt. of Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3638 Const. P. 6605/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zeeshan Karimi (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB) (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3639 Const. P. 151/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Miss Nabila Zafar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.122-K/2017 M/s Hadeed Welfare Trust thr. CEO Bin Qasim, Karachi and another v. Nabiha Zafar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3640 Const. P. 754/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst:Rehmat Shoro & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3641 Const. P. 3354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) VS Akhtar Hussain Chairman (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3642 Const. P. 3330/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3643 Const. P. 2083/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Farhana Mansoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3644 Const. P. 7211/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3645 Const. P. 3709/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Zahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3646 Cr.Acq.A. 8/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Nabi (Appellant) VS MST.BAGHAL & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3647 Const. P. 1154/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Youth Action for Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2221/2019 Youth Action for Pakistan thr. Ghulam Murtaza Sheikh, Jamshoro v. Province of Sindh thr. the Secretary, Relief Department, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3648 2018 PLC (CS) Note 64 Const. P. 4445/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Aftab Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1906/2017 Aftab Ali v. Federation of Pakistan, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3649 Const. P. 3279/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mushtaq Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3650 Cr.Bail 5/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MOHISIN ABBAS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3651 Const. P. 1091/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Zahoor Khan and 101 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.414-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Zahoor Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3652 Const. P. 7495/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ismail Hasan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3653 Const. P. 3582/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Shafi Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS The State (NAB and others) (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.152-K/2019 Shafi Muhammad Shah v. The State (NAB) through its Director General, National Accountability Bureau, Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3654 Const. P. 2773/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Rafique Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Regional Director & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes petitioner, filed an application under Section 3 & 4 of the Contempt of Court)for initiation of contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor on account of his willful, intentional and deliberate act of disobeying order passed by this Court . Mr. Rafique Ahmed Advocate, who is argued that despite clear directions the contemnors have not complied . respondent No. 4 has filed an application with a prayer to recall the order passed by this Court on the ground that she is owner of Plot and the petitioner who is her neighbor and is raising multistoried (3 storied) construction over his plot without approval of the competent authority i.e. Sindh Building Control Authority; that she has made several representations to the concerned authorities regarding the illegal construction put up by petitioner and has sent several reminders, drawing the attention of the SBCA, to the illegal constructions being put up in breach of the revised plan and the permission granted by the authorities, as well as the statutory provisions of the SBCA regulations-2018. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons all, we are not satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that substantial compliance of the order. Therefore, at this juncture, prima-facie, Petitioner has made out a case for initiating contempt proceedings against the alleged contemnor. Therefore, the office is directed to issue show cause notice under section 17 (1) of the Contempt of Court, why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them for willful defiance of the order dated order dated 26.06.2018passed by this Court. . Consequently the application CMANo.13080 of 2018 filed by the Respondent No.4 is dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3655 Cr.Bail 1085/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Chanessar Bheel (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3656 Const. P. 745/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Ghulam Hussain Iqbalani and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3657 Cr.Acq.A. 62/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Ghulam Rasool Thebo (Appellant) VS Ramz Ali & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3658 Const. P. 785/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Pakistan Telecome Mobile (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Idrees Hadi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3659 Const. P. 1282/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syeda Masooma Sughra Jafri (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3660 Const. P. 4492/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sibghatullah Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3661 Const. P. 6766/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Fazal-e-Rabbi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3662 Const. P. 4849/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Kausar Iqbal Malik (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.609/2019 Kausar Iqbal Malik v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Finance, M/o Finance, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3663 Const. P. 6825/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Akbar Ali Dero (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3664 Suit 1671/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rana Muhammad Nadeem. (Plaintiff) VS Muhammad rasheed Siddiqui. (ISSEUS) (Defendant) S.B. Order 24-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3665 Const. P. 608/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/S IFECO Pakistan (Pvt) ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appelant Tribunal Karachi &anohter (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.394-K/2017 M/s IFFCO Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Ghulam Muhammad Farooqi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3666 2018 PLC (CS) Note 179 Const. P. 5197/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mrs Sadia Ali Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3667 Const. P. 2010/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Refat Seema and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.23-K/2019 Mst: Rifat Seema v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3668 Const. P. 37/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Mithal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3669 2019 SBLR Sindh 418, 2019 PLC (CS) 1381 Const. P. 6251/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shaikh Muhammad Suleman (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3670 Const. P. 4224/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Shahid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3671 Const. P. 5141/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Gul Hassan Dahri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3672 Const. P. 6546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bheru Lal (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3673 Const. P. 284/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Roshan Ali Dero (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3674 Const. P. 5601/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Waheed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4590/2017,C.A.1597/2017,C.P.3667/2017,C.A.1611/2017,C.P.3659/2017,C.A.1602/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3675 Const. P. 1092/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Ramzan and ors (Petitioner) VS Evacuee Trust Property Board and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-18 No In the present proceedings, Petitioners have asked for declaration to the effect that the impugned order dated 31.01.2014 and 07.02.2014 as illegal and unlawful. Petitioners have also sought direction to the Respondents to pay arrears of salary of the Petitioners for the period of nine months w.e.f. 02.01.2010 to 30.09.2010 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3676 Const. P. 5836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faiz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.7-K/2018 Faiz Ali v. Province of Sindh and anothers Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3677 Const. P. 6440/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Kundal Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3678 2019 PLC (CS) 572 Const. P. 5798/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Anwery Begum (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3679 2018 PLC CS 510 H.C.A 108/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 P.T.C.L & another (Appellant) VS Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.313/2018 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others,C.A.416/2022 Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd, Karachi & another v. Anjuman Falah-e-Behboud, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3680 2019 PLC (CS) 817 Const. P. 5307/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mst. Nazima Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3681 Const. P. 42/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Zulfiqar Shah (Petitioner) VS State (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3682 Const. P. 2381/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s B.P Ind (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3683 2018 YLR Note 79 Cr.Bail 651/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 MUHAMMAD AMIN S/O SHAMIM AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3684 2019 PLC (CS) 1196 Const. P. 7908/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shankar Lal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-FEB-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3685 2019 PLC Lab. 182 Const. P. 5262/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M/s Inland Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mehdi Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3686 2019 PLC (CS) 1354 Const. P. 3238/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ghulam Ali Gopang (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3687 H.C.A 142/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority (Appellant) VS Malik Mohammad Asghar (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.504-K/2017 Advocate Malik Muhammad Asghar v. Pakistan Defence Officer Housing Authority Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3688 2019 PLC Lab. 233 Const. P. 6548/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Bibi Hajra (Petitioner) VS The Trustees of the Port of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1501-K/2021 The Trustees of Port of Karachi v. Bibi Hajra & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
3689 Const. P. 5261/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr Shakeel Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS S.P.S.C & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3690 Const. P. 3954/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.887-K/2018 Syed Ishitiaque Ahmed Hashmi v. Province of Sindh thr. its Director General and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3691 2019 PLC (CS) 1114 Const. P. 1610/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Ghulam Abbas Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3692 Const. P. 4622/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1456-K/2018 The Secy: M/o Port & Shipping Now M/o Maritime Affairs and another v. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3693 Const. P. 3716/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Dildar Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3694 2019 MLD 1295 H.C.A 425/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Asif Seemab Sindhu (Appellant) VS Administrator, DHA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
3695 Const. P. 3016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Fulcrum (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3696 Const. P. 3017/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Buksh Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3697 Const. P. 4422/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Irtaza Raza Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.68-K/2018 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.2976/2019 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited, Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Petroleum & Natural Resources Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
3698 Const. P. 3940/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Atlas Enterprises and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3699 Const. P. 461/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Mehboob Re-Rolling Mills (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3700 Const. P. 3569/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Pakistan Cables Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3079/2018 M/s. Pakistan Cables Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.85-K/2019 M/s. Pakistan Cables Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
3701 Const. P. 1463/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Iftikhar Hassan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4731/2018 The Director General Karachi Development Authority, Karachi and another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary Local Government, Karachi and another,C.P.1053-K/2018 The Director General Karachi Development Authority and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy. Local Govt. Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
3702 Const. P. 334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Saima Packaging (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3729/2018 Shaman Khan and others v. NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others,C.A.117/2019 Shaman Khan and others v. NAB thr. its Chairman, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of,Disposed
3703 Const. P. 903/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Hamsons Ind. (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3704 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAY-20 No Federal Government and PSM are directed to allocate requisite funds to settle the post-retirement claims of all such retired employees of PSM who have not approached the Court, and to deposit the same with the Nazir of this Court latest by 31.08.2020. At the request of learned DAG, PSM is directed to submit a complete list of claims of all such retired employees who have not approached the Court, within fifteen (15) days with advance copy to learned DAG. By consent, adjourned to 03.09.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3705 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3706 Const. P. 5192/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Pirzada Jamaluddin Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1115-K/2018 Prof: Dr. Pirzada Jamaluddin Ahmed Siddiqui v. The Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3707 Const. P. 8408/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nazir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.133-K/2019 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.71-K/2020 Nazir Ahmed Soomro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
3708 Cr.Bail 342/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Hamid Ali Shaikh (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3709 Const. P. 5470/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.443-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Muzaffae Jamil Mirza & others,C.P.376-K/2020 Muzaffar Jamil Mirza v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.1839/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Muzaffar Jamil Mirza and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
3710 Const. P. 2307/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-AUG-19 No commutation of pension Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3711 Const. P. 2580/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ms. Samina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3712 Const. P. 836/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Inayat (Petitioner) VS PO sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3713 Const. P. 1247/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Allah Bux (Petitioner) VS M.D (CEO) H.B.F.C Ltd & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.38-K/2020 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others,C.A.2-K/2021 Allah Bux v. Managing Director (CEO) House Building Finance Company Ltd and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Allowed
3714 Const. P. 2961/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahbaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3715 Const. P. 950/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Rasool & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3716 Const. P. 2031/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Achar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3717 Const. P. 2583/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3718 Const. P. 2780/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Anwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3719 Const. P. 2405/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Nasir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3720 Const. P. 1174/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 M/s. Nadeem Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS WAPDA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3721 Const. P. 2217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3722 Const. P. 1873/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mehnoon Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3723 Const. P. 2633/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3724 2020 PLC (CS) 417 Const. P. 673/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ahmed Ali Saharan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.591-K/2019 Ahmed Ali Saharan v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3725 Const. P. 1327/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Irfan Victor (Petitioner) VS Mst. Khalida (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3726 Const. P. 472/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zohaib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3727 Const. P. 664/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Allah Bachayo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3728 Const. P. 2342/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Naseeban (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3729 Const. P. 2320/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shah Muhammad and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3730 Const. P. 2179/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3731 Const. P. 3148/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3732 Const. P. 201/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Yasir Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3733 Const. P. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3734 Const. P. 2194/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zafar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3735 Const. P. 108/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Asghar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3736 Const. P. 1904/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sham Kumar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3737 Const. P. 1951/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mohammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3738 Const. P. 1771/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3739 Const. P. 2079/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sikandar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3740 Const. P. 2065/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3741 Const. P. 7524/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Arsalan Subeet (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.540-K/2019 Arsalan Subeet v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
3742 Const. P. 6342/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ashar Afaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3743 Const. P. 3688/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Saeed (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3744 R.A (Civil Revision) 219/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ayoob (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3745 Const. P. 3739/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS NAB & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3746 Const. P. 43/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Samuel Parvaiz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3747 Const. P. 897/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Haji Anwar Ali &another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3748 Const. P. 1943/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3749 Const. P. 2814/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Talib (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3750 Const. P. 3100/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3751 Const. P. 2347/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3752 Const. P. 6572/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sumair Saeed (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Aviation & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-SEP-19 Yes whether the transfer and posting of private Respondents is the domain of the Competent Authority of CAA, if they found the private Respondents to be worthy of posting at the particular post on acting/additional charge basis, in our view, this Court cannot interfere in the service affair of the Respondent-Authority until and unless it is shown that the said posting and transfer orders negate basic provision of law and Constitution, which is lacking in the present case Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3753 Const. P. 1929/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khuda Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3754 Const. P. 2326/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mir Abbas Raza Talpur (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3755 Const. P. 2526/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Waqas Tariq (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3756 Const. P. 1508/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Abdul Nasir Memon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3757 Const. P. 1397/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abrar Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3758 Const. P. 2558/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Arbab Ali &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3759 Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-SEP-19 Yes whether the private Respondents who are holding the present postings qualify to continue the office? Whether the Chief Minister, Sindh is/was competent under the Rule 5(4) (b) of the West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1964 to nominate person as Assistant Commissioner? Whether the Chief Minister is competent to grant exemption to the private respondents from qualifying in passing the Departmental Examination prescribed for the posts under reference for regularization and promotion of the private respondents? Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4105/2019,C.P.4144/2019,C.P.622-K/2019,C.P.4410/2019 SCP Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
3760 Const. P. 890/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shamshaduddin (Petitioner) VS Shahabuddin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3761 Const. P. 44/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Muhammad Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1027/2021 Hilal Care Private Ltd Karachi and others v. Sindh through Secretary Excise & Taxation Department Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks)
3762 Const. P. 339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3763 Const. P. 1659/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Miss Sanam & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.99-K/2020 Director (Legal) WAPDA v. Miss Sanam and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
3764 Const. P. 847/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3765 Const. P. 1368/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Rasool Bux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3766 Const. P. 1268/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Allah Warrayo (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3767 Const. P. 841/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Noor-ul-Nisa & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3768 Const. P. 2832/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3769 Const. P. 112/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Tariq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3770 2023 PLC Lab. Note 89 Const. P. 985/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3771 Civil Revision 14/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Mansoor Ali (Applicant) VS Executive District Officer (Health) (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3772 Civil Revision 149/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Ahmed & others (Applicant) VS Khamoon (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3773 Const. P. 3879/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghausia Jehangir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3774 Const. P. 4920/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maqsood Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-19 Yes regularization issue of employees of PSQCA Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3673/2020 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others,C.A.522/2021 Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Science and Technology, Islamabad & others v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Disposed Allowed and Remanded
3775 Const. P. 1803/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Sohail Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Chief Executive HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3776 Const. P. 1826/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Mst. Tamsila Ansari (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3777 Const. P. 2034/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3778 Const. P. 2339/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3779 Const. P. 990/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Mohiuddin (Petitioner) VS C.E.O. (NTDC) WAPDA and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3780 Const. P. 6814/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3781 Const. P. 1761/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Anwar Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3782 Const. P. 2588/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3783 Const. P. 1084/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Khuda Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3784 Const. P. 2334/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3785 I. A 13/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Lachman Das & others (Appellant) VS Tano Lal and Harji (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes The property in question being a public amenity cannot be encroached upon and as per the dicta laid down by the Honble Supreme Court, an area earmarked and reserved for an amenity like Massan/Graveyard and Aasaish, cannot be used for any other purposes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3786 Const. P. 4336/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Afshan Sahar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3787 Const. P. 3167/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Sad Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.407-K/2021 Syed Saad Ali & another v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3788 Const. P. 2645/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khalid Sahoowal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-20 Yes The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3789 Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-OCT-20 Yes Differently abled persons' plea for appointment in the quota reserved for such persons--We are of the view that the Chief Secretary Sindh, being the senior most officer in the Province, would be the most suitable person to oversee the entire process under his personal supervision in order to ensure not only the compliance of this Court's orders, but also to conclude the exercise in relation to those petitioners whose cases have not yet been considered and/or finalized--To ensure that appointment orders are received by all the 102 (81 + 21) petitioners, before the next date of hearing, who have been already recommended for appointment --To ensure that cases of all such petitioners in these petitions, that have not yet been considered and/or finalized, are considered on merits, strictly in accordance with law, and after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to them a speaking order is passed by the competent authority before the next date of hearing in relation to every such petitioner who is rejected for appointment --To ensure that all those petitioners who have been or will be recommended and have been / will be issued appointment orders are allowed to join their duties before the next date of hearing after completion of all codal formalities--To communicate this order to all the relevant departments and their Secretaries with direction to ensure implementation and compliance thereof in letter and spirit within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3790 Const. P. 1783/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3791 Const. P. 7221/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-20 Yes Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3792 2022 CLC 1447 Const. P. 309/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Learnd Family Judge Tando Adam & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3793 Const. P. 5649/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Ghulam Sugharan (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3794 2023 YLR 12 II.A. 58/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A S 60/2019 2019 Balach (Appellant) VS Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1270-K/2020 Balach Chandio v. Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3795 Suit 28/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHEHARYAR PARVEZ (Plaintiff) VS SINDH IND TRADING ESTATE (GUARANTEE) LTD & ORS (Defendant) S.B. Order 08-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3796 Const. P. 2195/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-20 No He points out that there is a serious apprehension that privately managed schools may expel the students or may take other coercive action against them in case of non-payment of full tuition fee due to the present dispute / situation. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that none of the petitioners will take any coercive action against any of the students who are unable to pay full tuition fee because of the prevailing situation / dispute--By consent, adjourned to 29.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Interim order passed earlier to continue till the next date of hearing. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3797 I. A 20/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 National Bank of Pakistan (Appellant) VS Abdul Sattar & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3798 Const. P. 564/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Sarwar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3799 Const. P. 747/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3800 2022 SBLR Sindh 537 H.C.A 253/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 K-Electric Ltd. (Appellant) VS Syed Anwar Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-DEC-20 Yes KESC--Whether suit is maintainable by the retired employee of the KESC in the present form? 2. Whether through the KESC Officers Policy 2010, certain benefits to the Plaintiff under the previous policy, can be withdrawn by the Defendant ? Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.507/2021 K-Electric Ltd, Karachi v. Syed Anwar Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session ]
3801 Const. P. 770/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Atta Muhammad Shahani (Petitioner) VS Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3802 II.A. 26/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nusrat and others (Appellant) VS Samina Begum and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-DEC-19 No From perusal of evidence led b the parties, I have come to the conclusion that there is no flaw and perversity in the impugned judgments and decrees rendered of both the learned courts below, warranting interference of this Court, which has limited jurisdiction and the aforesaid issues have already been settled by both the courts below in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.94-K/2020 Nusrat and others v. Samina Begum and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3803 Const. P. 192/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sikandar Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3804 Const. P. 7450/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imran Ahmed Khanzada & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.594-K/2021 Mst.Tabassum Abbasi v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3805 Const. P. 808/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3806 2022 PLD Sindh 138 Const. P. 787/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Muhammad Yousuf & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-20 No We have seen that Petitioners prayer to quash the order dated 21.4.2010 passed by District Officer (Revenue & Estate) whereby their application was rejected, prima-facie seems to be not maintainable before this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, for the simple reason that they have remedy under Revenue laws as discussed supra and it is for them to take resort; besides above and pendency of the case before Honorable Supreme Court, at this stage no conclusive findings can be given by this Court on the issues involved in this matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3807 R.A (Civil Revision) 24/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Malook & Ors (Applicant) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3808 Const. P. 6388/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Zaki Haider (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3809 Const. P. 1830/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amjad Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.87-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Amjad Hussain & others,C.P.750-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Amjad Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
3810 Const. P. 4525/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Razi Ahmed (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3811 Const. P. 1738/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Nizamuddin (Petitioner) VS WAPDA, and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1437-K/2020 Nizamuddin Memon v. Water and Power Development Authority & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3812 Const. P. 6027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Kanwar Naveed Jameel (MPA) (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3813 Const. P. 1051/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Khizar Hayat Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3814 Const. P. 422/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Qurban Ali Mako (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3815 Const. P. 674/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3816 Const. P. 2184/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Humayoon (Petitioner) VS PO Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3817 Civil Revision 189/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ashraf (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3818 Const. P. 5814/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Tariq Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 No In the above circumstances, respondents 1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to ensure that proper rules are framed and are placed before this Court without fail on or before the next date of hearing. Let notice be issued to respondents 1 and 2 for compliance. Till the next date of hearing, parties are directed to maintain status quo with regard to the present status of the petitioners. To be listed on 10.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3819 Const. P. 6534/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Saleem Kiyani (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3820 Const. P. 15/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azadeh Sardari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3821 Const. P. 1132/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Saeeduddin Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3822 Cr.Tran 55/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Zahid Hussain Pirzado & Anor (Appellant) VS The State & Anor (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3823 Const. P. 755/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ashfaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3824 Const. P. 6908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS The Registrar High Court of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-20 No . We have scanned the file and nothing is available on record to suggest that the petitioner was gainfully employed during the period that he was kept away from his job. The decision of respondent No.2 to the extent of treating the period with effect from 01.12.2014 to 06.11.2018 as extraordinary leave without pay is erroneous for the simple reason that the petitioner was reinstated in service by the order of Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal and no appeal was preferred against the said order. We have noted that respondent No.2 has not assigned valid reasons to decline the back benefits to the petitioner for the aforesaid period. Therefore, the Petitioner is entitled to the back benefits after his reinstatement in service under the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3825 Const. P. 2889/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahmed Kehar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-20 Yes We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. We, based on contentions of the parties with the material produced before us, have concluded that we cannot determine the veracity of these documents, their claims, and counter-claims as these are disputed questions of facts between the parties, which cannot be adjudicated by this Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction and leave it for the Competent Authority to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the present petition filed by the petitioner cannot be maintained--This Court, on the issue of fake appointments in the department of the Government, is guided by the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others V/S Aamir Junaid and others 2015 SCMR 74. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3826 Const. P. 653/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahnawaz Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3827 Const. P. 2419/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghazala Rehman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3828 Const. P. 2/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Salman Bari S/o Abdul Bari (Petitioner) VS Samia Khan and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JAN-21 Yes Under Article 199 of Constitution, Petitioner seeks recall of order dated 01.12.2020, whereby non-bailable warrants (NBWs) was issued against the petitioner-- Section 51, CPC-- In the present case, the petitioner has specifically, pleaded that he had already paid a partial payment of Rs.2,71,000/- (Rupees Two Lac and Seventy-One Thousand) to the private respondent vide statement dated 10.11.2020 (available at page 73 of memo of petition) and undertake to pay the remaining amount within a reasonable time as per his financial position-- In the light of the aforesaid legal position of the case and an undertaking of the petitioner, the operation of NBWs issued against him by the learned trial Court is converted into BWs, enabling him to furnish security / appropriate bond equivalent to the remaining amount before the learned trial Court. However, the petitioner is directed to appear before the trial Court on the next date of hearing and in case of failure, the order passed by the learned trial Court on 01.12.2020 shall be operative. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.216-K/2024 Salman Bari v. Samia Khan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Dismissed as Not Pressed
3829 Const. P. 248/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faiz Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes Government accommodation in police department Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.819/2024 Cantonment Board Clifton thr. Cantonment Executive Officer, Karachi v. Mrs, Shehla Balal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 05-Aug-24)
3830 Const. P. 3264/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mukhtiar Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3831 Const. P. 4532/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imtiaz Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3832 Const. P. 6533/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3833 Const. P. 4210/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mumtaz Ahmed Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-20 Yes Essentially in service jurisprudence, appointment, promotion is of utmost importance. If these are made on merit in accordance with definite rules, instructions, etc., and the same will rightly be considered and treated as part of the terms and conditions of service of a civil/government servant, which cannot be interfered with under the constitutional jurisdiction, under the service law, besides that the petitioner has no vested right to claim promotion against the post which was meant for initial appointment, therefore, the petitioner is precluded to ask for the actualization of his alleged promotion made by DPC-II which was rightly cancelled. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3834 Criminal Appeal 189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Azhar Ali & another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
3835 Const. P. 320/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Samina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3836 Const. P. 3075/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Tufail (Petitioner) VS Chief Naval Staff and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-20 Yes Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect? Petitioner was discharged from service of Pakistan Navy vide office order dated 11.3.2014 in terms of rule 0240 of Naval Regulation. The petitioner has invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court, seeking declaration to the effect that the entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Pakistan Navy, culminating into his conviction were mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice, thus liable to be annulled---i) Whether jurisdiction of this court is barred under Article 199(3) of the Constitution? ii) Whether major punishment awarded by the Field General Court Martial against the petitioner was mala fide, without jurisdiction and coram non judice? iii) Whether the offence, said to have been committed by the petitioner, was a civil offence or a military offence falls under the Pakistan Army Act, 1952, if so, to what effect? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3837 2022 PLC (CS) 481 Const. P. 4941/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jameel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-20 Yes PTCL-Voluntarily Separation Scheme (VSS)--we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in October 2020 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to him in June 2008, i.e. approximately 12 years before filing of the instant petition--Dismissed in limine. we are of the considered view that the instant petition falls within the doctrine of laches as the petitioner filed the instant petition in November 2011 whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to her in June 2008 when her late husband availed the benefits of VSS, i.e. approximately 04 years before the filing of the instant petition. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3838 Cr.Misc. 16/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 P.C Nasir Hussain Arain (Applicant) VS Hasnain Shah & 3 Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
3839 Const. P. 5578/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Anwar Hussain and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3840 Const. P. 5580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s K-Electric (Petitioner) VS Javed Akhtar and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-DEC-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3841 Const. P. 3055/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Maqsood Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JAN-21 Yes Since respondent No 3 has crossed the age of 60 years and left his position from KPT, no further action is required. However, it is made clear that he is not entitled to a second pension from KPT due to his illegal deputation and subsequent absorption in KPT in the intervening period without the approval of the competent authority as discussed in the preceding paragraphs---Before parting with this order, it may be observed that even on moral ground, the illegalities committed by the management of KPT and respondent No.3, being a retired naval forces personnel and a patriot, was expected to act honestly in the best interest of the country. However, he chose not only to get himself illegally absorbed in KPT, but also claimed and received pension from their different services causing heavy loss to the national exchequer. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1325/2021 CDR (R) Khalid Munir v. Maqsood Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3842 Const. P. 3194/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3843 Const. P. 521/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Fauji Fertilizers Co. Ltd (Petitioner) VS Syed Jawad Ali Shah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.3151/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh and others v. M/s Sunny Floor Mill, through Attorney, Muhammad Hassan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3844 Const. P. 1018/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 Yes the decision of PSB-II for promoting the private respondent No.8 in BPS-19 against future vacancy in absence of ACRs is/was an erroneous decision--ACRs--it is directed that the Government of Sindh shall ensure that in future before convening the meeting of PSB and/or DPC for considering the cases for promotion of civil / Government servants, the department concerned shall provide the complete set of ACRs / PERs of the concerned officer to PSB / DPC well in advance so that the cases for promotion should be decided without any delay. It may be observed that if the promotion of any civil / Government servant is deferred or delayed after passing of this order for want of ACR / PER, the Secretary of the department concerned, the competent authority, and all officials responsible for deferring or delaying the promotion shall be held personally responsible for defiance of the above direction of this Court. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3845 Const. P. 6018/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ali Gul Kalyar (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 Yes vacation for official accommodation Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3846 Const. P. 347/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Arshad Arain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3847 Const. P. 3285/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3848 Const. P. 863/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Faysal Bank Limited (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3849 Const. P. 1737/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Raheel Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3850 Const. P. 442/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3851 Const. P. 6048/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Zafar (Petitioner) VS Printing Corp of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3852 Const. P. 3551/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khan Habib Afridi & 2070 Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3853 Const. P. 730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Asim Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-20 Yes The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. The petitioners have alleged that the subject school buildings in Districts Badin and Matiari are in dilapidated and dangerous condition, and are not fit or safe for the use of children who come there regularly for education purposes--The present cases deal with the issue of maintenance of Government school buildings situated in the interior Sindh, which are in precarious condition and need immediate repairs and regular maintenance--25% from each of the (i) District Development Fund / Budget, (ii) Bonus Production Fund and (iii) Social Welfare Fund, in respect of every District in the Province of Sindh, shall be allocated and utilized by the Government of Sindh only for the repairs and maintenance of the Government school buildings of the respective District--The Government of Sindh and District Oversight Committee shall maintain proper accounts of the above funds at all times--Allowed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3854 Const. P. 757/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Yar Muhammad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3855 Const. P. 2414/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 TYMS Education Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-20 No Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 14.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Till the next date of hearing, operation of clauses (ii) and (iv) of the impugned special order dated 28.04.2020 shall remain suspended. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3856 Const. P. 1801/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3857 Const. P. 1055/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Molvi Muhammad Hassan Pathan (Petitioner) VS Home Secretary & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3858 Const. P. 438/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Faruukh Arfeen (Petitioner) VS GM HR USC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3859 Const. P. 858/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Taqi Muhammad Rajper (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 Yes Government Accommodation Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3860 Const. P. 1566/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3861 Const. P. 601/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Nadia Mirani (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
3862 Const. P. 1753/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Mazhar Ali Chandio & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3863 Const. P. 715/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 MUHAMMAD Juman (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3864 Const. P. 2093/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Azam (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3865 Const. P. 1769/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-20 Yes Contempt--In our view, we cannot enlarge the scope of the main disposal order and do not find any violation of the order passed by this Court as his termination is a separate, subsequent and fresh cause of action which has already been impugned by him through a separate petition as noted above. Resultantly, CMA No. 23812 of 2017 along with pending applications is dismissed with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.317-K/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3866 Const. P. 2216/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Ashraf Khatti and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 Yes Contempt Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3867 Const. P. 2477/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Amolakh Das (Petitioner) VS Speaker Provincial Assembly of SIndh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No Service matter regarding repateriation Notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh for 29.05.2020 at 10:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3868 Const. P. 961/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Rustam Ali (Petitioner) VS Dr Sikandar Ali & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3869 Const. P. 576/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3870 Const. P. 1488/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Sindhu Abbas Leghari (Petitioner) VS Major (R) Omer Farooq (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3871 Cr.Misc. 295/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Fouzia @ Waziran (Applicant) VS SSP District Jamshoro & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3872 Const. P. 5646/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sahiba (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3873 Const. P. 630/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-20 Yes We have noticed that the respondents have complied with the direction of the Honorable Supreme Court passed in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 in C.A. 30-K of 2014 and Crl. M.A 37-K of 2017 in Crl. Orig. P No.15-k of 2016 and petitioner has been given a proforma promotion in BPS-20 with effect from 12.3.2017 one day before his retirement from service on 13.3.2017; thus no further indulgence of this court is required in the matter. It is well-settled that proforma promotion cannot be awarded to a retired government servant with retrospective effect as per dicta laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Government of Pakistan and others vs. Hameed Akhtar Niazi and others, PLD 2003 SC 110--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3874 Const. P. 6537/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Khawaja Haider Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3875 Const. P. 591/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Okash Khalid Memon & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-FEB-20 Yes Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (???DRTA???) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Prime grievance of the petitioners is that Recruitment Rules, framed for the post of Secretary (BPS-17), District Regional Transport Authorities (DRTA) and notified on 13.7.2011, provide no room for posting of outsiders, but the respondents in deviation of aforesaid rules are posting the officers of other cadre against the post of Secretary (BPS-17), DRTA---Much emphasis has been laid that the post of Secretary, DRTA, can be filled by the officers of other cadres. We have also noticed that the six (06) posts of Secretary (BPS-17), RTA, and one post of Secretary (BPS-17), PTA, do fall within the ambit of cadre schedule in respect of posts to be filled by officers of PAS, Ex-PCS and PSS. As such, the aforesaid post can only be filled as per Recruitment Rules and subject to eligibility and entitlement, and not otherwise for the simple reason that Provincial Transport Department is a separate cadre and Recruitment Rules are already in the field. The said rules are framed in consultation with the Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Government of Sindh in pursuance with sub-rule (2) of Rule 3 of the Rules, 1974. In view of the above, we do not agree with the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.433-K/2020 Okash Khalid Memon v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
3876 Const. P. 2308/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zubair Javed (Petitioner) VS Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-20 Yes Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of impugned Notification dated 21.04.2020 (page 37) shall remain suspended. To be listed on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. along with C.P No.D-6431/2019. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3877 Const. P. 536/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3878 Const. P. 3234/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Habib ul Hassan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3879 Const. P. 631/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3880 Const. P. 103/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Anjleena (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Umerkot & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3881 Const. P. 70/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aqsa Jawed (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Haseen & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.825-K/2020 Muhammad Haseen v. Aqsa Jawed Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
3882 Const. P. 435/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3883 Const. P. 6528/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Akhtar Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3884 Const. P. 190/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Darya Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3885 Const. P. 699/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nizam U Din Unar (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3886 Const. P. 2512/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abrar Ali Khichi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3887 Const. P. 5829/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Essa (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3888 Const. P. 1900/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sindh Technical Education & Vocational Training (Petitioner) VS Provincial Ombudsman Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3889 Const. P. 4615/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3890 Const. P. 4925/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Nazir Ahmed Palijo (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-21 Yes In the light of the above discussion, it is demonstrably clear that the petitioner has not been denied or deprived of a legal right. He has not sustained an injury to any legally protected interest. The impugned working paper does not operate as a decision against him, much less does it wrongfully affect his title to something. He has not been subjected to a legal wrong. He has suffered no legal grievance. He has no legal peg for a justifiable claim to hang on. However the petitioner has only sustainable cause to be considered for promotion in BS-20 subject to qualification, experience, and availably of the post, however, the petitioner is not precluded to ask for consideration of his case for promotion as per Rule 13 of Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation, and Seniority) Rules, 1975 by PSB-I which is going to take place in the ensuing month. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3891 Const. P. 2757/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Yahya Khan Tunio (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3892 Const. P. 2743/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Alma Bibi Baran (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3893 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 557/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3894 Const. P. 1699/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 U.B.L (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3895 Const. P. 1437/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s BOL Enterprises Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Appellat Authority EOBI & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3896 Const. P. 4704/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shah Murad and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.979/2021 Rahamdil and others v. Shah Murad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3897 Const. P. 3590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Water & Power Development & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.559-K/2021 The Wapda through its Director (Legal) v. Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi & others,C.P.656-K/2021 Aijaz Ahmed Qureshi v. Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
3898 Const. P. 7236/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Ali Hasnain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3899 Const. P. 3228/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Misri Ladhani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-SEP-21 Yes prima-facie the claim of the Petitioner for proforma promotion is tenable under the law for the simple reason that CSB recommended his promotion in BS-21 during his tenure of service, in the meanwhile, he reached the age of superannuation, just after the recommendation made by SCB in his favour, as a consequence, the pay of the petitioner is required to be re-fixed and his post-retirement benefits will be re- calculated by allowing his proforma promotion in BS-21 and arrears shall be paid to him with 6% simple interest per annum--The competent authority of respondents is directed to notify the proforma promotion of the petitioner in BS-21 with effect from 13.02.2014 i.e. the date on which the CSB recommended his case for promotion in BS-21 and other ancillary benefits under the law, without discrimination, within 02 weeks Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5548/2021,C.A.21/2022,C.A.22/2022,C.P.5779/2021 SCP Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Leave Granted..to be fixed after 3 months
3900 Const. P. 5655/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sami Pharmaceuticals (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3901 Const. P. 5603/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shoaib Ahmed Malik (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3902 Const. P. 4382/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Denim Clothing Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3903 Const. P. 4938/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pearl Fabrics Company & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3904 Const. P. 2732/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Tajamul Hassan Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.30-K/2021 Tajamul Hassan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others,C.P.746-K/2021 Tajamul Hassan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ]
3905 Const. P. 1497/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1089-K/2021 Pakistan National Shipping Corporation through its Chairman v. Nasir Kamal & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3906 Const. P. 6182/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahsan Nisar Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1397/2021,C.P.5140/2021,C.P.1065-K/2022,C.A.3980/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3907 Const. P. 4534/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Faisal Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 Yes Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2744/2022 Faisal Rasheed v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3908 Const. P. 8000/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2934/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.475/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.477/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard Pvt. Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending ,Pending
3909 Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
3910 Const. P. 7376/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdullah Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.748-K/2021 Abdullah v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others,C.A.32-K/2021 Abdullah v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ]
3911 Const. P. 1206/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Ghaffar Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3912 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 70/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Collector of Customs MCC Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s. Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Brothers & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3913 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 546/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3914 Const. P. 7241/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif Mirza (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3915 Const. P. 2714/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Qamaruddin Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3916 Const. P. 1923/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rao Muhammad kamran & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1386/2021,C.P.5129/2021,C.P.3991/2022,C.A.4017/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3917 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 550/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3918 Const. P. 6588/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Swiss Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3919 Const. P. 1572/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Kifayat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3920 Const. P. 6221/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3921 Const. P. 687/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Faizan Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3922 Const. P. 4434/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Manzoor Shah (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No The Sindh Teaching Hospitals (Establishment of Management Board) Act, 2020 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3923 Const. P. 4243/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Sikandar Mallah and ors (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3924 Const. P. 2107/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Rasheeda Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-AUG-21 No Counsel for the respondent contends that the petitioners claim is Rs.11,52,310/- and they have processed that amount and it is expected that they will provide the same within fifteen (15) days. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3925 Const. P. 3597/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Rauf Khan (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3926 Const. P. 3291/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Azeem ur Rehim Khan Meo and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3927 Cr.Bail 124/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Talib Hussain Chachar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3928 Const. P. 4522/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Kh: Ghulam Ghous (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-21 Yes officers are posted on acting charge---Secretary Local Government says that he will examine the record as to whether Miss Shamona Sadaf is working in BPS-18 or BPS-16 till then he will relieve that lady and will not be posted on that post until the issue is resolved. In case, inquiry speaks that she is having BPS-18 or she is posted on same place on any other post and if she was working in BPS-16 and has been designated BPS-18, delinquent officers including that lady shall face the consequences to be carried out by the authorities. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3929 Criminal Appeal 18/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Arsallah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-AUG-21 Yes The present appellant has been convicted by the trial Court on the same set of facts and evidence, above mentioned, which this Court has not considered sufficient to warrant conviction of the appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016 and award them afore-mentioned sentences. So far the case of present appellant is concerned; we do not find any special features that distinguish his case/role from those of said appellants, justifying recoding conviction and sentence to present appellant. Hence, the present appellant is also entitled to the same benefit of doubt earlier extended in favour of appellants of Crl. Appeal No. 61 of 2016. Consequently, we allow this criminal appeal, set aside the conviction and sentences of appellant recorded by the trial Court vide impugned judgment and acquit him of the charges. He shall be set at liberty forthwith, if not required to be detained in any other case Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3930 Const. P. 5779/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nisar Ahmed Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-APR-21 Yes the petitioner has prayed for issuance of the writ of quo warranto against respondents 4 to 11, inter-alia, on the ground that they are not fit, eligible and qualified to hold the office of Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, and Senior Registrar in Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, (SMBBMC) and their future appointments in SMBBMC on contract are hit by Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) of the Constitution, 1973. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3931 2022 SBLR Sindh 957 Const. P. 4674/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pakistan Services Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-APR-21 Yes (i) Whether Petitioner-PSL has locus standi to approach this Court as an aggrieved party under Article 199 of the Constitution against the decisions of NIRC? (ii) Whether petitioner-PSL is a Trans-Provincial Organization and falls within the ambit of National Industrial Relations Act, 2012? (iii) Whether or not the registration of industry-wise trade unions by the Registrar, Trade Union NIRC, Islamabad is violative of the mandatory requirement of Section 8 of Act, 2012, based on strength of workforce; and, liable to be canceled, in view of mandate of Section 11 of the IRA-2012? (iv) Whether the registrar of trade unions and/or NIRC is competent to determine the registration of the respondent unions? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3497/2021 Pakistan Services Limitd, Islamabad through Director v. Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission, comprising three embers at Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3932 Const. P. 1202/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aftab Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.586-K/2021 Sindh Employees Social Security Institution v. Aftab Alam & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
3933 Const. P. 3603/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shanaz Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3934 Const. P. 1710/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3935 Cr.Rev 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Goro @ Gajan (Applicant) VS Shahnoor (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3936 Cr.Bail 216/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Asghar Gahejo (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3937 Const. P. 4486/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mian Mushtaq A. Sajid (Petitioner) VS Dr. Shireen Narejo and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3938 Const. P. 3912/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Pakistan Steel Mills (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Khursheed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3939 Const. P. 5722/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3940 Const. P. 2844/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muneer Ahmed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Health Department (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-21 Yes The petitioners have called in question, their suspension from the service order dated 01.04.2020 and subsequent order dated 18.08.2020, whereby their reinstatement in service order dated 22.7.2020 was cancelled/withdrawn by the respondent-Secretary, Health Department, Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3941 Cr.Rev 32/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Abdul Sattar son of Jamaluddin Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3942 Const. P. 5172/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imran Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Shafique and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3943 Const. P. 8038/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zafar Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.202-K/2022 Zafar Ahmed & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3944 Const. P. 8038/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zafar Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.202-K/2022 Zafar Ahmed & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
3945 Cr.Bail 285/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Suhail Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3946 Const. P. 2580/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noman Ahmed Khan and Others (Petitioner) VS Board of Intermdiate Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3947 Const. P. 5455/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Inayatullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 Yes The petitioner has challenged the notification dated 02.09.2021, in respect of his posting and transfer order as Principal (BS-20) National AGRO Technical Training Centre Hyderabad on the ground, inter alia, that the impugned notification was issued to post him under the junior officer--We are of the view that Article 212 of the Constitution ousts the jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the matters about terms and conditions of Civil Servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3948 Const. P. 4577/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Muhammasd Younus and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1391/2021,C.P.5134/2021,C.P.3916/2022,C.A.4011/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3949 Const. P. 2281/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Juman Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3950 Const. P. 2363/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imtiaz Ali Isani (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
3951 Cr.Bail 165/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Azhar Ali Buledi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3952 Const. P. 6218/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Faraz Ahmed Wajidi (Petitioner) VS Chancellor DOW University (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-21 Yes The caption petition has raised substantial questions of law involving interpretation of the certain provisions of The DOW University of Health Sciences Act, 2004 (`Act-2004`) and the Dow Employees (Service) Statute, 2007, and the principles governing the Writ of Quo Warranto as well as the power of the syndicate/competent authority of respondent-University to make a contractual appointment under the Act-2004 as amended up-to-date and Service Statute 2007--In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee of respondent-university ought not to be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the competent authority, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess the candidature of a candidate for regular appointment or on contract basis, on case to case basis. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan and others (2014 SCMR 157). In the instant case, prima-facie, the competent authority has assessed the candidature of the private respondents and appointed them in the respondent-university, which does not require interference at our end. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3953 Const. P. 689/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Mst Inayat Jabeen (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3954 Const. P. 1441/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rashid Azeem & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1384/2021,C.P.5127/2021,C.P.3915/2022,C.A.4010/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
3955 Const. P. 639/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Ismail & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3956 Cr.Bail 890/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 MUHAMMAD ALI RAJPUT (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3957 Const. P. 2593/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Rao Talib Hussain & anothers (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.6489/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited through its M.D. Karachi and others v. Rao Muhammad Asif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3958 Const. P. 673/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Nawaz (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3959 Const. P. 1491/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Akhlaue Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3960 Const. P. 1761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS The Appellate Authority Board of Trustee EOBI, & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-DEC-21 Yes CP No. D- 1761 of 2011 CP No. D- 1763 of 2011 CP No. D- 614 of 2012 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3961 Const. P. 614/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mst:Akbaro (Petitioner) VS Appellate Authority Board Of Trustee E.O.B.I, & Or (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3962 Cr.Bail 1731/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD AWAIS S/O SALAHUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes whether, the criminal prosecution in such a circumstances, as required under Section 195 Cr.P.C., could be initiated at the complaint of the said Court and not by the private person---Primarily, the entire case as put forward by the parties, depends upon the documentary evidence, which is available with the prosecution; and it is yet to be determined by the learned trial Court, whether Sections 420, 468, 471 PPC are attracted in the present crime or otherwise, which could only be done, after recording of the evidence; besides that there is a delay of almost two years in lodging the FIR, which is sufficient ground to confirm the pre-arrest bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3963 Const. P. 1027/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3964 Const. P. 1102/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 MS Beenish Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh And Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3965 Conf.Case 23/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Hassan @ Ali Hassan (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-DEC-21 Yes The murder of two persons at the hands of appellant has although been proved beyond a shadow of doubt but the motive alleged has not been established. All these factors point out to circumstances overwhelmingly mitigating in nature and justify conversion of death sentence. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and conviction of the appellant is maintained but his death sentence is converted into life imprisonment each against each murder. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3966 Cr.Misc. 689/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Pir Shoaib Ahmed Qureshi and others (Applicant) VS SHO PS Khadhar SBA and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3967 Const. P. 10/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Dr. Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
3968 Const. P. 466/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ajaz-ul-Haque (Petitioner) VS Mst. Urooj & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3969 Const. P. 733/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Kashif Fatah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3970 Const. P. 739/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Fahad Fatah Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3971 Cr.Bail 2284/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 NOOR MUHAMMAD S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-DEC-21 Yes seeking admission on post-arrest bail in FIR No.732/2021 of PS Shahrah-e-Noorjehan, Karachi registered under Sections 397/34 PPC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3972 Cr.Bail 801/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 FAYAZ HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3973 Cr.Misc. 691/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 KHUDA BUX (Applicant) VS SAJJAD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3974 Const. P. 526/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS HESCO Hyderabad and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3975 Cr.Bail 1006/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Lal Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3976 Const. P. 1343/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3977 Const. P. 1471/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shahid Ahmed Khan Qaboolio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3978 Cr.Misc. 93/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rehmeed Raja (Applicant) VS SSP SBA & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3979 Const. P. 656/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rao Abdur Razik & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
