1) 375/2023 H.C.A Zahidullah Khan (Appellant) V/S Pakistan Defence Officers Housing Authority & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:

"Inordinate delay; judgment set aside on the sole ground of inordinate delay."
Read more
Matter:AGAINST ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
Order Date: 16-OCT-24

2) 422/2019 Cr.Appeal GHULAM MUSTAFA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24

3) 422/2019 Criminal Appeal GHULAM MUSTAFA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24

4) 421/2019 Cr.Appeal GHULAM MUSTAFA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24

5) 421/2019 Criminal Appeal GHULAM MUSTAFA (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24

6) 68/2022 Cr.J.A Farooque (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
Order Date: 11-OCT-24

7) 427/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Muhammad Umar Kunbhar (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:

This Court vide order dated 28-09-2024 disposed of the instant application with a direction to DIG Mirpurkhas to conduct the inquiry to ascertain the factual position of the case by hearing the parties; however, no compliance report was submitted and again another order dated 02-10-2024 was passed with direction to DIGP Mirpurkhas to submit a compliance report. Today, DIGP Mirpurkhas has submitted a compliance report. At this stage, both the parties agreed to the disposal of the contempt application in the term that SHO shall take a personal bond from the private respondents in the sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (PKR. one million) from each respondent to the effect that no harassment shall be caused to the applicant. If they fail to furnish the bond for the aforesaid purpose, DIGP shall take immediate action in terms of paragraph 05 of the compliance report. 3. This contempt/listed application is disposed of in the above terms.
Read more
Matter:AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 09-OCT-24

8) 1835/2024 Cr.Bail ZEESHAN A@ SALMAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST
Advocates:Tahir ur Rehman(ADVO-6031-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 08-OCT-24

9) 525/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Hassan Sultan Thr Attorney Ghulam Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Chairman Union Council Cantonment Board & Another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:FAMILY MATTER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24

10) 1297/2024 Cr.Bail GHULAM UMAR S/O AZIZULLAH GOPANG & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Advocates:Muhammad Altaf(ADVO-12600-SBC-KHI),Shah Muhammad Zaman(ADVO-14965-SBC-MLR),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24

11) 1503/2024 Cr.Bail SYED SAQIB ALI & ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Advocates:Haji Muhammad Suleman(ADVO-18493-SBC-KHE),Shabana(ADVO-6326-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24

12) 1809/2024 Cr.Bail HASSAN ALAM S/O NOOR LAM & ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Advocates:Muhammad Umar(ADVO-23239-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24

13) 1826/2024 Cr.Bail PUNHOON S/O ALI MUHAMMAD GABOL & 05 ORS (Applicant) V/S THE STASTE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Advocates:Abdul Qadir(ADVO-20685-SBC-KHS),Jamshad Ahmed Abbasi(ADVO-15974-SBC-KHS),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 07-OCT-24

14) 164/2024 Cr.Bail Zeeshan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:

The law on bail is now well settled. In cases where the offense falls outside the non-prohibitory clause of section 497(1) of Cr.P.C., bail is to be granted as a matter of course, and rejection of the same is an exception. Where, however, an offense falls within the prohibitory clause, bail can only be granted if the court concludes that there is no reasonable ground for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offense or where an accused makes out a case of further inquiry into the guilt of the accused or in case the accused is under the age of 16 years or is sick or infirm.
Read more
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-24

15) 899/2020 Const. P. M/s PSO (Petitioner) V/S The Pakistan C.A.A and Others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi

Tag Line:

A Division Bench Judgment involving another Service Station, even if it involves one of the members of the Bench hearing the Petition, is not binding when the Petitions filed by the other Service Stations are entirely on different facts and laws. Petitions disposed of to be decided by the proper forum elected by parties with status quo in place subject to further orders of the competent court.
Read more
Matter:PROPERTY MATTER
Advocates:Asim Iqbal(ADVO-4488-SBC-KHI),Amna Warsi(ADVO-22352-PBC-LHR),Khurram Rashid(ADVO-9224-SBC-KHI),Farman Ullah(ADVO-11315-SBC-KHI)
Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-24

16) 218/2024 Const. P. Mashooque Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:

The controversy as raised by the parties about the custody of the minor needs to be looked into by the learned Guardian and Wards Court concerned, if approached and the decision thereof shall be made within a reasonable time, keeping in view the welfare of the minor strictly under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, I am fortified by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases of Humayun Hassan v. Arslan Humayun and another, PLD 2013 SC 557 and Mst. Qurat-ul-Ain Vs. Station House Officer, Police Station Saddar Jalalpur Jattan, District Gujrat (2024 SCMR 484).
Read more
Matter:DETENTION
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 04-OCT-24

17) 1298/2024 Const. P. Jan Muhamad (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad
Matter:NATURE OF CASE NOT ENTERED
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Bohio
Order Date: 03-OCT-24

18) 1469/2024 Cr.Bail Muhammad Asif S/o Zahoor Ahmed (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST
Advocates:Karam Chand Kingrani(ADVO-2680-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-24

19) 1565/2024 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD SOHAIL S/O SAID ALI KHAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST
Advocates:Qadir Hussain(ADVO-6245-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-24

20) 1592/2024 Cr.Bail GUL NAWAB S/O NAIR JAN (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL AFTER ARREST
Advocates:Muhammad Saleem(ADVO-19641-SBC-KHS),Spl. Prosecutor Sindh (ANF)(SpPANF),Zain Ul Abdin(ADVO-18223-SBC-KHE),Irfan Ahmed(ADVO-14967-SBC-MLR)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-24

21) 1860/2024 Cr.Bail MST. SHAHINA W/O MUHAMMAD TAHIR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Advocates:Muhammad Naseeruddin(ADVO-12059-SBC-KHE),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-24

22) 512/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Muhammad Khan & others (Applicant) V/S SSP Tharparkar @ Mithi & others (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:

Criminal Miscellaneous Application under section 561-A Cr.P.C assailing order dated 30-08-2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II/ Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, Tharparkar @ Mithi, in Criminal Miscellaneous application No.493/2024, whereby application under section 22-A & B Cr.P.C filed by the respondent No.3 was allowed with direction to the S.H.O concerned to record statement of the respondent/complainant and same be incorporated in 154 Cr.P.C book, if it constitutes a cognizable offence. 2. Learned counsel submits that F.I.R No.28/2024 under sections 393, 506(2), 504, 114, 34 P.P.C has already been registered at PS Kaloi District Tharparkar on 31-08-2024 against the applicants; therefore, the purpose of filing this Crl. Misc. Application has become infructuous. However, he insists that he will pursue his remedy as per law. 3. In view of above interim order passed by this court vide order dated 04-09-2024 is hereby re-called and this Crl. Miscellaneous Application is disposed of as FIR No. 28/2024 of PS Kaloi District Tharparkar has already been registered.
Read more
Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 03-OCT-24

23) 1424/2024 Cr.Bail QADEER HUSSAIN SHAH S/O MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SHAH (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Karachi
Matter:BAIL BEFORE ARREST/PRE ARREST BAIL
Advocates:Naeem Iqbal(ADVO-11353-SBC-KHI),Prosecutor General Sindh(PGS)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-24

24) 58/2024 Criminal Miscelleneous Nadeem Jat (Applicant) V/S Manager HBL Chandi Chock (Respondent)
Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas

Tag Line:

It appears from the cross examination of complainant that he had made certain admissions, like he admitted that he did not produce the ownership documents of alleged plot. He also admitted that the respondent was/is his real brother and civil proceedings is pending on subject issue. He admitted that there was mobile tower installed on the disputed land and such agreement was executed between the company and the respondent. The witness of the complainant admitted that there was/is civil dispute between the parties over the plot. Such admissions on the part of complainant and his witnesses leads to believe that there were strained relations between two real brothers and registration of subject case appears to be result of such dispute. The complainant has also admitted that place of incident is located in populated area, but none from the locality came forward to corroborate the version of complainant. The complainant also admitted that previously, the respondent had lodged ???NC??? against him and such fact could not be overlooked. The Medicolegal Officer Doctor Kanwar Lal admitted in the deposition that there was/is correction in the OPD slip. He admitted that there was/is no injury upon the body and head of the complainant. He admitted that there is possibility that the present injured might have received injury by falling on tile or marble. He also admitted that on the same day, injured Jhaman appeared with the police letter.
Read more
Matter:AGAINST THE ORDER
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
Order Date: 02-OCT-24