3980 Cr.Misc. 619/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 NAZAKAT ABBAS (Applicant) VS D.I.G POLICE HYD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3981 Cr.Bail 2271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD TAHIR S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes post-arrest bail in FIR No.451/2021 for offences punishable under sections 269, 270 PPC & 8(i) of Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale & Use of Gutka and Manpuri, Act 2019 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3982 Const. P. 754/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Faraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3983 Civil Revision 221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 P.O Sindh and others (Applicant) VS Ahmed Nawaz and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3984 Const. P. 791/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sahil Ladhani (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3985 First Appeal Against Order 21/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Irfan son of Abdul Ghani (Appellant) VS The Province of Sindh (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3986 Const. P. 1894/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Ashraf Arain (Petitioner) VS Water and Power Development Authority (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3987 Const. P. 509/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Noorullah Dehraj (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3988 Const. P. 1277/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mukhtiar Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3989 Const. P. 1543/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Behram Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3990 Criminal Miscelleneous 763/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SYED MUHAMMAD AHMED RAZA & ORS (Applicant) VS IIIRD ADJ KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes Primarily, there is a trend to use false F.I.R. and fabricated complaints to take revenge from someone. It has become a strong mechanism for the attack on mental health, reputation, and the creation of fear. In criminal matters the procedure of registration of cases in courts is provided under sections 154, 154(3), 156(3), 190 CrPC, and Private Complaint made before Magistrate under section 200 Cr.P.C., false FIR and complaints mean making false allegations and lodging FIR or complaints based on conspired fabricated facts and circumstances to harass the other person by misuse of law and judicial proceedings. The police are obliged to register FIR for all cognizable offenses and to pursue the investigation with due process of law. Innocent people, who are implicated in false cases under a malicious FIR, face many problems due to these legal procedures. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3991 Const. P. 2990/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Athar Javed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.151-K/2022 The Chief Executive Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO) v. Athar Javed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
3992 Const. P. 479/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mushtaque Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3993 2023 SBLR Sindh 1299 Cr.Bail 1800/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FAISAL MALIK S/O MALIK MUHAMMAD EJAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 Yes seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No.553/2021 of PS Darakhshan, District South, Karachi registered for the offense under Section 489-F PPC Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3994 Const. P. 2346/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mukhtiar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Shoukat Ali (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3995 Const. P. 147/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Manzoor Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3996 Const. P. 1025/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Jaman Khyber (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3997 Const. P. 2063/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Haji Dodo Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3998 Const. P. 690/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ishaque Khan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
3999 Cr.Bail 2434/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MIR NOSH KHAN S/O TANOSH KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4000 Const. P. 1216/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Martha Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4001 2023 SBLR Sindh 94 Const. P. 1430/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst Touqeer Fatima Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4002 Const. P. 163/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raheem Shaikh (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4003 Const. P. 4752/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Tipu Sultan (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4004 Const. P. 328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Imdad Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4005 Const. P. 1536/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 shafi Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4006 Const. P. 821/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Usman Moazzam (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4007 Const. P. 1559/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nazar Muhammad and Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4008 Const. P. 3227/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rasool and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4009 Const. P. 5143/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Tariq Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.639-K/2022 Dr.Tariq Ahmed Shaikh v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
4010 Const. P. 882/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mst Mehwish & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Sukkur & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4011 Const. P. 7040/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pak Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Arsalan Hassan and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1645/2022 Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pakistan (Pvt) Limited Karachi v. Arsalan Hassan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4012 Const. P. 7566/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Qasim (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Govt. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4013 Const. P. 5231/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Hyderabad Tax Bar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4014 Const. P. 5987/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waqar Ali Khoso and Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.473-K/2022 Ghayasuddin Shahani & others v. The Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4015 Const. P. 1916/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pir Bux Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Orss (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4016 Const. P. 1400/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4017 Const. P. 804/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Ramzan Pathan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4018 Const. P. 1021/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4019 M.A. 47/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Ltd (Appellant) VS The Court of District Judge, Khi East and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4020 Const. P. 2795/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1716/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4021 Const. P. 7241/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Saleem Baloch and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-22 Yes In view of the foregoing, we find that a five-member Bench of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Gul Taiz Khan Marwat (supra) has decided the question of maintainability of a Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution against the administrative orders passed by an Administrative Committee or the Honorable Chief Justice of High Court. Besides that, all the legal grounds raised by the learned Counsel for the petitioners in the present petition have already been set at naught by the Honorable Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions as such this Court cannot further dilate upon the issue more. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4022 Const. P. 849/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mustafa Saeed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-21 Yes whether relaxation up to fifteen years in upper age limit, under sub-rule (2) of Rule 12 of the Sind Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974, applies to the appointments against the posts in BPS-16 and 17 to be filled through SPSC Competitive Examination-2021. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.183-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary Forest & Wildlife Department, Government of Sindh & others v. Mustafa Saeed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4023 Const. P. 1062/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Prof: (Retd) Dr. Syed Ehtesham ul Haque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.393-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. (Rtd) Dr. Syed Ehteshamul Haque & others,C.P.2192/2022 Prof. Dr. Khalid Mahmood Iraqi v. Prof. (Retd) Dr. Syed Ehteshamul Haque and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
4024 Const. P. 7270/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Basit Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4025 2023 PLC CS 447 Const. P. 7528/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shahnawaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.517-K/2023 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others v. Shahnawaz & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
4026 Const. P. 3083/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Pir Bux Solangi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4027 Const. P. 14/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Uzma Umar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4028 Const. P. 518/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.149-K/2022 Gul Muhammad & others v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4029 Const. P. 5613/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Aftab Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4030 Const. P. 994/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Haji Rafiuddin Waliuddin and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4031 Const. P. 1235/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4032 Const. P. 349/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s. J. Food Products Thr. Muhammad Asif Memon (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4033 Const. P. 5671/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Wali Khan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4034 Const. P. 411/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Najaf Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4035 Const. P. 5676/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Waheed Iqbal and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4036 Const. P. 2834/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Y.B Holdings Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4037 M.A. 3/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Shamim Bano (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4038 Const. P. 4861/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hadi Bux Siyal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4039 Const. P. 5102/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4040 Const. P. 3870/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Karachi Grain Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4041 Const. P. 4369/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Fine Towel and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4042 Const. P. 1315/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sher Nawaz (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.497-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department & others v. Abdul Shakoor Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4043 Const. P. 918/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Asif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
4044 M.A. 45/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Imam Bux & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4045 Const. P. 4311/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Hassan Textiles (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4046 Const. P. 2739/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4047 M.A. 46/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Rano & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4048 Const. P. 6788/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Zafar Iqbal Shams (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4049 Const. P. 2355/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s S. Abdullah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4050 Const. P. 4148/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Abbass (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4051 Const. P. 3052/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ayaz Ali Thahim (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-22 Yes suspension Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4052 Const. P. 564/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Mehrun Nisa & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4053 Const. P. 382/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Salma & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4054 Const. P. 126/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Hashim & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4055 Const. P. 126/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Qutub Ali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4056 Const. P. 492/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mohammad Sudher (Petitioner) VS D.I.G Hyd & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4057 Const. P. 802/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Chandan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4058 Const. P. 3058/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Dr. Khair Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4059 Const. P. 332/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Saji & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4060 Cr.Bail 89/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Bail Appln. No.S-90 of 2022 2022 Mukhtiar Ali Gopang & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4061 Const. P. 283/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Yasin & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4062 Const. P. 529/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Hyder Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Naseem Fatima (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4063 Const. P. 444/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Bushra & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4064 Const. P. 594/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zainab & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4065 Cr.Bail 10/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdullah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4066 Const. P. 597/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Akber (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4067 Const. P. 688/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Idrees Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4068 II.A. 33/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Azhar Ilyas (Appellant) VS Govt Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4069 R.A (Civil Revision) 3/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Mazahir Hussain (Applicant) VS Syed Tajammul Hussain & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4070 Const. P. 7076/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Murtaza and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.533-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4071 Const. P. 7079/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ahmed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.536-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Zeeshan Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4072 Const. P. 646/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Afsana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4073 Const. P. 839/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Sarfaraz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3038/2023 Ghulam Rasool v. Province of Sindh through the Secretary Education Department, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4074 Const. P. 128/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Amanat (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4075 Const. P. 4911/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Sajid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4076 Const. P. 726/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muneer Ahmed Naich (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
4077 Const. P. 715/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Shoukat Ali Chahwan (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Mustafa & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4078 Const. P. 721/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Yasir Ali Channa (Petitioner) VS Jaffar Hussain & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4079 2023 SBLR Sindh 98 Const. P. 1584/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst, Saabi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4080 Const. P. 1247/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Asghar Narejo and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.447-K/2023 The Chief Executive Officer Pakistan Steel Mills & another v. Ghulam Asghar Narejo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4081 Const. P. 7708/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Imtiaz Provision Store (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4082 Const. P. 4744/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Majeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.520-K/2023 Abdul Majeed Khan v. Federation of Pakistan through Finance Secretary Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
4083 Const. P. 605/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Safia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4084 Const. P. 426/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Saira and another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4085 Const. P. 500/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4086 Const. P. 2856/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Shakeel ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4087 Const. P. 4060/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdullah Shah (Petitioner) VS Home Sect: & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.732-K/2023 Home Secretary Home Department Govt. of Sindh & others v. Abdullah Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4088 Const. P. 4060/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdullah Shah (Petitioner) VS Home Sect: & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.732-K/2023 Home Secretary Home Department Govt. of Sindh & others v. Abdullah Shah Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4089 Const. P. 612/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muhammad Farooque (Petitioner) VS SHO P.S Muhammad Odho & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4090 Cr.Bail 147/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Farhan Illahi Mahar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4091 Const. P. 860/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Aamir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4092 Const. P. 2901/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Qazi Khalid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.147-K/2023 Qazi Khalid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan through its Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned for next Session.
4093 Const. P. 5863/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noman Shah and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1106-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Secretary to Govt. of Sindh Police Department & others v. Noman Shah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4094 Const. P. 3036/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Shehroz and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1712/2023 Muhammad Haider and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Aviation Division Pakistan Secretariat, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4095 Const. P. 5059/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Rukhsana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4096 R.A (Civil Revision) 63/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ismail (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ahsan (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4097 Const. P. 1813/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Naveed Hussain Tunio (Petitioner) VS V.C SMIU & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4098 Const. P. 653/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Syed Nazeer-ul-Hassan (Petitioner) VS S.P Comlaint Cell hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4099 Const. P. 98/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Nabi Ahmedani (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4100 Const. P. 112/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sht. Rekha (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4101 Const. P. 350/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shahnawaz Chandio (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4102 Const. P. 686/1995 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1995 Moule Dino and others (Petitioner) VS Matloob Hussain and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1319-K/2022 Matloob Hussain deceased through his LRs: & others v. Moule Dino deceased through his legal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4103 Const. P. 751/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer Highway Division Shikarpur (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4104 Const. P. 82/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Urooj Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4105 Const. P. 615/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Nawab (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4106 Criminal Miscelleneous 593/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 NIAZ HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS IMRAN KHAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4107 Const. P. 163/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Haji Manzoor Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chairman WAPDA & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4108 Const. P. 2833/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sohail Shehzad & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2267/2022 Sohail Shehzad and another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4109 Const. P. 120/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mrs. Aseem Khalid (Petitioner) VS Secretary Schools Education & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4110 Cr.Bail 980/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Laiq Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4111 Const. P. 3944/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Murad Sipio (Petitioner) VS E.O..B.I & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4112 Const. P. 748/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sht. Hamee and another (Petitioner) VS P.O. Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4113 Const. P. 1375/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.944/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rafiq and another,C.A.16/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rafiq and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
4114 Const. P. 3013/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Sadoro and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4115 Const. P. 7083/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Javed Iqbal and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.540-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Javed Iqbal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4116 Const. P. 570/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nasreen Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4117 Cr.Bail 263/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mehrab Bangulani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4118 Const. P. 6360/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran Shamshad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.558-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another v. Kamran Shamshad,C.P.500-K/2023 Kamran Shamshad v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
4119 Cr.Bail 339/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Sagheer (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4120 Const. P. 684/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Yaqoob (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4121 Const. P. 685/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Usman Ghani (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4122 Const. P. 3505/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Aminullah Bhutto (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4123 Const. P. 698/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Majid Channa (Petitioner) VS Manzoor Ahmed Noonari (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4124 Const. P. 633/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Asif Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Kamber and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4125 Criminal Miscelleneous 243/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 AZHAR ALI (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD ACHAR & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4126 Criminal Miscelleneous 488/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Aijaz Ali (Applicant) VS SSP Comp Cell Dadu (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 14-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4127 R.A (Civil Revision) 15/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Mst: Begum and Others (Applicant) VS Irshad Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4128 Criminal Appeal 106/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zulfiqar Ali and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4129 Const. P. 4321/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zahid Akhtar Siddique and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.575-K/2023 Zahid Akhtar Siddique & others v. Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Production. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4130 Const. P. 1481/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Sajjad Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4131 2023 SBLR Sindh 952 Const. P. 5552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mansoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4132 I. A 1/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Ali Bux Shah (Appellant) VS The Chief Administrator Auqaf Sindh Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1218-K/2022 Syed Ali Bux Shah v. The Chief Administrator Auqaf Sindh Hyderabad & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4133 Const. P. 1372/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Rehan (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.941/2023 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another,C.A.13/2024 National Bank of Pakistan through its President & CEO, Karachi and another v. Muhammad Rehan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
4134 Const. P. 5646/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s M. Pak Flour Mills (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4135 Const. P. 838/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Farhan Khan Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4136 Const. P. 490/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sultan Joyo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4137 Const. P. 396/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Kulsoom & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4138 Const. P. 152/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Shirimati Moran & aother (Petitioner) VS S.S.P Sanghar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4139 Const. P. 6122/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3166/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
4140 Const. P. 516/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Unilever Pakistan ltd (Petitioner) VS E.O.B.I & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4141 Const. P. 6121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-JUN-23 Yes Prima-facie, there is no concept of hardship in qualifying for the Departmental Examination. Therefore, the competent authority has exercised the jurisdiction without lawful justification by allowing the private respondents to be promoted to the next rank, and we have also reservations against the confirmation of the service of the private respondents who had not qualified for the departmental examination of Collector Part-I and II within the stipulated period. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3165/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
4142 Const. P. 1945/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sh. Amjad & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4143 Const. P. 6119/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3163/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another,C.P.L.A.3219/2023 Makhdoom Shakil uz Zaman v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
4144 Const. P. 1896/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Jalal uddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4145 Cr.Bail 477/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AQEEL AHMED KHAN S/O MALIK JAVED AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4146 Const. P. 82/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 J.S Baink Limited (Petitioner) VS Sahib Dino Soomro & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4147 Const. P. 3409/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Rauf and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-JUN-23 Yes It is now settled law that the merger of service of civil servants in different Cadres, Services, and Posts of the Government Departments as envisaged under sections 8 and 9 of the SCS Act, 1973, against their Service Rules, is a nullity in the eyes of law and violative of the dicta laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch, and Muhammad Bachal Memon case, supra. The learned AAG has failed to make submissions on the principles laid down in the above judgments and instead has submitted that PMS Rules have been made under the administrative domain by the executive which arguments is negated by the aforesaid judgments. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4148 Const. P. 5550/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Imtiaz Ahmed Mangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4149 Const. P. 585/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS Ali Abid Buledi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4150 II.A. 107/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Siddique. (Appellant) VS Muhammad Ali trough LRs. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 19-MAY-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4151 Cr.Bail 1363/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ATIQ UR REHMAN S/O NOSAHAD KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4152 Criminal Miscelleneous 712/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MST. SADAF PERVAIZ BHATTY (Applicant) VS THE STAE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4153 Criminal Miscelleneous 538/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MALIK SAFEER AWAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4154 Cr.Acq.A. 573/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 ASHFAQUE AHMED SHAIKH S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS MUHAMMAD NAEEM S/O SHAMSUDDIN & ANR (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4155 Spl.Cr.Bail 82/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AZHAR IQBAL S/O JAVED IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4156 Criminal Miscelleneous 691/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ALLAH JURIO ARFANI (Applicant) VS THE IST ADJ THATTA (JOP) & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4157 Cr.Bail 1721/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AAMIL @ AAMIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4158 Election Appeal 108/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mustaqeem Ahmed Siddiqui Qadri (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commissioner Sindh and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4159 Election Appeal 262/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Younus Ilyas S/o Ilyas Bahadur (Appellant) VS The Provincial Election Commission Sindh & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4160 Const. P. 1135/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Tayyab Uddin S/o Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4161 Const. P. 619/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Gulshan W/o Aashiq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUL-23 Yes Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cutoff social relations with the son or daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4162 Cr.Bail 954/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ASIF S/O GHULAM MEHBOOB (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4163 Election Appeal 83/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Saeed Khan S/o Abdul Ghafoor (Appellant) VS The RO PS-97 Khi East and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4164 Election Appeal 131/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Zakaria Usman S/o Usman Abdul Latif (Appellant) VS The RO NA-241 Khi South III and ANother (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4165 Election Appeal 78/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Amjad Iqbal Afridi S/o Muhammad Iqbal Khan Afridi (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4166 Election Appeal 223/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Moin Uddin Junaidi (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commissioner Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4167 Election Appeal 168/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Aftab uddin Baqai S/o Muhammad Aminuddin (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commissioner Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4168 Cr.Bail 1673/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHID S/O URS TARO & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4169 Const. P. 4972/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P Nos. 5173, 5966 & 5626 of 2023 2023 Shamim Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-JAN-24 Yes No interim relief or provisional release can be granted by this Court when assessment has been made on Valuation Ruling under Section 25A of the Customs Act Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1407/2024 Shamim Ahmed and another v. The Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary (Revenue)/Chairman, Federal Board of Revenue, FBR House, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4170 Criminal Miscelleneous 885/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 REHMAT GUL S/O GULAB KHAN (Applicant) VS IVTH ADJ MALIR KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4171 Cr.Bail 1677/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD SALEH S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4172 Const. P. 3555/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: C.P Nos. D- 1443, D-1490 & D-1919 of 2022 2022 Lalpir Power Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4173 Const. P. 2701/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Shakoor Abro... (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-24 Yes In this context, it may be observed that the writ jurisdiction of this Court is not meant to be exercised to compel the competent authority to promote a Civil Servant against whom prima facie involvement in serious charges of misconduct was available, for the reason that any such direction would be disharmonious to the principle of good governance and canons of service discipline causing undue interference to hamper the smooth functioning of the departmental authorities. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is a well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4174 Cr.Bail 1421/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 OWAIS S/O ABDULLAH KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4175 Cr.Tran 22/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN S/O HASHIM KHAN (Appellant) VS GHULAM HUSSAIN (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4176 Cr.Bail 1568/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 IMRAN S/O RAMZAN & ANTOHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4177 Election Appeal 124/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Makhdoom Fazal Hussain Qureshi (Appellant) VS The RO NA-219 Hyderabad-II and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4178 Const. P. 966/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mst. Rashida and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4179 Cr.Bail 1623/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHABBIR MUHAMMAD S/O MUHAMMAD BAQAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-AUG-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4180 Cr.Bail 1207/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 NAIK MUHAMMAD S/O MIRA GUL KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4181 Election Appeal 122/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mrs. Rukhsana Kousar w/o Aijaz Ahmed (Appellant) VS RO NA-211 Mirpurkhas-I and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4182 Election Appeal 211/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Tabassum Fareed W/o Fareed Uddin (Appellant) VS The Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4183 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 129/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s. Muhammad Moosa Viyani & Co. (Applicant) VS The Collector of Customs, Karachi & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4184 Cr.Bail 1442/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 WAHEEDULLAH S/O GUL SHAH ALI KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4185 Election Appeal 228/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Izhar Ahmed S/o Abdul Samad (Appellant) VS RO PS-100 Khi East IV and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4186 Criminal Appeal 5/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHOAIB S/O RASHID RIZWAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4187 Cr.Bail 1185/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HASSAN SHAH S/O GHULAM MOHIUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4188 2023 SBLR Sindh 2151 Cr.Bail 1609/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASAD SHAHID SOORTY & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4189 Criminal Miscelleneous 769/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 LIAQUAT ALI S/O SHOUKAT ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS ABDUL HADI MUNIYA & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4190 Cr.Bail 2604/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ARSHAD S/O SAEED AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4191 Criminal Miscelleneous 663/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 NOOR MUHAMMAD ALI S/O SAIFAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4192 Election Appeal 21/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Haleem Adil Sheikh Thr. Attorney Ali Tahir (Appellant) VS The Returning Officer NA-238 Khi East and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4193 Election Appeal 2/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Sadiq Iftikhar Mohammad S/o Muhammad Iftikhar (Appellant) VS The Returning officer NA-234 Korangi Khi-III & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4194 Cr.Bail 1246/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AMEER BUX SUHAG (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4195 Criminal Miscelleneous 255/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AAMIR KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD WAHAB (Applicant) VS TANVEER SHERYAR & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4196 Const. P. 1151/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Kashif Ali Channa S/o Yar Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4197 Criminal Miscelleneous 364/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 JAWED IQBAL S/O FATEH MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4198 Criminal Miscelleneous 653/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 AIJAZ AHMED HASHMI (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4199 Cr.Rev 93/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 PAKISSTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (Applicant) VS DEEDAR ALI KALHORO & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4200 Const. P. 451/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sarang Latif Panhwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4201 Cr.Bail 971/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD IMRAN S/O NAWABUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes To invoke the provisions of section 364-A, it is incumbent upon the court to first see whether there was kidnapping within the meaning of section 361 PPC which envisages the co-existence of three elements contained therein namely (i) The minor was taken or enticed away by the kidnapper. (ii) The minor was out of the keeping of the lawful guardian (iii) The keeping of the minor was without the consent of the guardian. Once kidnapping is established, the question under section 364-A would be as to whether the appellant intended to murder the victim or subject her to grievous hurt or lust. 9. The words 'take' and 'entices away' used in section 361 PPC are key words to the offense of kidnapping implying some action on the part of the kidnapper to take or entice away the kidnapee followed by keeping the kidnapee out of the lawful guardianship of the guardian without his consent. The expression "taking" and "enticing" call for some positive steps taken by the accused to remove the girl from the custody of her guardian. Neither Section 361 PPC nor Section 363 PPC would have any application if the girl of her own accord the word 'kidnapping' connotes stealing away a child without the permission of a person under whose custody or care the child is'. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4202 Const. P. 805/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hoti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4203 Cr.Bail 207/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Islam (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes The charge under section 377 P.P.C. was converted to one under section 377-A punishable under section 377-B P.P.C. To facilitate reference the two sections are reproduced below: 377-A. Sexual abuse. Whoever employs, uses, forces, persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any person to engage in, or assist any other person to engage in fondling, stroking, caressing, exhibitionism, voyeurism or any obscene or sexually explicit conduct or simulation of such conduct either independently or in conjunction with other acts, with or without consent where age of person is less than eighteen years, is said to commit the offence of sexual abuse. 377-B. Punishment. Whoever commits the offence of sexual abuse shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which [shall not be less than fourteen years and may extend up to twenty years and with fine which shall not be less than one million rupees]. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4204 Const. P. 605/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Amir Niaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No Rule 10-A of the Appointment Rules, 1974 was originally introduced vide notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/2002 dated 2.9.2002 and started with a non-obstante clause thereby overriding all other provisions in the appointment rules. A perusal of the above-reproduced rule reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008.in conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died during service whereas the substituted rule included the children of the civil servant who were declared invalidated or incapacitated for further service and the post against which such category of persons could be appointed, was curtailed to BS-16-17 only instead of BS 11-20. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4205 Const. P. 1193/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Rahul (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4206 Const. P. 704/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Imran & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4207 Const. P. 492/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sajjad Raza Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4208 Const. P. 730/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Mohammad Ali Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
4209 Const. P. 594/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS DHO Mpk & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4210 Const. P. 432/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Sattar & Others (Petitioner) VS Federal Govt Through MD PASCO & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4211 Const. P. 1784/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4212 R.A (Civil Revision) 294/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Usman (Applicant) VS M. Kashif (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4213 Const. P. 4296/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nazeer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-24 Yes To apply for exhumation of the dead body under Section 176(2) of the Code a Magistrate's satisfaction that exhumation is necessary to determine the cause of death. This discretion should be exercised cautiously, even if the request comes from a stranger, as long as reasonable circumstances or suspicion exists. The purpose is to initiate criminal proceedings if necessary. Close relatives may be involved in homicides, so their objections alone should not be a barrier to disinterment if other circumstances warrant it. The case of Muhammad Ramzan and others v. The State and another (1987 SCMR 272) supports disinterment even after a year to determine the cause of death. 8. Primarily, the father has the right to know his loved one's true cause of death. As the Supreme Court upheld in Ameer Afzal Baig v. Ahsan Ullah Baig, disinterment orders based on suspicion are valid. Even after burial, the right to investigate the cause of death exists. The law allows such requests, even from strangers to ensure proper investigation and to satisfy concerns about potential foul play. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4214 Const. P. 549/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Ahad Buriro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4215 Const. P. 1318/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Syed Bachal Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
4216 Const. P. 557/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zikram Rizvi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4217 Const. P. 466/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Parvez Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4218 Const. P. 206/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Hakeema & another (Petitioner) VS POS & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-OCT-24 Yes I, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the marriage of the couple, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4219 Const. P. 421/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Hatul khatoon (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4220 Cr.Rev 52/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muhammad Mughera Malik (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 29-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4221 Const. P. 417/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Ameen Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4222 Const. P. 431/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muharram Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4223 Const. P. 505/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Wahid & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
4224 Const. P. 1135/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4225 Const. P. 373/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Sajjad Ali Jarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4226 Const. P. 63/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mushtaque Ali Siyal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4227 Const. P. 408/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Ameen Arain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4228 Const. P. 418/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Mujtaba & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4229 Const. P. 1145/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Athar Ali Malik (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4230 Const. P. 674/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Wasim Abbas Burriro (Petitioner) VS P O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4231 Const. P. 312/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Abdul Salam Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4232 Const. P. 589/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Muhammad Mari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4233 Const. P. 576/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Talib Hussain lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4234 Const. P. 1222/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Ramaiz Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4235 Const. P. 427/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zameer Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4236 R.A (Civil Revision) 39/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Zameer Hussain (Applicant) VS Abdul Khalique and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4237 Const. P. 831/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Irshad Begum Korai (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4238 Cr.Bail 779/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 JAFFAR ALI S/O DOST ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-JUL-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4239 Const. P. 1360/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Aqib Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4240 Const. P. 734/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Hassan Gopang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4241 Const. P. 627/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ameer Ali Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4242 Const. P. 1027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Aaqib Ali Shahani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4243 Const. P. 414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Younas Channa (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4244 Criminal Appeal 150/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 NOOR ALAM S/O ALTAF HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS ABDUL AZIZUR REHMAN & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUL-24 Yes Primarily, the Illegal Dispossession Act, of 2005 was introduced to curb the activities of Qabza groups/property grabbers and land mafia. During arguments, it has been conceded by respondent No.1 that no material is available with him to establish that the appellant belonged to any Qabza group or land mafia or that he had the credentials or antecedents of being property grabbers. However, he states that his official accommodation has now been handed over to him in compliance with the court order. At this stage, the appellant states that he has paid an advance amount to the private respondent No.1, Which he is avoiding returning and has managed such drama, this aspect of the case is to be looked into by the competent court of law having jurisdiction if approached by the party. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4245 Cr.Bail 1467/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Ghulam Mustafa S/o Mahboob Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes In the instant case, neither the applicant, as per contents of the FIR, referred to above, is nominated as an accused, nor a warrant has been issued against him under sections 75/87, Cr. P.C was arrested upon his statement in police custody; even after his arrest in the above case, he was not forwarded to the Magistrate for his identification parade to the effect that he was the person who robbed subject Rikshw from the place of the incident as reported by the complainant for the reason, confession before the police is not admissible in evidence under the law. So far as recovery of the subject vehicle from the custody of the applicant is concerned, firstly, the recovery of the stolen vehicle has been effected on the pointation of the applicant and its evidentiary value is yet to be determined by the learned trial court after recording evidence; mere possession of the stolen property is not sufficient to constitute an offense under Section 411 PPC rather in addition it has got to be established that the person in possession of the stolen property had dishonestly received or retained the property knowing or having the reasons to believe the same to be stolen, however, the prosecution has not applied section 411 PPC in the charge sheet rather section 412 PPC has been invoked and the ingredient whereof are yet to be determined by the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4246 Const. P. 820/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4247 Const. P. 822/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Zafar Ali Tarimizi (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4248 Const. P. 672/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sonu Rajput (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No under substituted rule 10-A, the powers of direct appointment were taken from the appointing authority, and the appointment was made subject to the qualifying of test, examination, or interview from the Sindh Public Service Commission or the appropriate Selection Board and the only concession which was extended through the substituted Rule 10-A was to give 10 additional marks in aggregate to such candidate by the PSC or appropriate selection board or committee and that too only when the candidate of such category qualifies the test, examination or interview just to enhance his/her chances of employment with a further addition that in case he/she qualifies on merits, he/she would not be given the benefit of additional 10 marks. Second time Rule 10-A was substituted vide notification dated 30.07.2011. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4249 Const. P. 485/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Niaz Hussain Bozdar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4250 R.A (Civil Revision) 225/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Kamal Din (Applicant) VS Abdul Hameed & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4251 Const. P. 630/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Irshad Khan thru LRs (Petitioner) VS Mst. Rukhsana Shazi Rajput (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4252 Const. P. 985/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mohammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4253 Cr.Bail 2053/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SAQLAIN ABBASS @ AYAN S/O NAWAB HUSSAIN SHAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-OCT-24 Yes This Court is not oblivious to the fact that unfortunately, one young lady has lost her life in the alleged accident of the present case, however, the fate of the bail application is also to be decided within the framework of Section 497 Cr.P.C. and under the guidelines on the subject laid down by the Supreme Court. Besides the above, the liability of the present applicant or charges leveled against him could only be determined by the trial Court after recording and evaluating the evidence. It is also a settled principle of law that at the bail stage deeper appreciation of the merit of the case cannot be undertaken and only a tentative assessment of the material available is to be made. The record shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict or hardened criminal. Moreover, he is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4254 Const. P. 815/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur; attached cases: C. P. No. D-1148/2023 2023 Sarfraz Ali Ujjan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
4255 Const. P. 212/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4256 Cr.Rev 12/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Sultan (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-24 No A High Court acting in the exercise of its powers of revision under section 439 (and a Court of Sessions so acting under section 439-A), may allow any person to compound any offence which he is competent to compound under subsection 5A of Section 345 of the Code Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4257 Const. P. 781/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Nazia & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-24 Yes Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4258 Const. P. 483/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Nabi Bux JIskani & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4259 Const. P. 816/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khadim Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4260 Cr.Bail 376/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Chakar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-JUL-24 No Primarily, Section 365-B P.P.C signifies the carrying away of a woman by any means with the aim that she may be compelled to marry or forced or made to illicit intercourse, against her will. The plain reading of the section indicates two main components and ingredients of the offense, firstly, there must be kidnapping or abduction of a woman, and secondly, the first act of abduction and kidnapping must be with the intent that she may be compelled to marriage or be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4261 Const. P. 548/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ameer Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4262 Const. P. 614/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Najeebullah mahesar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4263 Cr.Rev 25/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abdul Khalique Buiro (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4264 Const. P. 388/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Azizullah @ Aziz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes It appears from the record that several constitutional petitions have been filed alleging misuse of discretionary powers under the policy 2023-24 while distributing BARDANA to the growers. Initially petitioners raised their voices of concern alleging mall administration in distribution of BARDANA to some fictitious persons/traders having no agricultural land in the relevant areas to please them for extraneous consideration. It is urged by the petitioner???s side that a mafia in collusion with official respondents is active at the distribution centers. Small farmers are made to stand in lines to submit their applications, yet BARDANA is being distributed to the favorites upon political influence or to fictitious persons by manipulating records. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4265 Const. P. 82/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Waseem Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Sindh Industrial Estate (S.I.T.E) & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
4266 Const. P. 559/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Irshad Ali Morojo & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4267 Const. P. 821/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Syed Zafar Ali Tarimizi (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4268 Const. P. 825/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Shamim Rabani (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4269 Const. P. 801/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Pir Bux & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4270 Const. P. 3542/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhib Ali Unar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-24 Yes The petitioners, a married couple, were married against their parents' wishes. The wife's family filed a false police report against the husband, leading to fears of his arrest, which is illegal. The petitioners seek legal protection against potential harassment and unlawful demands. The police officers state that a final report has been submitted to the Magistrate for closure of the case. The complainant does not dispute this. The petitioner's lawyer requests that the Magistrate be directed to decide on the final report and that the police protect the petitioners regarding their marriage. The lawyer also requests that the complainant be restrained from harassing the petitioners. 7. The petition is disposed of with a direction to the investigating officer to inform the Magistrate about the Court's order to close the case. The Magistrate will then decide on the in terms of statement of the victim girl, the police must protect the petitioners and ensure they are not harassed. 8. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4271 Const. P. 146/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Gulabi Khatoon Shar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4272 Const. P. 1071/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mahboob Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 No Functions Test Applicability to Habib Bank Limited Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
4273 Cr.Rev 186/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 RASHID GHAZI S/O GHULAM QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-24 Yes The law allows joint trials/charges for offenses linked by time, place, or motive. The wisdom behind joinder of charges is to avoid conflicting decisions, minimize witness burden, and save court time by combining related offenses into a single trial. Additionally, the "same transaction" test, requiring continuity, intent, and shared design, is crucial. It is important to note that the court while trying any offense under the law as a special court may also try any other offense which an accused may, under the Cr. PC be charged, at the same trial if the offense is connected with such other offense. If in the course of any trial under the law of any scheduled offense, it is found that the accused person had committed, in addition, any other offense connected with the scheduled offense, the special court may pass the order for such other offense as authorized by the law or as the case may be such other law. To understand the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (ATA), we first examined its legislative intent as expressed in the preamble, which for convenience sake is referred to here under:- ??? whereas it is expedient to provide for the prevention of terrorism, sectarian violence and for speedy trial of heinous offenses and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4274 Const. P. 668/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Safdar Ali & Another (Petitioner) VS Secretary Food Dept & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4275 Const. P. 670/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Waheed Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4276 Const. P. 1261/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Muhammad Amir Ghunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4277 Cr.Bail 165/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Lateefuddin (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-24 No The delay per se in lodging the F.I.R. is also one of the grounds for bail in such circumstances of the case. That being so, one of the foundational elements of Section 489-F P.P.C. is prima facie missing due to peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, however, the ingredients of the same are yet to be proved before the trial Court. The invocation of penal provision would, therefore, remain a moot point. The ground that prosecution is motivated by malice may not in these circumstances be ill-founded for the reason that the complainant waited for a considerable period and lodged an FIR which factum needs a thorough probe by the trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4278 Const. P. 1217/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Naseem Fatima Simair (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4279 Const. P. 906/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Riaz Hussain Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4280 Const. P. 527/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Jam Maqbool & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4281 Const. P. 165/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Husna Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4282 Cr.Bail 1171/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Khan S/o Abdul Majeed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-24 Yes From the tentative assessment of the evidence in the hand of the prosecution, it appears that there is hearsay evidence against the present applicant/accused. Nonetheless, the truth or otherwise of charges leveled against the accused could only be determined after the trial after taking into consideration the evidence adduced by both parties. It may be observed that the offense alleged against the applicant/accused falls outside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. In such like case grant of bail is a rule and refusal is an exception. Reliance in this regard can be placed on the cases of Tariq Bashir and others v. The State [PLD 1995 SC 34] and Mohammed Tanveer v. the State [PLD 2017 Supreme Court 733]. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4283 Cr.Bail 1310/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ZULQARNAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-24 Yes The victim lady present in the Court has categorically stated that she contracted a valid marriage with the applicant out of her free will, such Nikahnama and affidavit of Free-will have been placed on record. Be that as it may, since the lady has no grievance as such this bail application needs to be disposed of based on her statement made in the Court without dilating upon the merit of the case. 6. If this is the position of the case, without touching the merits of the case, this Court is left with no option but to confirm the bail of the applicant in terms of the order dated 28.8.2023 on the statement of Mst. Kinza, however, the trial Court shall conclude the proceedings within two months. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4284 Const. P. 574/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ahmed Ali Ttunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4285 Const. P. 105/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Imam Bux Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4286 Const. P. 530/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Illahi Bux Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4287 Const. P. 1012/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Noor Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS Mst Saima begum & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-24 No It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/ Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4288 Const. P. 978/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Naeem Qudrat & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4289 Const. P. 935/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mumtaz Rajper & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4290 Const. P. 6135/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-APR-24 Yes Nomination in FIR; quashment or compromise; disentitled for fresh appointment in Police Department Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4291 Const. P. 488/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Manzoor Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4292 Const. P. 863/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Iqbal Shambani & others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4293 Const. P. 685/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Saleh (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4294 Cr.Bail 98/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Waseem @ Joni (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No Additionally, the law would require that after the arrest of the accused, who is not nominated in the FIR but is alleged to have been seen by the complainant or other witnesses, his identification parade shall be immediately held so that the chances of his exposure to the complainant and witnesses before identification parade are excluded and sanctity of the identification parade is kept reliable. however this factum is missing in the present case based on the analogy that the name of the applicant is mentioned in the F.I.R, prima-facie this not the essence of law that when the accused commits the offense and his identity has already been shown in the F.I.R just after his arrest his identification parade shall not be conducted, this is a misconceived approach for the simple reason that Article 22 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 provides mechanics to enable the witnesses to establish the identity of unacquainted assailants, a dilemma increasingly confronting prosecution in the detection of culprits in expanded urban neighborhoods. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4295 Cr.Bail 174/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Malook (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-24 No The offense charged does not fall within the prohibitory clause. There is a shake in the prosecution story, therefore, a question of further inquiry arises and further, in the light of the above circumstances, the involvement of the applicant in this case with malafide intention of the complainant also cannot be ruled out. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4296 Const. P. 93/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Sadaqat Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4297 Cr.Bail 305/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Azhar Ali Makwal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-24 Yes The Supreme Court in the recent case has held that the law of bail under Section 497 Cr. P.C, wherein it is provided that a person shall not be released on bail if there appear to be reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment of 10 years, though all the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497 Cr. P.C, however in pre-arrest bail this Court is only required to see the ulterior motives and malafide of the complainant and police and will also tentatively assess the material and can also touch the merits of the case so far as the allegations contained in the F.I.R, and statement of PWs and other material points available on the police file. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4298 Const. P. 4564/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nil (Petitioner) VS Nil (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JAN-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4299 Const. P. 953/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 A. Razzaq Dawood (Petitioner) VS V/S M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1943/2018,C.P.1368/2019,C.P.5452/2021,C.P.6388/2021,C.A.644/2022,C.A.645/2022 SCP Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
4300 Const. P. 6788/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 DR. SALMA KAUSA ALI (Petitioner) VS PROVINCE OF SINDH & OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.427-K/2017 Muhammad Ali Abbasi v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4301 Const. P. 8022/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mehmood Khalil and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4302 Const. P. 2657/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Naveed Ahmed Awan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4303 Const. P. 1847/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Yasin Ali Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS The Administrative Sect: STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4304 Const. P. 5472/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 20-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.573-K/2018 Shahid Iqbal Shaikh v. The Govt. of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4305 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4306 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 No We are of the considered view that the interest of justice would be best met if the respondents are granted last opportunity to comply with the direction of this Court in the instant matter without fail within two (02) weeks and to submit compliance report to this Court on the next date of hearing, failing which show cause notice shall be issued to alleged contemnors on the next date of hearing. To be listed on 04.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m. when alleged contemnors must be present in Court along with their compliance report. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4307 Const. P. 8533/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Toufiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4308 Const. P. 1016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pehalwan Ali (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4309 2017 SBLR Sindh 1046, 2017 SBLR Sindh 1419 Const. P. 6234/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mehr Iqbal Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.86-K/2017 Mehar Iqbal Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4310 Const. P. 5608/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Mansoor ul Haq Solangi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.859-K/2016 Pakistan Automobile Corporation Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan thr.Secy: M/o Industries and Production and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
4311 2019 PLC (CS) 1100 Const. P. 3415/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Uzma Shaheen Pirzada (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.614-K/2017 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others,C.A.9-K/2019 Dr.Uzma Shaheen Pirzada v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Early date ],Disposed Disposed of
4312 Cr.Bail 136/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 ASHRAF ASHFAQ S/O ASHFAQ AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4313 2020 PLC (CS) 1 Const. P. 571/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Mateen Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.653-K/2018 Muhammad Mateen Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4314 Const. P. 5748/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ali Nawaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sect: Health Dept. and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4315 Const. P. 6254/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Prof: Abdul Razzaque Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.655-K/2017 Prof: Abdul Razzaque Shaikh v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4316 Const. P. 5049/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Shamsher Safdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1592/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Government of Pakistan M/o Infomation, Broadcasting & National Heritage, Islamabad & another v. Muhammad Shamsher Safdar & others,C.P.2494/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary to the Govt of Pakistan, M/o Information, Islamabad & another v. Muhammad Shamsher Safdar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4317 Const. P. 527/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Syed Mohammad Ali Gohar Zaidi (Petitioner) VS HBFC and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.598-K/2018 Syed Muhammad Ali Gauhar Zaidi v. House Building Finance Corporation thr. its M.D. and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4318 2018 MLD 1649 Const. P. 196/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Nayab Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Hameeda Bano & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.460-K/2017 Nayab Ali v. Mst: Hameeda Bano and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4319 Cr.Bail 1688/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 JAVED S/O MUHAMMAD NAWAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4320 Const. P. 6708/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar & 3 others (Petitioner) VS The Federation of Pakistan and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1782/2017 Dr. Mumtaz Ali Shar and others v. The Federation of Pakistan, thr. its Secretary, M/o Petroleum and Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4321 Cr.Bail 1725/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 GHULAM ABBASS S/O MUHAMMAD SARWAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4322 Suit 614/2008 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Muhammad Amin through LRs. (Plaintiff) VS Mst. Shamim Begum alias Lala (Defendant) S.B. Judgement 13-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4323 2018 YLR 1695 Cr.Acq.A. 252/2012 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 State through Prosecutor General Sindh (Appellant) VS Waseem Faraz (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 26-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4324 Const. P. 213/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Learned District & S.J Badin & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4325 Const. P. 3657/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ehsan Ali Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4326 Const. P. 1096/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) VS Zeeshan Ali & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4327 Const. P. 1790/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Dodo and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4328 Const. P. 3036/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4329 Cr.Bail 102/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Rehman (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4330 Const. P. 561/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O. sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4331 Const. P. 513/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammasd Rashid Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.440-K/2019 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Interior and others,C.A.3044/2022 National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Syed Arshad Wahab and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
4332 Const. P. 6158/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Imtiaz Ahmed Magsi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1074-K/2018 Imtiaz Ahmed Magsi v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Local Govt. thr.Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed [C.M.As.924, 508 & 680-K/2019 are also Dismissed]
4333 Const. P. 597/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem Soomro & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4334 2018 SBLR Sindh 134 Const. P. 3199/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Bakht Siddiqui and 61 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordingly Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.409-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Bakht Siddique and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4335 Const. P. 2833/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Muhammad Waseem and 4 others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4336 Const. P. 174/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Veenjhraj (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.270-K/2019 Veenjhraj v. Province of Sindh thr.Chief Secy: Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4337 Const. P. 646/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Tariq Mehmood and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4338 Const. P. 1016/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Nadeem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4339 Const. P. 402/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Tahseen Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4340 I. A 11/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Province of Sindh through Secretary Industries, Karachi (Appellant) VS Ashrafuddin & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4341 Const. P. 3037/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Saifur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4342 Const. P. 740/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 DR. Mazhar Ali Hisbani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sind & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4343 Const. P. 5245/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Aamir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4344 Const. P. 5391/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Abid Ali and ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4345 Cr.Bail 303/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Abdul Qadir Shah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4346 Const. P. 5379/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Kamran Aziz Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4347 Const. P. 4694/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Syed Abbas Haider (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2783/2017 Oil & Gas Development Company (OGDCL) thr. its Managing Director and another v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of+contempt proceedings suspended.
4348 Const. P. 429/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Atif Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4349 Cr.Bail 8/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 MUHAMMAD ILYAS & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4350 Const. P. 4335/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-OCT-21 Yes we are of the view that this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot interfere in the findings recorded by the competent authority of respondent-PTCL vide decision dated 25.07.2017 as we do not see any illegality, infirmity or material irregularity in its decision warranting interference of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.839-K/2018 Masood Ahmed Bhutti v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.P.6501/2021 Masood Ahmad Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, M/o Information Technology and Telecommunication, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed
4351 Const. P. 730/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Syed Hashmat Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4352 Const. P. 1179/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Anwar (Petitioner) VS Fed:of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4353 Const. P. 62/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ahmed Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4354 Const. P. 808/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Arshad Ali (Petitioner) VS Mst. Bushra & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4355 Const. P. 3206/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Shaukat Saleem Akhund (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-20 Yes Applicant being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid departmental decision filed an application under Section 151 CPC (CMA No.4898/2016) for setting aside the Office Memorandum dated 08.01.2016. This Court, after hearing the parties on the listed application, vide order dated 26.01.2018, allowed the aforesaid application and declared the Office Memorandum dated 08.01.2016 being violative of the judgment dated 16.12.2015 passed by this Court--In view of forgoing discussion, the listed application is disposed of with direction to the Respondent-Pakistan Steel to calculate the service benefits of the Petitioner till his retirement and other benefits as admissible under the law and make payment of the same to the Petitioner within a period of (60) days from the date of receipt of this Order. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1070/2018 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another v. Shaukat Saleem Akhund & another,C.A.2028/2019 Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi & another v. Shaukat Saleem Akhund & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
4356 2021 PLC (CS) 295 Const. P. 404/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Ali and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.181-K/2019 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Ltd. and another v. Muhammad Ali Shah and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4357 Const. P. 842/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 M/S AM & MJ Builders Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.437-K/2019 M/s AM & MJ Builders (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Province of Sindh thr. its Secy:and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4358 Const. P. 1280/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mst. Itrat Fatima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4359 Const. P. 6057/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Rasheed Mallah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4360 2017 SBLR Sindh 1791 Const. P. 2951/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Gulzar Ali (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4361 Const. P. 5133/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Razzaque Umrani (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4362 Const. P. 4027/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Saddam Hussain Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.111-K/2019 Mohsin Mushtaq & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4363 Const. P. 1231/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faraz Akhtar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.118-K/2019 Faraz Akhtar Ali & another v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4364 Const. P. 4538/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Riaz Ahmed Bhutto and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.428-K/2017 Riaz Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4365 H.C.A 195/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Abdul Tauheed Khan (Appellant) VS The Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4366 2019 PLC (CS) 1217 Const. P. 1389/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Anwar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4367 Const. P. 948/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Imdad Hussain (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Moule-dad Jacobabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4368 Const. P. 7381/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Javd Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4369 Const. P. 440/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Muhammad Iqbal Chohan (Petitioner) VS E.D.O, (Edu) Hyderabad (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4370 Const. P. 4251/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Shushila Ramesh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4371 Const. P. 5311/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ms. Qurat ul Ain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4372 2019 PLC Lab. 19 Const. P. 7370/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/S SINDH CLUB (Petitioner) VS MUHAMMAD MISKEEN & OTHERS (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4373 Const. P. 378/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Mubarik Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) VS The Finance Director HESCO (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4374 Const. P. 2191/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Wasim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Federal Govt. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1443-K/2018 Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation Pvt Ltd v. M. Wasim Akhtar & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4375 Const. P. 6324/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Atta Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4376 Const. P. 1689/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Syed Aamir Hashmi and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4377 Const. P. 7936/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saeed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Primer Minister of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.308/2019 Saeed Ahmed v. Prime Minister of Pakistan thr. Principal Secretary, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4378 Const. P. 3889/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Waris and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.115-K/2019 Muhammad Waris and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4379 Const. P. 5660/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Waseem Abbas Baloch and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3669/2017 Adnan Razi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others,C.A.1604/2017 Adnan Razi v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
4380 Const. P. 5504/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Rehana Fayyaz and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4381 Const. P. 2773/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Khushnood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4382 Const. P. 1116/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Yaseen (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.882-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Muhammad Yaseen and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4383 Const. P. 6859/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Besham Kumar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman Sindh Public Service Commission & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4384 Const. P. 1037/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Shamrof (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4385 Cr.Appeal 194/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 S. Saeed Ul Hassan (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4386 Const. P. 423/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Anwar & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4387 Const. P. 8018/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mirza Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS Dow Univesity of Health Service & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1135-K/2018 Mirza Ghulam Sarwar v. Dow University of Health Sciences , Karachi thr. its Vice Chancellor and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4388 Const. P. 2072/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Jawed Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4389 Const. P. 3555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4307/2017,C.M.A.8212/2017,C.P.1247/2018,C.A.170/2018,C.A.171/2018,C.P.4865/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Allowed.CP be numbered & fixed in Next Week.,Disposed Dismissed(Bench=HJ(12)+HJ(16),Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
4390 2018 YLR 869 Cr.Bail 1171/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 IFTIKHAR GADAR S/O ABDUL RAZZAQ GADAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-AUG-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4391 2019 PLC (CS) 557 Const. P. 1842/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Irshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Chairman Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4392 2019 CLC 1444 Const. P. 846/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 CDR (R) Mansoob Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.336-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.25-K/2019 CDR (Retd) Mansoob Ali Khan v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted, Dismissed.Leave granting order is recalled.C.P is Dismissed.
4393 2019 PLC Lab. 115 Const. P. 615/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Rana Muhammad Rasheed (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4394 Const. P. 7177/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Dawn Impex Traders (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4395 Const. P. 464/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Bari Textile Mills (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4396 Const. P. 1309/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Multinational Exports (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4397 Const. P. 2825/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shoaibee Industries (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4398 2018 PLC Lab. 219 Const. P. 1919/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.605-K/2017 Muhammad Saleem v. The National Industrial Relations Commission and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4399 Const. P. 605/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Mian Gul (Petitioner) VS Pak: Steel Mills Corp. and ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.307-K/2017 Mian Gul v. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation (Pvt) Ltd. and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4400 Const. P. 453/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Akram Anjum Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4401 Const. P. 317/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2008 Mst. Mehar Bano (Petitioner) VS The President Executive Board Defence Officer (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1-K/2019 Mst: Mehar Bano v. The President of Executive Board of Defence Housing Authority DHA thr. DirectoR (Education) Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
4402 Const. P. 8485/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Haroon Saeed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4403 Const. P. 7375/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Qaim Ali Shahani (Petitioner) VS Chief Minister Secretariat & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1474-K/2018 Qaim Ali Shahani v. Chief Minister Secretariat thr. P.S. to C.M. Govt: of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4404 Const. P. 2076/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ayaz Hussain Abro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4405 2019 PLC Lab. 140 Const. P. 78/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Ghulam Fareed Bhatti and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-APR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.676-K/2018 M/s Oil Industries Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd. v. Ghulam Fareed Bhatti and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4406 Const. P. 3898/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sabir Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4407 Const. P. 3600/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 M. Afzal Kauser (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4408 Const. P. 426/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2017 Muhammad Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Shah Nawaz & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUN-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4409 Const. P. 4527/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Zahra Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4410 Const. P. 1276/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Specialized AUtoparts Ind. (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2976/2018 M/s Specialized Autoparts Industries Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.79-K/2019 M/s Specialized Autoparts Industries Pvt Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
4411 Const. P. 1277/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Super Compounds Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4412 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4413 2019 PLC (CS) Note 49 Const. P. 2074/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Nabi Bux Jamali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-APR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4414 Const. P. 3907/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4415 Const. P. 608/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Raheel & another (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4416 2018 PLC Lab. 117 Const. P. 5362/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd (Petitioner) VS Aurangzeb and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4308/2017 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd thr. its President, Karachi v. Aurangzeb & another,C.A.2113/2019 M/s Soneri Bank Ltd thr. its President, Karachi v. Aurangzeb & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed immediately after 3 months,Pending
4417 Cr.Misc. 228/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Hazar Ali S/o Hamadullah (Applicant) VS The State & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4418 Cr.Bail 251/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Yar Muhammad son of Jan Muhammad (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4419 Const. P. 3217/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Muhammad Osama Shafiq (Petitioner) VS PEMRA and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4420 Const. P. 2084/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khair Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4421 Const. P. 1339/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Kashif Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4422 Const. P. 2451/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahjehan Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4423 Const. P. 2981/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Muhammad Azeem Rind (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4424 Const. P. 3175/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahan Lakho & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4425 Const. P. 2317/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Punhal (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh &Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4426 Const. P. 1173/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Jabbar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4427 Const. P. 1767/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nabi Dost (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4428 Const. P. 2078/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Hamid Ali & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4429 Const. P. 2183/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4430 Const. P. 2542/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 RaheemBux & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4431 Const. P. 2708/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mujtaba Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4432 Const. P. 2922/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 GhulamRasool & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4433 Const. P. 1151/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Gul (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4434 Const. P. 3337/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 HyderBux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4435 Const. P. 1680/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nisar Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1276-K/2020 Subhan Ali v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Allotment Committee & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4436 Const. P. 2551/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Hakeem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4437 Const. P. 135/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Rafiq & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh &others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.485/2021 Khuwaid Ahmed v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted
4438 Const. P. 1638/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Latif & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4439 Const. P. 125/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Murtaza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes In the light of above facts and circumstances of the case, the instant Petition stands disposed of directing Chief Secretary to Government of Sindh to consider the case of the Petitioner for his appointment on any post against deceased quota as per his qualification on the basis of Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1974 and in accordance with the dicta laid down by Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in C. P. No. 482-K & 503-K of 2016, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4440 Const. P. 1605/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Habib ullah Khan Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4441 Const. P. 8747/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Bux and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4442 Const. P. 758/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst. Nighat Sultana (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4443 Const. P. 1910/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4444 Const. P. 2041/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arsalan and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4445 Adm.A 10/2013 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Nemo (Petitioner) VS Wana Group of Electronics Planting (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4446 Const. P. 590/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Director School ducation Mirpurkhas & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4447 Const. P. 7654/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Mirza Mansoor Baig (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4448 Const. P. 456/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.542-K/2019 Iftikhar Ahmed Siddiqui v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4449 Const. P. 958/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Municipal Committee Kotri (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4450 Const. P. 1071/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Haji Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4451 Const. P. 1727/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nadir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Executive Engineer HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4452 Const. P. 1066/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahzeb Mughal (Petitioner) VS HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4453 Const. P. 2009/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mohammad Essa Khan &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4454 Const. P. 1134/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4455 Const. P. 1906/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Ali Akbar & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4456 Const. P. 2946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Fahad Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4457 Const. P. 5514/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Saif Shujaat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4458 Const. P. 5200/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Noman (Petitioner) VS NADRA & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.520-K/2019 Noman v. National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) and others,C.A.42-K/2020 Noman v. National Database & Registration Authority (NADRA) thr. its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned for larger Bench.
4459 Const. P. 1085/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Nizakat Ali (Petitioner) VS C.E.O, HESCO, and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4460 Const. P. 3618/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4461 Const. P. 1709/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Atta Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4462 Const. P. 478/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ghulam Murtaza Soomro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4463 Const. P. 544/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nadeem and others (Petitioner) VS S.D.O HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4464 Const. P. 848/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Shahid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4465 Const. P. 3215/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Rais Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4466 Const. P. 1557/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Tail Abadgar Association (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4467 Const. P. 2085/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 AijazAli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4468 Const. P. 2193/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Islam Nabi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4469 Const. P. 2761/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Sadiq Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-JAN-20 Yes University of Karachi--candidature for the post of professor was not considered--if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law. if the remedy of appeal is available to a party under the statute, availing such statutory remedy, and without calling in question the appellate order, only seeking setting aside the original order in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 is not proper under the law Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4470 Const. P. 609/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4471 Const. P. 412/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Bahadur Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4472 Const. P. 2730/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Inam ul Haq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4473 Const. P. 505/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Bux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1240/2021 Sindh Revnue Board through its Secretary, Government of Sindh, Karachi v. M/s. GMB Rass Services (Pvt) Limited and another,C.P.L.A.372-K/2021 The Provice of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. M/s. GMB Rass Services (Pvt) Ltd. Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed
4474 Const. P. 1961/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Haji Muhammad Roshan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4475 Const. P. 2078/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Chairman HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4476 Const. P. 1724/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quota. We are not impressed by the contention of learned counsel for the Petitioners for the reason that aforesaid legal position explicitly show that there is concept of deceased quota subject to all just exception and not son quota, since petitioners have applied admittedly against son quota in police department which under the aforesaid provision cannot be done so. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4477 Const. P. 654/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Malik Hasnain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4478 Const. P. 301/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4479 Const. P. 1946/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Riaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4480 Const. P. 2581/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4481 Const. P. 2768/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nisar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4482 Const. P. 6071/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Ashar Afaq (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.525-K/2019 Muhammad Ashar Afaq v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4483 Const. P. 3690/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Chand Ram (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4484 Const. P. 308/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Rizwan Akbar Arain (Petitioner) VS Chairman NHA & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-SEP-19 Yes Contempt---that no appointment made on contract basis shall be regularized retrospectively and the contract/ad-hoc period of service cannot be counted in seniority of a Civil Servant as seniority can be reckoned from the date of regular appointment. Thus, the question of regularization from the date of contract employment is misconceived. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4485 Const. P. 2893/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4486 Const. P. 1359/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sain Dino (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4487 Const. P. 1526/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nazar Muhammad (Petitioner) VS CEO HESCO and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4488 Const. P. 721/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Umer Din Mehar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Irrigation matter Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4489 Const. P. 3143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shafi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4490 Const. P. 2926/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4491 2021 CLC 19 M.A. 31/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi (Appellant) VS Arshad (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes In the light of decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ardeshir Cowasjee vs. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) and order passed by the learned Tribunal in the matter, I am of the considered view that the official respondents are under legal obligation to comply the directives of the Honourable Supreme Court passed in the cases of removal of illegal encroachment of amenity plots / public properties from its occupants Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4146/2019 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others,C.A.228/2023 Muhammad Yameen Qureshi v. The Judge Anti Encroachment Tribunal, Hyderabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
4492 Const. P. 1511/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Jam Mitha Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-SEP-19 Yes Petitioner is seeking direction to the Respondents to issue notification of his post-retirement benefits, on the premise that he was appointed as Junior Engineer (Civil) BPS-17 in Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) ---the petitioner???s Counsel was directed to assist this Court more particularly regarding Article 187(2) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 that whether this Court can examine and or modify the Judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court or only to enforce it in accordance with the law--We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Sindh Government to pay all his perks and privileges to which he was entitled to on issuance of notification of his repatriation, inclusive of his entire pensionary benefits within [02] months and report compliance through MIT-II of this court. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4493 Const. P. 43/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Nawaz and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4494 Const. P. 2360/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Yaqboob (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4495 Const. P. 3794/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Gul Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Chief Engineer Irrigation and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4496 Const. P. 1224/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4497 Const. P. 2955/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Faisaluddin (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.556-K/2019 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.44-K/2020 Syed Faisal Uddin v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary M/o. Interior and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted/ to be fixed at Islamabad after 3 months,Pending Adjourned for larger Bench.
4498 Const. P. 6812/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Karachi Club (Petitioner) VS SLAT and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4499 Const. P. 2978/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Khalid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4500 Const. P. 660/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Imtiaz Ali Malano & another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
4501 Const. P. 116/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Lal Bux Jahejo (Petitioner) VS IInd Addl Distt Judge Hyd & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4502 Const. P. 554/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Phapo & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4503 Const. P. 6386/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Inam Hafiz Siddiqi (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4504 Const. P. 439/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Haji Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4505 Const. P. 3319/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4506 Const. P. 172/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Malik Faraz Ahmed & others (Petitioner) VS Agha Khursheed Ahmed & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3356/2020 Malik Faraz Ahmed and others v. Agha Khursheed Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
4507 Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4508 Const. P. 3392/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Asim Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1799/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman and another v. Muhammad Asim Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4509 Const. P. 2881/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4510 Const. P. 151/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sahoo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4511 Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dad Muhammad Brohi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4512 Criminal Appeal 104/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Akram (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.314/2020 Muhammad Akram v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4513 Const. P. 101/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Kazbano (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4514 Const. P. 2428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Yar Muhammad Bozdar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-20 No Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Respondent No.2 / Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh is directed to appear before this Court in person on the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned notification to the extent of the present petitioner shall remain suspended. To come up on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 am along with C.P. No.D-2387/2020. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4515 Const. P. 36/2006 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2006 Mumtaz Ali. (Petitioner) VS Secretary to the Govt Of Pakistan and Others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4516 Criminal Appeal 23/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Nazer Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4517 Const. P. 1396/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammed Nadeem S/o Nizam uddin (Petitioner) VS Muhammed Mahir and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.302-K/2021 Muhammad Nadeem v. Muhammad Mahir & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
4518 Const. P. 2195/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-20 No The petition has become infructuous, the same stands disposed of along with listed applications with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4519 Cr.Misc. 358/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Nadir Ali Khokhar (Applicant) VS SSP Larkana & 17 Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4520 Const. P. 307/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Govind Ram (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4521 2023 PLC Lab. 62 Const. P. 134/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4522 R.A (Civil Revision) 217/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) VS Haresh Kumar & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4523 Const. P. 8340/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-JAN-20 No By consent, the petition and listed application stand disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the cases of the petitioners within four (04) weeks from today. Needless to say that proper meeting of the DPC shall be held for this purpose and cases of the petitioners shall be decided strictly in accordance with law. There will no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4524 2023 PLC Lab. Note 52 Const. P. 325/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Aijaz and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4525 Const. P. 7214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-DEC-20 Yes regularization of their contingent service as computer Operator, Naib Qasid and Chowkidar in the Sindh Coal Authority (SCA) Government of Sindh---The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor fall within the ambit of Policy of the Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4526 Const. P. 3215/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdul Majid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4527 Const. P. 293/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Gulab Dewan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4528 Const. P. 467/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Khalid Hussain and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4529 Const. P. 230/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4530 Const. P. 622/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4531 Criminal Appeal 45/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Bashir Ahmed (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4532 Const. P. 806/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Javed Baig. (Petitioner) VS The Director General Military Lands and Cantonment Department and others. (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4533 Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.738-K/2022 Aziz Khan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session -- Before 3 HJJ ]
4534 Const. P. 4491/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Hidayatullah Amiri & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Pakistan Steel Mill employees matter Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4535 Const. P. 695/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Sahsmuddin (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
4536 Const. P. 3840/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS PTET and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-OCT-20 Yes The grievance of the petitioner, who is a retired employee of respondent No.2 / PTCL, is that pension has not been / is not being paid to him in accordance with law as substantial amounts have been / are being deducted therefrom illegally by the respondents on account of rent---It is well-settled that no amount on account of rent can be deducted from pension. On behalf of respondent No.2, their above named officer undertakes that the amount of Rs.476,373.00 illegally deducted from the petitioner's pension on account of rent shall be refunded to him within thirty (30) days from today. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the above undertaking and seeks disposal of the present petition in terms thereof. Regarding the amount illegally deducted by respondent No.2 from the pension of other retired employees on account of rent, further undertaking has been given by the above named officer on behalf of respondent No.2 that the entire said amount shall be refunded to all the said retired employees within three (03) months from today, and for this purpose they shall publish a public notice in leading English and Urdu newspapers having large circulation throughout Pakistan, inviting all the said retired employees to collect their refund. Respondent No.2 is directed to submit a compliance report to this Court in terms of this order through MIT-II latest by 31.01.2021---By consent, the petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs and listed application stands disposed of accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4537 Const. P. 241/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Haseena & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4538 Const. P. 1456/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Hidayatullah (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4539 Const. P. 7261/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Wazir Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4540 Const. P. 2080/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hafizullah & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.86-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Hafeezullah Mashoori & others,C.P.749-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Hafeezullah Mashoori & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
4541 Const. P. 877/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) VS NAB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-DEC-20 Yes Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.737/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. P.G. NAB, Islamabad v. Sarvech Shaikh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4542 Const. P. 3203/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Syed Naeem ul Haq and Ors (Petitioner) VS CEO, Pakistan Steel and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4543 Const. P. 685/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Muhammad Harif Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
4544 Const. P. 7252/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Naveed Ahmed Abro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1436-K/2020 Naveed Ahmed Abro v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4545 Const. P. 6183/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Hakeem (Petitioner) VS Provincial Ombudsman (Mohtasib) Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4546 Const. P. 3461/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shehzadi Erum (Petitioner) VS M.S Leprosy Hospital and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-21 Yes review application Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4547 Const. P. 3461/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Shehzadi Erum (Petitioner) VS M.S Leprosy Hospital and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4548 Const. P. 5663/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Jawad Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Sect: Ind & Production and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 Yes policy decision---Prima facie, the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme Phase-IV was/is a policy decision which has already been taken care of by the Secretary Ministry of Industries and Production, Government of Pakistan, whereby the request of PSMC was declined for delinking of the launching of Gulshan-e-Hadeed Housing Scheme from the privatization process vide letter dated 13.04.2015. Besides the subject matter in these proceedings is a policy matter and Privatization Commission has already taken back the decision vide letter dated 16.02.2015 for the launching of aforesaid Society till the privatization of PSMC which is the policy decision of respondents; and, in the given circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the policy decision under its Constitutional jurisdiction, for the reasons already given hereinabove. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4549 Const. P. 7189/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sharif Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-20 Yes Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression ???terms and conditions of service??? and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. Petitioner has impugned his frequent transfer and posting order dated 04.11.2019 issued by the respondent No.2-Agriculture Supply and Prices Department, Government of Sindh--It is a well settled law that the transfer and posting falls within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service and the petitioner cannot claim a vested right on a particular post at a particular place. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4550 Const. P. 4201/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-20 Yes The pivotal question involved in the present proceedings is whether a Civil / Government Servant who is found guilty of misconduct under The Sindh Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973, and a minor penalty was imposed upon him could be considered for promotion? ---In our view, the promotion to a post depends upon several circumstances. To qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. An employee found guilty of misconduct cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion committee takes the penalties imposed upon the employee into consideration and denies him the promotion, such denial cannot be termed as arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal or unjustified. In our view, the evaluation made by an Expert Committee should not be easily interfered with by this Court which does not have the necessary expertise to undertake the exercise that is necessary for such purpose. It is a settled proposition that the DPC, within its power to make its assessment, has to assess every proposal for promotion, on case to case basis. In cases where disciplinary case / criminal prosecution against the Civil / Government servant is not concluded even after the expiry of two years from the date of the meeting of the first DPC which kept its findings in respect of the Government servant the appointing authority may consider the desirability of giving him an ad-hoc promotion--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.405-K/2021 Shamsuddin Dal v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4551 Const. P. 301/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Prof. Dr. Khawar Saeed Jamali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4552 Const. P. 8536/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Riffat John (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-20 Yes Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Petitioner has approached this Court for regularization of her service as Staff Nurse (BPS-16) in Health Department, Government of Sindh--In our view, the Sindh Government may have the right to appoint bona fide residents of Province of Sindh, denial of such right to residents of other provinces is protected as discussed in the preceding paragraph. It is also established principle in service jurisprudence that the domicile declared by a Government servant and accepted by Government at the time of entry into Government service is treated as final throughout his service career and no subsequent change in his domicile is recognized for service purposes. However, if a person lives in a particular province or district and decides to shift to another province to be a permanent residence there, then it will not affect the status of his/her domicile; however, his/her former PRC will be cancelled. But in the present case we have seen that petitioner deliberately obtained domicile of District East, Karachi, after an objection was raised by the respondents with regard to her domicile of Punjab. This being the position of the case, this petition merits no consideration, which is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.294-K/2020 Riffat John v. Province of Sindh & others,C.A.976/2020 Riffat John v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.,Pending Adjourned
4553 Const. P. 5203/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Khalid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.93-K/2021 Muhammad Khalid v. Federation of Pakistan & others,C.A.18-K/2022 Muhammad Khalid v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
4554 Const. P. 1631/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sayed Zulfiqar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4555 Const. P. 5648/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Musarat Nazeer (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4556 Cr.Rev 36/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst. Zuhra Khatoon (Applicant) VS The State & 8 Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4557 Const. P. 1132/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Saeeduddin Ansari (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4558 Criminal Appeal 103/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faheem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.315/2020 Faheem v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4559 Const. P. 869/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nadir Ali (Petitioner) VS M.D STEVTA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-20 Yes Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4560 Const. P. 558/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Meer Hazar Khan Chandio & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed(Author)
4561 Const. P. 4802/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mansoor Ahmed Rajput and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes Promotion to the post of Director Information BS-19, which has been deferred vide notification dated 29.9.2020 on account of pendency of NAB reference / proceedings--whether a Civil Servant can be promoted against whom prima facie involvement in the serious charges of misconduct was available in the shape of NAB reference / proceedings ? --we are of the view that the case of the petitioners for promotion was rightly deferred by the competent authority / Board, and such decision does not call for any interference by this Court. However, their deferment shall be subject to the final outcome of the NAB reference / proceedings presently pending against them. disposed of Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.786-K/2020 Mansoor Ahmed Rajput & another v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4562 Const. P. 2666/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Saeed Habib (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-DEC-20 Yes NBP--We are constrained to observe that despite the legal position established in view of plethora of pronouncements by the Honble Supreme Court as discussed above, the present petitioner filed this petition seeking a relief to which he was not entitled under the law. In other words, the petitioner wanted this Court to grant a declaration contrary to the law settled by the Honble Supreme Court. Not only this, he obtained an ad-interim injunction order in these proceedings against the respondent-bank. Such conduct on his part is not acceptable as he has consumed and wasted valuable time of this Court which could have been utilized to decide genuine and urgent matters. Therefore, the petition is liable to be dismissed with costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.305/2021 Saeed Habib v. National Bank of Pakistan, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4563 Const. P. 914/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4564 Const. P. 5503/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Ahad Shaikh and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.793-K/2022 Abdul Ahad Shaikh & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4565 Const. P. 3265/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Jan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4566 Const. P. 4340/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Whaeed ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4567 Const. P. 8363/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Shafiq (Petitioner) VS EOBI & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-FEB-21 No EOBI Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4568 Const. P. 668/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Qaim Din Mahar & Others (Petitioner) VS Ghous Bux Shaikh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-20 No The encroachment of amenity plot cannot be allowed to sustain under the law, which aspect, the official respondents have to look into and restore its position in accordance with law. The encroachment of an amenity plot to another use is treated as an abuse of discretion and therefore is unlawful for the simple reason that the paramount object of modern city planning is to ensure maximum comforts for the residents of the city by providing maximum facilities and that a public functionary entrusted with the work to achieve the above object cannot act in a manner, which may defeat the above objective and deviation from the planned scheme will naturally result in discomfort and inconvenience to others. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed C.P.772-K/2020 Sahib Dino v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4569 Const. P. 544/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Shahid Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4570 Const. P. 5978/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mustafa Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-21 Yes out of turn promotion Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4571 Const. P. 8779/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Mumtaz Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.83-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Syed Mukhtiar Hussain & others,C.P.746-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Syed Mukhtiar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
4572 Const. P. 2021/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Haneef (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4573 2022 PLD Sindh 308 Const. P. 275/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Bakaullah Khan Samoo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4574 Const. P. 8056/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saddam Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.82-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others,C.P.745-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
4575 Const. P. 111/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Farzana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1629/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau thr. Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Rahim Bux and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4576 Const. P. 529/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Omer Shah (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4577 Cr.Acq.A. 37/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ramdas (Appellant) VS Sht. Aneeta & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4578 Const. P. 438/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Liaquat Ali (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4579 Const. P. 5571/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Majeedullah Khan (Petitioner) VS KW & SB and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-20 Yes correctio in date of birth Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4580 Const. P. 7550/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Majeed (Petitioner) VS The Overseas Employment Corp & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-21 Yes reinstatement of service as Driver in Overseas Employment Corporation--In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, the instant Constitution Petition is allowed, both the impugned orders passed by the learned National Industrial Commission are set aside, consequently, termination order dated 26.7.2012 passed by the respondent-corporation is also set aside. Resultantly, the petitioner is directed to be reinstated in service forthwith along with back benefits as Driver in the respondent-Overseas Employment Corporation. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.478-K/2021 Managing Director Overseas Employment Corporation & another v. Mir Abdul Majeed Dhillo Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4581 I. A 14/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mst. Saeeda Bano (Appellant) VS Allied Bank limitd & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4582 Const. P. 2414/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 TYMS Education Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4583 Const. P. 2947/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4584 Const. P. 2590/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bakhtiar Ahmed Sheikh & Another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4585 Const. P. 5334/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zubair Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Local Govt. Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-DEC-20 Yes It is well-settled that in absence of codal formalities i.e. advertisement, the constitution of Selection Committee, test and interview, before filling up the subject post, this Court cannot come to rescue and entertain the grievance of the petitioner as made by him in the prayer clauses under the constitutional jurisdiction. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4586 Const. P. 532/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saeed Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4587 Const. P. 302/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Iqbal Ahmed Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4588 Const. P. 372/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Majdan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4589 Const. P. 618/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Kamran (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Aslam & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1292-K/2020 Muhammad Aslam v. Muhammad Kamran & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
4590 Const. P. 444/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Mehbob Ali (Petitioner) VS D.C. Sanghar & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Prima-facie the subject land is reserved for Musafir khana which is for the people of area, legal title may vest in the Government, but such title, and the exercise of powers based thereon, is to be exercised in public interest, in accordance with the Constitution and the laws framed thereunder. Similarly, in the case reported as Ardeshir Cowasjee and 10 others v. Karachi Building Control Authority (KMC), Karachi and 4 others (1999 SCMR 2883) in somewhat similar facts in respect of a plot which was carved out within a park area, the Honble Supreme Court has held that an amenity plot cannot be used for any commercial purpose. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4591 Const. P. 127/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Nabi (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4592 Const. P. 6100/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4593 Const. P. 164/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Samia Gulzar & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4594 Const. P. 181/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Salma Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1136/2021 Magna Processing Industries Pvt Ltd Faisalabad v. Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another,C.P.4842/2021 Magna Processing Industries Pvt Ltd Faisalabad v. Province of Sindh through the SecretaryExcise and Taxation Sindh Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next hearing: After 2 weeks),Disposed Allowed, Leave Granted and Impugned Judgment suspended.
4595 Const. P. 534/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mehmood Akhtar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4596 Const. P. 7520/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Sect: Local Board and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-20 Yes The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. The instant constitutional petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, has been filed by the petitioner, seeking declaration to the effect that two additional assignments / charges of the post of Secretary, Union Council, Naseer Khan Chang and Union Council, Nango Shah, given to the private respondent No.3 in addition to his own duty as Secretary, Union Council, Saeed Khan Lund, Tando Muhammad Khan, vide impugned orders issued by the Director, local Government, Hyderabad, is illegal on the premise that the private respondent No.3 does not qualify to hold two offices in addition to his own duties--Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid statement of the Director, Local Government Board, Government of Sindh, and seeks disposal of this petition accordingly. Be that as it may, official respondents 1 and 2 are warned to be careful in future and are directed to conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law. Let a copy of this order be communicated to Chief Secretary Sindh for information. --Disposed of. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4597 Const. P. 3748/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4598 2023 SBLR Sindh 1992 Const. P. 1318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wasim Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-20 Yes the petitioner is seeking regularization of his service under section 3 of the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 in Malir Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as MDA)--Since the issue involved in this petition is akin as decided by this Court in C.P. No. D-6632 of 2019 and another connected petition vide common order dated 16.10.2020, therefore, this petition is not maintainable under Article 199 of the Constitution is disposed of in terms of the common order dated 16.10.2020, leaving the petitioner to avail and exhaust his remedy if any, as provided under the law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4599 Const. P. 983/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 979,993,998/2020 2020 Kewal Ram (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3634/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Kewal Ram and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4600 Const. P. 993/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 979,983,998/2020 2020 Kamla (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3635/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Kamla & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4601 Const. P. 5975/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imtiaz Ali Sangrasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Culture, Tourism and Antiquities Department, Government of Sindh--Admittedly, the petitioners were appointed to the aforesaid posts on contract basis in the projects after the cut-off date i.e. 25th March, 2013 as provided in the Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013--It is well-settled law that the regularization of the service is always subject to availability of budgetary post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, which factor is lacking in the present cases--Dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.382-K/2020 Imtiaz Ali Sangarasi v. The Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4602 2022 PLD Sindh 20 Const. P. 847/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Khalid Ali Dars & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4603 Cr.Misc. 145/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Farzana (Applicant) VS SSP District Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4604 Criminal Appeal 290/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Saddam Hussain @ Shabbir (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4605 Const. P. 5481/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4606 Const. P. 7530/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Mir Nusrat Ali Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4607 Criminal Appeal 46/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Aijaz Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.147-K/2020 Aijaz Ali Rajpar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4608 Const. P. 5124/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Farkhunda Yasmeen (Petitioner) VS Secretary, M/o Interior & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes It is well-settled law that the service of temporary employees can be terminated on 14 days??? notice or pay in lieu thereof, whereas in the present case petitioner claims revival of the contract through reinstatement in service, which factum cannot be thrashed out in writ jurisdiction. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4609 Const. P. 2328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Tanveer (Petitioner) VS M/s Pakistan Steel Mills Corp Ltd and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4610 Const. P. 7625/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mukhtiar Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.802/2021 Mukhtiar Ahmed and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4611 Const. P. 5135/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Hussain Ahmed Qadri (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4612 Const. P. 5275/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Lucky Textile Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4613 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 560/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4614 Const. P. 7997/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 Yes Regional Manager Askari Guards (Pvt.) Ltd--NIRC--back benefits -- Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2931/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.472/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
4615 Const. P. 1314/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Jabbar and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4616 Const. P. 3735/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Malik Abid Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-21 Yes Contempt proceedings--CAA Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4617 Const. P. 887/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hassan Zada & Ors (Petitioner) VS FOP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 Yes that their contingent/contractual/ work-charge appointments/services be regularized in respondent- Directorate of Training and Research (Customs, Excise & Sales Tax) Karachi without discrimination, with a further assertion, that they have already served in respondent- Directorate for a considerable period; and, they have the legitimate expectation for appointment on regular basis. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4119/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others,C.A.1564/2021 Directorate General of Training & Research (Customs), Karachi and another v. Hassan Zada and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Disposed of
4618 Const. P. 7006/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Ashraf Product (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4619 Const. P. 1472/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arbab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4620 Const. P. 6449/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Iftikhar Hussain Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4621 Const. P. 5072/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Choudhry Jawed & Bros (Lessee) & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4622 Const. P. 3623/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Javed Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Air Marshal Arshad Malik and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 Yes the Petitioner seeks direction to the management of Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), to provide medicine to him and his family, either from PIA's Medical Store as per prescription prescribed by the specialist Doctors without any interruption. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.5882/2021 Pakistan International Airlines through Chief Executive PIA, Karachi v. Javed Iqbal and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4623 Const. P. 4535/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Jamil Khan (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2745/2022 Muhammad Jamil Khan v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4624 Const. P. 2307/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s AIM Textile (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4625 Const. P. 7875/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Waseem Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4626 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 563/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4627 Const. P. 3323/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ayub Fazlani (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4628 Const. P. 5616/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Aftab (Petitioner) VS Div: Supr: Pakistan Railways & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes medical issue in appointment Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1049-K/2022 Muhammad Aftab v. The Divisional Superintendent Pakistan Railway, Karachi Division & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4629 Const. P. 7130/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Inayatullah Gabol (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.808-K/2021 Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Science & Technology, Islamabad & others v. Inayatullah Gabool Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4630 Const. P. 2124/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Star Denim Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-21 Yes petitioner-M/s. Star Denim Pvt. Ltd. is asking for setting aside of the impugned letter dated 10.03.2021, whereby Audit Officers of the Sindh Employees Social Security Institution (`SESSI`) attempted to visit the establishment of the petitioner to verify the Secured Workers engaged by for issuing the R-5 cards so they could get the financial / Medical care facility-- Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4631 Const. P. 2207/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hafeez ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAR-21 Yes suspension from the service--SBCA--we are of the considered view that the Petitioner has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the disciplinary proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4632 Const. P. 9016/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khurram Rauf Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.752-K/2021 Khurram Rauf Khan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.A.36-K/2021 Khurram Rauf Khan v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ]
4633 Const. P. 4107/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Aqeel Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.747-K/2021 Syed Masoom Ali Shah & another v. Province of Sindh & others,C.A.38-K/2021 Ms.Saba Wakeel v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.A.31-K/2021 Syed Masoom Ali Shah & another v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ]
4634 Const. P. 4896/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muzaffar Hussain Katpar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-21 Yes suspension order Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4635 Const. P. 5829/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Denim Clothing Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4636 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 573/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4637 Const. P. 5827/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ali Chachar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4638 Const. P. 1661/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Noor Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes WAPDA--Sindh Government--absorption--repatriation--since, he has been reported to have retired from service, during litigation; and, he has not joined WAPDA. Besides the notification of his repatriation has not been given effect. We may also notice that judgment of the Honorable Supreme Court does not apply to the retired employees as on retirement; as they do not affect the seniority, promotion, or any other benefit of the serving employees. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4639 Const. P. 2798/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Shaheen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4640 Const. P. 5659/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Sajjad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-20 Yes Petitioners questioned their transfer and posting orders issued by the respondent-Cantonment Board by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court asserting that the post against which the petitioners were appointed was/is a non-transferable under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule 5 of the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.283-K/2020 Muhammad Sajjad v. Federation of Pakistan,C.P.1324-K/2022 Muhammad Javed & others v. The Federation of Pakistan through & Secretary, Petroleum & Natural Resources, Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed
4641 Const. P. 3429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Allah Warayo and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1388/2021,C.P.5131/2021,C.P.1070-K/2022,C.P.3919/2022,C.A.4014/2022,C.A.3983/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
4642 Const. P. 6526/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Aftab Mahmood and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1398/2021,C.P.5141/2021,C.P.1174-K/2022,C.P.3993/2022,C.A.4019/2022,C.A.4000/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
4643 Const. P. 5472/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Arif (Petitioner) VS Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4644 Const. P. 4434/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Manzoor Shah (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4645 Const. P. 4434/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Manzoor Shah (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4646 Const. P. 2625/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shell Pakistan Employees Union (Petitioner) VS NIRC & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4647 Const. P. 6243/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mehtab Ahmed Siddiqui and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 Yes The Competent Authority of HBFCL is directed to forthwith initiate the process for selection of an eligible person to be appointed against the aforesaid public office / posts in HBFC, inter alia, having regard to the principles and law laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in the aforesaid cases Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4648 Const. P. 1215/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bansi Lal Malhi & Another (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-21 Yes the common grievance of the Petitioners is against the issuance of notifications dated 09.12.2019 and 26.2.2021 by the respondent-Establishment Division, whereby the direction was given to the Police Service of Pakistan Officers (PSPO), who were not pleaded as parties to the Petition bearing No D-1555 of 2021, serving in the Province of Sindh to report to the Establishment Division, basically they were also posted outside the Sindh Province----We may hold that Section 10 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, and Rule 10 of the Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules 1985, provide transfer and posting of the civil servants/PSP officers to different Provinces and the competent authority can withdraw any such officer of Federal government before the expiry of their tenure limitation, additionally, Rotation Policy cannot restrict the process of the competent authority from withdrawing any civil servant/PSP officer from the Provincial governments at any time on administrative grounds/ valid reasons. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1674-K/2021 Bansi Lal Malhi & another v. The Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4649 Const. P. 1706/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Imtiaz Habib and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-21 No six complaints were preferred before the Ombudsman, challenging the recruitment in STEVTA Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4650 Const. P. 2795/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shahana Bano (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-21 Yes the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to upgrade/re-designate the post of Senior Librarian BPS-18 to BPS-19 in Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), in terms of the policy decision of the Government of Sindh. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4651 Const. P. 1576/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Umer Khoso & Ors (Petitioner) VS Secretary Education Colleges & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4652 2022 SBLR Sindh 371 Const. P. 6167/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Al - Ghazi Traders Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 Yes whether the Sindh Human Rights Commission was/is empowered under Section 4 of the Sindh Protection of Human Rights Act, 2011, (Act, 2011) to entertain service-related issues and direct the reinstatement of the private respondents. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4653 Const. P. 5420/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wahid Bux Bhutto and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1395/2021,C.P.5138/2021,C.P.1102-K/2022,C.P.3921/2022,C.A.3996/2022,C.A.4016/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
4654 Const. P. 1335/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mansoor Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-21 No prayed for referring the matter to the Honble Chief Justice for formation of Larger Bench in terms of the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Multiline Associates v. Ardeshir Cowasjee and 2 others (PLD 1995 SC 423) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5055/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd thr. its M.D. Karachi v. Mansoor Ahmad and another,C.A.1483/2021 House Building Finance Company Ltd thr. its M.D. Karachi v. Mansoor Ahmad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months.also status quo,Disposed Disposed of
4655 Const. P. 5115/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Izhar ul Haq Junejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4656 Const. P. 2628/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Ejaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4657 Const. P. 852/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Naeem Sadiq and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAR-21 Yes CBC janitorial staff-- minimum wage Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4658 Const. P. 2001/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mirza Anwer Mehmood Baig (Petitioner) VS DG C.A.A and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-21 Yes the petitioner has sought suspension of the operation of Show Cause Notice dated 25.2.2021 issued by the respondent-Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) on the accusation of production of a copy of the mark sheet No.00575 of BA (Pass) 1st and 2nd Year Examination of 1987, which was later on found fake, which amounts misconduct as provided under Civil Aviation Authority (Efficiency and Discipline) Regulations, 2014. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4659 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 549/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4660 Const. P. 5777/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Shaista Parveen (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.583-K/2021 Dr.Erum Zahir v. Dr.Shaista Perveen & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
4661 Const. P. 2728/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Bashiran Inayat Masih (Petitioner) VS Administrator DMC Korangi and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4662 Const. P. 2463/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khalid Abdul Maroof & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4663 Const. P. 2463/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khalid Abdul Maroof & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-AUG-21 No At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that those judgments/orders may not be applicable to the petitioner. He has emphasized over the decision reported as 1985 SCMR 1158. Be that as it may, we refer the matter to the authorities, who shall examine all the relevant laws as well as guideline provided by the apex court and this court in various dicta and consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with law within eight weeks in upcoming DPC. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4664 Const. P. 5259/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Artistic Fabric & Garments Ind (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4665 Const. P. 195/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Riaz Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS M/s SSGC and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-21 Yes Needless to add that this is because of which normally every service law or rules includes such right for competent authority. Here bundle of documents have been filed which, prima facie, requires determination of factual controversy; as well petitioner is ready to contest the enquiry and further action if any taken by the respondents. Accordingly, without commenting or adjudicating the merits of the case, we are of the view that instant petition against show cause notice is not maintainable hence is dismissed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4666 Cr.Bail 184/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Bhano Khan Hattar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4667 Const. P. 1863/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Bashir & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1385/2021,C.P.5128/2021,C.P.1173-K/2022,C.P.1175-K/2022,C.P.1203-K/2022,C.P.3994/2022,C.A.3999/2022,C.A.4002/2022,C.A.4020/2022,C.A.4001/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
4668 Cr.Bail 205/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Nisar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-AUG-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4669 Const. P. 1366/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naeem Faisal Saleem & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1073-K/2022,C.A.4005/2022,C.A.3985/2022,C.A.4006/2022 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed ,Disposed
4670 Const. P. 2388/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Arifa Khatoon (Petitioner) VS The Governor of Sindh / Chancellor & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4671 Cr.Bail 24/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ali Hassan Jeho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4672 Const. P. 4468/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Afaq Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-AUG-21 No Prima facie, it is not a matter of dispute that detailed order was passed by this Court in CP No.D-4666/2013 vide judgment dated 23.10.2018 therefore, the authority was required to pass the order strictly keeping in view those detail (s) / guidelines which do not reflect from said order. The position, being so, is sufficient to say that we are not impressed by the plea taken by the AAG Sindh. Accordingly impugned order is set aside; the Chief Secretary Sindh shall pass fresh order within the light of judgment dated 23.10.2018 passed by this court in CP No.D-4666/2013. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4673 Const. P. 5860/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Nasir Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4674 Const. P. 3421/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ashique Hussain (Petitioner) VS Industrial Development Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4675 Const. P. 4739/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Zakir Hussain Khaskheli (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-AUG-21 No Besides, matter pertains to conflict of interest and counsel legally cannot sue his client with the information provided by the department or any illegality (not crime) is seen by the counsel during the period he was in employment having access to record, as is assured by Article-9 of Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Needless to add that such obligation continues even after an end to such employment, therefore, this matter pertains to conflict of interest. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1495-K/2021 Zakir Hussain Khaskheli v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secetory & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
4676 Const. P. 824/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abida Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4677 Const. P. 4450/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mehtab Singh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4678 Const. P. 1297/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst. Nadia (Petitioner) VS The I.G of Police and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes under section 22-A & 22-B Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4679 Const. P. 5281/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayaz Ahmed and Othes (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-SEP-21 Yes relieving letters of employer (SSGC Limited/respondents No.2 and 3) is against the spirit of the judgment and that paragraph 61 of the judgment cannot be treated as against the petitioners, hence SSGC has taken wrong decision in interpretation of that judgment--It is settled principle of law that promulgation of Ordinances are passed only when the assembly is not in session. The Ordinances are meant to deal with a situation of emergency required to be endorsed by the Assembly--Without prejudice to the above, it may safely be added that interpretation may be done of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court but such course would not be available when the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is being challenged while referring to interpretation thereof by this Court. If such view is allowed to hold the field, the same shall open the rooms for making a challenge to consequences of judgment(s) of Honourable Apex Court which, we would insist, may prejudice the binding effect thereof, as insisted by Article 189 of the Constitution. In the instant matter, the authority claims to have passed the order in compliance of the judgment of Honourable Apex Court. The legal position, being so, leave us with no other option but to add that appropriate remedy to challenge the consequence of judgment of Honourable Apex Court is only by approaching the Apex Court. The instant petition, being incompetent, is dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.5610/2021 Ayaz Ahmed Mahar and others v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources, Govt. of Pakistan, Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Next Date: 09-Dec-21) at 11:30 a.m.
4680 Cr.Bail 271/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Muhammad Ali Solangi (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4681 Const. P. 7753/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mushtaque Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4682 Const. P. 4496/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-SEP-21 Yes With regard to length of service, counsel for the EOBI contends that the petitioner remained employee of the respondent for a period of four years, therefore, he is not entitled for any benefit. Needless to mention that decision/termination was challenged by the petitioner in referred grievance application which was allowed, hence, it cannot be said that length of service of the petitioner was only four years. That service would be treated as upto the age of superannuation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4683 Const. P. 3943/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Saddam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 No Contentions raised by learned counsel merit consideration, particularly when similar order has been passed in C.P No.D-6378/2020, which order to apply mutatis mutandis in the present petition. Issue notice to the respondents as well as DAG. Office is directed to tag the instant petition along with the said petition and both of these petitions are directed to come up together on the next date. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1068-K/2022 Saddam Hussain & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Federal Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources, Government of Pakistan Islamabad & others,C.A.3981/2022 Saddam Hussain & others v. Federation of Pakistan through its Federal Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources, Government of Pakistan Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
4684 Const. P. 5999/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1396/2021,C.P.5139/2021,C.P.1104-K/2022,C.P.3918/2022,C.A.4013/2022,C.A.3998/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed ,Disposed
4685 Const. P. 3683/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Prof: Dr. Rana Hadi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.A.2-K/2023 Wajeehuddin Ahmed & others v. Prof. Dr. Rana Hadi & others,C.P.L.A.1365-K/2023 Wajeehuddin Ahmed & others v. Prof. Dr. Rana Hadi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed of (Number cancelled & be treated as Civil Petition),Pending
4686 Const. P. 3683/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Prof: Dr. Rana Hadi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-AUG-21 No We expect that university shall treat the professors with the due respect as well as the professors are expected that they will perform their duties with diligence within their code of conduct. Accordingly, petition No. D-3683 of 2016 stands disposed of in view of undertaking, made by learned counsel for respondents. . Accordingly, petition No. D-3683 of 2016 stands disposed of in view of undertaking, made by learned counsel for respondents.With regard to promotions, if any, petitioners shall be heard by the respondents and in case any application/presentation is preferred that shall be decided within one month. CP.No.D-494 of 2017 is also disposed of in terms as mentioned above Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.A.2-K/2023 Wajeehuddin Ahmed & others v. Prof. Dr. Rana Hadi & others,C.P.L.A.1365-K/2023 Wajeehuddin Ahmed & others v. Prof. Dr. Rana Hadi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed of (Number cancelled & be treated as Civil Petition),Pending
4687 Const. P. 3668/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dadan Khan Pirzado and Others (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Education and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-21 Yes Prima facie, the impugned order dated 04.8.2020 does not disclose the justiciable reasons for recalling the promotion of the petitioners, however, the respondents have reservations against such promotion of the petitioners which primarily needs to be looked into by the competent authority under the relevant law and this Court, at this juncture, is not a position to thresh out such allegations and counter-allegations so raised by the parties hereinabove under writ jurisdiction. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4688 Const. P. 4172/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sami Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4689 Const. P. 532/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Arif & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.104/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Nadeem Arif and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4690 Const. P. 640/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Gulji & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4691 Cr.Acq.A. 240/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 HUZOOR BUX (Appellant) VS PIR SIDDIUE SAJJAD GHOUS SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4692 Const. P. 1548/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Sajida &anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4693 Const. P. 262/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4694 Const. P. 1550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Jalauddin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4695 Cr.Bail 626/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Hizbullah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4696 Const. P. 699/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Iqbal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4697 Const. P. 704/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rafeeque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4698 Const. P. 737/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Khaliq (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4699 Cr.Bail 903/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 AMEERUDDIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4700 Cr.Tran 61/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 HAJI MIR HASSAN KHAN BHURGARI (Appellant) VS MUKHTIAR AHMED @ GUDO & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.155-K/2021 Haji Mir Massan Khan Bhurgari v. Mukhtiar Ahmed @ Gudo & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
4701 Const. P. 133/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Parwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4702 2023 SBLR Sindh 1604 Const. P. 2358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: CP No. D- 2358 & 2622 of 2019 2019 Faisal Shah Muhammad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4703 Cr.Bail 1899/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4704 II.A. 3/2014 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Abdul Samad Soomro (Appellant) VS Mst Nazir Bano and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.157-K/2022 Abdul Samad v. Mst.Nazir Bano & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4705 Civil Revision 199/1999 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1999 Professor Muhammad Rahim & Others (Applicant) VS Municipal Committee Mirpurkhas (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4706 Cr.Bail 510/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Rehman and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4707 Civil Revision 35/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Shamdas and others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Hassan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4708 Const. P. 716/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Syed Atif Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4709 Const. P. 738/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mukhtar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4710 Const. P. 758/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Naseem Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4711 Const. P. 182/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P.No.D-198 of 2021 [Qurban & another Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-435 of 2021 [Khalil Ahmed & anothervs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-479 of 2021 [Mushtaque Ali & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-509 of 2021 [Noorullah Dehraj vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-534 of 2021 [Nazar Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P. No.D-668 of 2021 [Gul Mir vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-769 of 2021 [Mst. Razia & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-845 of 2021 [Abdul Majeed vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-914 of 2021 [Pir Bux & others vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1027 of 2021 [Ali Ahmed & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1070 of 2021 [Ayaz Ali & others vs. SHO PS Punhan Khan Chandio & another] C.P No.D-1198 of 2021 [Ali Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1277 of 2021 [Mukhtiar Ali & another vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1543 of 2021 [Behram Khan vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] C.P No.D-1556 of 2021 [Khurram Ali vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] -:2:- C.P No.D-182/2021 a/w connected petitions C.P No.D-1689 of 2021 [Muhammad Waris @ Suneel vs. Province of Sindh & Ors] 2021 Mevo Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4712 I. A 1/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Intra Court Appeal No.01 of 2019 [Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited versus Saleem Ahmed Memon] 2019 Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Saleem Ahmed Memon (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4713 Civil Revision 114/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Ismail & Ors (Applicant) VS Haji Ramzan (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4714 Cr.Bail 879/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SHAFIQUE AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Bail After Arrest Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4715 Const. P. 708/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mir Asad Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4716 Const. P. 747/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Moti Ram (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4717 Const. P. 1313/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nil (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4718 Const. P. 1442/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muzaffar Hussain and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
4719 Const. P. 1689/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Waris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4720 Const. P. 534/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Nazar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4721 Civil Revision 173/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ahmed Khan & Others (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ismail & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4722 Cr.Bail 1917/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHZAD MASTOI S/O MUHAMAD RIAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-21 Yes seeking admission on post-arrest bail in FIR No.361/2021 for offenses under Section 324/34 PPC registered at PS Sukhan, Karachi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4723 Const. P. 837/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mir Munawar Ali Talpur (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4724 Const. P. 1195/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Younus and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4725 Const. P. 2665/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Majid Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4726 Const. P. 713/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Tasneem Safdar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4727 Const. P. 714/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Afser Sultana Chandio (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4728 Const. P. 725/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Tariq Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4729 Const. P. 763/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mir Asad Abbas Ali (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4730 Const. P. 2411/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Latif (Petitioner) VS Vth Addl. District Judge, Hyderabad (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4731 R.A (Civil Revision) 45/2008 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2008 Nil (Applicant) VS Nil (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4732 Cr.Bail 1317/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 INTEKHAB ALAM QURESHI S/O MUHAMMAD YOUNUS QURESHI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 Yes seeking pre-arrest bail in F.I.R No. 432 of 2021, for an offense under section 489-F P.P.C at Liaquatabad Police Station, Karachi Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4733 Const. P. 632/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.918-K/2022 Faheem Ahmed v. Province of Sindh Chief Minister, through Principal Secretary to Chief Minister Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4734 Const. P. 356/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Sharafat Ali (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
4735 Const. P. 292/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4736 Const. P. 948/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mir Fateh Ali Khan Talpur (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4737 Const. P. 171/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Yousuf Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4738 Const. P. 5067/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Akram Memon (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Civil Aviation Athority & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4739 Const. P. 1016/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Hafeez (Petitioner) VS G.O.S & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.772-K/2022 Abdul Hafeez v. Government of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Disposed of
4740 Const. P. 1611/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Agha Fahad Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4741 Const. P. 7329/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Freeway Heights (Petitioner) VS P.C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4742 Const. P. 1010/2007 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2007 Muhammas Aslam (Petitioner) VS P.I.A.C. & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4743 Const. P. 1254/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Sunita Deri (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-FEB-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4744 M.A. 35/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Ameer Hassan & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4745 Const. P. 1335/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4746 Const. P. 2797/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Recorder Television Network (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1718/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. M/s Recorder Television Network (Pvt). Ltd & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4747 Const. P. 152/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ayaz Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4748 Const. P. 184/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ghulam Qadir Thebo (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-22 Yes In our view, to qualify for the promotion, the least that is expected of an employee is to have an unblemished record. This is the minimum expectation to ensure a clean and efficient administration and to protect the public interest. An employee found not fit for promotion cannot be placed at par with the other employees, and his / her case has to be treated differently. While considering an employee for promotion his / her entire service record has to be taken into consideration and if a promotion denies him / her promotion, such denial would not be illegal or unjustified under the service jurisprudence. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.550-K/2022 Ghulam Qadir Thebo v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan through Secretary, Establisment Division, Government of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4749 2022 PLC CS 1378 Const. P. 3031/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Akber Siyal & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4750 M.A. 33/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS M. Rahim & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4751 Const. P. 3313/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 ARY Communication Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1721/2022 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad & another v. ARY Communications Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4752 Const. P. 3804/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Dr. Abdul Karim Channa (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-22 Yes 7. The question involved in the present proceedings is whether Temporary and officiating service rendered by the petitioner on retenairship as Medical Officer with effect from 1992 till his purported regularization firstly in 2008 and secondly in 2012 shall count for pension. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1006/2022 Civil Aviation Authority, through Director General CAA, Karachi and another v. Dr. Abdul Karim Channa and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4753 Const. P. 518/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4754 Const. P. 1313/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4755 M.A. 36/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Dilsher & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4756 Const. P. 888/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Prof: Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-22 Yes The Government of Sindh is directed to expedite the process by ensuring reconstituting of Search Committee within two months from the receipt of this order and shall also complete the process of interview of all the candidates afresh for the appointment for the post of Vice-Chancellor, University of Karachi, at the earliest. Meanwhile, the Search Committee (after reconstitution) shall send the copies of the original academic certificates/degrees/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents to the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for verification. The Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is directed to look into the academic qualification certificates/publications of the petitioners and the private respondents and after ascertaining genuineness or otherwise submit the report to the Search Committee constituted by the Government of Sindh in a sealed envelope within one month for further proceedings. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.392-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Universities & Boards Department Government of Sindh & another v. Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ahmed Qadri & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
4757 Const. P. 31/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Irfan Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Full Bench of N.I.R.C & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.721-K/2022 Irfan Ali Khan v. M/s. Habib Bank Limited & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
4758 Const. P. 1453/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Bachu Bibi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4759 Const. P. 7039/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mis Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pak Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Javaid and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1644/2022 Hilong Oil Services & Engineering Pakistan (Pvt) Limited Karachi v. Muhammad Javaid and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4760 Const. P. 8352/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Dr. Muhammad Riaz Kazi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4761 Const. P. 1567/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Razaque Dharejo and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4762 Const. P. 5674/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Mujahid Hussain and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4763 Const. P. 1057/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hamzo Khan Zardari and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4764 Const. P. 2805/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2266/2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4765 Const. P. 2805/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 Yes whether the impugned notification is, in conformity with the judgments passed by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Crl. Org. Petition No.89/2011, Ali Azhar Khan Baloch and Gul Hassan Jatoi; and, whether IGP Sindh is competent to issue the impugned notification under Section 12 of the Police Act, 1861, or it is for the Government of Sindh to order the repatriation of the petitioners to the ICT Police, Baluchistan Police and Pakistan Railways Police; and, whether police establishment is indivisible one force; and inter se transfer and subsequent absorption from the Federal Capital Police, Railways Police or Baluchistan Police to Sindh Police is permissible under Rule 1.5 of Police Rules, 1934; and, whether the repatriation of the petitioners to ICT Police, Baluchistan Police, and Pakistan Railways after rendering service for a considerable period in Sindh Police, attracts the principle of locus poenitentia and the same are within the principles laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2266/2022 Ansar Ahmed Gorar v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4766 Const. P. 522/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Muskan and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4767 Const. P. 922/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Khushal Das (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4768 M.A. 34/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Malook & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4769 Const. P. 372/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Nasir (Petitioner) VS SBCA & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4770 Const. P. 4082/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Haneef (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1715/2022 Pakistan Atomic Energy Commissoin (PAEC) through its Secretary (PAEC), Islamabad v. Muhammad Haneef and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4771 Const. P. 3972/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr.Rukhsana Iftikhar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Kausar Sultana Hussain
4772 Const. P. 2837/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Tabba Heart Institute and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4773 Const. P. 4219/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Mehran Industries (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4774 Const. P. 1707/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rawal Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-22 Yes 7. To elaborate further on the subject point of law, Article 25 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, guarantees equal treatment to all persons similarly placed. In terms of Article 27 of the Constitution, no citizen in the service of Pakistan or other persons shall be discriminated against in any manner. Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment as well. The disparity in the pay scale allowances of Stenographers in the District Judiciary is in the clear negation of law laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4775 Const. P. 4769/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4776 Const. P. 1406/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Moula Bux Sahito & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1932/2022 Azeem Qadir and others v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4046/2022 Farzana Perveen v. Maula Bux Sahito and others,C.M.A.4047/2022 Humaira Qayum v. Maula Bux Sahito and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed,Disposed Allowed
4777 Const. P. 576/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mahmood Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4778 Const. P. 4401/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Salma (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.784-K/2022 The Vice Chancellor Dow University of Health Sciences & others v. Province of Sindh through/Chancellor of Universities of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4779 Const. P. 4800/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Akram (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.A.8-K/2023 Muhammad Akram v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Finance Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
4780 Const. P. 8347/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Hameed Channa (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4781 Const. P. 657/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pasban Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4782 Const. P. 5459/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Masood Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Board of Revenue (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4783 Const. P. 7022/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4784 Const. P. 199/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mst. Sanober (Petitioner) VS SSP Larkana & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4785 Const. P. 630/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Nazish (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4786 Cr.Bail 282/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Hayee @ Balach Mengal (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-22 No Bail After Arrest Applications And Applications Under Section 426 Cr.P.C Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.1310/2022 Ghulam Mustafa v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4787 Const. P. 419/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Basheer Ahmed Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5397/2021 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar,C.A.2856/2022 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountabilitty, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Liyar Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
4788 Const. P. 68/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Kaneez Fatima and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4789 Const. P. 577/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Rehmat (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4790 Const. P. 312/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Ahsan (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4791 Const. P. 471/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Hashim (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4792 Const. P. 539/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Shabir Kubber (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4793 Const. P. 546/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Sunbal & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4794 Const. P. 221/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Sanjhan & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4795 Const. P. 265/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sh. Heema & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4796 Const. P. 659/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Rehmatullah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4797 Const. P. 797/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Sattar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4798 Const. P. 301/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Shahbab (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4799 Const. P. 519/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Fareeda (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4800 Criminal Appeal 37/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 pir bux alias piru (Appellant) VS the state (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4801 Const. P. 668/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Allauddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4268/2022 Allauddin v. Pakistan Qaimkhani Education Trust (Registered), Hyderabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4802 Const. P. 322/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Rabia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4803 Const. P. 621/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Salma & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4804 Const. P. 680/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Shabbir & ikram (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4805 Const. P. 761/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nizamuddin Mansoori (Petitioner) VS Abdul Latif & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.17-K/2023 Nizamuddin Mansoori thr. LRs. v. Abdul Lateef Rajput & others,C.P.1076-K/2022 Nizamuddin Mansoori thr. LRs. v. Abdul Lateef Rajput & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded
4806 II.A. 56/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Samad through L.rs (Appellant) VS Province Of Sindh & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.136-K/2022 Fayyaz Ahmed & another v. Abdul Samad deceased through his legal heirs & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4807 Const. P. 750/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Rizwana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4808 I. A 56/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Govt. of Sindh & Others (Appellant) VS L.A. Officer & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 29-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.14-K/2023 Khairuddin& another v. Government of Sindh through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
4809 Const. P. 7523/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Atif Ghias (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4810 Const. P. 2064/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4811 Const. P. 645/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Fahad Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4812 Const. P. 506/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Anam & Ors (Petitioner) VS SSP Badin (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4813 Const. P. 1134/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Trio Ind (Petitioner) VS Babo Sher and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.451-K/2023 M/s Trio Industries (Pvt) Limited v. Babu Sher & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4814 Const. P. 186/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Ayaz (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.9-K/2022 Ayaz v. Saadullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4815 Cr.Acq.A. 293/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SYED HAJI NIAZ MUHAMMAD SHAH (Appellant) VS ABDUL HAFEEZ & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4816 Const. P. 277/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Anwar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4817 Const. P. 6291/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Capt: Muhammad Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Port Qasim Authority and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4818 Const. P. 387/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Sanam & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4819 Const. P. 803/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Shafi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4820 Criminal Miscelleneous 525/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 NADIR & OTHERS (Applicant) VS RAZA MUHAMMAD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4821 Const. P. 439/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Fatima & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4822 Const. P. 383/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Soomar (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4823 Cr.Bail 91/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mohammad Ramzan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4824 Criminal Appeal 30/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Asif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4825 Const. P. 2732/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Asif Anwer (Petitioner) VS Election Commission of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4826 Const. P. 643/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Niaz Ali Lasghari (Petitioner) VS Ms. Fiza and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1478-K/2022 Niaz Ali Lashari v. Ms. Fiza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4827 Const. P. 695/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Rasool (Petitioner) VS Mst. Rizwana & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4828 Criminal Miscelleneous 775/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ MUGHAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4829 2023 SBLR Sindh 1995 Const. P. 3035/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Kamran Ali Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4830 Const. P. 540/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4831 Const. P. 3305/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shahrukh Ul Hassan & Other (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1263-K/2022 Shahrukh ul Hassan & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary, Local Government & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Barred by Time
4832 Const. P. 635/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Allah Wasayo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4833 Criminal Miscelleneous 618/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Younis (Applicant) VS S.P Complaint Cell Badin and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4834 Const. P. 560/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Azra & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4835 Const. P. 308/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Hajirah (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4836 Const. P. 434/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Shamim Abro (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4837 Const. P. 741/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ali Jan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JUL-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4838 Const. P. 1693/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Amanullah Lakheer (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4839 II.A. 67/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Usman Soomro thr: L.Rs (Appellant) VS Abdul Razzak Soomro (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 02-SEP-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.3147/2022 Abdul Razzak Soomro v. Muhammad Usman Soomro (decd.) thr. L.Rs Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4840 Const. P. 769/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Afzal Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4841 Const. P. 4193/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Farzana (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4842 Const. P. 1723/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Nabi Jaan (Petitioner) VS EOBI & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4843 Const. P. 3024/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Shamsuddin Dhoki and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2271/2022 Shamas uddin Dhoki and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4844 Const. P. 660/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Saifullah Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
4845 Const. P. 355/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Irfana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4846 Cr.Misc. 64/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mst. Fahmida Khoso (Applicant) VS SHO PS Tangwani and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4847 Const. P. 746/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Umeed Ali (Petitioner) VS Deputy Commissioner Larkana and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 Yes It is crystal clear that the respondentrevenue department/Government of Sindh has to make recruitment to every post applied by the candidates under the law as discussed supra as well as based on invalidated or incapacitated/minority/differently-abled and deceased quota reserved for those employees by issuing appointment order by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
4848 Const. P. 795/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Shafique (Petitioner) VS Mst. Aisha & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4849 Const. P. 2828/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Ameer Bux and an other (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4850 Const. P. 184/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Qazi Aslam (Petitioner) VS Saadullah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.8-K/2022 Qazi Aslam v. Saadullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
4851 Const. P. 982/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Akber (Petitioner) VS DEO, Sanghar and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4852 Const. P. 493/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Lubna and another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4853 Criminal Appeal 237/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 ALI DINO (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4854 Criminal Miscelleneous 537/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mushaid Ali Talpur (Applicant) VS The State and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4855 2023 SBLR Sindh 672 R.A (Civil Revision) 228/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Civil Aviation Authority (Applicant) VS Afzal ur Rehman (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 31-OCT-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4856 Const. P. 4597/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Rizwan Tahir & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.765-K/2022 The University of Karachi through its Registrar v. Province of Sindh through the Education Secretary, & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
4857 Const. P. 664/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Sattar Channa (Petitioner) VS Amjad Hussain Balhro & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
4858 Const. P. 455/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Saima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4859 F.R.A 3/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Farah Naz & Another. (Appellant) VS Mst. Naheed Chandio. (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4473/2022 Mst. Farah Naz and another v. Mst. Naheed Chandio Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4860 R.A (Civil Revision) 105/1998 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1998 Muhammad Saleem (Applicant) VS Syed Bashir Ahmed and other (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4861 Const. P. 682/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Attaullah & another (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4862 Const. P. 776/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mujahid Mehdi (Petitioner) VS Add. Distrct Judge Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4863 Const. P. 607/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Uzman & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4864 M.A. 1/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Akbar Zaman Shah & Ors (Appellant) VS Anwar Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4865 Const. P. 862/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Naveed Uddin Qadri and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4866 Const. P. 725/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ghulam Hussain Junejo (Petitioner) VS Returning Officer & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
4867 Const. P. 501/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Ghulam Khaton & another (Petitioner) VS D.I.G Mirpur Khas & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4868 Cr.Bail 1886/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL S/O MUHAMMAD RAFIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4869 Const. P. 7073/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Naseeb Ullah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.530-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Naseebullah & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4870 Const. P. 7084/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Javed Iqbal and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.541-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Javed Iqbal & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
4871 Const. P. 508/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Amber & antoher (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4872 Const. P. 488/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Parveen & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4873 Const. P. 4009/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Mr. Hamid Saleem (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.449-K/2023 Mr. Hamid Saleem v. The Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Islamabad Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4874 R.A (Civil Revision) 122/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ismail & Others (Applicant) VS Rustam & Others. (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4875 Const. P. 575/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Pari Khatoon (Petitioner) VS SHO PS Kunri & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4876 Const. P. 505/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Asghar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4877 Const. P. 465/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Musawar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4878 Const. P. 1827/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Ilyas (Petitioner) VS C.A.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4879 H.C.A 387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Pak Maniar Investment Ltd. & others (Appellant) VS Salebhoy & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAR-23 Yes Against judgment and preliminary decree Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.958-K/2023 Pak Maniar Investment Limited & others v. Salehbhoy deceased through its legal heirs & others,C.P.885-K/2023 Salehbhoy v. M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt) Ltd. & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending ,Pending
4880 Const. P. 6121/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3165/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
4881 Const. P. 5748/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr.Samreen Riaz Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS D.O.U.H.S and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4882 Const. P. 7028/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Najmul Kareem and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4883 Const. P. 5150/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Arshad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4884 Const. P. 236/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Javed Iqbal Burqi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4885 Const. P. 821/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Muhammad Shoaib & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4886 Const. P. 3507/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Mohsin Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4887 Const. P. 3634/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Abdul Shakoor & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4888 Const. P. 3001/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Sultan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.954-K/2023 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department Government of Sindh & others v. Sultan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4889 Const. P. 2920/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Abbas (Petitioner) VS Hon (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4890 Const. P. 2879/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P. No.D- 2939, 2980, 2991, 2992, 3046, 3066, 3075, 3076, 3077, 3084, 3095, 3096, 3275, 3306, 3318, 3454 of 2022 2022 Mir Muhammad khan and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-23 Yes The petitioners have challenged imposition/charge of Fuel Price Adjustment (FPA) in their electricity bills issued by respective Electricity Distribution Companies. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4891 Const. P. 868/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Sabia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4892 Cr.Bail 181/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 MEHMOOD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4893 Cr.Bail 393/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Mashooque Hussain (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4894 Cr.Bail 1429/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HASSAN S/O ABDUL MAJEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4895 Cr.Bail 2049/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BABU AMRO S/O IBRAHIM AMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4896 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 412/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 494 of 2022 2022 Director, D. G., Int.& Inv (Custom) Hyderabad. (Applicant) VS Liaquat Ali and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-24 Yes 2nd Proviso to Section 157(2) of the Customs Act, is not applicable retrospectively. Vehicles used in smuggling with false cavities and extra tanks cannot be released on payment of redemption fine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.214-K/2024 Liaquat Ali v. Director, Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4897 Criminal Miscelleneous 74/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Misc.A.S 75/2022,Cr.Trans.A S.78 & 79/2022 2022 BHARO MAL MALHI (Applicant) VS CHANDAN & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4898 Criminal Miscelleneous 550/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JAVED AHMED S/O ALI MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS LEARNED VITH JM KHI WEST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4899 Const. P. 922/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Nusrat Abbas Jafri (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4900 Criminal Miscelleneous 737/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MESSUM MEHDI S/O AMEER BUKSH (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 27-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4901 Cr.Bail 2584/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHID SARFARAZ S/O CH. MUHAMMAD ARSHAD TARIQ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4902 Cr.Bail 2304/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD IRSHAD S/O FAZAL SUBHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4903 Cr.Bail 1114/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MOAZAM S/O ABDUL BARI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4904 Cr.Bail 1280/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JAVED @ QADIR BUX S/O MUHAMMAD MURAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4905 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 53/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dirctor, Dir.Gen. Int. & Inv.(Custom) Hyderabd (Applicant) VS Akhtar Muhammad & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.168-K/2024 Akhter Muhammad v. Directorate General Intelligence & Investigation (Customs) & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
4906 Criminal Miscelleneous 850/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RASHID MEHMOOD S/O ABDUL WAHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4907 Cr.Bail 2689/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BISMILLAH KHAN S/O GUJJAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4908 Const. P. 2974/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Najaf Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4909 Cr.Bail 1846/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED MUSAB ALI S/O MOHSIN ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4910 Cr.Bail 1649/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O MUHAMMAD NAWAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4911 Election Appeal 241/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Wilayat Ali S/o Mushtaq Ali (Appellant) VS RO PS-124 Khi Central and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4912 Election Appeal 238/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Daniyal Ahmed S/o Iqbal Ahmed (Appellant) VS The RO NA-234 Korangi and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4913 Election Appeal 252/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Abdul Sattar Khan Qaimkhani S/o Ladhu Khan (Appellant) VS RO PS-62 Hyderabad and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4914 Const. P. 1931/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Farzand Ali & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4915 Cr.Bail 1504/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 USMAN S/O GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4916 Cr.Bail 1771/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 DEEDAR S/O EIDAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4917 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 633/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Director, I & I, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s Smart Power System (Pvt.) Ltd. & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-FEB-24 Yes initial burden of proof under section 187 of the Customs Act, 1969; discharge thereof; requirements Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4918 Cr.Bail 2064/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZEESHAN SAFDAR @ SHANI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4919 Cr.Rev 25/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Furqan Ali (Applicant) VS THE state (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4920 Cr.Bail 863/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Muhammad Kashif (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4921 Cr.Bail 1891/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED NIDA MUHAMMAD AGHA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4922 Criminal Miscelleneous 661/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MATLOOB HUSSAIN S/O GHULAM RAZZAQ (Applicant) VS IIIRD ADJ / JOP KHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4923 Cr.Bail 529/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SADAQAT ALI S/O LIAQUAT ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4924 Cr.Tran 36/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD JAVED & ORS (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4925 Const. P. 7434/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Sami Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-MAR-24 Yes it is now well settled that if a person during the pendency of constitutional petition fulfilled the requisite qualification to hold such a post then writ of quo warranto could not be issued against such person as such Employees no more suffered disqualification to hold the post in question. On the aforesaid proposition the Supreme Court in the case of Asif Hussain and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4926 Cr.Bail 1574/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ASHRAF @ QADIR S/O BHEERA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4927 Cr.Bail 754/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDULLAH S/O SHAREEN KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4928 Const. P. 95/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Parvez Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4929 Const. P. 6195/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Zafar Iqbal Bangash (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4930 Election Appeal 214/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Umer Khan S/o Muhammad Ismail (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4931 Cr.Bail 1668/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED SIKANDAR ABBASS S/O SYED RAEES ABBAS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4932 Election Appeal 103/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Tabish Toufiq Thr. Muhammad Saeed Anwar (Appellant) VS Chief Election Commissioner and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4933 Election Appeal 251/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Ramiz Siddiqui S/o Muhmmad Raeesul Haq (Appellant) VS The RO PS-121 Khi West and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4934 Election Appeal 250/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Yousuf Bwany S/o Muhammad Shafi Bwany (Appellant) VS RO PS-103 Khi East VII and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4935 Election Appeal 45/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Subhan Ali S/o Ahsan Muhammad (Appellant) VS Election Commission of Pakistan and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4936 Election Appeal 227/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Aloo Mal S/o Choith Mal (Appellant) VS The RO PS-108 Khi South-III and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4937 Criminal Miscelleneous 523/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD ANWAR S/O DUR MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4938 Cr.Bail 1738/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ZAHEER S/O BAKHSHAN & ANTOHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4939 Cr.Bail 2196/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SYED JAVED HUSSAIN S/O SYED TAQI HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4940 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 1520/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA No. 1521 of 2023 2023 The Collector, Collectorate of Customs, Hyderabad (Applicant) VS M/s. Frontier Waziristan Shell Petr. Services &ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-24 Yes period provided under section 179(3) of the Customs Act 1969 for passing an Order is mandatory and not directory Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4941 Cr.Bail 1082/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 KARIM BUKSH S/O SHAHMIR KHAN KALHORO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4942 Cr.Bail 1795/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AHMED S/O YOUSUF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4943 Criminal Miscelleneous 738/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ATIF FAIZ (Applicant) VS SAAD SUFAYAN HUSSAIN KHAN & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4944 Cr.Bail 1535/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL NABI S/O GHULAM MUSTAFA & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4945 Cr.Bail 493/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 KHALID HUSSAIN S/O MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4946 Const. P. 1024/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mumtaz Ali & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4947 Const. P. 482/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Abid Khorkhani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4948 Const. P. 657/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Murad (Petitioner) VS Akber Ali & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4949 Const. P. 753/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Jahangir Solangi & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the statements of the learned AAG, the petitioner/ growers/Khatedars who have paid the challan for aforesaid purpose shall proceed to appear before the concerned Official incharge Wheat Procurement Centers as notified on 24-05-2024 and after showing their requisite papers/Dhall/land revenue receipts of his land, the same application shall be processed forthwith by the concerned officials and the petitioner/growers/Khatedars and those small farmers who have not approached this Court shall also be issued BARDANA without fail and their ancillary issues about releasing the bills shall also be decided. So far as the receiving the procured wheat bags from the petitioner at the concerned Food Centers, it is subject to the Policy and if the policy so permits the same shall be taken care of by the concerned Officials without discrimination. In the meanwhile the concerned officials shall ensure their availability at the place of Wheat Procurement Centers; however if it is found that they remain absent, it shall be treated violation of the Order of this Court to attract penal action in terms of Article 204 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 and they shall be proceeded without further notice. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4950 Const. P. 474/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Qayoom Rajper (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4951 Criminal Miscelleneous 124/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Hashim Mahesar (Appellant) VS The State and others (Opponent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4952 Const. P. 1162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Azizullah Phulpoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4953 Criminal Miscelleneous 469/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Shehnaz (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4954 Criminal Miscelleneous 480/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ishtiaque Ahmed (Applicant) VS SSP Mpk & other (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4955 Criminal Miscelleneous 486/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Shrimati Warju (Applicant) VS SSP Complaint Cell MPK & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4956 Const. P. 204/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Haji Sher Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4957 Const. P. 604/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Barkat (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4958 Const. P. 478/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ashique Hussain Leghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4959 Const. P. 226/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Syed Safdar Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4960 Const. P. 1623/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Tarique Ali Kori (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4961 Const. P. 1736/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Fateh Muhammad (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4962 Const. P. 701/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Rashid Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4963 Const. P. 1271/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Saindad kalhoro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4964 Const. P. 5865/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Mehwish & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-24 Yes Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do is they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law. However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the underage issue if any, pending before the competent court of law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4965 Const. P. 405/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Niaz Muhammad shambani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4966 Const. P. 298/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Shabnam Parveen Through Attorney (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4967 Const. P. 96/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Nadeem Abbas Mallah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
4968 Const. P. 666/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Qadir Mahar & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
4969 Cr.Bail 764/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SUBASH S/O JAYRAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-24 Yes Before deciding the post-arrest bail on merit, which is based on two versions one forwarded by the complainant present in court and the second by the investigating officer who challaned the case, who challaned the present applicant along with others, these two versions require thorough probe by the trial Court. However, I am cognizant of the fact that, while deciding a Bail Application, only allegations made in the FIR, statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. nature and gravity of the charge, other incriminating material against the accused, legal pleas raised by the accused and relevant law have to be considered. However, in the present case, the record reveals that the offense with which the accused/applicant has been charged is non-compoundable. However, in view of the statement of the complainant as recorded above, as well as his affidavit of no objection, the case of the applicant/accused calls for further inquiry under sub-section (2) of Section 497 Cr.P.C. The record also shows that the applicant/accused is not a previous convict nor a hardened criminal. Moreover, he has been behind bars since his arrest and is no longer required for any investigation nor the prosecution has claimed any exceptional circumstance, that could justify keeping him behind bars for an indefinite period pending the determination of his guilt. Consequently, while taking into consideration the statement of the complainant before the Court and his affidavit, the applicant is admitted to post-arrest bail in crime No. 145 of 2024 of PS Steel Town subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4970 Const. P. 449/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zakir Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4971 Cr.Rev 26/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mujeeb Rehman & Another (Applicant) VS Mst. Beebul & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4972 Const. P. 132/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mujeeb u Rehman Bhayo (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4973 Criminal Miscelleneous 697/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Fahad Ahmed Gulzar S/o Gulzar Ahmed & another (Applicant) VS ASI/IO Saeed Mahroof & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes On the aforesaid proposition, the learned counsel for the applicants contended that the Judicial Magistrate had no authority to interfere in the investigation and exceeded his jurisdiction while directing the Investigating Officer to present the chargesheet before the Intellectual Property Tribunal in Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962. On facts, he contended that Sub Inspector PS PIB colony had lodged a false case against the applicants, as the alleged occurrence did not take place. The prosecution specifically alleged that the applicants had stocked different brands of Cigarettes, injurious to health but the same was never referred to the chemical examiner for verification. He maintained that in the peculiar circumstances of the case chemical examination of the purported case property was essential to corroborate the ocular account. The learned counsel further submitted that even if the prosecution version was assumed to be correct, Section 66-A of the Copyright Ordinance 1962 could not be invoked against them. The impugned order had thus seriously prejudiced the applicants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4974 Const. P. 1417/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2012 Atiq ur Rehman & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
4975 Const. P. 299/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Sabir Hussain Bhatti (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4976 Const. P. 234/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Abdul Qudoos (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4977 Const. P. 480/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Sikandar Ali Kubar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4978 Const. P. 234/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mansoor Ahmed Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4979 Criminal Miscelleneous 114/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD ADEEL AKHTAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-JUL-24 Yes A bare perusal of the afore-quoted provision of law makes it clear that whenever an overt act is materialized and ended into an overt act, the provision of Section 506(ii) PPC would not be applicable and the only provision that will remain in the field is the overt act, which is committed in consequence of criminal intimidation. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Rana Muhammad Imran Nasarullah Vs. The State 2022 SCMR 1946. However, in the present case, the complainant simply stated that the accused came to his house and on the pointation of a pistol extended threats of dire consequences, intimidated him to sign a divorce deed and other documents, and left such house after intimidation However the subject act was no materialized and ended into an overt act for the investigating officer opined that no such incident ever took place and the complainant had falsely roped the accused in the case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4980 Cr.Bail 909/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SYED FURQAN ALI S/O SYED ASHFAQ ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-JUL-24 Yes To prove the charge against an accused under Section 489-F. P.P.C. all the ingredients of section 489-F, P.P.C. must be proved through cogent evidence and beyond any shadow of a doubt, however, in this case, the complainant claims that he made a Marketing business transaction with the applicant and the applicant issued a cheque for an amount of Rs.15000,000/- and in this regard, and the applicant has pleaded that the subject cheques were issued as a security amount in a business transaction which was not for the encashment as such he made an attempt to stop the payment but the Bank refused to entertain his request due to insufficient funds which are wrong notion on the part of Bank, however this aspect of the case is to be determined by the trial Court under what circumstances, the cheque (s) was/were issued and what was the intention of the person, issuing it. 7. Prima facie, the mere issuance of a cheque(s) and its being dishonored by itself is not an offense, unless and until dishonesty on the part of a payer is proved. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4981 Const. P. 414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Younas Channa (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
4982 Const. P. 558/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Ravi Das (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4983 Criminal Miscelleneous 468/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Kaneez Fatima (Applicant) VS I.G Karachi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4984 Const. P. 1169/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Dr Shafi Muhammad Ghanghro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4985 Criminal Miscelleneous 772/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst. Bashul Shaikh (Appellant) VS The State & Others (Opponent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4986 Const. P. 64/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Samad Thebo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4987 Cr.Bail 987/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Shahid S/o Abdul Ghani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-24 Yes It is settled that when an offense is also punishable with a fine only, the accused shall be entitled to bail as of right because if at the trial he is only sentenced to a fine, period as under trial prisoner due to refusal of bail shall amount to a case of double jeopardy. The Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799, has held in categorical terms that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be a exception and directed the Courts of the country to follow this principle in its letter and spirit because principles of law enunciated by the Supreme Court are constitutionally binding [under Article 189] on all Courts throughout the country. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4988 Cr.Bail 927/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 ALI RAZA S/O MUHAMMAD CHAND (Applicant) VS THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes In the instant case, prima facie the abductee has given two versions of the incident, one before the Police after her recovery and secondly before the Magistrate on 13.01.2024 voluntarily after 8 days from the date of registration of F.I.R, though the alleged offense took place on 16.12.2023 alleging therein that her brother in law Faizan had abducted her and committed the alleged crime but she failed to disclose the name of the present applicant though the applicant was already arrested in the FIR on 07.01.2024 and her statement was recorded on 13.01.2024, however, the statement does not transpire the name of the applicant, which makes the case of the applicant that of further inquiry. On the aforesaid proposition, I seek guidance from the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Ehsan Ullah vs. The State (2012 SCMR 1137) wherein it has been held by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:- ???This shows that in the present case the prosecution itself has two versions vis-??-vis the petitioner, first of the complainant party according to which the petitioner was present at the spot and had resorted to firing and second of the investigating agency according to which the petitioner was not present at the spot and he was abetting his co-accused from behind the scene. All these considerations surely render the case against the petitioner one of further inquiry into his guilt.??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4989 Const. P. 805/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Imam Bux (Petitioner) VS Secretary Public Health & Rural Dev & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4990 Criminal Appeal 151/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Bilawal (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4991 Const. P. 1576/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Khan Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4992 Const. P. 2488/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Rukhsana Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4993 Const. P. 69/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Sajid Ali Phalia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4994 Const. P. 226/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Lachman Das (Petitioner) VS Seth Harchand Rai and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4995 Const. P. 477/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khursheed Ahmed Leghari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
4996 R.A (Civil Revision) 210/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Moula Bux & others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 No The courts below have consistently found against the applicants??? claims, and these decisions should not be overturned in a revision proceedings unless extraordinary circumstances exist. A revision court does not re-examine evidence like an appellate court. 8. Based on the foregoing, the findings of the courts below are not jurisdictionally flawed and do not show any misreading or non-reading of evidence that could have led to a miscarriage of justice. Therefore, the revision application is without merit and is dismissed. Each party will bear their costs. 9. These are the reasons for my short order even date, whereby, the Revision Application is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4997 Cr.Bail 1477/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Mst. Yasmeen W/o Zulfiqar Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-JUL-24 Yes According to the case of the prosecution, 560 grams of Heroin was recovered from the applicant, not only because the quantity of 60 grams exceeds the upper limit of 500 grams to bring the case within the prohibition contained in section 497(1) Cr. P.C. The Supreme Court in such circumstances granted post-arrest bail to the lady accused, keeping in view the (II) Proviso of Section 497 Cr. P.C. in the case of Mst. Kainat Bibi v. The State (2022 SCMR 609). The Supreme Court also in the case of Ateebur Rehman v. The State (2016 SCMR 1424), which involved the recovery of 1014 grams of heroin, and Ayaz Khan and another v. The State (2020 SCMR 350), which involved the recovery of 1100 grams of heroin, granted bail in both cases. In the present case, the guilt or innocence of the applicants is yet to be determined by the trial Court. The prosecution has not placed any material to establish that the applicant is a previous convict, mere involved in the same and similar offenses in the past cannot be a ground to refuse bail as this case can be decided on merit, therefore past record cannot be cited as precedent to refuse bail on this point. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
4998 Const. P. 410/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Waqef Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-24 No Court directs CRO update to reflect acquittals, ensuring accurate case records and safeguarding individuals from unjust criminal stigma." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4999 Const. P. 591/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Akshay Kumar & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5000 Const. P. 1517/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Muhammad Chano (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5001 Criminal Appeal 208/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 QAMBAR S/O KHAIR MUHAMMAD (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-24 Yes We have noticed that the sample of purported narcotics was received by the chemical analyzer on January 5, 2022, from the I.O of Gulbahar Police Station, though the alleged recovery was made on December 30, 2021. The sample must be sent to the lab within 72 hours of seizure. All items in the police station's storeroom must be recorded in Register No. XIX. In the present case, the prosecution failed to send the drug sample to the lab within 72 hours as required by the law. The prosecution has not provided a valid reason for the 6-day delay. The issue raised has created reasonable doubt, but the lower courts failed to consider this aspect of the case in favor of the appellant. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Asif Ali v The State 2024 SCMR 1408, Muhammad Hazir v The State 2023 SCMR 986, Qaiser & another v The State 2022 SCMR 1641. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5002 Const. P. 4301/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M/s Focus Shipping Agnecy & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5003 Const. P. 4419/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Mehwish Hameed and Another (Petitioner) VS School Education & Literacy Dept: and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-24 Yes The High Court can review SPSC decisions if they are unconstitutional, illegal, or unfair. However, the Court cannot substitute its judgment for the SPSC's, but can only ensure the decision's legality and fairness. However, in the present case, it appears that the Sindh Public Service Commission announced the posts of subject specialist Zoology and Botany (BS-17) under the School Education and Literacy Department Government of Sindh vide advertisement No. 09/2022 dated 11.11.2022, both petitioners applied against the said posts and secured fewer marks in pre-interview written test on Urban quota as alleged. The recommendation process has not been completed vide press release dated 10.10.2023, 17.10.2023, and 21.11.2023, and the candidates have been accommodated to their respective posts, at this stage to scrutinize the MCQs answer sheet of the petitioners by this Court is a herculean task, which cannot be undertaken under Article 199 of the Constitution, however, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Chairmen Sindh Public Service Commercial redressal of their grievances in terms of regulations framed by the competent authority of the Government of Sindh, which shall be taken care of after providing meaning hearing of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5004 Const. P. 1596/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Zulfiqar Ali Qazi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5005 Const. P. 583/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Bahawal jarwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5006 Const. P. 601/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Kashif Illahi Bambhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5007 Cr.Bail 224/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ali Gohar & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-SEP-24 Yes The applicants are accused of a heinous crime, including murder, and prima facie, there is sufficient incriminating evidence to connect them to the alleged offenses. It is well settled that while the court does not delve into a deep analysis of the evidence at this stage, the available materials, including the FIR, witness statements, and medical reports, support the prosecution's allegations. The delay in lodging the FIR is explained by the nature of the incident and the immediate medical attention required for the injured. There is no evidence of any malicious intent on the part of the complainant. The gravity of the charges and the potential for the applicants to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, granting bail at this stage would not be appropriate. Therefore, the bail application is dismissed. The trial court is directed to examine the material witnesses within two months and if the charge is not framed the same shall be framed on the date so fixed by the trial court. The direction of this court shall not be ignored at all, which has serious repercussions. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5008 Criminal Miscelleneous 530/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Babar Ali (Applicant) VS SSP Sanghar & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes It is evident from the contents of application under sections 22-A & B Cr.P.C filed by respondent Akbar Ali and FIR No.106/2024 lodged by applicant Babar Ali in respect of same incident, that it is a case of free fight between both the parties and both of them received injuries at the hands of each other; therefore, as per dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in its landmark judgment in the case of Mst. Sughran Bibi Vs. The Stte [PLD 2018 SC 595], the second FIR of the same incident was/is unwarranted. In a recent unreported case of Munawar Alam Khan Vs. Qurban Ali Malano & others [Criminal Petition No.31-K of 2022] decided on 08-04-2024, the Supreme Court while dealing with similar matter, discussed the proposition qua lodging second FIR of the same incident. The relevant portion reads as under:- 6. A common culture prevailing with our society and often chosen by the legal fraternity is to settle the disputes by converting them into criminal prosecution against each other which, in our candid view, is apparent on the record owing to the reason that there are other cases running in Court inter se the parties. After having received kicks and fists blows at the hands of the respondents, the petitioner has remained successful in seeking a direction for lodging an FIR from the trial Court, whereas FIR bearing No.98 of 2019 was also lodged against the petitioner in a similar context by some Advocates of accused/respondents' group. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5009 Const. P. 1552/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Lashkar Khan Lashari (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5010 Criminal Appeal 57/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 ABDUL REHMAN S/O MUHAMMAD SULTAN@ MUHAMMAD AYYAZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 01-JUL-24 Yes It is a settled principle of law that no one should be convicted of a crime based on presumption in the absence of strong evidence of unimpeachable character and legally admissible. Similarly, the mere heinous or gruesome nature of the crime shall not detract the Court of law in any manner from the due course to judge and make the appraisal of evidence in a laid down manner and to extend the benefit of reasonable doubt to an accused person being indefeasible and inalienable right of an accused. It is also an established principle of law that an accused person is presumed to be innocent until and unless he is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and this presumption of his innocence continues until the prosecution succeeds in proving the charge against him beyond a reasonable doubt based on legally admissible, confidence-inspiring, trustworthy and reliable evidence. It has also been held by the Superior Courts that conviction must be based upon unimpeachable evidence and certainty of guilt and any doubt arising in the prosecution case must be resolved in favor of the accused Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5011 Const. P. 537/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Raheem (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5012 Const. P. 90/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mudasir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5013 Const. P. 1737/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sanaullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5014 Const. P. 423/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Talib Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Govt of sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5015 Const. P. 617/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Asif Ali Rattar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5016 Criminal Appeal 683/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 DR ZAIB UN NISA W/O ZULFIQAR (Appellant) VS MUDASAR SHABBIR & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-JUL-24 No To attract provisions of Section 3 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, the court is required to examine whether the property was an immovable property; secondly, whether the person was the owner or the property was in his lawful possession; thirdly the accused entered into or upon the property unlawfully; fourthly that such entry was to dispossess i.e. ouster, evict or deriving out of possession against the will of the person in actual possession or to grab i.e. capture, seize suddenly, take greedily or unfairly, or to control i.e. to exercise power or influence or regulate or governor relates to authority over what is not in one's physical possession or to occupy i.e. holding possession, reside in or something. If the act of the accused comes within the meaning of any of the words viz. dispossess, grab, control or occupy on the date when Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, was promulgated then action can be initiated as provided under Section 4 of the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005. 10 The law has also made it clear that a person who is proven guilty shall not be saved from the punishment for which he may be liable under any other law for the time being in force. The provisions of section 3(2) are salutary and mandatory. It is to alleviate the suffering and is also an effective deterrent against crime. The Legislature has taken full care to close all doors of any injustice to the parties. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5017 Criminal Miscelleneous 716/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Ibrahim S/o Usman (Applicant) VS The State & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-24 Yes The condition precedent for recording an FIR is that it should convey the information of an offense and that too a cognizable one. The remedy of filing a direct complaint cannot measure or match up to the mechanism provided under section 154, Cr.P.C., in which the Officer Incharge of a Police Station is duty-bound to record the statement and register the FIR if a cognizable offence is made out. If in every case it is presumed or assumed that instead of insisting or emphasizing the lodgment of an FIR, the party may file a direct complaint, then the purpose of recording an FIR, as envisaged under section 154, Cr.P.C., will become redundant and futile and it would be very easy for the police to refuse the registration of an FIR with the advice to file a direct complaint. However, in some exceptional circumstances, the alternate remedy in the shape of a direct complaint may be availed but not in every case. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5018 Cr.Rev 100/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 ASKARI BANK LIMITED (Applicant) VS MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-NOV-24 Yes It is settled law that when the criminal charges depend on the outcome of the civil cases, proceeding with the criminal case before the civil cases are resolved could potentially harm the accused. Additionally, the amount owed, which is a crucial element in the criminal case, can only be determined in the civil court, and the criminal court is divested from such determination. 19. To establish criminal liability under these sections, it would be necessary to demonstrate that the accused has defaulted on a financial obligation to the bank and has failed to repay the amount due. The specific nature of the breached obligations and representations would need to be examined to determine whether they directly relate to the accused's financial obligations to the bank and whether they constitute a criminal offense under the FIO. Mere breach of a contract or civil obligation, without more, may not necessarily constitute a criminal offense. The prosecution would need to prove that the accused's actions were intentional, dishonest, or fraudulent and that caused significant financial loss to the bank. Additionally, the bank cannot unilaterally determine the amount owed and initiate criminal proceedings as such a proper judicial process is necessary to establish liability and debt amount before criminal charges can be pursued. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5019 Const. P. 590/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zubair Ahmed Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5020 Const. P. 1779/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Wazir Ali Chachar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5021 Const. P. 259/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Hajan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5022 Const. P. 2499/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shahid Masood (Petitioner) VS Mohammad Imran Latif and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5023 Const. P. 444/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hoat Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5024 Const. P. 429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Shamshad Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5025 Const. P. 78/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sikander Ali Butt (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
5026 Const. P. 847/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Rasheed kalwar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5027 Cr.Bail 179/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Noman Haneef (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5028 Criminal Miscelleneous 471/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Khalique (Applicant) VS SSP Complaint cell Mpk & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5029 Criminal Miscelleneous 467/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Vidhya (Applicant) VS The province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5030 Cr.Acq.A. 738/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 TAHREEM FATIMA W/O RAHAT HUSSAIN (Appellant) VS IMTIAZ AHMED & ORS (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-DEC-24 No The case pertains to abandoned properties in Sindh, focusing on encroachments, litigation, and asset management, with directives for detailed reports and corrective actions Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5031 Const. P. 6807/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Imam Bux (Petitioner) VS M/s Sea Board Service (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-24 Yes Primarily, resignation is characteristically the voluntary surrender of a position by the one resigning, made freely and not under duress, here petitioner moved an application to the competent authority of the respondent company for withdrawal of his resignation on 07.08.2004, however before the subject application, the respondent company accepted the resignation of the petitioner on 10.07.2004 (page No. 305 of memo of petition) and it was accepted, but the petitioner remained mum and waited for 27 days to move the application to the respondent company for withdrawal of resignation. Prima facie, the petitioner was/is responsible for such delay, failure thereof, and the respondent company could not be held responsible. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5032 Const. P. 1187/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Meer Ahmed Mirbahar (Petitioner) VS P.O SIndh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5033 Const. P. 633/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Narsingh Das (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5034 Const. P. 2866/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Wariyam and others (Petitioner) VS Prov.of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 No Contempt--Admittedly, the aforesaid petitioners are literate i.e. Primary Pass, which is requisite qualification to claim regularization, therefore, the compliance report submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor is not in line with the order dated 01.11.2018 passed by this Court in letter and spirit. Resultantly, the compliance report is rejected--To be listed on 02.12.2020 at 11:00 a.m., when alleged contemnor must be present in Court along with his compliance report. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5035 Const. P. 1269/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2009 Agha S. Attaullah Shah S/o Agha S. Gul Hassan Sha (Petitioner) VS C.D.G.K., thr: DCO, Civic Centre, Karachi (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5036 Const. P. 4399/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Umair Hussain (Petitioner) VS I.G of Police and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5037 Const. P. 7004/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Syed Umer Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5038 Const. P. 4168/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Muhmmad Ali Asad (Petitioner) VS L.D.A and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5039 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5040 Const. P. 2839/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and otehrs (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5041 2018 PLC (CS) Note 115 Const. P. 6383/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Imtiaz Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 28-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5042 Const. P. 4045/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Taj Rani (Petitioner) VS National Bank of Pakistan (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.70-K/2018 Mst: Taj Rani v. The President National Bank of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
5043 2020 PLC (CS) 345 Const. P. 2722/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Abdul Hameed Solangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2377/2018 Abdul Hameed Solangi & others v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Education & Litreracy Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn.CMA.1027/2020 for withdrawal is Allowed
5044 Const. P. 7104/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rustam Ali Soomro (Petitioner) VS NAB & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5045 2018 PLC CS 89 Const. P. 178/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Khan Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-FEB-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5046 Const. P. 1026/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Aurangzeb and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-OCT-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5047 Const. P. 2899/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Yasse Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5048 2019 CLC 85 Const. P. 1144/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Amir S/o Abdul Zahoor (Petitioner) VS Nasir Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.533-K/2017 Amir v. Nasir and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
5049 2018 YLR 1639 Const. P. 770/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Faiz Muhammad & Another (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Sindh Police & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5050 Const. P. 4441/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Marina (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5051 Const. P. 4809/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Saeed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5052 2018 CLC Note 51 Const. P. 1368/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Niaz Hussain Shah S/o Shah Hussain (Petitioner) VS Mst. Samina Iqbal & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5053 Const. P. 1111/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Zahid Hussain and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5054 Cr.Bail 1730/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Bilal (Appellant) VS the State (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-DEC-16 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5055 Cr.Bail 94/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Deedar Ali son of Allah Bux Lakho (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5056 Const. P. 1134/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Fatima (Petitioner) VS Vice Chancellor, Peoples University of Medical (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5057 Const. P. 776/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-17 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5058 Const. P. 2397/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Banaras Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5059 Const. P. 365/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Khadim Hussain (Petitioner) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5060 Const. P. 2533/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Asif Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-APR-19 Yes Sindh Government /Police Department cannot circumvent the law to make recruitment to the post of ASI on the basis of Son/Shaheedquota by issuing Standing Ordersor by invoking Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion andTransfer) Rules,1974 and Sindh Shaheed Recognition and Compensation Act, 2014by relaxing the requisite qualification for appointment in the disciplinary force. The appointment of ASI can only be made through competitive process on merit. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.392-K/2019 Asif Ali v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Home Deprtt: Govt. of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5061 Const. P. 1903/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Ghulam Qadir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.341-K/2019 Ghulam Qadir v. Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5062 Const. P. 2219/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Ramzan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5063 Const. P. 1800/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5064 Const. P. 6090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Farrukh Mirza (Petitioner) VS The Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-FEB-20 Yes The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. The petitioner, who is present in person, has referred to his comments filed on 27.01.2020 on report dated 07.12.2019 of Nazir of this Court and submits that he has received 50% commuted portion of pension with certain increases, but the restoration of 50% commuted portion of pension amount has been wrongly calculated by alleged contemnor as well as by Nazir of this Court--In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded as above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the respondent-department that compliance of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan has been made in its letter & spirit. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.386-K/2020 Dr. Farrukh Mirza v. The Secretary Finance Division Islamabad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
5065 2020 PLC (CS) 392 Const. P. 6770/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Bostan Khan Khattak (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5066 Const. P. 166/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sajid Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-MAY-19 Yes Reverting to the plea taken by the Petitioner that other seven candidates were allowed to appear in the interview and he was left out. The aforesaid plea of the Petitioner cannot be considered as a valid ground to appear in the interview; therefore we do not see any discrimination on their part as discussed supra. The Petitioner has failed to make out a case on the basis of discrimination Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aziz-ur-Rehman, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.390-K/2019 Sajid Ali v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Finance and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
5067 Const. P. 2393/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Manzar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.430-K/2019 Federal Board of Revenue thr. its Chairman v. Manzar Hussain & others,C.P.484-K/2019 Amer Rashid Shaikh v. Manzar Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous,Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
5068 Const. P. 214/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Ameen (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5069 Const. P. 3750/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Airport Hotel Sky Rooms Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS N.I.R.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5070 Const. P. 1820/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shahid Ali Bhutto & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.572-K/2018 Shahid Ali Bhutto and others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5071 Const. P. 509/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Arif Khan and 31 others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 01-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.412-K/2017 M/s State Oil Company Ltd. v. Arif Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5072 Const. P. 1932/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Saleem @ Muhammad Soomar (Petitioner) VS Senior Member Board of Revenue & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5073 Const. P. 550/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5074 Const. P. 451/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Fouzia (Petitioner) VS The I.G Prision Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5075 Const. P. 3751/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Airport Hotel Sky Rooms Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS N.I.R.C and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5076 Const. P. 801/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Syed Nadeeem Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5077 Const. P. 1761/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Dost Ali Baloch (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5078 Const. P. 265/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Abdul Qadir Memon (Petitioner) VS D.G NAB and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-DEC-16 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3545/2018 National Accountability Bureau thr. its Chairman, Islamabad v. Abdul Qadir Memon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
5079 Const. P. 1969/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Muhammad Aslam and another (Petitioner) VS Rajab Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5080 Const. P. 4510/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Irfan & 99 Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5081 Const. P. 283/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Khushi Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5082 Const. P. 380/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5083 Const. P. 2116/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Muhammad Azeem Memon (Petitioner) VS Cantonment Board & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5084 Const. P. 3580/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Humair Altaf (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-MAR-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.221-K/2017 Humair Altaf v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Petroleum & Natural Resources and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5085 Const. P. 328/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ghulam Hussain (Petitioner) VS Sharif & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5086 Const. P. 199/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.167-K/2019 Ahsanullah Abro v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman NAB and others,C.P.125-K/2019 Muhammad Ayaz Abro v. Federation of Pakistan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5087 2019 PLC (CS) 1408 Const. P. 649/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Mst. Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-JAN-19 Yes Petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the non -action by the alleged Contemnors, filed an Application (CMA 14152/2015)under Article 204 of the Constitution, praying therein to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the alleged Contemnors. The alleged Contemnors have filed statements showing compliance of the order dated 10.9.2015, passed by this Court with the assertion that they offered the post of Balder in BS-1 to the son of the Petitioner, Contempt Proceedings is always between the Court and the alleged Contemnor, thus its scope cannot be enlarged. the post of Field Assistant under Rule-10-A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant , for the simple reason that the aforesaid post can only be filled as per recruitment Rules. The explanation offered by the Respondents vide (CMA 14152/2015),prima facie, is tenable under the law as the Petitioners son was offered the post of Beldar in BS-1 by the Respondents in compliance of order dated 10.9.2015 passed by this Court; but the same was refused by the Petitioners son. we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged Contemnors that substantial compliance of the order dated10.9.2015 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit, therefore at this juncture, no case for initiating Contempt Proceedings is made out against the alleged Contemnors. Thus, we are not minded to proceed with any further on the listed application searing , having no merits, are accordingly dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5088 Const. P. 1119/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Nasira Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Chairman Executive Committee & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5089 Const. P. 1556/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Khuda Bux and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.200-K/2019 Khuda Bux and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Health Department Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5090 Const. P. 210/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Atam Mal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5091 Const. P. 140/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Allah Dino & Other (Intervenor) VS P>O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5092 Criminal Miscelleneous 9/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst Jannat Khatoon (Insolvent) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Contemnor) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5093 Const. P. 5645/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Waqas Khan & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5094 Cr.Acq.A. 15/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Syed Ameen (Appellant) VS Ist A.D.J SBA & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5095 Const. P. 488/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Aftab Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5096 Cr.Misc. 9/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst Jannat Khatoon (Applicant) VS D.I.G, Hyd and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5097 Cr.Rev 55/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Ali Muhammad Joyo (Applicant) VS Baggan @ Asghar and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-MAR-13 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.71-K/2019 Ali Muhammad Joyo v. Baggan @ Asghar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
5098 Cr.Bail 295/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Ashraf Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-JUN-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Crl.P.200/2020 Abdul Rasheed v. The State thr. P.G. Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5099 Const. P. 787/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M. Imran Khan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5100 Const. P. 2243/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Sarfaraz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS N.T.S and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.614-K/2018 Sarfaraz Ahmed v. National Testing Services and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5101 Const. P. 6723/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Kassim (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5102 Const. P. 2018/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mohammad Sadiq (Petitioner) VS Market Committee and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1426-K/2018 Market Committee Karachi and another v. Muhammad Saddiq and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5103 2019 PLC Lab. 19 Const. P. 7369/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 M/s Sindh Club (Petitioner) VS Nazar Hussain and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5104 Const. P. 460/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s K.H Fama Textile Processing (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5105 Const. P. 4577/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Salam International (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 09-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5106 Const. P. 7117/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s A & J Apparel (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5107 Const. P. 527/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-20 Yes Contempt--Primarily substantial compliance of the judgment passed by this Court has been made. Prima-facie, the question of not considering some of the petitioners in the regularization process cannot be decided in contempt proceedings, which is a separate cause of action and it is for the aggrieved petitioners to avail their remedy as provided under the law against the purported action on the part of respondents, if any, for the reasons that the respondent-department was directed to take a fresh decision for regularization of their service, without any discrimination, in accordance with law subject to the budgetary sanction, qualifications, and eligibility of the petitioners, which compliance report has now been submitted. Prima-facie the reasons assigned in the aforesaid report cannot be dilated upon for and against in contempt proceedings. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1421-K/2018 Agha Shoaib Abbas and others v. The Province of Sindh and others,C.P.140-K/2021 Agha Shohaib Abbas & others v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed,Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
5108 2020 PLC (CS) 101 Const. P. 2831/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Nazia Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5109 2020 SBLR Sindh 535 Const. P. 3467/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Shaista Shoukat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5110 2018 MLD 794 Cr.Bail 1373/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 LUTUFULLAH S/O MAVAZ KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5111 Const. P. 866/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Karachi Vegetable & Tajir Association (Petitioner) VS M/s JS Bank Ltd and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5112 Const. P. 7142/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mumtaz Ali Magsi (Petitioner) VS I.G Police and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5113 Const. P. 6870/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Muhammad Sajid (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-FEB-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5114 Const. P. 4250/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Jameela (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1454-K/2018 Mst. Jameela v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
5115 Const. P. 984/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Masood and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5116 Const. P. 5895/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Abdul Jabbar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-NOV-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.65-K/2019 Abdul Jabbar v. Province of Sindh and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5117 Const. P. 282/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Muhammad Kazim Larik and others (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5118 Const. P. 921/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Muhammad Nasir & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5119 Const. P. 4391/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zaheer uddin Mujahid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.277/2019 Zaheeruddin Mujahid v. Province of Sindh thr. Cooperative Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5120 Const. P. 1181/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Party-1 (Petitioner) VS Party-2 (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-MAR-17 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5121 Const. P. 1580/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Abdul Majeed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed: of Pakistan & ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5122 Const. P. 5595/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sajid Ali Mangi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3523/2017 Sajid Ali Mangi & others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1593/2017 Sajid Ali Mangi & others v. Province of Sindh, thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
5123 Const. P. 5631/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Chandomal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5124 Const. P. 5626/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rizwan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3715/2017,C.P.585-K/2017,C.A.1598/2017,C.P.3660/2017,C.A.1607/2017,C.P.583-K/2017,C.P.587-K/2017,C.P.586-K/2017,C.P.584-K/2017 SCP Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed ,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
5125 Const. P. 1102/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Vicky Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 27-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4380/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others,C.A.1609/2017 Vicky Kumar v. The Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
5126 Const. P. 5519/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Kelash Babu (Petitioner) VS SPSC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5127 Const. P. 1360/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Adil Rashid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.393-K/2019 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others,C.A.20-K/2020 Adil Rashid v. Federation of Pakistan thr. Secy: M/o Ports & Shipping and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
5128 Const. P. 3215/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Malik Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5129 Const. P. 5987/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Dr. Sabrina and Ors (Petitioner) VS SBCA and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-NOV-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5130 Const. P. 6900/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s PICIC Insurance Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5131 Const. P. 2236/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ayeshah Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5132 Const. P. 3158/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Telenor MicroFinance Bank (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5133 Const. P. 1339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Kings Apparels Ind (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5134 Const. P. 1340/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s S.M Trades (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5135 Const. P. 8535/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s A & J Apparel (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5136 2019 PLC (CS) 1278 Const. P. 4930/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Musheer Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.263-K/2020 Province of Sindh and others v. Musheer Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5137 2018 PLC CS 817 Const. P. 1267/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2010 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.558-K/2017 Zaheer Ahmed v. Federation of Pakistan and others,C.A.29-K/2014 Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar and another,C.P.651-K/2013 Federal Board of Revenue and another v. Zaheer Ahmed Kalwar and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Leave Granted
5138 2018 PLC Lab. 171 Const. P. 3573/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 M/s Wyeth Pakistan (Petitioner) VS Nasimul Hassan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-SEP-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5139 Const. P. 965/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.325-K/2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5140 Const. P. 965/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Abdul Qayoom Solangi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-NOV-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.325-K/2018 Abdul Qayoom Solangi v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5141 Const. P. 1443/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Najeeb ur Rehman Jakhrani. (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors. (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 06-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.81-K/2018 Mir Najeeb-ur-Rehman Jakhrani v. The Province of Sindh and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5142 2018 PCr.LJ 1027 Cr.Rev 156/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 QABIL KHAN S/O SAHAB KHAN (Applicant) VS THE 5TH ADDL.S.J. SOUTH KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5143 Const. P. 7513/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Wahid Bux Malla (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5144 Const. P. 5331/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Shafqat Hussain Shah (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5145 2019 PLC (CS) 771 Const. P. 8265/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Majid Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.135/2018 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others,C.A.636/2019 Ali Bux Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
5146 2020 PLC (CS) 245 Const. P. 1595/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Fazl - e - Akbar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Defence Housing Authority and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-FEB-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5147 2018 YLR 360 Cr.Rev 154/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 ALI MUHAMMAD S/O LATE HAJI MOOSA (Applicant) VS SHAHZAD S/O ALI MUHAMMAD & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5148 Const. P. 143/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Abbas Raza (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-OCT-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4960/2018 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others,C.A.506/2020 Federation of Pakistan thr. Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad v. Syed Abbas Raza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Allowed
5149 Const. P. 4433/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Abdul Waheed & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-DEC-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.298/2018 Sajid Hussain & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5150 Const. P. 4429/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s.Multiple Autoparts Industries(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2964/2018 M/s Multiple Autoparts Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others,C.A.67-K/2019 M/s Multiple Autoparts Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
5151 Const. P. 4918/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Gatron (Ind.) Ltd and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5152 2018 MLD 563 Cr.Bail 975/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 ZEESHAN @ SHANI S/O SULEMAN @ CHACHOO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5153 Const. P. 4622/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-FEB-20 No Contempt--- This petition was disposed of vide order dated 29.10.2018 with direction to the respondents to award benefit of Office Memorandum dated 11.02.1985 to the petitioner, without discrimination, within a period of two months. Respondents assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition No.1456-K of 2018, which was dismissed vide order dated 18.7.2019. Their review application was also dismissed vide order dated 24.12.2019. Now the respondents have complied with the order by depositing an amount of Rs.1, 208,000.00 with the Nazir of this Court and the same has been disbursed in favour of the petitioner, which factum is disclosed in the order dated 10.01.2020 passed by this Court-- In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that compliance of the order dated 29.10.2018 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit. Contempt--- This petition was disposed of vide order dated 29.10.2018 with direction to the respondents to award benefit of Office Memorandum dated 11.02.1985 to the petitioner, without discrimination, within a period of two months. Respondents assailed the aforesaid order before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petition No.1456-K of 2018, which was dismissed vide order dated 18.7.2019. Their review application was also dismissed vide order dated 24.12.2019. Now the respondents have complied with the order by depositing an amount of Rs.1, 208,000.00 with the Nazir of this Court and the same has been disbursed in favour of the petitioner, which factum is disclosed in the order dated 10.01.2020 passed by this Court-- In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons alluded above, we are satisfied with the explanation offered by the alleged contemnors that compliance of the order dated 29.10.2018 passed by this Court has been made in its letter and spirit. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1456-K/2018 The Secy: M/o Port & Shipping Now M/o Maritime Affairs and another v. Imtiaz Hussain Mohsin and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5154 Const. P. 389/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 Sabir Hussain (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.673-K/2018 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others,C.A.49-K/2019 Asif Hassan and others v. Sabir Hussain and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed,Disposed
5155 Const. P. 5871/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Allama Mousa and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.880-K/2018 M/s Sui Southern Gas Company Limited and another v. Allana Mousa and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5156 2019 PLC (CS) 962 Const. P. 1929/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Sikandar Ali Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1151-K/2018 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others,C.A.120-K/2019 Sikandar Ali Shah and others v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secy: and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
5157 Const. P. 931/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mansoor Pasha (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-MAR-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.515-K/2018 Mansoor Pasha v. Federation of Pakistan and another,C.A.27-K/2018 Mansoor Pasha v. Federation of Pakistan and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ Relist after summer vacation before a 3 Member Bench at Islamabad ],Disposed Dismissed
5158 Const. P. 3134/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Chairman and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JAN-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.521-K/2018 Chairman & others (Officer & Non-Officers) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Finance Revenue and others,C.A.19-K/2019 Chairman & others (Officer & Non-Officers) Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. Officers Association and others v. Federation of Pakistan thr. M/o Finance Revenue and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed.there is also a short order/CO by HCJ
5159 Const. P. 6009/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Ashraf Products (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5160 Const. P. 1106/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Zainab Bai & Ors (Petitioner) VS KMC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-18 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5161 Const. P. 4752/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Ghulam Sarwat Thaheem (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.94-K/2019 Province of Sindh thr. Secy: Board & University Deptt: Govt. of Sindh v. Ghulam Sarwar Thaheem Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5162 Const. P. 6092/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 M/s Good Luck Ind. (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5163 Const. P. 481/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s IBM (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3102/2018 M/s Institute of Business Management, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.92-K/2019 M/s Institute of Business Management, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Reource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
5164 Const. P. 1273/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2975/2018 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another,C.A.78-K/2019 M/s Ghani Glass Ltd, Karachi v. Government of Sindh thr. Secretary Labour & Human Resource Department, Karachi & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
5165 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5166 Const. P. 1388/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Umar Baqi and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.416-K/2017,C.P.3670/2019,C.P.2085/2020,C.P.2109/2020 SCP Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed for Non-Prosecution,Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5167 2022 SBLR Sindh 2164 Const. P. 8070/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Mir Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-SEP-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5168 Const. P. 4085/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Waseem Abbas & others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 13-DEC-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.116-K/2019 Waseem Abbas & others v. Province of Sindh thr. Secretary & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5169 Const. P. 2265/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Zia Ind (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 22-MAY-18 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3078/2018 M/s. Zia Industries (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others,C.A.84-K/2019 M/s. Zia Industries (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Government of Sindh, thr. Secretary, Labour & Human Resource Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Disposed Dismissed
5170 Cr.Bail 180/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2019 Waheed Dehpal Chandio (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5171 Const. P. 5447/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mazhar Ali Babar and Ors (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-AUG-19 Yes whether the Civil Servants can file a Writ Petition by invoking Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court in respect of the terms and conditions of his service when there is a bar contained in Article 212 of the Constitution? Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5172 Const. P. 5523/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Muhammad Iqbal Kazmi (Petitioner) VS Mayor Karachi and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.500-K/2019 Syed Muhammad Iqbal Kazmi v. Mayor of Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5173 Const. P. 5495/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Ismail Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-AUG-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5174 Const. P. 1897/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Munawar Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5175 Const. P. 862/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Abdul Jabbar Qureshi (Respondent) S.B. Order 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5176 Const. P. 3102/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Haseeb Malik & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5177 Const. P. 920/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Shaikh Nabi Bux (Petitioner) VS Mukhtiarkar Revenue Nagarparkar and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5178 Const. P. 635/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst. Bibi Sakeena and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5179 Const. P. 2995/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Akram Khan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5180 Const. P. 1937/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Arbab Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Deceased Quota Deceased Quota Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5181 Const. P. 3273/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5182 Const. P. 2868/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Abdul Mutlab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5183 Const. P. 2979/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Dost Muhammad & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5184 Const. P. 1122/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 ManzoorHussain& another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5185 Const. P. 131/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2014 Dr Shaista Shah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5186 Const. P. 1177/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Perviaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5187 Const. P. 2339/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sanaullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5188 Const. P. 87/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5189 Const. P. 1814/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Rana Sikandar Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5190 Const. P. 1925/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Aleem & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5191 Const. P. 1965/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Fazal-ur-Rehman (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ibrahim & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5192 Const. P. 2598/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Muhammad Haroon & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5193 Const. P. 572/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Syed Pir Naveed Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5194 Const. P. 3596/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Sayeda Kiran Batool (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5195 Const. P. 2295/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Yasir Arfat and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5196 Const. P. 3212/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Imam Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5197 Const. P. 3069/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Yousif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5198 Const. P. 3218/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Haneef and another (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5199 Const. P. 2304/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5200 Const. P. 3109/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Javed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5201 Const. P. 1449/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst, Nadia (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5202 Const. P. 2549/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dayal Chand (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5203 Const. P. 78/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Zahid Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5204 Const. P. 50/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Junaid Muzahir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5205 Const. P. 322/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Shaikh Rahim Rux (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5206 Const. P. 7140/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muzaffar Ali Chandio (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-19 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5207 Const. P. 4064/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Muhammad Yaseen Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-SEP-19 Yes NADRA Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5208 Const. P. 674/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Raza Mohammad Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-19 No We have also perused Section 12 of Police Act, 1861 which is claimed to empower the Inspector General to make rules regarding recruitment. We do not see any element to the extent of ???recruitment??? that could empower an Inspector General to frame rules. Section 12 of the ibid Act empowers Inspector General, of course with the approval of the provincial government, to frame orders and rules, as shall be deemed expedient relating to organization, classification and distribution of police force, the places at which the members of the force shall reside and the particular services to be performed by them. Their inspection, the description of arms accoutrements and other necessaries to be furnished to them, the collecting and communicating by them of intelligence information and all such other orders and rules relating to the police force as Inspector General from time to time deem expedient for preventing abuse or neglect of duty and for rendering such force efficient in discharge of duties. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5209 Const. P. 494/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Ali Mardan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5210 Const. P. 932/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sharfat Ali (Petitioner) VS Faiz Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-DEC-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5211 Const. P. 3540/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Abdul Sami (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5212 Const. P. 1390/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Noor Nabi (Petitioner) VS Abdul Ghafoor & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 18-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5213 Const. P. 3316/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shamim Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-SEP-19 Yes Petitioner has rendered 32 years??? service, however, the benefits as provided under clause 19 of the Resolution as discussed supra have been denied to him and no plausible reason has been assigned for withholding the same, for which the Petitioner cannot be held responsible. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5214 2021 PLC (CS) 374 Const. P. 1310/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Ms. Faryal Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Federal Ombudsman and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 17-SEP-19 Yes Posting and transfer of unmarried female government servants --In the light of Office Memorandum dated 17th December, 1999 as discussed supra the case of Petitioner explicitly falls within paragraph 2(i), as such Notification for transfer of the petitioner at Peshawar is declared against the policy decision of the Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat Establishment Division. Petition allowed. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5215 2021 PLC (CS) 51 Const. P. 679/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Ishaque (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-19 Yes whether the petitioner can be regularized in the Respondent-Department. We have noticed that the Petitioner has admitted that he accepted the contingent/work charged appointment--Petitioner's contingent/work charged service could not be converted into regular service--The Petitioner, in our view, has failed to make out his case for regularization of his work charged service as his case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant Petition is hereby dismissed along with pending application(s)---Before parting with this judgment, we may observe that that the petitioner has served from 1992 with some breaks but the fact of the matter is that he has a long service of more than two decades at his credit, therefore, it is not justified at the end of department after sucking the youth of petitioner and kicked him out on the pretext that his case does not fall in the aforesaid policy and that the post held by him being temporary and contingent/work charge paid, being not pensionable. Since the Petitioner is 58 years old and two years remaining to attain the age of superannuation, therefore, his services be continued till his date of superannuation. The salary issue of the Petitioner for the intervening period may be decided in accordance with the law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5216 Const. P. 2261/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Wagho (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5217 Const. P. 671/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5218 Const. P. 736/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mengho (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5219 Const. P. 1836/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Faraz Hussain Memon (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5220 Const. P. 2125/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Sher Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5221 Const. P. 349/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Adeel Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5222 Const. P. 969/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5223 Const. P. 702/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mst, Tasleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5224 II.A. 51/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nazeer Ahmed (Appellant) VS Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5225 Const. P. 3816/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Niaz Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-DEC-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.4105/2019,C.P.4144/2019,C.P.622-K/2019,C.P.4410/2019 SCP Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Disposed of
5226 Suit 1153/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2006 DR.HABIBUR REHMAN SOOMRO (Plaintiff) VS FED.OF PAK & ORS. (Defendant) S.B. Order 01-OCT-19 No In view of above discussion, by consent of the parties present in Court, prima-facie, this matter needs to be heard and decided by a learned Division Bench of this Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction in the light of paragraph No.158 of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch supra. Therefore the office is directed to place this case before a Division Bench of this Court for an appropriate order including the maintainability and other ancillary issues. The plaintiff is directed to file another set of pleadings accordingly. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5227 Const. P. 139/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Abdul Sattar and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5228 Const. P. 556/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Sadiq Hussain & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5229 II.A. 52/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Ali Asghar (Appellant) VS Additional District Judge, Sehwan & 07 others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 08-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5230 Const. P. 3437/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Syed Hussain Abbas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5231 Const. P. 3495/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Shahnawaz (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.817/2017 Abdullah v. National Accountability Bureau (NAB) thr. Its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5232 Const. P. 2143/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Inamullah Halepoto (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5233 Const. P. 2941/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5234 Const. P. 3808/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Nazeer Ahmed and others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5235 Const. P. 2075/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mureed Hussain & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5236 Const. P. 2644/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Abdul Ghafoor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5237 Const. P. 1946/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Liaqat Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5238 Const. P. 3057/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Mohammad Saleh &others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5239 Const. P. 5970/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Deewan Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-19 No Petitioner-Sugar Mill has been served with demand notice to deposit share of contribution u/s 12 (3) of EOBI Act, 1976, which notice issued in excess of authority and liable to be suspended. Stay granted with condition to pay said amount with the Nazir of this Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5240 Const. P. 1794/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Manzoor Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and another (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5241 Const. P. 32/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Azizullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5242 Const. P. 2835/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Baloch Khan (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5243 Const. P. 3369/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Barkat Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5244 Const. P. 1826/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Wasayo Samijo & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-DEC-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5245 Const. P. 2744/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ghayas (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5246 Const. P. 3718/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Bashir Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-NOV-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5247 I. A 16/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Syed Muhammad Nadeem Shah Bukhari (Appellant) VS Standard Chartered Bank (Pakistan) Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 14-NOV-19 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5248 Const. P. 19/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Sikandar Ali Malah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-OCT-20 Yes In view of the foregoing discussion, the competent authority of respondents is directed to issue a retirement order of the petitioner in BPS-17/18 under the law and to pay his full pensionary benefits, from the date of attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 31.12.2011 as admissible to him under the law within one month from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioners and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from 31.12.2011 to date. Petition and pending applications are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5249 Const. P. 6589/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ms. Mehreen Safdar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue in PSM Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1802/2020 M/s. Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Ltd thr. its CEO/Chairman v. Ms. Mehreen Safdar and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Withdrawn
5250 Const. P. 2622/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 P.I.A Senior Staff Association (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5251 Criminal Appeal 64/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sikandar Ali (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5252 Const. P. 6385/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Masood Ahmed Bhatti (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5253 Const. P. 6387/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Sohail Ahmed Hakro (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5254 Const. P. 790/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Atam Parkash Chanani (Petitioner) VS GOS & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-APR-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5255 Const. P. 5685/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Umair Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-APR-20 Yes The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. The petitioners have impugned the recruitment / examination process initiated by the Universities and Boards Department, Government of Sindh, for the posts of Secretary / Controller of Examination Sindh Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, inter-alia, on the ground that the examination process was compromised in order to accommodate the beneficiaries / private respondents, who were having influence and/or were selected for extraneous consideration--We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that recommendation of the Search Committee for appointment of unsuccessful candidates for the aforesaid posts and their subsequent appointments was without lawful authority. We direct the competent authority to hold a fresh interview for the subject posts of only successful candidates declared by IBA, and if the posts are leftover, the same shall be filled only through fresh advertisement on merits. All these petitions are allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.444-K/2020 The Province of Sindh through its Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister Sindh & others v. Syed Umair Ahmed & others,C.P.377-K/2020 Syed Umair Ahmed v. Province of Sindh & others,C.P.1838/2020 Imtiaz Ali Shah and others v. Syed Umair Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed,Disposed Dismissed
5256 II.A. 60/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: II.A S 58/2019 2019 Balach (Appellant) VS Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 25-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1271-K/2020 Balach Chandio v. Imtiaz-ul-Haq & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5257 Const. P. 2288/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5258 Const. P. 6787/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Prof: (R) Syed Anwar Ali & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-JAN-21 Yes University of Karachi--accommodation--Prima-facie the petitioner No.1 stood retired from the service of respondent-university on 06.10.2018 and after retirement, he was allowed to remain in possession up to 05.10.2019, therefore, no vested right can be claimed by them to retain the university accommodation for an indefinite period. Even otherwise, we are not satisfied with this assertion made by learned counsel for the petitioners to the effect that they are authorized residents of subject accommodation, which act on their part is not appreciated for the simple reason that to date no allotment order has been made in favour of petitioner No.2 who is stated to be an employee of respondent-university and it is for them to take appropriate decision if the petitioner No.2 is entitled to under the law. The documents relied upon by them do not confer any right thereupon permitting them to ask for the continuation of the allotment of subject premises. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5259 Const. P. 2097/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sarfaraz Akram (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-20 No He allegedly absented himself from duty for a continuous period of approximately fifty-one (51) days from 02.02.2020 giving rise to disciplinary proceedings which resulted in issuance of the impugned show cause notice dated 11.03.2020.--The main reason agitated that movement of more than one third of the planet's population has been restricted as such his movement is also restricted for not joining the disciplinary proceedings, appears to be genuine which requires consideration. Issue notice to the respondent as well as to learned DAG for 27.04.2020. He allegedly absented himself from duty for a continuous period of approximately fifty-one (51) days from 02.02.2020 giving rise to disciplinary proceedings which resulted in issuance of the impugned show cause notice dated 11.03.2020.--The main reason agitated that movement of more than one third of the planet's population has been restricted as such his movement is also restricted for not joining the disciplinary proceedings, appears to be genuine which requires consideration. Issue notice to the respondent as well as to learned DAG for 27.04.2020. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5260 2023 PCr.LJ Note 21 Cr.Bail 26/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Haji Muhammad Siddique khokhar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
5261 Const. P. 3234/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Dr Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5262 Civil Revision 184/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Bashir Ahmed (Applicant) VS Masood (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5263 Const. P. 2593/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Afsheen Sajid (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5264 Const. P. 8063/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Hafiz Muhammad Tabish (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-DEC-20 Yes we are of the considered view that merely obtaining acquittal from a criminal case is no ground to take benefit to bypass the disciplinary proceedings. Since the show cause was issued against the petitioner and he replied and it is for the respondent-KPT to decide in accordance with law for which this Court is not required to show indulgence in the matter under Article 199 of the Constitution to set-aside the disciplinary proceedings initiated against him--we do not see any infringement of the right of the Petitioner which could be called in question by way of Writ Petition. It is a well-settled principle of law that a public Servant has no vested right to call in question the disciplinary proceedings in Writ Petition. During the course of arguments, we have been informed that petitioners service has been dispensed with under the disciplinary proceedings. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5265 Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-20 No With the consent of learned counsel for the parties and learned AAG Sindh, the petition and listed applications stand disposed of in the above terms and with the above directions with no order as to costs. Office is directed to issue notice to respondents 1 and 2 for compliance of this order in letter and spirit. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5266 Const. P. 2250/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ali Asghar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-20 Yes the private respondents are Assistant Food Controller in BPS-15, but they are holding the post of District Food Controller in BPS-16 in various districts of the Province of Sindh on Own Pay Scale (OPS) in violation of Article 199---Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. At the request of learned counsel, office is directed to issue cover-in-hand to him in respect of the notice to be issued to respondents 1 and 2 who shall also be served through courier service. To come up on 29.04.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5267 Const. P. 2429/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-20 No Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Respondent No.2 / Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh is directed to appear before this Court in person on the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned notification to the extent of the present petitioner shall remain suspended. To come up on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 am along with C.P. No.D-2387/2020. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5268 Const. P. 2094/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Syed Akram Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 16-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5269 Const. P. 5585/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mst. Fakhar un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5270 Const. P. 5603/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Hassan Azhar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Steel Mills Corp and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5271 Const. P. 154/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Dr. Itefaq Hussain (Petitioner) VS Ayoub Qureshi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-19 No The aforesaid order was merged in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, however, the findings of learned Rent Controller that there is no relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and disposed of Rent Application being infructuous. Prima-facie, the aforesaid findings explicitly suggest that he has taken the decision in the light of order passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court; therefore, the applicant ought to have availed the remedy as provided under Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 and not before this Court, in a disposed of matter. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.48-K/2020 Dr. Itefaq Hussain v. Ayoub Qureshi and others,C.A.20-K/2021 Dr. Itefaq Hussain v. Ayoub Qureshi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted ,Pending
5272 Const. P. 85/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.738-K/2022 Aziz Khan & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session -- Before 3 HJJ ]
5273 Const. P. 4483/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corp Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5274 Const. P. 4491/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Hidayatullah Amiri & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAR-20 No We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. We are not at all impressed with the above proposal as post-retirement benefits of the petitioners, which is their unalienable fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of lack of funds or on any other ground whatsoever, especially when the same is their only source of income after retirement. However, before ordering attachment of the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government in terms of order dated 04.02.2020, we deem it appropriate to grant last and final opportunity to the Federal Government and PSM to settle all the dues of the petitioners, subject to the condition that payments shall be made to them by the Federal Government in terms of the above-quoted statement without fail latest by 15.05.2020. It is clarified that if the commitment / assurance / undertaking mentioned in the above-quoted statement is not honoured by the Federal Government in letter and spirit, the account(s) / fund(s) of the Federal Government shall be attached forthwith for settlement of the dues of the petitioners. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5275 Const. P. 2325/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Azeem & others (Petitioner) VS Rehmatullah & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5276 Const. P. 7563/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Irshad Ahmed Siyal and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-20 Yes Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Health Department, Government of Sindh--It is well settled now that regularization of the services of the petitioners on the premise that regularization is always subject to availability of post and fulfillment of recruitment criteria, apparently the petitioners have not initially been appointed in an open and transparent manner through the prescribed competitive process as the vacancies were not advertised in the newspaper. Besides it is well-settled law that a contract employee is debarred from approaching this Court in constitutional jurisdiction, in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Qazi Munir Ahmed versus Rawalpindi Medical College and Allied Hospital and others, 2019 SCMR 648---Before parting with this order, we may observe that the Provincial Cabinet is well within its powers to frame policy, however, subject to law. It is well-settled that if a policy manifestly inconsistent with the Constitutional commands, retrogressive in nature, and discriminatory inter se the populace is not immune from judicial review. Prima-facie the decision of the Cabinet dated 29.3.2018 does not cover the case of the petitioners under Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, as their appointment is after promulgation of the said Act i.e. 25.3.2013--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.289-K/2020 Irshad Ahmed Siyal & others v. Province of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
5277 Const. P. 2509/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rasheed Rizvi Centre & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAY-20 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5278 Civil Revision 188/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Ramzan (Applicant) VS Masood Ahmed (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5279 Const. P. 720/2011 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2011 Akbar Allauddin & another (Petitioner) VS District Judge Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1274-K/2020 Akbar Allauddin & another v. The District Judge Hyderabad Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5280 Const. P. 2372/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5281 Const. P. 6046/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Mustafa Daudpota (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-20 Yes The disciplinary matters fall within the expression ???terms and conditions of service??? which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. The disciplinary matters fall within the expression terms and conditions of service which in this case are non-statutory rules of service. Hence, the same cannot be called into question within the ambit of constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Our view is supported by the latest decision rendered by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Maj. (R) Syed Muhammad Tanveer Abbas and other connected Appeals , 2019 SCMR 984. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3452/2020 Ghulam Murtaza Daudpoto v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5282 Const. P. 5723/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-20 Yes water tankers / business--it is the basic duty of the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board to supply water to the citizens of Karachi. When Karachi Water & Sewerage Board was / is unable to meet the water needs of the city of Karachi, a water tanker mafia had sprung up in Karachi. During the argument, we have been informed that there is certain direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court for the closing of illegal hydrants from Karachi city. Prima-facie, the Management of KW&SB has failed to remove illegal hydrants operating in the city despite Honorable Supreme Court directions. Moreover, the Honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan had directed the Management of KW&SB to focus upon their core operations to provide portable water via a regular distribution network. Even, if hydrants are needed, there should be a rational and scientific study to evaluate the need for hydrant services in water-scarce areas. The hydrant services preferably should supply water to improvised population. On the aforesaid proposition, this Court has already settled the issue in the case of Muhammad Rafique Sia vs Province of Sindh and others, 2016 CLC 170. Besides that, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in HRC No.28963/2014 directed the respondents to take action against illegal and unauthorized hydrants--Dismissed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5283 Criminal Appeal 52/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Meer Muhammad Umer (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5284 Const. P. 361/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Nadeem Ahmed Khan &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.735-K/2022 Nadeem Ahmed Khan & another v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned [ Next Session -- Before 3 HJJ ]
5285 2019 PLC (CS) 1533 Const. P. 4997/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammad Azam Channa (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-AUG-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5286 Const. P. 5695/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zulfiqar Ali (Petitioner) VS Pakistan Post and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-DEC-20 No In the above circumstances, respondents are directed to pay the entire outstanding commutation amount to the petitioner as well as the amount deducted from his pension on account of rent. The above exercise shall be completed without fail within sixty (60) days and compliance report in terms of this order shall be filed by the respondents within ten (10) days thereafter through MIT-II of this Court. The petition is allowed in the above terms with no order as to costs. Listed application stands disposed of accordingly. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5287 Const. P. 2151/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5288 Const. P. 3366/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Qurban Ali (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pak and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5289 Const. P. 1400/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Noor ul Arfeen Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-20 No Prima-facie the Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013 does not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case of the petitioners, as the aforesaid Act of 2013 is relevant for those employees, who held the posts in Government of Sindh Departments which includes the post in a Project of such Department in connection with the affairs of the Province also excluding the employees appointed on contingent / daily wages basis and under the aforesaid Act 2013 the contingent service of the petitioners cannot be converted into regular service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5290 Const. P. 96/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Rozina & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.203-K/2024 Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others v. Mst. Munwar Khatoon Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
5291 Const. P. 5988/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Syed Abdul Qayyum and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5292 Const. P. 803/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 ALI HYDER (Petitioner) VS P.O SINDH & OTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5293 Const. P. 4789/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Khizar Hayat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-20 Yes whether the petitioner can challenge the show cause notice issued against him and his suspension order in a Constitution Petition?--We are clear in mind that pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, a final decision against the petitioner has yet to be taken by the respondent- Police Department and he has to overcome the clog of pendency of disciplinary proceedings against him, if not finalized earlier; the said proceedings shall be finalized within two months from the date of the decision of this Court. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5294 Const. P. 788/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Sher and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-JAN-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5295 Const. P. 381/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Hyderabad Railway Cantt: Housing Society (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5296 Const. P. 4531/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5297 Const. P. 3320/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5298 Const. P. 3160/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Irshad Ali (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other\ (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5299 Const. P. 359/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Annwar & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5300 Const. P. 3266/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Ghulam Sarwar (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5301 Criminal Appeal 106/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Abdul Latif (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5302 2022 PLC (CS) Note 6 Const. P. 1970/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Dr. Gulshan Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-SEP-20 Yes In the captioned Petition bearing No.D-1970 of 2019, the only issue involved is the issuance of two Corrigendum dated 11.03.2019 & 16.6.2019 respectively relating to advertisement . The Petitioner has assailed the legality of the above-specified Corrigendum whereby Respondent-Board changed the academic qualification of candidates as well as the upper age limit from 62 to 65 years for the post of Vice-Chancellor of Peoples University . We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the Search Committee to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor PUMHSW, Shaheed Benazirabad in pursuance of corrigendum as discussed supra was without lawful authority and awarding marks to the candidates by the Search Committee is also held to be against the clear command of the Honorable Supreme Court in the cases discussed in the preceding paragraph. Accordingly, we direct the Search Committee /competent authority to hold a fresh interview of the shortlisted candidates made before the issuance of corrigendum and make recommendation to the competent authority for the appointment of Vice-Chancellor, PUMHSW, petitions are disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Omar Sial, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2553/2020 Prof. Dr. Shamsuddin Shaikh v. Province of Sindh thr. Chief Secretary, Sindh Secretariate, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5303 Const. P. 1767/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 HBL (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5304 Const. P. 7090/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Atam Parkash Chanani & Another (Petitioner) VS Govt. Of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5305 Const. P. 2387/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Allah Dino and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 05-MAY-20 No Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. Respondent No.2 / Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh is directed to appear before this Court in person on the next date of hearing. Till the next date of hearing, operation of the impugned notification to the extent of the present eight (08) petitioners shall remain suspended. To come up on 14.05.2020 at 11:00 am. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5306 Const. P. 2387/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Allah Dino and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-20 No Matters pertaining to Board of Revenue Sindh. By consent all these petitions and listed applications are disposed of with no order as to costs in terms of the above undertaking given by the Senior Member Board of Revenue Sindh ; and, as agreed by the parties, the impugned Notification shall remain suspended to the extent of the present petitioners till the final decision / order of the competent authority of the Board of Revenue Sindh on the representations filed by the petitioners. Needless to say any person aggrieved by the order / decision of the competent authority will seek his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5307 Const. P. 8056/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Saddam Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-JAN-21 No Differently abled persons Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.A.82-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others,C.P.745-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others v. Saddam Hussain & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed ,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed
5308 Const. P. 1158/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rehan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Chairman FBR and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5309 Const. P. 3551/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Khan Habib Afridi & 2070 Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5310 Criminal Appeal 38/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Karim Bukhsh and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 12-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5311 Const. P. 6435/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Danish Sidat (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-21 Yes withholding the appointment of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (BPS-09) on the ground of pending criminal case--with directions to the competent authority / Inspector General of Police, Sindh to scrutinize the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector (BPS-09) and if the petitioner is found fit in all respects to be admitted as Assistant Sub-Inspector in Sindh Police, his candidature may be processed for the appointment strictly under the Recruitment Rules for the aforesaid post within one month from the date of communication of this order and submit compliance report through MIT-II of this Court. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5312 Const. P. 8908/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 M/s Pakistan Television Crop Ltd (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Habib Ahmed and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-FEB-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.2836/2021 M/s Pakistan Television Corporation Limited thr. Muhammad Atif, Senior Personnel Officer, Karachi v. Muhammad Habib Ahmed Khan and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5313 Const. P. 6031/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Muhammads Ayub (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-21 Yes appointment against son quota Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.427-K/2021 Ayub Khan v. The Learned Member & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
5314 Const. P. 2115/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5315 Const. P. 3405/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Nazim Inayat (Petitioner) VS National Command & Authority (NCA) and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5316 Const. P. 2735/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Liaquat Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5317 Const. P. 5644/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Mst. Zain un Nisa (Petitioner) VS PTCL and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-NOV-20 Yes retired employees / family members of deceased employee of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (???PTCL???) and claiming a certain amount of contribution on account of Employees Old-Age Benefits--The petitioners are claiming the pensionary benefits under the EOB Act, 1976. We have to see whether petitioners were paid full-service benefits under the VSS scheme introduced by respondent-company in 2008 or are entitled to the issuance of EOBI Cards?--Adverting to the point raised by the petitioners that the respondent-PTCL deposited the requisite contribution with EOBI as such they are entitled to the benefits. We do not agree with the aforesaid proposition for the reason that the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of PTCL as discussed supra directed the respondent-PTCL to pay such contribution under the provision of Employees??? Old-Age Benefits Act, 1976, and as per the statement of the respondent-PTCL such demand of respondent No.2 was fully satisfied from the relevant period, whereas petitioners during their tenure of service never contributed such EOBI amount to respondent No.2 for payment before their voluntarily retirement. However, we may observe that if the petitioners would not have opted for VSS Scheme, the position of the case would have been different for the simple reason that after their option of VSS, they are estopped to claim such benefits---Dismissed. VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5318 Const. P. 8515/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sophia Ibrahim & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-FEB-21 Yes regularization--Benazir Bhutto Shaheed Human Resource Research Department Board--Since learned counsel for the respondent No.2 agreed to look into the matter of petitioners for regularization of their services in the respondent-department under the law; and, on the aforesaid analogy as set forth by the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Board of Intermediate and Secretary Education, Faisalabad (supra) within a reasonable time. Learned counsel for the petitioners has agreed for the candid proposal of learned counsel for the respondent No.2, however without prejudice to the rights of the petitioners involved in the present proceedings. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5319 Criminal Appeal 105/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Wahid Bux (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5320 Const. P. 438/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Dheraj @ Wanio (Petitioner) VS Sht. Surma & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5321 Const. P. 594/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst Bashiran Jagirani & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
5322 Const. P. 94/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Niaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-AUG-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5323 Cr.Acq.A. 117/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Sher Muhammad Jogi (Appellant) VS Liaquat Ali and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 24-SEP-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5324 Const. P. 2797/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mohammad Rashid (Petitioner) VS Federation Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-20 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1332-K/2020 Muhammad Rashid Bhatti v. Federation of Pakistan & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5325 Const. P. 6535/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Rifaqat Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS PTCL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-NOV-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5326 Const. P. 6236/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Raza Muhammad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-DEC-20 Yes The petitioners, in our view, have failed to make out their case for regularization of their service as their case is neither covered under Section 3 of Sindh (Regularization of Ad-hoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013, nor falls within the ambit of Policy of Government of Sindh, therefore, the instant petition is hereby dismissed in limine along with the pending application(s) with no order as to costs. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5327 Const. P. 3543/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sadaqat Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-FEB-20 Yes Regularization issue of project employees Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5328 Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-NOV-20 Yes Contempt proceedings--The explanation offered by the respondents, prima-facie, is tenable under the law as the petitioner was considered for the promotion in DPC in compliance of the order passed by this Court on 12.05.2020. It is noted that the representative of SGA&CD opined for deferment of the promotion of the petitioner and consideration of his case after finalization of the proceedings against him, in our view, this is the correct approach. Prima-facie such decision of the DPC to clear him for promotion during the pendency of criminal proceedings is erroneous. However, his deferment shall be subject to the outcome of the criminal proceedings presently pending against him. This view is fortified by the decision rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Mst. Ifat Nazir vs. Government of Punjab and others, 2009 SCMR 703. It is well-settled law that in case of promotion vested / fundamental rights cannot be claimed. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5329 Const. P. 2318/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Ahsan Ali Chohan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-APR-20 Yes Issue notice to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh with direction to file comments before the next date of hearing. As an interim measure, respondents are directed to consider the case of the present petitioner for promotion strictly on merits and in accordance with law. In case, his case is deferred and/or rejected, the competent authority shall pass a speaking order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. To be listed on 07.05.2020 at 11:00 a.m. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5330 Const. P. 659/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Mst. Parri (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
5331 Const. P. 979/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: C.P D 983,993,998/2020 2020 Abdul Azeem Khan (Petitioner) VS The State & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.3633/2020 Chairman National Accountability Bureau through Prosecutor General Accountability, NAB Headquarters, Islamabad v. Abdul Azeem Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5332 Const. P. 4907/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fareed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-20 Yes The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Hon???ble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Messrs State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181), in which the workers employed by the third-party contractor were held to be the workers of the company--Reverting to the third point that there is no specific provision for the award of compensation in the Industrial Relations Act/Ordinance, we do not agree with the aforesaid assertion for the simple reason that the learned SLAT has dealt with this issue at pargraphs11 and 12 of the impugned common judgment dated 16.01.2020 and assigned valid reasons to award a reasonable compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the private respondents as full and final payment for severance of their employment relationship with the petitioner-company--Dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5333 Const. P. 2387/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5334 Civil Revision 174/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Azizullah and others (Applicant) VS Zulifqar Ali and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-OCT-20 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5335 Const. P. 2474/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Party 1 (Petitioner) VS Party 2 (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5336 Const. P. 1006/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2017 Haji Dad Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Secretary Irrigation Karachi and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JUL-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed
5337 Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5338 Const. P. 4287/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sahib Khan Lund Baloch (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-APR-21 Yes Petitioner, who is serving at present as Assistant Commissioner in BPS-17, is aggrieved by the purported decision of the Provincial Selection Board-II (`PSB-II`) dated 09.3.2020 and 11.3.2020, whereby his promotion to the post of Deputy Secretary (Equivalent BPS-18) was deferred on the ground that his Annual Confidential Reports (`ACRs`) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5339 Const. P. 1253/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Sadam Hussain & Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1382/2021,C.P.5125/2021,C.P.1085-K/2022,C.A.3989/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
5340 Const. P. 427/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Farooq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-21 Yes In our view, no candidate shall be appointed to a post unless after such medical examination as Government may prescribe such candidate is found medically fit to discharge the duties of the post. In the present case, the petitioner was relieved from the duties on medical grounds and his appeal was rejected on the same analogy. Besides above, the assertion of the petitioner is misconceived on the premise that he obtained a medical examination fitness test certificate on 02.12.2019 after the rejection of his appeal, on 14.5.2019, thus this document could not be taken into consideration, besides the respondents have relied upon the documents which prima facie show adverse inference against him. Thus, at this stage, we cannot declare him medically fit or otherwise for the subject post, which was a contractual position and by efflux of time expired. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5341 Const. P. 2232/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Soorty Enterprises (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakisan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No contribution EOBI as after 18th Amendment Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5342 Const. P. 1929/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ghulam Mustafa Noonari (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-MAR-21 Yes Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5343 Const. P. 3502/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-JUN-21 Yes We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and falls within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of the civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973 read with Article 212(2) of the Constitution. On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified with the decision rendered by the Honble Supreme court in the case of Ali Azhar Khan Baloch vs. Province of Sindh [2015 SCMR 456] Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5344 Const. P. 2154/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Anwar Textile Mills (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5345 Const. P. 8437/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mushtaq Iqbal Khan (Petitioner) VS The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1912/2020 Chairman NAB thr. PG NAB, Islamabad v. Mushtaq Iqbal Khan Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
5346 Const. P. 5830/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Khalique Kaloi (Petitioner) VS NBP & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5347 Const. P. 1932/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Irfan Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5348 Const. P. 4902/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Zaiba Anjum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5349 Const. P. 5027/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Mushk Mona Ayaz (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1392/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Mushk Mona Aya and others,C.P.5135/2021 Sui Southern Gas Company Limited Karachi v. Mushk Mona Aya and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months
5350 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 555/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5351 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 558/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5352 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 566/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5353 Const. P. 6025/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Tulsi Das (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5354 Const. P. 4788/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Syed Khawaja Najeebullah (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2747/2022 Syed Khawaja Najeeb Ullah v. Sindh Emplyees Social Security Institution through its Commissioner, Karachi Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5355 Cr.Bail 1737/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD KHAN KHOSO S/O KHAN MUHAMMAD KHOSO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-SEP-21 Yes Post-arrest bail--it appears that the applicant is Head Constable in Police Department and is bound to prevent the offenses in the area concerned; and, if he, from his acts or omissions, allows happening of the offense (s), or commits the offense, by escorting the vehicle, whereby he facilitated the co-accused to transport, the theft oil, thereby he breaches his official duties/obligations. The applicant, prima facie appears to be linked with the alleged offense of theft of a huge quantity of diesel oil, by allowing co-accused to tamper with the main Petroleum Pipe Line of PARCO-- Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5356 Const. P. 4685/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Azhar Hussain Solangi and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5357 Const. P. 3314/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Zeba Hassan and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5358 Const. P. 4271/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Akram Basheer and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.750-K/2021,C.P.751-K/2021,C.A.34-K/2021,C.A.35-K/2021 SCP Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ]
5359 Const. P. 5995/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Tayyab (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.753-K/2021 Muhammad Tayyab v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others,C.A.37-K/2021 Muhammad Tayyab v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted [ C.As be fixed after three months ],Disposed Allowed and Remanded [ Short Order by Mr. Mudassar ]
5360 Const. P. 317/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shoukatullah (Petitioner) VS The State through Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5361 Const. P. 6780/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 M/s Century Engineering Ind Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5362 Const. P. 6181/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Ali Isani (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5363 Const. P. 4048/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2012 M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-OCT-21 Yes We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by the petitioners was sketchy, one-sided, non-transparent, and not supported even by the law. We, therefore, find that both the Learned SLC and SLAT were justified in passing the impugned orders and recorded valid and cogent reasons for doing so, therefore, no ground existed for re-evaluation of the evidence, thus, we maintain the consolidated order dated 22.10.2011 passed by the Sindh Labour Court (SLC) in grievance Applications of the private respondents and common order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the learned Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal (SLAT) in Appeal No. KAR-273/2011, Appeal Nos. KAR-445/2011 to KAR 496/2011 and KAR-498/2011 to KAR-603/2011. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.6488/2021 M/s Dalda Foods (Pvt) Limited v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi & others,C.P.5640/2021 M/s Haq Engineering & Packing Service (Pvt) Limited, Karachi v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal, Karachi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned,Pending Adjourned
5364 Const. P. 4777/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Naurus (Pvt) Ltd and Others (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5365 Const. P. 269/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Arif Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-JUN-21 Yes Through this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the respondents be directed to issue notification in respect of his retirement and to pay his post-retirement benefits and outstanding salary. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.1541-K/2021 The Province of Sindh through its Secretary, Local Government Department & another v. Muhammad Arif Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5366 2021 CLD 1008 H.C.A 284/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Famous Brands (Private) Limited (Appellant) VS Samsonite IP Holdings S.A.R.L & another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAR-21 Yes By moving an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant does not surrender to the jurisdiction of the Court. The jurisdiction is conferred by law based on facts. A litigant may be right or wrong in asserting that the Court had no jurisdiction or that the suit is barred by law. But, this act of litigant would neither confer and/or bestow nor take away any jurisdiction which in fact is conferred by law. Actions of parties prior to litigation leads to constitution of a cause to initiate proceedings in Court of competent jurisdiction. - If the two applications were not moved simultaneously and would have been filed one after the other, will a litigant still be debarred from filing the other application such as Order VII Rule 10 CPC.A simple answer to this proposition is No as rejection of plaint has its own reasons whereas return of plaint has its own. In an application under order VII rule 11 a litigant has only to show that it does not disclose a cause of action; the relief claimed is undervalued or is not properly valued and that the suit appears to be barred by law. None of these rational is available while entertaining an application under order VII rule 10 CPC, which is for return of plaint on numerous counts including but not limited to pecuniary jurisdiction and territorial jurisdiction. Courts when plaint is presented are required to see whether they are bestowed with pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction whereas under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Courts are required to see whether it is barred by law. The Court had to apply law to decide the issue of jurisdiction; it is the law that confers or takes away the jurisdiction of the Court and not based on moving of application under the aforesaid provision of law. Another proposition is that while entertaining and hearing application under order VII rule 11 CPC Court is empowered to return the plaint if the circumstances so warrants as required under the law. -Section 86(3) of the Trademark Ordinance, 2001 provides that owner of the trademark which is entitled to protection under the Paris Convention as a well-known trademark shall be entitled to restrain by injunction the use in Pakistan of a trademark which, or the essential part of which, is identical or deceptively similar to the well-known trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services, where the use is likely to cause confusion or where such use cause dilution of the distinctive quality of the well-known trademark. - At the very outset there is nothing in the instant case which could attract Section 81 of Trademark Ordinance, 2001. The proprietor of the mark never gave up their right or it has not been demonstrated that for continuous period of five years from the date of alleged registration (in favour of user) in the use of registered mark in Pakistan, the proprietor was aware of it and that the proprietor ceased to be entitled on the basis of that earlier trademark or other rights. The engagement of the appellant with the respondent itself is enough to understand that there was no case of acquiescence at all. In fact the appellant conceded when they assumed the role of a distributor. -The appellate Court normally avoid interfering in the orders of the interlocutory nature involving exercise of discretion as the appellate Court cannot substitute its own discretion unless when the discretion has been exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, perversely or where the Court has ignored certain principles regulating grant or refusal of injunction. The appellate Court is not required to reassess the material to reach a conclusion different from the one reached by the trial Court/learned Single Judge on the consideration that another view is possible. Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.4034/2021 Famous Brands (Private) Limited, Lahore v. Samsonite IP Holdings S.a.r.l., Luxembourg through its Attorney Abdul Rasheed, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5367 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 554/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5368 Const. P. 723/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Allah Bachayo & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of SIndh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 Yes Secretary Schools shall also ensure that close schools are re-started by providing all facilities in the area of Union Council Bijora, Taluka Sujawal, District Sujawal. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5369 Const. P. 6116/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sajjad Ahmed Sarki (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5370 Const. P. 3288/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Syed Muhammad Shah and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5371 2022 PLC (CS) 235 Const. P. 3271/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bilqees (Petitioner) VS The Sect: Wafaqi Mohtasib and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-MAR-21 Yes whether Wafaqi Mohtasib is competent to absorb any deputationist by appointing her/him by transfer in the Establishment of the Wafaqi Mohtasib, Islamabad? Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1164/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others,C.A.1349/2021 Ms. Shahina Ahmed v. Bilqess and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.status quo be maintained.to be fixed after 3 months,Pending
5372 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 565/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5373 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 553/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5374 Const. P. 249/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Pak Cotton Ginning Pressing (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5375 Const. P. 3657/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Icon Constultants (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5376 Const. P. 4816/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Hubdar Ali Khaki (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5377 2023 PLC CS 228 Const. P. 6221/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Asif Ali Memon (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5378 Const. P. 2798/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Shaheen (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5379 Const. P. 3428/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Hakim Ali Khokhar and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1387/2021,C.P.5130/2021,C.P.1095-K/2022,C.A.3994/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
5380 Const. P. 4015/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Asif Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAY-21 No ............We fully agree with the contention of M/s Malik Naeem Iqbal, Saleem Khaskheli, Syed Shoa-un-Nabi, Muhammad Khan Lakho, Ms. Shazia Zafar, Muzafar Ali, Samiullah Soomro, Aamer Latif and Tariq Ahmed Memon, advocates that the issue involved in the instant petitions stand squarely covered by the decision of the High Court and the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan. For ready reference Paragraph No.22 of the decision dated 30.09.2019, given in C.P No.D-5649/2018, is reproduced herein below:- 22. In the light of facts and circumstances of the case discussed above and decisions rendered by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the aforesaid cases, the instant petition is hereby disposed of with direction to the Managing Director/Competent Authority of Respondent-Company to consider case of the petitioners for regularization of their service, more particularly in the same analogy as decided by the Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Messrs. State Oil Company Limited vs. Bakht Siddique and others ( 2018 SCMR1181). The aforesaid exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment and compliance report be submitted through MIT-II of this Court. We, therefore, dispose of all the petitions in view of the paragraph as noted above, however, we would like to clarify that our this order would not be applicable to those persons / petitioners who are neither the temporary employees of SSGC nor are being paid/hired via the contractors. Compliance report in respect of the above order ought to be submitted through MIT-II of this Court within three (03) months time. With these observations all the instant petitions stand disposed of. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.A.1389/2021,C.P.5132/2021,C.P.1082-K/2022,C.A.3986/2022 SCP Disposed Allowed and Remanded,Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
5381 Const. P. 4434/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Manzoor Shah (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-OCT-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5382 Const. P. 6169/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Muhammad Adil (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5383 Const. P. 162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-SEP-21 Yes We in the aforesaid circumstances hold that the recommendation of the respondent-university as well suggestion of Secretary Universities and Board to the competent authority for the appointment of Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University as discussed supra was without lawful authority; and, we do not appreciate the conduct of the respondents in the manner they have dealt with the matter of appointment of the Dean Faculty of Science in Karachi University, in bypassing the senior professor working in grade 22 and got recommended the private respondents for the said position in violation of the principle of natural justice and seniority, which is a universal principle. It is well-settled law that if a civil/public servant is appointed in violation of any provision of law, the competent authority can look into the matter---Coming to the next point that interest of the petitioner is also being agitated in the petition, suffice it to say when we have found that every action of the respondents dubious to propose the competent authority, the names of the shortlisted candidates, in a cursory manner, thus prima facie the competent authority was not properly appraised on the subject issue, therefore, the matter needs to be looked into by the competent authority afresh, keeping in view the seniority-cum merit principle as law laid down by the Honorable Supreme Court on the subject and take a fresh decision to appoint Dean of Faculty of Science of respondent-university. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1547-K/2021 Dr.Nasira Khatoon v. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5384 Const. P. 162/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi (Petitioner) VS The Chief Sect: and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1547-K/2021 Dr.Nasira Khatoon v. Syed Jamil Hussain Kazmi & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5385 Const. P. 1783/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noshasba Talat (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5386 Const. P. 580/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Syed Mansoob Ahmed Khatri and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-AUG-21 Yes principally the petitioners are seeking inclusion of `Orderly Allowance` in their pensionable emoluments in the light of Amendment No.19 in clause/regulation 46 of Chapter IV (Emoluments) of Civil Aviation Service Regulation-2014 (CSR-2014) and the decision of 179th meeting held on 1.8.2019 by Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (PCAA) Board Secretariat---Accordingly, while following the principle of law enunciated in I.A. Sherwani's case (ibid), and in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case while invoking the jurisdiction conferred upon this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, we hereby declare the impugned decision /action/order of the Respondent-CAA is in negation to the strict and prohibitory command contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, because the Petitioners have been treated with sheer discrimination, which cannot be approved on any premises whatsoever. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2285/2022 Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority through Director General, Karachi v. Syed Mansoob Ahmed Bukhari and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5387 Cr.Bail 284/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Asghar Khan son of Abdul Manan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-21 No The Sindh Prohibition of Preparation, Manufacturing, Storage, Sale and Use of Gutka and Manpuri Act 2019 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5388 Const. P. 338/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Shahbaz Ali (Petitioner) VS Zakir Hussain Sandano SHO PS Behram (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-AUG-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5389 Const. P. 2628/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Rashid Ejaz (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5390 Const. P. 2410/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdul Basit (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-APR-21 Yes promotion issue Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5391 Const. P. 5250/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shoaib Ahmed Malik (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Admittedly, impugned Show Cause Notice has been issued by the Secretary/Authority Government of Pakistan Cabinet Secretariat Establishment Division at Islamabad. It is also not disputed that petitioners parent department is Cabinet Division at Islamabad and he has challenged repatriation and Government of Sindh is accommodated him as Administrator District East. Since petitioner has remedy to approach Islamabad High Court as impugned notice/letter is based in Islamabad and petitioners initial appointment also pertains to Islamabad Cabinet Division. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5392 Const. P. 332/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rehan Ali (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5393 Const. P. 332/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Rehan Ali (Petitioner) VS SESSI (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Claims, and counter-claims of the parties are disputed questions of facts, which cannot be adjudicated by High Court while exercising the Constitutional Jurisdiction, therefore, on the aforesaid plea, the petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be adjudicated under Article 199 of the Constitution. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5394 Const. P. 1427/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Muhammad Rafiq (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 Yes seeking appointment as Primary School Teacher (PST) on the premise that he secured 94 marks in National Testing Service (NTS) test and his credentials were duly verified by the competent authority--we are not in a position to say for and against the documents attached with the memo of the petition and on this scope alone this petition fails on the ground of disputed question of facts. No case is made out for interfering with the impugned order dated 21.3.2017 passed by Director School Education (Primary) Sukkur Region, Sukkur (Chairman DRC Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1057-K/2021 Muhammad Rafique v. The Province of Sindh through Secretary, Education and literacy Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5395 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 569/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS Haji Abdul Raziq Khan & Bros & another (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-APR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5396 Const. P. 6238/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Huzaifa Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5397 Const. P. 2573/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syed Mahmood Akhtar Naqvi (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5398 Const. P. 6462/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Muhammad Najam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-21 Yes deceased quota Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5399 Const. P. 1414/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Ahemd Kaleem Usmani and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 19-MAY-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5400 Cr.Bail 252/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ahmed Ali @ Ali Bhutto and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5401 Const. P. 5549/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Prof: Dr. Muhammad Zahid (Petitioner) VS Fed: Urdu Uni of Arts & Science and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No whether the directives contained in paragraph 10 of the order dated 28.04.2021 passed by this Court in CP No.D-5205/2020 has been adhered to in its letter and spirit or otherwise Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5402 Const. P. 4356/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Arshad Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-21 Yes Without prejudice to above, since there is consent order, no review was preferred even that order was not assailed. In case, if there was no deduction by the department and they were sending salary directly to the account; that is not justification to withhold group insurance. Accordingly, Secretary Health, Government of Sindh shall ensure that group insurance amount is paid as per her entitlement to the nominee without any delay. While parting this order, learned AG Sindh shall ensure presence of any focal person of Accountant General Sindh (A.G. Sindh) to assist this Court that under what capacity complete salary was transferred and they failed to deduct the amount and who were responsible with regard to such irregularity, if any. This exercise shall be completed within 15 days. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5403 Const. P. 3106/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Uzma Faheem (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-SEP-21 No Such commitment is on record hence transfer of incharge of an established covid-ward to RHC, Gadap and subsequent show cause notice compelling the petitioner to cause her appearance with Incharge Covid is unjustified rather appearing to be in conflict with such commitment / suggestion. However, we will examine the case on merits at later stage. Till covid issue is at rise petitioner shall not be transferred from Services Hospital as Incharge Covid; impugned notification with regard to transfer of the petitioner as well show cause notice are suspended till next date of hearing. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5404 Const. P. 4050/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFL (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-AUG-21 No Let detail statement tabulating the sums be submitted by the petitioners with the Nazir of this Court, within six weeks, showing amount duly payable to EOBI Sindh. In the meanwhile, operation of the impugned notice dated 10.07.2021 is hereby suspended till the next date of hearing, being payable to EOBI with the Nazir of this Court within stipulated time. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5405 Const. P. 6300/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Bashir Ahmed Abbasi Kalhoro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-APR-21 Yes Prima facie under the Sindh Rules of Business, 1986, the Chief Minister is the Chief Executive of the Province; and, has no direct role whatsoever in the matter of a Junior School Teacher, about his appointment, posting, transfer, promotion, and disciplinary issues. On the aforesaid proposition, the Honble Supreme Court in the case of The STATE v. ANWAR SAIF ULLAH KHAN (PLD 2016 Supreme Court 276) Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.572-K/2021 Bashir Ahmed v. Government of Sindh Chief Secretary of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5406 Const. P. 828/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 Faisal Khalid (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 08-APR-21 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5407 Criminal Appeal 61/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2016 Mir Hassan Bangwar and others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 15-JUN-17 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) J.P.12/2021 Ali Akbar v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5408 Cr.J.A 62/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2018 Sadullah (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-JUL-21 Yes We have also observed that in case in hand the prosecution has failed to prove the safe custody of the recovered charas and its safe transmission to Chemical Examiner. The recovery of charas was allegedly affected on 20.10.2017 and the sealed samples were sent for chemical analysis on 23.10.2017; however, it is not known as to where and in whose possession the alleged samples were kept during intervening period. PW-1 Excise Inspector Gul Muhammad Bhutto, the complainant/ I.O has not furnished in his evidence any detail regarding safe custody of the alleged samples, therefore, no evidence is available in record to prove the safe custody of the recovered substance at the Excise police station and its safe transmission from said place to the office of Chemical Examiner. It has been held by the Apex Court in the cases of Abdul Ghani and others v. The State and others (2019 SCMR 608), Faizan Ali v. The State (2019 SCMR 1649), The State through Regional Director ANF v. Imam Bukhsh and others (2018 SCMR 2039), Ikramullah and others v. The State (2015 SCMR 1002) and Amjad Ali v. The State (2012 SCMR 577) that in a case where safe custody of the recovered substance or safe transmission of sample of the recovered substance is not proved by the prosecution through any independent evidence, it cannot be said with any degree of confidence that the prosecution had succeeded in proving its case against an accused beyond reasonable doubt. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5409 Const. P. 4978/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Dr. Muhammad Qasim (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 Yes It is pertinent to mention that petitioner is working in BPS-19 and his promotion will be due after one year hence at this juncture questioning direct appointment on BPS-20 cannot be termed justified and legal; hence instant petition is dismissed. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5410 Const. P. 2135/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Noman Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAR-21 Yes Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue in service, since he is facing the NAB reference based on moral turpitude, thus we cannot order the competent authority to continue his service. Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5411 Const. P. 7753/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mushtaque Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5412 Const. P. 6661/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Shabana & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.968-K/2022 Mst.Shabana & others v. Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
5413 Const. P. 1736/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Akhlaque Hussain Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-JUN-21 Yes whether the post of Additional/Assistant Advocate General could be filled amongst District Attorneys as per the Sindh Law Officers (Conditions of Service Rules), 1940 as amended up to date; and, whether between the notification dated 10.5.2016 bearing S.REG:1(22)2015/117 and notification dated 9.4.2018 bearing S.REG.4(07)/2018 which one is to prevail; and, whether the service structure for Deputy District Attorney and District Attorney in Solicitor Department, Government of Sindh needs to be streamlined ? Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1633-K/2021 Amir Ahmed Kehar v. The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed
5414 Cr.Bail 242/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Ameer Bux @ Luqoo Bangwar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.112-K/2021 Deedar Ali v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5415 Const. P. 1955/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Bashir Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 Yes we direct the respondents that they shall constitute a fresh Board comprising of recruitment committee/Board and they shall conduct test in the applied Chemistry as well as provide ample opportunity to the Petitioner for an interview and shall pass a speaking order with regard to his regularization in case if he qualifies shall be accommodated within two months. It is pertinent to mention here that recruitment committee shall also examine the cases of the persons/employees who were batchmats of the petitioner were regularized; petitioner shall also be treated one same anology. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.939-K/2023 The Commissioner Inland Revenue (Zone-VI) v. Bashir Ahmed Soomro Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of, only Law point will be taken up in the 2nd week of July,24.
5416 Const. P. 2089/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Jamshed Ali Bhutta (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Otherss (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-MAR-21 Yes Government accommodation--Police Department Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5417 Cr.Bail 272/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2021 Bakhshal Abro (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-JUL-21 Yes Post Arrest Bail Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5418 Const. P. 5265/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehboob Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5419 Const. P. 5028/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Shehzad Waheed and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5420 Const. P. 7809/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Abdul Majeed & Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 04-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.3113/2021 Mohammad Yaseen and others v. Abdul Majeed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5421 Const. P. 7948/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Ali Azhar Khan Baloch (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5422 Const. P. 5499/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Arif Latif (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5423 Const. P. 1753/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Syyed Jehangir Ali Shah (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5424 Const. P. 6344/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-NOV-21 Yes Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance corporation: Khyber Pukhtunkhwa Civil Servant Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation Act 2014, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Civil Servants Retirement Benefits and Death Compensation (amendment) Act No.V of 2016, judgment of the Peshawar High Court in case of Fida Muhammad Durrani and judgment of Islamabad High Court in case of Muhammad Rehan Khan; advice by Advocate General Sindh to the Government of Sindh with regard to amendment in existing law/rules. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5425 Const. P. 6344/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-SEP-21 No It is also surfaced that there is a Provincial Welfare Board chaired by the Secretary, Finance Department who is the competent authority to enter into contract with the insurance company, therefore, it would be in all fairness to deliberate the issue after getting assistance by the Chairman, Provincial Welfare Board. Accordingly, he shall be in attendance alongwith contract signed with the insurance company as well he shall clarify whether that amount is deducted from the salary or benefits of the civil servants or directly by the government through any other means. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5426 Const. P. 8005/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Full Bench NIRC & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-MAR-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2939/2021 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others,C.A.480/2022 Regional Manager Askari Guard (Pvt) Ltd, Karachi v. Full Bench National Industrial Relation Commission (NIRC) and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted,Pending
5427 Const. P. 6694/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Abdul Alim Zafar (Petitioner) VS The Education Sect: & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 04-MAY-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5428 Const. P. 152/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Abdul Aziz (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sat Bharai & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5429 II.A. 70/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mehfooz Ahmed (Appellant) VS Mst. Rehmat Begum & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.49-K/2022 Mst.Rehmat Begum v. Mehfooz Ahmed & othersmanhg Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5430 Const. P. 761/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Erum Shaheen (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5431 Const. P. 3762/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Muhammasd Rizwan Soomro (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5432 Civil Revision 159/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 M/s Kotri Roller Flour Mills (Applicant) VS Bheru Mal (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5433 2022 SBLR Sindh 505 Const. P. 974/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Isra village Housing Scheme (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
5434 R.A (Civil Revision) 114/2003 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2003 Ismail & Ors (Applicant) VS Haji Ramzan (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5435 Const. P. 1015/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Scherazade Jamali D/o Zahid Hussain Khan Jamali (Petitioner) VS Inspector General of Police and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-21 No At this stage, I asked the learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.5 is natural guardian of minor and the arrangements so made by the Honourable Supreme Court cannot be varied by this Court. Secondly, the minor Hasan Syed Gillani, who is present in Court, has shown his willingness to remain with the father for few years, petitioners counsel replied to the query and submitted that respondent No.5 is bound to comply with the terms and conditions of amicable settlement arrived between the parties, which is now part of the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court, therefore, the custody of the minor shall remain with the mother in Karachi / Islamabad. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.106-K/2022 Scherazade Jamali v. Inspector General of Police & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5436 Const. P. 51/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Shahnaz Bibi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.1713-K/2021 Mst. Shahnaz Bibi v. Ali Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5437 Civil Revision 221/2017 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Imamuddin (Applicant) VS Abdul Jabbar & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5438 Civil Revision 232/2004 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2004 Zeal Pak Cement Factory (Applicant) VS Kazi Nisar Ahmed and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5439 Const. P. 741/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Altaf Hussain (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5440 Cr.Bail 2264/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MUHAMMAD TARIQ S/O HABIBULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-JAN-22 Yes seeks bail after arrest in Crime No.646/2021, registered under Sections 420/468/471/470/489-F/34 PPC---Coming to the allegations of three cheques, which were later on dishonored, a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. primarily, every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation; and, lastly the cheque in question is dishonored on presentation. Prima-facie, in the present case allegations are almost same, therefore, tentative assessment of record explicitly shows that the complainant has been defrauded by the applicant for the reasons discussed supra. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5441 Cr.Bail 912/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 DARYA KHAN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5442 Const. P. 19/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Shahzad (Petitioner) VS Mushtaque Ahmed & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.47-K/2022 Shahzad Khan v. Mushtaque Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Not Pressed
5443 Cr.Misc. 718/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ali Shah (Applicant) VS SP Complaint Cell (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5444 Const. P. 336/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Nawab (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.66-K/2022 Muhammad Nawab Ali v. Muhammad Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5445 Const. P. 441/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Saleem Akhtar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
5446 Const. P. 1720/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Razzaque (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 07-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5447 Const. P. 2380/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Khaliq (Petitioner) VS Prov of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
5448 Const. P. 583/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Lakhmir (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5449 Const. P. 1328/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mehboob Ali & Others (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
5450 Const. P. 594/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2017 Muhammad Urs (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
5451 Civil Revision 28/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Abdul Aziz (Applicant) VS Mst. Irshad Bibi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5452 Const. P. 684/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Tasneem Safdar (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5453 Criminal Miscelleneous 382/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 SHAHZAD QURESHI S/O MUHAMMAD AKHTAR (Applicant) VS DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE/ JOP KARACHI EAST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5454 Const. P. 700/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Sadia Khan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5455 Const. P. 702/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Imtiaz Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5456 Const. P. 49/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Manzoor Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Mst. Ganj Bibi & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5457 Const. P. 755/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Naseem (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5458 Const. P. 685/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Noman Parekh (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5459 Const. P. 695/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Jan-e-Alam (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5460 Const. P. 745/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5461 Const. P. 1556/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Khurram Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5462 Civil Revision 190/2006 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: R.A. No. 195 of 2006 Muhammad Ishaque Vs. Photo and others 2006 Misri (Applicant) VS Photo and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5463 Const. P. 435/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Khalil Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5464 Const. P. 711/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5465 Const. P. 712/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Khawaja Awais Mahmood (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5466 Const. P. 769/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Razia and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5467 Const. P. 2197/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 M/s Javedan Cement Ltd (Petitioner) VS S.L.A.T and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-22 Yes Compensation instead of reinstatment Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1210-K/2023 Ghulam Murtaza v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5468 Const. P. 2296/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Mohammad Siddique (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-OCT-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
5469 Const. P. 715/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Waqas Memon (Petitioner) VS Boulevard Mall Hyderabad & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 17-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5470 Const. P. 2134/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2013 Abdul Wahid and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry C.P.101-K/2022 Abdul Wahid & others v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Livestock, Fisheries Department & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
5471 Const. P. 1807/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Mirza Fayyaz Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5472 Civil Revision 116/2002 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2002 Govt Of Pakistan & Others (Applicant) VS Noor Muhammad (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author)
5473 Const. P. 477/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Fareed Ahmed & Other (Petitioner) VS FED Of Pakistan & Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-NOV-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry(Author) C.P.105/2022 Federation of Pakistan thr. Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and others v. Fareed Ahmed and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5474 Const. P. 1750/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Shamshad Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5475 Const. P. 681/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5476 Const. P. 6927/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Razzaq A. Dawood (Petitioner) VS M/s Urban Builders and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.1944/2018 A. Razzaq Dawood v. Director General/Chief Executive, Sindh Building Control Authority & others,C.P.6389/2021 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. A. Razzaq Dawood and others,C.A.646/2022 M/s Urban Properties Builders, Karachi and others v. A. Razzaq Dawood and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of,Disposed Converted into Appeal and Allowed and Remanded,Disposed
5477 Const. P. 3015/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Ghulam Haider (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5478 Const. P. 324/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Mst. Mukhtiar Begum (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5479 Const. P. 5786/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mehboob Raza (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAR-22 No contempt Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5480 Const. P. 3964/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2013 Irshad Ahmed and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5481 Const. P. 3842/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Niaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Sect: School Education & Literacy Dept: & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5482 Const. P. 1168/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Pir Shahabuddin and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5483 Const. P. 822/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Fayaz Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5484 Const. P. 6581/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Qamar ul Arafeen (Petitioner) VS The Vice Chancellor Karachi University and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5485 M.A. 39/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Sahib & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5486 Const. P. 5968/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Prof. Dr. Moin-ud-din (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5487 Const. P. 6541/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Haji Asif S/o Haji Suleman (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 05-JUL-21 Yes Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5488 Const. P. 5016/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Memon and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.569-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Sindh & others v. Sohail Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5489 Const. P. 5549/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Usman Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-FEB-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5490 Const. P. 1581/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Arbab Ali Samejo (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5491 Const. P. 27/2010 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2010 Nooruddin and 05 others (Petitioner) VS Federal Land Commissioner and others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 25-JAN-22 Yes The pivotal questions involved in the present proceedings are whether the subject land surrendered under Martial Law Regulation (MLR) 64 of 1959, which was resumed by Deputy Land Commissioner (DLC) Hyderabad vide order dated 17.6.1959, and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners became Qabuli Land? And, whether Civil Suit No.40/1972 filed by respondent No.7 was rightly decreed vide judgment and decree dated 23.10.1974, and its viries, could be called in question in Constitution Petition, in the terms paragraph 19 and 26 of Martial Law Regulation-1972? And, whether the Chief Land Commissioner, Sindh could pass the order after the judgment of Honorable Supreme Court in the case of Qazalbash Waqf, to re-determine of holding declaration under MLR/115/72 and LR-II/77 after the surrender of the excess land by the declarant, its resumption by the government; and its subsequent allotment to the petitioners in the year 1959 and 1960? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1137/2022 Akhund Ghulam Muhammad through L.Rs and others v. Federal Land Commission, Islamabad through its Chairman and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
5492 Const. P. 438/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Shahnaz Akhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-NOV-21 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5493 Const. P. 3981/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Saeed Babar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-APR-22 Yes Seniority in service, cadre, or post to which an official is promoted is to take effect from the date of regular promotion to that service, cadre, or post and not from the date of any ad-hoc induction Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5494 Const. P. 5230/2015 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2015 Sukkur Tax Bar (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and ORs (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5495 Const. P. 5673/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 The General Tyre & Rubber Co. (Petitioner) VS Farhan Ashraf and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5496 Const. P. 7595/2017 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2017 Jawad Hussain Memon and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.335/2018 Federal Board of Revenue thr. the Chairman/Secretary Revenue Division, Islamabad v. Jawad Hussain Memon & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Leave Granted.impugned judgement is suspended.to be fixed after 3 months.
5497 Const. P. 806/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Samiullah Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5498 Const. P. 7072/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Badar ul Haq Kandhro (Petitioner) VS Chairman Council for Work & Housing Research & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5499 Const. P. 2157/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Mehran Bottlers and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5500 Const. P. 4587/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s Adil Textile Ind and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5501 Const. P. 75/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ali Raza and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-JAN-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5502 Const. P. 363/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Khan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5503 Const. P. 819/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Aijaz Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5504 Const. P. 102/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Uris (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.714-K/2022 The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & another v. Muhammad Uris Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Disposed of
5505 Const. P. 1986/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Inayat Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-APR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5506 M.A. 4/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Telenor Microfinance Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Rehana Sabir (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-DEC-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.5885/2021 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority, Islamabad and another v. M/s Labbaik Pvt Limited, Karachi and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned
5507 Const. P. 326/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Adnan (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-FEB-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5508 Const. P. 1072/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Prof: Dr. Aneela Atta ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5509 Const. P. 6052/2014 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2014 Pakistan Steel Mills Corp (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Arif And ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-21 No Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5510 Const. P. 2302/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2016 M/s A & U Garments and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Paksitan and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 03-DEC-21 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P.L.A.90/2022 M/s Helix Pharma Pvt Ltd Karachi v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Human Resource Development Islamabad and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5511 Const. P. 5358/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Mst. Atiya Siddiqui and Ors (Petitioner) VS B.I.E.K & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5512 Const. P. 4149/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Wali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5513 Const. P. 2962/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Ammer Mukhtiar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5514 Const. P. 5449/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s Rajby Ind (Petitioner) VS Ghaffar and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5515 Const. P. 1469/2003 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2003 Allied Bank of Pak: and others (Petitioner) VS National Ind. Relation Commissio and ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5516 Const. P. 830/1999 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 1999 Haroon Rashild. (Petitioner) VS Fed.of Pakistan & ors. (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-FEB-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5517 Const. P. 7916/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Dr. Shaista Shaukat Ali and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5518 Const. P. 205/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Khushbo (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5519 Const. P. 415/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Rashid Khan (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5520 Const. P. 602/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Najma & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5521 Const. P. 617/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Gufrana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5522 Const. P. 556/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Khalil Rehman Juno & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5523 Const. P. 537/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Muhammad Ibrahim & another (Petitioner) VS Govt of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5524 Const. P. 174/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Zubair Aahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sinhd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5525 Const. P. 31/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Zeeshan Khalid (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5526 Const. P. 635/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zeba Mukhtiar & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5527 Const. P. 422/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Shabi Ul Hussain Rashdi & Others (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5528 Cr.Misc. 137/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Meer Hassan Jakhrani (Applicant) VS SHO PS Muhammadpur Odho & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5529 I. A 13/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ali Haider Umrani. (Appellant) VS Javed Ali. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 15-AUG-22 No Ali Hyder Umrani Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5530 Const. P. 299/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Hyder Jamali (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5531 Const. P. 717/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Muhammad Ameen Siyal (Petitioner) VS Saeed Ahmed & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 19-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
5532 Const. P. 55/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Bilal & others (Petitioner) VS Babar Ali & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5533 R.A (Civil Revision) 34/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muharam Khan (Applicant) VS Karim Bux & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5534 Criminal Miscelleneous 64/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Mst. Fahamida Khoso (Applicant) VS SHO PS Tangwani and Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5535 Const. P. 350/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst Gulshan & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5536 Cr.Bail 1428/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 DAWOOD KHAN S/O WAHEED GUL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.11-K/2023 Arif Hussain v. The State & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5537 Const. P. 7070/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sajjad Ahmed and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.527-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Sajjad Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5538 Const. P. 69/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Agha Shoaib Abbas & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-APR-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5539 Const. P. 111/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Moazama Shahzadi & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5540 Const. P. 577/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Gul Bano & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5541 I. A 36/2000 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2000 Pakistan Mineral Development Corporation Ltd (Appellant) VS Muhammad Saghir (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5542 Const. P. 65/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Aisha and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5543 Const. P. 2608/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Abdullah Soomro (Petitioner) VS UBL & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 18-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.330/2023 United Bank Limited through its President, Karachi and others v. Abdullah Soomro and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5544 Const. P. 668/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Muskan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5545 Const. P. 1695/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Ghayasuddin Shahani and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5546 Criminal Miscelleneous 564/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Ikramullah (Applicant) VS SSP Complaint Cell SBA & ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5547 Const. P. 5137/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Sohail Raza Chandio and Others (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 10-SEP-21 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5548 Const. P. 442/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Mahanoor & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5549 Const. P. 335/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Dr. Muhammad Masood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5550 Const. P. 646/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ghulamuddin (Petitioner) VS Federation (Respondent) D.B. Order 28-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
5551 Const. P. 5635/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Habib ur Rehman (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-FEB-23 Yes The period of adhoc appointment could be counted for pensionary benefits along with regular service. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.2126/2023 Trustees of the Karachi Port, through its Board of Trustees, KPT, Karachi v. Mazhar Ali Jatoi and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned.to be fixed before 3 member bench
5552 Const. P. 8830/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Wahid Khursheed Kunwar (Petitioner) VS EOBI and Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 13-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5553 Const. P. 399/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Dania & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5554 Const. P. 755/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Syed Zahir Shah & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1477-K/2022 Syed Zahir Shah v. Ghulam Muhammad & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5555 Const. P. 2260/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Syed Meeral Shah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5556 Const. P. 122/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Rukhsana & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5557 Const. P. 647/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Shahid Habib (Petitioner) VS FUUAST & Othres (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1269-K/2023 Faiz Khan v. Zia Hussain kazilbash and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed as Infructuous
5558 Const. P. 347/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zulekhan & Another (Petitioner) VS SSP T.M Khan & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5559 Const. P. 541/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sajjad Hussain (Petitioner) VS Dr. Amber Kareem & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5560 Const. P. 1138/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Salman Ameer Lohan (Petitioner) VS Mst. Aasia Tahir & Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-DEC-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5561 Const. P. 631/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst Bakhtawar (Petitioner) VS P.O sindh & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5562 Const. P. 135/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Ghazal Kazim (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5563 Const. P. 453/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Syed Muhammad Usama (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5564 Const. P. 306/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Sameena & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5565 Const. P. 344/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst.Parveen & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5566 Const. P. 503/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Areeka & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5567 Const. P. 690/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Nazar Muhammad Jamali (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5568 Criminal Miscelleneous 649/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE (Applicant) VS MST NAJMA & AN OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5569 Const. P. 2087/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst: Bano (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5570 Const. P. 5681/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Muhammad Sohail (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5571 Const. P. 504/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Noor Khatoon & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5572 Const. P. 3965/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Faisal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 03-FEB-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5573 Const. P. 337/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Zaib-ul-Nisa & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5574 Criminal Miscelleneous 565/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 RIAZ HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS P.O SINDH & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 31-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5575 II.A. 59/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Manthar Ali & Another. (Appellant) VS Registrar Sindh University & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 04-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.453-K/2023 Manthar Ali & another v. Registrar Sindh University Jamshoro & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5576 Const. P. 2067/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mohammad Ismail Panhwar (Petitioner) VS Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5577 Const. P. 437/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Sawera & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5578 Const. P. 551/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Kainat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5579 Const. P. 674/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Imamuddin (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5580 Const. P. 679/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 M khbaib Siddiqui (Petitioner) VS Pakisan Qaimkhani Education Trust Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5581 Const. P. 7081/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Syed Mehboob and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.538-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Syed Mehboob & others,C.P.537-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Ghulam Murtaza & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed,Pending
5582 Const. P. 583/2009 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2009 Muhammad Yameen and Others (Petitioner) VS Begum Sarwari Irfanullah and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-OCT-19 No Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5583 II.A. 57/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Muhammad Iqbal (Appellant) VS Mehmood Ali & Others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 05-DEC-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1473-K/2022 Muhammad Iqbal deceased through his LRs. & others v. Mehmood Ali & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5584 Const. P. 655/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Muhammad Sulleman (Petitioner) VS Mst. Sidra & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5585 Const. P. 4600/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Sultan Ahmed Jalbani (Petitioner) VS KPT & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-JAN-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5586 Cr.Bail 214/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana; attached cases: Cr. Bail Appln. No. S-215 & S-280 of 2022 2022 Rafique Ahmed Bijarani and Others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 25-JUL-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5587 Const. P. 621/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Mst. Fozia & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5588 Const. P. 327/2020 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2020 Maqbool Ahmed Nizamani (Petitioner) VS S.P Complent Cell Hyd & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-NOV-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5589 R.A (Civil Revision) 21/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Karim Dino & others (Applicant) VS Khair Muhammad thr: LRs & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5590 Const. P. 73/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Sahit Nawaz (Petitioner) VS I.G Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5591 Const. P. 1288/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Abdul Shakoor Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5592 Const. P. 566/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Mst. Waheeda & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Free will Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5593 Cr.Rev 123/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 AIJAZ AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE & AN OTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-OCT-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5594 Const. P. 8295/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 Tariq Mehmood & Os (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.574-K/2023 Tariq Mehmood & others v. Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Production & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5595 Const. P. 2220/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Muhammad Nadeem Akber (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 23-MAY-22 Yes whether the recruitment rules have been notified or gazetted--whether the competent authority is empowered under the Rules, 1974, to appoint civil servants from different departments of Government of Sindh to the Inspection and Registration of Private Institutions, School Education, and Literacy Department Cadre Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.2287/2022 Ghulam Mujtaba Dayo v. Muhammad Nadeem Akber and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5596 II.A. 24/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2019 Shahid Hussain Mirza (Appellant) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-SEP-20 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5597 Cr.Bail 15/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Abdul Ghafoor Sayed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho(Author)
5598 Criminal Appeal 55/2012 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2012 Hassan @ Ali Hassan and another (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JAN-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5599 Const. P. 802/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Ayoub (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.M.A.8623/2022 Federation of Pakistan through Ministry of Food Security & Research Islamabad and others v. Muhammad Ayoub and others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5600 Criminal Appeal 29/2015 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2015 Baggan @ Asghar and Others (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-MAR-19 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5601 Cr.Bail 248/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Larkana 2022 Ghulam Sarwar @ Sarwar & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.131-K/2022 Ghulam Sarwar @ Sarwar & another v. The State Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5602 R.A (Civil Revision) 199/2016 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Fateh Muhammad (Applicant) VS Muhammad Ali Shah & Ors. (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5603 Const. P. 700/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Abdul Ghani Kalio (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5604 Const. P. 7071/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 M/s IFFCO Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS Sajjad Ahmed (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.528-K/2023 IFFCO Pakistan (Private) Limited v. Sajjad Ahmed & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5605 Const. P. 3077/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Prof: Dr. Arshad Aazmi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 31-MAY-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5606 Const. P. 420/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Mst. Kainat & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5607 R.A (Civil Revision) 95/2007 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2007 Sain Dino and others (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Judgement 28-NOV-22 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5608 Const. P. 473/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Khan Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5609 Const. P. 201/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5610 Const. P. 346/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Dur Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 02-SEP-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5611 Const. P. 602/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Ayesha Iftikhar (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-JAN-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5612 Const. P. 534/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Noor Ahmed & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-AUG-22 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5613 Const. P. 6118/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3162/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
5614 Cr.Acctt.A 18/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD SALIK NUKRICH (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5615 Cr.Acctt.A 19/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 SHAKEEL SULTAN S/O M. SULTAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5616 Const. P. 6120/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Waheed Ali (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ohers (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.3164/2023 Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary, Govt of Sindh, Karachi and another v. Waheed Ali and another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending Adjourned (Notice) (Next Date: 27-Jan-25)
5617 Const. P. 5343/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Khawaja Zakir uddin and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 06-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5618 Const. P. 130/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Dr. Shahzad Ali and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5619 Const. P. 2799/2016 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2016 Arab & Ors (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 21-MAR-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5620 Cr.Acq.A. 41/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Karim Bux (Appellant) VS The State and another (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5621 Criminal Miscelleneous 668/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2021 SHRIMATI TAARI (Applicant) VS LEARNED CONSUMER PROTECTION JUDGE J.M UMER KOT (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5622 I. A 34/1986 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 1986 Muhammad Alam and others (Appellant) VS Assistant Commissioner and another (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 10-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5623 Const. P. 94/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Maryam Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5624 Const. P. 3212/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 26-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5625 Cr.Bail 101/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 KHADIM ALI @ KHADIM HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.427/2023 Khadim Ali @ Khadim Hussain S/o Loung Khan and others v. The State thr. PG Sindh Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5626 R.A (Civil Revision) 98/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2023 Umair Ahmed. (Applicant) VS Noor-ul-Amin. (Respondent) S.B. Order 28-APR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5627 Const. P. 1214/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2022 Ghulam Mustafa & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 11-MAY-23 Yes Encroachment on amenity plot, no title document in favour,petition dismissed in limine. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5628 Const. P. 1858/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2018 Mst Dr.Urooj Fatima (Petitioner) VS Khurram Aijaz (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAR-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5629 Spl.Cr.Bail 38/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUSTAFA SIKANDAR S/O MUHAMMAD SIKANDAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5630 Cr.Bail 623/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 KHURSHEED AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD ZAMAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5631 Const. P. 5468/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Syed Ali Muhammad (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-FEB-24 Yes We reminded him that his service carries with it an obligation to serve the PSQCA, whichever place he is required to be posted in accordance with the exigencies of service or administrative requirements. It is for the PSQCA to take appropriate decision and such decision shall stand, unless it is vitiated either by mala fide or by extraneous consideration without any factual background or foundation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5632 Cr.Bail 2049/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BABU AMRO S/O IBRAHIM AMRO (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5633 Const. P. 1215/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Imran Qureshi S/o Imtiaz Ahmed Qureshi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5634 Criminal Miscelleneous 352/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 MST. KHALIDA W/O LATE RASHEED AYAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5635 Criminal Miscelleneous 445/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE LD XVI CJ/JM KHI WEST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5636 Criminal Miscelleneous 862/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 PARVAIZ ALAM S/O NOOR HASSAN QURESHI (Applicant) VS COURT OF VIITH ADJ MALIR KHI & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5637 Cr.Acq.A. 592/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 TARIQ MEHMOOD S/O JEHANDAD KHAN (Appellant) VS AMANULLAH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5638 Criminal Miscelleneous 910/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MST. SHAISTA W/O LIXIALIANG (Applicant) VS THE IST CJ/JM KHI WEST & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5639 Cr.Acq.A. 339/2018 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2018 MST. RAZIA MOHSIN W/O MOHSIN SAEED (Appellant) VS NAZEER AHMED & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 07-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5640 Cr.Tran 83/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 SHAHJAHAN S/O MUHAMAMD NAWAZ (Appellant) VS THE STATE THROUGH PG SINDH & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5641 Election Appeal 61/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Prem Jee S/o Daman (Appellant) VS RO PS-107 Khi South II and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5642 Criminal Miscelleneous 457/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ASIF ALI SOLANGI (Applicant) VS MST. ASMA ABDULLAH & & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 24-JUL-23 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5643 Cr.Bail 516/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR S/O TAJ MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5644 Const. P. 936/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 Mst Syeda Rafaquat Sultana wd/o Syed Bedar Hussain (Petitioner) VS Senior Superintendent of Police, Khi East & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 29-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5645 Const. P. 1357/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2020 Muhammad Haris & Ors (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.1012-K/2023 Muhammad Harris & others v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5646 Const. P. 3357/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 Naqash Mukhtar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) C.P.L.A.1015-K/2023 Naqash Mukhtair v. Province of Sindh through its Chief Secretary Government of Sindh & others Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Disposed Dismissed
5647 Cr.Bail 1080/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD RIAZ S/O AHMED KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Crl.P.155-K/2023 Muhammad Iqbal v. The State through Prosecutor General Sindh & another Before Supreme Court of Pakistan Pending
5648 Const. P. 760/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Fahad Nasir (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5649 Election Appeal 239/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Abdul Ghaffar S/o Muhammad Hussain (Appellant) VS RO PS-113 Keamari and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5650 Election Appeal 159/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Nisar Ahmed S/o Muhammad Safar (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and Another (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5651 Election Appeal 150/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 M. Masood Khan Mandokhail S/o Muhammad Ayub (Appellant) VS The RO NA-242 Keamari and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5652 Election Appeal 254/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Anwar Ali S/o Mir Hazar Khan (Appellant) VS Provincial Election Commission Sindh and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 10-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5653 Cr.Bail 1953/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ISMAIL S/O MUHAMMAD NAEEM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5654 Cr.Bail 1025/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad; attached cases: Cr.Bail.A S.1045/2023 2023 Moose Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 16-OCT-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5655 Spl:Sales Tax Ref: A. 324/2011 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2011 Commissioner Inland Revenue (Applicant) VS Digri Sugar Mills Ltd (Respondent) D.B. Order 27-FEB-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5656 Cr.Bail 1707/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 HASEENA D/O PEER BAKHSH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5657 Const. P. 1067/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Siddiq Ahmed (Petitioner) VS NIRC and Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-MAR-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5658 Criminal Miscelleneous 510/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 ABDUL RAZZAK JOKHIO S/O ARIB (Applicant) VS SIKANDAR S/O HASHIM & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5659 Criminal Miscelleneous 146/2019 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ S/O MUHAMMAD AHMED (Applicant) VS THE STATE & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5660 Criminal Miscelleneous 633/2022 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD ISMAIL SHAR (Applicant) VS LEARNED 1ST CJ/JM THATTA & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5661 Cr.Acq.A. 68/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2021 LEVIS PAKISTAN PVT. LTD (Appellant) VS AMIR MEHMOOD & OTHERS (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5662 Election Appeal 209/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Tasneem S/o Muhammad Fareed Uddin (Appellant) VS The Election Commission of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5663 Cr.Bail 2731/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ZUHAIB S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5664 Cr.Bail 1789/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD FAISAL S/O RIAZ AHMED & ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 30-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5665 Cr.Bail 2628/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 RAFAQAT ALI S/O ASHIQ HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5666 Election Appeal 233/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Gulab Khan Thr. Attorney Muhammad Nasir (Appellant) VS The RO NA-234 Korangi and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JAN-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5667 Cr.Bail 1427/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 NAVEED S/O PEER BAKHSH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5668 Criminal Miscelleneous 604/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AKHTIAR HUSSAIN SOOMRO S/O ALLAH BAKSH (Applicant) VS SADAQAT ALI SOOMRO & ORS (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5669 Cr.Bail 679/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 AMJAD HUSSAIN S/O SYED NAZEER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 09-AUG-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5670 Cr.Bail 1818/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 JASIM S/O FATEH MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5671 Cr.Bail 1890/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 TOUQEER S/O NAZIM HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 22-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5672 Criminal Miscelleneous 600/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Nawab S/o Shehbaz (Applicant) VS The State & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 23-NOV-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5673 Cr.Bail 1519/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD KHALIQ IQBAL S/O MUHAMMAD IQBAL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5674 Cr.Bail 1907/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 BILAL KHAN S/O SHAH DAORAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 12-SEP-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5675 Cr.Acq.A. 124/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD ABID S/O MUHAMMAD YAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 14-DEC-23 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5676 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. 288/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi; attached cases: SCRA Nos. 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294 & 295 of 2020 2020 Collector of Customs (Applicant) VS M/s. Unique Industries (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 30-JAN-24 Yes only such question of law can be answered under Section 196 of the Customs Act which arise out of the Order of Tribunal Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5677 Const. P. 1564/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Mst Zainab Butwani & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5678 Const. P. 873/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mehtab Ahmed Khoso (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5679 Criminal Miscelleneous 462/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Ghulam Hyder and another (Applicant) VS SSP Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5680 Const. P. 1788/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Sarfraz Ali Abro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman
5681 Const. P. 618/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Rabail Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5682 Cr.Bail 140/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Muhammad Akram (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 21-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5683 Const. P. 1597/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Syed Khan Muhammad Syed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 No In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5684 Criminal Miscelleneous 434/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Prem Kumar (Applicant) VS SSP Tharpakar @ Mithi & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-SEP-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5685 Const. P. 996/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ali Jan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others0 (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes It appears from the record that the bunch of petitions were disposed of by this Court with the direction to Secretary Food Sindh to ensure the distribution of BARDANA to the petitioners/growers/Khatedars without fail, and their other ancillary issues to be taken care of accordingly. However, certain issues about payment of dues to growers/petitioners are still unresolved; and, there is a shocking delay in making payment to the growers/Khatedars on the part of official respondents. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5686 Const. P. 285/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Abdul Hafeez Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5687 Const. P. 5001/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Sania Zahra and Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-OCT-24 Yes In a landmark 2019 judgment, the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the National Commission on Status of Women v Government of Pakistan PLD 2019 SC 218 declared jirgas illegal, citing violations of international human rights laws and the Constitution of Pakistan. The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of equal protection before the law, due process, and fair trial, rights that are often denied in jirga proceedings. This judgment is a significant step towards upholding women's rights and ensuring that justice is administered through legal channels. It is crucial to continue to monitor the implementation of this decision and to address the social and cultural factors that contribute to the persistence of harmful practices. In this regard, FIR can be lodged against the holding of illegal jirga by the chieftain and all others who participated in the Jirga in violation of the 2019 Supreme Court judgment. This judgment declared the jirga system as illegal and against the fundamental rights of citizens. Law enforcement agencies are obligated to take action against those who organize or participate in such jirgas. Let at the first instance, FIR be lodged by the SSP concerned and bring the culprits into justice without fail. 8. So far as FIR No.412 of 2024 of PS Malir Cantt, District Malir, Karachi registered under Section 365-B PPC is concerned the same is hereby quashed and such summary report be submitted before the concerned Magistrate for disposal of the case. He is directed to take action against all concerned police officials who failed and neglected to perform their duties to curb this menace. 9. The IGP Sindh is directed to take stock of the things and take prompt disciplinary action against all police officials of the concerned district/police station in accordance with the law. 10. In view of the statement of the parties, the private respondents are directed to furnish an indemnity bond of Rs.500,000/- each before the Nazir of this Court for the aforesaid purpose. 11. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5688 Const. P. 205/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Hafeez Shoro (Petitioner) VS Province of sindh & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 26-SEP-24 Yes Learned Assistant A.G Sindh assisted by counsel for the private respondents??? alongwith police officials present in court and states that the official respondents as well as private respondents will act strictly in accordance with law and they will be neutral in the private affairs between the parties, if any. Police officials are present and state that they shall act strictly in accordance with law and provide the protection to the petitioner and his family members if any harassment is caused to them by the private respondents; however, if any cognizable offence is committed by either party, they will act swiftly in accordance with law. 3. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition in terms of the statement of learned A.A.G Sindh as well as counsel for the private respondents that no harassment shall be caused to either party. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5689 Criminal Appeal 141/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 JABIR SYED S/O LAL SYED (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 11-NOV-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5690 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A 153/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) VS SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent) D.B. Order 12-NOV-24 Yes It is a well-settled principle of law that where the direct evidence fails the corroborative piece(s) of evidence will be of no help to the prosecution as portrayed by the learned APG. Reliance can be made to the case of ???Abid Ali & 2 others 2011 SCMR 208??? wherein it was held:- ???Although where the ocular account has been disbelieved the recovered articles which are carrying corroborative value cannot substantiate the charge against the appellants because, in the absence of direct evidence, corroborative evidence by itself cannot bring home the charge of murder against the appellants.??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5691 Const. P. 446/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Shakoor & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5692 Const. P. 270/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mohammad Malook & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5693 Const. P. 580/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Javed Ali Khalidi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5694 Const. P. 240/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Shafaullah Korejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5695 Const. P. 5497/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Naseer Rais (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-NOV-24 Yes Principally, Courts should avoid pejorative remarks against non-parties and unjust criticism of parties, vilifying them should also be avoided. Judges can criticize relevant matters and witnesses but should avoid criticizing those in official positions without valid justification that is subject to jurisdiction. A presiding officer of the Court must give a person the opportunity to explain condemnatory facts before criticizing him/her. This is especially important for public servants, who should be given a chance to defend themselves before being criticized. Criticizing someone without giving them a chance to respond is unfair and may be considered outside the judge's jurisdiction. Judges must be independent, but also fair and restrained. They should only criticize people if they have a chance to defend themselves if there is evidence to support the criticism, and if it is necessary for the case. Judicial pronouncements should be sober, moderate, and reserved. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Nusrat Yasmin v. Registrar, PHC,(PLD 2019 SC 719) and Aijaz Ahmed v. State. (PLD 2021 SC 752). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5696 Const. P. 1093/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Imtiaz Ali Ghunio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5697 Const. P. 371/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Tarique Hussain Chajro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5698 Const. P. 354/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Majid Ali Lakho & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], 8. All the petitions stand disposed of in the above terms. J U D G E J U D G E Nasim/P.A Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5699 Const. P. 410/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Siddique Indhar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5700 Const. P. 352/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Majida BIbi & another (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ramzan & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5701 Const. P. 543/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Syeda Shamim Raza Syed (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 15-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5702 Const. P. 1421/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Javed Maitlo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5703 Const. P. 413/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mumtaz Ali Siyal & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5704 Const. P. 1640/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mst Naila Naz Gadani Balouch (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5705 Const. P. 532/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 AKK Bhanbhro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5706 Const. P. 738/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Riaz Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5707 Const. P. 6349/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 M/s Nobel Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) VS NAB and Another (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-OCT-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5708 Const. P. 546/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zain ul Abidin (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5709 Const. P. 602/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 BIlal Hussain Chang (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5710 Const. P. 1232/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Ayaz Hussain Solangi (Petitioner) VS Chief Secretary Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5711 Const. P. 1045/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Faiz Muhammad lakhan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5712 Const. P. 974/2020 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2020 Zeeshan Ali Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5713 Cr.Bail 2324/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 MUHAMMAD TANVEER KHAN S/O MUHAMMAD YOUSUF KHAN (Applicant) VS XTH ADJ KHI SOUTH & ANOTHER (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes The only question involved in the present bail matter is whether the bail can be refused in section 471 PPC., which is a bailable offense, whereas Sections 406 & 468 are punishable by up to seven years. In such circumstances, when the offenses do not fall within the prohibition contained in Section 497(1) Cr. P.C and punishment of the offense is less than 10 years, the Supreme Court in the case of Iftikhar Ahmed v The State PLD 2021 SC 799 has given loud and clear directions to all courts in the country that granting of bail in offenses not falling within the prohibitory limb of section 497, Cr.P.C. shall be a rule, and refusal shall be an exception. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5714 Const. P. 459/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Shabir Ahmed & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5715 Cr.Bail 1235/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 ZAHOOR AHMED S/O UMER KHAN & 02 ORS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 08-JUL-24 Yes The Supreme Court in similar circumstances has dealt with the issue involved in the present case. However, in the present case, the applicants have been charged with Section 337-F(III) i.e. Ghayrjaifah mutalimah. The punishment of Section 337-F(III) is daman and may also be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term that may extend to three years as ta???zir. So far as Section 337-F(V) Ghayrjaifah Hashmiya is daman and may also be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term that may extend to five years. 8. As far as section 324 PPC is concerned, in an attempt to murder case falling within the ambit of section 324, P.P.C., the nature of the act done, the intention of the offender and the circumstances leading to the occurrence are the essential ingredients, which need to be probed into determine the guilt or otherwise of an accused. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5716 Cr.Tran 55/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 SHAKEEL AHMED S/O MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 01-JUL-24 Yes To answer the aforesaid proposition, it is well-settled law that any aggrieved person can file a Transfer Application before this Court under Section 526, Cr.P.C. if there appears reasonable apprehension of injustice being done due to the conduct of the court subordinate to the High Court. The said grievances must be agitated before this Court but should be supported by legal requirements of law. It would be advantageous to go through provisions of Section 526, Cr.P.C. which read as follows:- ???Section 526. High Court may transfer case or itself try it. (1) Whenever it is made to appear to the High Court:- (a) that a fair and impartial inquiry or trial cannot be had in any Criminal Court subordinate thereto, or (b) that some question of law of unusual difficulty is likely to arise, or (c) that a view of the place in or near which any offence has been committed may be required for the satisfactory inquiry into or trial of the same, or (d) that an order under this section will tend to the general convenience of the parties or witnesses, or (e) that such an order is expedient for the ends of justice, or is required by any provision of this Code; it may order: (i) that any offence be inquired into or tried by any Court not empowered under sections 177 to 184 (both inclusive), but in other respects competent to inquire into or try such offence. (ii) that any particular case or appeal, or class of cases or appeals, be transferred from a Criminal Court subordinate to its authority to any other such Criminal Court of equal or superior jurisdiction; (iii) that any particular case or appeal be transferred to and tried before itself; or (iv) that an accused person be sent for trial to itself or to a Court of Session. (2) When the High Court withdraws for trial before itself any case from any Court [....] it shall observe in such trial the same procedure which that Court would have observed if the case had not been so withdrawn. (3) The High Court may act either on the report of the lower Court, or the application of a party interested, or on its own initiative. (4) Every application for the exercise of the power conferred by this section shall be made by motion, which shall, except when the applicant is the Advocate-General, be supported by affidavit or affirmation. (5) When an accused person makes an application under this section the High Court may direct him to execute a bond, with or without sureties, conditioned that he will, if so ordered, pay any amount which the High Court may under this section award by way of compensation to the person opposing the application. (6) Notice to Public Prosecutor of application under this section. Every accused person making any such application shall give to the Public Prosecutor notice in writing of application, together with a copy of the grounds on which it is made; and no order shall be made on the merits of the application unless at least twenty four hours have elapsed between the giving of such notice and the hearing of the application. (6A) When any application for the exercise of the power conferred by this section is dismissed, the High Court may if it is of opinion that the application was frivolous or vexatious, order the applicant to pay by way of compensation to any person who has opposed the application such sum not exceeding [five hundred rupees] as it may consider proper in the circumstances of the case.??? Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5717 Cr.Bail 452/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MEHBOOB S/O GULZAR ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 04-JUL-24 No It is also settled now that the offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. is not made out on the part of the said Chapter providing the offenses and punishments of offenses against property, rather in fact the same has been inserted in Chapter XVIII of P.P.C., regarding offenses relating to documents and to trade of property marks. 12. The maximum punishment provided for such an offense cannot exceed 3 years. Even this conviction of 3 years is not an exclusive punishment. By using the word "or" falling in between the substantive sentence and the imposition of a fine, the Legislature has provided the punishment of a fine as an independent conviction, and this type of legislation brings a case of such nature outside the scope of prohibitory clause of Section 497(1), Cr.P.C. The possibility cannot be ruled out and it would remain within the jurisdiction of the trial Court that ultimately the sentence of fine independently is imposed and in such eventuality, nobody would be in a position to compensate the accused for the period he has spent in incarceration during the trial of an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. 13. I have experienced that in almost every case, where an accused applies for the concession of bail in the case under Section 489-F, P.P.C., it is often opposed on the ground that a huge amount is involved and it is yet to be recovered. No such process can be allowed to be adopted either by the Courts dealing with the offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. or the Investigating Agency to effect recovery. In business circles, the issuance of cheques for security purposes or as a guarantee is a routine practice, but this practice is being misused by the mischief-mongers in the business community and the cheques, which were simply issued as surety or guarantee are subsequently used as a lever to exert pressure to gain the unjustified demand of the person in possession of said cheque and then by use of the investigating machinery, the issuer of the cheque is often forced to surrender to their illegal demands and in the said manner, the provisions of this newly inserted section of the law are being misused. Securing the money in such a manner prima facie would be termed extortion. 14. Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under Section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5718 Cr.Bail 1117/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 JAWAD KHAN S/O ABDUL LATEEF (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 05-JUL-24 Yes The essential prerequisite for the grant of bail by sub-Section (2) of Section 497, Cr.P.C. is that the Court must be satisfied based on the material placed on record that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accused is not guilty of an offense punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The condition of this Clause is that sufficient grounds exist for further inquiry into the guilt of the accused, which would mean that the question should be such, that has nexus with the result of the case and can show or tend to show that the accused was not guilty of the offense with which he is charged. 8. Primarily, grant or rejection of bail is a discretionary relief but such discretion should be exercised fairly and judicially. The word discretion when applied to Court means sound discretion judiciously guided by law and to lessen the hardship of the people. For what has been discussed above, prima facie the applicant has made out a case for further inquiry into their guilt within the meaning of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C. 9. For the foregoing reasons, the applicant Jawad Khan is admitted to post-arrest bail in Crime No. 04 of 2024 under Section 6/9-2 S. No. 3 and 6/9-2 S No. 6 of CNS amended Act 2022 of PS Excise West subject to his furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs. 100,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand Only) and P.R Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5719 Cr.Rev 24/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zameer Ahmed Sahito (Applicant) VS Mst. Beebul & Others (Respondent) S.B. Order 20-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5720 Const. P. 965/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Naimatullah Jumani (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5721 Const. P. 713/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Syed Dur Muhammad Shah (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5722 Cr.Bail 1427/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 RAHEEMULLAH S/O BASHEERULLAH (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 11-JUL-24 Yes It is the cardinal principle of law that whenever a sample for forensic test is obtained or taken into possession, same should be sent to a Forensic Laboratory without any unnecessary and unexplained delay, to rule out the possibility of any fabrication or tampering. Now, in our jurisdiction too, the Supreme Court has started encouraging us to have recourse to such modern scientific and forensic evidentiary methods. In the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ali Haider alias Papu v. Jameel Hussain and others PLD 2021 SC 362 has elaborated the importance of this modern-day scientific evidence in the following words:- 5. The most significant advancement in criminal investigation since the advent of fingerprint identification is the use of DNA technology to help convict criminals or eliminate persons as suspects. DNA as scientific evidence means 'deoxyribonucleic acid.' DNA can be found in the human body and samples from semen, hair, blood, and flesh can establish a DNA matching with the DNA of another human being. Each human being has a unique DNA pattern, which is acquired by inheriting it from the biological parents. DNA analyses on saliva, skin tissue, blood, hair, and semen can now be reliably used to link criminals to crimes ..In criminal cases, like rape, murder, etc., timely medical examination and proper sampling of body fluids followed by quality forensic analysis can offer irrefutable evidence. The criminal justice system is in search of the truth. The development of DNA technology furthers the search for truth by helping police and prosecutors in the fight against violent crimes. Through the use of DNA evidence, prosecutors can establish the guilt of the accused and at the same time, DNA aids the search for truth by exonerating the innocent." Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5723 Cr.Bail 968/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD YAMEEN S/O MUHAMMAD AMIN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) S.B. Order 19-JUL-24 Yes The question involved in the present proceedings is whether the alleged amount could be recovered by detaining the applicant for an indefinite period. Section 489-F, P.P.C. was originally inserted in Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 by Ordinance LXXII of 1995, providing conviction for counterfeiting or using documents resembling National Prize Bonds or unauthorized sale thereof and while the same was part of the statute, again under Ordinance LXXXV of 2002, another Section under the same number viz. 489-F of P.P.C. was inserted on 25.10.2002 providing conviction and sentence for the persons guilty of dishonestly issuing a cheque towards repayment of loan or fulfillment of an obligation, which is dishonored on its presentation. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5724 Const. P. 814/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5725 Criminal Miscelleneous 473/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Abdul Shakoor (Applicant) VS The state (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-AUG-24 No suffice it to say that the offenses under the Sindh Child Marriages Restrained Act, 2014 and the Rules 2016 framed thereunder explicitly provide that cognizance of offenses under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act 2014 can be taken by the Judicial Magistrate of the first class and the police has not been set free to take cognizance of the offenses and lodge First Information Report without permission of the Magistrate as the complaint is to be made before the Magistrate under Section 5 of the Sindh Child Marriages Restraint Rules, 2016. 7. Besides, the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939 recognizes such age as sixteen years (which earlier was 15 years but was substituted as sixteen years by the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (VIII of 1961), which finds a place as Section 13 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961 and reads as under:- (13. Amendment of the dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939).In the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (VIII of 1939) in section 2:- 1. After clause (ii) the following new clause (ii-a) shall be inserted, namely:- ???(ii-a) that the husband has taken any additional wife??? (b) In clause (vii), for the word ???fifteen??? the word ???sixteen??? shall be substituted) 8. Further, per Section 271 and 272 of Mulla???s Principles of Muhammadan Law a marriage of a minor (who has not attained puberty) is not invalid for the simple reason that it was brought about by the father or grand-father and continues to be valid unless same is repudiated by that girl before attaining the age of 18 years. Therefore, such act of the father and grandfather is protected by Muslim Laws unless the same is established or proved to be in manifest disadvantage of the minor. Besides, Section 273 of the Mulla???s Principles of Muhammadan Law, provides that the marriage brought about by other guardians is also not invalid unless she, resorted to her operation to repudiate the marriage on attaining puberty. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5726 Const. P. 494/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Riaz Hussain Buriro & others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5727 Const. P. 576/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Mohammad Liaqat Ali Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5728 Const. P. 803/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Uzair & Others (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5729 Const. P. 628/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 08-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5730 Const. P. 733/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Amanullah & other (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5731 Const. P. 879/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Hafiza Imrana Maqsood (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 26-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5732 Const. P. 660/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Khuda Bux & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5733 Const. P. 70/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Kishwar Kumar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5734 Const. P. 433/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Hassan Mahar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5735 Const. P. 901/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Ali Khan & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 21-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5736 Const. P. 621/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ahmed Bux Mangrio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5737 Const. P. 632/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Alam Khan & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5738 Cr.Acq.A. 66/2021 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Shakeel Ahmed Lodhi (Appellant) VS Khursheed Soomro & Ors (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5739 Const. P. 1608/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Zeeshan Raza Mangi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5740 Const. P. 867/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Imdad Ali Lakho (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5741 Const. P. 1569/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Syed Muhammad Muneer Shah & another (Petitioner) VS M/S Shah Abdul latif University & Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 02-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5742 Const. P. 553/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Ghafoor & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5743 Const. P. 823/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Muhammad Jamshed (Petitioner) VS Umair Ali (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 No On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal in rent matters rather this jurisdiction is limited to disturb those findings which, prima facie, appear to have resulted in some glaring illegalities resulting into miscarriage of justice. The finality in the rent hierarchy is attached to the appellate Court and when there are concurrent findings of both the Courts below, the scope becomes rather tightened. It is pertinent to mention here that captioned petitions fall within the writ of certiorari against the judgments passed by both Courts below in rent jurisdiction and it is a settled principle of law that same cannot be disturbed until and unless it is proved that same is the result of misreading or non-reading of evidence. The instant petitions are against concurrent findings recorded by both the Courts below. Thus, for the foregoing reasons, the findings recorded by the learned Rent Controller as well as the Appellate Court are cogent and well-reasoned and thus do not call for any interference by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5744 Criminal Miscelleneous 734/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2022 MUHAMMAD ANWAR S/O MURTAZA (Applicant) VS THE STATE & ANOTHER (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-NOV-24 Yes Primarily, seized vehicles can generally be released during criminal trials. However, under the CNSA, vehicle release during drug offense trials is restricted. Only the lawful owner, who was/is unaware of the intended crime and has no connection to the accused, can seek release on Superdari. The prosecution must prove the owner's knowledge during the trial. The court can grant interim release if satisfied with the owner's claim and lack of association with the crime. To prevent the registration of crime-involved vehicles, the Supreme Court in the case of Amjad Ali Khan Vs the State vide order dated 13.03.2020, considered amending the Motor Vehicle Ordinance (MVO) and its rules. Additionally, develop an online verification system for vehicle crime history, require a No Objection Certificate from the police or an affidavit from the transferor/transferee at the time of registration. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5745 Const. P. 387/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Hakim Ali Jatoi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 24-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5746 Const. P. 512/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Zahid Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5747 Const. P. 2142/2018 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2018 Gulsher s/o Allah Rakhio Kharos (Petitioner) VS The State & an Other (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5748 Const. P. 603/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Raza Shaikh (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5749 Const. P. 510/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Asghar Ali (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5750 Criminal Miscelleneous 38/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Hina Siraj Manoo W/o Siraj Sadiq Manoo (Applicant) VS The State & another (Respondent) S.B. Order 03-JUL-24 Yes In the instant case when the proceedings against the accused were stopped by the consent of the parties, they were on bail. It is well settled that release/discharge in such a case can only be construed to mean release from the liability for attending the Court, consequent upon the stoppage of the proceedings, the case comes to an end for an indefinite period. Prima facie, the accused are, therefore, no longer required to attend the Court proceedings due to stoppage of the proceeding sine a die till disposal of Civil Suit No. 945 of 2015. In such a scenario I have come across section 249, Cr. P.C., which is like section 253 Cr. P.C., which was deleted in the wake of law reforms. The defunct section empowered the Court to "discharge" the accused at any stage of the case before framing of charge against him/her. However, the accused's discharge under the said section did not operate as a permanent closure of the case against him/her. After his discharge, if sufficient evidence became available, the case could be revived against him/her. Similarly the stoppage of the proceedings under section 249, Cr.P.C. has the effect of discharging the accused until such time when on availability of the requisite evidence the case could be revived against him/her. However, in the present case, the proceedings have been adjourned sine a die till disposal of the civil proceedings and the prosecution was set at liberty to file an application for bringing the case on file before the Court after disposal of the aforesaid civil proceedings. In the meanwhile the bail bonds and sureties of the accused were ordered to remain intact till further orders, which triggered the cause the surety/applicant to apply for discharging the surety with substitution of P.R bond in the like amount as ordered by the competent Court of law, when the bail of the accused was granted. It is admitted position that the Civil Suit between the parties is pending adjudication before this Court and the fate of that suit is yet to be decided, in the meanwhile keeping in view the legal position of the case that normally criminal proceedings should not be postponed pending the disposal of the civil litigation connected with the same subject matter, but where it is clear that criminal liability is dependent upon the result of the civil litigation or is so intimately concern with it that there is a danger of grave injustice being done in the case, if there be a conflict of decision between the civil Court and the criminal Court then in such event it was/is equally clear that that criminal Court has not only the right to proceed but should also stay its hand until the civil litigation is disposed of. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5751 Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2019 Saif Shujaat and Ors (Petitioner) VS Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 17-DEC-24 Yes Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case of the petitioners for promotion may be considered, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of the competent authority. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5752 Const. P. 615/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Imtiaz Ali mahesar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 07-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5753 Const. P. 1530/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst Salma Naz (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-MAY-24 No Whether a lady who is divorced will be treated as unmarried for the purpose of Rule 4.10.2. (A) of the West Pakistan Civil Servants Pensions Rules, 1963 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
5754 Const. P. 598/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Abdul Qadir Chandio (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 14-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5755 Criminal Miscelleneous 652/2023 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Mst. Fariha Ahmaree (Appellant) VS SHO PS A Section Sukkur & Others (Opponent) S.B. Order 10-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5756 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. 23/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 AMEERULLAH S/O MASTA JAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 20-NOV-24 Yes It was incumbent upon the police to associate some independent/private persons; and just saying that no one was available at the spot is not sufficient thus testimony of police officials in this regard in given circumstances, cannot be safely relied upon to maintain conviction against the appellant. For extending the benefit of the doubt to an accused, there do not need to be multiple circumstances creating doubt, if there is a single circumstance which creates reasonable doubt in a prudent mind about the guilt of accused, he will be entitled to such benefit. Once it was established on record that the Appellant did not commit an offense punishable under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, the provisions pertaining to the exclusion of Section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), as referenced above, become inapplicable to the present case, where no conviction has been rendered under the ATA, 1997. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5757 Const. P. 885/2022 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2022 Shakeel Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 16-MAY-24 Yes In view of the foregoing, this Court cannot give sanctity to the documents produced by them and leave it for the Competent Authority of the respondents to determine the genuineness or otherwise of the documents, claims, and counter-claims, the issue of salary and arrears if any be determined by their respective heads of the departments, therefore, on the aforesaid plea the Constitutional Petitions filed by the petitioners cannot be maintained. On the subject issue, this Court seeks guidance from the pronouncement of the Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of the Government of Punjab through Chief Secretary and others vs. Aamir Junaid and others [2015 SCMR 74], Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5758 Cr.Bail 1259/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 Kamran @ Wago S/o Fareed Gul (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent) S.B. Order 15-JUL-24 Yes The offense under section 353, P.P.C. is bailable and punishable for 2 years or a fine. As far as section 324 PPC is concerned, in an attempt to murder case falling within the ambit of section 324, P.P.C., the nature of the act done, the intention of the offender and the circumstances leading to the occurrence are the essential ingredients, which need to be probed into determine the guilt or otherwise of an accused as the police officials have not sustained any injury on their body. As such the subject offenses do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 (1) Cr.P.C. However to ascertain the offense for an attempt to murder the police officials, and bullet injuries sustained by the accused on the lower part of his leg requires serious consideration and further probe as none of the police personnel sustained any injury, and it is for the learned trial Court to thresh out the truth after recording the evidence being adduced by the prosecution and defense during trial. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5759 Cr.Bail 1511/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2024 MUHAMMAD MINHAJ QAZI S/O MUHAMMAD MAMNOON (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent) D.B. Order 29-OCT-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
5760 Const. P. 886/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi 2023 Khair Nawaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) D.B. Judgement 18-DEC-24 Yes Regularization of contractual employees requires a clear legal basis, a well-defined policy, and a fair assessment of the employee's performance and qualifications. Without these, employees cannot claim regularization of service. Reference in this regard may be made to the cases of Vice Chancellor Agriculture University, Peshawar v Muhammad Shafiq 2024 SCMR 527, Federation of Pakistan through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Islamabad and another v. Fazal-e-Subhan and others (PLD 2024 SC 515); Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Secretary Forest, Peshawar and others v. Sher Aman and others (2022 SCMR 406); and Messrs. State Oil Company Limited v. Bakht Siddique and others (2018 SCMR 1181). Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5761 Const. P. 800/2021 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2021 Talib Hussain Sahito (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5762 Const. P. 743/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Shazia & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 23-MAY-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5763 Const. P. 273/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Naveed Ali Siyal (Petitioner) VS Government of sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 02-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman(Author)
5764 Const. P. 630/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Ghulam Akbar Narejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 09-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5765 Const. P. 443/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Muhammad Saleem & Others (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 25-APR-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5766 Const. P. 1325/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Firdos Khanam (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 30-APR-24 No We have noted that the subject petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and not on merits and in the intervening period Supreme Court has taken cognizance and remanded the matter to the department. In such circumstances, in our view, it will be just and proper to remand the case to the respondent department with the direction to re-examine/reconsider the case of the petitioners/affected persons and to decide their matter in terms of the ratio of the Judgment dated 03.08.2023 passed by Supreme Court of Pakistan in Civil Petitions Nos.903, 904, 905, 906, 907 of 2023 for the reason that the Supreme Court has decided the point of law in the above proceedings which not only covers the case of some of the petitioners and affected persons who have not taken any legal proceedings as such benefit should be given to them; in such a case, the dictates of justice and rule of good governance demand that the benefit of the above judgment be extended to effect civil servants/petitioners, who may not be parties to the above litigation instead of compelling them to approach the Supreme Court or any other legal forum. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5767 Const. P. 134/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Mst Zakia Chachar (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 22-MAY-24 Yes Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5768 Const. P. 820/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2024 Abdul Razzaque Ghanghro (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 Yes Without prejudice the rights of the petitioners to receive bardana under the wheat procurement policy 2023-24 vide notification No. SO(W)-7(31)/2023-2024, it is for the respondent-Department to look into the entitlement of the petitioners, if any, which is subject to the availability of the bardana at their wheat procurement centers. If the respondent-Department is no longer in a position to distribute the bardana to the growers / khatedars, then the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail their remedy in accordance with law. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5769 Const. P. 1291/2013 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2013 Hafeezullah (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Ors (Respondent) D.B. Order 01-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
5770 Const. P. 518/2023 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur 2023 Safiullah Abbasi (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) D.B. Order 31-JUL-24 Yes We are cognizant of the fact that public employment is a source of livelihood; therefore, no citizen shall be discriminated against in the said matter on the grounds as provided under Article 27 of the Constitution. The government is bound to make certain quotas in appointments or posts in favor of any less privileged class of citizen which in the opinion of the government is not adequately represented in the services under the state. That???s why Rule 11-A of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, and Transfer) Rules, 1974 as amended up-to-date is introduced to cater to that situation to accommodate the aforesaid categories of civil servants. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5771 Criminal Miscelleneous 101/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Mst. Nazeeran (Applicant) VS SSP Complaint Cell MPK & others (Respondent) S.B. Order 06-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
5772 Criminal Miscelleneous 458/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas 2024 Raheel Ali (Applicant) VS DIG Mirpurkhas and others (Respondent) S.B. Order 13-AUG-24 No Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)